DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling Kinematic Cellular Automata Final Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Modeling Kinematic Cellular Automata Final Report Modeling Kinematic Cellular Automata Final Report NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts Phase I: CP-02-02 General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems Contract # P03-0984 Principal Investigator: Tihamer Toth-Fejel Consultants: Robert Freitas and Matt Moses April 30, 2004 1 Cover page: A Connector Subsystem of a KCA SRS (Kinematic Cellular Automata Self-Replicating System) preparing a part for assembly. Self-replicating systems could be used as an ultimate form of in situ resource utilization for terraforming planets. 2 Version: 4/30/2004 2:55 PM Table of Contents 1. ABSTRACT ..................................................................................................................................6 2. SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................7 2.1. TERMINOLOGY........................................................................................................................ 8 3. MOTIVATION AND JUSTIFICATION .....................................................................................8 3.1. WHY SELF-REPLICATION?....................................................................................................... 8 3.2. WHY NOT? ............................................................................................................................. 9 3.3. IS MACHINE SELF-REPLICATION POSSIBLE?.......................................................................... 10 3.4. ARE NANOSCALE SELF-REPLICATING MACHINES POSSIBLE?.................................................. 10 3.5. WHY NOT SELF-ASSEMBLY?................................................................................................. 11 3.6. WHY OR WHY NOT UNIVERSAL CONSTRUCTORS?.................................................................. 12 3.7. WHY THE “GENOTYPE + RIBOTYPE = PHENOTYPE” PARADIGM?............................................ 13 3.8. WHY MODULAR ROBOTS? .................................................................................................... 13 3.9. WHY KINEMATIC CELLULAR AUTOMATA MODULES?........................................................... 15 3.10. WHY BOTH MACRO AND NANO SCALE?................................................................................ 16 3.11. WHY NOW? .......................................................................................................................... 16 4. RELATED AND PREVIOUS WORK .......................................................................................16 5. BENEFITS AND APPLICATIONS ...........................................................................................20 5.1. PROGRAMMABLE MATERIALS............................................................................................... 20 5.1.1. Flow Mode...................................................................................................................20 5.1.2. Pixelated Mode.............................................................................................................22 5.1.3. Computation Mode.......................................................................................................22 5.2. SEVEN MAGNITUDES IMPROVEMENT .................................................................................... 23 5.3. INDUSTRIAL EXPANSION....................................................................................................... 24 5.4. SPACE EXPLORATION AND DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................ 24 5.4.1. Spin-offs.......................................................................................................................24 5.4.2. Orbital Operations .......................................................................................................25 5.4.3. Exploration ..................................................................................................................25 5.4.4. Base Establishment.......................................................................................................25 5.4.5. Terraforming................................................................................................................26 6. PROJECT GOALS.....................................................................................................................27 6.1. CHARACTERIZE SELF-REPLICATION...................................................................................... 27 6.2. QUANTIFY THE COMPLEXITY OF KCA SRS ........................................................................... 27 6.3. CONFIRM APPROACH............................................................................................................. 28 6.4. DESIGN A KCA SRS ............................................................................................................. 28 6.5. SIMULATE DESIGNS............................................................................................................... 28 7. PROJECT STRATEGY .............................................................................................................28 7.1. HYBRIDIZE TWO SELF-REPLICATION MODELS ........................................................................ 28 7.2. KEEP IT SIMPLE..................................................................................................................... 28 7.3. MAKE IT COMPLICATED ........................................................................................................ 28 7.4. REFINE APPROACH BY ATTEMPTING TO DESIGN..................................................................... 28 7.5. IMITATE COMPUTERS ............................................................................................................ 29 7.6. IMITATE BIOLOGY ................................................................................................................. 29 8. ACCOMPLISHMENTS .............................................................................................................29 9. CHARACTERIZING THE SELF-ASSEMBLY AND SELF-REPLICATION SPACE..........30 9.1. 137-DIMENSION DESIGN SPACE ............................................................................................ 30 9.1.1. New Dimensions...........................................................................................................32 9.2. LESSONS FROM BIOLOGY...................................................................................................... 33 3 10. QUANTIFYING THE COMPLEXITY OF KCA SRS..............................................................33 11. CONFIRMING OR REFUTING THE APPROACH................................................................34 12. PRELIMINARY DESIGN APPROACH. ..................................................................................35 12.1. LISTENING TO JOHN VON NEUMANN..................................................................................... 35 12.2. DR. FEYNMAN’S ERROR........................................................................................................ 35 12.3. THE ESSENTIAL RESEARCH PROBLEM ................................................................................... 37 13. HIERARCHY .............................................................................................................................37 13.1. COMPARING THE MOSES UCP AND THE KCA SRS................................................................ 39 14. SUBSYSTEMS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS............................................................................40 14.1. TRANSPORTER SUBSYSTEM................................................................................................... 40 14.2. CONNECTOR SUBSYSTEM...................................................................................................... 41 14.3. CONTROLLER SUBSYSTEM .................................................................................................... 43 15. CELL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS...........................................................................................47 15.1. STRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................... 48 15.2. ACTUATORS.......................................................................................................................... 49 15.3. SENSORS............................................................................................................................... 50 15.4. LOGIC UNIT .......................................................................................................................... 53 15.4.1. Instruction Set for Logic Unit .......................................................................................54 15.4.2. Logic Unit Trade-offs ...................................................................................................54 15.5. A ROUGH SPECTRUM OF ASSEMBLY METHODS ..................................................................... 55 15.6. SELF-ASSEMBLY IN MOLECULAR ELECTRONICS ................................................................... 56 16. FACET DESIGN REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................................60 17. SOFTWARE SIMULATION .....................................................................................................60 17.1. FACET ANIMATION ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GURPS4E Ultra-Tech.Qxp
    Written by DAVID PULVER, with KENNETH PETERS Additional Material by WILLIAM BARTON, LOYD BLANKENSHIP, and STEVE JACKSON Edited by CHRISTOPHER AYLOTT, STEVE JACKSON, SEAN PUNCH, WIL UPCHURCH, and NIKOLA VRTIS Cover Art by SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Illustrated by JESSE DEGRAFF, IGOR FIORENTINI, SIMON LISSAMAN, DREW MORROW, E. JON NETHERLAND, AARON PANAGOS, CHRISTOPHER SHY, BOB STEVLIC, and JOHN ZELEZNIK Stock # 31-0104 Version 1.0 – May 22, 2007 STEVE JACKSON GAMES CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 4 Adjusting for SM . 16 PERSONAL GEAR AND About the Authors . 4 EQUIPMENT STATISTICS . 16 CONSUMER GOODS . 38 About GURPS . 4 Personal Items . 38 2. CORE TECHNOLOGIES . 18 Clothing . 38 1. ULTRA-TECHNOLOGY . 5 POWER . 18 Entertainment . 40 AGES OF TECHNOLOGY . 6 Power Cells. 18 Recreation and TL9 – The Microtech Age . 6 Generators . 20 Personal Robots. 41 TL10 – The Robotic Age . 6 Energy Collection . 20 TL11 – The Age of Beamed and 3. COMMUNICATIONS, SENSORS, Exotic Matter . 7 Broadcast Power . 21 AND MEDIA . 42 TL12 – The Age of Miracles . 7 Civilization and Power . 21 COMMUNICATION AND INTERFACE . 42 Even Higher TLs. 7 COMPUTERS . 21 Communicators. 43 TECH LEVEL . 8 Hardware . 21 Encryption . 46 Technological Progression . 8 AI: Hardware or Software? . 23 Receive-Only or TECHNOLOGY PATHS . 8 Software . 24 Transmit-Only Comms. 46 Conservative Hard SF. 9 Using a HUD . 24 Translators . 47 Radical Hard SF . 9 Ubiquitous Computing . 25 Neural Interfaces. 48 CyberPunk . 9 ROBOTS AND TOTAL CYBORGS . 26 Networks . 49 Nanotech Revolution . 9 Digital Intelligences. 26 Mail and Freight . 50 Unlimited Technology. 9 Drones . 26 MEDIA AND EDUCATION . 51 Emergent Superscience .
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation and Development of Life Saving Research Robots
    Int. J. Mech. Eng. & Rob. Res. 2014 Pundru Srinivasa Rao, 2014 ISSN 2278 – 0149 www.ijmerr.com Vol. 3, No. 2, April 2014 © 2014 IJMERR. All Rights Reserved Research Paper INVESTIGATION AND DEVELOPMENT OF LIFE SAVING RESEARCH ROBOTS Pundru Srinivasa Rao1* *Corresponding Author: Pundru Srinivasa Rao, [email protected] This paper investigates life saving and time saving research robots which are installed in industry, military, space, hospital, medical, surgical, home, echo friendly, inspection, public and security system for performing labour and life saving jobs. At present, new types of robots are being developed in laboratories and much of the researches on robotics are focuses not on specific industrial tasks, but on investigations into new types of robots. And also focuses the alternative ways to think about the design of robots and its manufacturing process. The main goals of Research robots such as nano-robots/soft-robots/super-robots/swarm-robots/hap-tic-Interface- robots are as small as viruses, to cure the cancer and protect other sophisticated parts of the human body. The physical structures of these robots are like amoeba, which can move/roll/ jump and change its configuration such as assembling and disassembling of its components, which depends on its requirement. It is very difficult to operate accurately therefore increasing the mobility, stability and precision, several smart materials, smart actuators and sensors are to be used to sense and react to the effect of environmental inputs, and to stimulate the devices. It is expected that these new type of robots will be able to solve real world problems when they are finally realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Interview with Mark Tilden (Photo Courtesy of Wowwee Ltd.) Wowwee Courtesy of (Photo
    APPENDIX ■ ■ ■ Interview with Mark Tilden (Photo courtesy of WowWee Ltd.) WowWee courtesy of (Photo Figure A-1. Here’s Mark Tilden at the 2005 New York Toy Fair. I have used excerpts from this interview throughout the book where applicable, but I also wanted to print it in its entirety. Some things, like Mark’s wonderful commentary on Hong Kong cuisine and his off-the-cuff comments on everything and anything, just didn’t fit into the structure of The Robosapien Companion, but they will be of interest to anyone who is curious about or admires the man behind the robots. 291 292 APPENDIX ■ INTERVIEW WITH MARK TILDEN This interview was conducted on February 13, 2005, at Wolfgang’s Steakhouse in the Murray Hill neighborhood of midtown Manhattan, in New York City. I recorded it with an Olympus DM-10 voice recorder. The dining room at Wolfgang’s is known for its historic tiled ceilings designed by Raphael Guastavino. They are beautiful, but they are an acoustic night- mare! Fortunately, my trusty DM-10 was up to the task. I have edited this only very lightly, mainly breaks where we spoke to waiters and so on. Also note that during a portion of this interview, Mark is showing me a slideshow on a little portable LCD screen. Most of the pictures from the slideshow ended up in Chapter 3. But if during the interview he seems to be making a reference, chances are it is to something on the screen. Without further ado, here is the full text of the interview.
    [Show full text]
  • The Design of "Living" Biomech Machines: How Low Can One Go?
    The Design of "Living" Biomech Machines: How low can one go? VBUG 1.5 "WALKMAN" Single battery. 0.7Kg. metal/plastic construction. Unibody frame. 5 tactile, 2 visual sensors. Control Core: 8 transistor Nv. 4 tran. Nu, 22 tran. motor. Total: 32 transistors. Behaviors: - High speed walking convergence. - powerful enviro. adaptive abilities - strong, accurate phototaxis. - 3 gaits; stop, walk, dig. - backup/explore ability. Mark W. Tilden Physics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory <[email protected]> 505/667-2902 July, 1997 "So... what you guys have done is find a way to get useful work out of non-linear dynamics?" - Dr. Bob Shelton, NASA. Abstract Following three years of study into experimental Nervous Net (Nv) control devices, various successes and several amusing failures have implied some general principles on the nature of capable control systems for autonomous machines and perhaps, we conjecture, even biological organisms. These systems are minimal, elegant, and, depending upon their implementation in a "creature" structure, astonishingly robust. Their only problem seems to be that as they are collections of non-linear asynchronous elements, only a very complex analysis can adequately extract and explain the emergent competency of their operation. On the other hand, this could imply a cheap, self-programing engineering technology for autonomous machines capable of performing unattended work for years at a time, on earth and in space. Discussion, background and examples are given. Introduction to Biomorphic Design A Biomorphic robot (from the Greek for "of a living form") is a self-contained mechanical device fashioned on the assumption that chaotic reaction, not predictive forward modeling, is appropriate and sufficient for sustained "survival" in unspecified and unstructured environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Molecular nanotechnology - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molecular_manufacturing Molecular nanotechnology From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from Molecular manufacturing) Part of the article series on Molecular nanotechnology (MNT) is the concept of Nanotechnology topics Molecular Nanotechnology engineering functional mechanical systems at the History · Implications Applications · Organizations molecular scale.[1] An equivalent definition would be Molecular assembler Popular culture · List of topics "machines at the molecular scale designed and built Mechanosynthesis Subfields and related fields atom-by-atom". This is distinct from nanoscale Nanorobotics Nanomedicine materials. Based on Richard Feynman's vision of Molecular self-assembly Grey goo miniature factories using nanomachines to build Molecular electronics K. Eric Drexler complex products (including additional Scanning probe microscopy Engines of Creation Nanolithography nanomachines), this advanced form of See also: Nanotechnology Molecular nanotechnology [2] nanotechnology (or molecular manufacturing ) Nanomaterials would make use of positionally-controlled Nanomaterials · Fullerene mechanosynthesis guided by molecular machine systems. MNT would involve combining Carbon nanotubes physical principles demonstrated by chemistry, other nanotechnologies, and the molecular Nanotube membranes machinery Fullerene chemistry Applications · Popular culture Timeline · Carbon allotropes Nanoparticles · Quantum dots Colloidal gold · Colloidal
    [Show full text]
  • Uses of Nanorobotics Technology
    Volume II, Issue IV, APRIL 2013 IJLTEMAS ISSN 2278 - 2540 USES OF NANOROBOTICS TECHNOLOGY Dr. Gaurav Kumar Jain Deepshikha Group of Colleges [email protected] Mr. Sandeep Joshi Deepshikha Group of Colleges Mr. Ravi Ranjan Deepshikha Group of Colleges ABSTRACT Illnesses such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases and cardiovascular diseases Nanorobotics is the technology of creating continue to ravage people around the world. machines or robots at or close to the microscopic scale of a nanometer (10−9 NANOROBOTICS THEORY:- meters). More specifically, nanorobotics refers to the still largely hypothetical Since nanorobots would be microscopic in nanotechnology engineering discipline of size, it would probably be necessary for very designing and building nanorobots, devices large numbers of them to work together to ranging in size from 0.1-10 micrometers and perform microscopic and macroscopic tasks. constructed of nanoscale or molecular These nanorobot swarms, both those which components. As no artificial non-biological are incapable of replication (as in utility fog) nanorobots have yet been created, they and those which are capable of remain a hypothetical concept. The names unconstrained replication in the natural nanobots, nanoids, nanites or nanomites also environment (as in grey goo and its less have been used to describe these common variants), are found in many hypothetical devices. science fiction stories, such as the Borg nanoprobes in Star Trek. The word KEY WORDS "nanobot" (also "nanite", "nanogene", or Nanorobot, approaches and Applications "nanoant") is often used to indicate this fictional context and is an informal or even INTRODUCTION pejorative term to refer to the engineering concept of nanorobots.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nanobank Database Is Available at for Free Use for Research Purposes
    Forthcoming: Annals of Economics and Statistics (Annales d’Economie et Statistique), Issue 115/116, in press 2014 NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES COMMUNITYWIDE DATABASE DESIGNS FOR TRACKING INNOVATION IMPACT: COMETS, STARS AND NANOBANK Lynne G. Zucker Michael R. Darby Jason Fong Working Paper No. 17404 http://www.nber.org/papers/w17404 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 September 2011 Revised March 2014 The construction of Nanobank was supported under major grants from the National Science Foundation (SES- 0304727 and SES-0531146) and the University of California’s Industry-University Cooperative Research Program (PP9902, P00-04, P01-02, and P03-01). Additional support was received from the California NanoSystems Institute, Sun Microsystems, Inc., UCLA’s International Institute, and from the UCLA Anderson School’s Center for International Business Education and Research (CIBER) and the Harold Price Center for Entrepreneurial Studies. The COMETS database (also known as the Science and Technology Agents of Revolution or STARS database) is being constructed for public research use under major grants from the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation (2008- 0028 and 2008-0031) and the Science of Science and Innovation Policy (SciSIP) Program at the National Science Foundation (grants SES-0830983 and SES-1158907) with support from other agencies. Our colleague Jonathan Furner of the UCLA Department of Information Studies played a leading role in developing the methodology for selecting records for Nanobank. We are indebted to our scientific and policy advisors Roy Doumani, James R. Heath, Evelyn Hu, Carlo Montemagno, Roger Noll, and Fraser Stoddart, and to our research team, especially Amarita Natt, Hsing-Hau Chen, Robert Liu, Hongyan Ma, Emre Uyar, and Stephanie Hwang Der.
    [Show full text]
  • Solar Powered B.E.A.M) Bots Make Your Own Solar Powered Robot to Follow the Sun!
    SOLAR POWERED B.E.A.M) BOTS MAKE YOUR OWN SOLAR POWERED ROBOT TO FOLLOW THE SUN! ELECTRICAL, ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING AND ROBOTICS ENGINEERING FOR SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS THIS PROJECT HAS RECEIVED FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION HORIZON 2020 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION PROGRAMME UNDER GRANT AGREEMENT NO. 710577 PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT ACRONYM STEM4YOU(th) PROJECT TITLE Promotion of STEM education by key scientific challenges and their impact on our life and career perspectives GRANT AGREEMENT 710577 START DATE 1 May 2016 THEME SWAFS / H2020 DELIVERABLE DETAILS WORK PACKAGE NO. AND TITLE WP5 – CONTENT CREATION, TOOLS AND LEARNING METHODOLOGY DEVELOPMENT DELIVERABLE NO. and TITLE D5.1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY COURSE- ENGINEERING SUB-COURSE NATURE OF DELIVERABLE AS PER R=Report DOW DISSEMINATION LEVEL AS PER PU=Public DOW VERSION FINAL DATE JULY 2018 AUTHORS EUGENIDES FOUNDATION THIS PROJECT HAS RECEIVED FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN UNION HORIZON 2020 RESEARCH AND INNOVATION PROGRAMME UNDER GRANT AGREEMENT NO. 710577 / 2 INDEX INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 4 Activity 0-What is engineering? ............................................................................................. 5 Activity 1 - Identifying the problem (what is the engineering problem?) .......... 13 Activity 2 – Divide into sub-problems ............................................................................... 15 Activity 3 – Explore the science ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing a Robotics Club in Albania
    Introducing a Robotics Club in Albania by William Hunt Ryan McQuaid Jacob Sussman Elizabeth Tomko Sponsored by Harry Fultz Institute, Tirana, Albania Introducing a Robotics Club in Albania An Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science by William Hunt, RBE Ryan McQuaid, ECE Jacob Sussman, RBE Elizabeth Tomko, RBE Date: 18 December 2014 Report submitted to: Professor Peter Christopher, Advisor This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Abstract This project established a robotics club at the Harry Fultz Institute Technical High School in Tirana, Albania. We worked with a group of 24 enthusiastic students, divided into six teams, each directed by a student mentor. Employing a strategy of self-directed learning, we helped the teams design and build low-cost robots, culminating in an official presentation to the school. We assessed outcomes by documenting participant perceptions of the educational activities. Student participants reported that they valued the experience and that they would continue to engage in robotics activities after we left the country. We recommend that the Harry Fultz Institute continue the robotics club, and that other Albanian schools begin their own robotics programs. iii Acknowledgements We express our sincere gratitude to the staff, faculty and students of the Harry Fultz Institute, especially Professor Enxhi Jaupi, whose direct involvement and support made this project a reality.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Applications and Human Biosafety of Nanomaterials Used in Nanomedicine
    HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author J Appl Toxicol Manuscript Author . Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2019 May 09. Published in final edited form as: J Appl Toxicol. 2018 January ; 38(1): 3–24. doi:10.1002/jat.3476. Potential applications and human biosafety of nanomaterials used in nanomedicine Hong Sua,†, Yafei Wanga,†, Yuanliang Gua,†, Linda Bowmanb, Jinshun Zhaoa,b,*, and Min Dingb,* aDepartment of Preventative Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Pathological and Physiological Technology, School of Medicine, Ningbo University, 818 Fenghua Road, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province 315211, People’s Republic of China bToxicology and Molecular Biology Branch, Health Effects Laboratory Division, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA Abstract With the rapid development of nanotechnology, potential applications of nanomaterials in medicine have been widely researched in recent years. Nanomaterials themselves can be used as image agents or therapeutic drugs, and for drug and gene delivery, biological devices, nanoelectronic biosensors or molecular nanotechnology. As the composition, morphology, chemical properties, implant sites as well as potential applications become more and more complex, human biosafety of nanomaterials for clinical use has become a major concern. If nanoparticles accumulate in the human body or interact with the body molecules or chemical components, health risks may also occur. Accordingly, the unique chemical
    [Show full text]
  • Model Characteristics and Properties of Nanorobots in the Bloodstream Michael Makoto Zimmer
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2005 Model Characteristics and Properties of Nanorobots in the Bloodstream Michael Makoto Zimmer Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY FAMU-FSU COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING MODEL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROPERTIES OF NANOROBOTS IN THE BLOODSTREAM By MICHAEL MAKOTO ZIMMER A Thesis submitted to the Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Degree Awarded: Spring Semester 2005 The members of the Committee approve the Thesis of Michael M. Zimmer defended on April 4, 2005. ___________________________ Yaw A. Owusu Professor Directing Thesis ___________________________ Rodney G. Roberts Outside Committee Member ___________________________ Reginald Parker Committee Member ___________________________ Chun Zhang Committee Member Approved: _______________________ Hsu-Pin (Ben) Wang, Chairperson Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering _______________________ Chin-Jen Chen, Dean FAMU-FSU College of Engineering The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii For the advancement of technology where engineers make the future possible. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I want to give thanks and appreciation to Dr. Yaw A. Owusu who first gave me the chance and motivation to pursue my master’s degree. I also want to give my thanks to my undergraduate team who helped in obtaining information for my thesis and helped in setting up my experiments. Many thanks go to Dr. Hans Chapman for his technical assistance. I want to acknowledge the whole Undergraduate Research Center for Cutting Edge Technology (URCCET) for their support and continuous input in my studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Utility Fog: a Universal Physical Substance
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=19940022864 2018-09-18T22:10:35+00:00Z N94- 27367 UTILITY FOG: A UNIVERSAL PHYSICAL SUBSTANCE J. Storm Hall Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Jersey Abstract tern of robots, which vary their properties according to which part of the object they are representing at Active, polymorphic material ("Utility Fog") can the time. An object can then move across a cloud of be designed as a conglomeration of 100-micron robotic robots without the individual robots moving, just as cells (_foglets'). Such robots could be built with the pixels on a CRT remain stationary while pictures the techniques of molecular nanotechnology[18]. Con- move around on the screen. trollers with processing capabilities of 1000 MIPS per The Utility Fog which is simulating air needs to be cubic micron, and electric motors with power densities impalpable. One would like to be able to walk through of one milliwatt per cubic micron are assumed. Util- a Fog-filled room without the feeling of having been ity Fog should be capable of simulating most everyday cast into a block of solid Lucite. It is also desire- materials, dynamically changing its form and proper- able to be able to breathe while using the Fog in this ties, and forms a substrate for an integrated virtual way! To this end, the robots representing empty space reality said telerobotics. constantly run a fluid-flow simulation of what the air would be doing if the robots weren't there. Then each robot does what the air it displaces would do in its 1 Introduction absence.
    [Show full text]