DOCSLIB.ORG

Goleta Train Depot Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goleta Train Depot Project Goleta Train Depot Project Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by City of Goleta Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B Goleta, California 93117 Contact: Jaime A. Valdez, Principal Project Manager prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 209 East Victoria Street Santa Barbara, California 93101 June 2021 Goleta Train Depot Project Draft Environmental Impact Report prepared by City of Goleta Neighborhood Services and Public Safety Department 130 Cremona Drive, Suite B Goleta, California 93117 Contact: Jaime A. Valdez, Principal Project Manager prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 209 East Victoria Street Santa Barbara, California 93101 June 2021 This report prepared on 50 percent recycled paper with 50 percent post-consumer content Table of Contents Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... ES-1 Project Synopsis ......................................................................................................................... ES-1 Project Objectives ...................................................................................................................... ES-3 Alternatives ................................................................................................................................ ES-3 Areas of Known Controversy ..................................................................................................... ES-4 Issues to be Resolved ................................................................................................................. ES-4 Issues Not Studied in Detail in the EIR ....................................................................................... ES-4 Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ........................................................................ ES-4 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Environmental Impact Report Background..................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Purpose and Legal Authority ........................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Scope and Content .......................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Issues Not Studied in Detail within the EIR ..................................................................... 1-4 1.5 Lead, Responsible, and Trustee Agencies ....................................................................... 1-8 1.6 Environmental Review Process ....................................................................................... 1-8 2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Project Applicant ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Lead Agency Contact Person ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.4 Existing Site Characteristics ............................................................................................ 2-5 2.4.1 Current Land Use Designation and Zoning ..................................................... 2-5 2.4.2 Surrounding Land Uses ................................................................................... 2-5 2.5 Project Characteristics .................................................................................................... 2-5 2.5.1 Design ............................................................................................................. 2-9 2.5.2 On-Site Amenities ........................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.3 Signage ............................................................................................................ 2-9 2.5.4 Lighting and Safety Features ........................................................................ 2-10 2.5.5 Landscaping .................................................................................................. 2-10 2.5.6 Off-Site Improvements ................................................................................. 2-10 2.5.7 Parking and Site Access ................................................................................ 2-11 2.5.8 Utilities .......................................................................................................... 2-11 2.5.9 Construction and Grading ............................................................................. 2-11 2.5.10 Green Building Features ............................................................................... 2-12 2.6 Project Objectives ......................................................................................................... 2-12 2.7 Required Review and Approvals ................................................................................... 2-12 Draft Environmental Impact Report i City of Goleta Goleta Train Depot Project 3 Environmental Setting ................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Regional Setting .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 Project Site Setting .......................................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Cumulative Development ............................................................................................... 3-1 4 Environmental Impact Analysis .................................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.1.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.1-1 4.1.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.1-4 4.1.3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.1-8 4.1.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................... 4.1-15 4.2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions .......................................................................................... 4.2-1 4.2.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.2-1 4.2.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.2-5 4.2.3 Impact Analysis .......................................................................................... 4.2-10 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................... 4.2-18 4.3 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ............................................................................... 4.3-1 4.3.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.3-1 4.3.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.3-2 4.3.3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.3-6 4.3.4 Cumulative Impact Analysis ....................................................................... 4.3-11 4.4 Noise ............................................................................................................................ 4.4-1 4.4.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.4-1 4.4.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.4-5 4.4.3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.4-8 4.4.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................... 4.4-16 4.5 Transportation ............................................................................................................. 4.5-1 4.5.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.5-1 4.5.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.5-6 4.5.3 Impact Analysis ............................................................................................ 4.5-9 4.5.4 Cumulative Impacts ................................................................................... 4.5-17 4.6 Tribal Cultural Resources ............................................................................................. 4.6-1 4.6.1 Setting .......................................................................................................... 4.6-1 4.6.2 Regulatory Setting ....................................................................................... 4.6-1 4.6.3 Impact Analysis ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Ynez Annual Report
    FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-SECOND ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2019-2020 April 24, 2020 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON 1126-13 April 24, 2020 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Second Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2019-2020 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2019-2020. This, the Forty-Second Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Introduction 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings and Determinations 7 1.5. Sources of Information 8 2.0 Groundwater Charges 9 2.1. Revenues 10 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Quality in the Santa Rita, Buellton, and Los Olivos Hydrologic Subareas of the Santa
    GROUND-WATER QUALITY IN THE SANTA RITA, BUELLTON, AND LOS OLIVOS HYDROLOGIC SUBAREAS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER BASIN, SANTA BARBARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By Scott N. Hamlin U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4131 Prepared in cooperation with the CALIFORNIA REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD, CENTRAL COAST REGION o C\J I C\J Sacramento, California 1985 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, SECRETARY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report write to: can be purchased from: Open-File Services Section District Chief Western Distribution Branch U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Federal Building, Room W-2234 Box 25425, Federal Center 2800 Cottage Way Denver, CO 80225 Sacramento, CA 95825 Telephone: (303) 236-7476 CONTENTS Page Abstract ------------------------------------------------------------- i Introduction -------------- - ______________ ______________________ 2 Location and general features -------------------- --- ----- - 2 Problem - - - - - -- 2 Purpose and scope ----------------------------------------------- 4 Approach -------------------------------------------------------- 4 Previous work ------------- _-_-_-----_ ____ _________________ 5 Acknowledgments ------------------------------------------------- 5 Well-numbering system ------------------------ --- ______--_--_ 5 Ground-water geology ------------------------------------------------- 7 Main water-bearing units -------- __________ _____ _______ __ 7 Geologic structure
    [Show full text]
  • Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara's Gibraltar
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities FONSI-12-086 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation January 2016 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California Draft FONSI-12-086 Storage and Conveyance of the City of Santa Barbara’s Gibraltar Reservoir Pass Through Water in and Through Cachuma Project Facilities _____________ Prepared by: Stacy L. Holt Date Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Ned M. Gruenhagen Date Wildlife Biologist or Biology Technician _____________ Concurred by: Rain L. Emerson Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Approved by: Michael P. Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager Draft FONSI-12-086 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation), has determined that executing 5- and 40- year Warren Act contracts with the City of Santa Barbara (City) is not a major federal action that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment and an environmental impact statement is not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Determination
    NOTICE OF DETERMINATION Office of Planning and Research Clerk of the Board 1400 Tenth Street, Room 113 County of Santa Barbara Sacramento, CA 95814 105 E. Anapamu Street, Room 407 Santa Barbara, CA 93101 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with Section 21108 or 22152 of the Public Resources Code. State Clearinghouse Number: 2021020258 Project Title: Floradale Crossing Sewer Line Directional Drill Project Project Applicant: City of Lompoc City Project Files: ER20-19 Project Location: Upstream of Floradale Bridge, City of Lompoc, and County of Santa Barbara Project Description: The project proposes to install approximately 700 feet of inverted siphon interceptor sewer line using two 12-inch diameter High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) pipes and Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD) trenchless technology boring under the Santa Ynez River. The second 12-inch pipe is intended to provide redundancy, stability and to allow for maintenance or repair. The sewer lines will be placed east (upstream) of the existing Floradale Bridge, extending from the southeast side of the existing Floradale Bridge, under the Santa Ynez River to the northeast side existing Floradale Bridge, within the existing 20-foot easement. The City Council of the City of Lompoc approved the above described project on April 6, 2021, and made the following determinations: 1. The project [ will, will not] have a significant effect on the environment. 2. An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures [ were, were not] made a condition of approval for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 2 Geologic Map and Boundaries Rev1
    924 Anacapa Street, Suite 4A Santa Barbara, CA 93101 PH 805.897.3800 www.geosyntec.com TO: Stetson Engineers SUBJECT: DRAFT Technical Memorandum Regional Geology and 3D Geologic Model for the Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin PREPARED BY: Eryn Torres, Senior Professional Maygan Cline, Senior Geologist Mark Grivetti, Senior Principal Hydrogeologist DATE: May 12, 2020 1. INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum is prepared as part of the hydrogeologic conceptual model (HCM) for the Western and Central Management Areas (WMA and CMA, respectively) Groundwater Sustainability Agencies1 (GSAs) within the larger Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin (SYRVGB). This technical memorandum focuses on the geologic units within the SYRVGB, and the subsurface geologic model built to visualize those units. The aquifer characteristics of these units are then considered in a separate study which correlates principal aquifers within the basin. This technical memo describes the modeled geologic units and existing literature that identifies the water-bearing tendency of each unit but does not include an in-depth principal aquifer analysis or discussion. The HCM is the conceptual understanding of the physical characteristics related to the regional hydrology, land use, geologic units and structures, groundwater quality, principal groundwater aquifers, and principle aquitards of the WMA and CMA portions of the SYRVGB (basin). Understanding the regional geologic setting and structural configuration is integral to conducting subsequent technical studies of the basin, including presence, absence and correlation of principal aquifers, identification of an appropriate monitoring network, numerical groundwater modeling, and identification of projects and management actions in accordance with the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). A detailed subsurface three-dimensional model of the geologic units and structures (model) that comprise the basin was developed from publicly available published reports and data sources from the WMA and CMA GSAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Cachuma Board Decision Fact Sheet
    State Water Board Adopts Revised Order for Cachuma Project in Santa Barbara County Order Will Improve Water Conditions for Survival of Migrating Fish Overview A Board-approved order issued Sept. 17, 2019 will increase the instream flow requirements (in the Bureau of Reclamation’s water rights) downstream of Lake Cachuma in Santa Barbara County for the protection of fish, possibly reducing the water supply for communities that rely on the lake. The revised document addresses injury resulting from construction and operation of Bradbury Dam to senior water right holders and public trust resources such as the endangered species Southern California steelhead. Additionally, the Board granted Reclamation’s request and changed the permits’ purposes and places of use. The order is based on evidence and testimony presented at multiple hearings spanning more than a decade. Historical Role of the State Water Boards Built in 1956 by Reclamation and consisting of Bradbury Dam and Cachuma Reservoir, the project captures the seasonal floodwaters for use by communities in Santa Barbara County. It serves approximately 150,000 people between the Santa Ynez Mountains and the Pacific Coast, including those in Santa Barbara, Goleta, Montecito, Summerland and Carpinteria, and another 13,000 in Santa Ynez, Los Olivos, Ballard and Solvang. Since the State Water Board issued the water right permits to Reclamation in 1958, the Board has retained the authority to determine the requirements necessary to protect senior water rights and public trust resources downstream of Bradbury Dam, including the endangered steelhead fishery. What the Draft Order Requires It amends the terms and conditions of Reclamation’s water right permits for the project to protect the steelhead fishery and other public trust resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Esri User Conference 2017
    Esri User Conference 2017 Sunday, July 09 ___________________________________________________________________________ 8:30am - 9:45am Schools Curriculum Special Interest Group Meeting Marriott - Newport Beach DESCRIPTION Take a deeper dive into curriculum design and development strategies and implementations used by Esri, universities, teacher organizations, school districts and beyond. Arrive ready to share your work and meet colleagues. ___________________________________________________________________________ 9:00am - 5:00pm Sunday Water UC Meeting Meetings/Socials SDCC - Room 29 C DESCRIPTION The Esri Water User Conference (UC) meeting is a full day focused on everything water: water utilities and water resources. Learn about the latest ArcGIS solution updates from Esri staff, including mobile, enhanced analytics, and flood solutions. Be inspired from innovative peers solving today's water problems. Make new connections at our networking lunch, and enjoy the company of water professionals like you. Registration for this meeting is $50. Please register at the link: go.esri.com/uc- water-meetup ___________________________________________________________________________ 9:00am - 5:00pm Sunday Water UC Meeting Meetings/Socials SDCC - Room 29 A DESCRIPTION The Esri Water User Conference (UC) meeting is a full day focused on everything water: water utilities and water resources. Learn about the latest ArcGIS solution updates from Esri staff, including mobile, enhanced analytics, and flood solutions. Be inspired from innovative peers solving
    [Show full text]
  • The 43Rd Annual Engineering and Survey Report on Water Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water
    FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2020-2021 April 21, 2021 Northern California Southern California Arizona Colorado Oregon FORTY-THIRD ANNUAL ENGINEERING AND SURVEY REPORT ON WATER SUPPLY CONDITIONS OF THE SANTA YNEZ RIVER WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 2020-2021 April 21, 2021 CARLSBAD, COVINA, AND SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA APACHE JUNCTION, ARIZONA CENTENNIAL, COLORADO MEDFORD, OREGON INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 1126-13 April 21, 2021 San Rafael Board of Directors Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District P.O. Box 719 Santa Ynez, California 93460 Re: Forty-Third Annual Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District, 2020-2021 Dear Board Members: Transmitted herewith is our Engineering Survey and Report on Water Supply Conditions of the Santa Ynez River Water Conservation District for 2020-2021. This, the Forty-Third Annual Report, presents the required and pertinent information for the Board of Directors to make necessary determinations for levying groundwater charges upon the production of groundwater from water-producing facilities (water wells) within the District. As such, it provides information on the status of the groundwater and surface water supplies, as well as the annual production of groundwater from within the District. Sincerely, Oliver S. Page OSP:rrk Enclosures INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK TABLES OF CONTENTS Page Number 1.0 Executive Summary 1 1.1. Historical Background 1 1.2. Description of the District 2 1.3. Report Summary 3 1.4. Findings 9 1.5. Sources of Information 10 2.0 GroundWater Charges 11 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cachuma Project, California
    Cachuma Project Thomas A. Latousek Bureau of Reclamation 1995 Table of Contents The Cachuma Project...........................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................4 Authorization...........................................................6 Construction History .....................................................8 Post-Construction History................................................14 Settlement of the Project .................................................19 Uses of Project Water ...................................................19 Conclusion............................................................20 Bibliography ................................................................21 Manuscripts and Archival Collections.......................................21 Government Documents .................................................21 Books ................................................................21 Articles...............................................................21 Interviews.............................................................21 Index ......................................................................23 1 The Cachuma Project The Cachuma Project, proclaimed by Commissioner Michael Straus in 1949 as "Reclamation's first Seacoast
    [Show full text]
  • Cachuma Conservation Release Board CCRB Is a Joint Powers Agency Whose Members Are the City of Santa Barbara, Goleta Water District, and the Montecito Water District
    CACHUMA CONSERVATION RELEASE BOARD Cachuma Conservation Release Board CCRB is a joint powers agency whose members are the City of Santa Barbara, Goleta Water District, and the Montecito Water District. Formed in 1973, CCRB represents its Member Agencies and their rate-paying customers in interactions with State and Federal agencies to protect vital water supplies and protect Southern California Steelhead and important habitat Cachuma Reservoir and Bradbury Dam at the Cachuma Reservoir and Santa Ynez River. In Recognition of the need for an additional reliable supply of water for the Santa Barbara South Coast and Santa Ynez Valley, The Secretary of the Interior approved the Cachuma Project in 1948. The Cachuma Project was constructed by the US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) and completed in 1953. The Reservoir spilled for the first time in April 1958. Since that time the Project has provided more reliable water supplies to Santa Barbara County’s South Coast and the Santa Ynez Valley. Combined, CCRB’s Member Agencies rely on the Cachuma Project to provide up to 85% of the water supplies for more than 200,000 residents and 12,000 acres of agriculture. Federal Endangered Species Consultation In 1997, the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) listed Southern California Steelhead as an Endangered Species, resulting in a Consultation on the Cachuma Project between NMFS and USBR to determine whether steelhead or their habitat were threatened by the Project. This process resulted in a Biological Opinion released by NMFS in 2000 that concluded the operation Southern California Steelhead of the Cachuma Project would not jeopardize the continued existence of steelhead with the implementation of measures to minimize harm to the fish and its habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum
    Attachment C TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: Rob Morrow, WSC CC: Joshua Haggmark, Dakota Corey and Catherine Taylor, Santa Barbara PREPARED BY: Warren Greco and Emily Honn, Woodard & Curran REVIEWED BY: Brian Van Lienden, Woodard & Curran DATE: October 30, 2020 RE: Santa Barbara Surface Water Supply Analysis 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this technical memorandum is to focus on the City of Santa Barbara’s (City) surface water supplies from Gibraltar Reservoir and Lake Cachuma and to identify their performance against future constraints, risks, and uncertainties, including climate change. Hydrologic analyses were performed using the RiverWare Model of the Santa Ynez River (RiverWare Model) to determine impacts to water supply to the City under a series of scenarios. The City’s surface water supplies are summarized on an average annual basis and for a critical drought period. This analysis includes three operational scenarios for Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir, described below: Scenario 1 – Existing Conditions: This scenario simulates Lake Cachuma and Gibraltar Reservoir under the existing operational scenarios and storage capacities. Scenario 2 – Pass Through Operations: This scenario simulates Gibraltar Reservoir under future operations based on the implementation of Pass Through Operations, and the existing storage capacities. Scenario 3 – Gibraltar Sedimentation: This scenario simulates Gibraltar Reservoir under future operations based on the implementation of Pass Through Operations and future storage capacity based on continued
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin
    Santa Barbara County Groundwater Characterization Project: Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin Riley Haas, Heal the Ocean Howard Kolb, PE, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board James Bishop, PG, Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board Heal the Ocean Central Coast Regional Water Quality Control Board June 18, 2019 Santa Barbara County Groundwater Characterization Project: i Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin Santa Barbara County Groundwater Characterization Project: ii Santa Ynez River Valley Groundwater Basin Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 I. Study Area ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. OWTS Risk Assessment ..................................................................................................... 6 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 II. OWTS Risk Assessment Methods ................................................................................... 7 III. OWTS Risk Assessment Results and Discussion .......................................................10 3. Groundwater Quality Overview ..........................................................................................11
    [Show full text]