DOCSLIB.ORG

Analysis of Bottlenecks in Railway Connections

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Analysis of Bottlenecks in Railway Connections BOTTLENECK ANALYSIS Version: 2 Date: 2013-05-18 Responsible partner: LP Contributing partners: PP1, PP2, PP3, PP4, PP5, PP6, PP7, PP8, 10%PP1&2 SETA - SOUTH EAST TRANSPORT AXIS Bottleneck analysis Table of contents 1 Approach to bottleneck analysis ...................................................................... 8 1.1 The Project area; SETA Main Line, Railway sections .......................................... 10 1.2 Bottleneck analysis within the SETA process ................................................... 12 1.3 Existing and future railway facilities and transport conditions for passenger and freight ................................................................................................ 13 1.4 Existing and future situation of metropolitan transport ...................................... 13 1.5 Existing and future terminal facilities ........................................................... 14 1.6 Existing and future seaport facilities and port hinterland connections ..................... 14 1.7 Structure of the report............................................................................. 14 2 Results of bottleneck analysis for the existing situation per railway section .............. 16 2.1 Data to be used for analysis ....................................................................... 16 2.2 Austrian section ..................................................................................... 17 2.2.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 17 2.2.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 20 2.2.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 22 2.3 Slovakian section.................................................................................... 25 2.3.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 25 2.3.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 27 2.3.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 28 2.4 Hungarian section ................................................................................... 30 2.4.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 30 2.4.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 32 2.4.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 33 2.5 Croatian section ..................................................................................... 35 2.5.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 35 2.5.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 37 2.5.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 40 2.6 Slovenian section ................................................................................... 41 2.6.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 41 2.6.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 42 2.6.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 43 2.7 Italian section ....................................................................................... 44 2.7.1 Railway infrastructure ......................................................................... 44 2.7.2 Current railway traffic ......................................................................... 47 2.7.3 Safety and interoperability .................................................................... 50 2 / 127 SETA - SOUTH EAST TRANSPORT AXIS Bottleneck analysis 3 Existing metropolitan bottlenecks .................................................................. 51 3.1 Zagreb (HR) .......................................................................................... 51 3.2 Vienna (AT) .......................................................................................... 53 3.3 Bratislava (SK) ....................................................................................... 57 4 Result of bottleneck analysis for the existing port-hinterland connections ................ 58 4.1 Port of Rijeka (HR) ................................................................................. 59 4.1.1 Existing capacities of the seaport ............................................................ 59 4.1.2 Offered sea connections (links) for freight traffic in the ports .......................... 63 4.1.3 Existing port-hinterland connections ........................................................ 63 4.2 Port of Koper (SLO) ................................................................................. 66 4.2.1 Existing capacities of the seaport ............................................................ 66 4.2.2 Offered sea connections (links) for freight traffic in the ports .......................... 70 4.2.3 Existing port-hinterland connections ........................................................ 74 4.3 Port of Monfalcone (IT) ............................................................................ 76 4.3.1 Existing capacities of the seaport ............................................................ 76 4.3.2 Offered sea connections (links) for freight traffic in the ports .......................... 78 4.3.3 Existing port-hinterland connections ........................................................ 78 5 Planned measures and deriving additional measures to reduce existing railway bottlenecks ............................................................................................. 79 5.1 The foreseen measures of the existing development plans (Reference Case) ............. 79 5.1.1 Infrastructural measures (speed, tracks, traction) ........................................ 79 5.1.2 Improvement of railway terminals ........................................................... 88 5.1.3 Improvement of interoperability (safety and interoperability) .......................... 93 5.1.4 Impact of development measures on railway travel time and capacity ................ 94 5.2 Additional measures of improvement .......................................................... 100 5.3 Measures to reduce metropolitan railway bottlenecks ...................................... 105 5.3.1 The impact of the new Vienna Central Station on the SETA railway operation program for passenger and freight ......................................................... 105 5.3.2 The impact of the new Zagreb railway bypass on the SETA railway operation program for passenger and freight ......................................................... 105 6 Measures to reduce bottlenecks on port - hinterland connections ......................... 108 6.1 Rijeka ............................................................................................... 108 6.1.1 Measures foreseen by the national ports development plans .......................... 108 6.1.2 Port – hinterland connections ............................................................... 110 6.2 Koper ............................................................................................... 113 6.2.1 Measures foreseen by the national ports development plans .......................... 113 6.2.2 Port – hinterland connections ............................................................... 115 6.3 Monfalcone......................................................................................... 116 6.4 Summary ........................................................................................... 117 7 Scenarios of future development of the SETA Corridor ....................................... 119 3 / 127 SETA - SOUTH EAST TRANSPORT AXIS Bottleneck analysis 7.1 SETA railway network 2015 considering the national plans and the proposed additional measures and the transport conditions in the complementary European railway network ................................................................................... 121 7.2 SETA Railway network and transport conditions 2020 (considering national plans and additional measures and the transport conditions in the complementary European railway network ................................................................................... 123 7.3 SETA Railway network and transport conditions 2030 (considering national plans and additional measures) and the transport conditions in the complementary European railway network ................................................................................... 125 4 / 127 SETA - SOUTH EAST TRANSPORT AXIS Bottleneck analysis List of tables Table 1: Railway sections covered by the SETA Corridor ................................................ 11 Table 2: Track classes in Austria ............................................................................ 18 Table 3: Austria - Waiting time, travel time, speed per section ....................................... 21 Table 4: Existing intermodal terminals in Slovakian part of SETA corridor ........................... 26 Table 5: Terminals in development in Slovakian part of SETA corridor ............................... 26 Table 6: Speed (design/average) of Slovakian part of SETA corridor .................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Act Cciii of 2011 on the Elections of Members Of
    Strasbourg, 15 March 2012 CDL-REF(2012)003 Opinion No. 662 / 2012 Engl. only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) ACT CCIII OF 2011 ON THE ELECTIONS OF MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF HUNGARY This document will not be distributed at the meeting. Please bring this copy. www.venice.coe.int CDL-REF(2012)003 - 2 - The Parliament - relying on Hungary’s legislative traditions based on popular representation; - guaranteeing that in Hungary the source of public power shall be the people, which shall pri- marily exercise its power through its elected representatives in elections which shall ensure the free expression of the will of voters; - ensuring the right of voters to universal and equal suffrage as well as to direct and secret bal- lot; - considering that political parties shall contribute to creating and expressing the will of the peo- ple; - recognising that the nationalities living in Hungary shall be constituent parts of the State and shall have the right ensured by the Fundamental Law to take part in the work of Parliament; - guaranteeing furthermore that Hungarian citizens living beyond the borders of Hungary shall be a part of the political community; in order to enforce the Fundamental Law, pursuant to Article XXIII, Subsections (1), (4) and (6), and to Article 2, Subsections (1) and (2) of the Fundamental Law, hereby passes the following Act on the substantive rules for the elections of Hungary’s Members of Parliament: 1. Interpretive provisions Section 1 For the purposes of this Act: Residence: the residence defined by the Act on the Registration of the Personal Data and Resi- dence of Citizens; in the case of citizens without residence, their current addresses.
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Program "Recovery of Free Port of Trieste"
    Presidency of the International Commission for the Free Port of Trieste (ICFPT) ComitatoPLT c/o Helmproject di Marcus Donato Casella Postale 2013/a 34151 Trieste Trieste, June 29, 2012 FUNDING PROGRAM "RECOVERY OF FREE PORT OF TRIESTE" Program addressed to investors interested in financing the reconstruction and development of the Free Port of Trieste and the infrastructures related to it. Index: Chapter I, page 2: PRESENTATION OF PROPOSING INSTITUTION Chapter II, page 3: INSTRUMENT AND PURPOSES OF FUNDING Chapter III, page 3: AMOUNT OF FUNDING Chapter IV, page 3: AMORTIZATION OF THE FUNDING Chapter V, page 3: TIMING OF EXECUTION OF THE WORKS Chapter VI, page 4: ADMINISTRATION OF THE COMMON FUND Chapter VII, page 4: HEADQUARTERS AND SUPPORT BANK OF THE COMMON FUND Chapter VIII, page 5: GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Chapter IX, page 8: POSSIBILITY OF USE AND DESCRIPTION OF THE PORT Chapter X, page 9: BRIEF HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION Chapter XI, page 10: THE FUTURE FREE PORT OF TRIESTE Section: 1. MAPS, page 10 2. OLD PORT (EMPORIUM port) offshore, page 13 3. RIVE e SACCHETTA (CABOTAGE/ NAUTICAL port) offshore, page 16 4. RIVE e SACCHETTA (CABOTAGE/ NAUTICAL port) customs, page 17 5. COMMERCIAL PORT offshore, page 18 6. INDUSTRIAL PORT offshore, page 19 7. INNER HARBOR offshore, page 20 Acronyms: FTT = Free Territory of Trieste 1 FPT = Free Port of Trieste ICFPT = International Commission of the FPT UN = United Nations UNSC = United Nations Security Council Annex VI = Permanent Statute of the Free Territory of Trieste Annex VII = Instrument for the
    [Show full text]
  • Short Version of Congestion Charging Study.Pdf
    Short version of conges- tion charging study ELAN Deliverable No. 3.2-D1 Project acronym: ELAN Project full title: Mobilising citizens for vital cities Grant Agreement No.: ELANTREN/FP7TR/218954/”ELAN” Measure: 3.2-ZAG Study of congestion charging and dialogue on pricing Authors: Marko Slavulj, Ivan Dadić, Marko Ševrović Co-authors: Stanislav Pavlin, Davor Brčić, Marko Šoštarić Final version 14 February 2012 CIVITAS-ELAN Deliverable 3.2-D1 ELAN Deliverable no. 3.2-D1 Date / Version 14/02/2012 / Final Dissemination level public Work Package WP3 Authors Marko Slavulj, Ivan Dadić, Marko Ševrović Co-authors StanislavPavlin, Davor Brčić, Marko Šoštarić File Name 3.2 - D1 - Short version of congestion charging study.pdf Keywords General Workpackage links WP1 Alternative fuels WP7 Energy-efficient x CIVITAS & clean vehicles freight logistics WP2 Collective WP8 Transport telemat- x ELAN Project transport & intermodal ics integration WP3 Demand man- WP9 Project coordination x agement WP4 Influencing travel WP10 Project manage- behaviour ment WP5 Safety, security & WP11 Research and health Technological Develop- ment WP6 Innovative mo- WP12 Impact and pro- bility services cess evaluation WP13 Dissemination, citizens’ engagement, training and knowledge transfer Document history Date Person Action Status1 Circulation2 12/01/2012 Marko Slavulj Preparation of draft version Draft PM 08/02/2012 Marcel Braun Proof-reading and commenting of draft Draft ML 14/02/12 Marko Slavulj Preparing final version Final PM, PC 1 Status:Draft, Final, Approved, Submitted 2 Circulation: PC = Project Coordinator; PM = Project Manager; SC = Site Coordinators; EM = Evaluation Manager; DM = Dis- semination Manager; SEM = Site Evaluation Managers; SDM = Site Dissemination Managers; SCo = Scientific Coordinator, P = partners, ML = Measure Leaders 2 CONTENT 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beauty and Diversity of North-East Adriatic Wetlands
    THE BEAUTY AND DIVERSITY OF NORTH-EAST ADRIATIC WETLANDS WETLANDS OF THE NORTH-EAST ADRIATIC The wetlands of the North Adriatic were created over the last 20,000 years as the sea level rose and dropped again, the sea water gradually flooding flat land along the sea.These processes are still at work today as are the processes of rivers depositing sediments that helped build the stretch of sandy shores marking the outer limit of the existing North Adriatic lagoon areas. The wetlands of the North-East Adriatic are of key importance for the conservation of threatened animal and plant species and biodiversity on the national and international levels. The Ramsar Convention defines wetlands as areas of marsh, fen, peatland or water, whether natural or artificial, permanent or temporary, with water that is static or flowing, fresh, brackish or salt, including areas of marine water the depth of which at low tide does not exceed six metres. »The North-East Adriatic wetlands are a paradise for ornithologists and bird watchers. No other natural area in Europe can boast such diversity of bird species. So far over 400 species have been sighted here, which is a large number compared with just over 550 bird species to be found in Europe. Lagoons, lakes and other freshwater coastal and marine marshes bustling with life have been preserved thanks to efficient nature conservation projects and wise decisions,« says Dr. Fabio Perco, Conservation Manager of the Isola della Cona Biological Station at the Isonzo River Mouth Regional Nature Reserve. This brochure gives a short description of a part of this treasure – ten North Adriatic wetlands, hoping to spark public interest in the wealth of these diverse yet often unknown cover photos: Kajetan Kravos and neglected habitats and entice you to visit them.
    [Show full text]
  • ITALY – SLOVENIA – CROATIA SELF-GUIDED CYCLE TOUR, VENICE to POREC 8 DAYS / 7 NIGHTS 255 – 430 Km
    THREE COUNTRY BIKE TOUR 2020 ITALY – SLOVENIA – CROATIA SELF-GUIDED CYCLE TOUR, VENICE TO POREC 8 DAYS / 7 NIGHTS 255 – 430 km The starting point of this cycle tour begins with “la Serenissima”, Venice, the lagoon city on the shores of the Adriatic Sea. Cycling past the beaches of the classical holiday resorts of Jesolo and Caorle on the Italian Adriatic, an opportunity to take a refreshing swim. The inland regions of the Friuli-Venezia-Giulia offers countless sites with very special charm waiting to be discovered; Medieval fortress towns; Roman archaeological excavations; typical Italian piazzas and buildings embossed with Venetian influences. While on the one side the Adriatic stretches calmly and silently, the Julian Alps rise majestically to the north. The tour ends on the beautiful Croatian peninsula of Istria. Return journey to Venice can be done by boat. TERRAIN / GRADE The cycle trip is flat until just before Trieste, then it begins to climb slightly until Porec. Electric bikes are available for this tour (limited number - on request). Highlights and places of interest along the route Venice and the surrounding offshore islands The Italian seaside towns of Cavallino, Caorle, Jesolo and Grado The beaches of the Adriatic The important river port of Portogruaro for the maritime power of Venice Aquileia, a big city at the time of the Roman Empire The castles of Miramare and Duino Piran – a former Venetian town on the Slovenian coast ITINERARY Please note that on Day 3, 4 & 6, you need to give your 1st choice of town when booking, as there are options.
    [Show full text]
  • Analiza Opterećenja Radnika Plibel Metodom
    ANALIZA OPTEREĆENJA RADNIKA PLIBEL METODOM Barić, Antonio Undergraduate thesis / Završni rad 2019 Degree Grantor / Ustanova koja je dodijelila akademski / stručni stupanj: Karlovac University of Applied Sciences / Veleučilište u Karlovcu Permanent link / Trajna poveznica: https://urn.nsk.hr/urn:nbn:hr:128:651177 Rights / Prava: In copyright Download date / Datum preuzimanja: 2021-09-29 Repository / Repozitorij: Repository of Karlovac University of Applied Sciences - Institutional Repository VELEUČILIŠTE U KARLOVCU POSLOVNI ODJEL STRUČNI STUDIJ UGOSTITELJSTVA Antonija Aračić ODRŽIVA TURISTIČKA VALORIZACIJA PROSTORA UZ RIJEKU MREŽNICU ZAVRŠNI RAD Karlovac, 2019. Veleučilište u Karlovcu Poslovni odjel Preddiplomski stručni studij Ugostiteljstva Antonija Aračić ODRŽIVA TURISTIČKA VALORIZACIJA PROSTORA UZ RIJEKU MREŽNICU ZAVRŠNI RAD Kolegij: Turistička geografija Mentor: Božena Marković, mag. educ. geo. Matični broj studenta: 0618609092 Karlovac, rujan 2019. ZAHVALA Ovim putem želim se posebno zahvaliti svojoj mentorici Boženi Marković, mag. educ. geo., kao i komentorici dr. sc. Draženki Birkić, na ukazanoj stručnoj pomoći, kvalitetno prenesenom znanju i susretljivosti tijekom pisanja ovog završnog rada. Zahvaljujem se svim profesorima i asistentima Veleučilišta u Karlovcu na prenesenom znanju i profesionalnom pristupu tijekom mog studiranja. Najveću zahvalnost želim uputiti svojim roditeljima, bratu, sestri, obitelji i dečku koji su mi bili najveća podrška tijekom cijelog studiranja, poticaj i snaga te nikada nisu izgubili vjeru u mene. Također, zahvaljujem se svim svojim prijateljicama koje su mi nesebično pomagale kada god je to bilo potrebno. Moje zvijezde na nebu, ovo je za Vas! I SAŽETAK Prirodni fenomen, očuvani krški vodotoci rijeke Mrežnice ono su što rijeku Mrežnicu izdvaja od ostalih krških rijeka u Hrvatskoj. Čak 93 sedrena slapa, koja su u nejednakom rasteru duž toka ispresijecali rijeku stvorivši među sobom ujezerene dijelove toka.
    [Show full text]
  • 3/2020. Számú Jegyzőkönyve
    Pókaszepetk Község Önkormányzati Képviselőtestület 2020. március 3. napján megtartott nyílt ülésének 3/2020. számú Jegyzőkönyve H a t á r o z a t o k: Sorszáma Kódja Sorszáma Kódja 23/2020. E 16 24/2020. D 7 25/2020. K 1 26/2020. Z 1 27/2020. Z 1 R e n d e l e t e k: Kapcsolódó önkormányzati Sorszáma Tárgya Kódja Rendelet (Módosítás, vagy hatályon kívül helyezés) BOCFÖLDEI SZOCIÁLIS INTÉZMÉNYFENNTARTÓ TÁRSULÁS TÁRSULÁSI MEGÁLLAPODÁS Bocfölde és a társulásban résztvevő önkormányzatok a Magyarország helyi önkormányzatairól szóló 2011. évi CLXXXIX. törvény IV. fejezetében foglalt rendelkezések alapján az egyes önkormányzati feladat- és hatáskörök hatékonyabb és célszerűbb ellátására, a képviselő-testületeik döntése alapján jogi személyiséggel rendelkező társulást hoznak létre, amelynek érdekében az alábbi tartalommal társulási megállapodást kötnek: I. ÁLTALÁNOS RENDELKEZÉSEK A megállapodás 1. sz. mellékletében felsorolt települési önkormányzatok önálló jogi személyiséggel rendelkező társulást hoznak létre határozatlan időre. 1. A Társulás neve: Bocföldei Szociális Intézményfenntartó Társulás 2. A Társulás székhelye: 8943 Bocfölde, Ady Endre utca 15. 3. A Társulás tagjainak (továbbiakban: tagok) nevét, székhelyét és a tagokat megillető szavazatok számát e megállapodás 1. sz. melléklete tartalmazza. A Társulás tagjait, képviselőjének nevét e megállapodás 1/a függeléke tartalmazza. 4. A Társulás működési területe: - a II. 2.1 feladatok ellátására a társult önkormányzatok közigazgatási területe, - a II. 2.2 szociális /gyermekjóléti/ alapellátás keretében nyújtott szolgáltatás. Család- és gyermekjóléti szolgáltatás: → Feladatellátásra kötelezett közös önkormányzati hivatalok: Baki Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal, Bocföldei Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal, Egervári Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal, Gellénházai Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal, Pókaszepetki Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal, Zalaszentgyörgyi Közös Önkormányzati Hivatal 5. A Társulás a 2011. évi CLXXXIX.
    [Show full text]
  • Kistérségi Túraverseny Egerváron
    XV. évfolyam 5. szám 2014. május Kistérségi havilap Megjelenik az Észak-Nyugat Zalai Kistérségi Területfejlesztési Önkormányzatok Társulása támogatásával Kistérségi túraverseny Egerváron Kifogástalan idõjárás, ugyan- dott csapat tesztelte, akik elõtt akkor szerény létszám jellemez- végig titkolva voltak a feladatok, te a május 24-énEgerváron ren- de pontjaikkal házigazdaként dezett kistérségi túraversenyt. természetesen nem szálltak ver- TavalyZalaszentivánon Egervár senybe. Elsõ feladatként a Pince- gyõzedelmeskedett, így az idei dombon lövészetben jelesked- verseny szervezését õk vállalták hettek a túrázók, majd miután el. A térség települései közül felkapaszkodtak a kápolnához, Gõsfaés Vasboldogasszony két- az ott kitöltendõ teszteken az két,Nagypáli és Vöckönd egy- egervári vár és az egészségmeg- egy csapatot indított. A versen- õrzés szerepelt témaként. A har- gõket összesen hét állomáshe- madik pihenõhelyen már szük- lyen tették próbára, akiknek ter- ség volt az ügyességre is: mészetesen idén is meg kellett – Egyik feladatként a társulás birkózniuk a dimbes-dombos Za- településeinek zászlaját kell fel- lára jellemzõ terepviszonyokkal. ismerni és mellette mûanyag ké- – A csapatok a településeik zigránát dobógyakorlattal tettük zászlójával álltak rajthoz, plusz próbára a csapatokat. Ezen az pont járt a csatakiáltásáért, pol- állomáson bemutattuk a Magyar gármester résztvevõért is. A sza- Honvédség önkéntes katonai A kápolnától jó rálátás nyílt a feladatként szereplõ várra is. badegyetemisták, a helytörténeti életpályáját, mely meghatároz- klub és a polgárõrség is segített hatja a fiatalok jövõjét – mutatta gászat” szerepelt feladatként. A pata nyerte meg a vasboldog- abban, hogy a túrát zökkenés- be az állomáshely jellemzõit túrázók útja a Helytörténeti Klub- asszonyiCukorfalatok és a mentesen tudjuk lebonyolítani. Fücsök Imre, aki 29 évet szolgált hoz vezetett, ahol diótörésben Gõsfai Ászok elõtt. A feladatokat Sajnálatos, hogy idén a szoká- katonaként.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Médiaszolgáltatási Főosztály Médiaszolgáltatás-Bejelentési
    Médiaszolgáltatási Főosztály Médiaszolgáltatás-bejelentési Osztály Ügyiratszám:BJ/13306-2/2018 Tárgy: adatmódosulások tudomásul vétele Ügyintéző: személyes adat Telefon: személyes adat Fax: 06/1 45-77124 Határozat A Nemzeti Média- és Hírközlési Hatóság Hivatala (1015 Budapest, Ostrom utca 23-25., a továbbiakban: Hivatal) a Trial Média Kft. (8630 Balatonboglár, Klapka György u. 11-13.) médiaszolgáltató (a továbbiakban: Médiaszolgáltató) Balaton Televízió állandó megnevezésű lineáris médiaszolgáltatásában 2018. május 1. napjával bekövetkezett módosulásokat (terjesztéssel érintett települések neve; a bejelentett előfizetők összesített száma; a műsor terjesztését végző elektronikus hírközlési szolgáltató neve) – a Médiaszolgáltató 2018. május 14-én érkeztetett kérelmében foglaltaknak helyt adva – hatósági határozatával tudomásul veszi és nyilvántartásában átvezeti. A Hivatal a Médiaszolgáltató Balaton Televízió állandó megnevezésű lineáris médiaszolgáltatását az alábbi adatokkal tartja nyilván: a) A médiaszolgáltató neve és székhelye: Trial Média Kft. (8630 Balatonboglár, Klapka György u. 11-13.); b) Cégjegyzékszám: 14-09-305131; c) A médiaszolgáltatás jellege: kereskedelmi; d) A médiaszolgáltatás típusa: általános tematikájú; e) A médiaszolgáltatás fajtája: audiovizuális; f) Vezető tisztségviselő neve és lakcíme: Neubauer Sándor (8200 Veszprém, Budapest út 50.); g) A Hatósággal való kapcsolattartásra kijelölt személy neve és lakcíme: személyes adat; h) Gazdasági társaság társasági szerződése, alapító okirata, alapszabálya szerinti adatok:
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor
    From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.
    [Show full text]
  • OPERATIONS PLAN of HRVATSKE AUTOCESTE D.O.O. for 2020
    OPERATIONS PLAN OF HRVATSKE AUTOCESTE d.o.o. FOR 2020 Zagreb, December 2019 Hrvatske autoceste d.o.o. Operations Plan for 2020 CONTENTS: I. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 3 II. RESTRUCTURING ................................................................................................................................... 7 III. REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE PLAN ................................................................................................... 10 1. PLAN FOR THE HAC d.o.o. PROFIT AND LOSS ACCOUNT AS WELL AS ....................................... 11 INCOME AND EXPENSES / REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE OF THE PUBLIC GOOD (changes to the public capital) ........................................................................................................................ 11 2. STRUCTURE OF PLANNED REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE OF HAC AND THE PUBLIC GOOD OF ................................................................................................................................................. 12 IV. PLANNED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES, SALARY COSTS AND EMPLOYEES’ MATERIAL RIGHTS............ 17 V. FINANCING PLAN ................................................................................................................................ 19 1. Financing sources plan for the activities planned in 2020 ............................................................ 19 2. Planned loan debt status .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Izvješće O Stanju Okoliša Karlovačke Županije Za Razdoblje 2013. Do 2016. Godine
    Izvješće o stanju okoliša Karlovačke županije za razdoblje 2013. do 2016. godine za zaštitu prirode i okoliša Prilaz baruna Filipovića 21 10000 Zagreb OIB: 84310268229 Tel: +385 1 3717 317 IZVJEŠĆE O STANJU OKOLIŠA KARLOVAČKE ŽUPANIJE 2013. -2016. GODINE Zagreb, ožujak 2018. Zagreb, ožujak 2018. Izvješće o stanju okoliša Karlovačke županije za razdoblje 2013. do 2016. godine Naziv dokumentacije: Izvješće o stanju okoliša Karlovačke županije za razdoblje 2013. do 2016. godine Nositelj: Karlovačka županija, Upravni odjel za graditeljstvo i okoliš Kontakt informacije: [email protected] Izrađivač Izvješća: IRES EKOLOGIJA d.o.o. Voditelj stručnog tima izrađivača: Mirko Mesarić, dipl. ing. biol. Stručnjaci: Jasmina Benčić, mag. geogr. Dr. sc. Maja Hofman, mag. ing. prosp. arch. Mario Mesarić, mag. ing. agr. Djelatnici: Paula Bucić, mag. ing. oecoing. Marina Čačić, mag. ing. agr. Ivana Gudac, mag. ing. geol. Ivana Hazdovac, mag. oecol. Igor Ivanek, prof. biol. Mateja Leljak, mag. ing. prosp. arh. Martina Matijević, mag. geogr. Danijel Stanić, mag. ing. geol. Josip Stojak, mag. ing. silv Odgovorna osoba izrađivača: mr. sc. Marijan Gredelj Zagreb, ožujak 2018. Ovaj proizvod izrađen je pod nadzorom BUREAU VERITAS CROATIA odobrenog sustava upravljanja kvalitetom koji je sukladan: • normi ISO 9001 - broj certifikata: CRO20168Q • normi ISO 14001- broj certifikata: CRO19455E Zagreb, ožujak 2018. Izvješće o stanju okoliša Karlovačke županije za razdoblje 2013. do 2016. godine Sadržaj 1 Uvod ..........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]