DOCSLIB.ORG

Report on the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic 2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report on the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic 2003 Opening Message Dear Readers, You have in your hands the fifth Report on the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic, which was prepared by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic and summarises the Czech foreign policy in 2003. You can see how the Czech diplomacy put into practice the Concept of Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic for 2003 – 2006, which the government approved in March 2003, and how it conducted itself in the overall context of international affairs. On 17 April 2003 the Czech Republic signed the Treaty of Accession to the European Union. In the following referendum, the majority of citizens of the country supported EU accession. One of the priority tasks of Czech foreign policy since the 1989 revolution is thus nearing fruition. Our active participation in sessions of the Council of the European Union and in the preparation of the European Union’s Constitutional Treaty and our constructive work at sessions of the Intergovernmental Conference in 2003 have already demonstrated that we would be a worthy member of the EU. We have also been working on two other foreign policy priorities: strengthening Euro- Atlantic ties and furthering friendly relations with our neighbours; these relations are indeed very positive and friendly. The Czech Republic honoured its commitments stemming from NATO membership and put great effort into the war the international community is waging on international terrorism. On the multilateral forum, the Czech Republic successfully completed its presidency of the 57th General Assembly of the United Nations. This publication brings information on these and many other aspects of Czech foreign policy during 2003. Cyril Svoboda Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Czech Republic 1 INTRODUCTION 2003 was a highly specific year for the Czech Republic and its foreign service. The country was well aware of the increased responsibility it would have to shoulder as it took the final steps before joining the EU and as the fight against international terrorism intensified. These expectations soon became reality. The international campaign in Iraq and Afghanistan and other threats linked to the war on terror, as well as the final negotiations with European authorities and preparation of the referendum, presented a number of challenges to Czech foreign policy, challenges that required appropriate responses. The fact that the Czech Republic’s internal political scene was stable helped achieve the goals set. The government coalition continued in its work, albeit with the backing of a very small parliamentary majority. Václav Havel’s departure from the office of President of the Republic in February heralded a major change for Czech foreign policy. V. Havel played a crucial role in the establishment of a free and democratic Czechoslovakia and Czech Republic and in the country’s return to the fold of developed European democracies. V. Havel’s contribution to the Czech state and its foreign policy ranks him among the most important figures in Czech history. In March, Václav Klaus took up the office of President and the foreign policy tasks stemming from this function. Foreign policy activities in Czech Parliament were very extensive. Serious debates conducted in Parliament on a wide variety of foreign policy topics made clear its profound interest in the state’s foreign policy. The role of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs was to make the best possible use of all this foreign policy potential in order to present positively and assert the interests of the republic in accordance with the Euro-Atlantic alliance and European integration. The Czech Republic continued to stabilise its position on the international scene in 2003, chiefly in the process of European integration and Euro-Atlantic co-operation. The government concentrated on pursuing an active foreign policy designed to strengthen further the international standing of the Czech Republic. The main principles of Czech foreign policy continue to be asserting and defending the Czech Republic’s vital interests, with the emphasis on the broadest possible consensus among domestic political 2 factions. The Czech Republic’s foreign policy was based on the Government Policy Statement of August 2002 and the Concept of the Foreign Policy of the Czech Republic for 2003-2007, which was defined in March 2003. The main focus of attention was developing bilateral relations, as well as participation in multilateral activities as part of international organizations, conferences and other multilateral meetings. Another focus was the assertion of Czech national interests in other areas – economic, cultural and public interests, including relations at non- governmental level. Czech foreign policy ensured that measures and sanctions approved by the United Nations Security Council were implemented and that Czech law conformed to the law of the European Communities. The Czech Republic also played an active role in the war on international terrorism. In December 2003 the government amended the Security Strategy of the Czech Republic. Security strategy was updated in response to the changes in the international security environment and in line with the integration processes taking place in the Euro-Atlantic zone. The new strategy is fully compatible with the Security Strategy of the European Union, which was also adopted in December 2003. The signing of the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union was a historical moment in the European integration process, in Czech foreign policy and in the history of Czech statehood. The signing took place at an extraordinary session of the European Council in Athens on 16 April 2003. In a referendum held on 13 June 2003 and 14 June 2003, Czech citizens supported their country’s accession to the European Union on the terms negotiated in the Accession Treaty. 77.3% of the 55.2% of the population that took part in the referendum voted in favour of accession. The Accession Treaty was subsequently ratified by the President of the Republic on 30 September 2003. 2003 also saw the start of negotiations on enlargement of the European Economic Area (EEA), which culminated in the signing of the Agreement on the Participation of the Czech Republic in the European Economic Area in November 2003. The Czech Republic’s preparations for EU entry continued throughout 2003, touching on all areas of state administration. From April 2003 onwards, Czech representatives took part in the work of EU institutions at all levels as observers. In its monitoring report from the start of November 2003 the European Commission declared that the Czech Republic was ready to join and identified certain problem areas where it demanded that reforms be accelerated. 3 The fundamental debate on the future of the European Union continued with the active involvement of the Czech Republic. In the first half of the year the debate took place in the Convention and from October 2003 in the Intergovernmental Conference. The Convention, and the ensuing Intergovernmental Conference, became the first forums in the EU in which Czech representatives could take full part and present the Czech Republic’s vision of the future of European integration. The Convention formulated the Draft Treaty Establishing a European Constitution. The Intergovernmental Conference on the Future Arrangement of the EU debated the draft and other instruments designed to simplify the array of European treaties and make the arrangement of powers within the EU more transparent. Given the persisting differences in opinions on the institutional arrangement of the EU, the Intergovernmental Conference was not closed at the Brussels summit in December 2003; it was decided that it would continue in 2004. The successful culmination of the Czech Republic’s accession talks with the European Union and the signing of the Accession Treaty intensified parliamentary co-operation between the CR and the EU. The EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee continued its dialogue with deputies of the European Parliament; and once the Accession Treaty was signed, Czech deputies and senators started to operate as observers in the European Parliament. In 2003 the Czech Republic also took part in preparing the new financial outlook of the European Union, supported the European Pro-Growth Initiative and was actively involved in the process of reforming the Common Agricultural Policy of the EU. The Czech Republic also played a role in preparing a number of key EU positions and standpoints in the human rights working group of the Council of the European Union and in formulating principles of foreign development co-operation as one of the priorities of the EU’s external relations. The Czech Republic is gradually increasing its development aid and bringing its mechanisms and magnitude closer to the systems that operate in developed donor countries. EU countries continued to be the Czech Republic’s key trading partners in 2003. Czech exports to EU countries rose by 1.5% over 2002 levels, reaching CZK 957.6 billion (69.8% of total exports); imports from EU countries were worth CZK 854.2 billion (59.2% of total imports). This represented a continuation of the Czech Republic’s traditional balance of trade surplus, which amounted to CZK 103.3 billion in 2003. As in previous years, Germany remained the Czech Republic’s biggest trading partner: 37% of all Czech exports headed to and one-third of all Czech imports came from Germany. Austria, Italy and France continued to be the next most important partners of the Czech economy. 4 Accession to the European Union, the referendum and related campaign presented a fundamental challenge to the government’s communication strategy. In the first half of 2003, that strategy focused on the internal communication strategy, whose aim was to ensure that the referendum on the Czech Republic’s accession to the European Union was successful. The strategy sought to ensure that the entire Czech public was given relevant information through educational courses, projects and programmes, in the media, on the Internet and also through direct contact in dozens of regional and municipal information centres.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bus& 101 Introduction to Business Readings and Workbook Course Designer: Leslie Lum Academic Year 2010-2011 Funded by the Ga
    Bus& 101 Introduction to Business Readings and Workbook Course Designer: Leslie Lum Academic Year 2010-2011 Revised 5/11 Funded by the Gates Foundation/State Board Open Course Initiative 5/28/2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 Thirty Second Commercial 22 Resume 6 COMPANY ANALYSIS 24 DOING THE COMPANY ANALYSIS 25 Writing Self Assessment (Courtesy Robin Jeffers) 42 Company Selection 26 Company Research 29 Company Analysis- Marketing 37 Company Financial Analysis 38 Company Management Paper 39 Company Presentation 41 Links to sample student paper 42 Team Writing Assignment 47 Team Research Scavenger Assignment 49 MODULE 1: THE CONTEXT OF BUSINESS 51 Module 1 Goals 51 The Economy 52 GDP: One of the Great Inventions of the 20th Century 52 Economic Growth 55 World’s Economies 56 GDP per capita 66 Inflation 69 Business Cycles 74 Government and Policy 77 Fiscal Policy 77 Monetary Policy 79 Currency Risk 80 Economic Indicators 81 Individual Assignment – Calculating growth rates 85 Team Assignment - Economic Indicators 86 Team Assignment – Costco Case 91 Commanding Heights A Case Study of Bubbles 147 Module 1 Questions for Timed Writes 148 2 MODULE 2 - ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND LEGAL FORMS OF BUSINESS 149 Businesses and Entrepreneurship 150 Forms of Ownership 155 Choosing the Business Structure 158 Starting a Business – The Business Plan 159 Breakeven Analysis 167 Team Assignment – Forms of Business 171 Team Assignment – Entrepreneurship and Business Plan 173 Team Assignment Optional - Breakeven analysis of your business plan 174 Module 2 Questions
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering Sudetenland: on the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing Timothy W
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2006 Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing Timothy W. Waters Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Human Rights Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Waters, Timothy W., "Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing" (2006). Articles by Maurer Faculty. Paper 324. http://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/324 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Remembering Sudetenland: On the Legal Construction of Ethnic Cleansing TIMOTHY WILLIAM WATERS* I. To Begin: Something Uninteresting, and Something New ......... 64 II. A im s of the A rticle ................................................................. 66 1II. An Attempt at an Uncontroversial Historical Primer .............. 69 A. Czechoslovakia and Munich .......................................... 69 B. The Bene§ D ecrees ........................................................ 70 C. The Expulsions or Transfers .......................................... 73 D. The Potsdam Agreement ..............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Czech Debate on the EU Membership Perspectives of Turkey and Ukraine
    Czech debate on the EU membership perspectives of Turkey and Ukraine David Král EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy November 2005 Acknowledgement: This report was written as part of an international project, mapping the state of debate on the EU membership perspectives of Turkey and Ukraine in four Central European countries: Czech Republic, Poland, Hungary and Slovenia and undertaken jointly by EUROPEUM, Institute of Public Affairs (Warsaw), Centre for Policy Studies at CEU (Budapest) and Peace Institute (Ljubljana). Introduction The question of further EU enlargement is an issue that remained very much on the table even after the May 2004 “Big Bang” expansion of the Union. While in the ten countries that recently acceded all the efforts thus far have been focusing on the rules and conditions of entering the exclusive club, not much space in the public debate remained for discussing the issue as to what are the further steps in EU enlargement, which countries should be considered for joining and what are the stakes of the new member states, including the Czech Republic, in the whole process. This paper will look into examining the Czech attitudes towards the EU membership perspectives of two countries: Turkey and Ukraine. It will deal with the attitudes of the political representation, including the political parties, government and diplomatic service (Ministry of Foreign Affairs) and other governmental stakeholders. Further, it will try to give an account of how the issue was treated in the media, especially in the major opinion shaping newspapers. Thirdly, it will try to assess what are the other stakeholders in the process, especially within the ranks of the civil society and how they are likely to shape the public debate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Václav Havel Library Annual Report 2017 2 Lidé Knihovny Václava Havla
    The Václav Havel Library Annual Report 2017 2 Lidé Knihovny Václava Havla Published in 2018 by the charity the Václav Havel Library registered at the Municipal Court in Prague, file O 338 dated 26 July 2004 statutory representative: Michael Žantovský address: Ostrovní 13, 110 00 Prague 1 Identification no. 27169413 / Tax identification no. CZ 27169413 Bank accounts: 7077 7077 / 0300 CZK; IBAN: CZ61 0300 0000 0000 7077 7077 7755 7755 / 0300 EUR; IBAN: CZ40 0300 0000 0000 7755 7755 7747 7747 / 0300 USD; IBAN: CZ66 0300 0000 0000 7747 7747 SWIFT CODE: CEKO CZPP Tel.: (+420) 222 220 112 Email: [email protected] The Václav Havel Library is registered according to the libraries law under registration no. 6343/2007 at the Ministry of Culture of the Czech Republic www.vaclavhavel-library.org www.facebook.com/KnihovnaVaclavaHavla www.facebook.com/VaclavHavelLibrary www.youtube.com/knihovnaVaclavahavla www.twitter.com/KnihovnaVH www.twitter.com/HavelLibraries www.instagram.com/knihovnaVaclavahavla Lidé Knihovny Václava Havla 3 It only makes sense as a living or vital organism that occupies a place that cannot be overlooked in overall public and political life. […] The Library must in some way be original as such, in itself, in its everyday nature, as a permanently existing phenomenon or place. Václav Havel A Few Sentences on the Václav Havel Library Hrádeček 4 Contents Contents on the preparation of film documents THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY and retrospectives PEOPLE OF THE VÁCLAV HAVEL LIBRARY PUBLISHING ACTIVITIES Founders Best-selling
    [Show full text]
  • Miroslav Kalousek a 20 Let Jeho Úrednických a Politických
    Miroslav Kalousek a 20 let jeho ´uˇrednick´ych a politick´ych her Struˇcn´averze pro nen´aroˇcn´ehoˇcten´aˇre Nadaˇcn´ıfond proti korupci Obsah Prolog 2 Pˇredmluva 3 Uvod´ 4 1 Zlat´a90. l´eta 7 1.1 Jak to bylo s pad´aky? . 8 1.2 Modernizace tanku T-72 . 11 1.3 St´abn´ıinformaˇcn´ısyst´em.ˇ . 13 1.4 Prodej deseti letoun˚uMiG-29 . 16 1.5 Prodej stovky tank˚uˇradyT-72 do Alˇz´ırska . 20 1.6 Prodej kas´arenna n´amˇest´ıRepubliky . 22 1.7 Shrnut´ı:Kalousk˚uvsyst´emrozd´av´an´ıveˇrejn´ych zak´azek. 25 2 Pˇresahdo nov´ehotis´ıcilet´ıa jeho pˇrelom 30 2.1 Kauza Diag Human . 30 2.2 Ochrana vzduˇsn´ehoprostoru ˇcilikauza Gripeny . 35 3 Na sam´emvrcholu 40 3.1 Kauza M´ytn´ea kauza Elektronick´evinˇety . 40 3.2 Kauza Hazard . 44 3.3 Znovu arm´ada{ kauza Letadla CASA . 50 3.4 Starost o pˇr´ırodu ˇciliekologick´asuperzak´azka . 56 3.5 Starost o c´ırkev ˇcilic´ırkevn´ınarovn´an´ı . 59 4 Humorn´eodlehˇcen´ına z´avˇer 63 4.1 Plukovn´ık N´ahl´ık\ odch´az´ı! . 63 " 4.2 Miroslav Kalousek a humor . 64 Pˇr´ıloha{ Richard H´ava & Miroslav Kalousek 65 Literatura 69 1 Prolog Kir je mal´epostavy, zat´ımjen m´ırnˇeproˇsedivˇel´y.Ve tv´aˇrinem´anic pozoruhodn´eho. " Kdybys ho potkal na ulici, ani se za n´ım neotoˇc´ıˇs,ani dech se ti nezataj´ı, srdce se ti nerozbuˇs´ı.Oblek m´ataky ten nejobyˇcejnˇejˇs´ı{ ˇsediv´ys prouˇzkem.Uˇsit´yje ovˇsems vkusem.
    [Show full text]
  • Populism in Central Europe
    Organiser: Objectives of this book are: The Association for International Affairs (AMO) is a Czech non-govern- ■ To examine the factors that feed the contemporary populist facet of Central European politics. mental organization that conducts research, and hosts educational pro- ■ To critically analyze the concept of populism: Is populism an inherent feature of politics? grams in the fields of international affairs, foreign policy and security ■ To discuss the historical and ideological roots of Central European populism: What has influenced studies. AMO, established in 1995, the formation of populism in Central Europe? is currently one of the leading institu- With kind support of: tions of its kind in the Czech ■ To ask whether the features shared by the Central European states outweigh their differences and Republic. whether there is such phenomenon as "Central European populism". The Research Center of AMO pro- Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz (editors) vides independent expert analyses, supports discussions at various levels and provides solutions for these issues. EMBASSY OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND IN PRAGUE MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC POPULISM IN CENTRAL EUROPE Populism in Central Europe Editors: Václav Nekvapil and Maria Staszkiewicz Compiled by: Vendula Peisertová, Jiří Bednář, Lauren Trigero, Adéla Jurečková, Jitka Jurková, Lenka Ryjáčková and Vlaďka Votavová Translations: Gwendolyn Albert (Eva van de Rakt: Opening Remarks; Marie Gailová: Populism in the Context of "the Roma Question"; Jiří Musil: Reflections on Czech Populism; Václav Nekvapil: Populism and the Role of Political Parties in the Czech Republic and Lukáš Benda: Populism in Contemporary Hungarian Politics) Designed by: Tomáš Barčík – design studio Printed by: BCS, s.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract the Elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic on 28Th and 29Th May 2010 Was Called Facebook Elections
    Abstract The elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic on 28th and 29th May 2010 was called Facebook elections. The reason for such title was the scale of usage of Facebook by the political parties for their campaigns. The thesis Facebook and the elections. The analysis of a self-presentation of the Czech political parties before the elections to the Chamber of Deputies of the Parliament of the Czech Republic in 2010 focuses on a semiotic analysis of Facebook accounts of some political parties and their chairmen. During the monitored period Facebook presentations were presented by the Civic Democratic Party, the Czech Social Democratic Party, TOP 09, the Public Affairs party, Christian Democratic Union – Czechoslovak People’s Party and the Greens. The Communist Party of Bohemia and Moravia was not officially registered on Facebook. We also analyzed Facebook pages of Mirek Topolanek (ODS), Petr Necas (ODS), Jiri Paroubek (CSSD), Karel Schwarzenberg (TOP 09), Radek John (VV), Cyril Svoboda (KDU-CSL) and Ondrej Liska (SZ). We call Facebook a viral social network. We analyzed it as a cyberspace with an ambivalent structure which influences the mean of a communication process before elections. Rhizomatic map of Facebook is comparable with a topology of a virtual cafe. We also present a comparison to an egocentric structure of a monitored socioware. With the help of a theory of a political marketing we also show on what principals does the facebook campaign work and how does it differ from means of propaganda of political parties in previous years. We are trying to understand when the self-presentation and reveal of the background is effective and when it, on the contrary, leads to a demystification of a political authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Central European Update
    CSIS New European Democracies Project Volume 4 ▌Number 27 ▌July 13, 2007 Central European Update Poland be discussed next month, accord- reported that Hungary is deter- Slovenia On 10 July Polish President Lech ing to Czech Finance Minister mined to complete the require- On 12 July Slovenia’s Public Kaczynski met his visiting Czech Miroslav Kalousek. ments for joining the euro by Agency for Railway Transporta- counterpart Vaclav Klaus. The two 2009. tion and SCT, a local construc- officials stated that they share Former Czech Foreign Minister tion company, signed a contract views on the future of the EU con- Cyril Svoboda revealed that the On 6 July, a delegation from for a EUR 12 million project stitutional treaty and the voting Czech government of former NATO’s Defense Review Com- aimed at improving the country’s weights in the Council of the Euro- Prime Minister Jiri Paroubek mittee urged Hungary to increase railway infrastructure. The project pean Union. They also discussed first discussed the missile defense defense spending and restructure is part of a larger initiative, which trade and economic collaboration radar proposal with the U.S. at a the armed forces. Hungary’s De- is sponsored by the EU and the and missile defense. The Czech NATO summit in Prague in 2002. fense Minister Imre Szekeres Slovenian government and is President also met with Prime Min- Technical negotiations were con- insisted that the defense budget scheduled to be completed by the ister Jaroslaw Kaczynski to dis- ducted only with the defense min- will remain at 1.2 percent of GDP end of 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • The Network Analysis of Co ‑Voting Strategies of the KDU ‑ČSL Deputies 1
    The disintegration of KDU ‑ČSL in 2009: The network analysis of co ‑voting strategies of the KDU ‑ČSL deputies 1 DUŠAN BRABEC Politics in Central Europe (ISSN: 1801-3422) Vol. 16, No. 2 DOI: 10.2478/pce-2020-0023 Abstract: The main objective of this study is to capture and analyse the dynamics of co ‑voting ties among the members of the KDU ‑ČSL political party group in the 5th parliamentary term between 2006 and 2010 when some members of KDU ‑ČSL left this party and founded new political party TOP 09. For the analysis of the data, network approach and methods were used, with emphasis on the detection of possible rivalling communities in the constructed network of co‑voting ties between deputies belonging to the KDU‑ČSL parliamentary party group in the analysed time period. The co‑voting was treated as a proxy indicator of a possible relationship indicating co ‑operation or rivalry between the deputies. The main outcome of the study was the identification of the co ‑voting strategies and dynamics of the co ‑voting between deputies who left KDU ‑ČSL in 2009 and formed a new political party with their former party colleagues. The study is of a quantitative nature, but the main findings are connected to qualita‑ tive insights as well. Keywords: political parties; unity, party discipline, party factionalism, co‑voting, legislative networks 1 This study was supported by the Charles University Research Programme ‘Progres’ Q18 – Social Sciences: From Multidisciplinarity to Interdisciplinarity. The author would like to thank Lukáš Hájek for the initial data preparation. POLITICS IN CENTRAL EUROPE 16 (2020) 2 547 Introduction It has been more than ten years since the new political party TOP 09 was estab‑ lished in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Dohoda Ústavních Činitelů, Parlamentních Politických Stran a Občanů O Společném Postupu Proti Nárůstu Extremismu a Rasismu
    Dohoda ústavních činitelů, parlamentních politických stran a občanů o společném postupu proti nárůstu extremismu a rasismu y ústavní činitelé a předsedové parlamentních politických stran v duchu nedotknutelných hodnot M lidské důstojnosti a v souladu s našim slibem hájit ústavní pořádek ČR založený na úctě k lidským právům a zásadám občanské společnosti spojujeme svůj hlas a touto dohodou: – jednoznačně odsuzujeme šíření extremistických nálad a vyvolávání atmosféry konfrontace a násilí v naší společnosti – jasně odmítáme jakékoliv projevy rasové diskriminace a pokusy o vymáhání rasové nadřazenosti a etnické či sociální segregace – nepřipustíme, aby tyto názory a myšlenky pronikly do veřejného diskursu a politické reality předvo- lebního boje – vyzýváme veřejnou správu, aby efektivně využívala všech dostupných právních nástrojů k překonání těchto názorů a nálad – budeme při výkonu svých funkcí podporovat veškeré aktivity vedoucí k omezení nárůstu pravicového a levicového extremismu a vždy budeme vystupovat proti všem projevům rasové diskriminace ve společnosti. Předseda Poslanecké sněmovny ČR Předseda Senátu ČR Předseda Vlády ČR Členové Vlády ČR MZV MO MF MEZ MV MPO MSP MPSV MD MZE MZD MŠMT MŽP MK MMR Předsedové parlamentních politických stran ODS KDU-ČSL SZ ČSSD KSČM Veřejný ochránce práv 1. Prezident ČR navrhovatel: ministr Michael Kocáb Senátoři Milan Štěch Jaromír Chalupa Ondřej Plašil Miroslav Antl Jaromír Štětina Radim Chytka Petr Pleva Vlastimil Balín Tomáš Töpfer Kateřina Jacques Pavel Ploc Ivo Bárek Pavel Trpák Věra Jakubková Jiří Polanský Marta Bayerová Alena Venhodová Vítězslav Jandák Jiří Pospíšil Jiří Bis Otakar Veřovský Jiří Janeček Zdeněk Prosek Milan Bureš Petr Vícha Miroslav Jeník Přemysl Rabas Pavel Čáslava Václav Vlček Josef Ježek Petr Rafaj Jiří Dienstbier Alexandr Vondra Libor Ježek Juraj Raninec Hana Doupovcová Dagmar Zvěřinová Zdeněk Jičínský, DrSc.
    [Show full text]
  • Analýza Vývoje KDU-ČSL Na České Politické Scéně
    PRÁVNICKÁ FAKULTA MASARYKOVY UNIVERZITY Obor Právo a finance Katedra ústavního práva a politologie BAKALÁŘSKÁ PRÁCE Analýza vývoje KDU-ČSL na české politické scéně Tomáš Nečas, DiS. 2011 „Prohlašuji, ţe jsem bakalářskou práci na téma: Analýza politického vývoje KDU-ČSL na české politické scéně zpracoval sám. Veškeré prameny a zdroje informací, které jsem pouţil k sepsání této práce, byly citovány v poznámkách pod čarou a jsou uvedeny v seznamu pouţitých pramenů a literatury“. V Brně dne 3. dubna 2011 ------------------------------------- Poděkování: Děkuji vedoucímu práce doc. JUDr. Jiřímu Kroupovi CSc. za velmi uţitečnou metodickou pomoc, odborné vedení, cenné rady a připomínky, které mi poskytl při zpracování této práce. Obsah Úvod .................................................................................................................................. 7 1 Historie Československé strany lidové v letech 1918 -1989 .................................... 8 1.1 ČSL v letech 1918 – 1938 .................................................................................. 8 1.1.1 Vznik Československé strany lidové .......................................................... 8 1.1.2 Program ....................................................................................................... 8 1.1.3 Účast ve vládách ....................................................................................... 10 1.1.4 Volební výsledky ...................................................................................... 12 1.1.5 Zhodnocení období
    [Show full text]
  • Tříleté Působení Koaliční Vlády Mirka Topolánka Ohodnotila Polovina Občanů Známkami 4 Nebo 5
    INFORMACE Z VÝZKUMU STEM TRENDY 5/2009 TŘÍLETÉ PŮSOBENÍ KOALIČNÍ VLÁDY MIRKA TOPOLÁNKA OHODNOTILA POLOVINA OBČANŮ ZNÁMKAMI 4 NEBO 5. Známkou 1 a 2 ohodnotilo práci bývalé vlády 22 % obyvatel ČR. Mezi nejlépe hodnocené ministry této vlády patří Karel Schwarzenberg (45 % lidí mu udělilo známky 1 a 2), Jiří Pospíšil (41 %) a Miroslav Kalousek (41 %). Naopak nejhůře hodnocenými členy Topolánkovy vlády jsou Ivan Langer (52 % lidí mu udělilo známky 4 a 5), Martin Bursík (52 %) a sám Mirek Topolánek (53 %). Největší pokles příznivého hodnocení během tříletého období vlády Mirka Topolánka zaznamenal Martin Bursík, nárůst potom Miroslav Kalousek a Karel Schwarzenberg. Citované výsledky pocházejí z výzkumu STEM provedeného na reprezentativním souboru obyvatel České republiky starších 18 let, který se uskutečnil ve dnech 5. – 12. 5. 2009. Respondenti byli vybíráni metodou kvótního výběru. Na otázky odpovídal rozsáhlý soubor 1265 respondentů. Po vyslovení nedůvěry vládě Mirka Topolánka a v době kolem jmenování vlády Jana Fischera se společnost STEM zeptala občanů, jakou známkou by ohodnotili celé období koaliční vlády pod vedením Mirka Topolánka, tj. od ledna roku 2007 do května 2009. Polovina Čechů by tuto vládu ocenila známkou dostatečnou až nedostatečnou. Jako dobrou by jejich práci ohodnotila necelá třetina lidí (29 %). Známkou chvalitebnou až výbornou by období jejich vlády označilo 22 % dotázaných. "Jakou celkovou školní známku byste Vy osobně dal(a) koaliční vládě pod vedením Mirka Topolánka za celé období, tj. od ledna roku 2007?" 3 19 29 35 15 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 1 2 3 4 5 Pramen: STEM, Trendy 5/2009, 1265 respondentů starších 18 let Výbornou a chvalitebnou známkou hodnotili koaliční vládu Mirka Topolánka častěji lidé dobře ekonomicky zajištění (46 % z nich), podnikatelé (43 %), živnostníci (30 %) a vysokoškolsky vzdělaní voliči (30 %).
    [Show full text]