DOCSLIB.ORG

Lesbians Visibility and Lesbophobia in France

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lesbians Visibility and Lesbophobia in France Visibility As a lesbian, you consider yourself visible : Through your cultural activities or activism (over the past two years) : Through speech : Within your friend circles : You have gone out to lesbian specific places (bars, With all your friends .................................... 65 % restaurants, clubs...) : With the majority ........................................ 22 % Yes ................................................................. 66 % With a few of them ..................................... 11 % No ................................................................. 33 % With none .................................................... 1 % Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % Lutte contre la lesbophobie, la gayphobie, la biphobie et la transphobie Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % You have read lesbian magazines : Within your family : Yes ................................................................. 63 % With all the members .................................. 26 % No ................................................................. 36 % Survey With the majority ........................................ 28 % Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % With a few of them ..................................... 33 % You have been part of an LGBT Internet community Lesbians visibility and With none .................................................... 13 % (dating websites, socializing websites, etc.) : At work : Yes ................................................................. 52 % lesbophobia in France With all of your co-workers......................... 18 % No ................................................................. 47 % With the majority ........................................ 24 % Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % With a few of them ..................................... 38 % With none .................................................... 20 % You have joined an activist or LGBT-friendly 7 126 participants organization : In your neighbourhood : Yes ................................................................. 24 % With all of the neighbours .......................... 14 % No ................................................................. 75 % 59 % have been victims of lesbophobia With the majority ........................................ 10 % Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % over the past two years. With a few of them ..................................... 21 % With none .................................................... 54 % Through your look : Would rather not answer ............................ 1 % According to gender stereotypes, you describe 18 % never engage Within the medical community : yourself as : in public demonstrations With all of your therapists .......................... 32 % Feminine ....................................................... 53 % of affection. With the majority ........................................ 19 % Androgynous ................................................ 25 % With a few of them ..................................... 25 % Masculine ..................................................... 10 % With none .................................................... 24 % Very feminine ............................................... 8 % Through gesture : Other ............................................................ 3 % You hold hands with your partner in public : Very masculine ............................................. 1 % What is lesbophobia ? Depending on the context ............................ 54 % Your hair is : It is a form of social stigma against lesbians and women respondents. Yes ................................................................... 25 % Short ............................................................. 34 % thought to be lesbians. It is expressed through negative stereo- 126 No .................................................................... 21 % Medium ........................................................ 33 % types such as «lesbians are truck drivers», «between two wo- You kiss your partner in public : Long .............................................................. 30 % men, it’s actually not really sexual intercourse», verbal abuse, Depending on the context ............................ 53 % Shaved .......................................................... 2 % such as insults, threats, mockery, physical aggressions (punches, Yes ................................................................... 21 % Other. ............................................................ 1 % wounds, rapes, murders etc.) and psychological violence. It No .................................................................... 26 % is also expressed through multiple types of discriminations : You wear clothes that are (multiple answers are rdenial of service (in restaurants/hotels) or paid holidays... And You do not show any type of affection to your partner possible) : this, in all dimensions of life: the public sphere, families, friends, in public fearing hostile reactions: Unisex ........................................................... 55 % work, neighbourhood and health...As gayphobia, transphobia Yes ................................................................... 63 % Feminine ....................................................... 52 % and biphobia, lesbophobia is a very specific phenomenon. EIt No .................................................................... 31 % Masculine ..................................................... 16 % is related to how a specific society judges the fact of being a Would rather not answer .............................. 6 % *The answers were given by the 7 Other ............................................................ 2 % homosexual woman. Consequences : Lesbophobia you have had more difficulties in openly Respondents’ profiles living your homosexuality ............................. 35 % Over the past two years, Age : mostly under 30 years old you have suffered from depression .............35 % - de 30 ys old 30-60 ys old + de 60 ys old you have been confronted to lesbophobia* : your studies has been affected ..................... 34 % 60 % 38 % 2% 45 % in the public sphere 6 % from friends and close circles Place of residency : urban and regional areas Manifestations : Manifestations : 60% live outside of the Ile-de-France, 30% in the Île-de- insults .............................................................. 74 % lack of understanding .................................... 62 % France and 5% in French overseas territories and abroad. mockeries ........................................................ 47 % hat section. rejection .......................................................... 51 % 45% live in cities of over 200,000 inhabitants. lack of understanding .................................... 23 % nclude the 4,222 mockeries ........................................................ 46 % Relationship status : Single and with no children Consequences : 70% are declared single, 13% in a civil partnership, 11% Consequences : you have had more difficulties in openly in a common-law marriage and 1% are married. A little you have cut ties with some of your living your homosexuality ............................. 29 % over 10 % of the respondents have one or more friends ............................................................. 34 % you are anxious .............................................. 23 % you have had more difficulties in openly children. you have suffered from depression .............. 10 % living your homosexuality ............................. 31 % Sexual orientation : lesbians you are anxious .............................................. 23 % 78 % define themselves as lesbians, 14 % within their family 16 % as bisexuals, 1 % heterosexuals and 5 % as other or undefined. Manifestations : 3 % on Internet Professional situation : lack of understanding ................................72 % Manifestations : 36 % are students. 21 % are employed, rejection .......................................................... 66 % insults .............................................................. 70 % 20 % are senior managers and professionnal. insults .............................................................. 38 % rejection .......................................................... 55 % Consequences : discriminations ............................................... 26 % you have cut ties with some of your The conduct of the survey Consequences : loved ones ....................................................... 41 % The gathering of data for the survey was conducted you are anxious .............................................. 32 % you have had more difficulties in openly from march 30th to july 20th 2013, via the Internet you have had more difficulties in openly living your homosexuality ............................. 38 % using SOS homophobie’s website, as well as via other living your homosexuality ............................. 26 % you have suffered from depression .............. 37 % tools of broadcast, throughout the country: stands you have closed yourself up ......................... 16 % at LGBT events, meetings with respondents in public areas, presentation of the questionnaire to other 11 % at work 3 % from the neighbourhood organizations.. Manifestations : Manifestations : mockeries ........................................................ 48 % insults .............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Butch-Femme by Teresa Theophano
    Butch-Femme by Teresa Theophano Encyclopedia Copyright © 2015, glbtq, Inc. Entry Copyright © 2004, glbtq, inc. Reprinted from http://www.glbtq.com A butch-femme couple The concept of butch and femme identities have long been hotly debated within the participating in a group lesbian community, yet even achieving a consensus as to exactly what the terms wedding ceremony in "butch" and "femme" mean can be extraordinarily difficult. In recent years, these Taiwan. words have come to describe a wide spectrum of individuals and their relationships. It is easiest, then, to begin with an examination of butch-femme culture and meaning from a historical perspective. Butch and femme emerged in the early twentieth century as a set of sexual and emotional identities among lesbians. To give a general but oversimplified idea of what butch-femme entails, one might say that butches exhibit traditionally "masculine" traits while femmes embody "feminine" ones. Although oral histories have demonstrated that butch-femme couples were seen in America as far back as the turn of the twentieth century, and that they were particularly conspicuous in the 1930s, it is the mid-century working-class and bar culture that most clearly illustrate the archetypal butch-femme dynamic. Arguably, during the period of the 1940s through the early 1960s, butches and femmes were easiest to recognize and characterize: butches with their men's clothing, DA haircuts, and suave manners often found their more traditionally styled femme counterparts, wearing dresses, high heels, and makeup, in the gay bars. A highly visible and accepted way of living within the lesbian community, butch-femme was in fact considered the norm among lesbians during the 1950s.
    [Show full text]
  • Written Out: How Sexuality Is Used to Attack Women's Organizing
    REVISED AND UPDATED A Report of the and the International Gay and Lesbian Center for Women’s Human Rights Commission Global Leadership written out how sexuality is used to attack women’s organizing Written and researched by Cynthia Rothschild Edited and with contributions by Scott Long and Susana T. Fried A revised publication of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) and the Center for Women's Global Leadership (CWGL) International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission table of contents The mission of the International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) is to secure the full enjoyment of the human rights of all people and communities subject to discrimination or abuse on the basis of sexual orientation or expression, gender identity or expression, and/or HIV sta- Preface to 2005 Edition . .1 tus. A US-based non-profit, non-governmental organization (NGO), IGLHRC effects this mission Introduction . .3 through advocacy, documentation, coalition building, public education, and technical assistance. I “How Can There Be Names For What Does Not Exist?” . .25 International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission The Target: Women’s Organizing, Women’s Bodies . .25 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th Floor Sexual Rights . .35 New York, New York 10118 USA Tel: 212-216-1814 Basics of Baiting: Internationalizing Intolerance . .41 Fax: 212-216-1876 The Effects: Internalizing Fear . .53 [email protected] http://www.iglhrc.org II Women Make Cookies: Discrediting of Women Leaders . .65 III “We Would Have a Hard Time Going Home”: Fear of Sexuality in the International Sphere” . .83 Center for Women’s Global Leadership The Center for Women’s Global Leadership (Global Center) develops and facilitates women’s leader- Beijing: The Right Wing Takes on Human Rights .
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for Football Governing Bodies on Lgbt Inclusion and the Prevention of Discrimination and Violence Impressum
    PRIDE IN SPORT Preventing and fighting homophobic violence and discriminations in sport GUIDANCE FOR FOOTBALL GOVERNING BODIES ON LGBT INCLUSION AND THE PREVENTION OF DISCRIMINATION AND VIOLENCE IMPRESSUM Guidance for Football Governing Bodies on LGBT Inclusion and the Prevention of Discrimination and Violence Publisher and Copyright: European Gay & Lesbian Sport Federation (EGLSF) Author: Megan Worthing-Davies Contributor: Juliette Jacques Design: Jen Watts Design Printed: 2013 in Ljubljana, Slovenia 150 copies Funded by: European Commission ISBN: 978-90-820842-0-7 This publication is free of charge. Disclaimer: The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors. The content of this publication may be freely reproduced and modified for non-commercial purposes under Creative Commons Licence Attribution- NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (acknowledging the author and listing the source). More information: www.prideinsport.info CONTENTS 1 WHAT ARE THE ISSUES? (6) • What do the terms lesbian, gay, bisexual and trans or transgender mean? (7) • How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender (LGBT)? (7) • What is homophobia, lesbophobia, biphobia and transphobia? (8) • How does discrimination affect LGBT people and their participation in sport? (9) • A framework for addressing homophobia, lesbophobia, biphobia and transphobia in football (11) 2 TAKING ACTION (20) • A framework for addressing homophobia,
    [Show full text]
  • LGBT Rights: Frequently Asked Questions
    FACT SHEET LGBT Rights: Frequently Asked Questions What does “LGBT” mean? but were classified as males when they were born. LGBT stands for “lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender.” Transmen identify as men but were classified female While these terms have increasing global resonance, in when they were born. Some transgender people seek different cultures other terms may be used to describe surgery or take hormones to bring their body into people who form same-sex relationships and those who alignment with their gender identity; others do not. exhibit non-binary gender identities (such as hijra, meti, lala, skesana, motsoalle, mithli, kuchu, kawein, travesty, muxé, What is intersex? fa’afafine, fakaleiti, hamjensgara and Two-Spirit). In a human An intersex person is born with sexual anatomy, reproductive rights context, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender organs, and/or chromosome patterns that do not fit the people face both common and distinct challenges. Intersex typical definition of male or female. This may be apparent people (those born with atypical sex characteristics) suffer at birth or become so later in life. An intersex person may many of the same kinds of human rights violations as LGBT identify as male or female or as neither. Intersex status people, as indicated below. is not about sexual orientation or gender identity: intersex people experience the same range of sexual orientations What is “sexual orientation”? and gender identities as non-intersex people. Sexual orientation refers to a person’s physical, romantic and/or emotional attraction towards other people. Everyone What are homophobia and transphobia? has a sexual orientation, which is integral to a person’s Homophobia is an irrational fear of, hatred or aversion identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Lesbian Genders: a Queer/Sociological Approach
    Contemporary Lesbian Genders: A Queer/Sociological Approach Alison Jane Eves Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds Department of Sociology and Social Policy March 2002 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. 'Contemporary Lesbian Genders: A Queer/Sociological Approach' Alison Eves: University of Leeds identity has been This thesis attempts to develop the insights of recent work on that influenced by poststructuralist theory, and in particular 'queer theory', through an I empirical study of the social construction of lesbian genders. examine sociological work Lesbian identities on sexuality, queer theory and feminist work on butch/femme. are constructed at the intersection of specific discourses, structures and conscious agency. There is a lack of sociological element in queer theory but I am interested in the potential for developing this despite the epistemological difficulties it raises. Queer theory has enabled a radically different way of theorising butch/femme as transgressive queer practice with the potential to reveal the constructed and contingent nature of all gender. The study has involved semi-structured interviews with 31 women who have various degrees of identification with either `butch' or `femme'. I identify particular `interpretative repertoires' in identity narratives and examine the ways in which these are socially located. These findings are used to contest the assertion that community is dominant understandings of identities differ radically from the constructionism that the theoretical paradigm. I outline the construction of specific contemporary butch and femme subject positions and the ways in which these are discursively located in relation to heteronormative discourses.
    [Show full text]
  • CCGSD Queer Vocabulary
    CCGSD Queer Vocabulary Note about Terminology It is important to acknowledge that due to the evolving nature of language and the personal meanings attributed by groups and individuals, these definitions are not rigid - they are mutable and ever changing, much like our community itself. When referring to an individual’s identity, the words and definitions that they use to describe themselves overrule and supercede the definitions in this glossary. AGENDER (adjective) ​ A term meaning “without gender,” people who are agender do not identify anywhere on the gender spectrum, but rather see their gender as non existent.1 ALLOSEXUAL (adjective) ​ A word to describe those who are not on the asexual spectrum. Other terms for this include zedsexual, ​ ​ ​ ​ zsexual, or non-ace, which are less sexological in nature.2 ​ ​ ​ ANDROGYNOUS (adjective) ​ Identity or umbrella term for a kind of non-binary gender implying some combination of conventionally masculine and feminine aspects.3 AROMANTIC (adjective) ​ A term used to describe those who do not experience romantic attraction.4 ASEXUAL (adjective) ​ A term used to describe a person who either: 1. Does not experience sexual attraction 2. Does not experience a desire for sex, or 3. Experiences these to a lesser degree than most 5 ASSIGNED SEX (noun) ​ ​ Assigned sex is the classification of a person as male, female or intersex based on biological characteristics, including chromosomes, hormones, external genitalia and reproductive organs, often at birth. We say assigned sex versus biological sex to acknowledge that sex is often a value assigned by medical professionals to newborns based on visual assessment of external genitalia.
    [Show full text]
  • “Grisley L Business”
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository 10 ‘Grisley “L” business’1? Re-Valuing Female Masculinity and Butch Subjectivity in Tipping the Velvet and The Night Watch Claire O’Callaghan According to the lesbian cultural critic Emma Healey, the figure of the butch lesbian not only carries ‘the weight of nearly one hundred years of stereotyping on her shoulders’, but suffers homophobic ‘scorn and ridicule’ from heterosexist culture as well as ‘internalised lesbophobia’ within lesbian communities.2 As Gayle Rubin indicates, the term ‘butch’ is ‘the lesbian vernacular for women who are more comfortable with masculine gender codes, styles or identities than with feminine ones’ and ‘encompasses a variety of ways of and motivations for using masculine gender codes and preferences’.3 Butchness exists, therefore, as Jack Halberstam points out, on a varied continuum of female masculinities that signify ‘differently gendered bodies’ and female subjectivities.4 Boyish, masculine and/or butch women feature in nearly all of Sarah Waters’s novels. In Tipping the Velvet (1998), Nancy King’s foray into the world of music hall male impersonation and her investment in modes of female masculinity facilitate her discovery of lesbian desire and, as I will discuss later, are integral to her expression of gender and her sexual coming-of-age. Likewise, in Affinity (1999), domestic servant Ruth Vigers is able to pass as male spirit ‘Peter Quick’ in part because of her
    [Show full text]
  • From Here to Queer: Radical Feminism, Postmodernism, and The
    From Here to Queer: Radical Feminism, Postmodernism, and the Lesbian Menace (Or, Why Can't a Woman Be More like a Fag?) Author(s): Suzanna Danuta Walters Source: Signs, Vol. 21, No. 4, Feminist Theory and Practice (Summer, 1996), pp. 830-869 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3175026 . Accessed: 24/06/2014 17:21 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Signs. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 199.79.170.81 on Tue, 24 Jun 2014 17:21:49 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions FromHere to Queer: Radical Feminism,Postmodernism, and the Lesbian Menace (Or, WhyCan't a Woman Be More Like a Fag?) Suzanna Danuta Walters Queer defined (NOT!) A LREADY, IN THIS OPENING, I am treadingon thin ice: how to definethat which exclaims-with postmodern cool-its absoluteundefinability? We maybe here(and we may be queer and not going shopping),but we are certainlynot transparentor easily available to anyone outside the realm of homo cognoscenti.Yet definitions,even of the tentativesort, are importantif we are to push forwardthis new discourseand debate meaningfullyits parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Femalemasculi Ni Ty
    FEMALE MASCULINITY © 1998 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper oo Designed by Amy Ruth Buchanan Frontispiece: Sadie Lee, Raging Bull (1994) Typeset in Scala by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. FOR GAYAT RI CONTENTS Illustrations ix Preface xi 1 An Introduction to Female Masculinity: Masculinity without Men r 2 Perverse Presentism: The Androgyne, the Tribade, the Female Husband, and Other Pre-Twentieth-Century Genders 45 3 "A Writer of Misfits": John Radclyffe Hall and the Discourse of Inversion 7 5 4 Lesbian Masculinity: Even Stone Butches Get the Blues nr 5 Transgender Butch: Butch/FTM Border Wars and the Masculine Continuum 141 6 Looking Butch: A Rough Guide to Butches on Film 175 7 Drag Kings: Masculinity and Performance 231 viii · Contents 8 Raging Bull (Dyke): New Masculinities 267 Notes 279 Bibliography 307 Filmography 319 Index 323 IL LUSTRATIONS 1 Julie Harris as Frankie Addams and Ethel Waters as Bernice in The Member of the Wedding (1953) 7 2 Queen Latifahas Cleo in Set It Off(19 97) 30 3 Drag king Mo B. Dick 31 4 Peggy Shaw's publicity poster (1995) 31 5 "Ingin," fromthe series "Being and Having," by Catherine Opie (1991) 32 6 "Whitey," fromthe series "Being and Having," by Catherine Opie (1991) 33 7 "Mike and Sky," by Catherine Opie (1993) 34 8 "Jack's Back II," by Del Grace (1994) 36 9 "Jackie II," by Del Grace (1994) 37 10 "Dyke," by Catherine Opie (1992) 39 11 "Self-
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbian Lives and Rights in Chatelaine
    From No Go to No Logo: Lesbian Lives and Rights in Chatelaine Barbara M. Freeman Carleton University Abstract: This study is a feminist cultural and critical analysis of articles about lesbians and their rights that appeared in Chatelaine magazine between 1966 and 2004. It explores the historical progression of their media representation, from an era when lesbians were pitied and barely tolerated, through a period when their struggles for their legal rights became paramount, to the turn of the present cen- tury when they were displaced by post-modern fashion statements about the “flu- idity” of sexual orientation, and stripped of their identity politics. These shifts in media representation have had as much to do with marketing the magazine as with its liberal editors’ attempts to deal with lesbian lives and rights in ways that would appeal to readers. At the heart of this overview is a challenge to both the media and academia to reclaim lesbians in all their diversity in their real histori- cal and contemporary contexts. Résumé : Cette étude propose une analyse critique et culturelle féministe d’ar- ticles publiés dans le magazine Châtelaine entre 1966 et 2004, qui traitent des droits des lesbiennes. Elle explore l’évolution historique de leur représentation dans les médias, de l’époque où les lesbiennes étaient tout juste tolérées, à une période où leur lutte pour leurs droits légaux devint prépondérante, jusqu’au tournant de ce siècle où elles ont été dépouillées de leur politique identitaire et « déplacées » par des éditoriaux postmodernes de la mode sur la « fluidité » de leur orientation sexuelle.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbophobia As a Barrier to Women in Coaching Tracy Keats
    Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 8 March 2016 Lesbophobia as a Barrier to Women in Coaching Tracy Keats Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/taboo Recommended Citation Keats, T. (2017). Lesbophobia as a Barrier to Women in Coaching. Taboo: The Journal of Culture and Education, 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.31390/taboo.15.1.08 Taboo,Tracy Spring Keats 2016 79 Lesbophobia as a Barrier to Women in Coaching Tracy Keats Abstract This article explores the challenges of female coaches in the heterosexual male-dominated institution of sport. The central contention is that homophobia, an irrational fear of and negative attitude towards homosexuals, and particularly lesbophobia, fear and negativity towards lesbians, impedes all female coaching careers. This investigation of homonegative barriers to women coaches stresses the importance of acknowledging and dismantling homophobia within a hegemonic sport culture in order to create safer, more equitable and more welcoming sports environments for women, regardless of sexual orientation. Introduction The emergence of Facebook as communication media has allowed me to re- connect with a high school friend I used to play softball with—Pat.1 In the small, overwhelmingly White, middle class town of Gander, Newfoundland, Pat stood out as a rare deviation from heterosexual and gender norms. She donned boyish clothes, cropped her hair, and never applied make-up. Pat refused to conform to a societal expectation of femininity, no matter how much her mother pleaded and regardless of scrutiny she faced in our community. It was obvious that Pat struggled, internally and externally, with her sexual and gender identity, and I vividly recall the intensity of my empathy for her.
    [Show full text]
  • Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth in the Juvenile Justice System
    11 A GUIDE TO JUVENILE DETENTION REFORM Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Youth in the Juvenile Justice System Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative A PROJECT OF THE ANNIE E. CASEY FOUNDATION juvenile detention alternatives initiative This is the 11th in a series of practice guides published as part of JDAI, an initiative for juvenile justice reform of the Annie E. Casey Foundation. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Annie E. Casey Foundation is a private philanthropy that creates a brighter future for the nation’s children by developing solutions to strengthen families, build paths to economic opportunity and transform struggling communities into safer and healthier places to live, work and grow. For more information, visit www.aecf.org. ABOUT THE AUTHOR This practice guide was written by Shannan Wilber, youth policy director at the National Center for Lesbian Rights. © 2015 The Annie E. Casey Foundation contents 2 Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender 14 SECTION IV Youth in the Juvenile Justice System Creating a Fair, Inclusive and Respectful Organizational Culture 3 SECTION 1 Introduction 24 SECTION V Detention Standards 6 SECTION II Understanding Sexual Orientation, 36 SECTION VI Gender Identity and Gender Expression Endnotes (SOGIE) 41 SECTION VII 9 SECTION III Appendix Profile of LGBT Youth in the Juvenile Justice System JUVENILE DETENTION ALTERNATIVES INITIATIVE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER YOUTH IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM The Annie E. Casey Foundation has developed this practice guide to support Juvenile Detention Alternative Initiative (JDAI) sites in meeting their obligation to ensure the safety and well-being of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT)* youth involved in the juvenile justice system.
    [Show full text]