Should Boeing and Airbus Sell Planes to Iran Air?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Should Boeing and Airbus Sell Planes to Iran Air? Research Memo Should Boeing and Airbus sell planes to Iran Air? Iran Air and Mahan Air still ferrying militants and weapons to support Syria’s Bashar al-Assad At least 404 flights from Iran to Syria since the JCPOA commenced By Emanuele Ottolenghi January 17, 2017 In January 2016, Airbus inked a deal to sell 118 planes to Iran Air, the Islamic Republic’s flag carrier, and in June of that year, Boeing announced it had reached a deal for the sale of 100 aircraft as well. In September, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued initial export licenses for both companies to deliver the jetliners. In November, Airbus received the official export license and just this week delivered its first plane to Iran Air. Treasury designated Iran Air on June 23, 2011 for “providing material support and services to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and Ministry of Defense and Armed Forces Logistics (MODAFL).” MODAFL is itself designated under Executive Order 13382 for its proliferation activities. Treasury also stated that “commercial Iran Air flights have been used to transport missile or rocket components to Syria.”1 “Iran Air has shipped military-related equipment on behalf of the IRGC since 2006,” the Treasury statement said, adding, that it has “shipped aircraft-related raw materials to a MODAFL-associated company, including titanium sheets, which have dual-use military applications and can be used in support of advanced weapons programs.” It also stated that “rockets or missiles have been transported via Iran Air passenger aircraft, and IRGC officers occasionally take control over Iran Air flights carrying special IRGC-related cargo. The IRGC is also known to disguise and manifest such shipments as medicine and generic spare parts, and IRGC officers have discouraged Iran Air pilots from inspecting potentially dangerous IRGC-related cargo being carried aboard a commercial Iran Air aircraft, including to Syria.”2 The Foundation for Defense of Democracies has tracked flights on Iran’s resupply route to the Syrian regime,3 and has written extensively about the risks of selling additional planes to Iran.4 1. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Press Release, “Fact Sheet: Treasury Sanctions Major Iranian Commercial Entities,” June 23, 2011. (https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1217.aspx) 2. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Press Release, “Fact Sheet: Treasury Sanctions Major Iranian Commercial Entities,” June 23, 2011. (https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1217.aspx) 3. @eottolenghi, Twitter, accessed January 13, 2017. (https://twitter.com/eottolenghi/media) 4. Emanuele Ottolenghi, “The Iran-Boeing Deal: Rewards and Risks,”Foundation for Defense of Democracies, June 17, 2016. (http://www. defenddemocracy.org/media-hit/emanuele-ottolenghi-the-iran-boeing-deal-rewards-and-risks/) Should Boeing and Airbus sell planes to Iran Air? 1 As the chart below shows, Iran Air has not ceased its illicit activities. It continues to ply the resupply route to Syria, ferrying weapons and militants to the Assad regime, a designated State Sponsor of Terrorism5 that has killed hundreds of thousands of people in the nearly six years of the Syrian civil war. Since the implementation of the Iran nuclear deal a year ago, Mahan Air has operated at least 185 flights to Syria, and Iran Air has flown 93. Mahan Air is designated by Treasury for “providing financial, material and technological support to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force.”6 Iran Air, however, was removed from the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list on January 16, 2016 as part of the nuclear deal.7 At the time, State Department spokesman John Kirby said: “I’m not at liberty to go into the reasons behind the fact that it was removed from the SDN list.”8 The airline was designated in 2011 under a non- proliferation Executive Order (13382), but as the evidence shows, its de-listing last year was not a consequence of a change in its behavior. It should now be designated for its continued terrorism activities. Over the past year, Cham Wings Airlines, a Syrian-based airline, has been steadily increasing its flights from Tehran to Damascus. In 2015, Treasury designated its chairman Issam Shammout and his other airline Sky Blue Bird Aviation for procuring aircrafts and parts for Mahan Air.9 Cham Wings Airlines has been listed on the Commerce Department’s Entity List since 2011 and was designated by Treasury on December 23, 2016, under Executive Order 13582 for its material, financial, and technological support to the government of Syria and its U.S.-sanctioned Syrian Arab Airlines.10 Iran Air has a fleet of about 36 planes, though it is not clear whether it will decommission these aircraft. The airline could, for example, use its existing planes for illicit activities while the new ones will be used for commercial routes. This raises questions about what Iran Air will do with its current fleet, and – with no clear need for three times the number of its current fleet – with the Boeing and Airbus planes if the deals move forward. Will Iran Air sell, lease, or otherwise provide the excess planes to the other Iranian airlines? Like Mahan Air, the two other Iranian airlines (Yas Air, a.k.a. Pouya Air, and Aban Air) remain designated by the U.S. government for illicit activity. Beyond the new aircraft, there are other troubling issue with these deals. Annex 2 of the JCPOA specifies that “the United States commits to allow for the sale of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran … provided that licensed items and services are used exclusively for commercial passenger aviation.”11 This will provide support not only for the planes in the deal, but also for Iran’s current aircraft as well. If Iran is committed to continuing to use its existing planes for illicit activities, this provision will prolong their shelf life considerably. 5. U.S. Department of State, “State Sponsors of Terrorism,” accessed January 13, 2017. (https://www.state.gov/j/ct/list/c14151.htm) 6. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Press Release, “Treasury Designates Iranian Commercial Airline Linked to Iran’s Support for Terrorism,” October 12, 2011. (https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/tg1322.aspx) 7. U.S. Department of the Treasury, “JCPOA-related Designation Removals, JCPOA Designation Updates, Foreign Sanctions Evaders Removals, NS-ISA List Removals; 13599 List Changes,” January 16, 2016. (https://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/sanctions/OFAC- Enforcement/Pages/updated_names.aspx) 8. Pete Kasperowicz, “State Dept.: Trust us on Iran-Boeing deal,” The Washington Examiner, June 23, 2016. (http://www.washingtonexaminer. com/state-dept.-trust-us-on-iran-boeing-deal/article/2594767) 9. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Press Release, “Treasury Department Targets Those Involved in Iranian Scheme to Purchase Airplanes,” May 21, 2015. (https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl10061.aspx) 10. U.S. Department of the Treasury, Press Release, “Treasury Sanctions Additional Individuals and Entities in Response to Continuing Violence in Syria,” December 23, 2016. (https://www.treasury.gov/press-center/press-releases/Pages/jl0690.aspx) 11. Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, Vienna, July 14, 2015, Annex II – Sanctions-related commitments. (https://www.state.gov/ documents/organization/245320.pdf) 2 FDD’s Center on Sanctions and Illicit Finance The Treasury Department designated Pouya Air in August 2014 for “acting for or on behalf of the IRGC-QF.”12 Specifically, it was found to be “transporting illicit cargo, including weapons, to Iran’s clients in the Levant.” Pouya Air remains designated as of January 2017.13 Using a publically available real-time flight tracking service, the chart below records at least 404 flights from Iran to Syria by Iran Air, Mahan Air, Pouya Air, Cham Wings, and the Iranian Air Force from July 14, 2015 – when the JCPOA commenced – to December 16, 2016. This chart does not include all flights, as Iran Air uses deceptive practices such as turning off its tracking signals and concealing routes. Other flights were simply not tracked. Summary of data • In total, Iran Air, Mahan Air, Pouya Air, Cham Wings Airlines, and the Iranian Air Force operated at least 404 flights from Iran to Syria since the Iran nuclear deal was adopted on July 14, 2015. At least 103 of these were Iran Air flights. • Since January 16, 2016, JCPOA Implementation Day, Mahan Air has flown at least 185 flights from Iran to Syria, and Iran Air operated 93 flights from Iran to Syria. • Since the JCPOA was announced, at least 211 flights were flown from Tehran to Damascus. Of these, 194 have occurred since Implementation Day. • Since the JCPOA was announced, there have been at least two flights from Tehran to the Syrian regime’s coastal stronghold of Latakia, which also hosts a Russian air base. • Since the JCPOA was announced, at least 99 flights were flown from Abadan, Iran, which serves as a logistical hub for the Revolutionary Guard’s airlifts to Syria. Of these, 58 have occurred since Implementation Day. • Since the JCPOA was announced, at least two flights were flown from Yazd, Iran to Damascus or elsewhere in Syria, as well as one from Tabriz and three from Kermanshah. Airline (flight number) Flight registration Departure Destination Date Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNF Tehran Syria 15-Dec-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBC Tehran Damascus 15-Dec-16 Iran Air (IR697) EP-IBL Tehran Damascus 13-Dec-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNO Tehran Syria 13-Dec-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 13-Dec-16 Mahan Air (W5146) EP-MMJ Iran Syria 12-Dec-16 Mahan Air (W5142) EP-MNF Tehran Syria 11-Dec-16 Cham Wings Airlines (6Q562) YK-BAB Tehran Damascus 11-Dec-16 Iran Air (IR697) Tehran Damascus 8-Dec-16 12.
Recommended publications
  • SDN Changes 2014
    OFFICE OF FOREIGN ASSETS CONTROL CHANGES TO THE Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List SINCE JANUARY 1, 2014 This publication of Treasury's Office of Foreign AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah (a.k.a. SAHAB, Qari; IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN Assets Control ("OFAC") is designed as a a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB TUNISIA; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH; a.k.a. reference tool providing actual notice of actions by 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'AH IN TUNISIA; a.k.a. OFAC with respect to Specially Designated Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, "SUPPORTERS OF ISLAMIC LAW"), Tunisia Nationals and other entities whose property is Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) [FTO] [SDGT]. blocked, to assist the public in complying with the [SDGT]. AL-RAYA ESTABLISHMENT FOR MEDIA various sanctions programs administered by SAHAB, Qari (a.k.a. AL TOKHI, Qari Saifullah; PRODUCTION (a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIA; OFAC. The latest changes may appear here prior a.k.a. SAIFULLAH, Qari), Quetta, Pakistan; DOB a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARI'A BRIGADE; a.k.a. to their publication in the Federal Register, and it 1964; alt. DOB 1963 to 1965; POB Daraz ANSAR AL-SHARI'A IN BENGHAZI; a.k.a. is intended that users rely on changes indicated in Jaldak, Qalat District, Zabul Province, ANSAR AL-SHARIA IN LIBYA; a.k.a. ANSAR this document that post-date the most recent Afghanistan; citizen Afghanistan (individual) AL-SHARIAH; a.k.a. ANSAR AL-SHARIAH Federal Register publication with respect to a [SDGT].
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's Misuse of Civilian Aircraft
    Iran’s Misuse of Civilian Aircraft May 2020 1 Overview Iran’s civil aviation industry has historically aided the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) efforts to procure, supply and transport weapons, ballistic missile components and military personnel to its terrorist proxies and allies such as Hezbollah and the Assad regime. According to a July 2019 advisory published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury, “Iran has routinely relied upon Iranian commercial airlines to fly fighters and materiel to international locations in furtherance of Iranian state-sponsored terror operations.” The advisory warns, “U.S. and non-U.S. persons operating in the civil aviation industry face potential civil and criminal consequences for violating OFAC’s [Office of Foreign Assets Control, Department of the Treasury] sanctions programs, including by engaging in unauthorized transfers of U.S.-origin aircraft or related goods, technology, or services to Iran.” As well as the notorious Mahan Air, which was sanctioned for its terrorist activities as far back as 2011 and is now banned from landing in all of mainland Europe, a multitude of Iranian civilian airlines are listed as Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGT), including Caspian Air, Meraj Air, Pouya Air, Dena Airways, Khors Aircompany, Qeshm Fars Air. On November 5, 2018, OFAC also added Iran Air, the main civilian airline of the Islamic Republic of Iran, to the Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) list. All are subject to “secondary sanctions,” which apply to non-U.S. persons outside the U.S. Under the terms of the JCPOA, the United States committed to “allow for the sale of commercial passenger aircraft and related parts and services to Iran by licensing the (i) export, re-export, sale, lease or transfer to Iran of commercial passenger aircraft for exclusively civil aviation end-use.” In December 2016, Boeing entered into a contract with Iran’s national airline, the government- owned Iran Air, for 80 civilian airliners valued at $16.6 billion.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation
    MIDRMA Board/13-WP/6 3/03/2014 International Civil Aviation Organization Middle East Regional Monitoring Agency Board Thirteenth Meeting (MIDRMA Board/13) (Bahrain, 9 –12 March 2014) Agenda Item 4: RVSM Monitoring and Related Technical Issues MID STATES MINIMUM MONITORING REQUIREMENTS (Presented by MIDRMA) SUMMARY The aim of this working paper is to address the RVSM Minimum Monitoring Requirements (MMR) applicable for each MIDRMA Member State. Action by the meeting is at paragraph 3. REFERENCES − ATM/AIM/SAR SG/13 Report − ICAO Doc 9547 − ICAO doc 9937 − ICAO Annex 6 Part I − MIDANPIRG/14 Report − MID RVSM SMR 2012-2013 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The height-keeping performance of aircraft is a key element in ensuring the safe operations of RVSM airspace. The RVSM height monitoring standards are considered the minimum requirement needed to maintain the safety of operations in the RVSM designated airspace. 1.2 Upon changes to ICAO Annex 6, Operation of Aircraft, Parts I & II, applicable on 18 November 2010, the following standard was adopted by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO): 7.2.7 The State of the Operator that has issued an RVSM approval to an operator shall establish a requirement which ensures that a minimum of two aeroplanes of each aircraft type grouping of the operator have their height-keeping performance monitored, at least once every two years or within intervals of 1000 flight hours per aeroplane, whichever period is longer. If an operator aircraft type grouping consists of a single aeroplane, monitoring of that aeroplane shall be accomplished within the specified period.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP July 2019
    Monthly OTP July 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This July result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG pleas [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – July 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size SATA International-Azores GA Garuda Indonesia 93.9% 1 13,798 52 S4 30.8% 160 833 253 Airlines S.A. XL LATAM Airlines Ecuador 92.0% 2 954 246 ZI Aigle Azur 47.8% 159 1,431 215 HD AirDo 90.2% 3 1,806 200 OA Olympic Air 50.6% 158 7,338 92 3K Jetstar Asia 90.0% 4 2,514 168 JU Air Serbia 51.6% 157 3,302 152 CM Copa Airlines 90.0% 5 10,869 66 SP SATA Air Acores 51.8% 156 1,876 196 7G Star Flyer 89.8% 6 1,987 193 A3 Aegean Airlines 52.1% 155 5,446 114 BC Skymark Airlines 88.9% 7 4,917 122 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Vea Un Ejemplo
    3 To search aircraft in the registration index, go to page 178 Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page Operator Page 10 Tanker Air Carrier 8 Air Georgian 20 Amapola Flyg 32 Belavia 45 21 Air 8 Air Ghana 20 Amaszonas 32 Bering Air 45 2Excel Aviation 8 Air Greenland 20 Amaszonas Uruguay 32 Berjaya Air 45 748 Air Services 8 Air Guilin 20 AMC 32 Berkut Air 45 9 Air 8 Air Hamburg 21 Amelia 33 Berry Aviation 45 Abu Dhabi Aviation 8 Air Hong Kong 21 American Airlines 33 Bestfly 45 ABX Air 8 Air Horizont 21 American Jet 35 BH Air - Balkan Holidays 46 ACE Belgium Freighters 8 Air Iceland Connect 21 Ameriflight 35 Bhutan Airlines 46 Acropolis Aviation 8 Air India 21 Amerijet International 35 Bid Air Cargo 46 ACT Airlines 8 Air India Express 21 AMS Airlines 35 Biman Bangladesh 46 ADI Aerodynamics 9 Air India Regional 22 ANA Wings 35 Binter Canarias 46 Aegean Airlines 9 Air Inuit 22 AnadoluJet 36 Blue Air 46 Aer Lingus 9 Air KBZ 22 Anda Air 36 Blue Bird Airways 46 AerCaribe 9 Air Kenya 22 Andes Lineas Aereas 36 Blue Bird Aviation 46 Aereo Calafia 9 Air Kiribati 22 Angkasa Pura Logistics 36 Blue Dart Aviation 46 Aero Caribbean 9 Air Leap 22 Animawings 36 Blue Islands 47 Aero Flite 9 Air Libya 22 Apex Air 36 Blue Panorama Airlines 47 Aero K 9 Air Macau 22 Arab Wings 36 Blue Ridge Aero Services 47 Aero Mongolia 10 Air Madagascar 22 ARAMCO 36 Bluebird Nordic 47 Aero Transporte 10 Air Malta 23 Ariana Afghan Airlines 36 Boliviana de Aviacion 47 AeroContractors 10 Air Mandalay 23 Arik Air 36 BRA Braathens Regional 47 Aeroflot 10 Air Marshall Islands 23
    [Show full text]
  • Iran Is Still Using Pseudo-Civilian Airlines to Resupply Assad by Farzin Nadimi
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2785 Iran Is Still Using Pseudo-Civilian Airlines to Resupply Assad by Farzin Nadimi Apr 13, 2017 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Farzin Nadimi Farzin Nadimi, an associate fellow with The Washington Institute, is a Washington-based analyst specializing in the security and defense affairs of Iran and the Persian Gulf region. Brief Analysis While some international sanctions against Iranian civil aviation have been lifted, Tehran's insistence on using Mahan Air and other companies to send personnel and weapons to Syria may jeopardize the industry's future. s the aviation community and international media fixate on recent Boeing and Airbus orders by Iranian A airlines, Tehran continues to quietly purchase secondhand aircraft and parts through smaller companies, actively circumventing terrorism-related sanctions against certain airlines and individuals. By combining military and civil aviation components, Iran seeks to bolster its regional airlift capability, but any companies associated with such activity -- even indirectly -- are putting themselves in the crosshairs of U.S. sanctions policy. THE 'SYRIAN EXPRESS' AIR BRIDGE T he Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force has long used pseudo-civilian resources to help Iran's allies in Syria. In addition to close support from Mahan Air (see next section), the IRGC has set up its own cover airlines and service companies to provide logistical assistance and boost revenue. The main airline operated by the IRGC and its Pars Aviation Company is Pouya Air. Its predecessors, Pars Air and Yas Air, were designated as terrorist entities in 2012 by the United States, which accused them of transporting weapons to the Syrian regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Overwhelmed by Technology: How Did User Interface Failures on Board the USS Vincennes Lead to 290 Dead?
    Overwhelmed by Technology: How did user interface failures on board the USS Vincennes lead to 290 dead? Luke Swartz Background On July 3, 1988, the 290 passengers and crew of Iran Air Flight 655 were seemingly distant from the bitter and prolonged Iran-Iraq war. Many of the passengers were ultimately bound for Mecca, making their sacred pilgrimage as prescribed in the Koran. However, at 10:24 AM, seven minutes after the Airbus took off from Bandar Abbas Airport for Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, the United States Navy guided missile cruiser Vincennes fired two missiles at the plane, destroying the hapless target and its civilian occupants with horrific precision. What Went Wrong? Immediately after the tragedy, the US quickly blamed Iran for letting the plane fly over the combat situation below; then-Vice President Bush explained to the UN Security Council that the Vincennes “acted in self-defense,” thinking that Flight 655, after failing to respond to seven warnings, was “an Iranian military aircraft…approaching with hostile intentions.” Iran’s foreign minister charged the US with intentionally downing the plane, adding, “This was a premeditated act of aggression against the integrity of Tehran…a massacre.” While few objective observers think that the Vincennes’ action was intentional, and fewer still believe that its shooting down the civilian airliner was correct, numerous experts have debated what went wrong that fateful day. Many theories deal with aspects of the situation and the key players both on the Vincennes and in the cockpit of Flight 655. Failure to Respond? We may never know why Flight 655 failed to respond to the Vincennes’ repeated warnings, as its “black box” flight recorder could not be recovered.
    [Show full text]
  • Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update 398 / 23 March 2021
    No. 398 / 23 March 2021 New Lab Total Lab Confirmed Cases New Deaths Confirmed Cases Total Recoveries Total Deaths IRAN 7,290 74 1,815,712 1,555,766 61,951 Trend of COVID‐19 I.R. IRAN Update Daily Laboratory-Confirmed COVID-19 Cases, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 0 19-Feb-20 4-Apr-20 19-May-20 3-Jul-20 17-Aug-20 1-Oct-20 15-Nov-20 30-Dec-20 13-Feb-21 30-Mar-21 Daily Confirmed COVID-19 Deaths, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 19-Feb-20 4-Apr-20 19-May-20 3-Jul-20 17-Aug-20 1-Oct-20 15-Nov-20 30-Dec-20 13-Feb-21 30-Mar-21 COVID-19 Cumulative Laboratory-Confirmed Cases and Recoveries, 19 February 2020 - 23 March 2021 2,000,000 1,800,000 1,600,000 1,400,000 1,200,000 1,000,000 800,000 600,000 400,000 200,000 0 20-Feb-20 05-Apr-20 20-May-20 04-Jul-20 18-Aug-20 02-Oct-20 16-Nov-20 31-Dec-20 14-Feb-21 31-Mar-21 Cumula�ve Cases Cumula�ve Recoveries Coronaviru��Update Islamic Republic of Iran| Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) | 23 March 2021 2 COVID-19 Patients in Intensive Care, 26 March 2020 - 23 March 2021 6,500 6,000 5,500 5,000 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 0 26-Mar-20 10-May-20 24-Jun-20 08-Aug-20 22-Sep-20 06-Nov-20 21-Dec-20 04-Feb-21 21-Mar-21 Laboratory Tests Update (Na�onal COVID­19 Laboratory Network) Total Number of Daily COVID-19 PCR Tests 69,000 67,000 65,000 63,000 61,000 59,000 57,000 55,000 53,000 51,000 49,000 47,000 45,000 43,000 41,000 39,000 37,000 35,000 33,000 31,000 29,000 27,000 25,000 23,000 21,000 19,000 17,000 15,000 13,000 11,000 9,000 0 12-Apr-20 27-May-20 11-Jul-20 25-Aug-20 09-Oct-20 23-Nov-20 07-Jan-21 21-Feb-21 07-Apr-21 Total cumulative laboratory tests as of today is 12,284,847.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Volatility Steadies the Climb
    WORLD AIRLINER CENSUS Global volatility steadies the climb Cirium Fleet Forecast’s latest outlook sees heady growth settling down to trend levels, with economic slowdown, rising oil prices and production rate challenges as factors Narrowbodies including A321neo will dominate deliveries over 2019-2038 Airbus DAN THISDELL & CHRIS SEYMOUR LONDON commercial jets and turboprops across most spiking above $100/barrel in mid-2014, the sectors has come down from a run of heady Brent Crude benchmark declined rapidly to a nybody who has been watching growth years, slowdown in this context should January 2016 low in the mid-$30s; the subse- the news for the past year cannot be read as a return to longer-term averages. In quent upturn peaked in the $80s a year ago. have missed some recurring head- other words, in commercial aviation, slow- Following a long dip during the second half Alines. In no particular order: US- down is still a long way from downturn. of 2018, oil has this year recovered to the China trade war, potential US-Iran hot war, And, Cirium observes, “a slowdown in high-$60s prevailing in July. US-Mexico trade tension, US-Europe trade growth rates should not be a surprise”. Eco- tension, interest rates rising, Chinese growth nomic indicators are showing “consistent de- RECESSION WORRIES stumbling, Europe facing populist backlash, cline” in all major regions, and the World What comes next is anybody’s guess, but it is longest economic recovery in history, US- Trade Organization’s global trade outlook is at worth noting that the sharp drop in prices that Canada commerce friction, bond and equity its weakest since 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly OTP November 2019
    Monthly OTP November 2019 ON-TIME PERFORMANCE AIRLINES Contents On-Time is percentage of flights that depart or arrive within 15 minutes of schedule. Global OTP rankings are only assigned to all Airlines/Airports where OAG has status coverage for at least 80% of the scheduled flights. Regional Airlines Status coverage will only be based on actual gate times rather than estimated times. This may result in some airlines / airports being excluded from this report. If you would like to review your flight status feed with OAG, please email [email protected] MAKE SMARTER MOVES Airline Monthly OTP – November 2019 Page 1 of 1 Home GLOBAL AIRLINES – TOP 50 AND BOTTOM 50 TOP AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance BOTTOM AIRLINE ON-TIME FLIGHTS On-time performance Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size Airline Arrivals Rank No. flights Size JH Fuji Dream Airlines 96.5% 1 2,340 155 3H Air Inuit 37.2% 162 1,465 196 GA Garuda Indonesia 95.8% 2 12,736 48 AI Air India 40.1% 161 16,509 38 RC Atlantic Airways Faroe Islands 95.0% 3 210 295 WG Sunwing Airlines Inc. 50.3% 160 905 225 7G Star Flyer 94.0% 4 2,160 164 WO Swoop 53.4% 159 919 222 EW Eurowings 93.4% 5 15,608 40 SG SpiceJet 54.3% 158 18,288 33 SATA International-Azores 6J Solaseed 93.3% 6 2,226 161 S4 54.5% 157 448 260 Airlines S.A. XQ SunExpress 93.3% 7 3,115 135 IW Wings Air 54.7% 156 11,242 55 TA TACA International Airlines 92.8% 8 374 272 JY Intercaribbean Airways Ltd 56.1% 155 1,760 184 FA Safair 92.6% 9 2,250 159 JT Lion Air 58.0% 154 17,320 34 B7 Uni Airways 92.5% 10 4,132 123 BJ Nouvelair
    [Show full text]
  • Broad Shoulders at Iran Air Flag-Carrier Raises the Standard in the Face of Adversity Page 18
    ISSUE 3, VOLUME 5: AUGUST – OCTOBER 2013 THE MAGAZINE FOR AEROSPACE PROFESSIONALS IN THE MIDDLE EAST, NORTH AFRICA AND TURKEY www.arabianaerospace.aero BROAD SHOULDERS AT IRAN AIR FLAG-CARRIER RAISES THE STANDARD IN THE FACE OF ADVERSITY PAGE 18 SPECIAL REPORT FOCUS ON SAUDI ARABIA AIRPORTS Supreme 56-page Dubai challenge special faces up to in on the resurfacing Afghanistan kingdom problems PAGE 61 PAGE 71 PAGE 144 V2_OFC_ARA AS i3_SP [email protected] 1 31/07/13 6:47 PM comment ISSUE 3 VOL 5 | AUGUST 2013 – OCTOBER 2013 Published by Leading the world… but still storms abound TIMES Aerospace Limited Regional Office 3-4 Rumsey House PO box: 371391 Locks Hill, Rochford Dubai Airport Free Zone Essex, SS4 1BB Building 6EA, Suite 222, UK Dubai Tel: +44 (0)1702 53 0000 United Arab Emirates Fax: +44 (0)1702 53 3088 Tel: +971 4 603 3364 Website: www.arabianaerospace.aero Directors: Mark Brown & Kevin Sammon Publisher: Mark Brown [email protected] Display Advertising: Nick Hutchins [email protected] Dave Winship-Evans [email protected] Production Coordinator: Afghanistan offers great opportunities for our region as Arabian Aerospace discovered on our tour. Claire Silva [email protected] he Middle East airlines were the main talking the EU blacklist, a move that IATA’s director general Circulation Dept: point at the IATA AGM in Cape Town in June. Tony Tyler described as “absurd”. Ryan Everitt [email protected] TOn stage, as members of various key panels, the Arabian Aerospace joined the airline to visit both leaders of the region’s main airlines were relaxed and bases in Kabul and Dubai.
    [Show full text]
  • Cham Wings Airlines Honors Top Athletes from the Syrian Arab Army Team
    EDITORIAL أﻋﺰاﺋﻲ اﻟﻤﺴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻦ،، ً ﻣﻊ ﺗﺠﺪد اﻟﻠﻘﺎء ﺑﻜﻢ ﺗﺤﻠﻮ اﻷوﻗﺎت وﺗﺰداد ﺳﻌﺎدﺗﻨﺎ ﺑﺼﺤﺒﺘﻜﻢ دوﻣﺎ وأﻧﺘﻢ ﺗﺴﺎﻓﺮون ﻋﻠﻰ أﺟﻨﺤﺔ ﻣﺤﺒﺘﻨﺎ ﻗﺎﺻﺪﻳﻦ وﺟﻬﺎﺗﻜﻢ، ﺣﺎﻣﻠﻴﻦ ﻣﻌﻜﻢ ﻣﻦ ﻋﻄﺮاﻟﺬﻛﺮﻳﺎت اﻟﻄﻴﺒﺔ ﻣﺎ ﺗﺤﻤﻠﻮن وﻟﻌﻞ ﻋﺒﻘﻬﺎ ﺳﻴﺪوم وﻳﺒﻘﻰ ﻟﺤﻴﻦ ﻟﻘﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺑﻜﻢ ﻣﺮات ﻋﺪﻳﺪة ﺑﺈذن اﻟﻠﻪ.. ً ً ﻟﻘﺪ ﻛﺎن ﻟﺼﻴﻒ ﻫﺬا اﻟﻌﺎم ﻧﻜﻬﺔ ﻣﻤﻴﺰة ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻠﻜﻠﻤﺔ ﻣﻦ ﻣﻌﻨﻰ، ﺣﻴﺚ ﺣﻤﻞ ﻣﻌﻪ ﺑﺸﺎﺋﺮ ﺧﻴﺮ ﻛﺜﻴﺮ، واﻋﺪا ﺑﺎﻟﻤﺰﻳﺪ ً وﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﻣﻊ ﺑﺪء ﺗﻌﺎﻓﻲ ﺳﻮرﻳﺘﻨﺎ اﻟﺤﺒﻴﺒﻪ وﻋﻮدة اﻷﻣﺎن واﻻﺳﺘﻘﺮاراﻟﻰ رﺑﻮع وﻃﻦ ﻧﻔﺨﺮ ﺑﺈﻧﺘﻤﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﻟﻪ ﺟﻤﻴﻌﺎ. ً ً ً وﻗﺪ ﻛﺎن ﻷﺟﻨﺤﺔ اﻟﺸﺎم ﻟﻠﻄﻴﺮان، ﺧﻼل ﻫﺬا اﻟﺼﻴﻒ، ﻧﺼﻴﺒﺎ ﻛﺒﻴﺮا ﻣﻦ اﻟﺘﻤﻴﺰ أﻳﻀﺎ ﺷﻤﻞ اﻟﻌﺪﻳﺪ ﻣﻦ اﻟﺨﺪﻣﺎت واﻟﻮﺟﻬﺎت ً اﻟﺘﻲ أﺿﺎﻓﺘﻬﺎ اﻟﺸﺮﻛﺔ ﻣﺆﺧﺮا ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎرﻃﺔ ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺗﻬﺎ وﻫﻲ ﻣﻮﺳﻜﻮ، اﻟﺸﺎرﻗﺔ، ﻋﻤﺎن (اﻷردن) ﺑﺎﻻﺿﺎﻓﺔ اﻟﻰ ﻣﺤﻄﺎﺗﻬﺎ اﻟﻤﺒﺎﺷﺮة واﻟﻤﺬﻛﻮرة ﻋﻠﻰ ﺧﺎرﻃﺔ رﺣﻼﺗﻬﺎ ﻓﻲ ﻫﺬه اﻟﻤﺠﻠﺔ. ً ً وﻳﻜﺎد ﻻﻳﺨﻔﻰ ﻋﻠﻰ أﺣﺪ ﻣﻄﻠﻘﺎ ﻣﺎ ﻟﻬﺬه اﻟﻤﺤﻄﺎت اﻟﺠﺪﻳﺪة ﻣﻦ أﻫﻤﻴﺔ وﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﻟﻠﺴﻮرﻳﻴﻦ اﻟﻤﻘﻴﻤﻴﻦ ﻓﻴﻬﺎ، ً ﻓﺒﺎﻻﺿﺎﻓﺔ ﻟﻜﻮﻧﻬﺎ رﺣﻼت ﻣﺒﺎﺷﺮة ﻣﻦ واﻟﻰ دﻣﺸﻖ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺗﺨﻔﻴﻒ ﺗﻜﺎﻟﻴﻒ اﻟﺴﻔﺮ وأﻋﺒﺎﺋﻪ، ﻓﺈﻧﻬﺎ أﻳﻀﺎ ﺗﻤﺜﻞ ً ﻗﻨﻮات ﺣﻴﻮﻳﺔ ﺗﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﻓﻲ دﻋﻢ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ اﻟﺸﺤﻦ واﻟﻨﻘﻞ اﻟﺠﻮي واﻟﺘﺠﺎري ﻓﻲ ان ﻣﻌﺎ وﻛﻤﺎ ﻫﻮ ﺣﺎل ﺟﻤﻴﻊ اﻟﻮﺟﻬﺎﺗﻨﺎ اﻷﺧﺮى. ً ً ﻫﺬا وﻗﺪ زادت اﻟﺸﺮﻛﺔ ﻋﺪد رﺣﻼﺗﻬﺎ ﻣﻦ ﺑﻌﺾ اﻟﻤﺤﻄﺎت وﺧﺼﻮﺻﺎ ﺧﻼل ﻓﺘﺮة اﻷﻋﻴﺎد واﻻﺟﺎزات اﻟﺼﻴﻔﻴﺔ ﺣﺮﺻﺎ ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺴﻬﻴﻞ ﺣﺮﻛﺔ ﺳﻔﺮﻋﻤﻼﺋﻬﺎ وﻣﺴﺎﻓﺮﻳﻬﺎ اﻟﺬﻳﻦ ﻗﺮروا ﻗﻀﺎء اﺟﺎزاﺗﻬﻢ وﻋﻄﻼﺗﻬﻢ ﻓﻲ ﺑﻠﺪﻫﻢ ﺳﻮرﻳﺎ وﻻﺳﻴﻤﺎ ﺑﻌﺪ اﺗﺴﺎع رﻗﻌﺔ اﻷﻣﺎن واﻟﺴﻼم ﻋﻠﻰ اﻣﺘﺪاد اﻟﻮﻃﻦ. وﻧﺤﻦ ﻓﻲ أﺟﻨﺤﺔ اﻟﺸﺎم ﻟﻠﻄﻴﺮان ﺳﻨﻈﻞ ﻣﻠﺘﺰﻣﻴﻦ ﺑﺮﺳﺎﻟﺘﻨﺎ ﺳﺎﻋﻴﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﺪوام ﻟﺘﻘﺪﻳﻢ ﻛﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﻠﻴﻖ ﺑﻤﺴﺎﻓﺮﻟﻄﺎﻟﻤﺎ ﻧﻌﺘﺰوﻧﺮﺗﻘﻲ ﺑﺨﺪﻣﺘﻪ، ﺣﻴﺚ ﻛﻨﺎ وﻣﺎ زﻟﻨﺎ ﻧﻌﻤﻞ ﺟﺎﻫﺪﻳﻦ ﻋﻠﻰ اﻟﻮﻓﺎء ﺑﺠﻤﻴﻊ اﻟﺘﺰاﻣﺎﺗﻨﺎ ﺗﺠﺎه ﻣﻦ ﺗﻮاﺟﺪﻧﺎ ﻟﺨﺪﻣﺘﻬﻢ وﻧﺤﺜﻬﻢ ً ﻋﻠﻰ ﺗﺰوﻳﺪﻧﺎ ﺑﺄراﺋﻬﻢ وﻣﻘﺘﺮﺣﺎﺗﻬﻢ و ﺑﻜﻞ ﻣﺎ ﻳﺴﺎﻫﻢ ﺑﺘﻄﻮرﻧﺎ وارﺗﻘﺎﺋﻨﺎ ﺣﺘﻰ ﻧﺒﻘﻰ دوﻣﺎ ﻋﻨﺪ ﺣﺴﻦ اﻟﻈﻦ ﺑﻨﺎ.
    [Show full text]