Robotics and Perception Robotics and Perception

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Robotics and Perception Robotics and Perception ROBOTICS AND PERCEPTION ROBOTICS AND PERCEPTION ROBOTICS Combining Probabilities, Failures and Safety in Robot Control Alberto Finzi, Fiora Pirri DIS - Universita` degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza” Via Salaria 113, 00198, Roma, Italy { finzi,pirri }@dis.uniroma1.it Abstract Situation Calculus with stochastic actions and events so that different possible runs, for a given sequence of actions, can We present a formal framework for treating both incom- be obtained. However we preserve the core ontology of the plete information in the initial database and possible fail- Situation Calculus in which actions are deterministic and the ures during an agent’s execution of a course of actions. whole dynamic of change is idealized. In fact, each run of These two aspects of uncertainty are formalized by two stochastic actions is obtained as an expansion of a fixed se- different notions of probability. We introduce also a con- quence of deterministic actions. An expansion is formed by cept of expected probability, which is obtained by com- considering both probability of success and failure for each bining the two previous notions. Expected probability ac- action, and exogenous events. We make a closed world hy- counts for the probability of a sentence on the hypothesis pothesis about exogenous events: the exogenous events are that the sequence of actions needed to make it true might all and only those fixed in the theory. Probability of events is have failed. Expected probability leads to the possibility empirical, it accounts for the relative frequency of properties of comparing courses of actions and verifying which is of events like the usual failures of an agent, due to its normal more safe. behavior or the circumstances under which it operates. The probability of a sentence depends only on the amount 1 Introduction of information available in the initial database, i.e. with state Uncertainty, both about the domain in which a robot has to descriptions. Probability of actions, on the other hand, de- operate and about the effective sequence of actions it is ex- pends on properties of events, like a robot behavior. With the ecuting, is one of the most crucial problem that cognitive notion of expected probability we combine the two former robotics has to face in robot control. In this paper we present notions (the logical and frequency ones) into a new proba- a formal framework for dealing with uncertainty both in the bility that can account for the probability of a sentence af- initial database and during the execution of a course of ac- ter the execution of a course of actions, in the hypothe- tions: actions can fail. The failure of an action can lead to ex- sis that this sequence can fail in several different ways and ogenous events, e.g. if the agent fails to pick up a block then exogenous actions can occur. This idea captures in some sense the dynamic execution under incomplete information the exogenous event that the block falls to the floor can take [ ] place. The complete framework is designed for autonomous ( 8 ). An example is the probability that the screwdriver manipulators endowed with perception. Perception, in fact, is on the floor, given that the action the robot has to exe- can be used to diagnose what really happened during a failed cute is to pick it up, and its goal is holding it in its hand. execution (a similar approach is taken in [9]). Here, leaving Expected probability, combining the two previous probabil- perception aside, we shall concentrate on the different aspects ities, gives a measure of safety of a sequence of actions concerning uncertainty: chosen to achieve a goal. Therefore it can be used to de- 1. Incomplete initial information. The most prominent log- termine whether a course of actions is more safe than an- ical approaches to probability are [14; 4] and [11; 1; 21; other one. The notion of safety can be suitably extended to ] [ treat decision theory in the Situation Calculus (see e.g. [19; 13; 7; 17 . We introduce in the Situation Calculus 15; ] 20] a formal theory, which turns out to be equivalent to 3 ). the possible world approach, under certain restrictions (e.g. [13]). Instead of possible worlds, we propose a suitable ax- 2 Preliminaries iomatization inducing possible state descriptions [4] therefore We consider the Situation Calculus (SC)([15; 20])asthe relying on a classical semantics. Probability of sentences is core of our logic and language, and we suitably extend it to entailed by the axiomatization. We do not provide nested include new sorts, new symbols for its alphabet and new ax- probabilities. ioms. We refer the interested reader to [18] for a full pre- 2. Incomplete information for a course of actions, and ex- sentation of the core logic and language and [9] for more ogenous events. A logical approach to failures has been details related to the extensions concerning probability on presented in [2]. In general, the problem of failures during events. The core consists of the three sorts: action, situa- the execution of plans is thoroughly treated in the planning tion and object = worldEntities ∪ genericObjects.Here community (see e.g. [16; 12]. To cope with the non deter- the sort genericObject is a catch-all that can include any ministic effect of actions during the execution of a plan, say, possible additional sorts needed in an application, like the we extend the classical language and axiomatization of the reals or sets. We have extended the core with three new ROBOTICS AND PERCEPTION 1331 sorts: outcome, stochasticAction, event. The sort event con- The initial database DS0 There are properties of the do- sists of two sub-sorts, event = condEvent ∪ seqEvent. main that the initial database has to represent. We list some Observe that the sorted domain D could be infinite or un- of them, where x is complement of x: countable even if some of its subsets is finite. For example 1 ¬ ( ) we are interested in imposing a finite domain for world en- . Receiver x, n, S0 2.Source(x, n, S0) →¬Source(x, n, S0) tities, while we would require probabilities to range over the 3. ∃n.(∀n .n ≤ n→∃ySource(y,n ,S0))∧ reals. We shall use the following alphabet, with subscripts and superscripts, to denote terms: a, for variables of sort ac- (∀x∀n .n >n→¬Source(x, n, S0)) tion; s, for variables of sort situation; sta, for variables of The first axiom says that no string of bits is at the Receiver sort stochastic action; e, for variables of sort event; w for in S0. The second says that at the source there is always one variables of the sub-sort seqEvent and u for variables of fixed bit in position n, the last specifies that the length of the sub-sort condEvent; p, for variables of sort object de- the string at the source is a priori fixed. Here for example we noting probabilities and x, y, z..., for variables of sort object can fix ∀x¬Source(x, 4,S0). The following constrains to the (these might be further distinguished, e.g for terms of sort strings in Source arealsoinDS . worldEntity). The family of terms over SC and the set 0 L C1.Ifabitb is in position n>2, b is either in position n − 1 of formulae SC over SC are inductively defined as usual. − 2 In particular a basic sentence is one formed only by fluents, or in position n : ∃ ∀ ( ( )→ ( )) e.g. x y P x, S0 Q x, y, S0 , in which fluents take as Source(x, n, S0) ∧ n>2 → argument only elements of sort worldEntities (we). A sen- Source(x, n − 1,S0) ∨ Source(x, n − 2,S0) tence uniform in σ is one in which no variable, free or quan- tified, of sort situation is mentioned. E.g. ∃sP (t, s) is not C2.Ifabitb is in position n =2, b is in position n =1: uniform and ∃x(P (t, do(transmit(x),S0))), is uniform in Source(x, n, S0) ∧ n =2→ Source(x, n − 1,S0) σ = do(transmit(x),S0). Omitted quantifiers are always universal quantifiers. For example: 011 is a legal string. 001 and 111 are not. Fi- nally some axioms will state that bits, which we denote by 3 The Basic Theory of Actions b are limited to 1 and 0, and positions, which we denote by n, constitute a finite set of natural number. Both the sets are The notions related to a basic theory of action with its set ordered and pairwise disjoint. of foundational axioms and domain description axioms, are presented in detail in [20] and in [18]. These axioms represent an agent’s prior knowledge about its domain of application, Successor State Axioms The successor state axiom for and its behavior, and are denoted by the following: Receiver is: Receiver(x, n, do(a, s)) ≡ DS ∪Dssa ∪Duna ∪Dap ∪ Σ. 0 (a = transmit(n) ∧ Source(x, n, S0))∨ D ( = ( ) ∧ ( 0)) Here, S0 is the initial database, describing what properties a distort n Source x, n, S hold initially about the objects in the domain. Dssa ∪Dap specify, respectively, the successor state axioms and the ac- 4 Incomplete initial information tion precondition axioms. Σ is the set of foundational axioms D If the initial database S0 is incomplete (see [20; 10]), we can for situations, and Duna ensures the uniqueness of each ac- D |= assign a probability to those statements ψ, s.t. S0 ψ. So, tion. We present in the following a simple example to illus- for example, if a goal G is given, we might be interested in trate the basic ontology.
Recommended publications
  • GURPS4E Ultra-Tech.Qxp
    Written by DAVID PULVER, with KENNETH PETERS Additional Material by WILLIAM BARTON, LOYD BLANKENSHIP, and STEVE JACKSON Edited by CHRISTOPHER AYLOTT, STEVE JACKSON, SEAN PUNCH, WIL UPCHURCH, and NIKOLA VRTIS Cover Art by SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Illustrated by JESSE DEGRAFF, IGOR FIORENTINI, SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, E. JON NETHERLAND, AARON PANAGOS, CHRISTOPHER SHY, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Stock # 31-0104 Version 1.0 – May 22, 2007 STEVE JACKSON GAMES CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 4 Adjusting for SM . 16 PERSONAL GEAR AND About the Authors . 4 EQUIPMENT STATISTICS . 16 CONSUMER GOODS . 38 About GURPS . 4 Personal Items . 38 2. CORE TECHNOLOGIES . 18 Clothing . 38 1. ULTRA-TECHNOLOGY . 5 POWER . 18 Entertainment . 40 AGES OF TECHNOLOGY . 6 Power Cells. 18 Recreation and TL9 – The Microtech Age . 6 Generators . 20 Personal Robots. 41 TL10 – The Robotic Age . 6 Energy Collection . 20 TL11 – The Age of Beamed and 3. COMMUNICATIONS, SENSORS, Exotic Matter . 7 Broadcast Power . 21 AND MEDIA . 42 TL12 – The Age of Miracles . 7 Civilization and Power . 21 COMMUNICATION AND INTERFACE . 42 Even Higher TLs. 7 COMPUTERS . 21 Communicators. 43 TECH LEVEL . 8 Hardware . 21 Encryption . 46 Technological Progression . 8 AI: Hardware or Software? . 23 Receive-Only or TECHNOLOGY PATHS . 8 Software . 24 Transmit-Only Comms. 46 Conservative Hard SF. 9 Using a HUD . 24 Translators . 47 Radical Hard SF . 9 Ubiquitous Computing . 25 Neural Interfaces. 48 CyberPunk . 9 ROBOTS AND TOTAL CYBORGS . 26 Networks . 49 Nanotech Revolution . 9 Digital Intelligences. 26 Mail and Freight . 50 Unlimited Technology. 9 Drones . 26 MEDIA AND EDUCATION . 51 Emergent Superscience .
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation and Development of Life Saving Research Robots
    Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Pundru Srinivasa Rao, 2014 ISSN 2278 – 0149 www.ijmerr.com Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2014 © 2014 IJMERR. All Rights Reserved Research Paper INVESTIGATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE SAVING RESEARCH ROBOTS Pundru Srinivasa Rao1* *Corresponding Author: Pundru Srinivasa Rao, [email protected] This paper investigates life saving and time saving research robots which are installed in industry, military, space, hospital, medical, surgical, home, echo friendly, inspection, public and security system for performing labour and life saving jobs. At present, new types of robots are being developed in laboratories and much of the researches on robotics are focuses not on specific industrial tasks, but on investigations into new types of robots. And also focuses the alternative ways to think about the design of robots and its manufacturing process. The main goals of Research robots such as nano-robots/soft-robots/super-robots/swarm-robots/hap-tic-Interface- robots are as small as viruses, to cure the cancer and protect other sophisticated parts of the human body. The physical structures of these robots are like amoeba, which can move/roll/ jump and change its configuration such as assembling and disassembling of its components, which depends on its requirement. It is very difficult to operate accurately therefore increasing the mobility, stability and precision, several smart materials, smart actuators and sensors are to be used to sense and react to the effect of environmental inputs, and to stimulate the devices. It is expected that these new type of robots will be able to solve real world problems when they are finally realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_manufacturing Molecular nanotechnology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Molecular manufacturing) Part of the article series on Molecular nanotechnology (MNT) is the concept of Nanotechnology topics Molecular Nanotechnology engineering functional mechanical systems at the History · Implications Applications · Organizations molecular scale.[1] An equivalent definition would be Molecular assembler Popular culture · List of topics "machines at the molecular scale designed and built Mechanosynthesis Subfields and related fields atom-by-atom". This is distinct from nanoscale Nanorobotics Nanomedicine materials. Based on Richard Feynman's vision of Molecular self-assembly Grey goo miniature factories using nanomachines to build Molecular electronics K. Eric Drexler complex products (including additional Scanning probe microscopy Engines of Creation Nanolithography nanomachines), this advanced form of See also: Nanotechnology Molecular nanotechnology [2] nanotechnology (or molecular manufacturing ) Nanomaterials would make use of positionally-controlled Nanomaterials · Fullerene mechanosynthesis guided by molecular machine systems. MNT would involve combining Carbon nanotubes physical principles demonstrated by chemistry, other nanotechnologies, and the molecular Nanotube membranes machinery Fullerene chemistry Applications · Popular culture Timeline · Carbon allotropes Nanoparticles · Quantum dots Colloidal gold · Colloidal
    [Show full text]
  • Uses of Nanorobotics Technology
    Volume II, Issue IV, APRIL 2013 IJLTEMAS ISSN 2278 - 2540 USES OF NANOROBOTICS TECHNOLOGY Dr. Gaurav Kumar Jain Deepshikha Group of Colleges [email protected] Mr. Sandeep Joshi Deepshikha Group of Colleges Mr. Ravi Ranjan Deepshikha Group of Colleges ABSTRACT Illnesses such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases Nanorobotics is the technology of creating continue to ravage people around the world. machines or robots at or close to the microscopic scale of a nanometer (10−9 NANOROBOTICS THEORY:- meters). More specifically, nanorobotics refers to the still largely hypothetical Since nanorobots would be microscopic in nanotechnology engineering discipline of size, it would probably be necessary for very designing and building nanorobots, devices large numbers of them to work together to ranging in size from 0.1-10 micrometers and perform microscopic and macroscopic tasks. constructed of nanoscale or molecular These nanorobot swarms, both those which components. As no artificial non-biological are incapable of replication (as in utility fog) nanorobots have yet been created, they and those which are capable of remain a hypothetical concept. The names unconstrained replication in the natural nanobots, nanoids, nanites or nanomites also environment (as in grey goo and its less have been used to describe these common variants), are found in many hypothetical devices. science fiction stories, such as the Borg nanoprobes in Star Trek. The word KEY WORDS "nanobot" (also "nanite", "nanogene", or Nanorobot, approaches and Applications "nanoant") is often used to indicate this fictional context and is an informal or even INTRODUCTION pejorative term to refer to the engineering concept of nanorobots.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Fog: a Universal Physical Substance
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940022864 2018-09-18T22:10:35+00:00Z N94- 27367 UTILITY FOG: A UNIVERSAL PHYSICAL SUBSTANCE J. Storm Hall Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey Abstract tern of robots, which vary their properties according to which part of the object they are representing at Active, polymorphic material ("Utility Fog") can the time. An object can then move across a cloud of be designed as a conglomeration of 100-micron robotic robots without the individual robots moving, just as cells (_foglets'). Such robots could be built with the pixels on a CRT remain stationary while pictures the techniques of molecular nanotechnology[18]. Con- move around on the screen. trollers with processing capabilities of 1000 MIPS per The Utility Fog which is simulating air needs to be cubic micron, and electric motors with power densities impalpable. One would like to be able to walk through of one milliwatt per cubic micron are assumed. Util- a Fog-filled room without the feeling of having been ity Fog should be capable of simulating most everyday cast into a block of solid Lucite. It is also desire- materials, dynamically changing its form and proper- able to be able to breathe while using the Fog in this ties, and forms a substrate for an integrated virtual way! To this end, the robots representing empty space reality said telerobotics. constantly run a fluid-flow simulation of what the air would be doing if the robots weren't there. Then each robot does what the air it displaces would do in its 1 Introduction absence.
    [Show full text]
  • Powered by Imagination: Nanobots at the Science Photo Library
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@Nottingham Powered by imagination: Nanobots at the Science Photo Library Brigitte Nerlich University of Nottingham Keywords: Nanobots, Nanotechnology, Science Fiction, Images Biographical note: Brigitte Nerlich is a Professor of Science, Language and Society at the Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham. She has worked in various fields, including, French, philosophy, linguistics and science and technology studies. She is particularly interested in the use of verbal and other imagery in discourses about new technologies and emerging diseases. 1 Powered by imagination: Nanobots at the Science Photo Library Brigitte Nerlich Institute for Science and Society Law and Social Sciences Building, West Wing University Park University of Nottingham Nottingham, NG7 2RD [email protected] „Imagination is not, as its etymology would suggest, the faculty of forming images of reality; it is rather the faculty of forming images which go beyond reality, which sing reality.‟ (Gaston Bachelard, 1971, p. 15) Introduction Over the last two decades, and particularly since the beginning of this century, the words „nanorobot‟ and „nanobot‟ have captured public imagination (see Nerlich, 2005), with the former being a scientifically slightly more „respectable‟ term than the latter. According to Webster's New Millennium™ Dictionary of English, the word nanobot was first used in 1989 to designate „a microscopic robot used in nanotechnology, a nano-robot; an extremely small autonomous self-propelled machine that may reproduce‟ (nanobot, n.d). Nanobots became popular following the publications in 1986 of Eric Drexler‟s book Engines of Creation, which first made nanotechnology a topic for public debate.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Impact of the Personal Nanofactory
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________N20FR06 Economic Impact of the Personal Nanofactory Robert A. Freitas Jr Institute for Molecular Manufacturing, Palo Alto, California, USA Is the advent of, and mass availability of, desktop personal nanofactories (PNs)1 likely to cause deflation (a persistent decline in the general prices of goods and services), inflation (a persistent general price increase), or neither? A definitive analysis would have to address: (1) the technical assumptions that are made, including as yet imprecisely defined future technological advances and the pace and order of their introduction; (2) the feedback-mediated dynamic responses of the macroeconomy in situations where we don’t have a lot of historical data to guide us; (3) the counter-leaning responses of existing power centers (corporate entities, wealthy owners/investors, influential political actors, antitechnology-driven activists, etc.) to the potential dilution of their power, influence, or interests, including their likely efforts to actively oppose or at least delay this potential dilution; (4) legal restrictions that may be placed on the widespread use of certain technological options, for reasons ranging from legitimate public safety and environmental concerns to crass political or commercial opportunism; (5) the possibility (having an as yet ill- defined probability) that nanotechnology might actually “break the system” and render conven- tional capitalism obsolete (much as solid state electronics obsoleted vacuum tubes), in which case it is not clear what new economic system might replace capitalism; and (6) the changes in human economic behavior that may result when human nature itself may have changed. A definitive answer is beyond the scope of this essay. Here, we take only a first look at the question.
    [Show full text]
  • Charismatic Leader’: a Phenomenology of Human Submission to Nonhuman Power 1
    The Social Robot as ‘Charismatic Leader’: A Phenomenology of Human Submission to Nonhuman Power 1 Matthew E. Gladden 2 CCPE, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA Abstract. Much has been written about the possibility of human trust in robots. In this article we consider a more specific relationship: that of a human follower’s obedience to a social robot who leads through the exercise of referent power and what Weber described as ‘charismatic authority.’ By studying robotic design efforts and literary depictions of robots, we suggest that human beings are striving to create charismatic robot leaders that will either (1) inspire us through their display of superior morality; (2) enthrall us through their possession of superhuman knowledge; or (3) seduce us with their romantic allure. Rejecting a contractarian-individualist approach which presumes that human beings will be able to consciously ‘choose’ particular robot leaders, we build on the phenomenological- social approach to trust in robots to argue that charismatic robot leaders will emerge naturally from our world’s social fabric, without any rational decision on our part. Finally, we argue that the stability of these leader-follower relations will hinge on a fundamental, unresolved question of robotic intelligence: is it possible for synthetic intelligences to exist that are morally, intellectually, and emotionally sophisticated enough to exercise charismatic authority over human beings—but not so sophisticated that they lose the desire to do so? Keywords. Social robotics, trust, obedience, philosophy of technology, innovation management, posthumanism Introduction There exists a rich body of thought that explores the nature and possibility of human trust in social robots.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Small Be Beautiful? Making Policies for Our Nanotech Future W
    History and Technology Vol. 21, No. 2, June 2005, pp. 177–203 Will Small be Beautiful? Making Policies for our Nanotech Future W. Patrick McCray TaylorGHAT110356.sgm10.1080/07341510500103735History0734-1512Original2005212000000JuneAssistantpmccray@history.ucsb.edu. and& and Article ProfessorW.McCrayFrancis (print)/1477-2620Francis Technology2005 Group Ltd Ltd (online) With the passage of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI) in 2000, US investment in nanotechnology research and development soared quickly to almost US$1 billion annu- ally. The NNI emerged at a salient point in US history as lawmakers worked to reshape national science policies in response to growing international economic competition and the increasing commercialization of academic science. This paper examines how advocates of nanotechnology successfully marketed their initiative. It pays especial attention to their opti- mistic depiction of societies and economies improved by nanotechnology, and considers why utopian techno-visions continue to flourish despite their tendency to ultimately disappoint. Keywords: Nanotechnology; Science Policy; Technological Utopias It was as if nanotechnology had gone through a phase transition; what had once been perceived as blue sky research … was now being seen as the key technology of the 21st century.1 On 24 October 2003, California politicians, academics, and civic leaders attended the groundbreaking ceremony for the California NanoSystems Institute in Santa Barbara. This US$55 million high-tech building, with its ultra-filtered clean rooms and modular laboratories, represented only a fraction of the burgeoning national investment in nanotechnology.2 Since 2000, when President William J. Clinton announced a new national initiative to foster the tools of the ‘next industrial revolution,’ dozens of universities and corporations have initiated programs where scientists and engineers research phenomena and technologies at the nanoscale.3 Following proclamations by Clinton and other leaders, government and commercial investment into nanotechnology soared.
    [Show full text]
  • Large-Product General -Purpose Design and Manufacturing Using Nanoscale Modules
    Final Report Large-Product General -Purpose Design and Manufacturing Using Nanoscale Modules NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts CP-04-01 Phase I Advanced Aeronautical/Space Concept Studies PriPrnicincpialpa Iln Ivnevstesigtiagtaotor:r :C hCrihsr iPs hoPheoneinxi x CoC-Ion-Ivnevstesigtiagtaor:tor :Ti Thaihmeamre Tor Tthot-Fh-Feejjelel MaMayy 2 2, ,2 2000055 1 Cover page: The computer-controlled NIAC desktop nanofactory (top figure) uses nanoscale machinery (lower right) to manufacture a molecularly precise 3-D product—a high performance water filter—out of nanoblocks made using bottom-up techniques, in this case synthesized from 2-layer silsesquioxane deriviatives (lower left). The authors wish to thank Eric Drexler, Jeffrey Soreff, and Robert Freitas for helpful comments on portions of this document. 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................. 3 Summary........................................................................................................... 5 Background 1. Incentives................................................................................................................8 1.1. Scaling laws............................................................................................... 8 1.2. Molecular Fabrication Advantages............................................................ 9 1.3. Exponential manufacturing ..................................................................... 11 1.4. Information delivery rate..........................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Military Nanotechnology and Comic Books
    Intertexts 9.1 Pages final 3/15/06 3:22 PM Page 77 Nanowarriors: Military Nanotechnology and Comic Books Colin Milburn U N I V E R S I T Y O F C A L I F O R N I A , D AV I S In February 2002, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology submitted a proposal to the U.S. Army for a new research center devoted to developing military equipment enhanced with nanotechnology. The Army Research Office had issued broad agency solicitations for such a center in October 2001, and they enthusiastically selected MIT’s proposal from among several candidates, awarding them $50 million to kick start what became dubbed the MIT Institute for Soldier Nanotechnologies (ISN). MIT’s proposal out- lined areas of nanoscience, polymer chemistry, and molecular engineering that could provide fruitful military applications in the near term, as well as more speculative applications in the future. It also featured the striking image of a mechanically armored woman warrior, standing amidst the mon- uments of some futuristic cityscape, packing two enormous guns and other assault devices (Figure 1). This image proved appealing enough beyond the proposal to grace the ISN’s earliest websites, and it also accompanied several publicity announcements for the institute’s inauguration. Figure 1: ISN Soldier of the Future. 2002. Reproduced with permission. Intertexts, Vol. 9, No. 1 2005 © Texas Tech University Press Intertexts 9.1 Pages final 3/15/06 3:22 PM Page 78 78 I N T E R T E X T S As this image disseminated, it wasn’t long before several comic book fans recognized similarities to the comic book Radix, created by the frater- nal team of Ray and Ben Lai (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Kinematic Cellular Automata Final Report
    Modeling Kinematic Cellular Automata Final Report NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts Phase I: CP-02-02 General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems Contract # P03-0984 Principal Investigator: Tihamer Toth-Fejel Consultants: Robert Freitas and Matt Moses April 30, 2004 1 Cover page: A Connector Subsystem of a KCA SRS (Kinematic Cellular Automata Self-Replicating System) preparing a part for assembly. Self-replicating systems could be used as an ultimate form of in situ resource utilization for terraforming planets. 2 Version: 4/30/2004 2:55 PM Table of Contents 1. ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................6 2. SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................7 2.1. TERMINOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 8 3. MOTIVATION AND JUSTIFICATION .....................................................................................8 3.1. WHY SELF-REPLICATION?....................................................................................................... 8 3.2. WHY NOT? ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.3. IS MACHINE SELF-REPLICATION POSSIBLE?.......................................................................... 10 3.4. ARE NANOSCALE SELF-REPLICATING MACHINES POSSIBLE?.................................................
    [Show full text]