Bulletin De La Banque De France 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 Economic Research

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Bulletin De La Banque De France 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 Economic Research Bulletin de la Banque de France 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 Economic research Convergence trading, arbitrage and systemic risk in the United States Convergence trading, especially arbitrage, is used on a large scale by investment banks and hedge funds, and contributes to the smooth integration of financial markets. However, it is also a source of systemic risk, as the transactions involve short-term debt that can be cut off by the creditor in times of market stress. In this case, arbitrageurs are forced to rapidly unwind their positions, leading to abnormal falls and divergences in asset prices. This risk materialised in the US Treasury market during the crises of 1998 – with the collapse of the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) – and of 2008, but ultimately proved contained in the 2020 health crisis. The intervention or non-intervention in the market of the US Federal Reserve can be linked to the severity of the financial crises. Hugues Dastarac JEL codes: Monetary and Financial Analysis Directorate G01, Financial Economics Research Division G23, G28 This bulletin presents the findings of research carried out at the Banque de France. The views expressed in this bulletin are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Banque de France. Any errors or omissions are the responsibility of the authors. 3 Convergence trading by US primary dealers and corporate bond spreads number of major financial crises (outstanding amounts in USD billions; spread in %) in the past 25 years Corporate Treasury Spread on A-rated bonds Spread on BBB-rated bonds bonds bonds (right-hand scale) (right-hand scale) involving convergence trading 300 250 July 2007 Bankruptcies of 200 Be ar Stearns USD 200 billion 150 Lehman Brothers net stock of US Treasury bonds 100 shorted by primary dealers 50 as at end-June 2007 0 -50 15 -100 -150 10 -200 5 -250 -300 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, FINRA (TRACE database); Dastarac (2020). Note: Stocks of corporate bonds held by primary dealers and stocks of Treasury bonds shorted by primary dealers. Median spreads between corporate bonds with a residual maturity of between 4 and 6 years and rated A or BBB by the strictest agency, and an equivalent Treasury bond (Gilchrist and Zakrajsek, 2012). Bulletin de la Banque de France Economic research 2 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 1 What are convergence trading identical. An investor looking to buy one of the bonds will and arbitrage? most likely choose the cheaper one, causing its price to rise. The prices of the two bonds should thus converge Convergence trading consists in exploiting the difference over time and the risk should remain limited; however, between two asset prices in the expectation that they will the price divergences and potential profits in this case converge over the short or medium term. The strategy are small. In order to generate acceptable returns for the is mainly used by investment banks and hedge funds.1 shareholder, arbitrageurs sometimes have to use massive Another term for convergence trading is relative value leverage, which creates substantial risks (see below). trading or pairs trading. LTCM’s strategy When the two assets involved are almost identical, the practice is known as arbitrage. Launched in 1994, the hedge fund Long Term Capital Management (LTCM) used arbitrage to exploit the How do you profit from price divergences? divergence between recently issued (on-the-run) US Treasury bonds, which are more liquid and To illustrate, take the example of two bonds from the same more expensive, and those issued a few months issuer, with similar maturities and equivalent contract earlier (off-the-run), which are less liquid and cheaper. terms (same seniority, option for early redemption by LTCM shorted on-the-run securities and went long in the issuer, same coupon, etc.). The strategy consists first off-the-run securities, in the expectation that their prices in buying the cheaper bond, which we shall call A, and would converge over the next few months, as had short selling the more expensive bond, called B; short generally been observed. selling a bond means borrowing it from an investor and selling it onwards in the market. In the second step of US banks’ strategy in the 2000s for Treasury the strategy, bond A is sold and bond B is bought back and corporate bonds in order to return it to its owner. In the 2000s, primary dealers3 in the United States built The strategy is profitable if the prices of A and B up long positions in corporate bonds while simultaneously converge. If, for example, the price2 of bond A falls, shorting US Treasury bonds (see Chart 1 below). The the convergence between the two prices will mean that corporate bonds they purchased were rated investment the price of bond B falls even further; the loss on the grade,4 meaning that the associated default risk was purchase/resale of bond A is therefore more than offset moderate to low (Dastarac, 2020). by the gain on the sale/repurchase of bond B. The same applies if the price of bond B rises. The strategy was as follows: all other things being equal, Treasury bonds are more liquid and therefore cost more In general, convergence trading can be just as risky as than corporate bonds; as a result, it appeared profitable gambling on whether the price of any asset will rise or to short sell Treasury bonds and buy top-rated corporate fall. In the case of arbitrage, bonds A and B are almost bonds with similar maturities. 1 Investment banks provide services for businesses: lending, cash management, securities issuance and market making, arbitrage, etc. Hedge funds are investment funds that use leverage to hedge certain components of their assets and increase their exposure to other components (as described in this article). 2 In reality, the price at which an investor can purchase an asset (offer or ask price) is higher than the price at which it can sell it (bid price) to an intermediary. This difference (the bid-ask spread) must be taken into account when assessing the profitability of a convergence trade. Here, the price (singular) of an asset is taken to be the average of the bid and ask prices. 3 Banks and other financial institutions agree to subscribe regularly to issues of US Treasury bonds, and trade them in the secondary market. 4 Bonds top-rated by credit ratings agencies. Convergence trading, arbitrage and systemic risk in the United States Bulletin de la Banque de France Economic research 3 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 C1 US primary dealers’ positions and corporate bond spreads (outstanding amounts in USD billions, spread in %) oo bon bon S on bon in l S on bon in l 300 20 l 200 nkri o 200 Sn 0 n o 00 0 0 0 15 00 0 0 200 5 20 300 0 2002 2003 2004 200 2006 200 2008 2009 200 2011 202 203 2014 2015 2016 Sources: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, FINRA (TRACE database); Dastarac (2020). Note: Stocks of corporate bonds held by primary dealers and stocks of Treasury bonds shorted by primary dealers. Median spreads between corporate bonds with a residual maturity of between 4 and 6 years and rated A or BBB by the strictest agency, and an equivalent Treasury bond (Gilchrist and Zakrajsek, 2012). The benefits of convergence trading and especially 2 The 1998 and 2008 crises arbitrage: intermediation between fragmented markets laid bare the risks of convergence trading Two identical bonds, A and B, generate identical revenues in all circumstances. Consequently, any price divergence In theory, arbitrage is risk-free if (i) bonds A and B between the two bonds reflects a fragmentation between are absolutely identical, and (ii) the arbitrageur markets: participants in the market for bond B, which can maintain their positions5 indefinitely. If these is more expensive, cannot opt instead to buy bond A, conditions are met, the arbitrageur can wait until which is more attractive price-wise. either the bonds mature or the issuer defaults: they will then receive a reimbursement for bond A and, There is therefore a benefit to be gained from bringing instead of returning bond B to its owner, can give participants in both markets together: participants in back an amount corresponding to the security’s full or market A can sell their securities at a higher price partial reimbursement. to participants in market B. While a straightforward merger between markets might be impossible, or indeed Risk 1: the bond prices do not converge undesirable from the point of view of market managers, because the observed divergences are justified arbitrageurs can bring the two together by buying from by the underlying fundamentals sellers in market A and selling to buyers in market B. Betting that the prices of two very different assets will However, the benefits for markets go hand in hand with converge is just as risky as gambling that an asset price substantial risks. will rise or fall. 5 A position in a security can be short or long. A long position is where the investor holds the security. A short position is where the investor has borrowed the security and sold it in the market. Convergence trading, arbitrage and systemic risk in the United States Bulletin de la Banque de France Economic research 4 235/1 - MAY-JUNE 2021 Even in the case of arbitrage, in practice two assets The loan to fund position A takes the form of a repurchase are rarely completely identical, so the revenues they agreement (repo): the lender purchases the security from generate may differ.
Recommended publications
  • 2017 Financial Services Industry Outlook
    NEW YORK 535 Madison Avenue, 19th Floor New York, NY 10022 +1 212 207 1000 SAN FRANCISCO One Market Street, Spear Tower, Suite 3600 San Francisco, CA 94105 +1 415 293 8426 DENVER 999 Eighteenth Street, Suite 3000 2017 Denver, CO 80202 FINANCIAL SERVICES +1 303 893 2899 INDUSTRY REVIEW MEMBER, FINRA / SIPC SYDNEY Level 2, 9 Castlereagh Street Sydney, NSW, 2000 +61 419 460 509 BERKSHIRE CAPITAL SECURITIES LLC (ARBN 146 206 859) IS A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY INCORPORATED IN THE UNITED STATES AND REGISTERED AS A FOREIGN COMPANY IN AUSTRALIA UNDER THE CORPORATIONS ACT 2001. BERKSHIRE CAPITAL IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS TO HOLD AN AUSTRALIAN FINANCIAL SERVICES LICENCE UNDER THE AUSTRALIAN CORPORATIONS ACT IN RESPECT OF THE FINANCIAL SERVICES IT PROVIDES. BERKSHIRE CAPITAL IS REGULATED BY THE SEC UNDER US LAWS, WHICH DIFFER FROM AUSTRALIAN LAWS. LONDON 11 Haymarket, 2nd Floor London, SW1Y 4BP United Kingdom +44 20 7828 2828 BERKSHIRE CAPITAL SECURITIES LIMITED IS AUTHORISED AND REGULATED BY THE FINANCIAL CONDUCT AUTHORITY (REGISTRATION NUMBER 188637). www.berkcap.com CONTENTS ABOUT BERKSHIRE CAPITAL Summary 1 Berkshire Capital is an independent employee-owned investment bank specializing in M&A in the financial services sector. With more completed transactions in this space than any Traditional Investment Management 6 other investment bank, we help clients find successful, long-lasting partnerships. Wealth Management 9 Founded in 1983, Berkshire Capital is headquartered in New York with partners located in Cross Border 13 London, Sydney, San Francisco, Denver and Philadelphia. Our partners have been with the firm an average of 14 years. We are recognized as a leading expert in the asset management, Real Estate 17 wealth management, alternatives, real estate and broker/dealer industries.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamic Strategic Arbitrage∗
    Dynamic Strategic Arbitrage∗ Vincent Fardeauy Frankfurt School of Finance and Managment This version: June 11, 2014 Abstract Asset prices do not adjust instantaneously following uninformative demand or supply shocks. This paper offers a theory based on arbitrageurs' price impact to explain these slow-moving cap- ital dynamics. Arbitrageurs recognizing their price impact break up trades, leading to gradual price adjustments. When shocks are anticipated, prices exhibit a V-shaped pattern, with a peak at the realization of the shocks. The dynamics of market depth and price adjustments depend on the degree of competition between arbitrageurs. When shocks are uncertain, price dynamics depend on the interaction between arbitrageurs' competition and the total risk-bearing capacity of the market. JEL codes: G12, G20, L12; Keywords: Strategic arbitrage, liquidity, price impact, limits of arbitrage. ∗I benefited from comments from Miguel Ant´on,Bruno Biais, Maria-Cecilia Bustamante, Amil Dasgupta, Michael Gordy, Martin Oehmke (discussant), Matt Pritsker, Jean-Charles Rochet, Yuki Sato, Kostas Zachariadis, Jean-Pierre Zigrand and seminar and conference participants at LSE, INSEAD, FRB, the University of Zurich and the 2013 AFA meetings in San Diego. I am grateful to Dimitri Vayanos and Denis Gromb for supervision and insights. Jay Im provided excellent research assistance. This paper is the first part of a paper previously circulated as \Strategic Arbitrage with Entry". All remaining errors are my own. yDepartment of Finance, Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, Sonnemannstrasse 9-11, 60314 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Email: [email protected]. 1 1 Introduction Empirical evidence shows that prices recover slowly from demand or supply shocks that are unre- lated to future earnings and that these patterns are due to imperfections in the supply of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Convergence Trading with Unobservable Pricing Errors
    OPTIMAL CONVERGENCE TRADING WITH UNOBSERVABLE PRICING ERRORS SÜHAN ALTAY, KATIA COLANERI, AND ZEHRA EKSI Abstract. We study a dynamic portfolio optimization problem related to convergence trading, which is an investment strategy that exploits temporary mispricing by simultane- ously buying relatively underpriced assets and selling short relatively overpriced ones with the expectation that their prices converge in the future. We build on the model of Liu and Timmermann [22] and extend it by incorporating unobservable Markov-modulated pricing errors into the price dynamics of two co-integrated assets. We characterize the optimal portfolio strategies in full and partial information settings both under the assumption of unrestricted and beta-neutral strategies. By using the innovations approach, we provide the filtering equation that is essential for solving the optimization problem under partial information. Finally, in order to illustrate the model capabilities, we provide an example with a two-state Markov chain. 1. Introduction Convergence-type trading strategies have become one of the most popular trading strate- gies that are used to capitalize on market inefficiencies, or deviations from “equilibrium,” especially with the rapid developments in algorithmic and high-frequency trading. For a typical convergence trade, temporary mispricing is exploited by simultaneously buying rel- atively underpriced assets and selling short relatively overpriced assets in anticipation that at some future date their prices will have become closer. Thus one can profit by the extent of the convergence. A prime example of a convergence trade is a pairs trading strategy that involves a long position and a short position in a pair of similar stocks that have moved together historically and hence an investor can profit from the relative value trade arising arXiv:1910.01438v2 [q-fin.PM] 7 Oct 2019 from the cointegration between asset price dynamics involved in the trade.
    [Show full text]
  • Europe's Largest Single Managers Ranked by a Um
    2013 IN ASSOCIATION WITH IN ASSOCIATION 5O EUROPEEUROPE’S LARGEST SINGLE MANAGERS RANKED BY AUM EUROPE50 01 02 03 04 Brevan Howard Man BlueCrest Capital Blackrock Management 1 1 1 1 Total AUM (as at 30.06.13) Total AUM (as at 30.06.13) Total AUM (as at 01.04.13) Total AUM (as at 30.06.13) $40.0bn $35.6bn $34.22bn $28.7bn 2 2 2 2 2012 ranking 2012 ranking 2012 ranking 2012 ranking 2 1 3 6 3 3 3 3 Founded Founded Founded Founded 2002 1783 (as a cooperage) 2000 1988 4 4 4 4 Founders/principals Founders/principals Founders/principals Founders/principals Alan Howard Manny Roman (CEO), Luke Ellis (President), Mike Platt, Leda Braga Larry Fink Jonathan Sorrell (CFO) 5 5 5 Hedge fund(s) 5 Hedge fund(s) Hedge fund(s) Fund name: Brevan Howard Master Fund Hedge fund(s) Fund name: BlueCrest Capital International Fund name: UK Emerging Companies Hedge Limited Fund name: Man AHL Diversified plc Inception date: 12/2000 Fund Inception date: 04/2003 Inception date:03/1996 AUM: $13.5bn Inception date: Not disclosed AUM: $27.4bn AUM: $7.9bn Portfolio manager: Mike Platt AUM: Not disclosed Portfolio manager: Multiple portfolio Portfolio manager: Tim Wong, Matthew Strategy: Global macro Portfolio manager: Not disclosed managers Sargaison Asset classes: Not disclosed Strategy: Equity long/short Strategy: Global macro, relative value Strategy: Managed futures Domicile: Not disclosed Asset classes: Not disclosed Asset classes: Fixed income and FX Asset classes: Cross asset Domicile: Not disclosed Domicile: Cayman Islands Domicile: Ireland Fund name: BlueTrend
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Convergence Trade Strategies*
    Optimal Convergence Trade Strategies∗ Jun Liu† Allan Timmermann‡ UC San Diego and SAIF UC San Diego and CREATES October4,2012 Abstract Convergence trades exploit temporary mispricing by simultaneously buying relatively un- derpriced assets and selling short relatively overpriced assets. This paper studies optimal con- vergence trades under both recurring and non-recurring arbitrage opportunities represented by continuing and ‘stopped’ cointegrated price processes and considers both fixed and stochastic (Poisson) horizons. We demonstrate that conventional long-short delta neutral strategies are generally suboptimal and show that it can be optimal to simultaneously go long (or short) in two mispriced assets. We also find that the optimal portfolio holdings critically depend on whether the risky asset position is liquidated when prices converge. Our theoretical results are illustrated using parameters estimated on pairs of Chinese bank shares that are traded on both the Hong Kong and China stock exchanges. We find that the optimal convergence trade strategy can yield economically large gains compared to a delta neutral strategy. Key words: convergence trades; risky arbitrage; delta neutrality; optimal portfolio choice ∗The paper was previously circulated under the title Optimal Arbitrage Strategies. We thank the Editor, Pietro Veronesi, and an anonymous referee for detailed and constructive comments on the paper. We also thank Alberto Jurij Plazzi, Jun Pan, seminar participants at the CREATES workshop on Dynamic Asset Allocation, Blackrock, Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance, and Remin University of China for helpful discussions and comments. Antonio Gargano provided excellent research assistance. Timmermann acknowledges support from CREATES, funded by the Danish National Research Foundation. †UCSD and Shanghai Advanced Institute of Finance (SAIF).
    [Show full text]
  • Asset Pricing with Arbitrage Activity∗
    Asset pricing with arbitrage activity∗ Julien Hugonniery Rodolfo Prietoz Forthcoming: Journal of Financial Economics Abstract We study an economy populated by three groups of myopic agents: Constrained agents subject to a portfolio constraint that limits their risk-taking, unconstrained agents subject to a standard nonnegative wealth constraint, and arbitrageurs with access to a credit facility. Such credit is valuable as it allows arbitrageurs to exploit the limited arbitrage opportunities that emerge endogenously in reaction to the demand imbalance generated by the portfolio constraint. The model is solved in closed-form and we show that, in contrast to existing models with frictions and logarithmic agents, arbitrage activity has an impact on the price level and generates both excess volatility and the leverage effect. We show that these results are due to the fact that arbitrageurs amplify fundamental shocks by levering up in good times and deleveraging in bad times. Keywords: Limits of arbitrage; Rational bubbles; Wealth constraints; Excess volatility; Leverage effect. JEL Classification: D51, D52, G11, G12. ∗A previous draft of this paper was circulated under the title \Arbitrageurs, bubbles and credit conditions". For helpful comments we thank Hengjie Ai, Rui Albuquerque, Harjoat Bhamra, Pablo Casta~neda,Pierre Collin Dufresne, J´er^omeDetemple, Bernard Dumas, Phil Dybvig, Zhiguo He, Leonid Kogan, Mark Loewenstein, Marcel Rindisbacher, and seminar participants at the 2013 AMS meetings at Boston College, the Bank of Canada, Boston University, the 8th Cowles Conference, the 2012 FIRS Conference, the Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, the 4th Finance UC Conference, Universidad Adolfo Ib´a~nez,University of Geneva and University of Lugano.
    [Show full text]
  • Due Diligence for Fixed Income and Credit Strategies
    34724_GrRoundtable.qxp 5/30/07 11:04 AM Page 1 The Education Committee of The GreenwichKnowledge,R Veracity,oundtable Fellowship The Greenwich Roundtable Presents Spring 2007 In This Issue About the Greenwich Roundtable Best Practices in Hedge Fund Investing: DUE DILIGENCE FOR FIXED INCOME Research Council AND CREDIT STRATEGIES Introduction Table of Contents 34724_GrRoundtable.qxp 5/30/07 11:04 AM Page 2 NOTICE G Greenwich Roundtable, Inc. is a not- for-profit corporation with a mission to promote education in alternative investments. To that end, Greenwich R Roundtable, Inc. has facilitated the compilation, printing, and distribu- tion of this publication, but cannot warrant that the content is complete, accurate, or based on reasonable assumptions, and hereby expressly disclaims responsibility and liability to any person for any loss or damage arising out of the use of or any About the Greenwich Roundtable reliance on this publication. Before making any decision utilizing content referenced in this publica- The Greenwich Roundtable, Inc. is a not-for- The Greenwich Roundtable hosts monthly, tion, you are to conduct and rely profit research and educational organization mediated symposiums at the Bruce Museum in upon your own due diligence includ- located in Greenwich, Connecticut, for investors Greenwich, Connecticut. Attendance in these ing the advice you receive from your who allocate capital to alternative investments. It forums is limited to members and their invited professional advisors. is operated in the spirit of an intellectual cooper- guests. Selected invited speakers define com- In consideration for the use of this ative for the alternative investment community. plex issues, analyze risks, reveal opportunities, publication, and by continuing to Mostly, its 200 members are institutional and and share their outlook on the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Hedgeweek Awards 2013 LEADING the WAY UNRIVALLED in CHOICE, QUALITY and EXPERIENCE
    March 2013 Hedgeweek Awards 2013 LEADING THE WAY UNRIVALLED IN CHOICE, QUALITY AND EXPERIENCE LYXOR MANAGED ACCOUNT PLATFORM, INNOVATING SINCE 1998 With $11bn assets under management*, only Lyxor’s Managed Account Platform gives access to over 100 managers, selected among the best in the industry. With the addition of weekly liquidity**, unrivalled transparency and sophisticated monitoring features, you can invest with confidence. We offer investors much more than a platform, we offer our unrivalled experience. Think Managed Accounts, Think Lyxor. HedgeWeek Best Managed Account Platform 2012 • HFMWeek Most Innovative Managed Account Platform 2012 • The Hedge Fund Journal The Leading Managed Account Platform 2012 • Hedge Funds Review #1 Managed Account Platform from Hedge Fund/FoHF viewpoint Dec 2011 For more information visit www.lyxor.com or email [email protected] * As at 31st December 2012. ** 95% of the funds on Lyxor MAP offer weekly liquidity. This material is not intended for use by or targeted at retail customers. It is neither an offer, nor a solicitation, advice or recommendation for the purchase or sale of any securities, financial instruments or investment solutions in any jurisdiction, including the United States, or to enter into any transaction. Securities or financial instruments may not be offered or sold in any jurisdiction, including the United States, absent registration or an exemption from registration under applicable regulations. This material is issued by Lyxor Asset Management S.A., 17 cours Valmy, 92987 Paris
    [Show full text]
  • Speed of Trade and Arbitrage Ariel Lohr, September 2018 Abstract: We
    Speed Of Trade And Arbitrage Ariel Lohr, September 2018 Abstract: We employ a theoretical microstructue model with overconfident traders (Kyle, Obizhaeva, Wang 2017) to demonstrate how market differences effect an arbitrageurs abil- ity/willingness to engage in price correcting trades. The markets differ in the rates at which traders adjust their inventories towards their target levels, "trading speeds". The extent to which trading speed differences across markets effect the degree of price convergence or diver- gence depends on the arbitrageur's preexisting positions in each market. If the arbitrageur trades towards their target in each market at the same prevailing speed the prices converge. Trading speeds are found to be time invariant and the effect of a financial constraint on the arbitrageur increases in the difference between market speeds. 1 1 Introduction This paper contemplates how differences in markets effects an arbitrageurs ability or will- ingness to engage in price correcting trading, enforcing the law of one price. Theoretically if we take some arbitrary return r multiply it by the stochastic dis- count factor m and take the expectation of the product we should recover the fundamental pricing equation 1 = hmri (Cochrane 2009). Any asset pricing model, H : returns ! prices, amounts to an estimation of the homomorphism hm · i which maps elements of a return space to some price space with any r2 = ker(H) being seen as a mispricing in the eyes of the model. Since prices effect returns, asset pricing models amount to restrictions on the price gener- ating process. In reality prices are the results of trading games (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bond/Old-Bond Spread$
    Journal of Financial Economics 66 (2002) 463–506 The bond/old-bond spread$ Arvind Krishnamurthy Department of Finance, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA Abstract I document the profits on a trade that is long the old 30-year Treasury bond and short the new 30-year Treasury bond, and is rolled over every auction cycle from June 1995 to November 1999. Despite the systematic convergence of the spread over the auction cycle, the average profits are close to zero. The difference in repo-market financing rates between the two bonds is a significant cost of carry in this trade. I show that variation in the bond/old-bond spread is driven by the Treasury supply of 30-year bonds as well as aggregate factors affecting investors’ preference for liquid assets. r 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. JEL classification: G14; G18; E43; E44 Keywords: Hedge funds; Short sales; CP-Bills spread; Aggregate liquidity; Liquidity crises 1. Introduction Among the most actively traded bonds in the world is the 30-year Treasury bond. Almost since inception the 30-year Treasury bond has served as a benchmark for long term interest rates in the United States.1 The Treasury has, until recently, auctioned 30-year bonds on roughly a six-month cycle. Upon issuance, a bond is dubbed the ‘‘new bond’’ and acquires benchmark status, replacing the bond that was $I thank Phil Bond, Darrell Duffie, Andrea Eisfeldt, Ravi Jagannathan, Owen Lamont, Bob McDonald, Mitch Petersen, Todd Pulvino, Adriano Rampini, Paola Sapienza, Suresh Sundaresan, an anonymous referee, and seminar participants at the Bank of England, the Texas Finance Festival, Columbia University, University of Chicago, Northwestern University, University of Michigan, WFA 2001 conference, and the NBER 2001 Summer Institute for helpful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Risk, Market Liquidity, and Convergence Trading in the Interest Rate Swap Spread
    John Kambhu Trading Risk, Market Liquidity, and Convergence Trading in the Interest Rate Swap Spread • Trading activity is generally considered to be a 1.Introduction stabilizing force in markets; however, trading risk can sometimes lead to behavior that has he notion that markets are self-stabilizing is a basic the opposite effect. Tprecept in economics and finance. Research and policy decisions are often guided by the view that arbitrage and • An analysis of the interest rate swap market speculative activity move market prices toward fundamentally finds stabilizing as well as destabilizing forces rational values. For example, consider a decision on whether attributable to leveraged trading activity. central banks or bank regulators should intervene before a The study considers how convergence trading severe market disturbance propagates widely to the rest of the risk affects market liquidity and asset price financial system. Such a decision may rest on a judgment of volatility by examining the interest rate swap how quickly the effects of the disturbance would be countered spread and the volume of repo contracts. by equilibrating market forces exerted by investors taking the longer view. • The swap spread tends to converge to its While most economists accept the view that markets are self-stabilizing in the long run, a well-established body of normal level more slowly when traders are research exists on the ways in which destabilizing dynamics can weakened by losses, while higher trading risk persist in markets. For instance, studies on the limits of can cause the spread to diverge from that level. arbitrage show how external as well as internal constraints on trading activity can weaken the stabilizing role of speculators.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 New Trading Protocols and Technology Updates
    SEPT WED 11 FX ETRADING EVALUATION DAY 13:50 pm Industry Keynote: How can you best adapt your trading desk to the current evolving market structure, ongoing regulation and technology innovations? Danielle Caravetta, Director of Global Sales, Pragma Securities As the market structure evolves away from traditional Tier 1 bank dominance of liquidity provision, are we seeing a more level playing field between liquidity providers and liquidity takers? How far are electronic trading venues going beyond spot FX, with the e-trading of FX forwards, FX swaps and NDFs, and even OTC FX options? What are the critical success factors that will define the success or failure of current venues as we move towards more consolidation? What are the three biggest technology trends happening right now and how will they practically transform how you trade FX? 14:10 pm Buy Side Only Roundtables: Establishing the buy side wish-list - What is the key criteria you should consider when evaluating new liquidity and technology providers? Meet your roundtable - In your groups of 8-10 buy side, take the chance to introduce yourselves to each other, and collaborate to establish what the top 3 key criteria is you will all look out for when meeting the providers. 14:20 pm Afternoon Coffee Break NEW TRADING PROTOCOLS AND TECHNOLOGY UPDATES 14:50 pm Platform Presentations: What new liquidity innovation is each TCA and Algo Presentations: What new eTrading innovation is each platform promoting to improve your access to new pools? provider promoting to help you improve
    [Show full text]