DOCSLIB.ORG

Prepared For: Prepared By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prepared For: Prepared By PDF Page 1 of 29 APPENDIX F TERA Vegetation Survey Results Summary PDF Page 2 of 29 VEGETATION SUMMARY REPORT FOR THE PROPOSED NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. NORTH MONTNEY MAINLINE (AITKEN CREEK SECTION) March 2013 8860 Prepared for: Prepared by: NOVA Gas transmission Ltd. A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited TERA Environmental Consultants Calgary, Alberta Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Ph: 403-265-2885 PDF Page 3 of 29 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Vegetation Summary Report North Montney Mainline (Aitken Creek Section) March 2013/8860 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Details ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Ecosystem Classification .................................................................................................... 3 2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Study Area Boundaries ....................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Desktop Review .................................................................................................................. 4 2.3 Field Data Collection ........................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 Rare Plants and Rare Ecological Communities ..................................................... 4 2.3.2 Non-Native and Invasive Species .......................................................................... 5 2.4 Collection of Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) ........................................................ 5 3.0 RESULTS OF THE LITERATURE / DESKTOP REVIEW ............................................................... 6 3.1 Vegetation Community Delineation ..................................................................................... 6 3.2 Non-Native and Invasive Species ....................................................................................... 6 3.3 Old-Growth Management Areas ......................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS OF THE VEGETATION SURVEY .................................................................................. 7 4.1 Vegetation Communities ..................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Rare Plants ......................................................................................................................... 7 4.3 Rare Ecological Communities ............................................................................................. 9 4.4 Non-Native and Invasive Species ....................................................................................... 9 4.5 Survey Limitations ............................................................................................................... 9 5.0 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Literature Cited .................................................................................................................. 10 5.2 GIS References ................................................................................................................. 11 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Observed Plant Species – by Type and Common Name ................................................A-1 Appendix B Photoplates ......................................................................................................................B-1 Appendix C Vegetation Survey Locations and Observed Habitats .................................................... C-1 Appendix D Rare Plant Observation Data .......................................................................................... D-1 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Location and Old-Growth Management Areas .................................................... 2 Figure 2 Vegetation Survey Locations - 2011 ................................................................................... 8 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Summary of Vegetation Field Work and Aboriginal Field Study Participation for the Project ...................................................................................................................... 5 Table 2 Vegetation Site Units Observed .......................................................................................... 7 Table 3 2011 Rare Plant Observations ............................................................................................ 9 Page i PDF Page 4 of 29 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Vegetation Summary Report North Montney Mainline (Aitken Creek Section) March 2013/8860 LIST OF PLATES Plate 1 View of moist mixedwood forest located in 94-B-8/Block A (August 12, 2011). ................. 2 Plate 2 View west of a bog habitat observed in 94-B-8/Block I (August 17, 2011). ........................ 2 Plate 3 View south of a swamp habitat observed in 94-B-8/Block A (August 13, 2011). ............................................................................................................... 3 Plate 4 View south of a riparian area observed in 94-B-8/Block H (August 16, 2011). .................. 3 Plate 5 View of potential Iowa golden-saxifrage observed in 94-B-8/Block H (August 16, 2011). ............................................................................................................... 4 Plate 6 View of northern bog bedstraw observed in 94-B-8/Block I (August 13, 2011). ................. 4 Plate 7 View of peat moss (Sphagnum wulfianum) observed in 94-B-8/Block H (August 14, 2011). ............................................................................................................... 5 Page ii PDF Page 5 of 29 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Vegetation Summary Report North Montney Mainline (Aitken Creek Section) March 2013/8860 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Project Details NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. (NGTL), a wholly owned subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited, is applying to the National Energy Board (NEB) under Section 52 of the NEB Act for authorisation to construct and operate new pipeline facilities (the Project) in the North Montney area of British Columbia (BC). These facilities will be known as the North Montney Mainline (Aitken Creek and Kahta Sections). The preliminary scope of the Project includes approximately 305 km of up to 1,219 mm (NPS 48) outside diameter (O.D.) pipe and related facilities to provide adequate capacity to transport natural gas supply in the northeast BC area. The results of this report are limited to the Aitken Creek Section. To support the NEB Section 52 Application, TERA Environmental Consultants (TERA) was commissioned by NGTL to conduct vegetation field work along the proposed Project. This report describes the results of vegetation field work conducted for the Project during August 11 to 21, 2011. Vegetation field work was conducted on various pipeline route options in August 2011. Figure 1 shows the current 2013 Aitken Creek Route and all pipeline route options that have been considered, including pipeline routes that were surveyed in the field in 2011. This report summarises the results of the vegetation surveys for pipeline routes where field work was conducted in spring 2011. Figure 2 provides greater detail on the locations where field work was conducted. Page 1 PDF Page 6 of 29 r e v i R n o t ¯ t a e B 94G2 94G1 94H4 94H3 94H2 Pink Mountain Aitken Creek ST97 T Receipt Meter Station o w !." KP 180.9 n A s i e G t k n e u n d n d C C re e k r e y e k 94A15 94B15 94B16 C 94A13 94A14 r e e k !. C KP 160 a m e Buick r o n Beaton River R Wonowon i I.R. 204 v e r 94A11 94A10 KP 140 94A12 !. r Blueberry! ! River! i v e ! B l u r y R I.R. 205 e b e r ! ! T. 88 ! 94B10 94B9 ! ! Wh i s p e r in g Pi n e La k e ! R. 25 R. 21 ! R. 17 R. 24 R. 23 R. 22 R. 19 R. 18 W6M !R. 20 W6M !. ! KP 120 ! Halfway River ! I.R. 168 ! ! D a v ie s ! T. 86 ! e k La k e e r ! H C a ! s l r e f w ! e b ay ree R v k i o G irc C i ! r oun d b h v R K e T. 85 94B7 94B8 r ! C h a rl ie n 94A5 La k e o ! ! !. t ! t ! KP 100 a ek ! Cre Beatton e ! e ll B rr ! ! ! a Provincial Park ! F ! ! ! ! ! ! T. 84 ! ! ! ! ! ! Fort ! P ! ! ! e ! ! St. John ! ! ! a ! ! ! c e ! ! ! ! ! R r ! ! ! ! i v e ! ! ! ! ! Attachie ! ! ! ! ! Butler Ridge ! Peace-Moberly Subzone ! ! T. 83 Provincial Park KP 80 Proposed Protected Area ! ! ! !. ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! !! ! ! ! ! KP 60 Taylor ! !. ! ! ! ! Bo u d re a u ! ! ! ! 94B2 KP 40 ! Wi 94B1 ! La k e e r l ! l is !. ! v T. 82 t o Beryl ! i n ! R L e ! a ! ! k Prairie n e ! i ! ! r ! P ! Peace River/Boudreau e ! v ! ! Proposed Protected Area i ! R ! Hudson's l y ! !. ! ! r KP 20 ! Hope e ! ! b ! ! o T. 81 ! ! ! ! ! !!! !!! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Bo u c h e r M ! ! ! ! ! ! !!! ! ! ! ! ! La k e ! !!! ! ! ! !! ! ! D in o s a ur ! ! !!! !! ! ! ! ! La k e ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! " ! C a rbo nFort ! !. KP 0 ! ! ! ! !( Nelson ! BCLa k e AB ! T. 80 ! Existing Saturn ! ! ! ! ! ! Receipt Meter Station ! ! ! ! ! ST29! Map Area ! ! ! ! ! East Moberly ! ! ! ! Lake I.R. 169 ! ! 93O15 93O16 ! ! 93P13 Sunset ! ! ! ! ! T. 79 ! ! Prairie ! ! Klin-se-za !! ! ! ! ! ! Fort ! ! ! ! West Moberly ! ProvincialSt. John Park y L a k e ! ! ! ! r l !(
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepared For: Prepared By
    RARE PLANT SURVEY FOR THE PROPOSED NOVA GAS TRANSMISSION LTD. KEARL EXTENSION PIPELINE PROJECT August 2010 6426 Prepared for: Prepared by: NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of TERA Environmental Consultants TransCanada PipeLines Limited Suite 1100, 815 - 8th Avenue S.W. Calgary, Alberta T2P 3P2 Calgary, Alberta Ph: 403-265-2885 NOVA Gas Transmission Ltd. Rare Plant Survey Kearl Lake Pipeline Project August 2010 / 6426 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Ecosystem Classification .................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Pre-Field Assessment......................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Study Area Boundaries ....................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Rare Plant Surveys ............................................................................................................. 4 2.4 Non-Native and Invasive Species....................................................................................... 5 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands 1996
    National List of Vascular Plant Species that Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary Indicator by Region and Subregion Scientific Name/ North North Central South Inter- National Subregion Northeast Southeast Central Plains Plains Plains Southwest mountain Northwest California Alaska Caribbean Hawaii Indicator Range Abies amabilis (Dougl. ex Loud.) Dougl. ex Forbes FACU FACU UPL UPL,FACU Abies balsamea (L.) P. Mill. FAC FACW FAC,FACW Abies concolor (Gord. & Glend.) Lindl. ex Hildebr. NI NI NI NI NI UPL UPL Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. FACU FACU FACU Abies grandis (Dougl. ex D. Don) Lindl. FACU-* NI FACU-* Abies lasiocarpa (Hook.) Nutt. NI NI FACU+ FACU- FACU FAC UPL UPL,FAC Abies magnifica A. Murr. NI UPL NI FACU UPL,FACU Abildgaardia ovata (Burm. f.) Kral FACW+ FAC+ FAC+,FACW+ Abutilon theophrasti Medik. UPL FACU- FACU- UPL UPL UPL UPL UPL NI NI UPL,FACU- Acacia choriophylla Benth. FAC* FAC* Acacia farnesiana (L.) Willd. FACU NI NI* NI NI FACU Acacia greggii Gray UPL UPL FACU FACU UPL,FACU Acacia macracantha Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd. NI FAC FAC Acacia minuta ssp. minuta (M.E. Jones) Beauchamp FACU FACU Acaena exigua Gray OBL OBL Acalypha bisetosa Bertol. ex Spreng. FACW FACW Acalypha virginica L. FACU- FACU- FAC- FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acalypha virginica var. rhomboidea (Raf.) Cooperrider FACU- FAC- FACU FACU- FACU- FACU* FACU-,FAC- Acanthocereus tetragonus (L.) Humm. FAC* NI NI FAC* Acanthomintha ilicifolia (Gray) Gray FAC* FAC* Acanthus ebracteatus Vahl OBL OBL Acer circinatum Pursh FAC- FAC NI FAC-,FAC Acer glabrum Torr. FAC FAC FAC FACU FACU* FAC FACU FACU*,FAC Acer grandidentatum Nutt.
    [Show full text]
  • Algific Talus (Cts46)
    Species Frequently Found in Native Plant Communities Southern Algific Talus (CTs46) Types in Class: Algific Talus (CTs46a) Limestone Subtype (CTs46a1) Dolomite Subtype (CTs46a2) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status Abies balsamea Balsam fir Acer saccharum Sugar maple Acer spicatum Mountain maple Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel Special Concern Allium cernuum Nodding wild onion Threatened Arabis hirsuta Hairy rock cress Betula alleghaniensis Yellow birch Chrysosplenium iowense Iowa golden saxifrage Endangered Cryptogramma stelleri Slender cliff brake Cystopteris bulbifera Bulblet fern Dicentra cucullaria Dutchman's breeches Enemion biternatum False rue anemone Gymnocarpium robertianum Northern oak fern Impatiens spp. touch-me-not Impatiens capensis Spotted touch-me-not Impatiens pallida Pale touch-me-not Laportea canadensis Wood nettle Linnaea borealis var. longiflora Twinflower Mertensia paniculata Panicled bluebells Mitella nuda Naked miterwort Pinus strobus White pine Rhamnus alnifolia Dwarf alder Ribes hudsonianum Northern black currant Rubus idaeus var. strigosus Red raspberry Sambucus racemosa Red-berried elder Saxifraga pensylvanica Swamp saxifrage Taxus canadensis Canada yew Urtica dioica ssp. gracilis Stinging nettle Viburnum trilobum Highbush cranberry Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2005). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program. MNDNR St. Paul, MN. Limestone Subtype (CTs46a1) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status No information available Dolomite Subtype (CTs46a2) Scientific Name Column1 Common Name Rare Status No information available Source: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2005). Field Guide to the Native Plant Communities of Minnesota: The Eastern Broadleaf Forest Province. Ecological Land Classification Program, Minnesota County Biological Survey, and Natural Heritage and Nongame Research Program.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Iowa Plant Species List
    !PLANTCO FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT TECHNIQUE: IOWA DATABASE This list has been modified from it's origional version which can be found on the following website: http://www.public.iastate.edu/~herbarium/Cofcons.xls IA CofC SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME PHYSIOGNOMY W Wet 9 Abies balsamea Balsam fir TREE FACW * ABUTILON THEOPHRASTI Buttonweed A-FORB 4 FACU- 4 Acalypha gracilens Slender three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 3 Acalypha ostryifolia Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 5 UPL 6 Acalypha rhomboidea Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU 0 Acalypha virginica Three-seeded mercury A-FORB 3 FACU * ACER GINNALA Amur maple TREE 5 UPL 0 Acer negundo Box elder TREE -2 FACW- 5 Acer nigrum Black maple TREE 5 UPL * Acer rubrum Red maple TREE 0 FAC 1 Acer saccharinum Silver maple TREE -3 FACW 5 Acer saccharum Sugar maple TREE 3 FACU 10 Acer spicatum Mountain maple TREE FACU* 0 Achillea millefolium lanulosa Western yarrow P-FORB 3 FACU 10 Aconitum noveboracense Northern wild monkshood P-FORB 8 Acorus calamus Sweetflag P-FORB -5 OBL 7 Actaea pachypoda White baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Actaea rubra Red baneberry P-FORB 5 UPL 7 Adiantum pedatum Northern maidenhair fern FERN 1 FAC- * ADLUMIA FUNGOSA Allegheny vine B-FORB 5 UPL 10 Adoxa moschatellina Moschatel P-FORB 0 FAC * AEGILOPS CYLINDRICA Goat grass A-GRASS 5 UPL 4 Aesculus glabra Ohio buckeye TREE -1 FAC+ * AESCULUS HIPPOCASTANUM Horse chestnut TREE 5 UPL 10 Agalinis aspera Rough false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 10 Agalinis gattingeri Round-stemmed false foxglove A-FORB 5 UPL 8 Agalinis paupercula False foxglove
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6134 Department of Natural Resources Endangered and Threatened Species
    MINNESOTA RULES 1993 546 CHAPTER 6134 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES ENDANGERED AND THREATENED SPECIES 6134.0100 STATUTORY AUTHORITY. 6134.0300 VASCULAR PLANTS. 6134.0200 ANIMAL SPECIES. 6134.0400 LICHENS; MOSSES. 6134.0100 STATUTORY AUTHORITY. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 84.0895, the species of wild animals and plants listed in parts 6134.0200 to 6134.0400 are designated as endangered, threatened, or of spe­ cial concern, as indicated in those parts. Statutory Authority: MS s 84.0895 History: 8SR 1921;L 1986 c386art4s9 6134.0200 ANIMAL SPECIES. Subpart 1. Mammals. The scientific names and the common names in this subpart are according to the Revised Checklist of North American Mammals North of Mexico, J. K. Jones, et al., 1982. The following species of mammals are designated as: A. Endangered: none. B. Threatened: Canis lupus, gray wolf. C. Of special concern: (1) Cervus elaphus, American elk; (2) Cryptotis parva, least shrew; (3) Felis concolor, mountain lion; (4) Gulo gulo, wolverine; (5) Martes americana, marten; (6) Microtus chrotorrhinus, rock vole; (7) Microtus ochrogaster, prairie vole; (8) Microtus pinelorum, woodland vole; (9) Myotis keenii, Keens' myotis; (10) Odocoileus hemionus, mule deer; (11) Phenacomys intermedius, heather vole; (12) Pipistrellus subflavus, eastern pipistrelle; (13) Rangifer tarandus, caribou; (14) Spilogale putorius, spotted skunk; (15) Synaptomys borealis, northern bog lemming; (16) Thomomys talpoides, northern pocket gopher. Subp. 2. Birds. The scientific names and the common names in this subpart are accord­ ing to the American Ornithologists Union Checklist, 1983. The following species of birds are designated as: A. Endangered: (1) Ammodramus bairdii, Baird's sparrow; (2) Anthus spragueii, Sprague's pipit; (3) Athene cunicularia, burrowing owl; (4) Calcarius ornatus, chestnut-collared longspur; (5) Charadrius melodus, piping plover; (6) Falco peregrinus, peregrine falcon.
    [Show full text]
  • IRIS Feb-09.Indd
    Iris No. 59 • February 2009 The Alberta Native Plant Council Newsletter Russian Thistle Research in Jasper National Park By Tim Antill For the past year I have been studying Russian thistle (Salsola kali L.) in Jasper National Park as a Master of Science project at the University of Alberta under the supervision of Dr. Anne Naeth. Russian thistle is a non-native plant that has been invading native montane grassland communities used for winter grazing by bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis Shaw) in Jasper National Park. Parks Canada has identified a concern that these areas of invasion may be increasing in size. Areas invaded by Russian thistle appear to coincide with areas subject to sustained use by sheep, elk (Cervus Linnaeus) and possibly deer elaphus Montane grassland in Jasper National Park. (Odocoileus spp.). Areas of critical Photo T. Antill winter sheep habitat are believed to be overgrazed, reducing range condition become established and compete with, assess management options to control and permitting Russian thistle to or replace, already stressed native plant this invasive plant. species and reduce wildlife forage. Russian thistle, commonly referred to as The research project tumbleweed, is almost synonymous with In this Issue ... objectives are to gain a iconic images of the American old west. better understanding of It is not too difficult to picture the dried Botany AB 2009 set for June ....................3 the biology of the plant blonde skeleton of this plant slowly ANPC Contacts List ..................................3 in the park, to determine rolling down some empty dusty street Puzzling Rare Pairs: the influence of ungulate in a ghost town straight out of an old Golden & Green Saxifrage .......................4 grazing on Russian thistle Hollywood western movie.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity
    Appendix I Biodiversity Appendix I1 Literature Review – Biodiversity Resources in the Oil Sands Region of Alberta Syncrude Canada Ltd. Mildred Lake Extension Project Volume 3 – EIA Appendices December 2014 APPENDIX I1: LITERATURE REVIEW – BIODIVERSITY RESOURCES IN THE OIL SANDS REGION OF ALBERTA TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 BIOTIC DIVERSTY DATA AND SUMMARIES ................................................................ 1 1.1 Definition ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Biodiversity Policy and Assessments .................................................................... 1 1.3 Environmental Setting ........................................................................................... 2 1.3.1 Ecosystems ........................................................................................... 2 1.3.2 Biota ...................................................................................................... 7 1.4 Key Issues ............................................................................................................. 9 1.4.1 Alteration of Landscapes and Landforms ............................................. 9 1.4.2 Ecosystem (Habitat) Alteration ........................................................... 10 1.4.3 Habitat Fragmentation and Edge Effects ............................................ 10 1.4.4 Cumulative Effects .............................................................................. 12 1.4.5 Climate Change .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern
    Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern NatureServe Canada contributes to the conservation of Canada’s biodiversity by providing scientific data and expertise about species and ecosystems of conservation concern to support decision-making, research, and education. Citation: Cannings, S., M. Anions, R. Rainer, and B. Stein. 2005. Our Home and Native Land: Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern. NatureServe Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. © NatureServe Canada 2005 ISBN 0-9711053-4-0 Primary funding for the publication of this report was provided by the Suncor Energy Foundation. This report is also available in French. To request a copy, please contact NatureServe Canada. NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 613-759-1861 www.natureserve-canada.ca Our Home and Native Land Canadian Species of Global Conservation Concern by Sydney Cannings Marilyn F. E. Anions Rob Rainer Bruce A. Stein Sydney Cannings NatureServe Yukon Fish and Wildlife Branch Yukon Department of the Environment P.O. Box 2703 Whitehorse, Yukon Y1A 2C6 867-667-3684 Marilyn F. E. Anions NatureServe Canada 960 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 Note on Captions: For each species, captions state the range in Canada only, as well as the NatureServe global conservation status. 613-759-1942 Rob Rainer Front Cover Chelsea, Québec Left to right: Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Vulnerable (G3). 819-827-9082 British Columbia. / Photo by Jared Hobbs. Golden paintbrush (Castilleja levisecta). Critically imperiled (G1). British Bruce A. Stein, Ph.D. Columbia. / Photo by Leah Ramsay, British Columbia Conservation Data NatureServe Centre. 1101 Wilson Blvd., 15th Floor Spotted owl (Strix occidentalis).
    [Show full text]
  • Leismer to Kettle River Crossover Project
    August 29, 2013 MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT Supplemental Vegetation and Wetlands Survey Report Submitted to: NOVA Gas Transmission Limited A Wholly Owned Subsidiary of TransCanada PipeLines Limited 450 - 1st Street SW Calgary, AB T2P 4K5 Report Number: 1213440055/3000/3010 Distribution: REPORT Electronic Copy - TransCanada, Calgary, AB MOOSA CROSSOVER PROJECT - SUPPLEMENTAL VEGETATION AND WETLANDS SURVEY REPORT Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 METHODS ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 Listed Plant Species Surveys .............................................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Invasive Plant Surveys ........................................................................................................................................ 4 3.3 Vegetation Community Classification .................................................................................................................. 5 3.4 Wetlands Classification.......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • IAC 9/9/09 Natural Resource Commission[571] Ch 77, P.1 CHAPTER 77 ENDANGERED and THREATENED PLANT and ANIMAL SPECIES 571—77.1(
    IAC 9/9/09 Natural Resource Commission[571] Ch 77, p.1 CHAPTER 77 ENDANGERED AND THREATENED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES [Prior to 12/31/86, Conservation Commission[290], Ch 19] 571—77.1(481B) Definitions. As used in this rule: “Endangered species” means any species of fish, plant life, or wildlife which is in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant part of its range. “Special concern species” means any species about which problems of status or distribution are suspected, but not documented, and for which no special protection is afforded under this rule. “Threatened species” means any species which is likely to become an endangered species within the foreseeable future throughout all or a significant portion of its range. 571—77.2(481B) Endangered, threatened, and special concern animals. The natural resource commission, in consultation with scientists with specialized knowledge and experience, has determined the following animal species to be endangered, threatened or of special concern in Iowa: 77.2(1) Endangered animal species: Mammals Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis Plains Pocket Mouse Perognathus flavescens Red-backed Vole Clethrionomys gapperi Spotted Skunk Spilogale putorius Birds Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Northern Harrier Circus cyaneus Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Common Barn Owl Tyto alba Least Tern Sterna antillarum King Rail Rallus elegans Short-eared Owl Asio flammeus Fish Lake Sturgeon Acipenser fulvescens Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus Pugnose Shiner Notropis anogenus Weed Shiner Notropis texanus
    [Show full text]
  • 1\Ilfl1lfl1~\Ili~~L1illr111111111i1~111I1i11~1 R
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an LEGISLATIVE REFERENCE LIBRARY ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) 3 1\ilfl1lfl1~\ili~~l1illr111111111i1~111i1i11~13 0307 00060 5728 r STATUS REPORT ON Chrysoplenium iowense (Golden saxifrage) IN MINNESOTA Report compiled under contract for USFW Service Endangered Species Office by Welby Smith Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Section of W-iliflife- - N~tnr~l f-Tpnt<;ip-P Prno-r-;im - - March, 1989 Clc: :E "'Q) > gni § :E 0 Q) iii Ui ~ @~--'----~---~-----"----- )TA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES - BIOLOGICAL REPORT NO. 7 Status report on Chrysospleniurn iowense Rydb. (golden saxifrage) in Minnesota Taxon name: Chrysosplenium iowense Rydb. Corrm:m name: Golden saxifrage Family: Saxifragaceae . ,:n~O.L,C:I:::> Wllt::.Le: L..a.AUll UL.;\,.;U.LI:::> i l'll.lillt::l:::>UL.Cl C:UlU .LUWCl Current federal status: Category 2 Recomnended federal status: Threatened (for Minnesota p:>pulations) Author of report: Welby Smith Date of rep:>rt: March, 1989 Table of Contents I Species Infonnation 1 1. Classification and nomenclature 1 2. Present legal or other fonnal status 2 3. Description 2 4. Significance 3 5. Geographic distribution 3 /:;. r'~noY-::ll on·ui"t'Y"\nmon+ !:In~ "h!:!hit-!:!+ ~oeort.,....;T'"'\+.;'"'n .... 7. Population biology 5 8. Population ecology 6 9. Current land ownership and management res:ponsibility 6 10. Management practices and experience 6 11. Evidence of threat to survival 6 II Assessment and Reccmnendations 7 12.
    [Show full text]