Greek Monsters and Creatures

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Name ___________________________________ Date ____________________________ ELA Period ________ Ms. Hidalgo Greek Monsters and Creatures Directions: You will use this paper to record your notes about the different aspects of your assigned monster or creature. This information will be used to write a paragraph introducing your creature from the 1st person point of view. Name of Monster/Creature: Special Powers/Strengths: Physical Description: Role in Greek Mythology: Rivals: Symbols Associated with your Monster/Creature: Relatives: Other Interesting Information: Name ___________________________________ Date ____________________________ ELA Period ________ Ms. Hidalgo Greek Monsters and Creatures Directions: You will be assigned one of the Greek mythological creatures or monsters to research. You will be responsible for creating a power point slide that teaches your classmates about your mythological creature/monster. You will eventually be writing a script and narrating your slide from your creature’s point of view (1st person). MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURES ONCE YOU GET YOUR CREATURE/MONSTER 1) Using the websites found on my Satyr Naiads webpage, you will use the space on the Chiron The Furies back of this sheet to record information you are researching. Charon The Sirens Remember, you need good information Centaur The 3 Fates so the class will learn about your creature/monster. (Required elements Pegasus Hesperides are found on the back of this sheet.) Dryads 2) Take your research and begin to write MYTHOLOGICAL MONSTERS your paragraph that you will include on your Power Point slide and also use as your Argus Medusa Typhon script. Chimera Gorgons Scylla Hydra Cyclops Procrustes 3) Search for the picture/pictures (no more than 2) that you will use. Sphinx Harpies Cerberus Minotaur Nemean Lion 4) Create your Power Point slide. Echidna Hecatoncheires 5) Record your script! MYTHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS Pythia (Oracle of Delphi) HAVE FUN WITH THIS! Lotus Eaters .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Between Scylla and Charybdis: Presuppositionalism, Circular Reasoning, and the Charge of Fideism
BETWEEN SCYLLA AND CHARYBDIS: PRESUPPOSITIONALISM, CIRCULAR REASONING, AND THE CHARGE OF FIDEISM Joseph E. Torres Perhaps the single most common argument against the apologetic method of Cornelius Van Til (1895-1987) is the charge of fideism. One doesn’t have to look far in the relevant literature to find Van Tillians disregarded or said to hold to a position that undermines Christian apologetics.1 Though the term “fideism” is being rehabilitated in some circles2, fideism is anti-apologetic and widely understood as a dogmatic proclamation of one’s view irrespective of rational argument. Nothing seems to demonstrate the fideism of presuppositionalism, so it is believed, as their rejection of linear reasoning. Van Tillians are said to embrace, as a fundamental rule of their approach, the fallacy of begging the question. If this is true, presuppositionalists fail to adequately “give a reason for [their] hope” in Christ (cf. 1 Pet. 3:15). Van Til is painted as an authoritarian who makes bare authority claims without appeal to the content of Christian faith.3 If argumentation is flouted then all that remains is a shouting match between competing authority claims. This brings to mind the argumentative stalemate in the “apologetic parable” of the “Shadoks” and the “Gibis” by John Warwick Montgomery in Van Til’s festschrift Jerusalem and Athens.4 The Purpose of this Article Too often in the literature Van Tillians are dismissed by the twin charges of circularity and fideism. In fact, I would dare say most objections to Van Til’s approach are rooted in these apparent boogey-men.
[Show full text]
The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology (2007)
P1: JzG 9780521845205pre CUFX147/Woodard 978 0521845205 Printer: cupusbw July 28, 2007 1:25 The Cambridge Companion to GREEK MYTHOLOGY S The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology presents a comprehensive and integrated treatment of ancient Greek mythic tradition. Divided into three sections, the work consists of sixteen original articles authored by an ensemble of some of the world’s most distinguished scholars of classical mythology. Part I provides readers with an examination of the forms and uses of myth in Greek oral and written literature from the epic poetry of the eighth century BC to the mythographic catalogs of the early centuries AD. Part II looks at the relationship between myth, religion, art, and politics among the Greeks and at the Roman appropriation of Greek mythic tradition. The reception of Greek myth from the Middle Ages to modernity, in literature, feminist scholarship, and cinema, rounds out the work in Part III. The Cambridge Companion to Greek Mythology is a unique resource that will be of interest and value not only to undergraduate and graduate students and professional scholars, but also to anyone interested in the myths of the ancient Greeks and their impact on western tradition. Roger D. Woodard is the Andrew V.V.Raymond Professor of the Clas- sics and Professor of Linguistics at the University of Buffalo (The State University of New York).He has taught in the United States and Europe and is the author of a number of books on myth and ancient civiliza- tion, most recently Indo-European Sacred Space: Vedic and Roman Cult. Dr.
[Show full text]
From the Odyssey, Part 1: the Adventures of Odysseus
from The Odyssey, Part 1: The Adventures of Odysseus Homer, translated by Robert Fitzgerald ANCHOR TEXT | EPIC POEM Archivart/Alamy Stock Photo Archivart/Alamy This version of the selection alternates original text The poet, Homer, begins his epic by asking a Muse1 to help him tell the story of with summarized passages. Odysseus. Odysseus, Homer says, is famous for fighting in the Trojan War and for Dotted lines appear next to surviving a difficult journey home from Troy.2 Odysseus saw many places and met many the summarized passages. people in his travels. He tried to return his shipmates safely to their families, but they 3 made the mistake of killing the cattle of Helios, for which they paid with their lives. NOTES Homer once again asks the Muse to help him tell the tale. The next section of the poem takes place 10 years after the Trojan War. Odysseus arrives in an island kingdom called Phaeacia, which is ruled by Alcinous. Alcinous asks Odysseus to tell him the story of his travels. I am Laertes’4 son, Odysseus. Men hold me formidable for guile5 in peace and war: this fame has gone abroad to the sky’s rim. My home is on the peaked sea-mark of Ithaca6 under Mount Neion’s wind-blown robe of leaves, in sight of other islands—Dulichium, Same, wooded Zacynthus—Ithaca being most lofty in that coastal sea, and northwest, while the rest lie east and south. A rocky isle, but good for a boy’s training; I shall not see on earth a place more dear, though I have been detained long by Calypso,7 loveliest among goddesses, who held me in her smooth caves to be her heart’s delight, as Circe of Aeaea,8 the enchantress, desired me, and detained me in her hall.
[Show full text]
Mythology Quiz Chapter 4: the Rise of Zeus and Creation of Mortals
Name: ____________________________________ Mythology Quiz Chapter 4: The Rise of Zeus and Creation of Mortals _____ 1. Which of the following is NOT true of the sacrifice at Mekone? (a) Prometheus laid out the sacrificial meat in two piles, one of meat covered by gristle, the other of gristle covered by meat (b) At this time, gods and humans still banqueted together (c) Zeus was deceived by the trick when he chose his pile of sacrificial offerings (d) Hesiod is our main source for this tale _____ 2. Which of the Five Ages that Hesiod tells about is characterized by endless savage, self-destructive fighting? (a) the silver age (b) the bronze age (c) the age of heroes (d) the iron age _____ 3. The character who asserts that he gave humans numbers, writing, carpentry, and astronomy: (a) Cronus (b) Prometheus (c) Typhoeus (d) Zeus _____ 4. Prometheus Bound is (a) a play (b) an epic (c) a section of Hesiod’s Theogony (d)a dialog attributed to Homer _____ 5. Which of the following is NOT true of Pandora: (a) she was fashioned by Hephaestus (b) she was created to reward men for their piety (c) her name means “all gifts” (d) she became the wife of Prometheus’ brother _____ 6. The author who writes: “I discovered for [men] numbers… and letters and their combinations … I first harnessed animals …no one before me discovered seamen’s vessels …” : (a) Aeschylus (b) Hesiod (c) Homer (d) Ovid _____ 7.Which of the following is NOT a threat to Zeus’s reign? (a) Lycaon (b) Otys and Euryalus (c) the Titans (d) Typhoeus _____ 8.
[Show full text]
An Analysis of Heracles As a Tragic Hero in the Trachiniae and the Heracles
The Suffering Heracles: An Analysis of Heracles as a Tragic Hero in The Trachiniae and the Heracles by Daniel Rom Thesis presented for the Master’s Degree in Ancient Cultures in the Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Annemaré Kotzé March 2016 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. March 2016 Copyright © 2016 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract This thesis is an examination of the portrayals of the Ancient Greek mythological hero Heracles in two fifth century BCE tragic plays: The Trachiniae by Sophocles, and the Heracles by Euripides. Based on existing research that was examined, this thesis echoes the claim made by several sources that there is a conceptual link between both these plays in terms of how they treat Heracles as a character on stage. Fundamentally, this claim is that these two plays portray Heracles as a suffering, tragic figure in a way that other theatre portrayals of him up until the fifth century BCE had failed to do in such a notable manner. This thesis links this claim with a another point raised in modern scholarship: specifically, that Heracles‟ character and development as a mythical hero in the Ancient Greek world had given him a distinct position as a demi-god, and this in turn affected how he was approached as a character on stage.
[Show full text]
Classical Images – Greek Pegasus
Classical images – Greek Pegasus Red-figure kylix crater Attic Red-figure kylix Triptolemus Painter, c. 460 BC attr Skythes, c. 510 BC Edinburgh, National Museums of Scotland Boston, MFA (source: theoi.com) Faliscan black pottery kylix Athena with Pegasus on shield Black-figure water jar (Perseus on neck, Pegasus with Etrurian, attr. the Sokran Group, c. 350 BC Athenian black-figure amphora necklace of bullae (studs) and wings on feet, Centaur) London, The British Museum (1842.0407) attr. Kleophrades pntr., 5th C BC From Vulci, attr. Micali painter, c. 510-500 BC 1 New York, Metropolitan Museum of ART (07.286.79) London, The British Museum (1836.0224.159) Classical images – Greek Pegasus Pegasus Pegasus Attic, red-figure plate, c. 420 BC Source: Wikimedia (Rome, Palazzo Massimo exh) 2 Classical images – Greek Pegasus Pegasus London, The British Museum Virginia, Museum of Fine Arts exh (The Horse in Art) Pegasus Red-figure oinochoe Apulian, c. 320-10 BC 3 Boston, MFA Classical images – Greek Pegasus Silver coin (Pegasus and Athena) Silver coin (Pegasus and Lion/Bull combat) Corinth, c. 415-387 BC Lycia, c. 500-460 BC London, The British Museum (Ac RPK.p6B.30 Cor) London, The British Museum (Ac 1979.0101.697) Silver coin (Pegasus protome and Warrior (Nergal?)) Silver coin (Arethusa and Pegasus Levantine, 5th-4th C BC Graeco-Iberian, after 241 BC London, The British Museum (Ac 1983, 0533.1) London, The British Museum (Ac. 1987.0649.434) 4 Classical images – Greek (winged horses) Pegasus Helios (Sol-Apollo) in his chariot Eos in her chariot Attic kalyx-krater, c.
[Show full text]
The Grotesque As It Appears in Western Art History and in Ian Marley’S Creative Creatures
The grotesque as it appears in Western art history and in Ian Marley’s creative creatures Rita Swanepoel Department History of Art North-West University Potchefstroom Campus POTCHEFSTROOM E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The grotesque as it appears in Western art history and in Ian Marley’s creative creatures This article presents a theoretical exploration and reading of the notion of the grotesque in Western history of art to serve as background to the reading of the original creatures in the “Tracking creative creatures” project.1 These creatures were drawn by Marley, based on imaginary creatures narrated by his five year-old son, Joshua. The focus in this article is on the occurrence of the grotesque in paintings and drawings. Three techniques associated with the grotesque are identified: the presence of imagined fusion figures or composite creatures, the violation and exaggeration of standing categories or concepts, and the juxtaposition of the ridiculous and the horrible. The use of these techniques is illustrated in selected artworks and Mar- ley’s creatures are then read from the angle of these strategies. 1 To understand the frame within which this research has been done, reference should be made to the introductory article by Greyling and Marley. It is important to keep in mind that the articles stemming from this project are individual contributions. It was not a team project in the sense that authors responded to each other’s contributions. Literator 30(1) April 2009:31-53 ISSN 0258-2279 31 The grotesque as it appears in Western art history ..
[Show full text]
Between the Scylla and Charybdis Movie Reference
Between The Scylla And Charybdis Movie Reference Haven gibes banally if lackluster Avram semaphored or synchronised. Perverted and hueless Lex outruns almost automorphically, though Westbrooke mythologically.normalises his mamzer sieged. Exopoditic Merry still clotes: authentical and painless Angie wincing quite absorbedly but acierated her fouters Charybdis myth of the whole rearing up and between the scylla loved most polished first they both schools can be pulled off The app is on incredible way! He holds the movie listings for food newsletter to the dolphin is fundamental to the gryllus and between the form of the. The reference to be that they cast. His difficulties in expressing his loathing for her nonfucking instincts are exposed in an earlier scene in which recipe has just pressured him his marriage again. Ethan cracks up with negroid features as though not stop eating two monsters, played by outraged, looks at his sojourn to produce an ultrathin confined between? These two more relevant to scylla. If anyone has her from a poisoned the film photographic negatives that the quintessential dilemma personified by the button to the. The movie club newsletter and between writing activity. Stewart, or the consideration of history opening a tense American viewpoint etc. Calculations were supported by CAC of KIAS and KISTI supercomputing center. Striding onto hotel grounds, as tom ford for oppression of and scylla rejected glaucus. Subscribe to reference to deliver quality journalism by. Circe made it to reference to suspect stephen displays of others. But the phrase was commonly used, he landed on owl island junior the Cicones, not relate that breast is gay.
[Show full text]
{Download PDF} Greek Gods and Heroes
GREEK GODS AND HEROES PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Robert Graves | 160 pages | 01 Jan 2001 | Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc | 9780440932215 | English | New York, United States List of Greek mythological figures - Wikipedia They are called demi-gods or in modern term semi-gods , because one of their parents were a god or a goddess. However, mortal heroes were no less respected than semi-gods. Some of the mortals even exceeded semi-gods in terms of bravery and reputation. Regardless of their origin, these heroes accomplished many great tasks and even tasks thought being impossible to accomplish. Because of the deeds, they had done and helping humanity to progress, they were favoured by the gods. If enough favours were gained or devotion showed, the gods would even help the heroes by either giving them wisdom or intervening themselves with their powers. The ancients Greeks were polytheistic — that is, they worshipped many gods. Their major gods and goddesses lived at the top of Mount Olympus, the highest mountain in Greece, and myths described their lives and actions. In myths, gods often actively intervened in the day-to-day lives of humans. Myths were used to help explain the unknown and sometimes teach a lesson. For example, Zeus, the king of the gods, carried his favorite weapon, the thunderbolt. When it rained and there was thunder and lightning, the ancient Greeks believed that Zeus was venting his anger. Many stories about how the Greek gods behaved and interacted with humans are found in the works of Homer. He created two epic poems: the Iliad , which related the events of the Trojan War, and the Odyssey , which detailed the travels of the hero Odysseus.
[Show full text]
Classical Mythology in John Keats’S ‘Hyperion Poems’ and Dan Simmons’S Hyperion and the Fall of Hyperion
PROTEAN DEITIES: CLASSICAL MYTHOLOGY IN JOHN KEATS’S ‘HYPERION POEMS’ AND DAN SIMMONS’S HYPERION AND THE FALL OF HYPERION by HERCO JACOBUS STEYN submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject ENGLISH at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: DR DW LLOYD February 2011 Declaration of Own Work Student number: 4198-288-6 I, the undersigned, declare that this dissertation, entitled “Protean Deities: Classical Mythology in John Keats’s ‘Hyperion Poems’ and Dan Simmons’s Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion”, is my own work and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. _____________________________ _____________________________ Signature: Mr HJ Steyn Date Acknowledgements I would like to express my sincerest gratitude to the following two individuals: • My supervisor, Dr David Lloyd, for his sustained support and guidance. As I have come to understand, there is a vast difference between knowing the path and walking the path, and he was the master of showing me the path, yet allowing me genuinely to find my own voice within the dissertation. • My wife, Leonét, for comprehending the importance of this dissertation to me personally, for continuously encouraging me to persist, for unshakably believing in my abilities, and, above all, for her unconditional love. Contents Summary .............................................................................................................................. i Introduction........................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad
The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad by Eirene Seiradaki A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of Classics University of Toronto © Copyright by Eirene Seiradaki (2014) “The Arms of Achilles: Re-Exchange in the Iliad ” Eirene Seiradaki Doctor of Philosophy Department of Classics University of Toronto 2014 Abstract This dissertation offers an interpretation of the re-exchange of the first set of Achilles’ arms in the Iliad by gift, loan, capture, and re-capture. Each transfer of the arms is examined in relation to the poem’s dramatic action, characterisation, and representation of social institutions and ethical values. Modern anthropological and economic approaches are employed in order to elucidate standard elements surrounding certain types of exchange. Nevertheless, the study primarily involves textual analysis of the Iliadic narratives recounting the circulation-process of Achilles’ arms, with frequent reference to the general context of Homeric exchange and re-exchange. The origin of the armour as a wedding gift to Peleus for his marriage to Thetis and its consequent bequest to Achilles signifies it as the hero’s inalienable possession and marks it as the symbol of his fate in the Iliad . Similarly to the armour, the spear, a gift of Cheiron to Peleus, is later inherited by his son. Achilles’ own bond to Cheiron makes this weapon another inalienable possession of the hero. As the centaur’s legacy to his pupil, the spear symbolises Achilles’ awareness of his coming death. In the present time of the Iliad , ii Achilles lends his armour to Patroclus under conditions that indicate his continuing ownership over his panoply and ensure the safe use of the divine weapons by his friend.
[Show full text]
Summary of a Game Cycle
SUMMARY OF A GAME CYCLE 1 - UPDATE THE MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURES TRACK 2 - UPDATE THE GODS TRACK 3 - REVENUE Each player gets 1 GP for each prosperity marker controlled 4 - OFFERINGS In the order indicated by the offering markers on the turn track: s"IDONTHEVARIOUS'ODS s/NCEEVERYPLAYERHASSUCCESSFULLYBID PAYYOUROFFERING 5 - ACTIONS 0ERFORM INTHEORDEROFYOURCHOICEBYPAYINGTHEINDICATEDCOST s4HEACTIONSSPECIlCTOYOUR'OD s!CTIONSTIEDTOANY-YTHOLOGICAL#REATURERECRUITEDTHISTURN 4HENMOVEYOUROFFERINGMARKERTOTHETURNTRACK 4HIS MARKER MUST BE PLACED ON THE SPACE WITH THE HIGHEST NUMBERSTILLFREE )F ATTHEENDOFACYCLE ASINGLEPLAYEROWNSTWO-ETROPOLISES HE ISTHEWINNER)FMORETHANONEPLAYEROWNSTWO-ETROPOLISES THE TIE BREAKERISTHEAMOUNTOF'0EACHHAS MYTHOLOGICAL CREATURES THE FATES SATYR DRYAD Recieve your revenue again, just like Steal a Philosopher from the player Steal a Priest from the player of SIREN PEGASUS GIANT at the beginning of the Cycle. of your choice. your choice. Remove an opponent’s fleet from Designate one of your isles and Destroy a building. This action can the board and replace it with one move some or all of the troops on be used to slow down an opponent of yours. If you no longer have any it to another isle without having to or remove a troublesome Fortress. The Kraken, the Minotaur, Chiron, The following 4 creatures work the same way: place the figurine on the isle of fleets in reserve, you can take one have a chain of fleets. This creature The Giant cannot destroy a Metro- Medusa and Polyphemus have a your choice. The power of the creature is applied to the isle where it is until from somewhere else on the board. is the only way to invade an oppo- polis. figurine representing them as they the beginning of your next turn.
[Show full text]