A Commentary on the Book of by Harry
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Machiavelli's Public Conspiracies
MediaTropes eJournal Vol II, No 1 (2009): 60–83 ISSN 1913-6005 MACHIAVELLI’S PUBLIC CONSPIRACIES JAMES MARTEL When it comes to his treatment of political conspiracies, Machiavelli can seem indifferent to whether his advice serves princes or subjects, or both. In the beginning of his chapter “Of Conspiracies” in the Discourses, he writes: It seems to me proper now to treat of conspiracies, being a matter of so much danger both to princes and subjects; for history teaches us that many more princes have lost their lives and their states by conspiracies than by open war. But few can venture to make open war upon their sovereign, whilst every one may engage in conspiracies against him. On the other hand, subjects cannot undertake more perilous and foolhardy enterprises than conspiracies, which are in every respect more difficult and dangerous; and thence it is that, although so often attempted, yet they so rarely attain the desired object. And therefore, so that princes may learn to guard against such dangers, and that subjects may less rashly engage in them, and learn rather to live contentedly under such a government as Fate may have assigned to them … I shall treat the subject at length, and endeavor not to omit any point that may be useful to the one or the other. 1 1 Niccolò Machiavelli, The Prince and the Discourses (New York: The Modern Library, 1950), p. 410. Cited henceforth as either The Prince or The Discourses. All translations from this edition, although at times I supply the Italian when it is useful. -
Machiavelli's La Umana Commedia
Akira Murata: Machiavelli’s La Umana Commedia Political Philosophy No.24 Machiavelli’s La Umana Commedia: key thoughts on understanding his major political works Akira Murata* Abstract: This paper clarifies the originality of Machiavelli’s political philosophy, explaining Th e P rince and Discourses on Livy in the context of his comedies Mandragola and Clizia. Tw o comedies are characterized by the optimistic vision of human affairs, i.e., the vision of human comedy (umana commedia). The vision of human comedy expressed in Machiavelli’s comedies is based on two principles: the first is the consideration of motion or change as superior to standstill, and the second involves the idea that new things trump old things – that is, youth triumphs over the aged. The vision incorporates the optimistic belief that, relying on these principles, a happy grand finale can be achieved in this world, solely through human free w ill (libero arbitrio). The p o lit ical philosophy of Machiavelli took on matchless originality by injecting the prospect of human comedy into the gravest subjects of the public sphere. 1. The originality of Machiavelli Adequate comprehension of Machiavelli’s comedies Mandragola and Clizia underlies a proper grasp of the originality behind his political philosophy. Researchers have made efforts to explain the originality of Machiavelli, i.e., his departure from the traditions of classical antiquity and Biblical religion, as observed in The Prince and Discourses on Livy (Berlin, 1979, pp. 33 – 49). However, these efforts have often been thwarted by the fact that Machiavelli regarded himself not only as the founder of “new modes and orders” (modi ed ordini nuovi) but also as an optimal follower o f the tradition of classical antiquity (D., I, proemio [I, pp. -
Niccolò Machiavelli. a Paradoxical Success
Niccolò Machiavelli. A Paradoxical Success Robert Black Niccolò Machiavelli (1469-1527) is history’s most startling and influential political commentator. The Prince is the world’s most famous (and infamous) work of political theory. 1 The Discourses on Livy are the cornerstone of modern republican thought. 2 Mandragola is the greatest play written in the Italian language.3 The Florentine Histories constituted the first successful neo- classical humanist history in Italian rather than Latin.4 In Machiavelli’s day, Aristotle was the most famous political thinker; in our time, it is Machiavelli.5 In the sixteenth century, more than two hundred printed editions of his writings were published, a further hundred in the next century, and in the eighteenth more than a hundred and seventy.6 Just as today Freud and Marx are universal common currency, so was Machiavelli during the Renaissance.7 In the first century after his death he had his advocates (for example Jean Bodin, who ‘praised him as an exemplary reader of history’,8 and Francis Bacon, who argued ‘that Machiavelli proposed a new intellectual instrument or weapon well adapted to (...) politics’9) but for the most part he was known as the wicked ‘Machiavel’, the godless champion of evil. 10 Machiavelli’s champions praised his realistic vision of politics, whereas his critics condemned his amoral separation of politics from ethics. 1 Niccolò Machiavelli, Il principe, G. Inglese ed. (Turin 2013). 2 Niccolò Machiavelli, Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio, F. Bausi ed. (Rome 2001). 3 Niccolò Machiavelli, La Mandragola. Storia e filologia, P. -
The Question of Esoteric Writing in Machiavelli's Works
The Question of Esoteric Writing in Machiavelli’s Works rasoul namazi Leo Strauss Center, University of Chicago The question addressed by this article is whether esotericism or secret teachings exist in Machiavelli’s writings. This question has been a major point of contention between the commentators of Machiavelli, with many denying the existence of esoteric teaching in the Machiavellian corpus. This article will explore the controversy by studying Machiavelli’s own works, and on this basis it will be contended that there are many references and elements present in Machiavelli’s works that justify an esoteric interpretation. Consequently, it is reasonable to assume that Machiavelli has esoteric intentions that are different from the surface meaning of his texts. It is therefore necessary for commentators to go beyond the surface of his writings to uncover his deeper teachings. Cet article se penche sur la question de la présence d’éléments ésotériques ou d’enseignements secrets dans l’œuvre de Machiavel. Le sujet est un point de désaccord important parmi les commentateurs de l’œuvre de Machiavel, puisque plusieurs nient l’existence d’un tel enseignement. L'article explore cette controverse en examinant l’œuvre de Machiavel, pour ensuite montrer qu’il s’y trouve plusieurs références et éléments justifiant une interprétation ésotérique. En conséquence, il est vraisemblable que Machiavel ait eu des intentions ésotériques différentes du propos apparent de ses écrits. Il s’avère donc nécessaire que les commentateurs aillent plus loin que la surface de son œuvre afin de découvrir ses enseignements cachés. ny commentator who begins the study of Niccolò Machiavelli will be Asurprised by the number of works written on his thought. -
The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli Edited by John M
Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-67846-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli Edited by John M. Najemy Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to machiavelli Niccolò Machiavelli (1469–1527) is the most famous and controversial figure in the history of political thought and one of the iconic names of the Renaissance. The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli brings together sixteen original essays by leading experts, covering his life, his career in Florentine government, his reaction to the dramatic changes that affected Florence and Italy in his lifetime, and the most prominent themes of his thought, including the founding, evolution, and corruption of republics and principalities, class conflict, liberty, arms, reli- gion, ethics, rhetoric, gender, and the Renaissance dialogue with antiquity. In his own time Machiavelli was recognized as an original thinker who provocatively challenged conventional wisdom. With penetrating analyses of The Prince, Discourses on Livy, Art of War, Florentine Histories, and his plays and poetry, this book offers a vivid portrait of this extraordinary thinker as well as assess- ments of his place in Western thought since the Renaissance. john m. najemy is Professor of History at Cornell University. His previous work includes Corporatism and Consensus in Florentine Electoral Politics, 1280– 1400 (1982), Between Friends: Discourses of Power and Desire in the Machiavelli–Vettori Letters of 1513–1515 (1993), A History of Florence, 1200–1575 (2006) and essays on Machiavelli and Renaissance political thought. A complete list of books in the series is at the back of this book © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-67846-9 - The Cambridge Companion to Machiavelli Edited by John M. -
POLITICAL REALISM in APOCALYPTIC TIMES a Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in P
POLITICAL REALISM IN APOCALYPTIC TIMES A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy By Alison Elizabeth Jennifer McQueen January 2012 © 2012 Alison Elizabeth Jennifer McQueen POLITICAL REALISM IN APOCALYPTIC TIMES Alison Elizabeth Jennifer McQueen, Ph. D. Cornell University 2012 This dissertation traces the responses of three canonical political realists—Niccolò Machiavelli, Thomas Hobbes, and Hans Morgenthau—to eruptions of apocalyptic rhetoric, imagery, and politics. I treat apocalypticism as a very particular kind of utopianism that is premised on a belief in the imminent end of the known world and the arrival of a radically new future. Contemporary realists tend to position their pragmatic approaches to politics against ‘utopian’ alternatives, which they reject for being at best unrealizable and at worst profoundly dangerous. However, in tracing the historical engagement between political realism and apocalypticism, I find a more complex and productive relationship. Through an historical and textual analysis of the work of Machiavelli, Hobbes, and Morgenthau, I argue that much of the nuance and texture in these realists’ work, and particularly their evolving conceptions of human nature and their commitments to political action, emerge from serious and extended engagements with apocalypticism. ii BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH Alison McQueen was born in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. She completed her secondary education at the Linden School in Toronto. She received her BA (with distinction) in International Development from the University of Guelph in 2003, her MA in Political Science and International Relations from the University of Toronto in 2005, and her PhD in Government from Cornell University in 2012. -
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO the Recovery of Virtù
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO The Recovery of Virtù: Imitation and Political Practices in the Works of Niccolò Machiavelli A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction for the requirements of the degree Doctor in Philosophy in Political Science by Aaron Cotkin Committee in Charge: Professor Tracy B Strong, Chair Professor Harvey Goldman, Co-Chair Professor Fonna Forman Professor Marcel Hénaff Professor Peter Stacey 2017 Copyright Aaron Cotkin, 2017 All rights reserved The Dissertation of Aaron Cotkin is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication on microfilm and electronically: _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________ Co-Chair _____________________________________________________________________ Chair University of California, San Diego 2017 iii DEDICATION This is dedicated to my father, Spencer Cotkin, in recognition of his constant support, encouragement, and enthusiasm for my academic pursuits. Thank you, Dad! iv EPIGRAPH How different practice is from theory! Many are those who understand things well, who either do not remember them or do not know how to put them into action! And they who do that, their intelligence is useless; because it is like having a treasure stored in an ark with the obligation that it can never be taken out. Francesco Guicciardini v TABLE OF CONTENTS Signature Page………………………………………………………………………...iii Dedication……………………………………………………………………………..iv -
“Vox Populi”: Machiavelli, Opinione, and the Popolo, from Il Principe to the Istorie Fiorentine”*
“Vox Populi”: Machiavelli, Opinione, and the Popolo, from Il Principe to the Istorie Fiorentine”* Albert Russell Ascoli Ma quanto alla prudenzia ed alla stabilità, dico, come un popolo è più prudente, più stabile e di migliore giudizio che un principe. E non sanza cagione si assomiglia la voce d'un popolo a quella di Dio: perché si vede una opinione universale fare effetti maravigliosi ne' pronostichi suoi; talché pare che per occulta virtù ei prevegga il suo male ed il suo bene. (Discorsi I.58)1 In a famous passage from the dedicatory letter to the Principe, which we will analyze in detail shortly, Machiavelli paradoxically authorizes himself as an expert concerning the high and the mighty by claiming to speak with “the voice of the people.” On the face of it the Principe contains one lesson after another in how a “virtuous” leader can manipulate and control the populace to his own ends. On the other hand, from shortly after the composition of the treatise, readers have asserted that Machiavelli is secretly, ironically, allegorically, expressing opinions that place him on the side of the “popolo” against the repressive regimes of such as Cesare Borgia and Julius II. Rather than taking sides in this still unresolved, and perhaps unresolvable, debate, I will argue here that the Principe, in the letter to Lorenzo and throughout, delineates the problematic nature of Machiavelli’s relationship to the “people”—and with it the unstable contours of his “subject position” as opinionated commentator on politics and history—posing questions which will continue to haunt his writings from the near contemporary Discorsi to his final masterpiece, the Istorie Fiorentine. -
Poetics and Politics
Poetics and Politics Unauthenticated Download Date | 9/7/18 2:19 PM Unauthenticated Download Date | 9/7/18 2:19 PM Poetics and Politics Net Structures and Agencies in Early Modern Drama Edited by Toni Bernhart, Jaša Drnovšek, Sven Thorsten Kilian, Joachim Küpper, Jan Mosch Unauthenticated Download Date | 9/7/18 2:19 PM This book is published in cooperation with the project DramaNet, funded by the European Research Council ISBN 978-3-11-053665-2 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-053669-0 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-060352-1 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License. For details go to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Control Number: 2018017860 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2018 Toni Bernhart, Jaša Drnovšek, Sven Thorsten Kilian, Joachim Küpper, Jan Mosch, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston Typesetting: Meta Systems Publishing & Printservices GmbH, Wustermark Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck Cover illustration: photodeedooo/iStock/Thinkstock www.degruyter.com Unauthenticated Download Date | 9/7/18 2:19 PM Acknowledgements This book is a collection of papers presented at an international conference at Freie Universität Berlin on 29–30 April 2015. Bringing together experts of early modern drama and music, the event was a wonderful example of transnational and interdisciplinary collaboration in the academy. We would like to thank everybody who participated for the insightful talks and stimulating discussions. -
The Machiavellian Reformation. an Essay in Political Theory Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä 2006, 171 P
JYVÄSKYLÄ STUDIES IN EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY AND SOCIAL RESEARCH 290 Paul-Erik Korvela The Machiavellian Reformation An Essay in Political Theory JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Copyright © , by University of Jyväskylä ABSTRACT Korvela, Paul-Erik The Machiavellian Reformation. An Essay in Political Theory Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä 2006, 171 p. (Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social Research ISSN 0075-4625; 290) ISBN 951-39-2666-4 Diss. The study explores Niccolò Machiavelli’s (1469-1527) views on Christianity. The question of Machiavelli’s relation to religion in general and to Christianity in particular has aroused much discussion. Most commonly he is seen as some sort of neo-Pagan aiming to paganise rather than secularise or reform Christianity. In previous research, his opposition to Christianity often has been assumed but seldom clarified. The view that Machiavelli was simply an advocate of paganism against Christianity is inaccurate. Machiavelli criticised Christianity, but this does not mean that he was an anti- Christian or an anti-religious thinker. He thought that religion should be used like the ancients used it, but he does not demand that the religion in question should be the same as the ancients had. Thus, he was not attempting any kind of resurrection of paganism. As is commonly known, Machiavelli harked back to ancient Rome and its practices. The same methods were not used in his time, he thought, because Christianity had already carved men into its liking and made them effeminate and contemplative rather than virtuous and active. But Machiavelli did not claim that it would be better for a society to get rid of religion altogether.