DOCSLIB.ORG

Rinne's and Weber's Test

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rinne's and Weber's Test RINNE’S AND WEBER’S TEST “The Sea Shell”, oil on canvas, William Bouguereau, 1871 RINNE’S AND WEBER’S TEST Introduction Rinne’s and Weber’s tests are simple tests that can be done to determine the presence of a hearing deficit. The nature of a hearing deficit refers to whether the problem is conductive or sensorineural. Both tests must be done to indicate the nature of hearing loss, however formal audiometry by a qualified audiometrist remains the best test for hearing loss. Conductive deafness is caused by an abnormality of the external or middle ear. Sensorineural deafness is caused by an abnormality of the inner ear, (ie the cochlear or the auditory nerve). See appendix 1 below for anatomy of the outer, middle and inner ear. Mixed deafness is a term used to describe a combination of conduction and sensorineural deafness in the same ear. Rinne’s Test ● A 512 Hz tuning fork is struck then placed on the mastoid process behind the (deaf) ear and when the sound is no longer heard it is placed in line with the external meatus. 1 (Note that 256 Hz and 128 Hz tunings forks are used for testing vibration sense, but are not suitable for the testing of hearing). ● Normally the note is audible at the external meatus. If a patient has nerve deafness the note is audible at the external meatus, as air and bone conduction are reduced equally, so that air conduction is better (as is normal). This is termed Rinne positive, (a normal result). ● If there is a conduction (middle or outer ear) deafness no note is audible at the external meatus. This is termed Rinne negative, (an abnormal result). Alternative methods: It should be noted that the Rinne’s test can be performed in a number of different ways. 2 Two further alternatives are: ● The tuning fork is struck and held close to the patient’s ear. It is then placed firmly on the mastoid process and the patient is simply asked to state whether it is heard better by bone conduction or air conduction. ● A more accurate, but more time consuming method of performing the Rinne test is to hold the tuning fork close to the patient’s ear and ask him to say when he can no longer hear it. It is then placed on the mastoid process and the patient states whether or not he/she can still hear it. If he cannot, air conduction (AC) is better than bone conduction (BC). If on the other hand the tuning fork can still be heard by bone conduction, then BC is better than AC Rinne’s test tells you little or nothing about cochlear function, it is primarily a test of outer/middle ear function. Be aware that the Rinne Test alone cannot reliably identify a sensorineural hearing loss. The Weber tuning fork test is essential to make this diagnosis. Weber’s Test ● A 512 Hz tuning fork is struck then placed on the centre of the forehead. Normally the sound will be perceived in the centre of the forehead. ● Nerve deafness causes the sound to be perceived in the normal ear only. ● A patient with conduction deafness will perceive the sound to be louder in the abnormal ear. If the tuning fork pressed to the middle of the forehead is heard in the good ear, and not in the deaf one, the patient has a sensorineural hearing loss until proven otherwise. Application and Interpretation Normal results: Tuning fork tests showing a positive Rinne in each ear and the Weber test referred equally to each ear, indicating symmetrical hearing in both ears with normal middle/outer ear function. Sensorineural deafness in the right ear: The Rinne test is positive on both sides and the Weber test is referred to the left ear. Conductive deafness in the right ear: The Rinne test is negative on the right (ie patient’s right) positive on the left and the Weber test is referred to the right ear. Appendix 1 Anatomy of the ear Anatomy of the outer, middle and inner ear. The 3 ear bones, (left to right) include the malleus, incus and stapes. References 1. Talley NJ, O’Connor S, Clinical Examination, 3rd ed, 1996: p. 361. 2. Bull PD, Lecture Notes of the Ear, Nose and Throat, 7th ed 1991. Dr J. Hayes Reviewed September 2012 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HEENT EXAMINIATION ______HEENT Exam Exam Overview
    HEENT EXAMINIATION ____________________________________________________________ HEENT Exam Exam Overview I. Head A. Visual inspection B. Palpation of scalp II. Eyes A. Visual Acuity B. Visual Fields C. Extraocular Movements/Near Response D. Inspection of sclera & conjunctiva E. Pupils F. Ophthalmoscopy III. Ears A. External Inspection B. Otoscopy C. Hearing Acuity D. Weber/Rinne IV. Nose A. External Inspection B. Speculum/otoscope C. Sinus areas V. Throat/Mouth A. Mouth Examination B. Pharynx Examination C. Bimanual Palpation VI. Neck A. Lymph nodes B. Thyroid gland 29 HEENT EXAMINIATION ____________________________________________________________ HEENT Terms Acuity – (ehk-yu-eh-tee) sharpness, clearness, and distinctness of perception or vision. Accommodation - adjustment, especially of the eye for seeing objects at various distances. Miosis – (mi-o-siss) constriction of the pupil of the eye, resulting from a normal response to an increase in light or caused by certain drugs or pathological conditions. Conjunctiva – (kon-junk-ti-veh) the mucous membrane lining the inner surfaces of the eyelids and anterior part of the sclera. Sclera – (sklehr-eh) the tough fibrous tunic forming the outer envelope of the eye and covering all of the eyeball except the cornea. Cornea – (kor-nee-eh) clear, bowl-shaped structure at the front of the eye. It is located in front of the colored part of the eye (iris). The cornea lets light into the eye and partially focuses it. Glaucoma – (glaw-ko-ma) any of a group of eye diseases characterized by abnormally high intraocular fluid pressure, damaged optic disk, hardening of the eyeball, and partial to complete loss of vision. Conductive hearing loss - a hearing impairment of the outer or middle ear, which is due to abnormalities or damage within the conductive pathways leading to the inner ear.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE REPORT 48-Year-Old Man
    THE PATIENT CASE REPORT 48-year-old man SIGNS & SYMPTOMS – Acute hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness in the left ear Dennerd Ovando, MD; J. Walter Kutz, MD; Weber test lateralized to the – Sergio Huerta, MD right ear Department of Surgery (Drs. Ovando and Huerta) – Positive Rinne test and and Department of normal tympanometry Otolaryngology (Dr. Kutz), UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas; VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas (Dr. Huerta) Sergio.Huerta@ THE CASE UTSouthwestern.edu The authors reported no A healthy 48-year-old man presented to our otolaryngology clinic with a 2-hour history of potential conflict of interest hearing loss, tinnitus, and fullness in the left ear. He denied any vertigo, nausea, vomiting, relevant to this article. otalgia, or otorrhea. He had noticed signs of a possible upper respiratory infection, including a sore throat and headache, the day before his symptoms started. His medical history was unremarkable. He denied any history of otologic surgery, trauma, or vision problems, and he was not taking any medications. The patient was afebrile on physical examination with a heart rate of 48 beats/min and blood pressure of 117/68 mm Hg. A Weber test performed using a 512-Hz tuning fork lateral- ized to the right ear. A Rinne test showed air conduction was louder than bone conduction in the affected left ear—a normal finding. Tympanometry and otoscopic examination showed the bilateral tympanic membranes were normal. THE DIAGNOSIS Pure tone audiometry showed severe sensorineural hearing loss in the left ear and a poor speech discrimination score. The Weber test confirmed the hearing loss was sensorineu- ral and not conductive, ruling out a middle ear effusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Bates' Pocket Guide to Physical Examination and History Taking
    Lynn S. Bickley, MD, FACP Clinical Professor of Internal Medicine School of Medicine University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico Peter G. Szilagyi, MD, MPH Professor of Pediatrics Chief, Division of General Pediatrics University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry Rochester, New York Acquisitions Editor: Elizabeth Nieginski/Susan Rhyner Product Manager: Annette Ferran Editorial Assistant: Ashley Fischer Design Coordinator: Joan Wendt Art Director, Illustration: Brett MacNaughton Manufacturing Coordinator: Karin Duffield Indexer: Angie Allen Prepress Vendor: Aptara, Inc. 7th Edition Copyright © 2013 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2009 by Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 2007, 2004, 2000 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Copyright © 1995, 1991 by J. B. Lippincott Company. All rights reserved. This book is protected by copyright. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including as photocopies or scanned-in or other electronic copies, or utilized by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the copyright owner, except for brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. Materials appear- ing in this book prepared by individuals as part of their official duties as U.S. government employees are not covered by the above-mentioned copyright. To request permission, please contact Lippincott Williams & Wilkins at Two Commerce Square, 2001 Market Street, Philadelphia PA 19103, via email at [email protected] or via website at lww.com (products and services). 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Printed in China Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Bickley, Lynn S. Bates’ pocket guide to physical examination and history taking / Lynn S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hearing Screening Training Manual REVISED 12/2018
    Hearing Screening Training Manual REVISED 12/2018 Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) Community and Family Health Division Maternal and Child Health Section 1 2 For more information, contact Minnesota Department of Health Maternal Child Health Section 85 E 7th Place St. Paul, MN 55164-0882 651-201-3760 [email protected] www.health.state.mn.us Upon request, this material will be made available in an alternative format such as large print, Braille or audio recording. 3 Revisions made to this manual are based on: Guidelines for Hearing Screening After the Newborn Period to Kindergarten Age http://www.improveehdi.org/mn/library/files/afternewbornperiodguidelines.pdf American Academy of Audiology, Childhood Screening Guidelines http://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/hearingloss/documents/AAA_Childhood%20Hearing%2 0Guidelines_2011.pdf American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Hearing Assessment in Children: Recommendations Beyond Neonatal Screening http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/124/4/1252 4 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 7 Audience ..................................................................................................................... 7 Purpose ....................................................................................................................... 7 Overview of hearing and hearing loss ............................................................................ 9 Sound, hearing, and hearing
    [Show full text]
  • Current Audiometric Tests for the Detection of Functional Hearing Loss
    CURRENT AUDIOMETRIC TESTS FOR THE DETECTION OF FUNCTIONAL HEARING LOSS by JOAN PHYLLIS COOPER X^^ Be A., Union College, 1965 A MASTER'S REPORT submitted in partial fulfillment of the J requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of Speech KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1963 Approved by: Ma j or ? ro re s s or . bo 11 C6£ TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I , Introduction .••••••••••••••••••«••• • • • 1 Definitions ....?................«« •••••••• 2 II. Tests for Functional Hearing Loss 4 General Behavior in the Clinical Evaluation 4 The Ear, Nose, and Throat Examination 9 Pure-tone Audiometry 12 Saucer-shaped Audiograms 14 False-alarm Responses During Pure-tone Audiometry ...................... c 17 Inappropriate Lateralization ,« 17 Bone Conduction Audiometry 20 Speech Audiometry ••••••••••••••••• • 22 Speech Discrimination ••••••••••• 22 Speech Reception Threshold ........ ............... 23 Errors During Measurement of Spondee Threshold ... 2 3 Inappropriate Lateralization 26 Pure-tone Stenger Test 26 Modified (Speech) Stenger Test 29 Doerf ler-Stewart Test 30 Lombard Test ............ o 36 De layed Auditory Feedback ., 39 Psychogalvanic Skin Resistance Test 45 Modification of EDR Test , . .. 50 Bekesy Type V Tracing ......... o ..... ....... ... s ...... 51 c ^ . iii Chapter Page ( II. Rainville Test 5S Sensorineural Acuity Level Test ..... 59 Lipreading Test .....«•..•.<.«•......,....•............ 61 The Variable Intensity Pulse Count Method 62 Rapid Random Loudness Judgments ..................... c 63 Middle Ear
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    Index Page numbers in italics denote fi gures, anion gap 263 Baker’s cyst 100, 104 those in bold denote tables. ankle swelling 195–8 bamboo spine 189 ankle-brachial pressure index 70–1 basal cell carcinoma 77 abdominal aortic aneurysm 145 ankylosing spondylitis 179, 189 basic life support 282–5 abdominal distension 143–7, 145 antalgic gait 25, 42, 94 Behçet’s disease 181 abdominal examination 10–19 anti-tuberculosis drugs 223 benign paroxysmal positional vertigo abdominal masses 17–18, 17 antiepileptics 223 173 abdominal pain 137–42 antihypertensives 223 benign prostatic hypertrophy 57 acute 138 anxiety berry aneurysm 33 chronic 139 faintness 175 biceps tendonitis 81 investigations 139–40 palpitations 120 bleeding diathesis 149 origin of 140–1, 141 tremor 169 blood gas analysis see arterial blood gas abducens nerve 34 aortic dissection 116 analysis abscess 193 aortic regurgitation 3 Boerhaave’s syndrome 149 breast 54 aortic stenosis 3 Bouchard’s nodes 90 perianal 57 aorto-enteric fi stula 149 bowel cancer see colorectal cancer acidosis apex beat 4 bowel obstruction 144, 146 metabolic 263, 265 Apley’s test 102 brachial plexus 85 respiratory 264 apologising 237 brain natriuretic peptide 6 acoustic neuroma 34, 175 appendicectomy 218 breaking bad news 208–10 acquired immunodefi ciency syndrome apraxic gait 25 SPIKES framework 209 see HIV/AIDS arterial blood gas analysis 262–6, 264–5 breast abscess 54 acromioclavicular joint arterial examination 68–72 breast examination 53–5 arthritis 81 arterial ulcer 70 description of lumps 55, 55 Scarf test
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Care Assessment of Suspected Stroke-TIA Pathway
    Primary Care Assessment of Rapid onset of new neurological deficit or symptom Suspected Stroke/TIA Rapid means over seconds or minutes, or rarely, hours Exclude/ treat Click for hypoglycaemia more info Perform face, arm, speech test (FAST) • Has the person’s face fallen on one side? Can they smile? • Can they raise both arms and keep them there? • Is their speech slurred? FAST positive FAST negative See pathway Negative, but history Primary Care Risk of FAST positive now Stratification of Suspected resolved TIA Upper or Lower Motor Neurone Sparing of the forehead, and possibly maintenance of spontaneous smiling = UMN Quick assessment Facial nerve weakness lesion. Lower Motor Neurone Leg weakness YES for other neurological only? Whole of one side affected, including the facial weakness forehead = LMN lesion. This could be caused by a deficit brainstem stroke in which case it would be Diplopia squint 3rd, 4th, accompanied by other signs such as tremor, 6th ataxia, vertigo and horizontal gaze palsy Weakness 11th of Rapid onset of other shoulder elevation, NO Upper Motor Neurone motor symptoms or Other cranial nerves ninging of scapula, (sparing of forehead) signs weakness of head turning See pathway Deviation of tongue or Management of uvula 12th nerve Suspected Stroke Numbness or altered Exclude peripheral nerve sensation or dermatomal pattern Rapid onset sensory Click for more symptoms or signs info Sensory inattention Comprehension difficulties may be for the spoken or written word or for both or for one language only Speech difficulties
    [Show full text]
  • Examples of Questions for the Exam
    MedIS exam 2013 Course title: Nervesystemet og bevægeapparatet II - MedIS Programme: Bachelor in education Semester: 5. semester Exam date: 21-1-12 Time: 9:00 - 12:00 Evaluation form 7-point scale – External censur Important information: Remember to bring your student identification card Remember to put your student number – not your name and cpr no – on all sheets that you hand in for evaluation Remember to hand in the assignment if you leave the exam before it has ended No written aid is allowed Quicktionary pen is allowed Your paper must be handed in on paper in hand written form The study board/the university cannot be held liable if any problems should occur regarding the electronic aid during the examination It will be considered cheating or attempting to cheat if the technical equipment of the student is communicating or trying to communicate with other equipment not relevant to the exam, without an explicit permission. Before the beginning of the exam, the student should make sure that all communication devices in the equipment at the exam are turned off. Communication is not allowed The exam consists of a mixture of multiple choice questions and essay questions. The total amount of questions is 36. The total amount of points is 60. This lists the grades corresponding to the points: 12 (passed): 56-60 points 10 (passed): 51-55.5 points 07 (passed): 46-50.5 points 04 (passed): 41-45.5 points 02 (passed): 36-40.5 points 00 (failed): 18-35.5 points -2 (failed): 0-17.5 points 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vestibular Neuritis, Labyrinthitis, and a Few Comments Regarding Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss Marcello Cherchi
    Vestibular neuritis, labyrinthitis, and a few comments regarding sudden sensorineural hearing loss Marcello Cherchi §1: What are these diseases, how are they related, and what is their cause? §1.1: What is vestibular neuritis? Vestibular neuritis, also called vestibular neuronitis, was originally described by Margaret Ruth Dix and Charles Skinner Hallpike in 1952 (Dix and Hallpike 1952). It is currently suspected to be an inflammatory-mediated insult (damage) to the balance-related nerve (vestibular nerve) between the ear and the brain that manifests with abrupt-onset, severe dizziness that lasts days to weeks, and occasionally recurs. Although vestibular neuritis is usually regarded as a process affecting the vestibular nerve itself, damage restricted to the vestibule (balance components of the inner ear) would manifest clinically in a similar way, and might be termed “vestibulitis,” although that term is seldom applied (Izraeli, Rachmel et al. 1989). Thus, distinguishing between “vestibular neuritis” (inflammation of the vestibular nerve) and “vestibulitis” (inflammation of the balance-related components of the inner ear) would be difficult. §1.2: What is labyrinthitis? Labyrinthitis is currently suspected to be due to an inflammatory-mediated insult (damage) to both the “hearing component” (the cochlea) and the “balance component” (the semicircular canals and otolith organs) of the inner ear (labyrinth) itself. Labyrinthitis is sometimes also termed “vertigo with sudden hearing loss” (Pogson, Taylor et al. 2016, Kim, Choi et al. 2018) – and we will discuss sudden hearing loss further in a moment. Labyrinthitis usually manifests with severe dizziness (similar to vestibular neuritis) accompanied by ear symptoms on one side (typically hearing loss and tinnitus).
    [Show full text]
  • Bedside Neuro-Otological Examination and Interpretation of Commonly
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 on 24 November 2004. Downloaded from BEDSIDE NEURO-OTOLOGICAL EXAMINATION AND INTERPRETATION iv32 OF COMMONLY USED INVESTIGATIONS RDavies J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75(Suppl IV):iv32–iv44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.054478 he assessment of the patient with a neuro-otological problem is not a complex task if approached in a logical manner. It is best addressed by taking a comprehensive history, by a Tphysical examination that is directed towards detecting abnormalities of eye movements and abnormalities of gait, and also towards identifying any associated otological or neurological problems. This examination needs to be mindful of the factors that can compromise the value of the signs elicited, and the range of investigative techniques available. The majority of patients that present with neuro-otological symptoms do not have a space occupying lesion and the over reliance on imaging techniques is likely to miss more common conditions, such as benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), or the failure to compensate following an acute unilateral labyrinthine event. The role of the neuro-otologist is to identify the site of the lesion, gather information that may lead to an aetiological diagnosis, and from there, to formulate a management plan. c BACKGROUND Balance is maintained through the integration at the brainstem level of information from the vestibular end organs, and the visual and proprioceptive sensory modalities. This processing takes place in the vestibular nuclei, with modulating influences from higher centres including the cerebellum, the extrapyramidal system, the cerebral cortex, and the contiguous reticular formation (fig 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Sudden Sensoryneural Hearing Loss As a Rare Attack Type in Multiple Sclerosis
    380 Arch Neuropsychiatry 2018;55:380−382 LETTER TO EDITOR https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2017.19270 Sudden Sensoryneural Hearing Loss As a Rare Attack Type in Multiple Sclerosis Amber EKER1 , Bahar KAYMAKAMZADE1 , Aslı TUNCER KURNE2 , Çağrı Mesut TEMUÇİN2 , Rana KARABUDAK2 1Department of Neurology, Near East University Faculty of Medicine, Nicasia, Cyprus 2Department of Neurology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey ultiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, multifocal, inflammatory, A 35-year-old male patient who had been following with MS was Mdemyelinating disorder of the central nervous system. In addition admitted to hospital with the complaint of acute hearing loss. He had to common symptoms like optic neuritis (ON), sensorial, pyramidal, diagnosed with definite MS two years ago. The presenting symptom was and cerebellar dysfunction, a wide range of rare symptoms could be a left sided weakness, and hypoesthesia on the left upper extremity. At feature of MS. Rare symptoms could be the presenting symptom of MS. that time, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed Herein, we report a case with MS with a very rare symptom; unilateral demyelinating lesions in periventricular white matter, corpus callosum vestibulocochlear nerve involvement and aimed to emphasize the and left capsula interna. Cervical MRI showed C3-C4 intramedullary importance of electrophysiological studies in the diagnosis. demyelinating plaque. None of the lesions had contrast enhancement. (a) Figure 1. a, b. T2 (a) and contrast enhanced T1 (b) sequences of the brain MRI does not (b) reveal any new lesion. Cite this article as: Eker A, Kaymakamzade B, Tuncer Kurne A, Temuçin ÇM, Karabudak R.
    [Show full text]
  • Sudden Bilateral Simultaneous Deafness with Vertigo As a Sole Manifestation of Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency H Lee, H a Yi, R W Baloh
    539 J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry: first published as 10.1136/jnnp.74.4.539 on 1 April 2003. Downloaded from SHORT REPORT Sudden bilateral simultaneous deafness with vertigo as a sole manifestation of vertebrobasilar insufficiency H Lee, H A Yi, R W Baloh ............................................................................................................................. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:539–541 CASE REPORT A 68 year old woman presented with bilateral sudden A 68 year old woman with long standing non-insulin depend- simultaneous hearing loss and transient spontaneous ent diabetes mellitus and hypertension suddenly developed vertigo as a sole manifestation of vertebrobasilar vertigo, vomiting, and bilateral tinnitus. Five minutes later, insufficiency. Extensive investigation to exclude other she noticed bilateral hearing loss. She had difficulty hearing causes was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging her husband speak. She did not have dysarthria, numbness, of the brain, including diffusion images, showed no abnor- weakness, visual distortion, or incoordination. The hearing malities. A magnetic resonance angiogram showed severe loss persisted, but vertigo resolved over a few hours. Two days stenosis of the middle third of the basilar artery. A pure previously, she had had two episodes of transient vertigo and tone audiogram showed moderate sensorineural-type hearing loss involving the left ear that lasted no more than a hearing loss bilaterally. The localisation and mechanism of few minutes without any accompanying neurological symp- an isolated cochleovestibular dysfunction are discussed. toms. The patient had no previous history of hearing difficulty. There was no prior history of temporal bone fracture, menin- gitis, autoimmune disease, or exposure to ototoxic drugs. On admission, she had persistent bilateral hearing loss and ertebrobasilar insufficiency (VBI) can cause sudden non-specific dizziness with lightheadedness.
    [Show full text]