Samuel Johnson and Thomas Jefferson: Their Contradictory Lockean Responses to the Legality of the American Revolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Samuel Johnson and Thomas Jefferson: Their Contradictory Lockean Responses to the Legality of the American Revolution Bridgewater State University Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Honors Program Theses and Projects Undergraduate Honors Program 5-19-2019 Samuel Johnson and Thomas Jefferson: Their Contradictory Lockean Responses to the Legality of the American Revolution Joshua Wright Bridgewater State University Follow this and additional works at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Joshua. (2019). Samuel Johnson and Thomas Jefferson: Their Contradictory Lockean Responses to the Legality of the American Revolution. In BSU Honors Program Theses and Projects. Item 406. Available at: https://vc.bridgew.edu/honors_proj/406 Copyright © 2019 Joshua Wright This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. Samuel Johnson and Thomas Jefferson: Their Contradictory Lockean Responses to the Legality of the American Revolution Joshua Wright Submitted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Departmental Honors in English Bridgewater State University May 9, 2019 Dr. Thomas Curley, Thesis Advisor Dr. Jordon Barkalow, Committee Member Dr. Lee Torda, Committee Member Wright 1 John Locke and his Second Treatise of Government (1690), had a major intellectual impact on political controversies surrounding the American Revolution. Although later historians tended to focus on proponents of the American Revolution from the American perspective like Thomas Jefferson, noteworthy opponents of colonial rebellion like Samuel Johnson had very much the same admiration for John Locke’s seminal ideas regarding human equality and individual liberty. An examination of the contrary perspectives on Locke and revolution taken by both of these writers sheds crucial light on conflicting legal assumptions surrounding the creation of the United States. Both writers were scholars of John Locke and understood the concepts Locke outlined in his Second Treatise, by utilizing Locke’s arguments in support of their own, either for separation from England (Jefferson) or for allegiance to the mother country (Johnson). By recourse to two primary texts, Taxation No Tyranny (1775) by Samuel Johnson, and the Declaration of Independence (1776) by Thomas Jefferson, I aim in this thesis to investigate the fundamental ideological positions of both writers, and how they make use of different Lockean arguments to support their contrasting viewpoints on the legality of the American Revolution. Samuel Johnson and Jefferson both shared an admiration for Locke’s concepts of inalienable rights regarding life, liberty, and property. With regard to property and ownership, Samuel Johnson criticized the American colonists for robbing Native Americans of their land and, therefore, violating their fundamental Lockean right to original ownership in a state of nature. Johnson believed in the fundamental legal priority of native inhabitants anywhere in the world because of their original occupation of land. From John Locke’s Second Treatise, Johnson derives his ideology toward original dominion. According to Locke’s ideas about property in a state of nature, ownership exists in an equality of sharing, and possession of anything by an individual is his or her own right of ownership: “nobody has originally a private dominion Wright 2 exclusive of the rest of mankind in any of them, as they are thus in their natural state” (Locke, 17). As Locke maintains, “[the] fruit or venison that nourishes the wild Indian, who knows no enclosure…must be his…that another can no longer have any right to it” (Locke, 17). In the Lockean state of nature, an individual has an innate right to freedom and property, and so the “wild Indian” has dominion over his native land and resources. Samuel Johnson’s landmark Dictionary of the English Language (1755) even cites Locke’s Second Treatise directly to illustrate the meaning of the word dominion: “He could not have private dominion over that which was under the private dominion of another.” The only means by which one could forfeit his right to property is by means of consent. Consent was usually missing in the colonial takeover of native land, and Johnson therefore rightly viewed the imperialistic colonization of North America by Englishmen and Frenchmen as outright robbery of indigenous people. According to Johnson, once the state of nature ceased to exist, the Americans are justified in their utilization of the land under British rule because they obtained plots of land through land grants from the crown. Because American colonists were still loyal British subjects, they came to have a longstanding prescriptive right to American land under British law, which over time, by way of the historical practicality of long- term dominion, replaced the original aboriginal claim by Native Americans. Although the original theft of aboriginal land was unjustified, as time progressed, British civilization spread further into the American wilderness under English law and governance, and hence warranted the mother country’s possession and regulation of American colonies. Johnson’s allegiance to ideas about original dominion in defense of Native Americans also included a Lockean faith in universal human equality. In fact, Johnson’s hatred of slavery, especially of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, is based on a Lockean principle of an innate, Wright 3 universal human equality. According to James Boswell’s biography, The Life of Samuel Johnson (1791), Johnson in 1777 detailed his condemnation of slavery in a legal brief written for the freeing of a black British slave, Joseph Knight, and Johnson’s words are direct derivatives of Locke’s Second Treatise. He writes: It must be agreed that in most ages many countries have had part of their inhabitants in a state of slavery; yet it may be doubted whether slavery can ever be supposed the natural condition of men. It is impossible not to conceive that men in their original state were equal; and very difficult to imagine how one would be subjected to another but by violent compulsion…No man is by nature the property of another (Johnson qtd. by Boswell, pp. 202-203). Johnson suggests that the only means by which one is put into a state of slavery, is not through consent but by force. This violates Locke’s leading assumption that man is “to have the law of nature as his rule…and not to be subject to the inconstant, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary will of another man” (Locke, 15). Arbitrary power that places a man under the dominion of another reduces him to a state of slavery, and violates his innate natural rights. Johnson’s legal brief echoes Lockean principles, in suggesting that Joseph Knight be freed due to Knight’s innate natural liberties and equality derived from a state of nature. In Taxation No Tyranny, Johnson even goes to the extent of criticizing the colonists’ hypocritical views of upholding Lockean principle about human equality while holding slaves. He states that “the slaves should be set free, an act which surely the lovers of liberty cannot but recommend” (Johnson, 130). Utilizing sarcasm, he condemns the colonists’ use of Lockean innate natural rights to protest taxation by the mother country while they blatantly are violating such principles as owners of slaves. Jefferson also affirms a Lockean belief in the same universal inalienable rights—life, liberty, and property (pursuit of happiness as expressed in the Declaration of Independence). However, the two writers fundamentally disagreed about Locke’s concept of the “state of Wright 4 nature.” Jefferson argues that Britain’s infringement of these rights bound originally in a state of nature, requires separation from the mother country, and imagines something like a return to the state of nature in order to erect a new government in the Declaration of Independence. Johnson is fundamentally against this argument because any abstract notion of an original state of nature, before the creation of human societies, must give way to historical reality of nations and governments with laws and conventions restricting while protecting individuals. Written a year prior to Jefferson’s Declaration, Taxation No Tyranny is obviously no direct response to Jefferson’s work, and Johnson possessed no knowledge of the arguments being formulated in Jefferson’s Declaration. Taxation No Tyranny is written in defense of the political status quo of England, and argues against the American colonies and their rebellious citizens, stressing that the “state of nature” that the Americans want to return to no longer exists. This is because English civil society has already evolved over centuries, replacing and nullifying any “state of nature.” In order for one to completely return to a Lockean “state of nature,” one must reject society, its comforts, luxuries, and its productions (including government), and opt for a non-existent primitive state. In Taxation No Tyranny, the stress is on a fully formed British mother country that is well beyond any theoretical state of nature. Johnson emphasizes the fundamentals of parliamentary sovereignty and British power over its territories and colonies as English law demands. The little known basis for Johnsons’ overarching stress on parliamentary sovereignty and colonial dependence under English law in his pamphlet, was found in law lectures that Johnson wrote in secret collaboration with Sir Robert Chambers in A Course of Lectures on the English Law (1766-1767). In these Lectures compiled by Thomas M. Curley in 1986 for Clarendon Press, Johnson states that “the [American] colonies are bound by all the statutes of the British Wright 5 legislature in which the colonies are particularly and generally named, I have already shown to be the opinion of most learned lawyers…” (Lectures, 290-292). Almost ten years before Taxation No Tyranny was written, Johnson was affirming, using the same language at times, that the colonies are bound by the decrees of the omnicompetent king-in-Parliament at Westminster, and are under its full jurisdiction. The consensus among British lawyers, backs Johnson’s claims.
Recommended publications
  • Samuel Johnson's Childhood Illnesses and the King's Evil
    SAMUEL JOHNSON'S CHILDHOOD ILLNESSES AND THE KING'S EVIL by LAWRENCE C. McHENRY, JR. AND RONALD MAC KEITH 'HERE is a brave boy,' proclaimed George Hector,* when he brought Samuel Johnson into the world. From this moment and throughout most of his childhood, young Sam was harassed by a variety of afflictions that troubled his daily existence, but did not prevent him from eventually becoming one of England's outstanding literary figures. Samuel Johnson's adult illnesses and the history of his childhood have been described by many writers, but no separate work is available on his childhood medical history. The purpose ofthis paper is to describe Johnson's childhood medical disorders and their consequences. The principal source of information on this period in Johnson's life is from an autobiographical sketch, An account of the life of Dr. Samuel Johnson from his birth to his eleventh year, written by himself. Johnson apparently called this his 'Annals' and his two principal biographers, Boswell and Hawkins, did not know of its existence. This was written when he was 55 years old and was 'among the mass of papers which were ordered to be committed to the flames a few days before his death.'** Johnson's 'Annals' gives a record of his early affections, but it contains a rather questionable medical implication that has been perpetuated as fact. This is that Johnson developed tuberculosis during the first few weeks of his life. We propose to point out that this is unlikely and to show that it is much more probable that he developed tuberculosis later, when he was about two years old.
    [Show full text]
  • Democracy’ in Somerset and Beyond
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-89755-6 - Romanticism, Revolution and Language: The Fate of the Word from Samuel Johnson to George Eliot John Beer Excerpt More information chapter 1 ‘Democracy’ in Somerset and beyond The political impact of the French Revolution in England was strangely oblique, even when one remembers that it was largely being experienced at one remove. My concern here is not only with some examples of that oblique reaction but with language generally, and with the manner in which the growing questioning of authority during the period reflected a more profound alteration, taking place over a much longer period – a movement from what might be termed the language of fidelity to the cultivation of dialects that could be regarded as more critically oriented. To put the matter another way, whereas in medieval times writers had been so close to the religion of their surrounding culture that they did not need to think about the possible religious implications of their language, by the middle of the twentieth century, they would have become so self-conscious and self-critical that they could not write anything containing such implications and not be aware of possible commenting voices ranging from the harshly critical to the warmly favourable. The 1790s, I shall maintain, provided a crucial juncture for this development. In addition, however, attention may be drawn to recent emphases in the writing of history by which the possibility of concentrating on a small and particular detail and expanding one’s attention from there can be explored, or, alternately, one may begin by proceeding to the widest possible extreme and moving inward.
    [Show full text]
  • DOES the JEWISH PAST HAVE a FUTURE? by Sholome Michael Gelber 251
    CONTENTS EDITORS' PREFACE Ν THE HISTORIC QUEST BY JOSEPH L. BLAU VII BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE WRITINGS OF SALO WITTMAYER BARON XV THE CORRESPONDENCE OF TOBIAS BEN MOSES, THE KARAITE, OF CON- STANTINOPLE BY ZVI ANKORI 1 TOWARD THE DAWN OF HISTORY BY MEIR BEN-HORIN 39 THE MESSIANIC SELF-CONSCIOUSNESS OF ABRAHAM ABULAFIA: A TEN- TATIVE EVALUATION BY ABRAHAM BERGER 55 THE CLOAKMAKERS' STRIKE OF 1910 BY HYMAN BERMAN 63 TRADITION AND INNOVATION BY JOSEPH L. BLAU 95 FELIX LIBERTATE AND THE EMANCIPATION OF DUTCH JEWRY BY HERBERT I. BLOOM 105 AMERICAN JEWRY-REFLECTIONS ON SOCIAL, COMMUNAL, AND SPIRITUAL TRENDS BY SAMUEL M. BLUMENFIELD 123 MORALITY AND RELIGION IN THE THEOLOGY OF MAIMONIDES BY BEN Ζ ION BOKSER 139 AN AMERICAN JEW AT THE PARIS PEACE CONFERENCE OF 1919: EXCERPTS FROM THE DIARY OF OSCAR S. STRAUS BY NAOMI W. COHEN 159 THE LAFAYETTE COMMITTEE FOR JEWISH EMANCIPATION BY ABRAHAM G. DUKER 169 THE BACKGROUND OF THE BERLIN HASKALAH BY ISAAC EISENSTEIN- BARZILAY 183 ASPECTS OF THE JEWISH COMMUNAL CRISIS IN THE PERIOD OF THE NAZI REGIME IN GERMANY, AUSTRIA, AND CZECHOSLOVAKIA BY PHILIP FRIEDMAN 199 JEWISH IMMIGRANTS IN LONDON IN THE 1880's by Lloyd P. Gartner 231 XIV CONTENTS DOES THE JEWISH PAST HAVE A FUTURE? by Sholome Michael Gelber 251 AN AMERICAN ANTI-SEMITE IN THE NINETEENTH CENTURY BY LEONARD A. GREENBERG AND HAROLD J. JONAS 265 FLIGHT FROM THE SLUMS BY HYMAN B. GRINSTEIN 285 WELLHAUSEN'S INTERPRETATION OF ISRAEL'S RELIGIOUS HISTORY: A REAPPRAISAL OF HIS RULING IDEAS BY HERBERT F. HAHN 299 THE CONSERVATIVE RABBINATE: A SOCIOLOGICAL STUDY BY ARTHUR HERTZBERG 309 THE JEWISH ASSOCIATION IN AMERICA BY ISAAC LEVITATS 333 ON MARRIAGE IN ALALAKH BY ISAAC MENDELSOHN 351 DOCTOR SAMUEL JOHNSON'S GRAMMAR AND HEBREW PSALTER BY ISIDORE S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Times and Influence of Samuel Johnson
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI FILOZOFICKÁ FAKULTA Katedra anglistiky a amerikanistiky Martina Tesařová The Times and Influence of Samuel Johnson Bakalářská práce Studijní obor: Anglická filologie Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Ema Jelínková, Ph.D. OLOMOUC 2013 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci na téma „Doba a vliv Samuela Johnsona“ vypracovala samostatně a uvedla úplný seznam použité a citované literatury. V Olomouci dne 15.srpna 2013 …………………………………….. podpis Poděkování Ráda bych poděkovala Mgr. Emě Jelínkové, Ph.D. za její stále přítomný humor, velkou trpělivost, vstřícnost, cenné rady, zapůjčenou literaturu a ochotu vždy pomoci. Rovněž děkuji svému manželovi, Joe Shermanovi, za podporu a jazykovou korekturu. Johnson, to be sure, has a roughness in his manner, but no man alive has a more tender heart. —James Boswell Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 2. The Age of Johnson: A Time of Reason and Good Manners ......................... 3 3. Samuel Johnson Himself ................................................................................. 5 3.1. Life and Health ......................................................................................... 5 3.2. Works ..................................................................................................... 10 3.3. Johnson’s Club ....................................................................................... 18 3.4. Opinions and Practice ............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Johnson's Pragmatism and Imagination
    Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination By Stefka Ritchie Samuel Johnson’s Pragmatism and Imagination By Stefka Ritchie This book first published 2018 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2018 by Stefka Ritchie All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-1603-2 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-1603-8 A sketch of Samuel Johnson, after Joshua Reynold (circa 1769) By Svetlan Stefanov (2009) (http://www.phot4oart.com) CONTENTS List of Illustrations ................................................................................... viii Abstract ...................................................................................................... ix Preface ........................................................................................................ xi Acknowledgements .................................................................................. xiv Chronology: Samuel Johnson (1709-1784) ............................................... xv Abbreviations ......................................................................................... xviii Chapter One ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Johnson (1709-84)
    Samuel Johnson (1709-84) gsdfgsd Dr. Samuel Johnson • From his biography in the Norton 2841-2843: • Crowning achievement: his English Dictionary. • Famous style: ―The great generalist‖ • direct, memorable, and sometimes harsh (little patience for elaborate nonsense). • A famous talker, known for his conversation. • The subject of the most famous biography in English literature—Boswell’s Life of Johnson. 1729: Left Oxford—too poor. 1737-55: Tutoring and ―hack writing‖ in London for money. 1747-55: A Dictionary of the English Language (assisted). 1750-52: The Rambler (bi- weekly published essays). 1759: Rasselas (moral tales, written in one week). 1762: ―The Club‖—by now, an influential celebrity among artists, writers, intellectuals. 1763: Met Boswell (22), who recorded Johnson’s life. 1779-81: Lives of the Poets. Johnson wrote fast and worked hard. 18th C Writers’ Relations to the Reading Public • Back in the Renaissance, books were the property of the few; books were expensive, and their production (the author’s time and the costs to publish them) was often supported by a patron. • In the 18th C, there was a shift from the patron to the public. • Books became much cheaper to produce, and an expanding middle class would buy them. • Pope may have looked down on new reading public, but the new market of readers freed writers from the old model of patronage. • Reading brief works on contemporary arts & issues flourished. Periodicals emerged—not unlike like today’s weekly or monthly magazines. Today we have magazines like The New Yorker. • In the 18th C, instead of The New Yorker, there was The Spectator, The Idler, and The Rambler.
    [Show full text]
  • LECTURE NOTES: Dr
    English 232 (Spring 2006) LECTURE NOTES: Dr. Katherine Harris Pre-History of Romantic-Era Writers ! Politics of 18th C. " lose America (1776) " fascinated w/French democracy - devastated with overthrow of European/French democracy # Fall of Bastille (July 14, 1789); freed only 7 prisoners # sparked many debates regarding “revolution” * Thomas Paine’s Rights of Man * Burke’s A Philosophical Enquiry * Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Men - Napolean ruled until 1814 (dictator; anti-British) " attempt to abolish slave trade in Britain (very successful) - women head the movement " early feminist movement (Wollstonecraft, Baillie, Barbauld, Hays) - gives voice to women in a time when they had no power (political or economic) " shifting class system & economic theories because of Industrial Revolution & colonial expansion - naval force not to be paralleled until end of 19th C. - colonies include: India, W. Indies, Africa & N.America - rise of the middle class & urban centers ! Sciences of 18th & 19th C: " Chemistry: 1789, Lavosier pub. Elements of Chemistry (French) " Geology: Lyell, Principles of Geology (1830-33) - forces of geological change = permanent but gradual " Psychology: threat to mind, free will & soul - Locke = 17th & 18th C, mind governed by psychological laws equal to physical (Natural) laws " Organicism: Schlegel - change is inevitable; nature in constant state of becoming; power of mind needed to understand a world ! Literature of 18th C. " Dr. Samuel Johnson (d.1784) - began the modern dictionary (1755) " Swift & Pope both die 1745 (wrote satire, a ridiculing and publicly disruptive style) - they pushed a tradition of satirical writing which authors rejected in the 1790s " Publishing - copyright laws began to protect author’s works (1774) & pay them - periodicals came up every where and were cheap (easier to read than poetry/novels & shorter) - rise of consciously “British” Literature (“nationalism”) - writing sold directly to booksellers instead of patronage system " Marquis de Sade plays in 1780s ! Rise of the Novel in the 18th C.
    [Show full text]
  • BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: in Search of a Better World
    BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: In Search of a Better World TEACHER’S GUIDE d Benjamin Franklin: In Search of a Better World Gerald R. Ford Presidential Museum Teacher’sGrand Activity Rapids, MI Guide Benjamin Franklin: In Search ofSeptember a Better 2, 2011 World – January Teacher’s 8, 2012 Activity Guid The exhibit and print materials are made possible locally by the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Foundation, BenGeraldj R.amin Ford Presidential F Museum,ranklin: and the National In Archives S and Recordsearch Administration. of a Better World COVER: Portrait of Benjamin Franklin by Michael Deas LEFT: From The Whistle, produced by a More Perfect-Union for the Benjamin Franklin Tercentenary exhibition, with detail from portrait of Francis Folger Franklin attributed to Samuel Johnson; Private Collection. TEACHER’S GUIDE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN: In Search of a Better World CREATED BY: The Benjamin Franklin Tercentenary WRITTEN BY: Dana Devon Leslie Hubbard Allison McBride The Benjamin Franklin Tercentenary Teacher’s Guide was made possible by the generous support of the John Templeton Foundation and The Barra Foundation, Inc. ©2005 THE BENJAMIN FRANKLIN TERCENTENARY www.benfranklin300.org Benjamin Franklin: In Search of a Better World This engaging and memorable exhibition conveys the original genius, wit and imagination of Benjamin Franklin. Through a series of interactive multimedia exhibits combined with the largest collection of original Franklin materials ever assembled, Benjamin Franklin: In Search of a Better World brings our most remarkable Founding
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: Samuel Johnson After Three Hundred Years, and Beyond
    Introduction: Samuel Johnson after three hundred years, and beyond The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Weinbrot, Howard D. 2009. Introduction: Samuel Johnson after three hundred years, and beyond. Harvard Library Bulletin 20 (3-4): 1-8. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42669197 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Introduction Samuel Johnson Afer Tree Hundred Years, and Beyond Howard D. Weinbrot e now have experienced some three hundred years of Johnsonian biography, study, discussion, and friendly squabbles over meaning. We also Whave experienced historical, political, formal, Freudian, Marxist, colonial, imperial, lexicographic, and many other kinds of analyses of his major and minor works. Readers may legitimately ask, What more there is to learn about Samuel Johnson? Te distinguished Johnsonians in the following essays ofer some tentative answers to that question. Tey presented their papers at the Houghton Library’s remarkable “Johnson at 300” symposium on August 27–29, 2009. Professor James Engell delivered his paper just prior to the appended annual dinner meeting of the Johnsonians.1 1. Te contributors range across many aspects of Johnson’s career and achievement. Nicholas Hudson’s “Johnson and Revolution” carefully considers Johnson’s comments on the Revolution of 1688, locates these within his age’s political attitudes, and assesses his contribution to the concept of “revolution.” In so doing, Hudson fnds fuidity within the concepts of Whig and Tory, whose values change over time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Parallels in the Thought of Samuel Johnson and TS Eliot
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 1994 From Tragedy to Hope: A Study of the Parallels in the Thought of Samuel Johnson and T.S. Eliot Thomas Daniel McGrath This research is a product of the graduate program in English at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation McGrath, Thomas Daniel, "From Tragedy to Hope: A Study of the Parallels in the Thought of Samuel Johnson and T.S. Eliot" (1994). Masters Theses. 2038. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/2038 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates (who have written formal theses) SUBJECT: Permission to Reproduce Theses The University Library is rece1v1ng a number of requests from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow theses to be copied. PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that institution's library or research holdings. I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University not allow my thesis to be reproduced because: Author Date From Tragedy to Hope: A Study of the Parallels in the thought of Samuel Johnson and T.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Projects and Peasants: Russia's Eighteenth Century 5
    Projects and Peasants: Russia’s Eighteenth Century An Inaugural Lecture delivered at University College London on I4th March 2000 by Roger Bartlett Professor of Russian History School of Slavonic and East European Studies University College London Projects and Peasants: Russia’s Eighteenth Century Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2019 with funding from UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES) https://archive.org/details/SSEES0019 Projects and Peasants: Russia’s Eighteenth Century An Inaugural Lecture delivered in the University of London on 14th March 2000 by Roger Bartlett Professor of Russian History School of Slavonic and East European Studies University College PROJECTS AND PEASANTS: RUSSIA’S EIGHTEENTH CENTURY Roger Bartlett Projects and Peasants: Russia s Eighteenth Century © School of Slavonic and East European Studies 2000 SSEES Occasional Papers No. 44 ISBN: 0-903425-51-3 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any other form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the School of Slavonic and East European Studies. Copies of this publication and others in the School’s refereed series of Occasional Papers can be obtained from the Director’s Office, SSEES, University College London, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU Tel: +44 (0)20 7862 8511. Fax: +44 (0)20 7862 8640 Internet: http://www.ssees.ac.uk/public.htm Printed in Great Britain by Quom Selective Repro Limited, Queens Road, Loughborough, Leicestershire LEI 1 1HH Projects and Peasants: Russia’s Eighteenth Century How should we think of the eighteenth century in Europe? For those preoccupied with historical discontinuity and change, it is the prelude to the French Revolution, a great caesura which cuts us off irrevocably from the preceding ancien regime.
    [Show full text]
  • Echoes of Leibniz in Pope's Essay On
    Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee Volume 8 Issue 1 Article 3 January 2017 Echoes of Leibniz in Pope’s Essay on Man: Criticism and Cultural Shift in the Eighteenth Century Sierra Billingslea [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit Part of the Continental Philosophy Commons, History of Philosophy Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, and the Other Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Billingslea, Sierra (2017) "Echoes of Leibniz in Pope’s Essay on Man: Criticism and Cultural Shift in the Eighteenth Century," Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee: Vol. 8 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit/vol8/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Volunteer, Open Access, Library Journals (VOL Journals), published in partnership with The University of Tennessee (UT) University Libraries. This article has been accepted for inclusion in Pursuit - The Journal of Undergraduate Research at The University of Tennessee by an authorized editor. For more information, please visit https://trace.tennessee.edu/pursuit. Pursuit: The Journal of Undergraduate Research at the University of Tennessee Volume 8, Issue 1 (2017) PURSUIT Echoes of Leibniz in Pope’s Essay on Man: Criticism and Cultural Shift in the Eighteenth Century SIERRA BILLINGSLEA Towson University, Towson, MD [email protected] Advisor: Dr. George Hahn This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    [Show full text]