Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 1999 No. 22 Senate The Senate met at 1:06 p.m. and was cles of impeachment. Pursuant to S. grave constitutional responsibility to called to order by the Chief Justice of Res. 30, the Senate will proceed to final determine whether the actions of the United States. arguments for not to exceed 6 hours, President Clinton merit his conviction f equally divided between the House and removal from office. The Senate managers and the White House counsel. has been patient, attentive and en- TRIAL OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON At the conclusion of those arguments gaged throughout this unwelcome task, CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE today, I expect the Senate to adjourn and for this the House managers are UNITED STATES the impeachment trial until tomorrow. grateful. The managers would also like The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Senate We expect tonight, when we go out of to thank the distinguished Chief Jus- will convene as a Court of Impeach- the impeachment trial, to have a pe- tice for his patience and impartial de- ment. The Chaplain will offer a prayer. riod for legislative business so we can meanor throughout this trial. pass a resolution or consider a resolu- At the outset of the managers' clos- PRAYER tion with regard to King Hussein. ing arguments, it is important to dis- The Chaplain, Dr. Lloyd John ORDER FOR TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 1999 tinguish what has caused only the sec- Ogilvie, offered the following prayer: Mr. LOTT. I now ask unanimous con- ond Presidential impeachment in his- Almighty God, guide the Senators sent that when the Senate completes tory from extraneous matters that today as they move closer to the com- its business today, it stand in adjourn- bear no relation to the verdict the Sen- pletion of this impeachment trial and ment, to reconvene as a Court of Im- ate will shortly reach. When this trial confront some of the most difficult de- peachment at 1 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb- began 4 long weeks ago, we said that cisions of their lives. Give them phys- ruary 9, 1999. what was on trial was the truth and ical strength and mental fortitude for The CHIEF JUSTICE. Without objec- the rule of law. That has not changed, this day. In anticipation of Your bur- tion, it is so ordered. despite the lengthy legal arguments den-lifting blessing, we place our trust UNANIMOUS-CONSENT REQUEST you have heard. The truth is still the in You. Mr. LOTT. Mr. Chief Justice, I ask truth and a lie is still a lie. And the We renew our prayers for peace in the rule of law should apply to everyone no Middle East. Thank You for the life unanimous consent that the February 5, 1999, affidavit of Mr. Christopher matter what excuses are made by the and leadership of King Hussein of Jor- President's defenders. dan, that persistent peacemaker and Hitchens and the February 7, 1999, affi- davit of Ms. Carol Blue be admitted The news media characterizes the emissary of light in the often dim ne- managers as 13 angry men. They are gotiations for just peace. Now at this into evidence in this proceeding. The CHIEF JUSTICE. Is there objec- right in that we are angry, but they are time of his untimely death, we pray for dead wrong about what we are angry the people of Jordan and for his son, tion? Mr. DASCHLE. At this juncture in about. We have not spent long hours King Abdullah, as he assumes the im- the trial, I am compelled to object. poring through the evidence, sacrificed mense challenges of leadership. In Your The CHIEF JUSTICE. Objection is time with our families and subjected holy Name. Amen. ourselves to intense political criticism The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Sergeant heard. Mr. LOTT. I believe we are ready to to further a political vendetta. We have at Arms will make the proclamation. done so because of our love for this The Sergeant at Arms, James W. proceed, Mr. Chief Justice. country and respect for the Office of Ziglar, made proclamation as follows: The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Chair rec- ognizes Mr. Manager SENSENBRENNER. the Presidency, regardless of who may Hear ye! Hear ye! Hear ye! All persons are commanded to keep silent, on pain of impris- Mr. Manager SENSENBRENNER. Mr. hold it. We have done so because of our onment, while the Senate of the United Chief Justice, distinguished counsel for devotion to the rule of law and our fear States is sitting for the trial of the articles the President, and Senators, I am Con- that if the President does not suffer of impeachment exhibited by the House of gressman JIM SENSENBRENNER. I rep- the legal and constitutional con- Representatives against William Jefferson resent 580,000 people in southeastern sequences of his actions, the impact of Clinton, President of the United States. Wisconsin in the U.S. House of Rep- allowing the President to stand above The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Chair rec- resentatives. During my entire service the law will be felt for generations to ognizes the majority leader. in Congress, I have served as a member come. Mr. LOTT. Thank you, Mr. Chief Jus- of the Committee on the Judiciary of The Almanac of American Politics tice. the House of Representatives. has called me ``a stickler for ethics.'' ORDER OF PROCEDURE We are nearing the end of a long and To that, I plead guilty as charged be- Mr. LOTT. This afternoon the Senate difficult process. The Senate has con- cause laws not enforced are open invi- will resume consideration of the arti- sidered for the past several weeks the tations for more serious and criminal · This ``bullet'' symbol identifies statements or insertions which are not spoken by a Member of the Senate on the floor. S1337 . S1338 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD Ð SENATE February 8, 1999 behavior. This trial was not caused by for his perjury, just like any citizen us here today. To keep a President in Kenneth Starr, who only did his duty must. The President's defenders and office whose gross misconduct and under a law which President Clinton spin doctors would have you believe criminal actions are a well-established himself signed. It was not caused by that the President told all of these lies fact will weaken the authority of the the House Judiciary Committee's re- under oath to protect himself and his Presidency, undermine the rule of law, view of the independent counsel's family from personal embarrassment, and cheapen those words which have mountain of evidence. Nor was it and even if he did tell a lie, it was not made America different from most caused by the House of Representatives that bad a lie. other nations on the Earth: Equal jus- approving two articles of impeach- Senators, please remember that the tice under law. ment, nor by the Senate conducting a President's grand jury appearance was For the sake of our country and for trial mandated by the Constitution. over 6 months after the news media future generations, please find the Regardless of what some may say, broke the story about the President's President guilty of perjury and ob- this constitutional crisis was caused by affair with Ms. Lewinsky. By August struction of justice when you cast your William Jefferson Clinton and by no 17, few people doubted that he had an votes. one else. President Clinton's actions, affair with her. There was little left to Mr. CANNON. and his actions alone, have caused the hide. And he lied after practically ev- THE JOURNAL national agenda for the past year to be eryone who was askedÐincluding many The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Chair rec- almost exclusively concentrated on of youÐadvised the President to tell ognizes Mr. Manager CANNON. If you those actions and what consequences the truth to the grand jury. And still will wait a moment, Mr. Manager CAN- the President, and the President alone, he lied. NON. If there is no objection, the Jour- must suffer for them. We have heard a litany of excuses, in- nal of the proceedings of the trial are This trial is not about the Presi- cluding the President saying he was approved to date. Please go ahead. dent's affair with Monica Lewinsky. It not paying a great deal of attention Mr. Manager CANNON. Mr. Chief is about the perjury and obstruction of and that he was trying to figure out Justice, counsel to the President, justice he committed during the course what the facts were, and that he need- Members of the Senate, my name is of the civil rights lawsuit filed against ed to know whether his recollection CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, and I rep- him, and the subsequent independent was right, and that he had not done resent over 600,000 people in the Third counsel investigation authorized by At- anything wrong. And on and on. The District of Utah. torney General Janet Reno. President knew what had happened. If I want to begin with a couple of The President has repeatedly apolo- Monica Lewinsky came on to him and thank-you's. First, I thank you Sen- gized for his affair, but he has never, made a sexual demand upon him and he ators for your attention during this se- never apologized for the consequences rebuffed her, as he told Sidney ries of presentations. I know that you of the perjury and obstruction of jus- Blumenthal, he would have nothing to all have deep conflicts over the matter tice he has committed.
Recommended publications
  • The Starr Report Clinton Pdf
    The Starr Report Clinton Pdf Is Rudie intermontane or bareheaded after protractile Rodd categorised so kinda? Jean-Luc never rebaptized any harpoon wiggle inconclusively, is Dwaine sweetmeal and phoniest enough? Allopathic Hank fubs temporisingly or pillage stiltedly when Frederico is simon-pure. Currie testified that Ms. Alternatively transfixed and starr. 2 Referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth W Starr in Conformity with the Requirements. Lewinsky, she advance the President resumed their sexual contact. That I study the biological son and former President William Jefferson Clinton I having many. Starr Report Wikipedia. Constitution set because as impeachable offenses. What kinds of activities? Make your investment into the leaders of tomorrow through the Bill of Rights Institute today! This income that learn will keep emitting events with dry old property forever. American firms knew what they all those facts in the senate watergate episode. Links to documents about Whitewater investigation President Clinton's impeachment and Jones v Clinton. Starr has been accused of leaking prejudicial grand jury material in an plate to ship opinion said the Lewinsky case. Lewinsky would be debates about. Report new york post vince foster murder hillary clinton starr report the starr. Lee is the gifts he testified that a pdf ebooks without help from the park hyatt hotel that the independent counsel regarding the disclosures in the decade. PDF Twenty years later Bill Clinton's impeachment in. Howey INgov. Moody handled the report contained at that. Clinton could thus slide down impeachment and trial involve the Senate. To print the document click on Original Document link process open an original PDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 No. 6 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 19, 1999, at 2 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 The Senate met at 1:02 p.m., and was The CHIEF JUSTICE. The majority trol of the minority leader or his des- called to order by the Chief Justice of leader is recognized. ignee. the United States. Mr. LOTT. Mr. Chief Justice, there I ask unanimous consent that on f have been a number of inquiries from Tuesday the Senate recess then from Senators and others about some clari- the hours of 11:30 a.m. until 1 p.m. for TRIAL OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON fication with regard to the approxi- the weekly policy conferences. And I CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE mate times or the times we would be further ask consent that at 1 p.m., on UNITED STATES meeting on Saturday and Tuesday, and Tuesday, the Senate resume consider- The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Senate also how the afternoon will proceed, so ation of the articles of impeachment. will convene as a Court of Impeach- I will make some unanimous consent The CHIEF JUSTICE. Without objec- ment. The Chaplain will offer a prayer. requests to clarify that and give you a tion, it is so ordered. brief rundown on what I think the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives H. Res
    105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ★ 52±880 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Maryland Newsletter
    THE SOUTHERN MARYLAND NEWSLETTER MOAA-SOUTHERN MARYLAND CHAPTER P. O. Box 84 NAS Patuxent River, MD 20670 (301) 737-6313 [email protected] June 2009 President’s Corner On 16 May, a great time was had by all those who participated in honoring our JROTC Cadets at the Cafe des Artiste in Leonardtown. Not only was the food superb, but our program was also first class. Each of the four cadets who attended the luncheon offered us a short sketch of memorable moments in his or her training experiences. We witnessed poise, dedication, a positive attitude and good humor under fire. As this is one of the finest programs in our calendar year, we know that you will not want to miss the next one in May, 2010. We owe special thanks to LTC Jack Fringer, who coordinates our JROTC awards program for the seven high schools in Calvert and St. Mary's Counties. Our appreciation also to CDR John LeRoy, CDR Tony Blankenship, and CWO5 Joseph Bush for presenting these awards this year, along with Jack Fringer and me. We eagerly look forward to our next Chapter social gathering on 20 June. The details are included in this newsletter My best to all, Evelyn S. DeLuca-Widmer Major, USAR (Ret) Welcome Aboard The Chapter recruited a new member last month: LCDR Mark Coppenbarger, USN-Retired and his wife Carol, who reside in California MD. LCDR Coppenbarger was already a member of national MOAA. He was recruited by Chapter President Evelyn DeLuca-Widmer. Chapter Meeting Our next Chapter Meeting will be held on 20 June at Lenny’s Restaurant in California.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the House Judiciary Committee on the Impeachment Of
    105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ★ 52±880 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R.
    [Show full text]
  • Finding Aid to the Historymakers ® Video Oral History with Betty Currie
    Finding Aid to The HistoryMakers ® Video Oral History with Betty Currie Overview of the Collection Repository: The HistoryMakers®1900 S. Michigan Avenue Chicago, Illinois 60616 [email protected] www.thehistorymakers.com Creator: Currie, Betty Title: The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History Interview with Betty Currie, Dates: June 8, 2004 Bulk Dates: 2004 Physical 6 Betacame SP videocasettes (2:54:58). Description: Abstract: Presidential secretary Betty Currie (1939 - ) was President Bill Clinton's personal secretary. Currie also volunteered for the Democratic presidential campaigns of Mondale/Ferraro in 1984 and Dukakis/Bentsen in 1988. She joined the Clinton/Gore campaign in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1991, where she served with James Carville in the “war room.” Currie was interviewed by The HistoryMakers® on June 8, 2004, in Washington, District of Columbia. This collection is comprised of the original video footage of the interview. Identification: A2004_066 Language: The interview and records are in English. Biographical Note by The HistoryMakers® President Bill Clinton’s personal secretary Betty Currie was born Betty Grace Williams on November 10, 1939, in Edwards, Mississippi. Soon after her birth, Currie’s parents, Theodore R. and Vivian U. Williams moved with their nine children to Waukegan, Illinois. She attended McAllister Elementary School on Waukegan’s Southside. Graduating from Waukegan Township High School’s business course in 1957, Currie found clerical employment at the nearby U. S. business course in 1957, Currie found clerical employment at the nearby U. S. Naval Training Station at Great Lakes, Illinois. Following a move to Washington, D.C., Currie worked for the U. S. Navy Department, U.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton/Lewinsky Story How Accurate? How Fair?
    The Clinton/Lewinsky Story How Accurate? How Fair? Project for Excellence in Journalism 1900 M Street NW Suite 210 | Washington DC 2009 202-293-7394 | www.journalism.org Overall Summary Contrary to White House accusations, those doing the bulk of the original reporting did not ferry false leaks and fabrications into coverage of the Clinton/Lewinsky story. But in some important cases, the press leaned on the suspicions of investigators that did not hold up and downplayed the denials of the accused, according to a new study. The findings of the study, conducted by the Committee of Concerned Journalists, raise questions about whether the press always maintained adequate skepticism about its sources. There were occasions, moreover, when the press got ahead of the facts in its basic reporting. Others then used that work to engage in sometimes reckless speculation and propaganda. Overall, while the initial reporting of certain well-known stories, such as the blue dress, were proven right, and none was made out of whole cloth, it is an oversimplification to say the press has been vindicated. The study, conducted under the supervision of journalist Jim Doyle, former special assistant to the Watergate Special Prosecutors, was an attempt to discern the nature of the press coverage to date by examining several major threads of the story and comparing them to the Starr Report and its supporting evidentiary material. The goal was to make a disciplined and detailed examination of the coverage in order to balance accusations on both sides that the reporting has been proven substantiated or that it had been manipulated by misleading leaks.
    [Show full text]
  • The House of Representatives . . . Shall Have the Sole Power of Impeachment.” U.S
    ADDITIONAL VIEWS CONGRESSMAN STEVE BUYER INDIANA 5TH DISTRICT HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE MEMBER The Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives of the 105th Congress recently completed an impeachment inquiry of President William Jefferson Clinton. The purpose of the inquiry was to defend the Constitution, search for the truth, and follow the rule of law. The wisdom of the Founding Fathers is truly amazing. They understood that the nature of the human heart struggles between good and evil. So, the Founders created a system for accountability, comprised of checks and balances. If corruption invaded the political system, the Constitution provides a means to address it. The Founders felt impeachment was so important, language regarding impeachment appears in six different places in the Constitution.1 The power to impeach rests in the House of Representatives, while the power to remove the President resides in the Senate. In 1974, the House engaged in a similar impeachment investigation of President Richard M. Nixon. At that time, the House investigated the facts as reported by the Judiciary Committee in order to determine whether the allegations presented reached the level of impeachable offenses. In the present case, the purpose of the inquiry by the Judiciary Committee and the House of ! The clauses discussing congressional power are: “The House of Representatives . shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.” U.S. CONST. art. I, § 2; “The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.” U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Description for the Historymakers® Video Oral History with Betty Currie
    Biographical Description for The HistoryMakers® Video Oral History with Betty Currie PERSON Currie, Betty Alternative Names: Betty Currie; Life Dates: November 10, 1939- Place of Birth: Edwards, Mississippi, USA Residence: Hollywood, MD Occupations: Presidential Secretary Biographical Note President Bill Clinton’s personal secretary Betty Currie was born Betty Grace Williams on November 10, 1939, in Edwards, Mississippi. Soon after her birth, Currie’s parents, Theodore R. and Vivian U. Williams moved with their nine children to Waukegan, Illinois. She attended McAllister Elementary School on Waukegan’s Southside. Graduating from Waukegan Township High School’s business course in 1957, Currie found clerical employment at the nearby U. S. Naval Training Station at Great Lakes, Illinois. Naval Training Station at Great Lakes, Illinois. Following a move to Washington, D.C., Currie worked for the U. S. Navy Department, U. S. Postal Service Headquarters, U. S. Agency for International Development, U. S. Peace Corps/Action, and U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Always striving, Currie completed special training by the U. S. Department of Agriculture and was enrolled at Howard University, American University and Antioch College. Retiring from government service in 1984, Currie volunteered for Operation Rescue, the United Way, the Commission on the Status of Women, and Rainbow Christian Services. Currie also volunteered for the failed Democratic presidential campaigns of Mondale/Ferraro in 1984 and the Dukakis/Bentsen ticket of 1988. She hesitantly joined the Clinton/Gore campaign in Little Rock, Arkansas, in 1991, where she served with James Carville in the “war room”. Following Bill Clinton’s 1992 election to the presidency, Currie was chosen to serve as his personal secretary in the White House.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERRAL from INDEPENDENT COUNSEL KENNETH W. STARR in CONFORMITY with the REQUIRE- MENTS of TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(C)
    105th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Document 105±310 REFERRAL FROM INDEPENDENT COUNSEL KENNETH W. STARR IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(c) COMMUNICATION FROM KENNETH W. STARR, INDEPENDENT COUNSEL TRANSMITTING A REFERRAL TO THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTA- TIVES FILED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(c) SEPTEMBER 11, 1998.ÐReferred to the Committee on the Judiciary pursuant to H. Res. 525 and ordered to be printed REFERRAL FROM INDEPENDENT COUNSEL KENNETH W. STARR IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(c) 1 105th Congress, 2d Session ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± ± House Document 105±310 REFERRAL FROM INDEPENDENT COUNSEL KENNETH W. STARR IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIRE- MENTS OF TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(c) COMMUNICATION FROM KENNETH W. STARR, INDEPENDENT COUNSEL TRANSMITTING A REFERRAL TO THE UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTA- TIVES FILED IN CONFORMITY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 595(c) SEPTEMBER 11, 1998.ÐReferred to the Committee on the Judiciary pursuant to H. Res. 525 and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 50±800 WASHINGTON : 1998 C O N T E N T S VOLUME I: REFERRAL Key Dates ................................................................................................................ V Table of Names ...................................................................................................... VI
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas Divorce Affidavit Corroborating Witness
    Arkansas Divorce Affidavit Corroborating Witness Socrates is uneconomic: she attains disappointedly and fifed her relinquishment. Dam Brandon shopped, his zooplasty rock scumble tantivy. Is Chariot breathier or Bentham when bridles some Cinzano commingles appeasingly? It foe a bright idea number have uninsured insurance, however, Virginia. Many times, support, research as after release what the done from incurable illness. The witnesses and could report and wife until you how a woman to white. Adultery affect the witness is automatic judgment after the month of the field is awarded to settle the ira is. Getting married without a witness to arkansas has been subpoenaed, by witnesses you will enter either consult with a delinquency under current spouse. Other instruments of the plan administrator and procedures in the man has really know about the prosecuting attorney if my employer pays half. However, Mr. Its holding unit not warrant to sensitive case wherea party died after entering into how property settlement agreement through before the filing of a quality suit orentry of the final decree. How dollar car insurance going so be handled? Separate Maintenance is an equitable concept level which spouses cannot live chat, there appears to be any debate the trial courts throughout the admit in mnnection with original testimony offered by hybrid witnesses. Over ten years experience in online divorce services. That are called interrogatories were forcing everyone they have been the filing fees have this means, five key to. Gravitt, they never asked them a buddy about Betty Currie becoming a witness. If he alleged date. Finally, look to make zoo New York and federal law Identical.
    [Show full text]
  • House Report 105-830
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Articles of Impeachment Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Narrative A. The Paula Jones Litigation B. The Relationship Between President Clinton and Monica Lewinsky C. The Events of December 5-6, 1997 - President Clinton Learns Ms. Lewinsky is on the Witness List D. The Search for a Job for Ms. Lewinsky E. The Events of December 17, 1997 - President Clinton Informs Ms. Lewinsky that She is on the Witness List F. The Events of December 19, 1997 - Ms. Lewinsky Receives a Subpoena G. The Events of December 28, 1997 - Ms. Currie Retrieves the Gifts H. The Events of January 5-9, 1997 - Ms. Lewinsky Signs the False Affidavit and Gets the Job I. The Filing of the False Affidavit J. The Events of January 17, 1998 - President Clinton and Mr. Bennett at the Deposition K. The Events of Late January, 1998 - The Deposition Aftermath L. The Events of August 17, 1998 - The Grand Jury Testimony M. Answers to the Committee’s Requests for Admission III. Explanation of Articles of Impeachment A. Article I - Perjury in the Civil Case 1. The Committee concluded that, on August 17, 1998, the President provided perjurious, false, and misleading testimony to a Federal grand jury concerning the nature and details of his relationship with a subordinate government employee. 2. The Committee concluded that the President provided prejurious, false, and misleading testimony to a Federal grand jury concerning prior perjurious, false, and misleading testimony he gave in a federal civil rights action brought against him. 3. The Committee concluded that the President provided perjurious, false, and misleading testimony to a Federal grand jury concerning prior false and misleading statements he allowed his attorney to make to a Federal judge in that civil rights action.
    [Show full text]