DOCSLIB.ORG

Commission on the National Guard and Reserves 2521 S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Commission on the National Guard and Reserves 2521 S COMMISSION ON THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES 2521 S. CLARK STREET, SUITE 650 ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202 ARNOLD L. PUNARO The Honorable Carl Levin The Honorable John McCain CHAIRMAN Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee on Armed Services on Armed Services WILLIAM L. BALL, III United States Senate United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Washington, DC 20510 LES BROWNLEE RHETT B. DAwsON The Honorable Ike Skelton The Honorable Duncan Hunter Chairman, Committee Ranking Member, Committee LARRY K. ECKLES on Armed Services on Armed Services United States House of United States House of PATRICIA L. LEWIS Representatives Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Washington, DC 20515 DAN MCKINNON WADE ROWLEY January 31, 2008 JAMES E. SHERRARD III Dear Chairmen and Ranking Members: DONALD L. STOCKTON The Commission on the National Guard and Reserves is pleased to submit to E. GORDON STUMP you its final report as required by Public Law 108-375, the Ronald Reagan National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by J. STANTON THOMpsON Public Law 109-163). As you know, Congress chartered this Commission to assess the reserve component of the U.S. military and to recommend changes to ensure that the National Guard and other reserve components are organized, trained, equipped, compensated, and supported to best meet the needs of U.S. national security. The Commission’s first interim report, containing initial findings and the description of a strategic plan to complete our work, was delivered on June 5, 2006. The second interim report, delivered on March 1, 2007, was required by Public Law 109-364, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, enacted on October 17, 2006. That second report examined 17 proposals contained in the National Defense Enhancement and National Guard Empowerment Act, and included 23 Commission recommendations covering the broad spectrum of issues raised by the legislation. The Commission applauds Congress’s timely and decisive action in imple- menting a number of these important provisions in the 2008 National Defense Authorization Act. In carefully considering the Commission’s recom- mendations, Congress has changed in a fundamental way the Department of Defense’s role for the homeland, and taken significant steps to make the nation safer from man-made and natural disasters. Secretary of Defense Gates PHONE 703.699.2800 FAX 703.699.2846 EMAIL [email protected] ESTABLISHED PURSUANT TO THE RONALD W. REAGAN NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005, PUB. L. NO. 108-375,118 STAT 1880 (2004) also has taken timely and decisive action to implement those recommendations not requiring legisla- tion, and has advocated before Congress for those requiring legislation. The final report of the Commission was informed by 17 days of public hearings involving 115 witnesses; 52 Commission meetings; more than 850 interviews; numerous site visits, forums, and panel discussions; and the detailed analysis of thousands of documents supplied at the Commission’s request by the military services, government agencies, experts, and other stakeholders. It contains six major conclusions and 95 recommendations, supported by 163 findings. In conducting its work, the Commission has gathered information, analyzed evidence, identified significant problems facing the reserve components, and sought to offer the best possible recom- mendations to solve the problems identified. The problems we identify in this report are systemic, have evolved over many years, and are not the product of any one official or administration. Many of the Commission’s recommendations to solve those problems can be implemented immediately; however, a number of them may take years to implement effectively. Their full implementation will require additional work by Congress and the executive branch. At the core of these changes is the explicit recognition of the evolution of the reserve components from a purely strategic force, with lengthy mobilization times designed to meet Cold War threats from large nation-states, to an operational force. This operational reserve must be readily available for emergencies at home and abroad, and more fully integrated with the active component. Simul- taneously, this force must retain required strategic elements and capabilities. The Commission concludes that there is no reasonable alternative to the nation’s continued increased reliance on reserve components as part of its operational force for missions at home and abroad. However, the Commission also concludes that this change from their Cold War posture necessitates fundamental reforms to reserve components’ homeland roles and missions, personnel management systems, equipping and training policies, policies affecting families and employers, and the orga- nizations and structures used to manage the reserves. These reforms are essential to ensure that this operational reserve is feasible in the short term while sustainable over the long term. In fact, the future of the all-volunteer force depends for its success on policymakers’ undertaking needed reforms to ensure that the reserve components are ready, capable, and available for both operational and strategic purposes. In reviewing the past several decades of intense use of the reserve components, most notably as an integral part of operations in Iraq, Afghanistan, and the homeland, the Commission has found indisputable and overwhelming evidence of the need for policymakers and the military to break with outdated policies and processes and implement fundamental, thorough reforms in these areas. The members of this Commission share this view unanimously. We note that these recommenda- tions will require the nation to reorder the priorities of the Department of Defense, thereby neces- sitating a major restructuring of laws and DOD’s budget. There are some costs associated with these recommendations, but the problems are serious, the need to address them is urgent, and the benefits of the reforms we identify more than exceed the expense of implementing them. These issues are extremely complex, and people of good character and conscience will disagree with some of the solutions we propose. That is to be expected. No significant reforms have been undertaken in the laws affecting the reserve components for more than half a century. The last major Defense reform effort—the Goldwater-Nichols Department of Defense Reorganization Act of 1986—made fundamental adjustments to the roles of the Secretary of Defense, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and combatant commanders but did not affect the structures or policies of the reserve components. We hope and anticipate that this report will generate lively debate among the institutions and key policymakers responsible for protecting U.S. national security. With the submission of this our last report, the Commission turns our findings, conclusions, and recommendations over to the legislative and executive branches, where we feel confident they will be carefully considered, improved upon, and implemented. We believe that this action will have the same profound and positive effects as did the Goldwater-Nichols legislation. The Commission wants to express our continuing deep appreciation for the significant support and cooperation from the Congress and the Department of Defense as well as the sustained, superb work of the Commission’s staff. The Commission also wishes to recognize the public service of Senator John Warner, as he concludes a long and distinguished career that has set the standard for statesmanship and bipartisan advocacy of a strong national defense. We close by thanking all military members in our nation’s active and reserve forces. Our nation is indebted to them for their service and the sacrifices that they, their families, and their employers have made—and will continue to make—on behalf of the United States of America. Sincerely, cc: The Honorable Robert Gates, Secretary, Department of Defense COMMISSION ON THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES 2521 S. CLARK STREET, SUITE 650 ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202 ARNOLD L. PUNARO The Honorable Robert Gates CHAIRMAN Secretary, Department of Defense 1000 Defense Pentagon, Room 3E880 WILLIAM L. BALL, III Washington, DC 20301 LES BROWNLEE January 31, 2008 RHETT B. DAwsON LARRY K. ECKLES Dear Secretary Gates: PATRICIA L. LEWIS The Commission on the National Guard and Reserves is pleased to submit to you its final report as required by Public Law 108-375, the Ronald Reagan DAN MCKINNON National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2005 (as amended by Public Law 109-163). As you know, Congress chartered this Commission WADE ROWLEY to assess the reserve component of the U.S. military and to recommend JAMES E. SHERRARD III changes to ensure that the National Guard and other reserve components are organized, trained, equipped, compensated, and supported to best meet DONALD L. STOCKTON the needs of U.S. national security. The Commission’s first interim report, containing initial findings and E. GORDON STUMP the description of a strategic plan to complete our work, was delivered on June 5, 2006. The second interim report, delivered on March 1, 2007, J. STANTON THOMpsON was required by Public Law 109-364, the John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, enacted on October 17, 2006. That second report examined 17 proposals contained in the National Defense Enhancement and National Guard Empowerment Act, and included 23 Commission recommendations covering the broad
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The People's Liberation Army
    January 5, 2021 China Primer: The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Overview sovereignty) as the “operational target” of military The two-million-strong People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is preparations since 1993. China’s defense planners anticipate the military arm of the People’s Republic of China’s that a military confrontation over Taiwan could involve (PRC’s) ruling Communist Party. The Trump “powerful enemy interference,” an apparent reference to the Administration identified strategic competition with China United States. China also has sought military capabilities to and Russia as “the primary concern in U.S. national dominate its maritime periphery and to support foreign security” in 2018 and U.S. defense officials have since said policy and economic initiatives globally. that China is the U.S. Department of Defense’s (DOD’s) top priority. According to a 2020 DOD report, the PLA has PLA Modernization and Key Capabilities “already achieved parity with—or even exceeded—the Since 1978, China has engaged in a sustained and broad United States” in several areas in which it has focused its effort to transform the PLA from an infantry-heavy, low- military modernization efforts and is strengthening its technology, ground forces-centric force into a leaner, more ability to “counter an intervention by an adversary in the networked, high-technology force with an emphasis on joint Indo-Pacific region and project power globally.” See also operations and power projection. In 2015 and 2016, Xi IF11712 on U.S.-China Military-to-Military Relations. publicly launched the most ambitious reform and reorganization of the PLA since the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Lbe Anng Guard Belongs
    lbe Anng Guard belongs. be gou b to those l\lho prepare for it. tare ot the tu arc clong in the Guard. A Message from Mai. Gen. Joel B. Paris,lll My Fell ow Guardsmen: Our Nation's need for o strong National Guard and Reserves brings on o need for new and better equipment for our units. Recently the Georgia Army Guard's inventory has expanded to include the new "Gamma Go at'~ on all-terrain vehicle. The Georgia Air Guard also has received the first three of its 18 F-100D Supersabre fighter aircraft. Although not in current production, the tact ical fighter is new to the Georgia Guard ond is still o highly effective aircraft. New equipment is arriving to replace that which is out-dated and worn out. These new vehicles, aircraft, and weapons will enable us to increase our efficiency in performing our expanding role in defending the United States. When you are talking to prospective recruits, or ;ust discussing the Guard with your friends, don't forget to mention the great responsibility placed on us by the Defense Department. We in the Guard accept this challenge and ore proud to have this vital role in the defense of our country. 151ST AVIATION BATTALION IN FUND RAISING ROLE-- The men of Winder's 151st Aviation Battalion have been busy this spring participating in s everal fund raising activities. (Left) Sp6 Larry Wilburn helps out with the Easter Seals drive in Ap ril. (Right) Capt. James R. Howard, Hq Company commander, pre­ s~nts a check in May to Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Us National Guard and Public Order Management June 2020
    THE US NATIONAL GUARD AND PUBLIC ORDER MANAGEMENT JUNE 2020 I. OVERVIEW1 activation is not the purpose or purview of this brief. Regardless of the mission, any deployment In the past two weeks, governors in as many as of the National Guard in support of domestic law 23 US states and Washington, DC have mobilized enforcement raises critical issues for consideration state National Guard units to support local law by State and National Guard leadership. enforcement in the response to protests against racism and police brutality.2 These units have National Guard personnel deployed to provide been involved in at least one lethal use of force direct or indirect support to law enforcement incident: according to state officials, a Kentucky during protests could become involved in National Guard member was responsible for the situations involving the use of force or physical fatal shooting of David McAtee during protests confrontations with protestors. Guard members in Louisville, Kentucky on June 1. Other Guard may also be placed in circumstances in which members as well as the Louisville Metro Police they witness or become complicit in misconduct were also involved in the incident. by local police units. In the last week, CIVIC staff contacted a number of National Guard units and As a matter of principle, Center for Civilians found that very few have provided clear or explicit in Conflict (CIVIC) generallywarns against the directions for Guard members to deal with these deployment of military or military-like units to situations, or guidance to the public on how best to manage public order, including protests and report any concerns they may have with National curfews, given the risk of escalation of violence Guard personnel.
    [Show full text]
  • Russell to Retire Army CSM Recalls Time As Senior Soldier
    Contents Vol. 1, No. 7 Georgia DoD videos for download 3 A ‘Peachtree’ in Afghanistan: 2009 road race honors fallen warriors 4 The Georgia State employees earn service award 7 Guardsman Intel unit trains hard, displays ‘can do attitude’ 8 Send comments, Immersion in Taiwan 9 suggestions, articles, photos or other Guard History 10 contributions to: Georgia engineers in Guyana for humanitarian operation 11 [email protected] Chavers, Johnson laid to rest honored for service, sacrifice 13 The Georgia Guardsman is Not Just another AT for JTF 781 14 published monthly under the provisions of AR 360-81 and Legislator visits Air Guard 17 AF 6-1 by the Georgia Depart- ment of Defense Public Affairs Wood turns over 110th CCSB to Goss 18 Office. The views and opin- ions expressed in the Georgia Guardsman are not necessarily those of the Departments of the Army and Air Force or the Adjutant General of Georgia. The Georgia Guardsman is dis- tributed free to members of the Georgia Army and Air National Guard, State Defense Force and other interested persons at their request. Updated news and infor- mation on the Georgia DoD can be viewed at www.gadod.net Want to submit a story for your unit? All submissions for the Georgia Guardsman can be sent to Amanda Kenny at [email protected]. Please submit your stories in a Word document. All photos should be in a JPEG format and NOT embedded in the document. Georgia Guardsman : 2 : No. 7 3 Georgia DoD videos for download To see videos, click on the name of the story.
    [Show full text]
  • Answer: Maoism Is a Form of Communism Developed by Mao Tse Tung
    Ques 1: What is Maoism? Answer: Maoism is a form of communism developed by Mao Tse Tung. It is a doctrine to capture State power through a combination of armed insurgency, mass mobilization and strategic alliances. The Maoists also use propaganda and disinformation against State institutions as other components of their insurgency doctrine. Mao called this process, the ‘Protracted Peoples War’, where the emphasis is on ‘military line’ to capture power. Ques 2: What is the central theme of Maoist ideology? Answer: The central theme of Maoist ideology is the use of violence and armed insurrection as a means to capture State power. ‘Bearing of arms is non-negotiable’ as per the Maoist insurgency doctrine. The maoist ideology glorifies violence and the ‘Peoples Liberation Guerrilla Army’ (PLGA) cadres are trained specifically in the worst forms of violence to evoke terror among the population under their domination. However, they also use the subterfuge of mobilizing people over issues of purported inadequacies of the existing system, so that they can be indoctrinated to take recourse to violence as the only means of redressal. Ques 3: Who are the Indian Maoists? Answer: The largest and the most violent Maoist formation in India is the Communist Party of India (Maoist). The CPI (Maoist) is an amalgamation of many splinter groups, which culminated in the merger of two largest Maoist groups in 2004; the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist), People War and the Maoist Communist Centre of India. The CPI (Maoist) and all its front organizations formations have been included in the list of banned terrorist organizations under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate (Legislative Day of Wednesday, February 28, 1996)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 104 CONGRESS, SECOND SESSION Vol. 142 WASHINGTON, THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 29, 1996 No. 26 Senate (Legislative day of Wednesday, February 28, 1996) The Senate met at 11 a.m., on the ex- Senator MURKOWSKI for 15 minutes, able to get this opportunity to go piration of the recess, and was called to Senator DORGAN for 20 minutes; fol- where they can get the help they order by the President pro tempore lowing morning business today at 12 need—perhaps after the regular school [Mr. THURMOND]. noon, the Senate will begin 30 minutes hours. Why would we want to lock chil- of debate on the motion to invoke clo- dren in the District of Columbia into PRAYER ture on the D.C. appropriations con- schools that are totally inadequate, The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John ference report. but their parents are not allowed to or Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: At 12:30, the Senate will begin a 15- cannot afford to move them around Let us pray: minute rollcall vote on that motion to into other schools or into schools even Father, we are Your children and sis- invoke cloture on the conference re- in adjoining States? ters and brothers in Your family. port. It is also still hoped that during Today we renew our commitment to today’s session the Senate will be able It is a question of choice and oppor- live and work together here in the Sen- to complete action on legislation ex- tunity.
    [Show full text]
  • The China Coast Guard: Shifting from Civilian to Military Control in the Era
    FEATURE The China Coast Guard Shifting from Civilian to Military Control in the Era of Regional Uncertainty ULISES GRANADOS Abstract As part of the restructuring of state organizations announced in March 2018, it is known that the China Coast Guard (CCG), previously controlled by the State Oceanic Administration, is coming under the administration of the People’s Armed Police (PAP) from the Central Military Commission (CMC). As a para- digmatic shift from a joint civilian–military control (State Council–CMC) to a purely military one, the reorganization of the CCG, only five years from the latest reshuffling, seems to reveal an the party’s increasing control over the military as outlined in the September 2017 CCP Central Committee and also the intention by the Chinese central government to provide the CCG with more flexibility and authority to act decisively in disputed waters in the East and South China Seas if needed. This article inquiries into the causes, logic, and likely regional conse- quences of such a decision. Amid the upgrading of insular features in the Spratlys, the deployment of bombers in the Paracels, and overall modernization of China’s naval capabilities, the article also explores plausible developments in which the PAP- led CCG, irregular maritime militias, and People’s Liberation Army Navy forces might coordinate more effectively efforts to safeguard self-proclaimed rights in littoral and blue- water areas in dispute. Introduction During the last eight years, East China Sea (ECS) and South China Sea (SCS) waters have been the setting of increased Chinese civil and naval activity that have altered the balance of power among Northeast Asian and Southeast Asian states, trying to cope with a more robust projection of Chinese maritime power.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota National Guard
    MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD 2016 ANNUAL REPORT & 2017 OBJECTIVES MMXVI 2 | LETTER FROM THE ADJUTANT GENERAL 3 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD PRIORITIES 5 | DIVERSITY 6 | COMPETENT READY FORCE 7 | OPTIMAL FORCE STRUCTURE 8 | BEYOND THE YELLOW RIBBON 9 | SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTURE 10 | CYBER SECURITY & RESPONSE 11 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD | MAJOR COMMANDS 13 | MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD | AROUND THE WORLD 15 | JOINT FORCE HEADQUARTERS 16 | 34TH RED BULL INFANTRY DIVISION 17 | 2017 YEAR OF THE RED BULLS: 34TH INFANTRY DIVISION CENTENNIAL CONTENTS 19 | 34TH COMBAT AVIATION BRIGADE TO THE CITIZENS OF MINNESOTA 20 | 1 ST ARMORED BRIGADE COMBAT TEAM 21 | 347TH REGIONAL SUPPORT GROUP Minnesota’s steadfast commitment to advancing our National Guard priorities have yielded measurable results, and I know that our force is better manned, equipped and 22 | 84TH TROOP COMMAND trained to take on any challenge that the future may hold for our great team. As I begin my last full year as Minnesota’s Adjutant General, I swell with pride about the incredible results that Minnesota’s Soldiers and Airmen have accomplished on behalf of our state and nation during my seven-year term. 23 | 175TH REGIONAL TRAINING INSTITUTE 24 | CAMP RIPLEY TRAINING CENTER 2016 has indeed emphasized that our service members are committed to advancing the journey that began in 2010. By all measurements, we are more diverse and inclusive; not one, but two, female leaders were promoted to general officer in 2016. We are a more competent, ready force; Minnesota has established the standard by which reserve 25 | 133rd AIRLIFT WING force readiness is measured. We have moved the bar for optimal force structure; Minnesota continues to advance partnerships with major commands to ensure the correct 26 | 148TH FIGHTER WING equipment and people can assist our national and state security.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 3Rd 25Th ANNUAL RANGER HALL of FAME
    25th ANNUAL RANGER HALL OF FAME JUNE 28, 2017 FORT BENNING GEORGIA 2 3rd RANGER MEMORIAL Dedicated To All Rangers Past, Present, & Future Fort Benning, Georgia United States Army Ranger Hall of Fame 25th Annual Induction Ceremony June 28, 2017 NOMINATING COMMITTEE Airborne Rangers of the Korean War 75th Ranger Regiment Association Airborne and Ranger Training Brigade, The National Ranger Association 75th Ranger Regiment, The Ranger Regiment Association United States Army Ranger Association World Wide Army Ranger Association SELECTION COMMITTEE President - GEN (RET) William F. Kernan Commander, ARTB - COL Douglas G. Vincent Commander, 75th RGR RGT - COL Marcus S. Evans CSM, ARTB - CSM Victor A. Ballesteros CSM, 75th RGR RGT - CSM Craig A. Bishop Airborne Rangers of the Korean War Association 75th Ranger Regiment Association United States Army Ranger Association World Wide Army Ranger Association The members of the Ranger Hall of Fame Selection Board are proud to introduce the 2017 Ranger Hall of Fame inductees. The Ranger Hall of Fame began to honor and preserve the spirit and contributions of America’s most ex- traordinary Rangers in 1992. The members of the Ranger Hall of Fame Selection Board take meticulous care to ensure that only the most extraordinary Rangers earn induction, a difficult mission given the high caliber of all nom- inees. Their precepts are impartiality, fairness, and scrutiny. Select Ranger Units and associations representing each era of Ranger history impartially nominate induc- tees. The Selection Board scrutinizes each nominee to ensure only the most extraordinary contributions receive acknowledgement. Each Ranger association and U.S. Army MACOM may submit a maximum of 3 nominations per year.
    [Show full text]
  • National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008
    110TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 110–477 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 1585 DECEMBER 6, 2007.—Ordered to be printed VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:12 Dec 09, 2007 Jkt 038809 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6012 Sfmt 6012 E:\HR\OC\HR477.XXX HR477 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:12 Dec 09, 2007 Jkt 038809 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 E:\HR\OC\HR477.XXX HR477 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING with PROD1PC69 on bajohnson 1 110TH CONGRESS " ! REPORT 1st Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 110–477 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2008 CONFERENCE REPORT TO ACCOMPANY H.R. 1585 DECEMBER 6, 2007.—Ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 38–809 WASHINGTON : 2007 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:12 Dec 09, 2007 Jkt 038809 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\HR477.XXX HR477 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING E:\Seals\Congress.#13 VerDate Aug 31 2005 06:12 Dec 09, 2007 Jkt 038809 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5012 Sfmt 5012 E:\HR\OC\HR477.XXX HR477 bajohnson on PROD1PC69 with HEARING C O N T E N T S Page JOINT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT OF THE COMMITTEE OF CON- FERENCE ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening America's Defenses in the New Security Environment
    COMMISSION ON THE NATIONAL GUARD AND RESERVES 2521 S. CLARK STREET, SUITE 650 ARLINGTON, VIRGINIA 22202 ARNOLD L. PUNARO March 1, 2007 CHAIRMAN WILLIAM L. BALL, III Senator Carl Levin Chairman LES BROWNLEE Committee on Armed Services RHETT B. DAWSON United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 LARRY K. ECKLES Congressman Ike Skelton PATRICIA L. LEWIS Chairman DAN MCKINNON Committee on Armed Services United States House of Representatives WADE ROWLEY Washington, DC 20515 JAMES E. SHERRARD III Dear Chairman Levin and Chairman Skelton: DONALD L. STOCKTON E. GORDON STUMP As you know, the 13-member, independent Commission on the National Guard and Reserves was established by Congress in the Ronald Reagan J. STANTON THOMPSON National Defense Authorization Act of 2005. Congress chartered the Commission to assess the reserve component of the U.S. military and to recommend changes to ensure that the National Guard and other reserve components are organized, trained, equipped, compensated, and supported to best meet the needs of U.S. national security. The Commission’s final report must be submitted to Congress and the Secretary of Defense no later than January 31, 2008. The John Warner National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2007, enacted on October 17, 2006, instructed the Commission to examine 17 proposals aimed primarily at enhancing the status and institutional powers of the National Guard Bureau and its leadership, and improving the resources and capabilities of the National Guard, particularly in regard to homeland missions. Public Law 109-364 further required that the Commission report our findings and recommendations on these matters no later than March 1, 2007.
    [Show full text]