DOCSLIB.ORG

99 Subpart B—Importation Or Shipment of Injurious Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
99 Subpart B—Importation Or Shipment of Injurious Wildlife U.S. Fish and Wildlife Serv., Interior § 16.12 continental United States, the District regulations under part 14 of this chap- of Columbia, Hawaii, the Common- ter. wealth of Puerto Rico, or any territory [39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, as amended at 47 FR or possession of the United States by 56362, Dec. 16, 1982; 67 FR 39868, June 11, 2002] any means whatsoever, is prohibited except for certain purposes and under § 16.12 Importation of live wild birds certain conditions as hereinafter pro- or their eggs. vided in this part: Provided, That the (a) The importation, transportation, provisions of this section shall not or acquisition is prohibited of any live apply to psittacine birds (see also specimen or egg of (1) the species of so- §§ 16.32 and 16.33 for other exemptions). called ‘‘pink starling’’ or ‘‘rosy pastor’’ Sturnus roseus; (2) the species of dioch Subpart B—Importation or (including the subspecies black-front- ed, red-billed, or Sudan dioch) Quelea Shipment of Injurious Wildlife quelea; (3) any species of Java sparrow, Padda oryzivora; (4) the species of red- § 16.11 Importation of live wild mam- whiskered bul-bul, Pycnonotus jocosus: mals. Provided, That the Director shall issue (a) The importation, transportation, permits authorizing the importation, or acquisition is prohibited of live transportation, and possession of such specimens of: (1) Any species of so- live birds under the terms and condi- called ‘‘flying fox’’ or fruit bat of the tions set forth in § 16.22. genus Pteropus; (2) any species of mon- (b) Upon the filing of a written dec- goose or meerkat of the genera Atilax, laration with the District Director of Cynictis, Helogale, Herpestes, Ichneumia, Customs at the port of entry as re- Mungos, and Suricata; (3) any species of quired under § 14.61, all species of live European rabbit of the genus wild game, birds may be imported, Oryctolagus; (4) any species of Indian transported, and possessed in captivity, wild dog, red dog, or dhole of the genus without a permit, for scientific, med- Cuon; (5) any species of multimammate ical, educational, exhibition, or propa- rat or mouse of the genus Mastomys; (6) gating purposes, and the eggs of such any raccoon dog, Nyctereutes birds may be imported, transported, procyonoides; and (7) any brushtail pos- and possessed, without a permit, for sum, Trichosurus vulpecula: Provided, propagating or scientific collection that the Director shall issue permits purposes, but no such live wild game authorizing the importation, transpor- birds or any progeny thereof may be re- leased into the wild except by the tation, and possession of such mam- State wildlife conservation agency mals under the terms and conditions having jurisdiction over the area of re- set forth in § 16.22. lease or by persons having prior writ- (b) Upon the filing of a written dec- ten permission for release from such laration with the District Director of agency. Customs at the port of entry as re- (c) Upon the filing of a written dec- quired under § 14.61, all other species of laration with the District Director of live wild mammals may be imported, Customs at the port of entry as re- transported, and possessed in captivity, quired under § 14.61, all species of live, without a permit, for scientific, med- wild nongame birds (other than those ical, educational, exhibition, or propa- listed in paragraph (a) of this section) gating purposes, but no such live wild may be imported, transported, and pos- mammals or any progeny thereof may sessed in captivity, without a permit, be released into the wild except by the for scientific, medical, educational, ex- State wildlife conservation agency hibition, or propagating purposes, but having jurisdiction over the area of re- no such live, wild nongame birds or any lease or by persons having prior writ- progeny thereof may be released into ten permission for release from such the wild except by or under the direc- agency: Provided, That the provisions tion of State wildlife conservation of this paragraph shall not apply to agencies when such agencies have re- live game mammals from Mexico, the ceived prior written permission from importation of which is governed by the Director for such release: Provided, 99 VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:47 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 238234 PO 00000 Frm 00109 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\238234.XXX 238234 jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with CFR § 16.13 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–16 Edition) That the provisions of this paragraph (C) Channa asiatica (Chinese or shall not apply to live bald and golden Northern Green snakehead). eagles or to live migratory birds, the (D) Channa aurantimaculata. importation of which is governed by (E) Channa bankanensis (Bangka regulations under parts 22 and 21 of snakehead). this chapter, respectively, or to birds (F) Channa baramensis (Baram of the Family Psittacidae (parrots, ma- snakehead). caws, cockatoos, parakeets, lories, (G) Channa barca (barca or tiger lovebirds, etc.), the importation and snakehead). transportation of which is governed by (H) Channa bleheri (rainbow or jewel U.S. Public Health Service regulations snakehead). under 42 CFR parts 71 and 72. (I) Channa cyanospilos (bluespotted (d) The importation of the eggs of snakehead). wild nongame birds is prohibited ex- (J) Channa gachua (dwarf, gaucha, or cept as permitted under § 16.33. frog snakehead). (K) Channa harcourtbutleri (Inle § 16.13 Importation of live or dead fish, snakehead). mollusks, and crustaceans, or their (L) Channa lucius (shiny or splendid eggs. snakehead). (a) Upon an exporter filing a written (M) Channa maculata (blotched declaration with the District Director snakehead). of Customs at the port of entry as re- (N) Channa marulius (bullseye, quired under § 14.61 of this chapter, live murrel, Indian, great, or cobra or dead fish, mollusks, and crusta- snakehead). ceans, or parts thereof, or their (O) Channa maruloides (emperor gametes or fertilized eggs, may be im- snakehead). ported, transported, and possessed in (P) Channa melanoptera. captivity without a permit except as (Q) Channa melasoma (black follows: snakehead). (1) No such live fish, mollusks, crus- (R) Channa micropeltes (giant, red, or tacean, or any progency or eggs thereof redline snakehead). may be released into the wild except by (S) Channa nox. the State wildlife conservation agency (T) Channa orientalis (Ceylon or Cey- having jurisdiction over the area of re- lonese Green snakehead). lease or by persons having prior writ- (U) Channa panaw. ten permission from such agency. (V) Channa pleurophthalmus (ocel- (2) The importation, transportation, lated, spotted, or eyespot snakehead). or acquisition of any of the species list- (W) Channa punctata (dotted or spot- ed in this paragraph is prohibited ex- ted snakehead). cept as provided under the terms and (X) Channa stewartii (golden conditions set forth in § 16.22: snakehead). (i) Live fish or viable eggs of walking (Y) Channa striata (chevron or striped catfish, family Clariidae. snakehead). (ii) Live mitten crabs, genus (Z) Parachanna africana (Niger or Af- Eriocheir, or their viable eggs. rican snakehead). (iii) Live mollusks, veligers, or viable (AA) Parachanna insignis (Congo, eggs of zebra mussels, genus Dreissena. square-spotted African or light African (iv) Any live fish or viable eggs of snakehead). snakehead fishes of the genera Channa (BB) Parachanna obscura (dark Afri- and Parachanna (or their generic syno- can, dusky, or square-spotted nyms of Bostrychoides, Ophicephalus, snakehead). Ophiocephalus, and Parophiocephalus) of (v) Any live fish, gametes, viable the Family Channidae, including but eggs, or hybrids of the following Asian not limited to: carp species in family Cyprinidae: (A) Channa amphibeus (Chel or Borna (A) Hypophthalmichthys harmandi snakehead). (largescale silver carp). (B) Channa argus (Northern or Amur (B) Hypophthalmichthys molitrix (sil- snakehead). ver carp). 100 VerDate Sep<11>2014 11:47 Dec 15, 2016 Jkt 238234 PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\238234.XXX 238234 jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with CFR.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Helogale Parvula)
    Vocal Recruitment in Dwarf Mongooses (Helogale parvula) Janneke Rubow Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Faculty of Science at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael I. Cherry Co-supervisor: Dr. Lynda L. Sharpe March 2017 Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za DECLARATION By submitting this thesis electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Janneke Rubow, March 2017 Copyright © 2017 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved Stellenbosch University https://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Vocal communication is important in social vertebrates, particularly those for whom dense vegetation obscures visual signals. Vocal signals often convey secondary information to facilitate rapid and appropriate responses. This function is vital in long-distance communication. The long-distance recruitment vocalisations of dwarf mongooses (Helogale parvula) provide an ideal opportunity to study informative cues in acoustic communication. This study examined the information conveyed by two recruitment calls given in snake encounter and isolation contexts, and whether dwarf mongooses are able to respond differently on the basis of these cues. Vocalisations were collected opportunistically from four wild groups of dwarf mongooses. The acoustic parameters of recruitment calls were then analysed for distinction between contexts within recruitment calls in general, distinction within isolation calls between groups, sexes and individuals, and the individuality of recruitment calls in comparison to dwarf mongoose contact calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Snakeheadsnepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN a Biologicalmyanmar Synopsis Vietnam
    Mongolia North Korea Afghan- China South Japan istan Korea Iran SnakeheadsNepal Pakistan − (Pisces,India Channidae) PACIFIC OCEAN A BiologicalMyanmar Synopsis Vietnam and Risk Assessment Philippines Thailand Malaysia INDIAN OCEAN Indonesia Indonesia U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 SNAKEHEADS (Pisces, Channidae)— A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment By Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1251 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GALE A. NORTON, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES G. GROAT, Director Use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. Copyrighted material reprinted with permission. 2004 For additional information write to: Walter R. Courtenay, Jr. Florida Integrated Science Center U.S. Geological Survey 7920 N.W. 71st Street Gainesville, Florida 32653 For additional copies please contact: U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, Colorado 80225-0286 Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams Snakeheads (Pisces, Channidae)—A Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment / by Walter R. Courtenay, Jr., and James D. Williams p. cm. — (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1251) Includes bibliographical references. ISBN.0-607-93720 (alk. paper) 1. Snakeheads — Pisces, Channidae— Invasive Species 2. Biological Synopsis and Risk Assessment. Title. II. Series. QL653.N8D64 2004 597.8’09768’89—dc22 CONTENTS Abstract . 1 Introduction . 2 Literature Review and Background Information . 4 Taxonomy and Synonymy .
    [Show full text]
  • Tion of Wildlife and Plants
    SUBCHAPTER B—TAKING, POSSESSION, TRANSPORTATION, SALE, PURCHASE, BARTER, EXPORTATION, AND IMPORTA- TION OF WILDLIFE AND PLANTS PART 10—GENERAL PROVISIONS § 10.2 Scope of regulations. The various parts of this subchapter Subpart A—Introduction B are interrelated, and particular note Sec. should be taken that the parts must be 10.1 Purpose of regulations. construed with reference to each other. 10.2 Scope of regulations. 10.3 Other applicable laws. § 10.3 Other applicable laws. 10.4 When regulations apply. No statute or regulation of any State Subpart B—Definitions shall be construed to relieve a person from the restrictions, conditions, and 10.11 Scope of definitions. 10.12 Definitions. requirements contained in this sub- 10.13 List of Migratory Birds. chapter B. In addition, nothing in this subchapter B, nor any permit issued Subpart C—Addresses under this subchapter B, shall be con- 10.21 Director. strued to relieve a person from any 10.22 Law enforcement offices. other requirements imposed by a stat- ute or regulation of any State or of the AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42; 16 U.S.C. 703–712; 16 U.S.C. 668a–d; 19 U.S.C. 1202, 16 U.S.C. 1531– United States, including any applicable 1543; 16 U.S.C. 1361–1384, 1401–1407; 16 U.S.C. health, quarantine, agricultural, or 742a–742j-l; 16 U.S.C. 3371–3378. customs laws or regulations, or other SOURCE: 38 FR 22015, Aug. 15, 1973, unless Service enforced statutes or regula- otherwise noted. tions. Subpart A—Introduction § 10.4 When regulations apply.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammalian Predators Appropriating the Refugia of Their Prey
    Mamm Res (2015) 60:285–292 DOI 10.1007/s13364-015-0236-y ORIGINAL PAPER When prey provide more than food: mammalian predators appropriating the refugia of their prey William J. Zielinski 1 Received: 30 September 2014 /Accepted: 20 July 2015 /Published online: 31 July 2015 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Białowieża, Poland (outside the USA) 2015 Abstract Some mammalian predators acquire both food and predators) may play disproportionately important roles in their shelter from their prey, by eating them and using the refugia communities. the prey construct. I searched the literature for examples of predators that exhibit this behavior and summarize their taxo- Keywords Predator–prey . Dens . Herbivore . Behavior . nomic affiliations, relative sizes, and distributions. I hypothe- Habitat . Resting . Foraging sized that size ratios of species involved in this dynamic would be near 1.0, and that most of these interactions would occur at intermediate and high latitudes. Seventeen species of Introduction Carnivorans exploited at least 23 species of herbivores as food and for their refugia. Most of them (76.4 %) were in the Mammals require food and most require shelter, either to pro- Mustelidae; several small species of canids and a few tect them from predators or from thermal stress. Carnivorous herpestids were exceptions. Surprisingly, the average mammals are unique in that they subsist on mobile food predator/prey weight ratio was 10.51, but few species of pred- sources which, particularly if these sources are vertebrates, ators were more than ten times the weight of the prey whose may build their own refuges to help regulate their body tem- refugia they exploit.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA)
    Challenges in Responsible Production of Aquatic Species Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA) Maria Rowena R. Romana-Eguia Fe D. Parado-Estepa Nerissa D. Salayo Ma. Junemie Hazel Lebata-Ramos Editors Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center AQUACULTURE DEPARTMENT Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines www.seafdec.org.ph Challenges in Responsible Production of Aquatic Species Proceedings of the International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA) August 2015 ISBN: 978-971-9931-04-1 Copyright © 2015 Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center Aquaculture Department Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines ALL RIGHTS RESERVED No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without the permission in writing from the publisher. For inquiries SEAFDEC Aquaculture Department Tigbauan 5021, Iloilo, Philippines Tel (63-33) 330 7030; Fax (63-33) 330 7031 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.seafdec.org.ph On the cover Logo design courtesy of Mr. Demy D. Catedral of SEAFDEC/AQD International Workshop on Resource Enhancement and Sustainable Aquaculture Practices in Southeast Asia (2014: Iloilo City, Philippines). Resource enhancement and sustainable aquaculture practices in Southeast Asia: challenges in responsible production of aquatic species : proceedings of the international workshop on resource enhancement and sustainable aquaculture practices in Southeast Asia 2014 (RESA) / Maria Rowena R. Romana-Eguia, Fe D. Parado-Estepa, Nerissa D. Salayo, Ma. Junemie Hazel L. Ramos, editors. -- Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines : Aquaculture Dept., Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 2015, ©2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Small Private Game Reserves in Leopard Panthera Pardus and Other Carnivore Conservation in South Africa
    The role of small private game reserves in leopard Panthera pardus and other carnivore conservation in South Africa Tara J. Pirie Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of The University of Reading for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences November 2016 Acknowledgements I would first like to thank my supervisors Professor Mark Fellowes and Dr Becky Thomas, without whom this thesis would not have been possible. I am sincerely grateful for their continued belief in the research and my ability and have appreciated all their guidance and support. I especially would like to thank Mark for accepting this project. I would like to acknowledge Will & Carol Fox, Alan, Lynsey & Ronnie Watson who invited me to join Ingwe Leopard Research and then aided and encouraged me to utilize the data for the PhD thesis. I would like to thank Andrew Harland for all his help and support for the research and bringing it to the attention of the University. I am very grateful to the directors of the Protecting African Wildlife Conservation Trust (PAWct) and On Track Safaris for their financial support and to the landowners and participants in the research for their acceptance of the research and assistance. I would also like to thank all the Ingwe Camera Club members; without their generosity this research would not have been possible to conduct and all the Ingwe Leopard Research volunteers and staff of Thaba Tholo Wilderness Reserve who helped to collect data and sort through countless images. To Becky Freeman, Joy Berry-Baker
    [Show full text]
  • Causes and Consequences of Coati Sociality
    chapter 28 Causes and consequences of coati sociality Ben T. Hirsch and Matthew E. Gompper Ring-tailed coatis (Nasua nasua) © B. Hirsch Introduction of Kaufmann’s work, and similar studies on pri- mates and other carnivores, have greatly enhanced Over fifty years ago John Kaufmann conducted a our understanding of how and why animals live in two-year study on the white-nosed coati (Nasua groups. Such issues frame the core of the modern narica) on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. The field of behavioural ecology. resulting monograph (Kaufmann 1962) is a solid Animals live in groups when the benefits (e.g. examination of the natural history of the species, a greater ability to survive threats from predators with an emphasis on understanding its social struc- and pathogens) are greater than the costs (e.g. in- ture. Although many such studies now exist, Kauf- creased competition for resources such as food or mann’s study bordered on revolutionary at the time mates) (Krause and Ruxton 2002). Overlaying such because this was one of the first studies to gather cost–benefit ratios are the genetic relatedness of in- detailed ethological data of wild vertebrates via dividuals and the willingness of animals to coop- habituation of free-living social animals. The idea erate in a manner that increases the benefits and of following animals from a distance of just a few decreases the costs of sociality. Among the mus- metres, and observing the nuances of their behav- teloid carnivores, studies of coatis have contrib- iour, was relatively novel at the time. The results uted more to our understanding of the causes and Hirsch, B.
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Non-Native Organism Risk Assessment Scheme
    EU NON-NATIVE SPECIES RISK ANALYSIS – RISK ASSESSMENT Channa spp. EU NON-NATIVE ORGANISM RISK ASSESSMENT SCHEME Name of organism: Channa spp. Author: Deputy Direction of Nature (Spanish Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries, Food and Environment) Risk Assessment Area: Europe Draft version: December 2016 Peer reviewed by: David Almeida. GRECO, Institute of Aquatic Ecology, University of Girona, 17003 Girona, Spain ([email protected]) Date of finalisation: 23/01/2017 Peer reviewed by: Quim Pou Rovira. Coordinador tècnic del LIFE Potamo Fauna. Plaça dels estudis, 2. 17820- Banyoles ([email protected]) Final version: 31/01/2017 1 EU NON-NATIVE SPECIES RISK ANALYSIS – RISK ASSESSMENT Channa spp. EU CHAPPEAU QUESTION RESPONSE 1. In how many EU member states has this species been recorded? List An adult specimen of Channa micropeltes was captured on 22 November 2012 at Le them. Caldane (Colle di Val d’Elsa, Siena, Tuscany, Italy) (43°23′26.67′′N, 11°08′04.23′′E).This record of Channa micropeltes, the first in Europe (Piazzini et al. 2014), and it constitutes another case of introduction of an alien species. Globally, exotic fish are a major threat to native ichthyofauna due to their negative impact on local species (Crivelli 1995, Elvira 2001, Smith and Darwall 2006, Gozlan et al. 2010, Hermoso and Clavero 2011). Channa argus in Slovakia (Courtenay and Williams, 2004, Elvira, 2001) Channa argus in Czech Republic (Courtenay and Williams 2004, Elvira, 2001) 2. In how many EU member states has this species currently None established populations? List them. 3. In how many EU member states has this species shown signs of None invasiveness? List them.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) § 16.14
    § 15.41 50 CFR Ch. I (10–1–20 Edition) Species Common name Serinus canaria ............................................................. Common Canary. 1 Note: Permits are still required for this species under part 17 of this chapter. (b) Non-captive-bred species. The list 16.14 Importation of live or dead amphib- in this paragraph includes species of ians or their eggs. non-captive-bred exotic birds and coun- 16.15 Importation of live reptiles or their tries for which importation into the eggs. United States is not prohibited by sec- Subpart C—Permits tion 15.11. The species are grouped tax- onomically by order, and may only be 16.22 Injurious wildlife permits. imported from the approved country, except as provided under a permit Subpart D—Additional Exemptions issued pursuant to subpart C of this 16.32 Importation by Federal agencies. part. 16.33 Importation of natural-history speci- [59 FR 62262, Dec. 2, 1994, as amended at 61 mens. FR 2093, Jan. 24, 1996; 82 FR 16540, Apr. 5, AUTHORITY: 18 U.S.C. 42. 2017] SOURCE: 39 FR 1169, Jan. 4, 1974, unless oth- erwise noted. Subpart E—Qualifying Facilities Breeding Exotic Birds in Captivity Subpart A—Introduction § 15.41 Criteria for including facilities as qualifying for imports. [Re- § 16.1 Purpose of regulations. served] The regulations contained in this part implement the Lacey Act (18 § 15.42 List of foreign qualifying breed- U.S.C. 42). ing facilities. [Reserved] § 16.2 Scope of regulations. Subpart F—List of Prohibited Spe- The provisions of this part are in ad- cies Not Listed in the Appen- dition to, and are not in lieu of, other dices to the Convention regulations of this subchapter B which may require a permit or prescribe addi- § 15.51 Criteria for including species tional restrictions or conditions for the and countries in the prohibited list.
    [Show full text]
  • Interspecific Killing Among Mammalian Carnivores
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Digital.CSIC vol. 153, no. 5 the american naturalist may 1999 Interspeci®c Killing among Mammalian Carnivores F. Palomares1,* and T. M. Caro2,² 1. Department of Applied Biology, EstacioÂn BioloÂgica de DonÄana, thought to act as keystone species in the top-down control CSIC, Avda. MarõÂa Luisa s/n, 41013 Sevilla, Spain; of terrestrial ecosystems (Terborgh and Winter 1980; Ter- 2. Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Conservation Biology and borgh 1992; McLaren and Peterson 1994). One factor af- Center for Population Biology, University of California, Davis, fecting carnivore populations is interspeci®c killing by California 95616 other carnivores (sometimes called intraguild predation; Submitted February 9, 1998; Accepted December 11, 1998 Polis et al. 1989), which has been hypothesized as having direct and indirect effects on population and community structure that may be more complex than the effects of either competition or predation alone (see, e.g., Latham 1952; Rosenzweig 1966; Mech 1970; Polis and Holt 1992; abstract: Interspeci®c killing among mammalian carnivores is Holt and Polis 1997). Currently, there is renewed interest common in nature and accounts for up to 68% of known mortalities in some species. Interactions may be symmetrical (both species kill in intraguild predation from a conservation standpoint each other) or asymmetrical (one species kills the other), and in since top predator removal is thought to release other some interactions adults of one species kill young but not adults of predator populations with consequences for lower trophic the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes During a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa
    diversity Article Mammal Species Richness at a Catena and Nearby Waterholes during a Drought, Kruger National Park, South Africa Beanélri B. Janecke Animal, Wildlife & Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, 205 Nelson Mandela Road, Park West, Bloemfontein 9301, South Africa; [email protected]; Tel.: +27-51-401-9030 Abstract: Catenas are undulating hillslopes on a granite geology characterised by different soil types that create an environmental gradient from crest to bottom. The main aim was to determine mammal species (>mongoose) present on one catenal slope and its waterholes and group them by feeding guild and body size. Species richness was highest at waterholes (21 species), followed by midslope (19) and sodic patch (16) on the catena. Small differences observed in species presence between zones and waterholes and between survey periods were not significant (p = 0.5267 and p = 0.9139). In total, 33 species were observed with camera traps: 18 herbivore species, 10 carnivores, two insectivores and three omnivores. Eight small mammal species, two dwarf antelopes, 11 medium, six large and six mega-sized mammals were observed. Some species might not have been recorded because of drought, seasonal movement or because they travelled outside the view of cameras. Mammal presence is determined by food availability and accessibility, space, competition, distance to water, habitat preferences, predators, body size, social behaviour, bound to territories, etc. The variety in body size and feeding guilds possibly indicates a functioning catenal ecosystem. This knowledge can be beneficial in monitoring and conservation of species in the park. Keywords: catena ecosystem; ephemeral mud wallows; habitat use; mammal variety; Skukuza area; Citation: Janecke, B.B.
    [Show full text]