DOCSLIB.ORG

SM QM-FT-451 Sydney Metro Report Template

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SM QM-FT-451 Sydney Metro Report Template Station Design and Precinct Plan – Central Station City & Southwest Chatswood to Sydenham project Document Number: SMCSWCSM-LOR-SMC-EM-PLN-000012 Sydney Metro Author/ Revision Brief reason Revision Status Name/ position/ company Reviewer/ Signature date for update Approver David Parkinson Principal Consultant (EcoQuest Environmental) John Prentice Duncan Ritchie Engineering and 1 12/02/19 Draft Draft for review Project Principal Architect Systems Manager Woods Bagot Laing O’Rourke Meghan Nordeck Senior Associate Woods Bagot Meghan Nordeck Senior Associate Woods Bagot 2 09/10/19 Draft Nicole Waterman Design & Engineering Manager Laing O’Rourke Duncan Ritchie Responses to Stakeholder Engineering and comments Hussain Nilar Systems Manager register Environmental Advisor Laing O’Rourke 3 11/11/19 Draft Laing O’Rourke Sarah Stephen Snr Stakeholder & Public Affairs Manager Laing O’Rourke Meghan Nordeck Response to Senior Associate Woods Bagot feedback 08/01/20 Draft following Nicole Waterman community and City of Sydney Design & Engineering Manager consultation. Laing O’Rourke Duncan Ritchie Engineering and 4 Systems Manager Hussain Nilar Laing O’Rourke Updates to Environmental Advisor SDPP following Laing O’Rourke 04/02/20 Draft multiple DRP presentations/co nsultation. Sarah Stephen Snr Stakeholder & Public Affairs Manager Laing O’Rourke Meghan Nordeck Senior Associate Woods Bagot DPIE 05/02/20 first Draft review Nicole Waterman Design & Engineering Manager Laing O’Rourke Duncan Ritchie DPIE Engineering and 5 Second 27/02/20 Draft Systems Manager review Hussain Nilar Laing O’Rourke Environmental Advisor DPIE Laing O’Rourke 31/03/20 Third Final review Sarah Stephen Snr Stakeholder & Public Affairs Manager Laing O’Rourke Page 2 of 141 CSM-SMD-GEN-SMCSWCSM-SMD-CSM-SMD-GEN-001896-20200330_SDPP DPIE Review 3.docx Sydney Metro Table of Contents Glossary .............................................................................................................................. 5 Executive summary ............................................................................................................ 6 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Station Design and Precinct Plan ....................................... 8 Project overview ........................................................................................ 9 Scope of this Station Design and Precinct Plan ....................................... 10 Status of this Station Design and Precinct Plan ....................................... 13 Structure of the Station Design and Precinct Plan .................................... 13 Compliance with the Conditions of Approval ............................................ 14 2. Design development process ............................................................................. 17 3. Collaboration and consultation .......................................................................... 19 Consultation during preparation of the Station Design and Precinct Plan . 21 Review by the Design Review Panel ........................................................ 28 4. Design objectives, principles and standards .................................................... 29 Project design objectives ......................................................................... 29 Maximising amenity of public spaces and permeability around station entrances ................................................................................................. 36 Local environmental, heritage and place making values .......................... 37 Urban design context ............................................................................... 40 Community safety, amenity and privacy ................................................... 43 Sustainable design and maintenance ...................................................... 47 Minimising the project footprint ................................................................ 47 Relevant standards and guidelines .......................................................... 48 5. Design opportunities........................................................................................... 49 Opportunities for landscaping and building design to mitigate visual impacts .................................................................................................... 49 Public art selection and collaboration activities ........................................ 54 Opportunities identified in the Heritage Interpretation Strategy and draft Heritage Interpretation Plan ..................................................................... 56 Opportunities for incorporating salvaged historic and artistic elements .... 60 6. Details of the Station Design and Precinct Plan ............................................... 63 Station Element and design features ....................................................... 63 Precinct (public realm) plan ..................................................................... 72 Statement of integrated urban design and place making outcome ........... 74 7. Implementation .................................................................................................... 75 Timing ...................................................................................................... 75 Monitoring and maintenance of landscaping ............................................ 75 Interchange Access Plan – Delivery and Implementation Program .......... 76 8. Visual impact assessment .................................................................................. 77 Visual impact assessment methodology .................................................. 80 8.1.1. Landscape impact assessment ................................................. 80 8.1.2. Visual impact assessment ......................................................... 81 Page 3 of 141 CSM-SMD-GEN-SMCSWCSM-SMD-CSM-SMD-GEN-001896-20200330_SDPP DPIE Review 3.docx Sydney Metro 8.1.3. CSM visual impacts - daytime ................................................... 83 8.1.4. CSM visual impacts – night-time ............................................. 101 8.1.5. CSM landscape impacts ......................................................... 101 Appendix A Community Feedback Register .......................................................... 103 Appendix B How feedback from consultation has been addressed ..................... 109 Appendix C Evidence of review by the Design Review Panel ............................... 122 Appendix D Qualifications and Experience of the key author(s) who prepared this plan 133 Appendix E – Government Stakeholder Correspondence ........................................... 140 Page 4 of 141 CSM-SMD-GEN-SMCSWCSM-SMD-CSM-SMD-GEN-001896-20200330_SDPP DPIE Review 3.docx Sydney Metro Glossary This plan uses the following terms, abbreviations and definitions: Table 1: Terms and definitions Acronym/Term Definition CCD Customer Centred Design CPTED Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design CSM Works Central Station Main Works CSR Combined Services Route DRP Design Review Panel DPIE Department of Planning, Industry and Environment EIS Environmental Impact Statement ESR Eastern Suburbs Railway GBCA Green Building Council of Australia GRC Glass Reinforced Concrete HIP Heritage Interpretation Plan IS Infrastructure Sustainability ISCA Infrastructure Sustainability Council of Australia SCO Sydney Coordination Office (division of Transport for NSW) SLR Sydney Light Rail (CBD and South East Light Rail) SDPP Station Design and Precinct Plan SM Sydney Metro SPIR Submissions and Preferred Infrastructure Report SSI State Significant Infrastructure SYAB Sydney Yard Access Bridge TfNSW Transport for NSW WSUD Water Sensitive Urban Design Page 5 of 141 CSM-SMD-GEN-SMCSWCSM-SMD-CSM-SMD-GEN-001896-20200330_SDPP DPIE Review 3.docx Sydney Metro Executive summary This Station Design and Precinct Plan (SDPP) has been prepared to fulfil Condition E101 of the Chatswood to Sydenham project approval SSI 15_7400 for the Metro Station at Central Station. Condition E101 requires that: Before commencement of permanent built surface works and/or landscaping, the Proponent must prepare Station Design and Precinct Plans (SDPP) for each station. The SDPP must be prepared by a suitably qualified and experienced person(s), in collaboration and consultation with relevant stakeholders including but not limited to relevant council(s), the Department, and the local community. The SDPP(s) must present an integrated urban and place making outcome for each station or end state element. The SDPP(s) must be approved by the Secretary following review by the DRP and before commencement of permanent aboveground work.… … Elements covered by the SDPP(s) must be complete no later than the commencement of operation of the Sydney Metro to paid services, unless otherwise agreed with the Secretary. The Condition notes that the SDPP may be submitted in stages to address the building and landscaping elements of the project. This SDPP is for the Central Station Metro as defined in section 1.3. This SDPP has been prepared by the Lead Contractor for the Central Station Main Works project, Laing O’Rourke Australia, supported by specialist advisors EcoQuest Environmental and architects, Woods Bagot and John McAslan + Partners. Separate SDPPs have been or are being developed for all other stations on the Sydney Metro City & Southwest alignment. The scope of the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The City of Sydney
    The City of Sydney City Planning, Urban Design and Planning, CVUT. Seminar Work by Phoebe Ford. LOCATION The City of Sydney, by M.S. Hill, 1888. State Library of New South Wales. Regional Relations The New South Wales Government conceptualises Sydney as ‘a city of cities’ comprising: The Central Business District (CBD) which is within the City of Sydney Local Government Area (LGA), the topic of my presentation, and North Sydney, which make up ‘Global Sydney’, and the regional cities of Parramatta, Liverpool and Penrith. This planning concept applies the Marchetti principle which aims to create a fair and efficient city which offers jobs closer to homes, less travel time and less reliance on a single CBD to generate employment. The concept is that cities should be supported by major and specialized centres which concentrate housing, commercial activity and local services within a transport and economic network. Walking catchment centres along rail and public transport corridors ‘One-hour Cities’ of the Greater Metropolitan Region of Sydney Sydney’s sub-regions and local government areas Inner Sydney Regional Context City of Sydney Local Government Area Importance Within Broader Context of the Settlements Network • Over the last 20 years, ‘the Global Economic Corridor’ - the concentration of jobs and infrastructure from Macquarie Park through Chatswood, St Leonards, North Sydney and the CBD to Sydney Airport and Port Botany- has emerged as a feature of Sydney and Australia's economy. • The corridor has been built on the benefits that businesses involved in areas such as finance, legal services, information technology, engineering and marketing have derived from being near to each other and to transport infrastructure such as the airport.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Metro City and Southwest - Chatswood to Sydenham SSI 7400
    STATE SIGNIFICANT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSESSMENT: Sydney Metro City and Southwest - Chatswood to Sydenham SSI 7400 Environmental Assessment Report under Section 115ZA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 December 2016 Sydney Metro City and Southwest – Chatswood to Sydenham Environmental Assessment Report SSI 7400 Cover Photograph: Crows Nest Station Transport for NSW © Crown copyright 2016 Published December 2016 NSW Department of Planning & Environment www.planning.nsw.gov.au Disclaimer: While every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that this document is correct at the time of publication, the State of New South Wales, its agents and employees, disclaim any and all liability to any person in respect of anything or the consequences of anything done or omitted to be done in reliance upon the whole or any part of this document. NSW Government i Department of Planning & Environment Sydney Metro City and Southwest – Chatswood to Sydenham Environmental Assessment Report SSI 7400 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Proposal Transport for NSW (the Proponent) proposes to construct the Sydney Metro City and Southwest - Chatswood to Sydenham proposal (the project), which forms part of a future modern high capacity rail network, which also includes Sydney Metro Northwest (currently under construction) and the proposed Sydenham to Bankstown upgrade project. The project is primarily an underground metro rail line, 16.5 kilometres in length, between Chatswood Station and just north of Sydenham Station. New metro stations would be provided at Crows Nest, Victoria Cross, Barangaroo, Martin Place, Pitt Street and Waterloo; and new underground platforms at Central. The project facilitates and responds to Sydney’s forecast population and economic growth and the existing and emerging constraints on the existing rail network.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 4 Environmental Impact Statement Cbd Andsoutheast Lightrailproject
    CBD AND SOUTH EAST LIGHT RAIL PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT VOLUME 4 Technical papers ASSESSMENT HERITAGE IMPACT IMPACT HERITAGE TECHNICAL PAPER 5: TECHNICAL PAPER CBD and South East Light Rail Heritage Impact Assessment Report prepared for Parsons Brinckerhoff on behalf of Transport for NSW November 2013 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled CBD and South East Light Rail—Heritage Impact Assessment, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 12-0489 1 Report 7 November 2013 Contents Page Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... i Scope ............................................................................................................................................................... i Key Findings .................................................................................................................................................... i Mitigation Measures ...................................................................................................................................... iii 1.0 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Interchange Access Plan – Central Station October 2020 Version 22 Issue Purpose: Sydney Metro Website – CSSI Coa E92 Approved Version Contents
    Interchange Access Plan – Central Station October 2020 Version 22 Issue Purpose: Sydney Metro Website – CSSI CoA E92 Approved Version Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................1 7.0 Central Station - interchange and 1.1 Sydney Metro .........................................................................1 transfer requirements overview ................ 20 1.2 Sydney Metro City & Southwest objectives ..............1 7.1 Walking interchange and transfer requirements ...21 1.3 Interchange Access Plan ..................................................1 7.2 Cycling interchange and transfer requirements ..28 1.4 Purpose of Plan ...................................................................1 7.3 Train interchange and transfer requirements ...... 29 7.4 Light rail interchange and transfer 2.0 Interchange and transfer planning .......2 requirements ........................................................................... 34 2.1 Customer-centred design ............................................... 2 7.5 Bus interchange and transfer requirements ........ 36 2.2 Sydney Metro customer principles............................. 2 7.6 Coach interchange and transfer requirements ... 38 2.3 An integrated customer journey .................................3 7.7 Vehicle drop-off interchange and 2.4 Interchange functionality and role .............................3 transfer requirements ..........................................................40 2.5 Modal hierarchy .................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Impact Statement Accompanies a Technical Package to Inform the Preparation of a Self-Repealing SEPP for the Western Gateway Sub-Precinct
    HERITAGE IMPACT STATEMENT Former Inwards Parcels Shed Nos 8–10 Lee Street, Sydney October 2019 | J3201 Level 19, 100 William Street, Sydney, NSW 2011 Phone: (02) 8076 5317 1 Executive Summary This Heritage Impact Statement accompanies a technical package to inform the preparation of a self-repealing SEPP for the Western Gateway Sub-precinct. The SEPP will amend the Sydney Local Environmental Plan 2012 (SLEP 2012) changing the building height and floor space ratio development standards and land use zoning for the part of Lot 118 in DP 1078271 which apply to the site at 8-10 Lee Street, Haymarket (Block A or the Site). Block A is within the Western Gateway Precinct, which is a sub precinct of the Central State Significant Precinct (Central SSP), which was declared by the NSW Government on 12 July 2019. The Western Gateway sub-precinct will form the first stage of rezoning for the Central Precinct. The Planning Statements will inform the preparation of a self-repealing SEPP for the Western Gateway Sub-precinct including the amendments outlined in the documentation prepared for Block A. The intended outcome of the self-repealing SEPP is to create Australia’s first ‘Innovation Precinct’ adjacent to Sydney’s Central Railway Station, by introducing new built form controls for Block A to support the development of an iconic commercial office tower for the new global headquarters of Atlassian (who would anchor, grow and nurture the Precinct), a re- imagined improved YHA tourism accommodation the adaptive re-use of the Former Inwards Parcels Shed, and a range of spaces for local and emerging tech/start-up companies to thrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Gateway Public Domain Strategy
    WESTERN GATEWAY SUB-PRECINCT PUBLIC DOMAIN STRATEGY Prepared by Hassell + Aspect Studios for Dexus / Frasers / Atlassian + TfNSW May 2020 Acknowledgement of Country The Western Gateway sub-precinct applicants respectfully acknowledges the Traditional Owners and custodians of the land within Central Precinct, the Gadigal of the Eora Nation, and recognises the importance of this place to all Aboriginal people. The Western Gateway sub-precinct applicants pay their respect to Elders past, present and emerging. 2 Western Gateway Sub-precinct Public Domain Strategy Western Gateway The site has a unique character that draws on its location within Sydney’s Central Station precinct, the legacy of the station heritage and cultural values, and its fusion with the topography of the adjacent landform and landscape conditions. The public domain will draw on this distinctive local character, and explore opportunities to create authentic places grounded by the relationships between circulation, landscape features and architecture to enrich this significant and unique part of the city. 3 INTRODUCTION Public Domain Strategy The Public Domain Strategy defines a unified strategy for the public domain for the Western Gateway sub-precinct. The strategy forms part of a response to submissions that have been received. The Public Domain Strategy demonstrates a commitment to creating a place that is wholly connected to the wider Central Precinct. The strategy represents a partnership of interested parties to ensure a precinct that is high quality, activated and
    [Show full text]
  • Ssh.Com.Au Phone Lyn 0400 008 338
    LOCAL ELECTION 2016 SCULPTURES FROM THE SEA CITY OF SYDNEY – YOUR CANDIDATES – pages 6-7 THE REVIEW – pages 11-14 NUMBER ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY-ONE ~ SEPTEMBER ’16 ~ CIRCULATION 22,000 ~ALEXANDRIA BEACONSFIELD CHIPPENDALE DARLINGTON ERSKINEVILLE EVELEIGH GLEBE KINGS CROSS NEWTOWN PADDINGTON REDFERN SURRY HILLS WATERLOO WOOLLOOMOOLOO ZETLAND Lessons of history – local connections LYN & GEOFF TURNBULL WE recently spent a month in southern Africa. It was just the right mix of a two-week camping safari and travel by ourselves. We had the big animal photography, amazing scenery, travel with a good friend from uni days, as well as encounters with people from lots of different cultural groups. For us it was not only a break from our daily life in Redfern but also an opportunity to see some similarities and contrasts between our community and those in very different places. We visited the Cradle of Humankind world heritage site, north of Johannesburg where our common human ancestors lived more than three million years ago. We climbed through one of the Sterkfontein Caves, where the fossil remains of a human ancestor Australopithecus africanus were found in 1947. The visitors’ centre Maropeng, which means “returning to the place of origin” in Setswana, the main local indigenous language, is an engaging mix of theme park ride and museum. You travel down a dark bumpy tunnel in an inflatable raft back in time to the Big Bang, to emerge into a large light-filled interactive museum with a similar feel to the Questacon National Science and Technology Centre in Canberra. It explores genetic diversity and evolution linking the Out of Africa story of humanity with the fossil finds in this archeologically rich part of South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Justification Report
    BLOCK C WESTERN GATEWAY SUB-PRECINCT PLANNING JUSTIFICATION REPORT 27 NOVEMBER 2020 P0009310 FINAL PREPARED FOR TOGA GROUP URBIS STAFF RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS REPORT WERE: Director John Wynne Associate Director Ashleigh Ryan Consultant Liz Jones Project Code P0009310 Report Number Final © Urbis Pty Ltd ABN 50 105 256 228 All Rights Reserved. No material may be reproduced without prior permission. You must read the important disclaimer appearing within the body of this report. urbis.com.au CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. The Site ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2. Project Overview .................................................................................................................. 2 1.3. Project Objectives ................................................................................................................ 3 1.4. Strategic Need ..................................................................................................................... 3 1.5. Structure of Report ............................................................................................................... 4 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Sydney
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Metro: Central Station Main Works – Station Box and Sydney Yards
    Sydney Metro: Archaeological Method Statement Sydney Metro: Central Station Main Works – Station Box and Sydney Yards Archaeological Method Statement Report to Laing O’Rourke August 2018 Page i Central Station Main Works – Station Box and Sydney Yards Archaeological Method Statement Document history and status Revision Date issued Reviewed by Approved by Date approved Revision type 1 30 July 2018 SW, IS, JW SW, IS, JW 30 July 2018 First draft 2 30 July 2018 CM SW 1 August 2018 Second draft 3 1 August SW, IS SW 3 August 2018 Final 2018 4 16 August FB SW, IS 16 August 2018 Final with 2018 responses to HD Printed: 17/08/2018 15:59 Last saved: 17/08/2018 15:59 Central Station Main Works Station Box and Sydeny Yards- Archaeological File name: Method Statement 1082018 Project name: Sydney Metro: Central Station Main Works Author: Shona Lindsay, Jessica Horton, Jenny Winnett, Iain Stuart, Sandra Wallace Project manager: Shona Lindsay Central Station Main Works – Station Box and Sydeny Yards: Archaeological Name of document: Method Statement Name of organisation: Artefact Heritage Document version: Final © Artefact Heritage Services This document is and shall remain the property of Artefact Heritage Services. This document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of the Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. Disclaimer: Artefact Heritage Services has completed this document in accordance with the relevant federal, state and local legislation and current industry best practice. The company accepts no liability for any damages or loss incurred as a result of reliance placed upon the document content or for any purpose other than that for which it was intended.
    [Show full text]
  • Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Report
    Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Report ATLASSIAN CENTRAL Atlassian − CONFIDENTIAL Revision: 4.0 – SSDA submission Issued: 1 October 2020 1 INTRODUCTION 2 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITE 4 3 SITE AND SURROUNDING CONTEXT 6 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 7 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 5.1 Key Recommendations 8 5.2 Precinct Assessment 8 5.3 Design Assessment 8 5.4 Other Security Works 8 5.5 Key Areas of Consideration 9 5.6 Security Design Process and Methodology 9 5.7 CPTED Principles 10 5.8 Stakeholder Engagement 10 6 CRIME CONTEXT 11 6.1 Overview and Summary 11 6.2 Crime Assessment and Treatment Approach 11 7 DESIGN ASSESSMENT 15 7.1 Precinct Assessment 15 7.2 Basement Levels 19 7.3 Public Areas 21 7.4 YHA Typical Floor 24 7.5 Tower Floors 24 7.6 Tower Roof Levels 26 8 DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 29 8.1 Basement 29 8.2 Public Areas 29 8.3 YHA 29 8.4 Tower Levels 30 8.5 Roof Levels 30 9 APPENDIX A – CRIME DEFINITIONS 31 10 GLOSSARY 32 10.1 GLOSSARY OF KEY TERMS 32 10.2 ABBREVIATIONS 32 Atlassian Central | Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Report 1 of 34 SSDA submission | 4.0 | 1-Oct-20 | \\ndy.group\syd\w\S253xx\S25327\007\S-\24_Reports\rp200429s0001 1 INTRODUCTION Norman Disney & Young (NDY) has been commissioned by Atlassian (the Applicant) to prepare this report in accordance with the technical requirements of the Secretary’s Environmental Assessment Requirements (SEARs), and in support of the SSD-10405 for a commercial and hotel development above the Former Inwards Parcel Shed at 8 – 10 Lee Street, Haymarket.
    [Show full text]
  • Planes, Trains & Automobiles
    may-june 2012 north-west rail link Discussing the state’s major rail initiative interview Gold Medallist 2012, Lawrence Nield urban renewal Newcastle, Sydney, Bordeaux mass transit A survey of key transport projects Planes, trains & automobiles Will an integrated transport system remain the missing piece of Sydney’s planning puzzle? NORTH SYDNEY WALSH BAY DAWES POINT MILLERS POINT GARDEN ISLAND THE ROCKS DARLING HARBOUR CIRCULAR QUAY POTTS POINT WYNYARD WOOLLOOMOOLOO COCKLE BAY ELIZABETH BAY PYRMONT TOWN HALL EAST SYDNEY KINGS CROSS ROZELLE RUSHCUTTERS BAY DARLINGHURST LEICHHARDT CHINATOWN EDGECLIFF CITY CENTRE PADDINGTON ULTIMO RAILWAY FOREST LODGE SQUARE CENTRAL TAYLOR SQUARE CAMPERDOWN BROADWAY CITY SOUTH SURRY HILLS CHIPPENDALE N DARLINGTON REDFERN BONDI JUNCTION MOORE PARK WATERLOO NEWTOWN ERSKINEVILLE CENTENNIAL PARK UNSW SYDNEY PARK GREEN SQUARE ST PETERS ZETLAND ALEXANDRIA BEACONSFIELD MASCOT editor Peter Salhani [email protected] editorial Committee Chair Contents Joe Agius [email protected] art direction and design President’s message Jamie Carroll and Ersen Sen 02 leadinghand.com.au 23. Copy editor Editorial Monique Pasilow 03 managing editor Roslyn Irons News and views from around the NSW Chapter advertising 04 [email protected] subscriptions (annual) Institute advocacy on transport and planning Six issues $60, students $40 06 reviews Built Environment Committee [email protected] 24. editorial & advertising office North–West Rail Link conversation: Tusculum, 3 Manning Street Kim Crestani, Tom Gellibrand, John Richardson, Potts Point NSW 2011 on the cover 08 (02) 9246 4055 City of Sydney’s proposed regional and Ross de la Motte bicycle network. Usage figures page 31. ISSN 0813-748X image: Courtesy, City of Sydney Published six times a year, North–West frontier Bob Meyer Architecture Bulletin is the journal of 14 the Australian Institute of Architects, NSW Chapter (ACN 000 023 012).
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Strategic Vision for the Central State Significant Precinct (SSP) Department of Planning, Industry and Environment
    Draft Strategic Vision for the Central State Significant Precinct (SSP) Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Submission ID: 68186 Number: 1 Confidentiality Requested:Yes Date Received: 16/10/2019 9:57:00 AM From: Withheld Submission: I think this area should become an extension of the City, with lots more jobs based around Central. It is already a great transportation hub and it should live up to its name... Central, the real centre of Sydney with high density of offices, entertainment (which is currently missing), shopping and food / drinks places. There is currently so much ‘dead’ space around Central Station, unused. It also needs better pedestrian connections from chippendale to surry hills. It could be the new high rise hub, with hieghts of buildings finally able to compete with Melbourne! NSW Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Draft Strategic Vision for the Central State Significant Precinct (SSP) Department of Planning, Industry and Environment Submission ID: 68191 Number: 2 Confidentiality Requested:No Date Received: 16/10/2019 1:29:00 PM From: Cliff Ho [email protected] Submission: Hi we run the largest coworking and incubator program in Sydney Central. We have over 450 members and would love the opportunity to share our ideas and give you a tour of our space to help shape the precinct. We would also be interested in helping run part of the precincts coworking space. Open to a tradi- tional lease or even a management agreement. At The Commons we help create jobs and build amazing communities, so would love to meet to discuss more.
    [Show full text]