DOCSLIB.ORG

Volume III: Document Supplement, Part A, William J. Clinton

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Volume III: Document Supplement, Part A, William J. Clinton 1 381 Volume III: Document Supplement, Part A William J. Clinton Statements 382 REFERRAL z. TOTHE UNITED STATESHOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES PURSUANTTO TITLE 28, UNITED STATES CODE, § 595(c) DOCUMENT SUPPLEMENT A SUBMITTEDBY THE OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENTCOUNSEL 383 Table of Contents 384 385 595(c) REPORT DOCI JMENT SUPPLEMENT A - CLINTON STATEMENTS INDEX Tab Description 1. l/l 7/98 Deposition of President William Jefferson Clinton in the case of Jones v. Clinton 2. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 1 - Definition of Sexual Relations 3. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 2 - Definition of Sexual Assault and Offense of Sexual Assault 4. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 3 - 18 USCS $2244 & $2245 - Sexual Abuse 5. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 5 - Office of the Governor Sexual Harassment Policy 6. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 6 - Third Annual Governor’s Quality Conference Agenda, Wednesday, May 8, 199 1 7. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 7 - 4/l/91 Memo from Partain to Hernrich re: Governor’s Role in Quality Conference 8. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 8 - DF Call 9. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 9 - President Clinton’s Responses to Plaintiffs Third Set of Interrogatories 10. 1/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 10 - President Clinton’s Responses to Plaintiffs First Set of Interrogatories 11. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 11 - Handwritten Note from Gennifer to Bill 12. l/l 7/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 12 - Handwritten Note from Gennifer to Bill Stamped Received on 2/25/91 13. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 13 - Handwritten and Typed Note of President Clinton’s encounter with Dolly Kyle at their Class Reunion 14. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 14 - President Clinton’s Supplemental Responses to Plaintiffs Second Set of Interrogatories 15. l/17/98 Deposition Exhibit No. 15 - Affidavit of Jane Doe #6 signed by Monica S. Lewinsky on l/7/98 16. 8/17/98 Grand Jury Testimony of President William Jefferson Clinton 386 Tab Description 17. 8/l 7/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC- 1 - Statement of President Clinton 18. 8/l 7/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC-2 - Jones v. Clinton Definition of Sexual Relations 19. 8/l 7/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC-3 - l/l 7/98 Deposition of President William Jefferson Clinton in the case of Jones v. Clinton 20. 8/17/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC-4 - Affidavit of Jane Doe #6 signed by Monica S. Lewinsky on l/7/98 21. 8/l 7/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC-5 - Photograph of President Clinton dated 816198 22. 8/l 7/98 Grand Jury Exhibit No. WJC-6 - Photograph of the tie worn by President Clinton dated 8/6/98 387 Tab 1 388 389 DEPOSITION OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 390 1 391 Tab 2 392 393 P&Joncsv. WdiamJ@kson Clinton aad- Fewon No. ~-C-94-290 (ED. A&) DEPOSITIONOF - JEFFERSONCXBITON . .. f . 394 . --r---.CBC.~., r.-wesY. I-..-.._ - .i “. I 9)QA 395 - Tab 3 396 397 PadaJonesv. E%tianaJderson CIintoprand D4nn~Fergrrson No.I&C-94290(=.Adc) DEPOSITION OF WIUAM JEFERSON CLINTON . 398 Tab 4 400 401 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 3 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 402 403 Tab 5 404 405 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 5 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 406 407 Tab 6 408 409 .____ Ir _ I’ Third&mud 1, Governor% Quality Chferenck Exceisior Botei Wednesday,May8,1991 i -AGENDA 411 Tab 7 - 412 413 April 1, 1991 TO: NancyBernrich FROM: Jan Putain NE: Governor's role in Quality COnfUUrCe The agenda for the Gcwemor's Quality ConiUenCe on Hay 8 is enclosed, as well as the mail-outswe heve ,.done thus far. We had planned for the Governor to kick off and to kp up the conference: however, his presence for the eatire day would be significant. The meeting is designed specifically for top manages, and they arq requested not to send substitutes. Pleas@ call me at 27327 if you have questions. cc: Dave Harrington Jim rjlakley 414 Third hrnaal Governor’s Quality Conference Wednesday,Blay 8, 1991 ExcelsiorNote1 8:00 Introductions Dave introducesGovezmr Governor talks about iaportanccof Quality Managementto nanuf8cturus 8nd thm.to the state's econ Qidin state government, continued cox bent to QBfacross the counw, etc. Governor introducesspeakers. 8:30 Lew Springer lo:oo Break 10:70 Lew Springer 12:oo LUnCh 1:oo JimIiarrington 2:oo Break 2:30 JimHarrington 3:30 Q&A 3:SO -W-UP Governor wraps-up 849-DC- 4:oo Adjourn 415 416 Tab 8 418 419 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 8 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER R 0 421 Tab 9 422 423 PRESIDENT CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO PLA~NT~FF’S THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES JONES V, CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 424 425 Tab 10 426 427 PRESIDENT CLINTON’S RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 428 Tab 11 430 431 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 11 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 432 433 Tab 12 434 435 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 12 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 436 437 Tab 13 438 439 DEPOSITION EXHIBIT 13 JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 440 - 441 Tab 14 442 443 PRESIDENT CLINTON’S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFF’S SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES JONES V. CLINTON SEALED PURSUANT TO COURT ORDER 445 Tab 15 446 1. Myname irJaneDoc#6 .I am24 years oldand I 2. in ~tcember 19, 1997, I was served with a subpoena I from the plaintiffto give a depositian and to produce documents in 1 the lawsuit filed by Paula Corbin Jonas against President William ; Jefferson Clinton andDaEmy Perguman. 3. Icaamtfathananyrsasonthattheplaiatiffuould seek informationfrum mc for bar case. 4. I hava ammr mat Ms. Jonas, MrdoIhavaany infomnatioa regarding the event8 she allagas ace at tha, Excelsior Hotel on Hay 8, 1931 01:any other information coaczdq any of the allegationsiahsrcasa. 5. IuOrkedatthet8hitc&u8eiatbe . - of 1995 as a WhiteHou8cintera.Beghamg iIl Decauber, 1995, I - ia tha ; Office of Legislative Affairs a8 a 8taff a8sistaat far corrcspoa&ncc. In April, 1996, I accapted a job as assistaat to the Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at ths U.S. Dqarmmt of Defense. I maintained that job until Decmbar 26, 1997. I am curreatlyuaexployedbut seekiag anew job. 6. Inthecourseofmy cmploylPcntattheVZhittEouseI' met President Clinton sevaraltimes. I also sawths Presidantat a number of social functioms held at the white House. when I worked as an intern, he appeared at occasional functians lttendsd by lilt and sevexal other intaras. The comespoa&maIdraftaduMlef worked at the Office of Legislative Affairs vu seea sad edited by supervisors who either had the Resi&atOs ligaature affirrclby mechanism or, I believe, had ths Presidsntsign ths v itself. 7. Ibavetheutmostrt~ctfortbcPrcaiarntvhobu always behavsd appropriatelyin my prewace. 8. I have aevex had a sua;ralrelationship with the 'Preside&, he did not propose that we have a smaaal ftlatioaship, he did sot offer me employaant or other benefits in cxchapgc.for a sexual relationship, he did not deay mc employment or other benefits for rejectinga smmal TC1atianPhi.p. .Ido aot Imow of Uly 448 Otherpersol3rshohada mucurl rehtiarrrhipwiththePresident,wu offered employment or other beaefitm io excbaagt for a mexuaJ relationship, or was denied euplmt or other benefit8 for' rejecting a lemdl relathaship. The occasiona that I maw the President after I left my.eaployment 8t the Whit+ Bone in April.: I 1996, were officirl receptiona,formal furrcti- or weata mhtad / to the U.S. Dcpartmcnt0fDefen8e,whrt Iwaa=rkingatthetimt. There were otherpeople prementonthamc occasions. 9. since I: d0 n0t posses8 any information that could possiblyk~tvazrttoth~lagafioru~by~~~~~or lead to rrhnfmible evidence irr'thirwe, 18sked my attorneyto prmdde thi8 affidavit to plaiatiff'r cou~el. bquirhg my depo8ition ia this matterwould cwsc di~ion tomy life, upeciallysincc I am looking for amployaeat,ltnwurrrzrted lttomey'm fee8 and co8t8, and constitute an immaion of my rigktoptimcy. IdeclEmaderthepamltyof~uqmxattheforego~ is true aadcorrect. l l l l 449 DISTRICT OF COLRMB~, SI): -CA s. -, w. fira duly 8wora oa oati lrccordiag to law, ckpomu and aaym that ahe haa read the foregoing’ 1 AFFIDA=TOFJSUIEDO&#~ byhermbmcribed, thatthemattua! eated herein are tmae to the bmt of her iafozamtion,kaowl* ; aad belief. 451 Tab 16 452 453 OFFICE OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL 1 ___-__________--_--___-_______x 2 : 3 TESTIMONY OF : Monday, August 17, 1998 : 4 WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON : Washington, D. C. : _-__----__-_-______-____--___-x 5 6 Videotaped testimony of 7 PRESIDENT WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON before the Independent Counsel, held at The White House, 8 Washington, D. C., beginning at 1:03 p.m., when were 9 present on behalf of the respective parties: 10 FOR THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL: KENNETH W. STARR, ESQ. 11 Independent Counsel JACKIE M. BENNETT, JR., ESQ. 12 ROBERT J. BITTMAN, ESQ. SOLOMON L. WISENBERG, ESQ. 13 Deputy Independent Counsel 14 MICHAEL W. EMMICK, ESQ. MARY ANNE WIRTH, ESQ. 15 BERNARD JAMES APPERSON, ESQ. Associate Independent Counsel 16 DAVID E. KENDALL, ESQ. 17 FOR THE PRESIDENT: NICOLE SELIGMAN, ESQ. Williams & Connolly 18 19 CHARLES F. C. RUFF, ESQ. Counsel to the President 20 ALSO PRESENT: JAMES P. RICKARDS, JR. Senior Consultant, OIC 21 GARY E. BRESNAHAN 22 White House Technical Staff 23 Secret Service Agent 24 . Court Reporter: Elizabeth A. Eastman 25 Deposition Services, Inc. 6245 Executive Boulevard 2300 M Street, N. W. Rockville, MD 20852 Suite 800 (301) 881-3344 Washington, D.C. 20037 /70?l 7R<1?10 454 be 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 MR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games
    TOKYO 2020 PARALYMPIC GAMES QUALIFICATION REGULATIONS REVISED EDITION, JULY 2020 INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 2 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 2. Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games Programme Overview 3. General IPC Regulations on Eligibility 4. IPC Redistribution Policy of Vacant Qualification Slots 5. Universality Wild Cards 6. Key Dates 7. Archery 8. Athletics 9. Badminton 10. Boccia 11. Canoe 12. Cycling (Track and Road) 13. Equestrian 14. Football 5-a-side 15. Goalball 16. Judo 17. Powerlifting 18. Rowing 19. Shooting 20. Swimming 21. Table Tennis 22. Taekwondo 23. Triathlon 24. Volleyball (Sitting) 25. Wheelchair Basketball 26. Wheelchair Fencing 27. Wheelchair Rugby 28. Wheelchair Tennis 29. Glossary 30. Register of Updates INTERNATIONAL PARALYMPIC COMMITTEE 3 INTRODUCTION These Qualification Regulations (Regulations) describe in detail how athletes and teams can qualify for the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games in each of the twenty- two (22) sports on the Tokyo 2020 Paralympic Games Programme (Games Programme). It provides to the National Paralympic Committees (NPCs), to National Federations (NFs), to sports administrators, coaches and to the athletes themselves the conditions that allow participation in the signature event of the Paralympic Movement. These Regulations present: • an overview of the Games Programme; • the general IPC regulations on eligibility; • the specific qualification criteria for each sport (in alphabetical order); and • a glossary of the terminology used throughout the Regulations. STRUCTURE OF SPORT-SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION
    [Show full text]
  • Clinton Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2019-030) February 5, 2019 The Honorable Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. Cipollone: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Clinton Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 19,503 pages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 2,274 pages restricted in whole or in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 17,229 pages. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is May 1, 2019, unless the former or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2208(b)-(d). Please let us know if you are able to complete your review before the expiration of the 60 working day period. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a)(1)(B), we will make this notice available to the public on the NARA website.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Media and the 2016 US Presidential Election
    Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Faris, Robert M., Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet & Society Research Paper. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33759251 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA AUGUST 2017 PARTISANSHIP, Robert Faris Hal Roberts PROPAGANDA, & Bruce Etling Nikki Bourassa DISINFORMATION Ethan Zuckerman Yochai Benkler Online Media & the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This paper is the result of months of effort and has only come to be as a result of the generous input of many people from the Berkman Klein Center and beyond. Jonas Kaiser and Paola Villarreal expanded our thinking around methods and interpretation. Brendan Roach provided excellent research assistance. Rebekah Heacock Jones helped get this research off the ground, and Justin Clark helped bring it home. We are grateful to Gretchen Weber, David Talbot, and Daniel Dennis Jones for their assistance in the production and publication of this study. This paper has also benefited from contributions of many outside the Berkman Klein community. The entire Media Cloud team at the Center for Civic Media at MIT’s Media Lab has been essential to this research.
    [Show full text]
  • © 2017 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works. 1 162 F.3D 670 United States Court of Appeals, District Of
    In re Sealed Case, 162 F.3d 670 (1998) 333 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 731 grand jury subpoenas connected with investigation of client. 162 F.3d 670 United States Court of Appeals, Cases that cite this headnote District of Columbia Circuit. IN RE: SEALED CASE [2] Federal Courts Persons Entitled to Seek Review or Nos. 98–3052, 98–3053 & 98–3059. Assert Arguments; Parties; Standing | One to whom a subpoena is directed may not Decided May 26, 1998. appeal the denial of a motion to quash that | subpoena but must either obey its commands Ordered Unsealed Dec. 1, 1998. or refuse to do so and contest the validity of Attorney moved to quash grand jury subpoenas seeking the subpoena if he is subsequently cited for documents and attorney's testimony in connection contempt on account of his failure to obey. with investigation of attorney's client and others for Cases that cite this headnote potential subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, intimidation of witnesses, and other violations of federal law in civil case against president of the United States. The [3] Federal Courts United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Particular persons Johnson, Chief Judge, ordered attorney to comply Client could appeal from district court order with subpoenas except to the extent that compliance requiring attorney to comply with grand jury would require disclosure of materials that could not subpoenas issued in course of investigation of be revealed without violating client's Fifth Amendment client and others for potential subornation of rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ASC) Annenberg School for Communication 1-1-2001 Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age Michael X. Delli Carpini University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Bruce A. Williams Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers Part of the Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons Recommended Citation (OVERRIDE) Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in the new media age. In W. L. Bennett & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics: Communication in the future of democracy (pp.160-181). Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/14 NOTE: At the time of publication, the author Michael X. Delli Carpini was affiliated with Columbia University. Currently January 2008, he is a faculty member of the Annenberg School for Communication at the University of Pennsylvania. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/14 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Let Us Infotain You: Politics in the New Media Age Abstract Political communications scholars, members of the press, and political elites have traditionally distinguished between entertainment and non-entertainment media. It is in public affairs media in general and news media in particular that politics is assumed to reside, and it is to this part of the media that the public is assumed to turn when engaging the political world. Politics, in this view, is a distinct and self- contained part of public life, and citizen is one role among many played by individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Starr Report Clinton Pdf
    The Starr Report Clinton Pdf Is Rudie intermontane or bareheaded after protractile Rodd categorised so kinda? Jean-Luc never rebaptized any harpoon wiggle inconclusively, is Dwaine sweetmeal and phoniest enough? Allopathic Hank fubs temporisingly or pillage stiltedly when Frederico is simon-pure. Currie testified that Ms. Alternatively transfixed and starr. 2 Referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth W Starr in Conformity with the Requirements. Lewinsky, she advance the President resumed their sexual contact. That I study the biological son and former President William Jefferson Clinton I having many. Starr Report Wikipedia. Constitution set because as impeachable offenses. What kinds of activities? Make your investment into the leaders of tomorrow through the Bill of Rights Institute today! This income that learn will keep emitting events with dry old property forever. American firms knew what they all those facts in the senate watergate episode. Links to documents about Whitewater investigation President Clinton's impeachment and Jones v Clinton. Starr has been accused of leaking prejudicial grand jury material in an plate to ship opinion said the Lewinsky case. Lewinsky would be debates about. Report new york post vince foster murder hillary clinton starr report the starr. Lee is the gifts he testified that a pdf ebooks without help from the park hyatt hotel that the independent counsel regarding the disclosures in the decade. PDF Twenty years later Bill Clinton's impeachment in. Howey INgov. Moody handled the report contained at that. Clinton could thus slide down impeachment and trial involve the Senate. To print the document click on Original Document link process open an original PDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 No. 6 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 19, 1999, at 2 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 The Senate met at 1:02 p.m., and was The CHIEF JUSTICE. The majority trol of the minority leader or his des- called to order by the Chief Justice of leader is recognized. ignee. the United States. Mr. LOTT. Mr. Chief Justice, there I ask unanimous consent that on f have been a number of inquiries from Tuesday the Senate recess then from Senators and others about some clari- the hours of 11:30 a.m. until 1 p.m. for TRIAL OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON fication with regard to the approxi- the weekly policy conferences. And I CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE mate times or the times we would be further ask consent that at 1 p.m., on UNITED STATES meeting on Saturday and Tuesday, and Tuesday, the Senate resume consider- The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Senate also how the afternoon will proceed, so ation of the articles of impeachment. will convene as a Court of Impeach- I will make some unanimous consent The CHIEF JUSTICE. Without objec- ment. The Chaplain will offer a prayer. requests to clarify that and give you a tion, it is so ordered. brief rundown on what I think the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • American History: President Clinton's Legal Problems
    08 March 2012 | MP3 at voaspecialenglish.com American History: President Clinton's Legal Problems AP President Clinton thanks Democrats in the House of Representatives who opposed his impeachment, as first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton watches, on December 19, 1998 STEVE EMBER: Welcome to THE MAKING OF A NATION – American history in VOA Special English. I'm Steve Ember. This week in our series, we continue the story of America's forty-second president, Bill Clinton. He was a popular and successful president who was re- elected in nineteen ninety-six. But he also became only the second president in American history ever to be put on trial in Congress. (MUSIC) Clinton's past in Arkansas became the source of accusations and questions about his character as he was running for president. These included questions about financial dealings with a land development company called Whitewater. In January of nineteen ninety-four, President Clinton asked Attorney General Janet Reno to appoint an independent lawyer to lead an investigation. She named 2 a Republican, but some critics said her choice was too friendly to the Clinton administration. He was replaced by another Republican, Kenneth Starr. In nineteen ninety-five the Senate Judiciary Committee began its own investigation of the president. The committee later reported that it had not found evidence of any crimes. However, because the committee was led by Democrats, there was continuing suspicion of the president among Republicans. The main cause of that suspicion dated back to a purchase of land in Arkansas years earlier. Bill and Hillary Clinton had bought the land in nineteen seventy eight -- the year he was first elected governor of that state.
    [Show full text]
  • United States District Court for the District of Columbia
    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CARA LESLIE ALEXANDER, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil No. 96-2123 ) 97-1288 ) (RCL) FEDERAL BUREAU OF ) INVESTIGATION, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter comes before the court on Plaintiffs’ Motion [827] to Compel Answers to Plaintiffs’ First Set of Interrogatories to the Executive Office of the President Pursuant to Court Order of April 13, 1998. Upon consideration of this motion, and the opposition and reply thereto, the court will GRANT the plaintiffs’ motion. I. Background The underlying allegations in this case arise from what has become popularly known as “Filegate.” Plaintiffs allege that their privacy interests were violated when the FBI improperly handed over to the White House hundreds of FBI files of former political appointees and government employees from the Reagan and Bush Administrations. This particular dispute revolves around interrogatories pertaining to Mike McCurry, Ann Lewis, Rahm Emanuel, Sidney Blumenthal and Bruce Lindsey. Plaintiffs served these interrogatories pertaining to these five current or former officials on May 13, 1999. The EOP responded on July 16, 1999. Plaintiffs now seek to compel further answers to the following lines of questioning: 1. Any and all knowledge these officials have, including any meetings held or other communications made, about the obtaining of the FBI files of former White House Travel Office employees Billy Ray Dale, John Dreylinger, Barney Brasseux, Ralph Maughan, Robert Van Eimerren, and John McSweeney (Interrogatories 11, 35, 40 and 47). 2. Any and all knowledge these officials have, including any meetings held or other communications made, about the release or use of any documents between Kathleen Willey and President Clinton or his aides, or documents relating to telephone calls or visits 2 between Willey and the President or his aides (Interrogatories 15, 37, and 42).
    [Show full text]
  • Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations"
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 79 Issue 3 Symposium: "Law &": Philosophical, Psychological, Linguistic, and Biological Article 24 Perspectives on Legal Scholarship October 2004 Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations" Peter Tiersma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter Tiersma, Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations", 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 927 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol79/iss3/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DID CLINTON LIE?: DEFINING "SEXUAL RELATIONS" PETER TIERSMA* With the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton now a distant memory, we can step back and consider the matter somewhat more dispassionately than was possible in the midst of such an intense and highly politicized debate. The focus of the impeach- ment hearings was on whether Clinton perjured himself and engaged in obstruction of justice when answering questions relating to the nature of his relationship with a former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. I will limit my observations in this Article to the question of whether Clinton committed perjury, and in particular, I will focus on whether he lied when he denied having had a "sexual relationship" with Lewinsky. Yet the real subject of this Article is not the Clinton impeach- ment, nor is it primarily about perjury law, although I will have things to say about each.
    [Show full text]
  • Hillary Rodham Clinton and Her Appeals to the American People
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Crafting Rhetorics of Trust: Hillary Rodham Clinton and her Appeals to the American People Chelsea Anne Spring Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Spring, Chelsea Anne, "Crafting Rhetorics of Trust: Hillary Rodham Clinton and her Appeals to the American People" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 491. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/491 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This study examines Hillary Clinton’s public discourse at various points in her career, analyzing which rhetorical strategies she uses to build and maintain trust between herself and the American public. To do so, this study examines five moments in Clinton’s career in which she actively employs rhetoric that affects the public’s perception of Clinton as a trustworthy or untrustworthy figure. The five case studies analyzed in this study are Bill and Hillary Clinton’s 1992 interview on 60 Minutes, following accusations of Bill’s extramarital affair with Gennifer Flowers; Hillary Clinton’s tears in New Hampshire on the 2008 presidential campaign trail; Hillary’s “3am Phone Call” ad, released during the 2008 primary campaign; Hillary’s social media efforts to brand herself as a grandmother during the 2016 presidential campaign; and Hillary’s infamous email scandal that unfolded during the 2016 presidential campaign.
    [Show full text]
  • Sharyl Attkisson
    10/10/2016 Trump’s Troubles & A Cheat Sheet on Allegations against Bill Clinton | Sharyl Attkisson Sharyl Attkisson Untouchable Subjects. Fearless Reporting. Navigation Home News Fast and Furious Benghazi Medical & Vaccine Other Topics » Stonewalled: A NYT Best Seller Full Measure Cover Stories Astroturf and Propaganda You are here: Home › News › Trump’s Troubles & A Cheat Sheet on Allegations against Bill Clinton Trump’s Troubles & A Cheat Sheet on Allegations against Bill Clinton by sattkisson on October 9, 2016 in News Leave a comment Three weeks before the election, many Americans are expressing distaste for where the campaigns and news media have taken us. Yet they are paying rapt attention. With Donald Trump’s lewd remarks about women being highlighted, there are rumors of more tapes yet-to-come in carefully-timed releases. Read the Washington Post story on Donald Trump’s “extremely lewd conversation about women in 2005” https://sharylattkisson.com/trumps-troubles-a-cheat-sheet-on-allegations-against-bill-clinton/ 1/14 10/10/2016 Trump’s Troubles & A Cheat Sheet on Allegations against Bill Clinton | Sharyl Attkisson There are also indications that the Trump campaign intends to try to make an issue of Bill Clinton’s accusers and Hillary’s long ago alleged role in controversializing and discrediting the women (which she denies). In recent days, one accuser, Juanita Broaddrick gave a tearful interview recounting her allegations. Watch Donald Trump’s apology posted on Facebook Here’s a blast-from-the-past cheat sheet of some of the most-discussed allegations by Bill Clinton’s accusers, which Clinton has denied: Read left-leaning Vox.com’s take on Juanita Broaddrick P aula Jones alleges in 1994 that Clinton propositioned her and exposed himself three years earlier as governor of Arkansas.
    [Show full text]