Frontotemporal Dementia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
2020 Question Book
2020 QUESTION BOOK 13TH EDITION WHO WE ARE Welcome to the thirteenth edition of the Ninja’s Guide to PRITE! Loma Linda University Medical Center is located in sunny Southern California. about 60 miles east of Los Angeles. A part of the Adventist Health System, we provide patient care in one of the largest non-profit health systems in the nation. Loma Linda's mission is to excel in medical education, global healthcare, and community outreach, all under a central tenant: "To Make Man Whole." At the Loma Linda Department of Psychiatry, our residents are trained in many diverse patient care settings. As an official World Health Organization Collaboration Center, our department funds resident electives in Global Mental Health at locations around the world. Additionally, our residents can participate in national and international disaster relief on the LLU Behavioral Health Trauma Team. We were proud to welcome our first group of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry fellows in the Summer of 2019 and work collaboratively with 3 other residency programs within the region. Our residency didactic education is constantly evolving based upon resident feedback, and our residents have the opportunity to aid in course development. More than anything, our residency fosters an environment where residents and faculty treat each other like family. Our faculty are dedicated to resident education and professional development. We believe in "taking 'No' off the table", encouraging innovative change, and passionately supporting our residents to achieve anything they set their minds to. For over a decade our residents have volunteered their time to create The Ninja's Guide to PRITE at our Annual Ninja PRITE Workshop. -
Primary Progressive Aphasia and Kindred Disorders
Handbook of Clinical Neurology, Vol. 89 (3rd series) Dementias C. Duyckaerts, I. Litvan, Editors # 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved Primary progressive aphasias Chapter 54 Primary progressive aphasia and kindred disorders MARSEL MESULAM* AND SANDRA WEINTRAUB Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA 54.1. Introduction Bub, 1997; Kertesz et al., 2000, 2002; Hillis, 2002, 2004; Grossman and Moore, 2005). Terms such as The existence of progressive aphasias has been known progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic for more than 100 years. Pick (1892, 1904), Se´rieux dementia, aphasic variant of frontotemporal dementia (1893), Franceschi (1908), and Rosenfeld (1909) were (FTD), temporal variant of frontotemporal lobar among the first to report such patients. The current resur- degeneration (FTLD), Gogi aphasia and progressive gence of interest in this condition can be traced to a 1982 aphasia have been used, mostly implicitly, to denote report of six patients with a slowly progressive aphasia variants of PPA (Neary et al., 1998; Miller et al., and to the subsequent delineation of the primary progres- 1999). We prefer the PPA term as a root diagnosis sive aphasia (PPA) syndrome (Mesulam, 1982, 1987, for two reasons: not all progressive aphasias fulfill 2007; Mesulam and Weintraub, 1992). the PPA criteria and not all PPA cases are caused According to currently accepted criteria, the PPA by FTLD pathology. The word “primary” is a key diagnosis is made in any patient in whom a language descriptor that emphasizes the selective salience of impairment (aphasia), caused by a neurodegenerative the language disturbance and the relative preservation disease (progressive), constitutes the most salient aspect of other cognitive domains at initial stages. -
Theory of Mind Deficit in the Behavioral Variant of Frontotemporal Dementia and in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Why Does It Matter?
Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery Editorial Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg Volume 1 Issue 1 - December 2015 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Marco Cavallo Theory of Mind deficit in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia and in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Why does it matter? Marco Cavallo1,2* 1eCampus University, Novedrate (Como), Italy 2Mental Health Department - Azienda Sanitaria Locale Torino 3, Italy Submission: November 15, 2015; Published: December 02, 2015 *Corresponding author: Marco Cavallo, Neuropsychologist, Researcher at the faculty of Psychology of the eCampus University of Novedrate, Italy, Tel no: +39.3478306430; Email: Editorial stories that explicitly referred to social situations. Our results underlined the needs for further research to gain a deeper Theory of Mind (hereinafter referred to as ToM) is the ability understanding on the possible link between patient’s behavioral to explain and predict other people’s behavior by attributing problems and their limited understanding of social situations. independent mental states to them. It allows us to recognize that mental states such as beliefs, intentions, and desires play a key role in driving and monitoring human behavior. Impairment in associated with ALS, a neurodegenerative disease that from We also aimed at clarifying the nature of the ToM deficits ToM ability can be highly disabling. ToM had been extensively cognitive and neuroimaging points of view appears to share studied in neuropsychiatric conditions such as autism and some relevant -
An Update on Semantic Dementia: Genetics, Imaging, and Pathology Ramon Landin-Romero1,2,3† , Rachel Tan1,2†, John R
Landin-Romero et al. Alzheimer's Research & Therapy (2016) 8:52 DOI 10.1186/s13195-016-0219-5 REVIEW Open Access An update on semantic dementia: genetics, imaging, and pathology Ramon Landin-Romero1,2,3† , Rachel Tan1,2†, John R. Hodges1,2,3 and Fiona Kumfor1,2,3* Abstract Progressive and relatively circumscribed loss of semantic knowledge, referred to as semantic dementia (SD) which falls under the broader umbrella of frontotemporal dementia, was officially identified as a clinical syndrome less than 50 years ago. Here, we review recent neuroimaging, pathological, and genetic research in SD. From a neuroimaging perspective, SD is characterised by hallmark asymmetrical atrophy of the anterior temporal pole and anterior fusiform gyrus, which is usually left lateralised. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have revealed widespread changes in connectivity, implicating the anterior temporal regions in semantic deficits in SD. Task-related fMRI have also demonstrated the relative preservation of frontal and parietal regions alongside preserved memory performance. In addition, recent longitudinal studies have demonstrated that, with disease progression, atrophy encroaches into the contralateral temporal pole and medial prefrontal cortices, which reflects emerging changes in behaviour and social cognition. Notably, unlike other frontotemporal dementia subtypes, recent research has demonstrated strong clinicopathological concordance in SD, with TDP43 type C as the most common pathological subtype. Moreover, an underlying genetic causeappearstoberelativelyrareinSD,withthemajorityof cases having a sporadic form of the disease. The relatively clear diagnosis, clinical course, and pathological homogeneity of SD make this syndrome a promising target for novel disease-modifying interventions. The development of neuroimaging markers of disease progression at the individual level is an important area of research for future studies to address, in order to assist with this endeavour. -
What Is Semantic Dementia? a Cohort Study of Diagnostic Features and Clinical Boundaries
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION What Is Semantic Dementia? A Cohort Study of Diagnostic Features and Clinical Boundaries Andrew Kertesz, MD; Sarah Jesso, BA; Michal Harciarek, PhD; Mervin Blair, MA; Paul McMonagle, MD Objectives: To describe a large, clinically defined co- tions were frequent in SD (54.1%) but phonological er- hort of patients with semantic dementia (SD) that high- rors were absent, in contrast to progressive nonfluent lights important, sometimes overlooked features and to aphasia with the opposite pattern. All but 3 patients with compare it with similar entities. probable SD questioned the meaning of words. Patients with SD had significantly lower naming and comprehen- Design: Cohort study. sion scores, and their fluency was between progressive nonfluent aphasia and Alzheimer disease or behavioral Setting: A cognitive neurology clinic. frontotemporal dementia. Behavior was abnormal in 94.6% of patients with probable SD. Patients: A population of 48 patients clinically diag- nosed with SD was contrasted with 52 patients with pro- Conclusions: Semantic dementia is distinguishable from gressive nonfluent aphasia, 42 patients with a behav- other presentations of frontotemporal dementia and Alz- ioral variety of frontotemporal dementia, and 105 patients heimer disease, not only by fluent speech and impaired with Alzheimer disease on speech output characteris- tics, comprehension, naming, and repetition subtests of comprehension without loss of episodic memory, syn- the Western Aphasia Battery, the Frontal Behavioral In- tax, and phonology but also by empty, garrulous speech ventory, and other cognitive tests. Neuroimaging was vi- with thematic perseverations, semantic paraphasias, and sually analyzed, and 6 patients with SD had autopsy. poor category fluency. Questioning the meaning of words (eg, “What is steak?”) is an important diagnostic clue not Results: Of 37 patients with probable SD, 48.6% had se- seen in other groups, and behavior change is prevalent. -
Social Behaviour Vs. Psychiatric Features Of
Psychiatria Danubina, 2010; Vol. 22, No. 2, pp 179–182 Case report © Medicinska naklada - Zagreb, Croatia SOCIAL BEHAVIOUR VS. PSYCHIATRIC FEATURES OF FRONTOTEMPORAL DEMENTIA Clinical report of two cases Rajka Marija Liščić1 & Aleš Kogoj2 1Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia 2Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, University Psychiatric Hospital, Ljubljana, Slovenia received: 6.10.2009; revised: 12.1.2010; accepted: 9.2.2010 SUMMARY Behavioural disturbances are prominent in frontotemporal dementia (FTD), a focal, non-Alzheimer type of dementia. Although most patients with FTD present with socially inappropriate behaviour, compulsive-like acts, poor insight and disinhibition, the presence of psychiatric features including delusions, hallucinations, and paranoia can lead to a misclassification of FTD as psychiatric disorder. In the absence of cognitive deficits non-experts fail to recognize these social changes as dementia symptoms. We report two individuals who met current clinical criteria for behavioural or frontal variant FTD (bv-FTD), with the aim of distinguishing between psychotic symptoms and the often bizarre personality and behaviour change found in FTD. Also we review the literature on the noncognitive neuropsyhiatric manifestation of this disorder. Clinical findings presented, and a literature review, indicate that psychotic symptoms are rare in FTD. Better awareness of behavioural symptoms in clinical practice is necessary in order to avoid misdiagnosis of FTD as psychiatric disorder. Key words: bv-frontotemporal dementia - behavioural disturbances - psychotic symptoms * * * * * INTRODUCTION and paranoia) must be distinguished from the often bizarre personality and behaviour changes of FTD. The With baby boomers now reaching late middle age, overlap between FTD and psychotic symptoms exists degenerative diseases are becoming an increasingly and therefore may lead to misleading diagnoses. -
Oxford Handbooks Online
Anomia and Anomic Aphasia Oxford Handbooks Online Anomia and Anomic Aphasia: Implications for Lexical Processing Stacy M. Harnish The Oxford Handbook of Aphasia and Language Disorders (Forthcoming) Edited by Anastasia M. Raymer and Leslie Gonzalez-Rothi Subject: Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience Online Publication Date: Jan DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199772391.013.7 2015 Abstract and Keywords Anomia is a term that describes the inability to retrieve a desired word, and is the most common deficit present across different aphasia syndromes. Anomic aphasia is a specific aphasia syndrome characterized by a primary deficit of word retrieval with relatively spared performance in other language domains, such as auditory comprehension and sentence production. Damage to a number of cognitive and motor systems can produce errors in word retrieval tasks, only subsets of which are language deficits. In the cognitive and neuropsychological underpinnings section, we discuss the major processing steps that occur in lexical retrieval and outline how deficits at each of the stages may produce anomia. The neuroanatomical correlates section will include a review of lesion and neuroimaging studies of language processing to examine anomia and anomia recovery in the acute and chronic stages. The assessment section will highlight how discrepancies in performance between tasks contrasting output modes and input modalities may provide insight into the locus of impairment in anomia. Finally, the treatment section will outline some of the rehabilitation techniques for forms of anomia, and take a closer look at the evidence base for different aspects of treatment. Keywords: Anomia, Anomic aphasia, Word retrieval, Lexical processing Syndrome Description and Unique Characteristics The term anomia refers to the inability to retrieve a desired word, typically in the course of conversational sentence production. -
Psychotic Symptoms in Frontotemporal Dementia: a Diagnostic Dilemma?
International Psychogeriatrics (2015), 27:4, 531–539 C International Psychogeriatric Association 2014. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. doi:10.1017/S1041610214002580 Psychotic symptoms in frontotemporal dementia: a diagnostic dilemma? ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Maria Landqvist Waldö,1 Lars Gustafson,1 Ulla Passant1 and Elisabet Englund2 1Section of Geriatric Psychiatry, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Klinikgatan 22, Lund SE-221 85, Sweden 2Section of Oncology and Pathology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, SE-221 85, Sweden ABSTRACT Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) constitutes a spectrum of neurodegenerative disorders associated with degeneration of, predominantly, -
Semantic Dementia
cortex xxx (2012) 1e10 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/cortex Research report Bringing words back to mind e Improving word production in semantic dementia Sharon A. Savage a,b, Kirrie J. Ballard c, Olivier Piguet a,b and John R. Hodges a,b,* a Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia b Faculty of Medicine, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia c Faculty of Health Sciences, Speech Pathology, University of Sydney, Australia article info abstract Article history: Patients with semantic dementia (SD) have significant impairments in naming and Received 28 February 2012 comprehension, but demonstrate relatively intact attention, everyday memory, and Reviewed 21 June 2012 visuospatial skills. Given these preserved skills, attempts have been made to help re-build Revised 25 June 2012 vocabulary in SD patients, with promising results. Such reports, however, are generally Accepted 19 September 2012 based upon only one or two cases and have employed variable retraining methods. It is Action editor Mike Kopelman thus unclear which elements of practice are crucial to success. Over two studies, we Published online xxx assessed four patients undergoing a word training program, who ranged in severity from mild to severe impairments to semantic knowledge. All four participants showed Keywords: significant improvements in their ability to name trained items, with no changes in Semantic dementia untrained items over the same time period. Improvements were evident within 3 weeks of Cognitive training practice, and could be established from a simple, repetitive practice of word-picture Naming pairing, carried out at the participant’s home. -
Very Early Semantic Dementia with Progressive Temporal Lobe Atrophy an 8-Year Longitudinal Study
OBSERVATION Very Early Semantic Dementia With Progressive Temporal Lobe Atrophy An 8-Year Longitudinal Study Kathrin Czarnecki, MD; Joseph R. Duffy, PhD; Carissa R. Nehl, PhD; Shelley A. Cross, MD; Jennifer R. Molano, MD; Clifford R. Jack Jr, MD; Maria M. Shiung, BA; Keith A. Josephs, MD, MST; Bradley F. Boeve, MD Background: Semantic dementia is a syndrome within mal but subtle left anterior temporal lobe atrophy was the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degenerations char- present. During the follow-up period of 8 years, she de- acterized by fluent progressive aphasia (particularly ano- veloped profound anomia and loss of word meaning as- mia) and loss of word meaning. sociated with progressive left anterior temporal lobe at- rophy, consistent with semantic dementia. In more recent Objective: To report a unique case of very early seman- years, anterograde memory impairment and mild prosop- tic dementia with a slowly progressive course, allowing agnosia evolved in association with left hippocampal at- insights into the early natural history of this disorder. rophy and subtle atrophy in the homologous gyri of the right anterior temporal lobe. She remains functionally in- Design: Case report. dependent despite her current deficits. Setting: A tertiary care center. Conclusions: Early identification of patients who will develop semantic dementia is difficult and might be missed Patient: A 62-year-old woman who presented with with standard clinical, neuropsychological, and struc- “memory loss” complaints. tural neuroimaging evaluations. Recognition of this rela- Main Outcome Measures: Clinical course, neuropsy- tively rare syndrome is important for early diagnosis and chological data, and magnetic resonance imaging results. -
Schizophrenia and Frontotemporal Dementia: Shared Causation?
International Review of Psychiatry, April 2013; 25(2): 168–177 Schizophrenia and frontotemporal dementia: Shared causation? MICHA Ł HARCIAREK 1 , DOLORES MALASPINA2 , TAO SUN3 & ELKHONON GOLDBERG4 1 Division of Clinical Psychology and Neuropsychology, Institute of Psychology, University of Gdansk, Poland, 2 Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA, 3 Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Cornell University Weill Medical College, New York, USA, 4 Department of Neurology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, USA Abstract The relationship between specifi c genes and particular diseases in neuropsychiatry is unclear, and newer studies focus on shared domains of neurobiological and cognitive pathology across different disorders. This paper reviews the evidence for an association between schizophrenia and frontotemporal dementia, including symptom similarity, familial co-morbidity, and neuroanatomical changes. Genetic as well as epigenetic fi ndings from both schizophrenia and frontotemporal demen- tia are also discussed. As a result, we introduce the hypothesis of a shared susceptibility for certain subgroups of schizo- phrenia and frontotemporal dementia. This common causation may involve the same gene(s) at different stages of life: early in schizophrenia and late in frontotemporal dementia. Additionally, we provide a rationale for future research that should emphasize both genetic and cognitive parallels between certain forms of schizophrenia and frontotemporal dementia in a synergistic, coordinated way, placing both in the context of aberrant lateralization patterns. Introduction of what constitutes a ‘ disorder ’ in neuropsychiatry, The relationship between specifi c genes and particu- and invited the revision of, and departure from, tra- lar diseases in neuropsychiatry remains unclear, and ditional diagnostic taxonomies. -
Differentiating Delirium, Dementia, and Depression Elderly Patients Are at High Risk of Mood and Cognitive Impairments Such As Depression, Delirium and Dementia
February 2021 www.nursingcenter.com Differentiating Delirium, Dementia, and Depression Elderly patients are at high risk of mood and cognitive impairments such as depression, delirium and dementia. Delirium is an acute, transient and reversible cause of brain dysfunction, usually triggered by one or more precipitating factors, including infection, medications, pain and dehydration. Dementia is usually subtle in its onset and may not be recognized until it has affected one or more cognitive domains. Depression is characterized by low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in most activities, sleep disturbance, anxiety, and social withdrawal. Delirium, dementia, and depression have overlapping characteristics, and patients may experience more than one of these conditions at the same time. It is essential to differentiate between these conditions, particularly if delirium is present, because this is an acute medical emergency that requires rapid assessment and management. Nurses in both outpatient and hospital settings can have a significant role in the identification, assessment and management of patients with dementia, delirium and depression. Dementia Signs and Symptoms Dementia is the most common disorder of cognition, and is characterized by a decline in one or more of these cognitive domains (Larson, 2019): • Memory (remote memories versus recent memories) • Language (word retrieval, comprehension) • Learning new skills (following linear instructions, with ability to repeat skills) • Executive function (ability to shop, do laundry, write a check) • Complex attention (completing multi-step tasks) • Social cognition (remembering family connections, names) • Perceptual-motor skills (dressing, bathing) The decline in function must not be attributable to other organic disease, must not be due to an episode of delirium, and must be severe enough to interfere with independence or daily functioning.