DOCSLIB.ORG

Swedish National Threat Assessment on Fentanyl Analogues and Other Synthetic Opioids

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Swedish National Threat Assessment on Fentanyl Analogues and Other Synthetic Opioids Swedish National Threat Assessment on fentanyl analogues and other synthetic opioids National Operations Department Contents Contents Summary ........................................................................................4 Recommendations ................................................................... 36 Definitions .....................................................................................6 Amendment to the Postal Act concerning the obligation of secrecy ........................................................ 36 Introduction ..................................................................................7 New sections of law ................................................................ 36 Aim ...............................................................................................8 Revision/relaxation of the Swedish Public Access Delimitations................................................................................8 to Information and Secrecy Act, providing the History ............................................................................................9 police with increased possibilities to disclose information to the Social Services concerning Current legislation ................................................................... 10 suspected users ........................................................................ 37 Legal status ................................................................................ 11 Needs ......................................................................................... 38 Classification ............................................................................. 11 Appendix .................................................................................... 40 Threat to society ...................................................................... 15 The prevalence of fentanyl and fentanyl analogues Deaths ....................................................................................... 15 in post-mortem cases ............................................................. 40 Other risks ................................................................................. 17 Statistics of seizures ................................................................. 42 National picture........................................................................ 19 Controlled fentanyls and fentanyl analogues in Sweden 10.04.2018............................................................ 43 The market ................................................................................ 19 Strategic analysis ...................................................................... 25 Actors ........................................................................................ 26 Measures taken ........................................................................ 30 Conclusions ................................................................................ 32 3 Swedish National Threat Assessment on fentanyl analogues and other synthetic opioids Summary The fentanyl epidemic has been affecting Sweden powder form directly from the supplier by Swedish since 2015. Since April 2015, 369 individuals have actors and are put on the market through Swedish died1, most of them men in the ages 25–38. The web sites and subsequently distributed through youngest victim is a three-year-old girl. This develop- Post Nord, the national postal service. This is how ment has prompted a special effort against the phe- the postal packages containing drugs reach the end nomenon at the Intelligence Division of the National customer. In the majority of cases, the substances are Operations Department of the Swedish Police taken at home, in solitude. In most cases, the sub- Authority (the NOA Intelligence Division) and is also stances have been produced legally, as they have not what prompts the need for this national picture. been classified as narcotic substances in the producer Even if the prevalence of fentanyl analogues and country. They are typically unregulated according the number of users are marginal, the situation is to Swedish legislation when introduced into the assessed to be the most serious development to date Swedish drug market. Once a substance has been in the Swedish drug market. It is estimated that one classified, the producers make minor changes to the in ten users die as a result of intoxication, and in structure to obtain a new chemical compound which October 2017, a higher number of individuals died of can then be sold legally. This presents a challenge to fentanyl toxicity than in road traffic. In addition, the law enforcement authorities. In many countries there fentanyl group (including the analogues) has sur- is no relevant/adapted legal basis and when the drug passed heroin as the most lethal substance. Fentanyl legislation is not applicable, an alternative legislation analogues are generally extremely potent (up to 4 000 is required in order to restrict trade. times as potent as pure heroin) and pose a danger also In Sweden, the sale of fentanyl analogues takes to individuals other than the users. Handling fentanyl place almost exclusively on the internet. The most analogues or brief exposure to the substances may frequent type of marketing consists of nasal spray pose a life-threatening danger to other individuals in bottles, which risks attracting new opioid users. The proximity to the user. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug The prevalence of fentanyl analogues in Sweden is, Addiction (EMCDDA)2 notes that fentanyl and to a large extent, dependent on international devel- other types of synthetic opioids have the potential opments. Like other new (novel) psychoactive sub- of becoming attractive commodities for organised stances (NPS), including synthetic opioids, fentanyl crime in Europe in the same way as in North Ameri- analogues are produced in powder form in China ca. Thousands of intoxicating doses can be manufac- and are distributed to Europe. They are ordered in tured out of small amounts of fentanyl, which makes it easier to conceal smuggling and avoid detection as 1 Data from the National Board of Forensic Medicine refer to compared to traditional drugs such as heroin. There the time period 2015 – March 2018. These figures refer to the is to date no evidence of street-level drug-trade in number of post-mortem cases where fentanyl and fentanyl fentanyl in Sweden or of heroin mixed with fentanyl. analogues have been deter-mined, alone or in combination with other substances, to be the cause of death. Taking into account only the fentanyl analogues, the number of deaths 2 EMCDDA (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and is 212. Drug Addiction). 4 Summary There is, however, a certain likelihood that the drug- examined for the first time in Sweden. The outcome trade will take on this same aspect in Sweden as well. of a district court was a conviction for eight counts of There has also been an extensive increase in illegal aggravated manslaughter. The decision of the higher trade in narcotics for medical use in Sweden. If the court will have a bearing on future forms of trade in user group using various types of opioids increases, fentanyl analogues in Sweden. Overall, experience there is a risk that the demand for fentanyl and its show that the measures taken to date have contribut- analogues will increase as well. What is particularly ed to limiting the availability of the substances. The alarming is the development involving counterfeit police see opportunities to further limit the trade. pharmaceutical products containing fentanyl However, there are no legal instruments with which analogues. Users who think they are using e.g. benzo- to take measures against the trade in the often lethal diazepine (tranquilliser) are in fact taking substances fentanyl analogues. The report, therefore, makes a which may pose an immediate danger to life and number of recommendations directed at the Ministry health. of Justice related to legislative changes or to the need Drug-trade actors supplying fentanyl analogues in for revised interpretations of existing legislation. Sweden are currently few in number. The profits are The future development of fentanyl analogues in substantial and business is conducted systematical- Sweden needs to be closely monitored and assessed ly within a legal structure where the substances are in relation to a possible change of the legal situation, marketed as research chemicals. So far, the trade has the ongoing targeted work and priorities of public been made up mainly of a domestic market involving authorities and to international developments. This Swedish actors, but a likely development would be a police effort requires a high degree of international shift in trade flows where trade takes place in inter- cooperation as the market for synthetic opioids, national market places. The limited number of including fentanyl, tends to be growing in Europe. Swedish vendors means that a small number of actors Clusters of deaths will be a recurring feature on the are behind a very large number of deaths. Currently, Swedish drug-market and will continue to present a there is an ongoing legal case where the offence challenge for the police and cooperating authorities. ”aggravated involuntary manslaughter” is being 5 Swedish National Threat Assessment on fentanyl analogues and other synthetic opioids Definitions Below you will find the definitions of recurring New (novel) psychoactive substances (NPS) The term concepts
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Swedish Code of Statutes
    1. ------IND- 2018 0506 S-- EN- ------ 20190508 --- --- FINAL Swedish Code of Statutes Ordinance amending the Ordinance (1999:58) banning certain products SFS 2018:1587 that are harmful to health Published Issued on 4 October 2018 on 9 October 2018 The Government hereby lays down1 that the annex to the Ordinance (1999:58) prohibiting certain products that are harmful to health shall read as set out below. ___________ This ordinance shall enter into force on 12 November 2018. On behalf of the government ANNIKA STRANDHÄLL Kjell Rempler (Ministry of Health and Social Affairs) 1 See Directive (EU) 2015/1535 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services. 2 Annex SFS 2018:1587 List of products to be regarded as products that are harmful to health in accordance with the Ordinance prohibiting certain products that are harmful to health N-methyl-1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-butylamine (MBDB) 1-(3,4-methylenedioxyphenyl)-2-butylamine (BDB) 5-methoxy-N,N-dimethyltryptamine (5-MeO-DMT) 5-methoxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (5-MeO-DiPT) 5-methoxy-alphamethyltryptamine (5-MeO-AMT) 2,5-dimethoxy-4-ethylphenethylamine (2C-E) alpha-methyltryptamine (AMT) 2,5-dimethoxy-4-chlorophenethylamine (2C-C) 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenethylamine (2C-D) 4-acetoxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (4-AcO-DiPT) 4-hydroxy-N,N-diisopropyltryptamine (4-HO-DiPT) gamma-butyrolactone (GBL) 1,4-butanediol (1,4-BD) 4-acetoxy-N,N-methylisopropyltryptamine
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Radiation Sources and Security of Radioactive Materials
    Safety of Radiation Sources and Security of Radioactive Materials PROCEEDINGS OF A CONFERENCE, 'DIJON, FRANCE, 14-18 SEPTEMBER 1998 JOINTLY ORGANIZED BY THE IAEA, THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, INTERPOL AND THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION SAFETY OF RADIATION SOURCES AND SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS © IAEA, 1999 Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtained by writing to the International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Strasse 5, P.O. Box 100, A-1400 Vienna, Austria. Printed by the IAEA in Austria June 1999 PROCEEDINGS SERIES SAFETY OF RADIATION SOURCES AND SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS PROCEEDINGS OF AN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THE SAFETY OF RADIATION SOURCES AND THE SECURITY OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS JOINTLY ORGANIZED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL POLICE ORGANIZATION-INTERPOL AND THE WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATON, AND HELD IN DIJON, FRANCE, 14-18 SEPTEMBER 1998 INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA, 1999 EDITORIAL NOTE The Proceedings have been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader's assistance. The views expressed remain, however, the responsibility of the named authors or participants. In addition, the views are not necessarily those of the governments of the nominating Member States or of the nominating organizations. Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use. The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies
    Border Management Reform in Transition Democracies Editors Aditya Batara G Beni Sukadis Contributors Pierre Aepli Colonel Rudito A.A. Banyu Perwita, PhD Zoltán Nagy Lieutenant-Colonel János Hegedűs First Edition, June 2007 Layout Front Cover Lebanese-Israeli Borders Downloaded from: www.michaelcotten.com Printed by Copyright DCAF & LESPERSSI, 2007 The Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces FOREWORD Suripto, SH Vice Chairman of 3rd Commission, Indonesian House of Representatives And Chariman of Lesperssi Founder Board Border issues have been one of the largest areas of concern for Indonesia. Since becoming a sovereign state 61 years ago, Indonesia is still facing a series of territorial border problems. Up until today, Indonesia has reached agreements with its neighbouring countries related to demarcation and state border delineation. However, the lack of an unequivocal authority for border management has left serious implications for the state’s sovereignty and its citizen’s security. The Indonesian border of today, is still having to deal with border crime, which includes the violation of the territorial border, smuggling and terrorist infiltration, illegal fishing, illegal logging and Human Rights violations. These kinds of violations have also made a serious impact on the state’s sovereignty and citizen’s security. As of today, Indonesia still has an ‘un-settled’ sea territory, with regard to the rights of sovereignty (Additional Zone, Economic Exclusive Zone, and continent plate). This frequently provokes conflict between the authorised sea-territory officer on patrol and foreign ships or fishermen from neighbouring countries. One of the principal border problems is the Sipadan-Ligitan dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia, which started in 1969.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and Its Analogues in Biological Specimens
    Recommended methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Recommended Methods for the Identification and Analysis of Fentanyl and its Analogues in Biological Specimens MANUAL FOR USE BY NATIONAL DRUG ANALYSIS LABORATORIES UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2017 Note Operating and experimental conditions are reproduced from the original reference materials, including unpublished methods, validated and used in selected national laboratories as per the list of references. A number of alternative conditions and substitution of named commercial products may provide comparable results in many cases. However, any modification has to be validated before it is integrated into laboratory routines. ST/NAR/53 Original language: English © United Nations, November 2017. All rights reserved. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorse- ment of the United Nations. This publication has not been formally edited. Publishing production: English, Publishing and Library Section, United Nations Office at Vienna. Acknowledgements The Laboratory and Scientific Section of the UNODC (LSS, headed by Dr. Justice Tettey) wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to Dr. Barry Logan, Center for Forensic Science Research and Education, at the Fredric Rieders Family Founda- tion and NMS Labs, United States; Amanda L.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, Their Parts, Components and Ammunition To, from and Across the European Union
    Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT 1 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Illicit Trafficking in Firearms, their Parts, Components and Ammunition to, from and across the European Union REGIONAL ANALYSIS REPORT UNITED NATIONS Vienna, 2020 © United Nations, 2020. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copy- right holder, provided acknowledgment of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any written output that uses this publication as a source at [email protected]. DISCLAIMERS This report was not formally edited. The contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of UNODC, nor do they imply any endorsement. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issuance. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website. This document was produced with the financial support of the European Union. The views expressed herein can in no way be taken to reflect
    [Show full text]
  • UNODC, Synthetic Drugs in East and Southeast Asia
    Synthetic Drugs in East and Southeast Asia Latest developments and challenges May 2020 Global SMART Programme Copyright © 2020, United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNODC would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by the Global Synthetic Monitoring: Analyses, Reporting and Trends (SMART) Programme, Laboratory and Scientific Section with the support of the UNODC Regional Office for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Supervision, direction and review Justice Tettey, Chief, Laboratory and Scientific Section Jeremy Douglas, Regional Representative, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Research and drafting Martin Raithelhuber, Illicit Synthetic Drugs Expert Tun Nay Soe, Inter-regional Programme Coordinator Inshik Sim, Drug Programme Analyst, Southeast Asia and the Pacific Joey Yang Yi Tan, Junior Professional Officer in Drug Research Graphic design and layout Akara Umapornsakula, Graphic Designer Administrative support Jatupat Buasipreeda, Programme Assistant The present report also benefited from the expertise and valuable contributions of UNODC colleagues in the Laboratory and Scientific Section and the Regional Office for Southeast Asia and the Pacific, including Tsegahiwot Abebe Belachew, Rebecca Miller, Reiner Pungs, and John Wojcik. Disclaimer This report has not been formally edited. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNODC or the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • WHO Expert Committee on Drug Dependence
    WHO Technical Report Series 1034 This report presents the recommendations of the forty-third Expert Committee on Drug Dependence (ECDD). The ECDD is responsible for the assessment of psychoactive substances for possible scheduling under the International Drug Control Conventions. The ECDD reviews the therapeutic usefulness, the liability for abuse and dependence, and the public health and social harm of each substance. The ECDD advises the Director-General of WHO to reschedule or to amend the scheduling status of a substance. The Director-General will, as appropriate, communicate the recommendations to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, who will in turn communicate the advice to the Commission on Narcotic Drugs. This report summarizes the findings of the forty-third meeting at which the Committee reviewed 11 psychoactive substances: – 5-Methoxy-N,N-diallyltryptamine (5-MeO-DALT) WHO Expert Committee – 3-Fluorophenmetrazine (3-FPM) – 3-Methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) on Drug Dependence – Diphenidine – 2-Methoxydiphenidine (2-MeO-DIPHENIDINE) Forty-third report – Isotonitazene – MDMB-4en-PINACA – CUMYL-PEGACLONE – Flubromazolam – Clonazolam – Diclazepam The report also contains the critical review documents that informed recommendations made by the ECDD regarding international control of those substances. The World Health Organization was established in 1948 as a specialized agency of the United Nations serving as the directing and coordinating authority for international health matters and public health. One of WHO’s constitutional functions is to provide objective, reliable information and advice in the field of human health, a responsibility that it fulfils in part through its extensive programme of publications. The Organization seeks through its publications to support national health strategies and address the most pressing public health concerns of populations around the world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Decade of Implementing the United Nations Programme of Action on Small Arms and Light Weapons
    UNIDIR A Decade of Implementing the United Nations Programme of Action of A Decade of Implementing the United Nations Programme This report analyses the national reports on implementation of the 2001 United Nations Programme of Action on Small Arms submitted by states from the date of its adoption to 31 December 2012. It provides an overview A Decade of Implementing of reporting trends and in-depth review of states’ implementation of the national-level commitments contained in the Programme of Action the United Nations Programme and the International Tracing Instrument, adopted by Member States in 2005: National Coordination Agencies and National Points of Contact, manufacturing, marking, record-keeping, tracing, international transfers of Action on Small Arms (including export, import, transit and other commitments), brokering, stockpile management, surplus, public awareness and confidence-building, and other themes addressed in the PoA. and Light Weapons This analysis is part of a joint project of UNIDIR and the Small Arms Survey, established to assist states to better fulfil their commitments under the Programme of Action. It gives an overview of implementation efforts so Analysis of National Reports SMALL far and highlights gaps in implementation. The report is designed to help states prepare for the Second Review Conference in August 2012, and ARMS identify priority areas for consideration and focused attention in the next SURVEY review cycle. UNITED NATIONS INSTITUTE FOR DISARMAMENT RESEARCH Sarah Parker and Katherine Green UNITED
    [Show full text]
  • Facts & Figures Swedish Government Offices Yearbook 2012
    SE-103 33 Stockholm, SwedenSE-103 www.government.se Production: Information Rosenbad, Government Offices of Sweden • Illustrations: Sara-Mara/Söderberg Agentur • Print: Elanders, Stockholm, September, 2013 – Swedish Government Offices of Sweden Yearbook Sweden of Offices Government Swedish – 2012 Figures and Facts – Swedish Government Offices Yearbook Offices Government Swedish – Facts and Figures 2012 Facts & Figures Swedish Government Offices Yearbook 2012 The Swedish Government Offices Yearbook 2012 was produced by the Office for Administrative Affairs and Blomquist Annonsbyrå AB. The English edition of the yearbook 2012 is an abridged version of the Swedish edition. Production: Information Rosenbad, Government Offices of Sweden, and Blomquist Annonsbyrå AB, September 2013. Cover illustration: Sara-Mara/Söderberg Agentur Preface The Government Offices of Sweden is a politically controlled agency, where the Government determines the direction of operations and the issues to be given priority. The role of the Government Offices is to assist the Government in its task of governing the realm and achieving its policy objectives. The purpose of the yearbook is to present facts and figures about the organisation, responsibilities and activities of the Government Offices focusing on the following areas of operation: • The legislative process • The budget process and agency management • Administrative business • International cooperation • External communication • Internal development. The statistical information presented in this publication is based on data from December 2012. The yearbook also contains information about the ministers who served in the Swedish Government in 2012 and a section on sources of information and useful contacts at the Government Offices. If you have any questions that are not answered in these pages or would like more information, please feel free to contact us.
    [Show full text]
  • Anniversary Publication
    Ten Years of Europol 1999-2009 TEN YEARS OF EUROPOL, 1999-2009 Europol Corporate Communications P.O. Box 90850 2509 LW The Hague The Netherlands www.europol.europa.eu © European Police OfÞ ce, 2009 All rights reserved. Reproduction in any form or by any means is allowed only with the prior permission of Europol Editor: Agnieszka Biegaj Text: Andy Brown Photographs: Europol (Zoran Lesic, Bo Pallavicini, Max Schmits, Marcin Skowronek, Europol archives); EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities; European Commission; European Council; Participants of the Europol Photo Competition 2009: Kristian Berlin, Devid Camerlynck, Janusz Gajdas, Jean-François Guiot, Lasse Iversen, Robert Kralj, Tomasz Kurczynski, Antte Lauhamaa, Florin Lazau, Andrzej Mitura, Peter Pobeska, Pawel Ostaszewski, Jorgen Steen, Georges Vandezande Special thanks to all the photographers, EU Member States’ Law Enforcement Authorities and Europol Liaison Bureaux for their contributions 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 7 I. Birth of an Idea, 1991-1998 11 1. Ideas behind Europol: Tackling International Crime 11 2. Maastricht Treaty: the ‘Founding Article’ 12 3. First Step: the Europol Drugs Unit 12 4. The Hague: a Fitting Location 13 5. Formal Status: the Europol Convention 14 6. European Union: New Members and a New Treaty 15 II. The First Years, 1999-2004 21 1. Facing the Challenges: Stabilisation and Consolidation 21 2. Changing Priorities, Flexible Organisation 24 3. Information Exchange and Intelligence Analysis: Core Business 27 4. The Hague Programme: Positioning Europol at the Centre of EU Law Enforcement Cooperation 34 5. Casting the Net Wider: Cooperation Agreements with Third States and Organisations 36 6. Europol’s Most Important Asset: the Staff and the ELO Network 37 III.
    [Show full text]
  • Visa Policy As Migration Channel
    Visa Policy as Migration Channel produced by the European Migration Network October 2012 This Synthesis Report summarises the main findings of the National Reports for the EMN Study on Visa Policy as Migration Channel undertaken by EMN National Contact Points from 21 Member States (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Sweden, United Kingdom). The overall purpose of this study was to analyse the possible nexus between visa policy and migration management, examining the effects of visa policy on the management of migration, both in terms of facilitating legal migration and preventing irregular migration. The study covers the period from 2004 up to 2011 with statistics provided up to the end of 2010. The Synthesis Report, as well as the National Reports upon which this synthesis is based, are available from http://www.emn.europa.eu under "EMN Studies." Several of the National Reports are available in the Member States’ national language, as well as in English. EMN Synthesis Report – Visa Policy as Migration Channel CONTENTS Disclaimer .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Explanatory Note .............................................................................................................................................. 4 Executive Summary.........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TESTIMONY of CASEY OWEN DURST Director of Field Operations
    TESTIMONY OF CASEY OWEN DURST Director of Field Operations Baltimore Field Office Office of Field Operations U.S. Customs and Border Protection Department of Homeland Security For a Hearing BEFORE U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency ON “Combating Opioid Smuggling” June 19, 2018 Harrisburg, Pennsylvania Introduction Chairman Perry, Ranking Member Correa, and distinguished Members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear today to discuss the role of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) in combating the flow of opioids, including synthetic opioids such as fentanyl, into the United States. The opioid crisis is one of the most important, complex, and difficult challenges our Nation faces today, and was declared a National Emergency by President Donald Trump in October of last year.1 As America’s unified border agency, CBP plays a critical role in preventing illicit narcotics, including opioids, from reaching the American public. CBP leverages targeting and intelligence- driven strategies, and works in close coordination with our partners as part of our multi-layered, risk-based approach to enhance the security of our borders and our country. This layered approach reduces our reliance on any single point or program, and extends our zone of security outward, ensuring our physical border is not the first or last line of defense, but one of many. Opioid Trends, Interdictions, and Challenges In Fiscal Year (FY) 2018 to-date, the efforts of Office of Field Operations (OFO) and U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) personnel resulted in the seizure of more than 545,000 lbs.
    [Show full text]