DOCSLIB.ORG

2021 VSGA Championship Exemptions

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021 VSGA Championship Exemptions 2021 VSGA Championship Exemptions VSGA Amateur Championship State Open of Virginia VSGA Senior Amateur Championship (120 players) (70 amateur players) (84 players) (A1) All former Amateur Champions (O1) All former State Open of Virginia Champions (SA1) All former Senior Amateur Champions (A2) Finalists in the Amateur Championship from 2018- (amateurs only) (SA2) Finalists in the Senior Amateur Championship from 2020 (O2) Top 10 amateurs and ties from the 2020 State Open 2018-2020 (A3) Semifinalists in the Amateur Championship from (O3) Amateur Champions from 2017-2021 (SA3) Semifinalists in the Senior Amateur Championship 2019-2020 (O4) Finalists in the VSGA Amateur Championship from from 2019-2020 (A4) Quarterfinalists in the Amateur Championship from 2020-2021 (SA4) Quarterfinalists in the Senior Amateur 2020 (O5) Semifinalists in the 2020 VSGA Amateur Championship from 2020 (A5) State Open Champions from 2011-2020 Championship (SA5) Senior Open Champions from 2011-2020 (A6) Top 10 amateurs and ties from the 2020 State Open (O6) Mid-Amateur Champions from 2018-2020 (amateurs only) (A7) Mid-Amateur Champions from 2018-2020 (O7) 2020 Junior Stroke Play Champion (SA6) Top five amateurs and ties from the 2020 Senior (A8) Top five finishers and ties from the 2020 (O8) 2020 Senior Amateur Champion Open Mid-Amateur Championship (O9) 2020 Senior Open Champion (if amateur) (SA7) Senior Stroke Play Champions from 2019-2021 (A9) Four-Ball Champions from 2020-2021 (O10) Top 10 eligible players from the 2020 VSGA (SA8) 2020 Mid-Senior Amateur Champion (A10) 2021 Junior Match Play Champion Player Rankings (regular) (SA9) 2020 Super Senior Amateur Champion (A11) 2020 Junior Stroke Play Champion (O11) Top 10 eligible players from the 2021 VSGA (65 & Over Division) (A12) 2020 Senior Amateur Champion Player Rankings (regular) as of June 1, 2021 (SA10) 2020-2021 Super Senior Stroke Play Champions (A13) 2021 Senior Stroke Play Champion (O12) Any player competing in the 2021 Sectional U.S. (65 & Over Division) (A14) Low amateur and ties from the 2020 Senior Open Open Qualifier or 2020 U.S. Amateur (SA11) Champions (two players) from the 2021 Four-Ball (A15) Top 20 eligible players from the 2020 VSGA Player Championship Championship (if eligible) and 2021 Senior Four- Rankings (regular) (O13) One member of the host club Ball Championship (A16) Top 10 eligible players from the 2021 VSGA Player (selected by club) (SA12) Eligible players competing in the 2021 VSGA Rankings (regular) as of June 1, 2021 Amateur and/or State Open (SA13) Top 15 eligible players from the 2020 VSGA (A17) Any player competing in the 2021 Sectional U.S. Senior Open of Virginia Open Qualifier or 2020 U.S. Amateur Player Rankings (senior) (48 amateur players) Championship (SA14) Top 10 eligible players from the 2021 VSGA (A18) One member of the host club (SO1) All former Senior Open of Virginia Champions Player Rankings (senior) as of July 26, 2021 (selected by club) (amateurs only) (SA15) Any player competing in the 2021 U.S. Senior (SO2) Top five amateurs and ties from the 2020 Senior Open Open (SA16) Any eligible player exempt into the Amateur VSGA Four-Ball/Senior Four-Ball Championships (SO3) Eligible players competing in the in the 2021 Championship that is not exempt in categories (44 sides) VSGA Amateur and/or State Open 1-15 above (FB1/SFB1) Four-Ball/Senior Four-Ball Champions from (SO4) Any player competing in the 2021 U.S. Senior (SA17) One member of the host club 2011-2020 Open (selected by club) (FB2/SFB2) Players from the top five sides and ties from (SO5) Senior Amateur Champions from 2019-2021 the 2020 Four-Ball/Senior Four-Ball (SO6) 2021 Senior Amateur Championship Finalist VSGA Junior Stroke Play Championship (FB3) 2021 Multi-Format Team Champions (SO7) 2020 Mid-Senior Amateur Champion (84 players) (Open Division) (SO8) 2020 Super Senior Amateur Champion (J1) All eligible past Junior Stroke Play, Junior Match Play (SFB3) 2021 Multi-Format Team Champions (65 & Over Division) and Junior Circuit Champions (Senior Division) (SO9) 2021 Senior Stroke Play Champion (J2) Top 10 players and ties from the 2020 VSGA Junior (FB4) 2020 Senior Four-Ball Champions (SO10) 2021 Super Senior Stroke Play Champion Stroke Play Championship (Four-Ball Championship only) (65 & Over Division) (J3) Winner of the 15 and under age group in the 2020 (SFB4) 2020 Super Senior Four-Ball Champions (65 & (SO11) Top 10 eligible players from the 2020 VSGA Junior Stroke Play Championship Over Division) Player Rankings (senior) (J4) All players advancing to the quarterfinals and beyond (Senior Four-Ball Championship only) (SO12) Top 10 eligible players from the 2021 VSGA of the 2021 VSGA Junior Match Play Championship (FB5/SFB5) Top 30 eligible players from the 2020 Player Player Rankings (senior) as of July 26, 2021 (J5) Any winner of a 2021 Junior Golf Circuit 36-hole Rankings (SO13) Any eligible player exempt into the State Open tournament (FB6/SFB6) Any player qualifying for the 2021 U.S. that is not exempt in categories 1-10 above (J6) Eligible players competing in the 2021 VSGA Amateur Four-Ball Championship (SO14) One member of the host club Amateur Championship and/or State Open (FB7) 2021 Junior Four-Ball Champions (selected by club) (J7) Any eligible player in the top 10 of the 2021 VSGA (FB8/SFB8) One side from the host club Junior Golf Circuit rankings as of July 1, 2021 (selected by club) (J8) Any eligible player who has previously qualified for the U.S. Junior Amateur Championship (J9) One member of the host club (selected by club) Exempt Player (exemption code(s)) Allara, Jack (SA10, SFB2, SFB5) Good, Tony (SFB5) Newsom, Roger (A5, A17, O1, O12, FB4, SA3, SA5, Alonzi, Mark (SFB5) Goode, Daniel (J2) SO1, SFB1, SFB2, SFB5) Angel, Jimmy (SFB4) Green III, Charles (SA1) Newsome, Randy (SFB5) Aranda, Carlos (SFB5) Groves, Dustin (A4, A6, A8, A15, O2, O10, FB2, FB5) Nirich, Jim (SFB1) Baber, Ned (A1, SA16) Gulliksen, Tyler (A4, A15, FB5) Nussey, Robert (SA13, SO11, SFB1, SFB2, SFB5) Bailey, Bob (SA13, SFB1, SFB2, SFB5) Hays, Michael (SFB2) Partridge, David (A1, SA1, SA5, SO1, SFB1) Bailey, Kyle (A15, FB1, FB2, FB5) Heath, Skeeter (A1, SA16) Passerell, David (A1, SA16) Barber, Allen (A1, SA16) Houck, Adam (A15, FB2, FB5, FB6) Payne III, Dudley (FB1) Beach, Ben (FB1) Howell, Mike (SA4, SFB5) Pemberton, Tim (A8, A15, FB5) Beck, Evan (O1, FB5) Huneycutt, Scott (SFB2) Price, Alex (A3, A15, O5, FB5) Biesecker, Nick (FB1) Hurst, Jon (SA3, SA6, SA13, SO2, SO11, SFB5) Pulk, Dave (SA2, SA5, SA13, SO1, SO11, SFB5) Bishop, Ryan (A15, FB5) Inman, Scott (A1, SA16) Reisenweaver, Scott (SA3, SA13, SO11, SFB5) Boedicker, Mark (SA2) Jackson, Wayne (A1, SA16) Robb, Chris (SFB5) Brennan, Michael (A1, A17, O3, O12, FB5) Johnson, Bryce (FB5) Romano, Francesco (FB1) Brittain, Buck (A7, A12, O6, O8, SA1, SA5, SA6, Jordan, David (SA7) Sargent, Bowen (SA2, SA6, SA13, SO2, SO11, SFB5) SA13, SO1, SO2, SO5, SO11, SFB5) Jordan, Joey (FB2) Serrao, Jay (SFB5) Buckner, Rich (SA1, SA13, SFB2, SFB5) Keating, Michael (SFB5) Serrao, Steve (A8, A15, O10, FB2, FB5, SA1, SA4, Burgess, Connor (A15, A17, O12, FB2, FB5) Kelley, Tim (SA1, SFB1) SA13, SO5, SO11, SFB1, SFB5) Campbell, Cullen (J2) Kennedy, Andrew (A2, A9, FB1, FB2, FB5) Shingler, Scott (A1, A15, A17, O10, O12, FB1, FB2, Carter, Blake (A7, A8, A15, O6, O10, FB2, FB5) Kennedy, Charlie (A6, O2, FB5, J1, J2) FB5) Chandler, Matt (FB1) Klatt, Jeffrey (SA13, SFB5) Simmons, Isaac (A15, FB2, FB5) Chinn, Kelly (A11, A15, A17, O7, O10, O12, FB5, J1, Klein, Hank (A1, SA16, SFB5) Singh, Mehrbaan (J2) J2, J8) Krulich, Mike (SFB1) Slavonia, Robert (SA6, SA13, SO2, SFB5) Chivavibul, Somsak (SFB2, SFB5) LaCroix, Brandon (FB1) Smith, Shelton (FB6) Cigna, Brandon (FB1, FB6) Lawrence, Mark (A1, SA16) Smith, Trey (A1, O3) Clatterbuck, Rob (SFB2, SFB5) Lawrence Jr., Mark (A1, A5, A6, A15, O1, O2, O3, Stanford, David (A2, A6, A15, O2, O4, O10, FB5, J1, Creasy, Connor (A17, O12) O10, FB5) J2) Cuomo, John (SA1) Lee, Bryan (J1, J2) Steele, John (SFB2) Decker, Keith (A1, O1, FB1, FB4, SA1, SA4, SA8, Long, Jeffrey (A6, O2, FB5) Sughrue, Matt (A14, O9, FB1, SA5, SA6, SA13, SO1, SA13, SO1, SO7, SO11, SFB1, SFB2, SFB5) Maben, BJ (FB1) SO2, SO11, SFB5) Delp, Jimmy (FB5) Mahone, Philip (SA3, SA4, SA13, SO11, SFB2, SFB5) Taliaferro, Nicholas (A9, FB1, FB2, FB5) DeTemple, Pete (SFB1) Marrion, Trey (J1) Tallent, Pat (A1, SA16, SFB1) Dill, Harold (FB1, FB2) McDonald, Mike (SA1) Taylor, Jimmy (A3) Duangmanee, George (A17, O12, J8) McIntosh, Ross (A1) Tinsley, Marshall (A6, A7, A15, O2, O6, O10, FB5) Duangmanee, Josh (J1) Menefee, Rob (SFB2) Tolley, David (A1) Feinstein, Bob (SFB2) Miller, Kevin (FB1) Utley, Jordan (A15, FB2, FB5) Ferguson, Brad (FB1, FB6) Montague, Jack (A5, O1) Vigotsky, Tim (SFB2, SFB5) Fischer, Stan (SA1) Morgan, Carter (FB5) Wallace, Sam (A1, SA16) Fisher, Jay (A1) Morris, Bob (SA1, SFB1) Wheeler, Vince (A3, O5) Flax, Jeffrey (SA9, SO8) Mote, Steve (SFB2) Woodson, Jim (SFB4) Flory, Tom (SA1) Moyers, Mikey (A6, A8, A15, O2, O10, FB5) Young, Cam (SA1, SFB1, SFB5) Funderburke, Ross (A4) Mullian, Glenn (SA1) Young, Justin (A6, A15, O2, O10, FB2, FB5) Gallagher, James (SFB1) Mutter, Kyle (FB1) Zampedro, Jon (SA13, SO11, SFB2, SFB5) Garrison, Scott (SFB2) Nadeau, Vincent (FB1) Zhang, Christopher (A2, A6, O2) Gasperini, Peter (A3, A6, A15, O2, FB5) Nevins, Chase (J2, J3) Zinsner, Teddy (A4, FB5) Giles, Vinny (A1, O1, SA1, SO13) .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Health Insurance Zagreb
    Health Insurance for LES Embassy of the United States of America Zagreb, Croatia Combined Synopsis and Solicitation 19GE5021R0013 Questions and Answers Q1: Please provide five years of loss data(table 1) by year of account including annual net premium (for the same period), incurred claims and membership history. For membership history (Table 2) please provide the number of Employees with single coverage and with family coverage at the end of each year. Please do not include any confidential information, just the overall statistics for the group. Claims information is critical to our pricing and the relationship of claims to employee growth or shrinkage is part of the claims analysis. Table 1 Contractual year Total claims Retention Total Net gain Net gain paid (local amount premium (local USD or EUR currency) (local paid to currency) currency) Insurer (local currency) dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 Table 2 Contractual year Single Self plus ONE Family plans dd/mm/2016 – dd/mm/2017 dd/mm/2017 – dd/mm/2018 dd/mm/2018 – dd/mm/2019 dd/mm/2019 – dd/mm/2020 dd/mm/2020 – dd/mm/2021 A1: This is a first-time post is contracting this service, historical data is not available. Q2 : We would like to know if you have been informed of Catastrophic cases, such as: Hemodynamics, Open Heart Surgery, Orthopedic Mayor Surgeries, Organ Transplant, Traumatic Accident, Cancer and Oncology Cases (Radio and Chemotherapy), and hospitalizations with more than 10 days A2: The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA
    A5 BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Dionica Osijek - Đakovo LEGENDA u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. u planu ostale autoceste MOST DRAVA ODMOR. STROSSMAYEROVAC MOST HRASTINKA MOST SAVA LINIJSKI PRIKAZ AUTOCESTE A5 BUDAPEST LEGENDA R. HRVATSKA Beli Manastir PUO Baranja Most Most Drava, L = 2485 m PUO Mursa Osijek PUO Beketinci u prometu 2007. u prometu 2009. A5 PUO Strossmayerovac u planu Most Topolina, L = 131 m ostale autoceste Most Hrastinka, L = 176 m PUO Ivandvor Most preko zapadnog lateralnog kanala, L = 133 m PUO Andrijevci Sredanci ZAGREB LIPOVAC A3 A3 Svilaj R. HRVATSKA BiH Most Sava, L = 756 m SARAJEVO AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj, dio je međunarodnog Paneuropskog cestovnog koridora Vc i jedan od najvažnijih ogranaka TEM/TER Projekta. Predmetna autocesta je dio europske mreže prome- tnica s oznakom E73, koja sjever Europe povezuje s Jadranom. Prometni koridor Vc, koji se pruža od Budimpešte preko Sarajeva do Ploča složena je poveznica sjeverne – srednje i južne Europe te predstavlja izuzetnu vri- jednost za privrednu i prometnu integraciju srednjo- europskog prostora. Izgradnjom prometnog koridora Vc povezanost i transparentnost prometnih pravaca cestovnog, željezničkog, riječnog i zračnog prometa direktno će utjecati na razvoj šireg i snažnijeg prome- tnog povezivanja Europe i Azije. 3 AUTOCESTA A5 // BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ Na dijelu Vc koridora, koji prolazi kroz teritorij Repu- Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir Osijek – Svilaj, dužine 88,6 blike Hrvatske, nalazi se autocesta A5 Beli Manastir km, podijeljena je na sljedeće dionice: – Osijek – Svilaj, koja se proteže od granice s Repu- blikom Mađarskom do granice s Republikom Bosnom Granica Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia National Report 2007
    CROATIA NATIONAL REPORT 2007 I Network The total length of motorway network, as completed by the end of 2007 in Croatia, amounts to 1163.5 km. In 2007, 75,9 km of new motorways and 3,8 km of semi motorways were built (as compared to 43 km that were built in 2006), and 15,7 km of existing roads were upgraded to the full motorway profile: On the Motorway A1: Zagreb - Split - Ploče; Dugopolje-Bisko-Šestanovac Sections (37 km) - opened to traffic in full profile in 06/2007 On the Motorway A2: Zagreb - Macelj Krapina-Macelj Section (17.2 km) –13,4 km was completed as full motorway and 3,8 km as semi motorway On the Motorway A5: Beli Manastir-Osijek-border with Bosnia and Herzegovina Sredanci-Đakovo Section (23 km) – opened to traffic as full motorway in 11/2007 On the Motorway A6: Zagreb - Rijeka - on the Vrbovsko-Bosiljevo Section (8,44 km) – upgrade to the full motorway profile of the viaduct Zeceve Drage, tunnel Veliki Gložac, viaduct Osojnik and viaduct Severinske Drage together with corresponding motorway segments in 06/2007 - on the Oštrovica-Kikovica Section (7,25 km) - upgrade to the full motorway profile in 11/2007 On the Motorway A11: Zagreb – Sisak On the Jakuševec-Velika Gorica South Section – completion of the interchange Velika Gorica South and 2,5 km of a motorway segment in 5/2007 and in 09/2007 In Croatia, motorways are operated by 4 companies, i.e. by Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. (operates all toll motorways except for those in concession) and by three concession companies BINA-ISTRA d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • A5-0206/2004
    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT GGG G G G G 1999 G G 2004 G G G Session document FINAL A5-0206/2004 22 March 2004 REPORT containing a proposal for a European Parliament recommendation to the Council on the application by Croatia for accession to the European Union 2003/2254(INI)) Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy Rapporteur: Alexandros Baltas RR\529809EN.doc PE 329.364 EN EN PE 329.364 2/15 RR\529809EN.doc EN CONTENTS Page PROCEDURAL PAGE.............................................................................................................. 4 PROPOSAL FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RECOMMENDATION TO THE COUNCIL .................................................................................................................................. 5 EXPLANATORY STATEMENT............................................................................................ 11 PROPOSAL FOR A RECOMMENDATION B5-0476/2003 ................................................. 14 RR\529809EN.doc 3/15 PE 329.364 EN PROCEDURAL PAGE At the sitting of 17 November 2003 the President of Parliament announced that he had referred the proposal for a recommendation on the application of Croatia for accession to the EU (B5-0476/2003), tabled by Alexandros Baltas on behalf of the PSE Group pursuant to Rule 49(1) of the Rules of Procedure, to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy as the committee responsible. At its meeting of 26 November 2003 the committee decided to draw up a report on the subject
    [Show full text]
  • VSGA Exemption Policy
    2020 VSGA Championship Exemptions VSGA Amateur Championship Delta Dental State Open of Virginia VSGA Senior Amateur Championship (120 players) (70 amateur players) (84 players) • (A1) All former Amateur Champions • (O1) All former State Open of Virginia Champions • (SA1) All former Senior Amateur Champions • (A2) Finalists in the Amateur Championship from 2017- (amateurs only) • (SA2) Finalists in the Senior Amateur Championship 2019 • (O2) Top 10 amateurs and ties from the 2019 State Open from 2017-2019 • (A3) Semifinalists in the Amateur Championship from • (O3) Amateur Champions from 2016-2020 • (SA3) Semifinalists in the Senior Amateur Championship 2018-2019 • (O4) Semifinalists/Finalist in the 2019 VSGA Amateur from 2018-2019 • (A4) Quarterfinalists in the Amateur Championship from Championship • (SA4) Quarterfinalists in the Senior Amateur 2019 • (O5) Mid-Amateur Champions from 2017-2019 Championship from 2019 • (A5) State Open Champions from 2010-2019 • (O6) 2019 Junior Stroke Play Champion • (SA5) Senior Open Champions from the 2010-2019 • (A6) Top 10 amateurs and ties from the 2019 State Open • (O7) 2019 Senior Amateur Champion • (SA6) Top five amateurs and ties from the 2019 Senior • (A7) Mid-Amateur Champions from 2017-2019 • (O8) 2019 Senior Open Champion (if amateur) Open • (A8) Top five finishers and ties from the 2019 • (O9) Top 10 eligible players from the 2019 VSGA Player • (SA7) Senior Stroke Play Champions from 2018-2020 Mid-Amateur Championship Rankings (regular) • (SA8) 2019 Mid-Senior Amateur Champion • (A9) The winning side (two players) from the 2020 Four- • (O10) Top 10 eligible players from the 2020 VSGA • (SA9) 2019 Super Senior Amateur Champion Ball Stroke Play Championship Player Rankings (regular) as of June 1, 2020 (65 & Over Division) • (A10) 2020 Junior Match Play Champion • (O11) Any player competing in a 2020 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Building the Link Between Flood Risk Management Planning and Climate Change Assessment in the Sava River Basin
    BUILDING THE LINK BETWEEN FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT PLANNING AND CLIMATE CHANGE ASSESSMENT IN THE SAVA RIVER BASIN Developing and implementing transboundary climate change adaptation strategies Second meeting of the global network of basins working on climate change adaptation 13-14 February 2014, Geneva Vasiljka Kolarov ISRBC Secretariat Building the link between flood risk management planning and climate change assessment in the Sava River Basin Project completed December 2013 A1 Report on already completed or ongoing FRM planning projects in the Sava River Basin A2 Report on legislation related to FRM planning and climate change adaptation (transboundary and national) A3 Report on meteorological part of development of climate projections for the Sava River Basin Report on climate change impact on flood discharge of the Sava River HBV hydrologic model of the Sava River Basin A4 Report on initial flood vulnerability assessment in the Sava River Basin ArcGIS project and accompanying spatial data A5 Report on climate change adaptation measures for flood protection in the Sava River Basin A6 Program for development of the Sava Flood Risk Management Plan A7 Report on assessment of data and information needs for preparation of a joint FRMP for the Sava River Basin ArcGIS model of the flood management related data in the form of ArcGIS file databases Second meeting of the global network of basins working on climate change adaptation 2 Climate change and vulnerability assessment Consultant’s findings: TEMPERATURE CHANGE (°C) Period/ Season spring
    [Show full text]
  • National Traffic Model for the Republic of Croatia Kick
    National Transport Model for the Republic of Croatia CLOSING CEREMONY – 04 MAY 2016 Investing in Future European Union The project is co-finannced by European Union from the European Regional Development Fund Dr Uwe Reiter Zagreb, 04 May 2016 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. The Tasks and Approach 3. The Results 4. The Way Forward Dr Uwe Reiter Zagreb, 04 May 2016 AGENDA 1. Introduction 2. The Tasks and Approach 3. The Results 4. The Way Forward Dr Uwe Reiter Zagreb, 04 May 2016 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE PROJECT Why do we need a National Transport Model for the Republic of Croatia ? Development of National Transport Strategy Identification of shortcomings / bottlenecks / needs for improvement Development of strategy alternatives Development of policies, investment strategies, projects and measures Assess the impacts of the different alternatives and select the most promising option • Impacts on transport itself: other road users, public transport users, pedestrians • Impacts on access and accessibility • Impacts on economic development • Impacts on the environment (natural, man-made, social) • Impacts on communities, visual intrusion • Impacts on participation, gender aspects • Impacts on quality of life • … Dr Uwe Reiter I Closing Ceremony I 04 May 2016 I Page 4 THE PROJECT TEAM: STRENGTHS Strong resources and backstopping capacity Local Specific knowledge modelling and expertise experience International experiences Dr Uwe Reiter I Closing Ceremony I 04 May 2016 I Page 5 Project Duration Project Events Visibility - - Phase Implementation Phase Inception Task Model Data PROJECT TIMEPROJECT SCHEDULE Collection and Surveys and Collection Implementation May Jun Jul Planned 2014 Aug Sep Oct regular project project duration regular Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Dr Uwe Reiter I Closing Ceremony Ceremony 04 II 2016 May Closing Reiter Uwe Dr May 2015 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Reserve Jan I Page Page I Feb 2016 6 Mar Apr May AGENDA 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Zagreb, Rujan 2016. A5 BELI MANASTIR
    BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ A5 Most Sava Zagreb, rujan 2016. AUTOCESTA A5: BELI MANASTIR - OSIJEK - SVILAJ DIONICA: SREDANCI – GRANICA BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE MOST SAVA Autocesta Beli Manastir – Osijek – Svilaj Autocesta Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj, dio je međunarodnog Paneuropskog cestovnog koridora Vc i jedan od najvažnijih ogranaka TEM/TER Projekta. Predmetna autocesta je dio europske mreže prometnica s oznakom E-73, koja sjever Europe povezuje s Jadranom. Prometni koridor Vc, koji se pruža od Budimpešte preko Sarajeva do Ploča, složena je poveznica sjeverne – srednje i južne Europe i predstavlja izuzetnu vrijednost u kontekstu procesa privredne i prometne integracije srednjoeuropskog prostora. Na sjevernom dijelu Vc koridora, koji prolazi kroz teritorij Republike Hrvatske, nalazi se autocesta A5 Beli Manastir – Osijek – Svilaj, koja se proteže od granice sa Republikom Mađarskom do granice sa Bosnom i Hercegovinom. U prometnoj mreži Republike Hrvatske ovaj cestovni pravac predstavlja okosnicu istočnog dijela države i spaja Osječko-Baranjsku županiju na koridor X, tj. autocestu Zagreb - Lipovac. Planirana autocesta, osim kraćeg, bržeg i ugodnijeg putovanja između istočnog i primorskog dijela zemlje, uvelike će pridonijeti gospodarskom razvoju krajeva kroz koje prolazi. Autocesta A5 Beli Manastir Osijek – Svilaj, dužine 88,6 km, podijeljena je na sljedeće dionice: • Granica Republike Mađarske - Beli Manastir, dužine 5,0 km • Beli Manastir – Osijek, dužine 24,6 km • Osijek – Đakovo, dužine 32,5 km • Đakovo – Sredanci, dužine 23,0 km • Sredanci – granica Bosne i Hercegovine, dužine 3,5 km. Dionica Đakovo – Sredanci puštena je u promet 2007. godine, dionica Osijek – Đakovo 2009. godine dok je dionica Sredanci - granica BiH (izuzev mosta preko rijeke Save) izgrađena i puštena u promet 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • CORRIDOR Vc COMPLETION PROJECT Loan No.: 41325
    CORRIDOR Vc COMPLETION PROJECT Loan no.: 41325 Contract title: Civil works on construction of A5 Motorway Subsection (Beli Manastir - Osijek - Svilaj): "Drava Bridge - Osijek Interchange" (in a total length of 3.8 km) Publication ref.: CVcCP /OT/civil works/DB–OI (i) Name of each tenderer who submitted a Tender 1. Viadukt d.d. (Zagreb, Croatia); 2. Strabag AG (Spittal/Drau, Austria); 3. Swietelsky B.m.b.H. (Zagreb, Croatia); 4. Integral Inženjering AD (Laktaši - Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina); 5. Joint Venture: GP Krk d.d. (Krk, Croatia) - leading partner; Hidepito ZRT (Budapest, Hungary) - partner; (ii) Tender prices as read out at Tender opening (excluding VAT); 1. 16.852.270,30 EUR 2. 17.346.863,43 EUR 3. 16.571.692,32 EUR 4. 18.927.827,30 EUR 5. 19.156.809,01 EUR (iii) Name and evaluated prices of each Tender that was evaluated; 1. Viadukt d.d. (Zagreb, Croatia); Evaluated price: 14.929.943,65 EUR 2. Strabag AG (Spittal/Drau, Austria) Evaluated price: 16.520.822,31 EUR 3. Swietelsky B.m.b.H. (Zagreb, Croatia); Evaluated price: 15.782.564,11 EUR 4. Integral Inženjering AD (Laktaši - Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina); Evaluated price: 16.234.419,11 EUR (iv) Name of tenderers whose Tenders were rejected; Joint Venture: GP Krk d.d. (Krk, Croatia) - leading partner; Hidepito ZRT (Budapest, Hungary) - partner; (v) Name of the winning tenderer, and the price it offered, as well as the duration and summary scope of the contract awarded; Name of the winning tender: Viadukt d.d.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia Insight Paper
    RURAL SHARED MOBILITY www.ruralsharedmobility.eu CROATIA INSIGHT PAPER Authors: Andrea Lorenzini, Giorgio Ambrosino MemEx Italy Photo by Hrvoje Klaric on Unsplash Date: 20.05.2019 RURALITY (1) Degree of urbanisation for local administrative units Urban-rural typology for NUTS level 3 regions level 2 (LAU2) Cities Predominantly urban regions (rural population is less than 20% of the total population) Towns and suburbs Intermediate regions Rural Areas (rural population is between 20% and 50% of the total population) Data not available Predominantly rural regions (rural population is 50% or more of the total population) Source: Eurostat, JRC and European Commission Directorate-General Data not available for Regional Policy, 20 January 2014 Source: Eurostat, JRC, EFGS, REGIO-GIS, December 2016 1 - Insight Paper - CROATIA RURAL SHARED MOBILITY DISTRIBUTION OF POPULATION Share of people living Share of people living Share of people 27.3% 33.4% 39.2% in cities in towns and suburbs living in rural areas Source: Eurostat, 2017 GEOGRAPHY Officially part of the European Union from 1 July 2013, According to Eurostat, the share of people at risk Croatia is currently the newest member of the EU. From of poverty or social exclusion in rural areas in 2017 a geographical point of view, Croatia can be divided into amounts to 33,1%, so much higher with respect to the three different zones: the coastal strip on the Adriatic urban areas, where it stands at 18,0%. Sea, the mountain ranges (The Dinaric Alps) and the wide flat area (lowland Pannonian). According to the A part of rural population lives in conditions of severe Urban-rural typology for NUTS level 3 regions, in 2015 poverty and cannot satisfy their basic life necessities.
    [Show full text]
  • CROATIAN MOTORWAYS Ltd. – a SPONSOR OR a MANAGER Marijo Lovrinčević, Hrvatske Autoceste D.O.O., Zagreb, HR Marijo.Lovrinčević@Hac.Hr
    A WAY TO SUCCESS: CROATIAN MOTORWAYS Ltd. – A SPONSOR OR A MANAGER Marijo Lovrinčević, Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o., Zagreb, HR Marijo.Lovrinčević@hac.hr The intensive construction of motorways in Croatia that has marked the previous decade posed great challenges before all participants in what is undoubtedly the greatest Croatian infrastructure project in the history. Motorways are public good and as such are of national importance which makes the role of the Government and of Croatian Motorways Ltd. ( Hrvatske Autoceste - HAC) that operate the network on its behalf very responsible. Before opening to traffic kilometres of motorways, a series of procedures had to be implemented including planning, design development and construction during which many subjects and institutions were engaged and often for long periods of time. This has resulted in such projects being subject to many political, economical, social and other impacts that directly affect their completion. The paper shows their relations and envisages the role of the investor as a sponsor i.e. operator within a specific institutional framework as is Hrvatske Autoceste company that has established, in the conditions of accelerated development, a professional, competent and motivated structure open to new knowledge and willing to accept new ideas and changes. The cooperation of all participants is a guarantee of success. KEY WORDS: construction of motorways, the role of investor, institutional framework, success. INTRODUCTION An efficient transport system is of great importance for any country's economy. The development of transport infrastructure depends on political, economic and sociological conditions of regions. Since these are structures of national importance the models for the construction of this infrastructure are based on the adopted transport policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030)
    Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) Republic of Croatia MINISTRY OF THE SEA, TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 - 2030) May 2017 The project is co-financed by the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund. Republic of Croatia Ministry of the Sea, Transport and Infrastructure I Transport Development Strategy of the Republic of Croatia (2017 – 2030) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Background on development of a Croatian Comprehensive National Transport Plan .................................................. 1 1.2 Objectives of the Transport Development Strategy (TDS 2016) ............................. 4 1.3 Revision of the TDS (2016) Ex-Ante conditionality .................................................. 4 1.4 Methodology for the development of the TDS (2016) ............................................ 5 2 Analysis .................................................................................................................... 7 2.1 General aspects of transport ................................................................................... 7 2.2 Public transport and zero-emission modes ........................................................... 34 2.3 Rail Transport......................................................................................................... 72 2.4 Road transport ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]