Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC) 2004-2005

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC) 2004-2005 Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC) 2004-2005 Award Number: NA16FL2813 Semi Annual Progress Report For Period: January 1, 2005 - June 30, 2005 SUBMITTED TO: NOAA SUBMITTED By: ROBERT E. BUETER, PH.D. MOTE MARINE LABORATORY 1600 KEN THOMPSON PARKWAY SARASOTA,FL 34236 (941) 388-4441 AUGUST 24, 2005 MOTE MARINE LABORATORY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1039 SEMI-ANNUAL PERFORMANCE REPORT Award Number: NA16FL2813 Amount of Award: Federal Share $ 1,787,864 Project Title: Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC), 2004-2005 Recipient: Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida Award Period: July 1,2004 to June 30, 2005 Period Covered by this Report: January 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005 Primary Project Tasks: The following primary tasks were scheduled for this six-month period: Mote Marine Laboratory Component lao Shark life history, migration and stock structure I b. Relative abundance studies lc. Satellite tag testing and development I d. Freshwater habitat use 1e . Mortality rates of sharks within a coastal nursery area I f. Essential Fish Habitat environmental studies I g. Use of elemental analysis to investigate nursery habitat in bull sharks 1h . Ecosystem and population modeling Ii. Nurse shark reproductive life history, genetics and habitat studies Ij. Whale shark research in the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea lk. Publications and scientific conferences 1 Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Component 2a. Eastern orth Pacific chondrichthya n life history data matrix 2b. Age, growth, and demographic studies 2c. Age validation studies 2d. Reproductive biology 2e. Feeding ecology 2f. Stable isotope analysis 2g. Habitat associations and nursery grounds 2h. Population genetic studies 2i. Shelf, slope and pelagic surveys 2j. Eastern Pacific shark fisheries analysis 2k. Taxonomic studies Virginia Institute of Marine Science Component 3a. Relati ve abundance and distribution studies 3b. Age, growth, and demographic studies 3c. Habitat utilization and migration studies 3d. Shark energetic and osmoregulatory studies 3e. Sandbar shark genetic studies 3f. Publications and conferences University of Florida Component 4a. Fishery independent sampling 4b. Age, growth, and reproduction 4c. Tagging and tracking of bull sharks 4f. Age-structured simulation model for dusky shark 4h. Regional variation in age determination characteristics of vertebrae 4i. Ova rian tissue of Atlantic stingray 4j. International Shark Attack File 4k. Web- and media-based public education 41. Project Shark Awareness 4m. Requests for information 4n. Publications and conferences 2 Summary of Results: General Project Overview Significant progress was made during this six-month period of the project. Important advances by the NSRC were made in both field and laboratory approaches to understanding the life history, abundance and environmental biology of shark species important in commercial and recreational fisheries. NSRC researchers and students continued to make significant scientific contributions through publications and conference presentations during the six-month period. There were no major problems experienced with the overall project during the period. Mote Marine Laboratory Report (R. Hueter, P/I) Mote's Center for Shark Research (CSR) served as project coordinator. No problems were encountered in the administration of the project. The following technical accomplishments were achieved during the reporting period: Shark life history, migration and stock structure. From January through June 2005, the Mote CSR captured a total of 602 sharks of 12 species. Of these sharks, 475 were tagged and released. During this same period, 24 recaptured sharks were reported and logged in the CSR database. Of these, the longest at large was a YOY blacktip shark (Careharhinus limbatus) tagged in September of 1996 along the south end of Pine Island Sound, Charlotte Harbor, Florida. It was recaptured in April of 2005 after 3,158 days (8.65 yrs) at liberty, in Boca Grande Pass, Charlotte Harbor, Florida, about 20 nm (37 km) from its original tagging site. The longest minimum at-sea distance traveled in these recaptures was reported from a blacktip shark tagged near Bahia Honda Key (Florida Keys) in January of2002. This shark was recaptured in June of2005 in the St. Joseph Bay area of Florida's panhandle, about 381 nm (706 km) from its tagging site. Three surveys for large coastal sharks were undertaken during the period, two in winter (one in the Florida Keys during February 2005 and one off Sarasota in March 2005) and one in spring (J LIn e 2005) off Sarasota. All surveys were carried out aboard the RIV Eugenie Clark except the March 2005 trip, which utilized the Florida Institute of Oceanography vessel RlV Suneoaster. Each survey consisted of 4-5 days of longline and drurnline sampling. The February survey caught 41 sharks, comprising Ginglymostoma eirratum (26), C. limbatus (11), C. aeronotus (1), C. leueas (1), C. plumbeus (1) and Sphyrna mokarran (1). The March trip caught 39 sharks, comprising C. brevipinna (30), C. aeronotus (5), C. limbatus (2), C. plumbeus (1) and Negaprion brevirostris (1). The June trip caught 63 sharks, comprising G. cirratum (20), C. aeronotus (10), Rhizoprionodon terraenovae (8), C. leueas (7), N. brevirostris (7), S. mokarran (6), C. limbatus (4) and Galeoeerdo euvier (1). In Terra Ceia Bay, Florida, 65 sets using four gear types (rod and reel, gill net, longline, and drumline) were conducted for this project during the period ofthis report. These efforts resulted in 3 the capture of 38 sharks of 4 species including C. limbatus (32), C. acronotus (3), S. tiburo (2) and C. leucas (1). A total of33 ofthese sharks were tagged in released using conventional tags, internal acoustic tags, external acoustic tags, or a combination of two types. To examine the movement patterns and behavioral responses of sharks translocated from one nursery area (Charlotte Harbor, Florida) to another (Terra Ceia Bay, Florida) a series of24 acoustic hydrophones were deployed within Terra Ceia Bay. Hydrophones were deployed in May of2005 and were used to monitor the presence and movements of sharks from both nurseries. A total of9 C. limbatus were successfully transported from Charlotte Harbor to Terra Ceia Bay. All transported individuals were weighed, measured, sexed and tagged with an external dart tag prior to fitting with acoustic transmitters. After transmitters were attached, sharks were released within the study site. Six transported sharks were released in the northern end of the study site in the region most commonly inhabited by resident C. limbatus. The remaining three individuals were released at the southern end ofthe study site distant from local animals . Six C. limbatus were captured within Terra Ceia Bay and treated as control animals for translocation experiments. Control animals were placed in transport containers for 3 hours (the duration of transport form Charlotte Harbor to Terra Ceia Bay) prior to fitting with acoustic transmitters to mimic the conditions for transport animals. All 15 sharks survived transport and surgery procedures and were released within the study site. Data from acoustic receivers are currently being gathered to examine the movement and behavior patterns of resident and translocated individuals. Due to adverse environmental conditions (hurricanes, red tide events) no additional sharks have been or will be transported during 2005. Relative abundance studies. During the period ofthis report, no blacktip relative abundance sets in primary nurseries were conducted. We decided to suspend these field activities temporarily due to concerns over high mortality of pups in the nursery as a result of red tide, as well as the direct effects of our own gillnet fishing. Instead, a large-scale analysis of this project's 10-year dataset of three Florida Gulf coast nurseries (Yankeetown, lower Tampa Bay and Pine Island Sound) was conducted and its results presented at the annual American Elasmobranch Society Meeting, July 2005, in Tampa. Overall, 970 quantitative gill nets sets were made between 1995 and 2004 resulting in the capture of8,257 sharks ofthirteen species, of which 3,842 were juvenile blacktips. Recaptures have been reported from 149 of the tagged sharks comprising 5 species. First-year blacktips have demonstrated movements of more than 280 nautical miles after leaving their summer nursery grounds. Recapture data further indicates a pattern of sharks returning to their natal nursery areas the following season and in subsequent years. A general linear model was used to standardize the CPUE data. Significant differences in the juvenile blacktip catch were found between years, nursery areas, and between grids within a nursery area. When looking at the blacktip catch rates over the entire 10- year period, there were no apparent trends that would be indicative of population level changes. Satellite tag testing and development. Tank-testing of satellite tags was not conducted during this period as the research tanks of Mote CSR's MERF (Marine Experimental Research Facility) were in use for other projects. However, field studies using PAT satellite tags continued. Three Wildlife Computers PAT tags deployed on whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) in previous project periods did not report, leading us to consider the possible reasons for satellite tag failure in this case. These reasons include: 4 • Failure of the hardware or software in the tag. • Physical damage
Recommended publications
  • Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015)
    IUCN Red List version 2015.4: Table 7 Last Updated: 19 November 2015 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2014-2015) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2014 (IUCN Red List version 2014.3) and 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015-4) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2014) List (2015) change version Category Category MAMMALS Aonyx capensis African Clawless Otter LC NT N 2015-2 Ailurus fulgens Red Panda VU EN N 2015-4
    [Show full text]
  • Fishery Bulletin/U S Dept of Commerce National Oceanic
    ASPECTS OF THE BIOWGY OF TWO SCYLIORHINID SHARKS, APRISTURUS BRUNNEUS AND PARMATURUS XANIURUS, FROM THE UPPER CONTINENTAL SWPE OFF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JEFFREY N. CROSSI ABSTRACf The distribution. abundance, reproductive cycle. and food habits of two scyliorhinid sharks are discussed. Catsharks occurred on 87% of 71 longline sets and in 6% of 48 trawls. Longline catches were stratified by habitat into banks (hard substrate) and mud (soft substrate). ApriBtu'l"lUl brllnnell.8 occurred more frequently on mud sets than on bank sets. but its abundance was similar in both habitats. Pa'MIlaturus :l'a·t/.iu~ oC<.'l1rred equally frequently on mud and bank sets, but it was more abundant on bank sets. Catches of both species consisted of adults and adolescents; juveniles were rare or absent. Historical collections suggest that juveniles are mesopelagic. Male P. zaniurull matured ata smaller size than male A. brrt1meus. Females of both species matured at about the same size and fecundity increased with female size. The proportion of body weight devoted to gonads and maximum oocyte size were greater among P. 2:a1liurus, but fecundity and the proportion of females carrying egg cases were greater among A. brun'IU.l1ts. Seasonal changes in gonadal develop­ ment were not well defined for either species. Members of both populations may have been reproduc­ tively active throughout the year. The diets of both species comprised. in order of importance, crustaceans, teleosts, and squids. Most prey consumed were pelagic; however, it is not known where in the water column the catsharks obtained their prey. The Scyliorhinidae is the largest family of living ParmatWr1"S Xa11Jiu1'US Gilbert, the filetail cat­ sharks with about 94 valid species (Nelson 1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Snakes, Centipedes, Snakepedes, and Centiserpents: Conflation of Liminal Species in Maya Iconography and Ethnozoology
    f No. 9, 2004 WAYEB NOTES ISSN 1379-8286 SNAKES, CENTIPEDES, SNAKEPEDES, AND CENTISERPENTS: CONFLATION OF LIMINAL SPECIES IN MAYA ICONOGRAPHY AND ETHNOZOOLOGY. (Workshop Closing Paper Presented at the XXIVth Linda Schele Forum on Maya Hieroglyphic Writing at the University of Texas at Austin, March 2000) Harri Kettunen1 and Bon V. Davis II2 1 University of Helsinki 2 University of Texas at Austin Abstract Since the identification of centipedes in the Maya hieroglyphic corpus and iconography in 1994 by Nikolai Grube and Werner Nahm (Grube & Nahm 1994: 702), epigraphers and iconographers alike have debated whether the serpentine creatures in Maya iconography depict imaginative snakes or centipedes. In this paper we argue that most serpentine creatures with unrealistically depicted heads are neither snakes nor centipedes, but a conflation of both, and even have characteristics of other animals, such as sharks and crocodiles. Thus these creatures should more aptly be designated as zoomorphs, monsters, centiserpents, or dragons. In the present article the topic will be examined using iconographic, epigraphic, zoological, and ethozoological data. Acknowledgements We would like to express our thanks to Justin Kerr for directing the Workshop on Maya ceramics at the XXIVth Maya Meeting in Austin. We would also like to thank Justin for making available hundreds of roll-out photographs of Maya ceramics and for offering us his insights on Maya iconography. Furthermore, we would like to thank Nancy Elder, the head librarian of the Biological Sciences Library at the University of Texas at Austin for providing us numerous articles relating to our topic and for directing us to relevant sources during our research on centipedes.
    [Show full text]
  • And Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications
    DePaul University Via Sapientiae College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations College of Science and Health Spring 6-14-2019 Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications Phillip C. Sternes DePaul University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Sternes, Phillip C., "Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications" (2019). College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations. 327. https://via.library.depaul.edu/csh_etd/327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Science and Health at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Science and Health Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Body Forms in Sharks (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii), and Their Functional, Ecological, and Evolutionary Implications A Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science June 2019 By Phillip C. Sternes Department of Biological Sciences College of Science and Health DePaul University Chicago, Illinois Table of Contents Table of Contents.............................................................................................................................ii List of Tables..................................................................................................................................iv
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans the Conservation Status Of
    The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans The Conservation Status of Edited by The Conservation Status of North American, Central and Caribbean Chondrichthyans North American, Central American, Peter M. Kyne, John K. Carlson, David A. Ebert, Sonja V. Fordham, Joseph J. Bizzarro, Rachel T. Graham, David W. Kulka, Emily E. Tewes, Lucy R. Harrison and Nicholas K. Dulvy L.R. Harrison and N.K. Dulvy E.E. Tewes, Kulka, D.W. Graham, R.T. Bizzarro, J.J. Fordham, Ebert, S.V. Carlson, D.A. J.K. Kyne, P.M. Edited by and Caribbean Chondrichthyans Executive Summary This report from the IUCN Shark Specialist Group includes the first compilation of conservation status assessments for the 282 chondrichthyan species (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) recorded from North American, Central American, and Caribbean waters. The status and needs of those species assessed against the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species criteria as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable) are highlighted. An overview of regional issues and a discussion of current and future management measures are also presented. A primary aim of the report is to inform the development of chondrichthyan research, conservation, and management priorities for the North American, Central American, and Caribbean region. Results show that 13.5% of chondrichthyans occurring in the region qualify for one of the three threatened categories. These species face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild (Critically Endangered; 1.4%), a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Endangered; 1.8%), or a high risk of extinction in the wild (Vulnerable; 10.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • The Sharks of North America
    THE SHARKS OF NORTH AMERICA JOSE I. CASTRO COLOR ILLUSTRATIONS BY DIANE ROME PEEBLES OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Foreword, by Eugenie Clark v Mosaic gulper shark, Centrophorus tesselatus 79 Preface vii Little gulper shark, Centrophorus uyato 81 Acknowledgments ix Minigulper, Centrophorus sp. A 84 Slender gulper, Centrophorus sp. B 85 Introduction 3 Birdbeak dogfish, Deania calcea 86 How to use this book 3 Arrowhead dogfish, Deaniaprofundorum 89 Description of species accounts 3 Illustrations 6 Family Etmopteridae, The Black Dogfishes Glossary 7 and Lanternsharks 91 Bibliography 7 Black dogfish, Centroscyllium fabricii 93 The knowledge and study of sharks 7 Pacific black dogfish, Centroscyllium nigrum 96 The shark literature 8 Emerald or blurred lanternshark, Etmopterus bigelowi 98 Lined lanternshark, Etmopterus bullisi 101 Broadband lanternshark, Etmopterus gracilispinis 103 A KEY TO THE FAMILIES OF Caribbean lanternshark, Etmopterus hillianus 105 NORTH AMERICAN SHARKS 11 Great lanternshark, Etmopterusprinceps 107 Fringefin lanternshark, Etmopterus schultzi 110 SPECIES ACCOUNTS 19 Green lanternshark, Etmopterus virens 112 Family Chlamydoselachidae, The Frill Shark 21 Family Somniosidae, The Sleeper Sharks 115 Frill shark, Chlamydoselachus anguineus 22 Portuguese shark, Centroscymnus coelolepis 117 Roughskin dogfish, Centroscymnus owstoni 120 Family Hexanchidae, The Cowsharks 26 Velvet dogfish, Zameus squamulosus \T1 Sharpnose sevengill, or perlon shark, Heptranchias Greenland shark, Somniosus microcephalus 124 perlo 28 Pacific sleeper
    [Show full text]
  • Sharksof Oregon
    Sharksof Oregon Illustrations by Michael Cole oceanscape.aquarium.org Basking Shark Cetorhinus maximus These are one of the largest fish in the world, second only to their aptly-named cousin, the Whale Shark. Basking Sharks are very unusual-looking, with large heads that are almost completely encircled by gills. As their name implies, they are often found “basking” near the water’s surface, filtering krill and other zooplankton through their gaping mouths. The gills of the shark are lined with cartilaginous structures called “rakers” which help snag and hold food as they sweep through the water. Aside from their great size and large mouths, Basking Sharks can also be identified by a a hook-shaped snout and a large dorsal fin that can flop from one side to the other when out of the water. Due to their size and shape, they are often mistaken for Great White Sharks although they are more docile in temperament and do not pose any threat to human beings. Range and Habitat: The Basking Shark can be found in both the northern and southern hemispheres, from the subarctic and subantarctic waters to temperate waters along the continental shelves. Because the sharks follow the ocean’s current, they often migrate over vast distances. Although they spend most of their time in the open ocean, they will venture closer to shore, sometimes even entering bays, as food sources change. Status of Conservation: Changes in ocean currents and weather may be encouraging unusual numbers of Basking Sharks to more Southern latitudes, rather than the Canadian waters where they are usually spotted.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Workshop on Deep-Sea Species Identification, Rome, 2–4 December 2009
    FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) ISSN 2070-6987 Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 Cover photo: An aggregation of the hexactinellid sponge Poliopogon amadou at the Great Meteor seamount, Northeast Atlantic. Courtesy of the Task Group for Maritime Affairs, Estrutura de Missão para os Assuntos do Mar – Portugal. Copies of FAO publications can be requested from: Sales and Marketing Group Office of Knowledge Exchange, Research and Extension Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations E-mail: [email protected] Fax: +39 06 57053360 Web site: www.fao.org/icatalog/inter-e.htm FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report No. 947 FIRF/R947 (En) Report of the WORKSHOP ON DEEP-SEA SPECIES IDENTIFICATION Rome, Italy, 2–4 December 2009 FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2011 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this Information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary
    Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series ONMS-13-05 The Natural Resources of Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary: A Focus on Federal Waters Final Report June 2013 U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of National Marine Sanctuaries June 2013 About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Ocean Service (NOS) administers the Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (ONMS). Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the sanctuary system. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series facilitates integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate.
    [Show full text]
  • Cephalurus Cephalus Were Dissected, the Diameter of All Visible Oocytes Were Recorded, and and Parmaturus Xaniurus Embryos Were Removed
    219 Notes on the biology of Cephalurus cephalus were dissected, the diameter of all visible oocytes were recorded, and and Parmaturus xaniurus embryos were removed. For the sub- (Chondrichthyes: Scyliorhinidae) from sequent analysis of C. cephalus, pre- viously published data were also the west coast of Baja California Sur, México used. The length-weight relation- ship was determined with STATIS- Eduardo F. Balart TICA software (StatSoft, Inc., 1995) División de Biología Marina, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, S.C. by using the exponential function of Apdo. Postal 128, La Paz, B.C.S., México 23000 the form E-mail address: [email protected] W = aTLb, Jeanette González-García as used by Cross (1988) for the file- tail catshark. Length-weight rela- Carlos Villavicencio-Garayzar tionships were compared between Laboratorio de Elasmobranquios, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur Apdo. Postal 19-B, La Paz, B.C.S., México 23000 males and females by using an analysis of covariance. Results and discussion The head, or lollipop, shark (Cephal- The objective of this study was to Seventy-five catsharks were ob- urus cephalus) and filetail catshark provide additional data on the biol- tained: 51 P. xaniurus and 24 C. (Parmaturus xaniurus) are found in ogy of C. cephalus and P. xaniurus, cephalus. The latter species is the eastern Pacific in waters rang- with information on length-weight recorded for the first time along ing from 245 to 828 m and from 91 to relationships, and notes on repro- the west coast of the Baja Cali- 1251 m depth, respectively (Castro, ductive biology, including the sizes fornia peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Meeting of the Scientific Committee SC5-DW09 Rev1
    5th Meeting of the Scientific Committee Shanghai, China, 23 - 28 September 2017 SC5-DW09_rev1 Ecosystem approach considerations: Deepwater chondrichthyans (sharks, rays and chimaeras) in the Western SPRFMO Area Clinton Duffy1, Shane Geange1 & Tiffany Bock2 1 Department of Conservation 2 Ministry for Primary Industries 1 23 Aug 2017 SC5-DW09_rev1 1. Purpose of paper This paper provides a characterisation of the catch of chondrichthyans in New Zealand bottom fisheries in the SPRFMO Area and information on potential risks to deepwater chondrichthyan species from SPRFMO bottom fishing. Chondrichthyans, particularly those which predominantly occur or complete most of their lifecycle below 200 m depth, are known to have life history characteristics which make them especially vulnerable to fishing pressure. 2. Background About half of chondrichthyans are considered deepwater species, of which around half are sharks (predominantly squaloid dogfishes, Order Squaliformes, and catsharks, Order Carcharhiniformes, Families Pentanchidae and Scyliorhinidae)), with the remainder being skates (predominantly Arhynchobatidae, Rajidae, and Anacanthobatidae), and holocephalans (Kyne & Simpfendorfer 2007). There are currently 177 species reported from the SPRFMO Area that are known to regularly occur below 200 m depth (Appendix 1). Chondrichthyans generally exhibit relatively slow growth rates, late age at maturity, low fecundity and low natural mortality. Knowledge of the growth and reproductive parameters of most deepwater species is generally poor or completely lacking. For the limited number of deepwater species for which sufficient life history data is available, their estimated intrinsic rebound potential values (i.e., ability of a species to recover from fishing pressure) fall at the lower end of the chondrichthyan productivity scale, and include the lowest levels observed (Kyne & Simpfendorfer 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC), 2002-2007
    Highly migratory shark fisheries research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC), 2002-2007 Item Type monograph Authors Hueter, Robert E.; Cailliet, Gregor M.; Ebert, David A.; Musick, John A.; Burgess, George H. Publisher Mote Marine Laboratory Download date 04/10/2021 20:20:49 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/31121 HIGHLY MIGRATORY SHARK FISHERIES RESEARCH BY THE NATIONAL SHARK RESEARCH CONSORTIUM 2002-2007 FIVE-YEAR TECHNICAL REPORT TO NOAA/NMFS MOTE MARINE LABORATORY MOSS LANDING MARINE LABORATORIES VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA MOTE MARINE LABORATORY TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1241 NOAA PROJECT TECHNICAL REPORT Award Number: NA16FL2813 Amount of Award: $ 8,118,351 Project Title: Highly Migratory Shark Fisheries Research by the National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC), 2002-2007 Award Recipient: Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida Award Distributed to: Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida Moss Landing Marine Laboratories, Moss Landing, California Virginia Institute of Marine Science, Gloucester Point, Virginia University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Award Period: July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2007 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The National Shark Research Consortium (NSRC) is a scientific collaboration comprising four leading shark research organizations in the U.S.: the Center for Shark Research (CSR) at Mote Marine Laboratory (MML), Sarasota, Florida; the Pacific Shark Research Center (PSCR) at Moss Landing Marine Laboratories (MLML), Moss Landing, California; the Shark Research Program (SRP) at the Virginia Institute of Marine Science (VIMS), Gloucester Point, Virginia; and the Florida Program for Shark Research (FPSR) at the University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History (UF/FMNH), Gainesville, Florida. Consortium projects involve NOAA/NMFS-related research and educational activities required for assessing the status of shark stocks, managing U.S.
    [Show full text]