DOCSLIB.ORG

Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives 1 105th Congress Ser. No. 19 2d Session COMMITTEE PRINT "! IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY: WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESENTATIONS BY INVESTIGATIVE COUNSEL IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY PURSUANT TO H. RES. 581: PRESENTATIONS BY INVESTIGATIVE COUNSEL COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS HENRY J. HYDE, Chairman DECEMBER 10, 1998 U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53±322 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R. ROTHMAN, New Jersey ASA HUTCHINSON, Arkansas THOMAS BARRETT, Wisconsin EDWARD A. PEASE, Indiana CHRISTOPHER B. CANNON, Utah JAMES E. ROGAN, California LINDSEY O. GRAHAM, South Carolina MARY BONO, California (II) MAJORITY STAFF THOMAS E. MOONEY, SR., Chief of Staff-General Counsel JON W. DUDAS, Deputy General Counsel-Staff Director DIANA L. SCHACHT, Deputy Staff Director-Chief Counsel DANIEL M. FREEMAN, Parliamentarian-Counsel PAUL J. MCNULTY, Director of Communications-Chief Counsel JOSEPH H. GIBSON, Chief Counsel RICK FILKINS, Counsel SHAREE M. FREEMAN, Counsel PETER J. LEVINSON, Counsel JOHN F. MAUTZ, IV, Counsel WILLIAM E. MOSCHELLA, Counsel STEPHEN PINKOS, Counsel GEORGE M. FISHMAN, Chief Counsel DAVID P. SCHIPPERS, Chief Investigative MITCH GLAZIER, Chief Counsel Counsel JOHN H. LADD, Chief Counsel RAYMOND V. SMIETANKA, Chief Counsel SUSAN BOGART, Investigative Counsel LAURA ANN BAXTER, Counsel ROBERT S. HOOVER, Counsel DANIEL J. BRYANT, Counsel JOHN C. KOCORAS, Counsel CATHLEEN A. CLEAVER, Counsel BERLE S. LITTMANN, Investigator VINCE GARLOCK, Counsel STEPHEN P. LYNCH, Professional Staff JAMES W. HARPER, Counsel Member SUSAN JENSEN±CONKLIN, Counsel CHARLES F. MARINO, Counsel DEBRA K. LAMAN, Counsel JEFFREY J. PAVLETIC, Investigative Counsel BLAINE S. MERRITT, Counsel THOMAS M. SCHIPPERS, Investigative Counsel NICOLE R. NASON, Counsel ALBERT F. TRACY, Investigator GLENN R. SCHMITT, Counsel PETER J. WACKS, Investigator JIM Y. WILON, Counsel DIANA L. WOZNICKI, Investigator MINORITY STAFF JULIAN EPSTEIN, Minority Chief Counsel-Staff Director PERRY H. APELBAUM, Minority General ABBE D. LOWELL, Minority Chief Investigative Counsel Counsel DAVID G. LACHMANN, Counsel SAMPAK P. GARG, Investigative Counsel CYNTHIA A. R. MARTIN, Counsel STEVEN F. REICH, Investigative Counsel HENRY MONIZ, Counsel DEBORAH L. RHODE, Investigative Counsel STEPHANIE J. PETERS, Counsel KEVIN M. SIMPSON, Investigative Counsel SAMARA T. RYDER, Counsel LIS W. WIEHL, Investigative Counsel BRIAN P. WOOLFOLK, Counsel (III) C O N T E N T S COMMITTEE PRINT Page December 10, 1998 ................................................................................................... 1 OPENING STATEMENT Hyde, Hon. Henry J., a Representative in Congress from the State of Illinois, and Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary ..................................................... 2 STATEMENTS Lowell, Abbe, Minority Chief Investigative Counsel ............................................ 7 Schippers, David, Chief Investigative Counsel ..................................................... 62 PREPARED STATEMENTS Lowell, Abbe, Minority Chief Investigative Counsel ............................................ 35 Schippers, David, Chief Investigative Counsel ..................................................... 103 APPENDIX Appendices to the Presentation by David P. Schippers, Chief Investigative Counsel: Appendix AÐCharts ......................................................................................... 143 A. The President's Contacts Alone With Lewinsky ................................ 145 B. The President's Telephone Contacts With Lewinsky ........................ 148 C. Lewinsky's Gifts to the President ....................................................... 152 D. The President's Gifts to Lewinsky ...................................................... 154 E. 12/5/97 Facsimile Transmission of Witness List in Jones v. Clin- ton ........................................................................................................... 155 F. The December 19, 1997 Subpoena to Lewinsky in Jones v. Clinton 156 G. December 19, 1997 Activities Following Lewinsky's Receipt of Subpoena ................................................................................................ 157 H. The President's December 23, 1997 Response to Interrogatory No. 10 in Jones v. Clinton ..................................................................... 158 I. The President's December 23, 1997 Response to Interrogatory No. 11 in Jones v. Clinton ............................................................................ 159 J. December 28, 1997, The President's Final Meeting With Lewinsky and Concealment of Gifts ...................................................................... 160 K. Currie's Cell Phone Records for 12/28/97 ........................................... 161 L. The President's Statements About Concealing Gifts ......................... 162 M. Lewinsky's Draft Affidavit .................................................................. 163 N. Lewinsky Final Affidavit dated January 7, 1998 Paragraph 8, Jones v. Clinton ..................................................................................... 166 O. Filing Lewinsky's Affidavit and Motion to Quash (1/14/98±1/17/ 98) ........................................................................................................... 167 P. Mission Accomplished: Lewinsky Signs Her Affidavit and Is Hired By Revlon in New York (1/5/98±1/19/98) ............................................. 168 Q. The President's Involvement With Lewinsky's Job Search .............. 173 R. Jordan's Testimony About His Pre-Witness List Job Search Ef- forts ......................................................................................................... 174 S. Activity Following The President's Deposition (1/17/98±1/19/98) ..... 175 T. The President's Statements to Currie 1/18/98 .................................... 181 U. The President's Denial of Sexual Relations ....................................... 182 (V) VI Page Appendices to the Presentation by David P. Schippers, Chief Investigative CounselÐContinued Appendix AÐChartsÐContinued V. The President's 1/21/98 Denial of Sexual Relations to Blumenthal, Podesta and Morris ................................................................................ 182 W. The White House 1/24/98 ``Talking Points'' ....................................... 184 X. The President's Claims That He Was Truthful With Aides .............. 185 Y. The Three Options of a Grand Jury Witness ..................................... 186 Z. The President's Grand Jury ``Statement'' ........................................... 187 Appendix BÐExhibits ...................................................................................... 188 Telephone records: 1. Summary Chart, 12/19/97 ............................................................. 188 2. Currie cell phone records, 12/28/97 .............................................. 190 3. Summary chart, 1/6/98 .................................................................. 192 4. Summary chart, 1/7/98 .................................................................. 193 5. Summary chart, 1/15/98±1/16/98 .................................................. 194 6. Summary chart, 1/17/98 ................................................................ 196 7. Summary chart, 1/18/98 ................................................................ 197 8. Summary chart, 1/19/98 ................................................................ 199 Court documents: 9. Jones v. Clinton, January 29, 1998 District Court Order re- garding discovery ............................................................................ 202 10. President Clinton's Answer to First Amended Complaint, Jones v. Clinton .............................................................................. 206 11. In re: Sealed Case, Nos. 98±3053 & 3059, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia ........................................................ 223 12. Jane Doe #6 (Lewinsky) Affidavit filed In Jones v. Clinton ..... 234 13. ``Sexual Relations'' definition ...................................................... 237 Miscellaneous: 14. 1/18/98 Drudge Report ................................................................. 238 15. Jones' attorneys fax cover sheet of witness list to Bennett ...... 240 16. White House ``Talking Points,'' January 24, 1998 ..................... 242 17. LA Times 1/25/98 Article regarding White House ``Talking Points'' ............................................................................................. 244 18. Response of William J. Clinton to Judiciary Committee Ques- tions ................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SENATE—Tuesday, March 7, 2006
    March 7, 2006 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD—SENATE 2723 SENATE—Tuesday, March 7, 2006 The Senate met at 9:45 a.m. and was We will be returning to the lobbying side our borders, burning the American called to order by the PRESIDENT pro reform bill today. We will begin consid- flag is intended to intimidate, not to tempore (Mr. STEVENS). ering amendments. Therefore, in addi- engage in constructive speech. tion to the LIHEAP bill, we will have I believe the amendment process is PRAYER votes in relation to the amendments to the appropriate remedy to the Court’s The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- the lobbying reform bill. 1989 decision. As Harvard law professor fered the following prayer. I also expect the Senate to recess Richard Parker explains: Let us pray. from 12:30 until 2:15 for the weekly The amendment process is essential to the Our Father in heaven, today we party luncheons. Constitution’s deepest foundation—the prin- praise You because Your loving kind- I say again to all colleagues who ciple of popular sovereignty affirmed in its ness endures forever. You have blessed want to finish the lobbying bill this first words, ‘‘We the people.’’ Making use of week that we certainly want to allow this process reaffirms and thus preserves this land with freedom and abundance. that foundation. Thank You for spacious skies and adequate time for Members to offer amber waves of grain. amendments. I urge Members to come Since I first came to the Senate in Teach us to be thankful even when forward early.
    [Show full text]
  • The Starr Report Clinton Pdf
    The Starr Report Clinton Pdf Is Rudie intermontane or bareheaded after protractile Rodd categorised so kinda? Jean-Luc never rebaptized any harpoon wiggle inconclusively, is Dwaine sweetmeal and phoniest enough? Allopathic Hank fubs temporisingly or pillage stiltedly when Frederico is simon-pure. Currie testified that Ms. Alternatively transfixed and starr. 2 Referral from Independent Counsel Kenneth W Starr in Conformity with the Requirements. Lewinsky, she advance the President resumed their sexual contact. That I study the biological son and former President William Jefferson Clinton I having many. Starr Report Wikipedia. Constitution set because as impeachable offenses. What kinds of activities? Make your investment into the leaders of tomorrow through the Bill of Rights Institute today! This income that learn will keep emitting events with dry old property forever. American firms knew what they all those facts in the senate watergate episode. Links to documents about Whitewater investigation President Clinton's impeachment and Jones v Clinton. Starr has been accused of leaking prejudicial grand jury material in an plate to ship opinion said the Lewinsky case. Lewinsky would be debates about. Report new york post vince foster murder hillary clinton starr report the starr. Lee is the gifts he testified that a pdf ebooks without help from the park hyatt hotel that the independent counsel regarding the disclosures in the decade. PDF Twenty years later Bill Clinton's impeachment in. Howey INgov. Moody handled the report contained at that. Clinton could thus slide down impeachment and trial involve the Senate. To print the document click on Original Document link process open an original PDF.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 106 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 145 WASHINGTON, FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 No. 6 House of Representatives The House was not in session today. Its next meeting will be held on Tuesday, January 19, 1999, at 2 p.m. Senate FRIDAY, JANUARY 15, 1999 The Senate met at 1:02 p.m., and was The CHIEF JUSTICE. The majority trol of the minority leader or his des- called to order by the Chief Justice of leader is recognized. ignee. the United States. Mr. LOTT. Mr. Chief Justice, there I ask unanimous consent that on f have been a number of inquiries from Tuesday the Senate recess then from Senators and others about some clari- the hours of 11:30 a.m. until 1 p.m. for TRIAL OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON fication with regard to the approxi- the weekly policy conferences. And I CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE mate times or the times we would be further ask consent that at 1 p.m., on UNITED STATES meeting on Saturday and Tuesday, and Tuesday, the Senate resume consider- The CHIEF JUSTICE. The Senate also how the afternoon will proceed, so ation of the articles of impeachment. will convene as a Court of Impeach- I will make some unanimous consent The CHIEF JUSTICE. Without objec- ment. The Chaplain will offer a prayer. requests to clarify that and give you a tion, it is so ordered. brief rundown on what I think the Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • White House Compliance with Committee Subpoenas Hearings
    WHITE HOUSE COMPLIANCE WITH COMMITTEE SUBPOENAS HEARINGS BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION NOVEMBER 6 AND 7, 1997 Serial No. 105–61 Printed for the use of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 45–405 CC WASHINGTON : 1998 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Jan 31 2003 08:13 May 28, 2003 Jkt 085679 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 E:\HEARINGS\45405 45405 COMMITTEE ON GOVERNMENT REFORM AND OVERSIGHT DAN BURTON, Indiana, Chairman BENJAMIN A. GILMAN, New York HENRY A. WAXMAN, California J. DENNIS HASTERT, Illinois TOM LANTOS, California CONSTANCE A. MORELLA, Maryland ROBERT E. WISE, JR., West Virginia CHRISTOPHER SHAYS, Connecticut MAJOR R. OWENS, New York STEVEN SCHIFF, New Mexico EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York CHRISTOPHER COX, California PAUL E. KANJORSKI, Pennsylvania ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida GARY A. CONDIT, California JOHN M. MCHUGH, New York CAROLYN B. MALONEY, New York STEPHEN HORN, California THOMAS M. BARRETT, Wisconsin JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON, Washington, THOMAS M. DAVIS, Virginia DC DAVID M. MCINTOSH, Indiana CHAKA FATTAH, Pennsylvania MARK E. SOUDER, Indiana ELIJAH E. CUMMINGS, Maryland JOE SCARBOROUGH, Florida DENNIS J. KUCINICH, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH, Illinois STEVEN C. LATOURETTE, Ohio DANNY K. DAVIS, Illinois MARSHALL ‘‘MARK’’ SANFORD, South JOHN F. TIERNEY, Massachusetts Carolina JIM TURNER, Texas JOHN E.
    [Show full text]
  • American History: President Clinton's Legal Problems
    08 March 2012 | MP3 at voaspecialenglish.com American History: President Clinton's Legal Problems AP President Clinton thanks Democrats in the House of Representatives who opposed his impeachment, as first lady Hillary Rodham Clinton watches, on December 19, 1998 STEVE EMBER: Welcome to THE MAKING OF A NATION – American history in VOA Special English. I'm Steve Ember. This week in our series, we continue the story of America's forty-second president, Bill Clinton. He was a popular and successful president who was re- elected in nineteen ninety-six. But he also became only the second president in American history ever to be put on trial in Congress. (MUSIC) Clinton's past in Arkansas became the source of accusations and questions about his character as he was running for president. These included questions about financial dealings with a land development company called Whitewater. In January of nineteen ninety-four, President Clinton asked Attorney General Janet Reno to appoint an independent lawyer to lead an investigation. She named 2 a Republican, but some critics said her choice was too friendly to the Clinton administration. He was replaced by another Republican, Kenneth Starr. In nineteen ninety-five the Senate Judiciary Committee began its own investigation of the president. The committee later reported that it had not found evidence of any crimes. However, because the committee was led by Democrats, there was continuing suspicion of the president among Republicans. The main cause of that suspicion dated back to a purchase of land in Arkansas years earlier. Bill and Hillary Clinton had bought the land in nineteen seventy eight -- the year he was first elected governor of that state.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations"
    Chicago-Kent Law Review Volume 79 Issue 3 Symposium: "Law &": Philosophical, Psychological, Linguistic, and Biological Article 24 Perspectives on Legal Scholarship October 2004 Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations" Peter Tiersma Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter Tiersma, Did Clinton Lie?: Defining "Sexual Relations", 79 Chi.-Kent L. Rev. 927 (2004). Available at: https://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol79/iss3/24 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Chicago-Kent Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons @ IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. DID CLINTON LIE?: DEFINING "SEXUAL RELATIONS" PETER TIERSMA* With the impeachment proceedings against President Clinton now a distant memory, we can step back and consider the matter somewhat more dispassionately than was possible in the midst of such an intense and highly politicized debate. The focus of the impeach- ment hearings was on whether Clinton perjured himself and engaged in obstruction of justice when answering questions relating to the nature of his relationship with a former White House intern, Monica Lewinsky. I will limit my observations in this Article to the question of whether Clinton committed perjury, and in particular, I will focus on whether he lied when he denied having had a "sexual relationship" with Lewinsky. Yet the real subject of this Article is not the Clinton impeach- ment, nor is it primarily about perjury law, although I will have things to say about each.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilots in the Offshore Oil Industry
    CE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO AND CLC No. 467 -ger--3 Issue 2, 1999 OPEIU reaches agreement covering pilots in the offshore oil industry Historic contract provides 35 percent wage increase The Office and Professional Employ- "This contract is the result of the dedica- OPEIU International Vice President J.B. es will be realized in the first year. The com- ees International Union (OPEIU) has tion of our members who steadfastly held Moss and International Business Rep- pany will also pay substantial signing reached a contract agreement with together during protracted negotiations," said resentative Paul Bohelski teamed up with bonuses, with each pilot receiving $600 per Offshore Logistics, Inc. (OLOG) that will Jim Morgan, a veteran pilot and president of Morgan and the negotiating committee to year of service to OLOG. Additional mean a 35 percent wage increase over the Local 107. "We achieved our goals of fair help realize this contract. increases were negotiated for pilots working life of the contract for the 208 pilots em- pay, improved health insurance, retirement The four-year agreement provides for 35 premium shifts. ployed by the company. The pilots are security and dignity and respect on the job. percent wage increases over the life of the Pilots will also see significant reductions members of OPEIU Local 107. "This contract will greatly improve the contract - up to 24 percent of the increas- Continued on page 3 The agreement is the first contract that lives of pilots throughout the Gulf region covers pilots who provide helicopter service who will go from being the least compen- to the offshore oil industry in the Gulf of sated pilots in the industry to having work- Mexico; it also covers pilots providing ser- ing conditions that are the envy of pilots vice to oil field and other operations in from Mobile to Corpus Christi," Morgan Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST- ******** 06/25/2001 ***** SENTENCE File: E:\TEXTPACK
    ******** T E X T P A C K 1 Aug 00 Routine -LIST- ******** 06/25/2001 ***** SENTENCE file: E:\TEXTPACK\NYT_EX.SEN -ID1- -ID2- -ID3- T e x t----------------------------------- 990113 035128 00001 tna1pada3 - 11 : 32pm Jan 13 , 1999 EST ( of 35135 ) } 00002 * " It ain ' t over til it ' s over " During the impeachment trial of Judge Alcee L . Hastings , Senator Specter stated : [T]he impeachment process [] relies in significant measure on decisions of the court and the opinion of judges . [T]he decisions and interpretations of the courts should be highly instructive to us . In our system of Government , it has been the courts that through the years have been called upon to construe , define and apply the provisions of our Constitution . Their decisions reflect our values and our evolving notions of justice . Although we are a branch of Government coequal with the judiciary , and by the Constitution vested with the " sole " power to try impeachments , I believe that the words and reasoning of judges who have struggled with the meaning and application of the Constitution and its provisions ought to be given great heed because that jurisprudence embodies the values of fairness and justice that ought to be the polestar of our own determinations . S . Doc . 101-18 , 101st Cong . , 1st Sess . at 740-41 . As Senator Specter observed , judicial rules have been developed and refined over the years to assure that court proceedings are fair , and that an accused is assured the necessary tools to prepare a proper defense , including proper notice . 035129 00001 jakbert - 11 : 35pm Jan 13 , 1999 EST ( of 35135 ) > 00002 tnal : } 00003 *Therefore , your point , verbose as written , is moot .
    [Show full text]
  • Hypocrites and Barking Harlots: the Clinton-Lewinsky Affair and the Attack on Women
    William & Mary Journal of Race, Gender, and Social Justice Volume 5 (1998-1999) Issue 1 William & Mary Journal of Women and Article 3 the Law December 1998 Hypocrites and Barking Harlots: The Clinton-Lewinsky Affair and the Attack on Women Christina R. Wells Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl Part of the Law and Gender Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Repository Citation Christina R. Wells, Hypocrites and Barking Harlots: The Clinton-Lewinsky Affair and the Attack on Women, 5 Wm. & Mary J. Women & L. 151 (1998), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl/ vol5/iss1/3 Copyright c 1998 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmjowl ESSAY HYPOCRITES AND BARKING HARLOTS: THE CLINTON- LEWINSKY AFFAIR AND THE ATTACK ON WOMEN CHRISTINA E. WELLS* Given the status of the participants, the nature of the scandal, the potential political ramifications, and the melee accompanying the recently-released Independent Counsel's report, the unrelenting media coverage of the Clinton-Lewinsky affair is unsurprising. Wallowing in the libidinous transgressions of this country's most powerful leader would prove almost irresistible to a citizenry practically obsessed with sex. Of course, this coverage has provided the President's critics with an unending platform from which to call, depending upon their point of view, for his (a) apology, (b) resignation, or (c) impeachment. Many of the President's detrac- tors, however, have not limited their criticism to his actions. Rather, they have included within their castigation women who still support the President-apparently on the theory that such women are hopelessly stupid or naive (women in general) or outrageously hypocritical (feminists in particular).' As a woman and a feminist, I am tired of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Depoliticizing the Interim Appointments of US Attorneys
    LIVE AND LEARN: DEPOLITICIZING THE INTERIM APPOINTMENTS OF U.S. ATTORNEYS t Laurie L. Levenson The United States Attorney is the representative not of an ordinary party to a controversy, but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all; and whose interest, therefore, in a criminal prosecution is not that it shall win a case, but that justice shall be done.' I. INTRODUCTION U.S. Attorneys play a special role in our federal criminal justice system. As the representatives of the federal government, they have the responsibility of enforcing federal laws in their respective districts.2 3 Although U.S. Attorneys serve "at the pleasure of the President," the4 goal is to have a fair and impartial prosecutor administering the laws. The recent firing of eight U.S. Attorneys has called into question at- tempts to politicize the role of this vital Office. By attempting to give the Attorney General the power to make indefinite interim appointments, I Professor of Law, William M. Rains Fellow & Director, Center for Ethical Advocacy, Loyola Law School. Thank you to John McKay, a man of true integrity, for inviting me to participate in the Symposium at Seattle University School of Law. His courage, as well as that of his fellow U.S. Attorneys, Paul Carlton, David Iglesias, Bill Cummins III, and Carol Lam, should serve as an inspi- ration for others dedicated to public service. I also wish to extend my gratitude to the editors of the Seattle University Law Review and to my wonderful research assistants, Emil Petrossian, Lindsay Meurs, William Smyth, and Mary Gordon.
    [Show full text]
  • Report Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives H. Res
    105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES 1 105TH CONGRESS REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 105±830 "! IMPEACHMENT OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES together with ADDITIONAL, MINORITY, AND DISSENTING VIEWS TO ACCOMPANY H. RES. 611 DECEMBER 16, 1998 (pursuant to clause 2(l)(5) of rule XI).ÐReferred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE ★ 52±880 WASHINGTON : 1998 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HENRY J. HYDE, Illinois, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin BARNEY FRANK, Massachusetts BILL McCOLLUM, Florida CHARLES E. SCHUMER, New York GEORGE W. GEKAS, Pennsylvania HOWARD L. BERMAN, California HOWARD COBLE, North Carolina RICK BOUCHER, Virginia LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas JERROLD NADLER, New York ELTON GALLEGLY, California ROBERT C. SCOTT, Virginia CHARLES T. CANADY, Florida MELVIN L. WATT, North Carolina BOB INGLIS, South Carolina ZOE LOFGREN, California BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas STEPHEN E. BUYER, Indiana MAXINE WATERS, California ED BRYANT, Tennessee MARTIN T. MEEHAN, Massachusetts STEVE CHABOT, Ohio WILLIAM D. DELAHUNT, Massachusetts BOB BARR, Georgia ROBERT WEXLER, Florida WILLIAM L. JENKINS, Tennessee STEVEN R.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H5556
    H5556 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE May 22, 2007 section 546 in two critical respects. First, it ef- tigation, which they surmised may have led to Mr. CONYERS. Mr. Speaker, I yield fectively removed district court judges from the their forced resignations. back the balance of my time. interim appointment process and vested the Mr. Speaker, the USA PATRIOT Act Reau- The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. PAS- Attorney General with the sole power to ap- thorization provision on interim United States TOR). The question is on the motion of- point interim United States Attorneys. Second, Attorneys should be repealed for two reasons. fered by the gentleman from Michigan the Act eliminated the 120-day limit on the First, Members of Congress did not get an op- (Mr. CONYERS) that the House suspend term of an interim United States Attorney ap- portunity to vet or debate the provision that is the rules and pass the Senate bill, S. pointed by the Attorney General. As a result, current law. Rather, the Republican leadership 214. judicial input in the interim appointment proc- of the 109th Congress slipped the provision The question was taken. ess was eliminated. Even more problematic, it into the Conference Report at the request of The SPEAKER pro tempore. In the created a possible loophole that permit United the Department of Justice. Not even Senate opinion of the Chair, two-thirds being States Attorneys appointed on an interim basis Judiciary Chairman ARLEN SPECTER, whose in the affirmative, the ayes have it. to serve indefinitely without ever being sub- chief of staff was responsible for inserting the Mr.
    [Show full text]