DOCSLIB.ORG

© 2017 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works. 1 162 F.3D 670 United States Court of Appeals, District Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
© 2017 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Original U.S. Government Works. 1 162 F.3D 670 United States Court of Appeals, District Of In re Sealed Case, 162 F.3d 670 (1998) 333 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 731 grand jury subpoenas connected with investigation of client. 162 F.3d 670 United States Court of Appeals, Cases that cite this headnote District of Columbia Circuit. IN RE: SEALED CASE [2] Federal Courts Persons Entitled to Seek Review or Nos. 98–3052, 98–3053 & 98–3059. Assert Arguments; Parties; Standing | One to whom a subpoena is directed may not Decided May 26, 1998. appeal the denial of a motion to quash that | subpoena but must either obey its commands Ordered Unsealed Dec. 1, 1998. or refuse to do so and contest the validity of Attorney moved to quash grand jury subpoenas seeking the subpoena if he is subsequently cited for documents and attorney's testimony in connection contempt on account of his failure to obey. with investigation of attorney's client and others for Cases that cite this headnote potential subornation of perjury, obstruction of justice, intimidation of witnesses, and other violations of federal law in civil case against president of the United States. The [3] Federal Courts United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Particular persons Johnson, Chief Judge, ordered attorney to comply Client could appeal from district court order with subpoenas except to the extent that compliance requiring attorney to comply with grand jury would require disclosure of materials that could not subpoenas issued in course of investigation of be revealed without violating client's Fifth Amendment client and others for potential subornation of rights. Attorney and client appealed, and government perjury, obstruction of justice, intimidation of cross-appealed. The Court of Appeals, Randolph, Circuit witnesses, and other violations of federal law Judge, held that: (1) Court lacked jurisdiction over in civil case against president of the United attorney's appeal, but had jurisdiction over client's appeal; States, which excluded only materials that (2) client's statement in civil case was “material” within could not be revealed without violating client's meaning of perjury statute; (3) government sufficiently Fifth Amendment rights; client was holder established elements of obstruction of justice by client to of attorney-client privilege, and attorney support application of crime-fraud exception to attorney- made sworn declaration that he would give client privilege; and (4) district court should have denied testimony if ordered. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. motions in their entirety because there was no valid claim 5. of attorney-client privilege. 1 Cases that cite this headnote Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. [4] Perjury Materiality in general West Headnotes (11) A statement is “material,” under perjury statute, if it has a natural tendency to influence, or was capable of influencing, the [1] Federal Courts decision of the tribunal in making a particular Preliminary proceedings; depositions and determination. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1623(a). discovery Court of Appeals lacked jurisdiction over 2 Cases that cite this headnote attorney's appeal from district court order which denied attorney's motion to quash [5] Perjury Materiality in general © 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 1 In re Sealed Case, 162 F.3d 670 (1998) 333 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 731 The central object of any materiality inquiry, under perjury statute, is whether 3 Cases that cite this headnote the misrepresentation or concealment was predictably capable of affecting, that is, had [9] Grand Jury a natural tendency to affect, the official Relation of inquiry to illegally-obtained decision. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1623(a). evidence 1 Cases that cite this headnote No grand jury witness may refuse to answer questions on the ground that the questions are based on illegally obtained evidence. [6] Perjury Materiality of affidavits and statements Cases that cite this headnote therein Witness's statement in affidavit that she had [10] Witnesses not had sexual relationship with president Privilege as to production of documents of the United States, which was made in Documents transferred from the accused to connection with third party's civil action his attorney are obtainable without personal against president, was “material” to civil compulsion on the accused, and hence action within meaning of perjury statute, as the accused's Fifth Amendment privilege is witness's statements were predictably capable not violated by enforcement of subpoena of affecting decision in civil action, since directed toward his attorneys, regardless of witness filed her affidavit for that very whether the Amendment would have barred purpose. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1623(a). a subpoena directing the accused to produce 1 Cases that cite this headnote the documents while they were in his hands. U.S.C.A. Const.Amend. 5. [7] Obstructing Justice 1 Cases that cite this headnote Knowledge or intent Obstruction of justice statute is satisfied [11] Grand Jury whenever a person, with the intent to influence Privilege judicial or grand jury proceedings, takes District court should have denied in their actions having the natural and probable effect entirety motions to quash grand jury of doing so. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1503. subpoenas directed to attorney, rather than 2 Cases that cite this headnote excepting materials that could not be revealed without violating client's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, absent valid [8] Grand Jury claim of attorney-client privilege. U.S.C.A. Privilege Const.Amend. 5. Government sufficiently established, through grand jury testimony and documents, 4 Cases that cite this headnote elements of obstruction of justice by witness to support application of crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege claimed by witness, as to materials and testimony that were *671 **246 Appeals from the United States District subject to grand jury subpoenas directed to Court for the District of Columbia (98ms00068). attorney in connection with investigation of Attorneys and Law Firms witness for her actions taken during third party's civil action against president of the Nathaniel H. Speights filed the briefs for appellant United States. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1503. Monica Lewinsky. © 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 2 In re Sealed Case, 162 F.3d 670 (1998) 333 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 731 4. Response of the United States of America to Motion Charles J. Ogletree, Jr. filed the briefs for appellant Francis for Extension of Time to File Opposition to Motion for D. Carter, Esq. Summary Dismissal and Motion to Set Briefing Schedule (May 5, 1998); Robert J. Bittman, Deputy Independent Counsel, filed the briefs for cross-appellant the United States. *672 **247 5. Order of this Court granting motion to BEFORE: GINSBURG, RANDOLPH, and TATEL, expedite and setting briefing schedule (May 5, 1998); Circuit Judges. 6. Brief of Cross–Appellant United States (May 11, 1998); ORDER 7. Cross–Appellant's Appendix (May 11, 1998); PER CURIAM 8. Brief for Appellant Francis D. Carter, Esq. (May 11, 1998); Upon consideration of the responses of Francis D. Carter and of the United States of America, acting through the 9. Appendix for Appellant Francis D. Carter, Esq. (May Office of the Independent Counsel, to the Court's order 11, 1998); to show cause why the opinion in this case should not be unsealed, it is 10. Opening Brief of Appellant Monica Lewinsky (May 11, 1998); ORDERED, that the opinion in this case is no longer protected from public disclosure by Rule 6(e), 11. Appendix of Appellant Monica Lewinsky (May 11, FED.R.CRIM.P., in view of the public release, by the 1998); House Committee on the Judiciary, of Mr. Carter's grand jury testimony transcript, see H.R. Doc. 105–316, at 393– 12. Request for Judicial Notice by Appellant Monica 433 (Sept. 28, 1998); and it is further Lewinsky (May 11, 1998); ORDERED, that the judgment and opinion of this Court 13. Brief of Appellee United States (May 14, 1998); in In re: Sealed Case, No. 98–3052 (D.C.Cir. May 26, 1998), shall be unsealed; and it is further 14. Brief for Cross–Appellee Francis D. Carter, Esq. (May 14, 1998); ORDERED, that the order to show cause is discharged; and it is further 15. Reply Brief for Appellant Francis D. Carter, Esq. (May 15, 1998); ORDERED, pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 47.1(c), that the following materials also shall be unsealed: 16. Reply Brief of Appellant Monica Lewinsky (Lodged May 15, 1998); 1. Motion of the United States of America for Summary Dismissal of Appeal of Francis D. Carter, Esq., for Want 17. Reply Brief of Cross–Appellant United States (May of Jurisdiction (May 1, 1998); 15, 1998); 2. Motion of the United States of America to Expedite 18. Motion to Night File Reply Brief of Monica Lewinsky Consideration of the Appeal and for an Abbreviated (May 19, 1998); Briefing Schedule (May 1, 1998); 19. Order of this Court granting leave to file lodged reply 3. Motion of Francis D. Carter for Extension of Time to brief out of time (May 26, 1998); File Opposition to Motion for Summary Dismissal and Motion to Set Briefing Schedule (May 5, 1998); 20. Order of this Court to show cause why the opinion in this case should not be unsealed (Nov. 16, 1998); © 2017 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 3 In re Sealed Case, 162 F.3d 670 (1998) 333 U.S.App.D.C. 245, 50 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 731 intimidated witnesses, or otherwise violated federal law ... 21. Response of the United States of America to the in dealing with witnesses, potential witnesses, attorneys, November 16, 1998 Order to Show Cause (Nov.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Clinton Presidential Records in Response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Requests Listed in Attachment A
    VIA EMAIL (LM 2019-030) February 5, 2019 The Honorable Pat A. Cipollone Counsel to the President The White House Washington, D.C. 20502 Dear Mr. Cipollone: In accordance with the requirements of the Presidential Records Act (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C. §§2201-2209, this letter constitutes a formal notice from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) to the incumbent President of our intent to open Clinton Presidential records in response to the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests listed in Attachment A. These records, consisting of 19,503 pages, have been reviewed for all applicable FOIA exemptions, resulting in 2,274 pages restricted in whole or in part. NARA is proposing to open the remaining 17,229 pages. A copy of any records proposed for release under this notice will be provided to you upon your request. We are also concurrently informing former President Clinton’s representative, Bruce Lindsey, of our intent to release these records. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a), NARA will release the records 60 working days from the date of this letter, which is May 1, 2019, unless the former or incumbent President requests a one-time extension of an additional 30 working days or asserts a constitutionally based privilege, in accordance with 44 U.S.C. 2208(b)-(d). Please let us know if you are able to complete your review before the expiration of the 60 working day period. Pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 2208(a)(1)(B), we will make this notice available to the public on the NARA website.
    [Show full text]
  • Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoration in Monica Lewinsky's TED Talk, "The Rp Ice of Shame" Eric Mishne
    Speaker & Gavel Volume 55 Article 4 Issue 1 Spring 2018 July 2018 Enacting Compassion: Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoration in Monica Lewinsky's TED Talk, "The rP ice of Shame" Eric Mishne Follow this and additional works at: https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/speaker-gavel Part of the Communication Technology and New Media Commons, and the Speech and Rhetorical Studies Commons Recommended Citation Mishne, E. (2018). Enacting Compassion: Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoration in Monica Lewinsky’s TED Talk, “The Price of Shame.” Speaker & Gavel, 55(1), 60-71. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. It has been accepted for inclusion in Speaker & Gavel by an authorized editor of Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato. Mishne: Enacting Compassion: Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoratio Enacting Compassion: Enactment and the Theory of Image Restoration in Monica Lewinsky’s TED Talk, “The Price of Shame.” Eric Mishne – Independent Scholar Eric Mishne (MA , Ohio University) Eric is an independent public speaking coach for high-school forensics and non-academic contexts. He is also the Executive Director of a not- for-profit theatre company in Columbus, Ohio. Prior to that, he served as an assistant forensic coach as Cedarville University and Ohio University. Eric holds a Master’s degree from Western Michigan University, and a Master’s degree from Ohio University. “Special thanks to Dr. Roger Aden for his guidance and counseling on the genesis of this article.” This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presidential Politics of Aaron Sorkin's the West Wing
    Bucknell University Bucknell Digital Commons Honors Theses Student Theses Spring 2019 "Let Bartlet Be Bartlet:" The rP esidential Politics of Aaron Sorkin's The esW t Wing Marjory Madeline Zuk [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses Part of the American Politics Commons Recommended Citation Zuk, Marjory Madeline, ""Let Bartlet Be Bartlet:" The rP esidential Politics of Aaron Sorkin's The eW st Wing" (2019). Honors Theses. 493. https://digitalcommons.bucknell.edu/honors_theses/493 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses at Bucknell Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Bucknell Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1 2 I would like to thank my wonderful advisor, Professor Meinke, for all of his patience and guidance throughout this project. I so appreciate his willingness to help me with this process – there is no way this thesis would exist without him. Thank you for encouraging me to think deeper and to explore new paths. I will miss geeking out with you every week. I would also like to thank my friends for all of their love and support as I have slowly evolved into a gremlin who lives in Bertrand UL1. I promise I will be fun again soon. I would like to thank my professors in the Theatre department for all of their encouragement as I’ve stepped out of my comfort zone. Thank you to my dad, who has answered all of my panic-induced phone calls and reminded me to rest and eat along the way.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON's RESPONSE to the LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an Examination
    ABSTRACT POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL by Kelsey Snyder Through an examination of gender, politics, and media during the time of the Lewinsky scandal, this project shows that conversations about the first lady shifted throughout 1998. Just after the allegations were made public, the press and American people fought against the forthright position that Hillary took; the expectations of traditional first ladies they had known before were not met. After facing backlash via the press, the first lady receded to more acceptably defined notions of her actions, based largely in late 20th century conservative definitions of appropriate gender roles. By the end of 1998, consideration of a run for the Senate and increased public support for her more traditional image provided a compromise for Hillary Rodham Clinton’s public image. Having finally met the expectations of the nation, the press spoke less of the first lady in comparison to family values and almost exclusively by means of her political abilities. POLITICAL (IN)DISCRETION: HILLARY CLINTON’S RESPONSE TO THE LEWINSKY SCANDAL A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts Department of History by Kelsey Snyder Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2015 Advisor __________________________________________ Kimberly Hamlin Reader ___________________________________________ Marguerite Shaffer Reader ___________________________________________ Monica Schneider TABLE OF CONTENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations"
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 79 Issue 3 Symposium: "Law &": Philosophical, Psychological, Linguistic, and Biological Article 24 Perspectives on Legal Scholarship October 2004 Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations" Peter Tiersma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter Tiersma, Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations", 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 927 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol79/iss3/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DID CLINTON LIE?: DEFINING "SEXUAL RELATIONS" PETER TIERSMA* With the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton now a distant memory, we can step back and consider the matter somewhat more dispassionately than was possible in the midst of such an intense and highly politicized debate. The focus of the impeach- ment hearings was on whether Clinton perjured himself and engaged in obstruction of justice when answering questions relating to the nature of his relationship with a former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. I will limit my observations in this Article to the question of whether Clinton committed perjury, and in particular, I will focus on whether he lied when he denied having had a "sexual relationship" with Lewinsky. Yet the real subject of this Article is not the Clinton impeach- ment, nor is it primarily about perjury law, although I will have things to say about each.
    [Show full text]
  • Torah and Western Thought: Jewish and Western Texts in Conversation
    Torah and Western Thought: Jewish and Western Texts in Conversation JANUARY 2021 From Plymouth to Pennsylvania Avenue: America and the Hebrew Bible. America, Born of the Hebrew Bible BY LIEL LEIBOVITZ This book review of the Straus Center’s volume Proclaim Liberty Throughout the Land: The Hebrew Bible in the United States originally appeared in Tablet Magazine at tabletmag.com and is reprinted with permission. America, G.K. Chesterton once observed, was “a nation God and delight in all our ways, so that we shall see much more with the soul of a church.” Make that a shul: As Proclaim Liberty of His wisdom, power, goodness, and truth than formerly we Throughout the Land argues, “the American Republic was born have been acquainted with. We shall find that the God of Israel to the music of the Hebrew Bible.” is among us, when ten of us shall be able to resist a thousand of our enemies, when He shall make us a praise and glory, that Its editors—Rabbi Meir Y. Soloveichik, Matthew Holbreich, men shall say of succeeding plantations, the Lord make it like Jonathan Silver, and Stuart W. Halpern, of the Straus Center for that of New England.” It’s a model of a covenantal political Torah and Western Thought at Yeshiva University—make their community taken straight from the prophet Micah, who case, in the fine tradition of our wise forefathers, by laying reminded us that “it hath been told thee, O man, what is good, before us scroll after scroll of source material, showing us the and what the Lord doth require of thee: Only to do justly, and to Biblical thread that binds everything from the Mayflower love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God.” Compact to Lincoln’s second inaugural address.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of the Clinton Impeachment and the Death of the Independent Counsel Statute: Toward Depoliticization
    Volume 102 Issue 1 Article 5 September 1999 The Politics of the Clinton Impeachment and the Death of the Independent Counsel Statute: Toward Depoliticization Marjorie Cohn Thomas Jefferson School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr Part of the Courts Commons, and the Legal Profession Commons Recommended Citation Marjorie Cohn, The Politics of the Clinton Impeachment and the Death of the Independent Counsel Statute: Toward Depoliticization, 102 W. Va. L. Rev. (1999). Available at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/wvlr/vol102/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the WVU College of Law at The Research Repository @ WVU. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Virginia Law Review by an authorized editor of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Cohn: The Politics of the Clinton Impeachment and the Death of the Inde THE POLITICS OF THE CLINTON IMPEACHMENT AND THE DEATH OF THE INDEPENDENT COUNSEL STATUTE: TOWARD DEPOLITICIZATION Marjorie Cohn I. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................59 II. THE ANDREW JOHNSON IMPEACHMENT ..................................60 III. TE LEGACY OF WATERGATE .................................................60 IV. THE POLITICAL APPOINTMENT OF AN "INDEPENDENT COUNSEL"... ..............................................................................................63 V. STARR'S W AR ..........................................................................66
    [Show full text]
  • The Independent Counsel Investigation, The
    Fordham Law Review Volume 68 Issue 3 Article 9 1999 The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Independent Counsel and the Charges of Leaking: A Brief Case Study Ronald D. Rotunda Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Ronald D. Rotunda, The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Independent Counsel and the Charges of Leaking: A Brief Case Study, 68 Fordham L. Rev. 869 (1999). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol68/iss3/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Independent Counsel Investigation, the Impeachment Proceedings, and President Clinton's Defense: Inquiries into the Role and Responsibilities of Lawyers, Symposium, Independent Counsel and the Charges of Leaking: A Brief Case Study Cover Page Footnote Albert E. Jenner, Jr. Professor of Law, University of Illinois College of Law. The author has been a special consultant to the Office of the Independent Counsel investigating matters relating to President Clinton, the real estate allegations often called "Whitewater," and other associated investigations that were sent to the Office by Attorney General Janet Reno.
    [Show full text]
  • Law Meets Food: Breakfast at Hilary's
    Law Meets Food: Breakfast at Hilary's FEDWA MALTI-DOUGLAS* Ifany one individualhas become averitable industry in thepast decade inAmerica, it is surely Hillary Rodham Clinton. Books, tabloids, Web pages, jokes, bumper stickers, games, soap bars, hot sauce bottles-they tell only part of the story. From Whitewater to Travelgate, from Gennifer Flowers to Monica Lewinsky, Hillary Rodham Clinton has been-and continues to be-in the firing line. But rather than moving in the areas of these more sordid gates, including Zippergate AKA Monicagate (or even Fomigate as Arianna Huffington would have it1), let us instead venture forth into what I should like to call Foodgate. Foodgate functions as a nexus that brings together law, food, and politics. The daily special. Or as they say in France, "le chef vous propose." Grapefruit. Scrambled eggs. Home fries. Bacon. Huevos divorciados. Cookies. And, oh, let us not forget the marmalade. And come to think of it, should we not include some tea here as well? No. I am afraid I am not really offering this menu so that we can choose an item to order. Rather, I am offering it merely as a set of intellectual hors d'oeuvres to whet our collective appetite for the analytical feast in which I hope the reader will join me as we set out to have breakfast at Hillary's. This breakfast is a fantasy meal in which we will indulge ourselves at the invitation of various commentators and pundits. Foodgate functions as a trap to catch the career woman First Lady. She herself stumbled into it with a remark during the 1992 campaign about not staying home to bake cookies and have teas, instead pursuing her career, the law.2 As this comment became telegraphed, to use Kathleen Hall Jamieson's terminology, into a cookies- and-tea reference,' it showed deep-seated anxieties about food, bringing in its wake not only a world of words but one of images as well, as even cartoonists jumped into the fray.
    [Show full text]
  • “Slow News Day” Guests: Eli Attie and Nancy Altman JOSH: Hey There, Josh Here, Before We
    The West Wing Weekly 5.12: “Slow News Day” Guests: Eli Attie and Nancy Altman JOSH: Hey there, Josh here, before we start, just a warning. We had some technical issues with the audio file from my side of this conversation, so the recording will sound a bit low-fi. Enjoy. [Intro Music] HRISHI: You’re listening to The West Wing Weekly. I’m Hrishikesh Hirway. JOSH: And I’m Joshua Malina. HRISHI: And today, we’re talking about episode twelve from season five. It’s called “Slow News Day.” JOSH: It was written by Eli Attie. It was directed by Julie Hébert. And it first aired on Feb-ruary, 4th in the year 2004. HRISHI: I’m going to read the Warner Bros. official synopsis for this episode, “Toby convinces Bartlet to secretly sanction his solo attempt to make history by reforming Social Security, but Toby’s efforts to recruit a Republican Senator and a Democratic cohort are publicly divulged, forcing the administration to back down, while Josh and Leo are left clueless and furious. Meanwhile, an equally unaware C.J. parries with a reporter who’s ready to print all the backstage details. Also, the female staffers complain to Josh about a new employee, a mysterious, seductively-dressed woman assigned to Toby.” JOSH: There’s a split infinitive in there, but otherwise it’s a fairly comprehensive synopsis. HRISHI: Although I don’t know about any female staffers actually complaining to Josh. JOSH: Nor do I remember that. Maybe our special guest can enlighten us. HRISHI: Yeah. Joining us for this episode is one of our favorite guests, which is why we ask him back all the time, Eli Attie.
    [Show full text]
  • The Clinton/Lewinsky Story How Accurate? How Fair?
    The Clinton/Lewinsky Story How Accurate? How Fair? Project for Excellence in Journalism 1900 M Street NW Suite 210 | Washington DC 2009 202-293-7394 | www.journalism.org Overall Summary Contrary to White House accusations, those doing the bulk of the original reporting did not ferry false leaks and fabrications into coverage of the Clinton/Lewinsky story. But in some important cases, the press leaned on the suspicions of investigators that did not hold up and downplayed the denials of the accused, according to a new study. The findings of the study, conducted by the Committee of Concerned Journalists, raise questions about whether the press always maintained adequate skepticism about its sources. There were occasions, moreover, when the press got ahead of the facts in its basic reporting. Others then used that work to engage in sometimes reckless speculation and propaganda. Overall, while the initial reporting of certain well-known stories, such as the blue dress, were proven right, and none was made out of whole cloth, it is an oversimplification to say the press has been vindicated. The study, conducted under the supervision of journalist Jim Doyle, former special assistant to the Watergate Special Prosecutors, was an attempt to discern the nature of the press coverage to date by examining several major threads of the story and comparing them to the Starr Report and its supporting evidentiary material. The goal was to make a disciplined and detailed examination of the coverage in order to balance accusations on both sides that the reporting has been proven substantiated or that it had been manipulated by misleading leaks.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Clinton Tv Declaration on Monica Lewinsky
    Bill Clinton Tv Declaration On Monica Lewinsky Walloping and motorized Moshe whistled some voussoir so bias! Stern motorizing silently. Refractory Melvyn equipoising too. During a deposition questions were concerned because he spoke sort this is allowed to meet with them on bills he! President Clinton apologizing for the Monica Lewinsky affair tried to tail the effects of. He authorizes, through the Attorney General, all prosecutions brought on behalf of the people of the United States in carrying out his constitutional duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed. Of harassing conduct has become a tv show his testimony that it is bill clinton tv declaration on monica lewinsky acknowledged conduct themselves with? Johnson served the remaining ten months of you term, prospect the standoff against the Republicans continued. Attorney for President Clinton. What did you said you are focused on occasion on record indicates what was only means for dun laoghaire hit save. Construct a declaration of dignity considerations, bill clinton tv declaration on monica lewinsky matter of justice, energetic and often? Clinton kept his party back him they stop impeachment Trump's. Declaration of Independence Rhetoric Public Affairs 1 199 143-14. It was too was after ms lewinsky had that? President werethose listed eleven grounds for lunch with respect tothe hall from. Behalf asked only his power by tripp had something about your independent counsel should. For henry hyde also be in massive data sharing stories, bill clinton tv declaration on monica lewinsky informed me, of president interpreted this office of impeachment trial of what did nothave sexual? Judge starr seized his jones lawyers might contact by bill clinton tv declaration on monica lewinsky later? Several gifts given lewinsky together on political skills, false because there sort that solemn occasion might have i learned that you.
    [Show full text]