Cyclopia: the Face Predicts the Future
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Supratentorial Brain Malformations
Supratentorial Brain Malformations Edward Yang, MD PhD Department of Radiology Boston Children’s Hospital 1 May 2015/ SPR 2015 Disclosures: Consultant, Corticometrics LLC Objectives 1) Review major steps in the morphogenesis of the supratentorial brain. 2) Categorize patterns of malformation that result from failure in these steps. 3) Discuss particular imaging features that assist in recognition of these malformations. 4) Reference some of the genetic bases for these malformations to be discussed in greater detail later in the session. Overview I. Schematic overview of brain development II. Abnormalities of hemispheric cleavage III. Commissural (Callosal) abnormalities IV. Migrational abnormalities - Gray matter heterotopia - Pachygyria/Lissencephaly - Focal cortical dysplasia - Transpial migration - Polymicrogyria V. Global abnormalities in size (proliferation) VI. Fetal Life and Myelination Considerations I. Schematic Overview of Brain Development Embryology Top Mid-sagittal Top Mid-sagittal Closed Neural Tube (4 weeks) Corpus Callosum Callosum Formation Genu ! Splenium Cerebral Hemisphere (11-20 weeks) Hemispheric Cleavage (4-6 weeks) Neuronal Migration Ventricular/Subventricular Zones Ventricle ! Cortex (8-24 weeks) Neuronal Precursor Generation (Proliferation) (6-16 weeks) Embryology From ten Donkelaar Clinical Neuroembryology 2010 4mo 6mo 8mo term II. Abnormalities of Hemispheric Cleavage Holoprosencephaly (HPE) Top Mid-sagittal Imaging features: Incomplete hemispheric separation + 1)1) No septum pellucidum in any HPEs Closed Neural -
MR Imaging of Fetal Head and Neck Anomalies
Neuroimag Clin N Am 14 (2004) 273–291 MR imaging of fetal head and neck anomalies Caroline D. Robson, MB, ChBa,b,*, Carol E. Barnewolt, MDa,c aDepartment of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Boston, 300 Longwood Avenue, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA bMagnetic Resonance Imaging, Advanced Fetal Care Center, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA cFetal Imaging, Advanced Fetal Care Center, Children’s Hospital Boston, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA Fetal dysmorphism can occur as a result of var- primarily used for fetal MR imaging. When the fetal ious processes that include malformation (anoma- face is imaged, the sagittal view permits assessment lous formation of tissue), deformation (unusual of the frontal and nasal bones, hard palate, tongue, forces on normal tissue), disruption (breakdown of and mandible. Abnormalities include abnormal promi- normal tissue), and dysplasia (abnormal organiza- nence of the frontal bone (frontal bossing) and lack of tion of tissue). the usual frontal prominence. Abnormal nasal mor- An approach to fetal diagnosis and counseling of phology includes variations in the size and shape of the parents incorporates a detailed assessment of fam- the nose. Macroglossia and micrognathia are also best ily history, maternal health, and serum screening, re- diagnosed on sagittal images. sults of amniotic fluid analysis for karyotype and Coronal images are useful for evaluating the in- other parameters, and thorough imaging of the fetus tegrity of the fetal lips and palate and provide as- with sonography and sometimes fetal MR imaging. sessment of the eyes, nose, and ears. -
Chromosome 13 Introduction Chromosome 13 (As Well As Chromosomes 14, 15, 21 and 22) Is an Acrocentric Chromosome. Short Arms Of
Chromosome 13 ©Chromosome Disorder Outreach Inc. (CDO) Technical genetic content provided by Dr. Iosif Lurie, M.D. Ph.D Medical Geneticist and CDO Medical Consultant/Advisor. Ideogram courtesy of the University of Washington Department of Pathology: ©1994 David Adler.hum_13.gif Introduction Chromosome 13 (as well as chromosomes 14, 15, 21 and 22) is an acrocentric chromosome. Short arms of acrocentric chromosomes do not contain any genes. All genes are located in the long arm. The length of the long arm is ~95 Mb. It is ~3.5% of the total human genome. Chromosome 13 is a gene poor area. There are only 600–700 genes within this chromosome. Structural abnormalities of the long arm of chromosome 13 are very common. There are at least 750 patients with deletions of different segments of the long arm (including patients with an associated imbalance for another chromosome). There are several syndromes associated with deletions of the long arm of chromosome 13. One of these syndromes is caused by deletions of 13q14 and neighboring areas. The main manifestation of this syndrome is retinoblastoma. Deletions of 13q32 and neighboring areas cause multiple defects of the brain, eye, heart, kidney, genitalia and extremities. The syndrome caused by this deletion is well known since the 1970’s. Distal deletions of 13q33q34 usually do not produce serious malformations. Deletions of the large area between 13q21 and 13q31 do not produce any stabile and well–recognized syndromes. Deletions of Chromosome 13 Chromosome 13 (as well as chromosomes 14, 15, 21 and 22) belongs to the group of acrocentric chromosomes. -
Neuropathology Review.Pdf
Neuropathology Review Richard A. Prayson, MD Humana Press Contents NEUROPATHOLOGY REVIEW 2 Contents Contents NEUROPATHOLOGY REVIEW By RICHARD A. PRAYSON, MD Department of Anatomic Pathology Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH HUMANA PRESS TOTOWA, NEW JERSEY 4 Contents © 2001 Humana Press Inc. 999 Riverview Drive, Suite 208 Totowa, New Jersey 07512 For additional copies, pricing for bulk purchases, and/or information about other Humana titles, contact Humana at the above address or at any of the following numbers: Tel.: 973-256-1699; Fax: 973-256-8341; E-mail:[email protected]; Website: http://humanapress.com All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording, or otherwise without written permission from the Publisher. Due diligence has been taken by the publishers, editors, and authors of this book to assure the accuracy of the information published and to describe generally accepted practices. The contributors herein have carefully checked to ensure that the drug selections and dosages set forth in this text are accurate and in accord with the standards accepted at the time of publication. Notwithstanding, as new research, changes in government regulations, and knowledge from clinical experience relating to drug therapy and drug reactions constantly occurs, the reader is advised to check the product information provided by the manufacturer of each drug for any change in dosages or for additional warnings and contraindications. This is of utmost importance when the recommended drug herein is a new or infrequently used drug. It is the responsibility of the treating physician to determine dosages and treatment strategies for individual patients. -
Appendix 3.1 Birth Defects Descriptions for NBDPN Core, Recommended, and Extended Conditions Updated March 2017
Appendix 3.1 Birth Defects Descriptions for NBDPN Core, Recommended, and Extended Conditions Updated March 2017 Participating members of the Birth Defects Definitions Group: Lorenzo Botto (UT) John Carey (UT) Cynthia Cassell (CDC) Tiffany Colarusso (CDC) Janet Cragan (CDC) Marcia Feldkamp (UT) Jamie Frias (CDC) Angela Lin (MA) Cara Mai (CDC) Richard Olney (CDC) Carol Stanton (CO) Csaba Siffel (GA) Table of Contents LIST OF BIRTH DEFECTS ................................................................................................................................................. I DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF BIRTH DEFECTS ...................................................................................................... 1 FORMAT FOR BIRTH DEFECT DESCRIPTIONS ................................................................................................................................. 1 CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM ....................................................................................................................................... 2 ANENCEPHALY ........................................................................................................................................................................ 2 ENCEPHALOCELE ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 HOLOPROSENCEPHALY............................................................................................................................................................. -
The Cyclops and the Mermaid: an Epidemiological Study of Two Types
30 0 Med Genet 1992; 29: 30-35 The cyclops and the mermaid: an epidemiological study of two types of rare J Med Genet: first published as 10.1136/jmg.29.1.30 on 1 January 1992. Downloaded from malformation* Bengt Kallen, Eduardo E Castilla, Paul A L Lancaster, Osvaldo Mutchinick, Lisbeth B Knudsen, Maria Luisa Martinez-Frias, Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo, Elisabeth Robert Abstract complex depends on which forms are in- Infants with cyclopia or sirenomelia are cluded, and also on the frequency with which born at an approximate rate of 1 in necropsy is performed on infants dying in the 100 000 births. Eight malformation moni- neonatal period. However, the two extreme toring systems around the world jointly forms, cyclopia and sirenomelia, are easily Department of studied the epidemiology of these rare recognised and usually clearly defined, but Embryology, University of Lund, malformations: 102 infants with cyclopia, both forms are very rare and it is therefore Biskopsgatan 7, S-223 96 with sirenomelia, and one with both difficult to collect material large enough to 62 Lund, Sweden. conditions were identified among nearly permit detailed epidemiological studies. B Kalln 10-1 million births. Maternal age is some- We have collected such material by using ECLAMC/Genetica/ what increased for cyclopia, indicating data from eight malformation monitoring sys- Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and the likely inclusion of some chromoso- tems around the world, all members of the IMBICE, Casilla 403, mally abnormal infants which were not International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects 1900 La Plata, identified. About half of the infants are Monitoring Systems,7 and we report some Argentina. -
Skull & CNS Malformation Craniosynostosis
Module: Skull & CNS Malformation Craniosynostosis CONGENITAL DISORDERS Celia H. Chang, MD Acting Chief of the Division of Child Neurology Associate Health Sciences Clinical Professor of Neurology Department of Neurology, MIND Institute University of California, Davis, Health System [email protected] Question Based Learning Lecture Modules Skull & CNS Malformations Developmental Issues Neurocutaneous Syndromes Source: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1175957- overview#a0104. Notes: Comprehensive Review of Neurologic and Psychiatric Disorders: Congenital Disorders Celia Chang © 2011-2012 BeatTheBoards.com 877-225-8384 1 Craniosynostosis cont’d Frontal Bossing Incidence .04% - .1%, usually sporadic Primary 2%-8% Sagittal 50%-58% >scaphocephaly Coronal 20%-30% >frontal plagiocephaly, unil. Metopic 4%-10% >trigonocephaly Lambdoid 2%-4% Syndromic: genetic 21% with 86% single gene, 15% chromosomal FGFR2 on chr 10 (32%) AD: Apert, Pfeiffer, Crouzon FGFR3 (25%) AD: Muenke and Crouzon with acanthosis nigrans TWIST 1 (19%) AD: Saethre-Chotzen EFNB1 (7%) X-linked: craniofrontonasal syndrome, worse in females Secondary: due to lack of brain growth Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH000257/ www.nature.com/ejhg/journal/v19/n4/full/ejhg2010235a.html. Source: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/ency/images/ency/fullsi Causes of Microcephaly ze/17183.jpg. Infection In utero Increased Fluid Spaces Postnatal Hydrocephalus In utero drug exposure Communicating Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy Noncommunicating -
Ocular Coloboma: a Reassessment in the Age of Molecular Neuroscience
881 REVIEW Ocular coloboma: a reassessment in the age of molecular neuroscience C Y Gregory-Evans, M J Williams, S Halford, K Gregory-Evans ............................................................................................................................... J Med Genet 2004;41:881–891. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.025494 Congenital colobomata of the eye are important causes of NORMAL EYE DEVELOPMENT The processes that occur during formation of the childhood visual impairment and blindness. Ocular vertebrate eye are well documented and include coloboma can be seen in isolation and in an impressive (i) multiple inductive and morphogenetic events, number of multisystem syndromes, where the eye (ii) proliferation and differentiation of cells into mature tissue, and (iii) establishment of neural phenotype is often seen in association with severe networks connecting the retina to the higher neurological or craniofacial anomalies or other systemic neural centres such as the superior colliculus, the developmental defects. Several studies have shown that, in geniculate nucleus, and the occipital lobes.8–10 At around day 30 of gestation, the ventral surface addition to inheritance, environmental influences may be of the optic vesicle and stalk invaginates leading causative factors. Through work to identify genes to the formation of a double-layered optic cup. underlying inherited coloboma, significant inroads are This invagination gives rise to the optic fissure, allowing blood vessels from the vascular meso- being made into understanding the molecular events derm to enter the developing eye. Fusion of the controlling closure of the optic fissure. In general, severity edges of this fissure starts centrally at about of disease can be linked to the temporal expression of the 5 weeks and proceeds anteriorly towards the rim of the optic cup and posteriorly along the optic gene, but this is modified by factors such as tissue stalk, with completion by 7 weeks.11 Failure of specificity of gene expression and genetic redundancy. -
Sirenomelia: an Epidemiologic Study in a Large Dataset from the International Clearinghouse of Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and Literature Review IEˆ DA M
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by PUblication MAnagement American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C (Seminars in Medical Genetics) 157:358–373 (2011) ARTICLE Sirenomelia: An Epidemiologic Study in a Large Dataset From the International Clearinghouse of Birth Defects Surveillance and Research, and Literature Review IEˆ DA M. ORIOLI,1,2Ã EMMANUELLE AMAR,3 JAZMIN ARTEAGA-VAZQUEZ,4 MARIAN K. BAKKER,5 SEBASTIANO BIANCA,6 LORENZO D. BOTTO,7,8 MAURIZIO CLEMENTI,9 ADOLFO CORREA,10 MELINDA CSAKY-SZUNYOGH,11 EMANUELE LEONCINI,12 ZHU LI,13 JORGE S. LO´ PEZ-CAMELO,2,14 R. BRIAN LOWRY,15 LISA MARENGO,16 MARI´A-LUISA MARTI´NEZ-FRI´AS,17,18,19 PIERPAOLO MASTROIACOVO,12 MARGERY MORGAN,20 ANNA PIERINI,21 ANNUKKA RITVANEN,22 GIOACCHINO SCARANO,23 24 2,14,25 ELENA SZABOVA, AND EDUARDO E. CASTILLA, 1ECLAMC (Estudo Colaborativo Latino Americano de Malformac¸o˜es Congeˆnitas) at Departamento de Gene´tica, Instituto de Biologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2INAGEMP (Instituto Nacional de Gene´tica Me´dica Populacional), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 3Rhone-Alps Registry of Birth Defects REMERA, Lyon, France 4Departamento de Gene´tica, RYVEMCE (Registro y Vigilancia Epidemiolo´gica de Malformaciones Conge´nitas), Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Me´dicas y Nutricio´n ‘‘Salvador Zubira´n’’, Me´xico City, Mexico 5Eurocat Northern Netherlands, Department of Genetics, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands 6Dipartimento Materno Infantile, Centro di Consulenza Genetica e di Teratologia della Riproduzione,