DOCSLIB.ORG

Introduction to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, Supporting Fish & Fishermen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Introduction to the Magnuson-Stevens Act, Supporting Fish & Fishermen Supporting Fish & Fishermen An Introduction to the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act This booklet provides an introduction to fishery management in U.S. federal ocean waters, where fishing is primarily managed through the Magnuson- Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, also known as the Magnuson-Stevens Act or MSA. Common fishery management terms are referenced in bolded blue throughout the text and are defined in the glossary at the end of the booklet. Who is Ocean Conservancy? Ocean Conservancy is working to protect the ocean from today’s greatest global challenges. Together with our partners, we create science-based solutions for a healthy ocean and the wildlife and communities that depend on it. Our Fish Conservation Program has spent decades working with fishermen and lifting up the voices of the communities that depend on our ocean. We work to find practical solutions to today’s fishery management challenges to ensure sustainable fishing and healthy coastal communities far into the future. Contents Fishing Is an American Tradition and an Important Economic Driver 1 The Basics of U.S. Fishery Management 3 Forty Years of Bipartisan Cooperation Managing Our Fisheries 5 The Five “Ws” of Fishery Management 7 Science-Based Limits for Long-term Sustainability 9 Bringing Fish Stocks Back from the Brink 11 The Magnuson-Stevens Act Is Guided by 10 National Standards 13 What the Magnuson-Stevens Act Does and Does Not Do 14 Conservation and Economic Benefits Go Hand in Hand 15 Cover photo credit: Jeffrey Wickett Jeffrey credit: photo Cover U.S. Fisheries Are More Sustainable Than Ever Under the Magnuson-Stevens Act 17 Glossary 19 References 20 Fishing Is an American Tradition... ...and an Important Economic Driver History is often told as the story of a land, but arguably whole chapters of our Fisheries form an nation’s history are stories of water. Our vast oceans, teeming with fish like important part cod, herring, mackerel and salmon, have supported the families, businesses, communities and traditions of people living here since time immemorial. Fishing of our economy. is an important part of American culture — from commercial fishermen who Commercial spend weeks at sea to bring in a fresh catch, to American Indian and Alaska and recreational Native Tribes with thousands of years of fishing traditions, to recreational fisherman that may spend just a few days each year trying to catch the fishing generated big one. And for many Americans, having fish for dinner is one of their few over $212 billion remaining connections to the wild-caught natural resources of our nation. in sales impacts Not long ago, our fisheries were in real trouble. Historic overfishing led and supported 1.7 to failing fishing ports and businesses. Fishermen, working with fishery million jobs in 2016. managers and scientists, sacrificed and worked hard to bring our fisheries back. Today, the United States has one of the strongest fishery management systems in the world. While there is still work to be done, overfishing is now at near-historic lows. A “fishery” can In order to enjoy all the benefits of healthy fisheries, we manage with strong, mean lots of things: science-based conservation measures that meet social, economic, and environmental objectives. This ensures we have fish now and in the future. the fish that are Without management, overfishing can put entire fisheries at risk of collapse. caught, the act of And when that happens, we all lose. fishing, and the people who fish. Photo credit: Tom McCann Tom credit: Photo OCEAN CONSERVANCY | 1 TYPES OF FISHING Photo credit: Megan O’Neill credit: Photo Commercial Operations vary in size, but these fishermen fish with the intent of selling their catch as a livelihood. Photo credit: Rachel Guillory credit: Photo Recreational — For-hire Captains and crew make a living by taking people out fishing. Large headboats charge per individual, while charter captains reserve their boat for a small private group. Photo credit: Benjamin Drummond credit: Photo Recreational — Private Anglers These fishermen catch fish primarily for entertainment and cannot sell their catch. Subsistence Photo credit: Andrew Hartsig Andrew credit: Photo This type of fishing refers to a way of life that includes fishing, hunting, gathering and related activities which are connected to both food security and culture. Most subsistence fishing is not directly managed under the Magnuson-Stevens Act, but many aspects of federal fishery management have impacts on subsistence species and users. SUPPORTING FISH & FISHERMEN | 2 Photo credit: Doug Kerr credit: Photo The Basics of U.S. Fishery Management Conserving our fish and eating them too THE VISION Healthy fish populations and resilient ocean ecosystems that support thriving fishing businesses, provide ample fishing opportunities, and deliver nutritious protein to the dinner plates of families throughout America and around the world. HOW WE GET THERE “Fishery resources are The Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act. finite but renewable. First signed in 1976 and reauthorized twice, the Magnuson-Stevens Act is If placed under sound the landmark law that guides the long-term sustainable use of our ocean management before fish resources. The law is guided by three key objectives: overfishing has 1. It supports fishing businesses and fishing opportunities (see page 15) caused irreversible 2. It paves the way to ending overfishing in our waters using annual catch effects, the fisheries limits (see page 9) can be conserved 3. It oversees the rebuilding of U.S. fisheries that are in poor health and maintained.” (see page 11) The Magnuson-Stevens Act The Magnuson-Stevens Act works by establishing science-based management principles that are guided by the 10 National Standards (see page 13). Regional stakeholders develop plans based on these principles that are designed to meet regional needs, and NOAA Fisheries implements these plans to meet conservation and management goals. OCEAN CONSERVANCY | 3 SUSTAINABLE, SCIENCE-BASED MANAGEMENT IS DESIGNED TO PREVENT: Overfishing of a fish stock. Overfishing occurs when a stock is caught at a rate that is too high to be sustainable. Overfishing is associated with many negative outcomes, including an overfished stock. An overfished stock. Overfished refers to the size of a stock. An overfished stock has a size that is too low and jeopardizes its ability to ensure sustainable yields in the future. To put it in banking terms, overfishing is like taking more out of an account than is going in. Eventually, the fish stock will become overfished, similar to bankruptcy. I was impressed from the start at how [the Magnuson-Stevens Act] emerged from a bipartisan partnership 40 years ago: Senators Magnuson and Stevens working together. It confirmed for me that people are meant to Photo credit: Erv DeSmet credit: Photo work together.” Erv DeSmet, Angler Woodinville, WA NOAA Fisheries The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is the federal agency charged with managing fisheries in federal ocean waters. Ultimately, the secretary of commerce has the authority and responsibility to manage fisheries under the Magnuson-Stevens Act. The arm of NOAA that actually carries out management is NOAA Fisheries, which is also called the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). NOAA Fisheries carries out science to support management, writes and implements regulations, and works in other areas that affect fish, such as habitat restoration. It coordinates with the regional fishery management councils and other regional and international management bodies. SUPPORTING FISH & FISHERMEN | 4 Forty Years of Bipartisan Cooperation Managing Our Fisheries TIME BEFORE 1950s –1970s IMMEMORIAL 1950s After World War II, commercial fishing American Indian Ocean resources boomed due to new technology and and Alaska Native were generally larger vessels. Fishermen could travel tribes harvested fish treated as farther offshore, where there were few and other marine inexhaustible. federal regulations to manage catch. resources utilizing There were few At the same time, large foreign vessels traditional harvest limits on fishing. capable of catching vast quantities and management of fish moved closer to U.S. shores. methods. As domestic catch began to dwindle, concerns grew over the impact of fishing on fish stocks. 1950 1960 1970 Major milestones of the 1976 Magnuson-Stevens Act To prevent foreign fishing fleets from taking fish near American shores, Congress passed the bipartisan Fishery Conservation & Management Act. Spearheaded by Senators Ted Stevens (R-AK) and Warren Magnuson (D-WA), the Act: • Balanced conservation and fishery development • Established a 200-mile zone to protect domestic fisheries • Called for sustainable management to prevent overfishing Photo credit: Stevens Foundation Stevens credit: Photo OCEAN CONSERVANCY | 5 1980s –1990s 1996–2006 2007–PRESENT As domestic fisheries developed, Despite Requiring science-based intensive fishing caused many fish improvements in management and annual catch stocks to continue to decline. the law, fish stocks limits was a breakthrough that made only modest led to the rebuilding of dozens gains, in part of stocks. Many fisheries are because managers healthier now than they have Photo credit: Rick Friedman credit: Photo could ignore been in decades. scientific advice and there was little accountability for excessive fishing. 1980 1990 2000 2010 1980 1996 2006 The Fishery Recognizing
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Richard Russell, the Senate Armed Services Committee & Oversight of America’S Defense, 1955-1968
    BALANCING CONSENSUS, CONSENT, AND COMPETENCE: RICHARD RUSSELL, THE SENATE ARMED SERVICES COMMITTEE & OVERSIGHT OF AMERICA’S DEFENSE, 1955-1968 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Joshua E. Klimas, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor David Stebenne, Advisor Professor John Guilmartin Advisor Professor James Bartholomew History Graduate Program ABSTRACT This study examines Congress’s role in defense policy-making between 1955 and 1968, with particular focus on the Senate Armed Services Committee (SASC), its most prominent and influential members, and the evolving defense authorization process. The consensus view holds that, between World War II and the drawdown of the Vietnam War, the defense oversight committees showed acute deference to Defense Department legislative and budget requests. At the same time, they enforced closed oversight procedures that effectively blocked less “pro-defense” members from influencing the policy-making process. Although true at an aggregate level, this understanding is incomplete. It ignores the significant evolution to Armed Services Committee oversight practices that began in the latter half of 1950s, and it fails to adequately explore the motivations of the few members who decisively shaped the process. SASC chairman Richard Russell (D-GA) dominated Senate deliberations on defense policy. Relying only on input from a few key colleagues – particularly his protégé and eventual successor, John Stennis (D-MS) – Russell for the better part of two decades decided almost in isolation how the Senate would act to oversee the nation’s defense.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Mail Logs for the President (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R
    The original documents are located in Box 8, folder “Congress - Congressional Mail Logs for the President (1)” of the John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald R. Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. r Digitized from Box 8 of The John Marsh Files at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library Presi dent's Mail - May 11, 1976 House 1. Augustus Hawkins Writes irr regard to his continuing · terest in meeting with the President to discuss the· tuation at the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission prior to the appoint­ ment of a successor to Chairman owell W. Perry. 2. Larry Pressler Says he will vote to sustain e veto of the foreign military assistance se he believes the $3.2 billion should be u ed for nior citizens here at horne. 3. Gus Yatron Writes on behalf of Mrs. adys S. Margolis concerning the plight of Mr. Mi ail ozanevich and his family in the Soviet Union. 4. Guy Vander Jagt Endorses request of the TARs to meet with the President during their convention in June.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Informational Report 5 June 2021
    Supplemental Informational Report 5 June 2021 PACIFIC FISHERY MANAGEMENT COUNCIL SPONSORS A SUCCESSFUL SABLEFISH MANAGEMENT STRATEGY EVALUATION WORKSHOP The Pacific Fishery Management Council, in collaboration with the National Marine Fisheries Service Alaska and Northwest Fisheries Science Centers, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, the University of Washington, and the North Pacific Fishery Management Council, convened a workshop to solicit stakeholders’ recommendations on the focus of a management strategy evaluation (MSE) for Northeast Pacific Sablefish. The Sablefish MSE Workshop occurred on April 27 and 28 via webinar. There were 59 attendees to the workshop and the workshop report is available at pacificsablefishscience.org and is also appended to this notice. Presentations from agency and academic researchers serving on the Pacific Sablefish Transboundary Assessment Team (PSTAT) briefed attendees on the development of an operating model to better understand the dynamics of sablefish across its range. Participants in the workshop were educated on MSE approaches and provided their recommendations on management objectives, performance metrics, and management strategies for achieving desired outcomes. The PSTAT will consider this stakeholder advice as the MSE is refined. Participants opined the workshop was useful and encouraged further stakeholder engagement in future workshops. 1 Transboundary Sablefish Management Strategy Evaluation (MSE) Workshop Report Report compiled by Maia
    [Show full text]
  • FY19 NOAA Funding Topline Letter Download
    Dear Senators and Representatives, With the release of "An American Budget" on February 12, 2018, the Trump Administration again proposed eliminating or slashing vital National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) grants and programs. The Fiscal Year 2019 (FY19) budget proposal would slash over $1 billion from NOAA, harming our nation's ocean and coastal economy and environment. The undersigned include groups and individuals that support NOAA’s ocean, coastal, and fisheries programs. We write to express our extreme dismay at the FY19 NOAA budget proposal and to ask that you ensure that no such budget becomes a reality for our nation’s premier ocean agency. We urge you to maintain funding for NOAA at or above current levels. At the same time, you and your colleagues in Congress are working to finalize the FY18 budget for NOAA. We applaud your work in appropriating $400 million in funding to NOAA for hurricane recovery efforts in the wake of the 2017 hurricane season. While you recognized the important role NOAA plays for coastal communities in disaster funding, we hope you will continue to recognize the role NOAA plays year-round, across the country, for communities and economies that depend on our oceans and coasts. We urge you to ensure that the final FY18 budget for NOAA maintains at least current funding levels, and makes additional investments in our oceans and coastal communities where possible. NOAA’s mission, to understand, protect, restore, and manage our ocean, coasts, and Great Lakes, is vitally important to sustain these resources and our economy. The U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Smart” Marine Protected Areas for Mitigation and Adaptation Policy
    June 2020 Ocean and Climate Discussion Series “Climate-Smart” Marine Protected Areas for Mitigation and Adaptation Policy This brief reviews the potential climate benefits of marine what factors should be considered in their design? protected areas (MPAs), discusses how policymakers and practitioners can help ensure that MPAs are “climate smart,” To address these questions, this brief reviews the climate and underscores that, because a suite of mitigation and benefits that MPAs can have and discusses emerging principles adaptation policies is necessary to address the climate to guide how policymakers and practitioners can make MPAs challenge, climate-smart MPAs merit a place in the climate climate-smart. It is important to acknowledge, of course, that a policy toolbox. It is part of Ocean Conservancy’s “Ocean and wide range of ambitious climate strategies across sectors, from Climate Discussion Series,” which provides science-based electricity and transportation to agriculture and buildings, is analysis to inform the global dialogue on integrating ocean necessary to address the climate crisis. Yet, as this brief issues into climate policy. underscores, climate-smart MPAs merit a place in the climate policy toolbox. Introduction MPAs, Other Area-Based Measures, and Until recently, the global fight against climate change has largely overlooked the ocean-climate nexus. There is now a Integrated Ocean Management growing movement to correct this. Ocean and climate champions—including nations, non-federal governments, and An MPA is defined as “a clearly defined geographical nongovernmental organizations—are creating ocean-climate space, recognized, dedicated and managed, through legal leadership coalitions, working to elevate ocean issues in or other effective means, to achieve the long-term international climate negotiations, and incorporating ocean conservation of nature with associated ecosystem issues into their own climate goals.
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE March 31 of Staff; Without Amendment (Rept
    3144 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - SENATE March 31 of Staff; without amendment (Rept. No. to the Committee on Post Ofiice and Civil H. Con. Res. 206. Concurrent resolution 1666). Referred to the House Calendar. Service. favoring the granting of the status of per­ Mr. SABATH: C9mmittee on Rules. House By Mr. STOCKMAN: inanent residence to certain aliens; to the Resolution 532. Resolution to direct the H. R. 7297. A bill to prevent Federal dam Committee on the Judiciary. Committee on Education and Labor to con­ and reservoir projects from interfering with duct an investigation of the Wage Stabili­ sustained-yield timber operations; to the zation Board; with amendment (Rept. No. Committee on Public Works. PETITIONS, ETC. 1667). Referred to the House Calendar. By Mr. WILLIAMS of Mississippi: Mr. SABATH: Committee on Rules. House H. R. 7298. A bill to authorize the consoli­ Under clause 1 of rule XXII, petitions Resolution 520. Resolution creating a se­ dation of the area of Vicksburg National Mili­ and papers were laid on the Clerk's desk lect committee to conduct an investiga­ tary Park, in the State of Mississippi, and for and referred as follows: tion and study of offensive and undesirable other purposes; to the Committee on Interior 658. By Mr. SMITH of Wisconsin: Petition books and radio and television programs; and Insular Affairs. of the Milwaukee Cooperative Milk Produc­ without amendment (Rept. No. 1668). Re­ ers. Over 1,000 people were present at the ferred to the House Calendar. annual meeting on March 11, 1952, to go on Mr. MADDEN: Committee on Rules. House MEMORIALS record opposing universal military service as Resolution 591.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boeing Company and the Militarymetropolitanindustrial
    1/3/2017 Center for the Study of the Pacific Northwest About Us Events Classroom Materials Pacific Northwest Resources Quarterly The Boeing Company and the Military­Metropolitan­Industrial Complex, 1945­1953 Richard S. Kirkendall Pacific Northwest Quarterly 85:4 (Oct. 1994), p. 137­149 This Boeing bomber embodies the transition to jet aircraft and the dependence on military that characterized company operations during the years following World War II. (Special Collections, University of Washington Libraries, Negative #10703. Photo by Boeing Company) The years of Harry Truman's presidency were crucial to the success of the Boeing Airplane Company. The president himself did not have close ties with the firm or great confidence in air power, but one part of the American state­­ the air force­­recognized Boeing's ability to serve air force interests and was in a stronger position than ever before to pursue those interests. Furthermore, the company now had another ally willing to enter the political arena on its behalf. This was Seattle. The people there had a new commitment to Boeing. Taking advantage of cold war fears, air force leaders lobbied for funds to be spent on bombers, and Seattle people worked to draw that money to their city by way of Boeing. As a consequence of the successes of these two groups in the Truman years, the company acquired the resources it needed to become the world leader in building commercial jets. In battling for Boeing, Seattle participated in what President Dwight D. Eisenhower later called the "military­ industrial complex." A historian, Roger Lotchin, recently proposed "metropolitan­military complex" as a substitute for Eisenhower's term.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean-Based Climate Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions
    Ocean-Based Climate Solutions in Nationally Determined Contributions April 2021 Update Author: Olivia Lopez © Adobe Stock ational climate goals under the Paris Agreement (Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs) are currently insufficient to address the climate crisis. Yet the promise of the Agreement is that it created not only an initial set of N commitments but also a “ratchet” cycle, in which countries submit NDCs every five years. Until recently, the international climate effort and the ocean conservation effort have been largely siloed. Although a majority of countries referenced the ocean in their first round of NDCs, only a minority discussed ocean actions as climate solutions. Fewer than 20 percent of countries with coastal blue carbon ecosystems, for example, discussed their role as carbon sinks.1,2,3 There is increasing recognition of the linkages between the ocean and climate change. As Parties to the Paris Agreement communicate their second round of national climate goals, this policy brief tracks the inclusion of concrete, ocean-based mitigation and adaptation actions. It sorts commitments first by ocean-based solution and then by country. Updates to this brief will post regularly, as countries submit further NDCs. As of this update, which analyzes 40 submissions from coastal countries, 37 include at least one ocean element. Contents Section titles link to relevant sections. This update analyzes the 2020/2021 NDC submissions from: Angola, Argentina, Australia, Bangladesh, Brunei Darussalam, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, European Union, Fiji, Iceland, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Lebanon, Maldives, Marshall Islands, Mexico, Monaco, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Republic of Korea, Russia, Senegal, Singapore, St.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Ocean Action Plan 2016 – 2026
    NEW YORK OCEAN ACTION PLAN 2016 – 2026 In collaboration with state and federal agencies, municipalities, tribal partners, academic institutions, non- profits, and ocean-based industry and tourism groups. Acknowledgments The preparation of the content within this document was developed by Debra Abercrombie and Karen Chytalo from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation and in cooperation and coordination with staff from the New York State Department of State. Funding was provided by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund’s Ocean & Great Lakes Program. Other New York state agencies, federal agencies, estuary programs, the New York Ocean and Great Lakes Coalition, the Shinnecock Indian Nation and ocean-based industry and user groups provided numerous revisions to draft versions of this document which were invaluable. The New York Marine Sciences Consortium provided vital recommendations concerning data and research needs, as well as detailed revisions to earlier drafts. Thank you to all of the members of the public and who participated in the stakeholder focal groups and for also providing comments and revisions. For more information, please contact: Karen Chytalo New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [email protected] 631-444-0430 Cover Page Photo credits, Top row: E. Burke, SBU SoMAS, M. Gove; Bottom row: Wolcott Henry- 2005/Marine Photo Bank, Eleanor Partridge/Marine Photo Bank, Brandon Puckett/Marine Photo Bank. NEW YORK OCEAN ACTION PLAN | 2016 – 2026 i MESSAGE FROM COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY The ocean and its significant resources have been at the heart of New York’s richness and economic vitality, since our founding in the 17th Century and continues today.
    [Show full text]
  • Trash Travels: the Truth—And the Consequences
    From Our Hands to the Sea, Around the Globe, and Through Time Contents Overview introduction from the president and ceo . 02 a message from philippe cousteau . 03 executive summary . 04 results from the 2009 international coastal cleanup . 06 participating countries map . .07 trash travels: the truth—and the consequences . 16 the pacific garbage patch: myths and realities . 24 international coastal cleanup sponsoring partners . .26 international coastal cleanup volunteer coordinators and sponsors . 30 The Marine Debris Index terminology . 39 methodology and research notes . 40 marine debris breakdown by countries and locations . 41 participation by countries and locations . 49 marine debris breakdown by us states . 50 participation by us states . 53. acknowledgments and photo credits . 55. sources . 56 Ocean Conservancy The International Coastal Cleanup Ocean Conservancy promotes healthy and diverse In partnership with volunteer organizations and ecosystems and opposes practices that threaten individuals across the globe, Ocean Conservancy’s ocean life and human life. Through research, International Coastal Cleanup engages people education, and science-based advocacy, Ocean to remove trash and debris from the world’s Conservancy informs, inspires, and empowers beaches and waterways, to identify the sources people to speak and act on behalf of the ocean. of debris, and to change the behaviors that cause In all its work, Ocean Conservancy strives to be marine debris in the first place. the world’s foremost advocate for the ocean. © OCEAN CONSERVANCY . ALL RIGHTS RESERVED . ISBN: 978-0-615-34820-9 LOOKING TOWARD THE 25TH ANNIVERSARY INTERNATIONAL COASTAL CLEANUP ON SEPTEMBER 25, 2010, Ocean Conservancy 01 is releasing this annual marine debris report spotlighting how trash travels to and throughout the ocean, and the impacts of that debris on the health of people, wildlife, economies, and ocean ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 73) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 73) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo .• Day, Yr.) THE WHITE HOUSE NOVEMBER 26, 1974 WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME DAY 7:00 a.m. TUESDAY -PHONE TIME ii ." ~ ~v ACTIVITY 0: ~ I--'-n---'---O-ut---i J!. ~ • 7:00 The President had breakfast. 7:48 The President went to the Oval Office. 8:10 8:30 The President met with: David A. Peterson, Chief, Central Intelligence Agency/Office of Current Intelligence (CIA/OCI) White House Support Staff Lt. Gen. Brent Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs 8:30 8:45 The President met with his Consultant, Richard B. Cheney. 9:18 The President went to the Cabinet Room. 9:18 10:35 The President met with bipartisan Congressional leaders. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX !lA. II 10:35 The President returned to the Oval Office. 10:38 The President went to the East Room. 10:38 10:52 The President participated in a signing ceremony for S. 386, the National Mass Transportation Assistance Act of 1974. For a list of attendees, see APPENDIX "B.lI Members of the press 10:52 The President returned to the Oval Office. 10:53 12:05 The President met with: Senator Hugh Scott (R-Pennsy1vania) Congressman John J. Rhodes (R-Arizona) William E. Timmons, Assistant 12:25 12:35 The President met with: Ralph J. Perk, Mayor (R-C1eve1and, Ohio) Thomas Duffy, Washington Representative for Mayor Perk Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Pocket Guide to Marine Debris
    POCKET GUIDE to MARINE D EBRIS The Ocean Conservancy is a private, nonprofit organization committed to protecting ocean ecosystems and conserving the global abundance and diversity of marine wildlife. Through science-based advocacy, research, and public education, The Ocean Conservancy informs, inspires, and empowers people to speak and act for the oceans. In all its work, The Ocean Conservancy strives to be the world’s foremost advocate for the oceans. The International Coastal Cleanup engages people to remove trash and debris from the world’s beaches and waterways, to identify the sources of debris, and to change the behaviors that cause pollution. © 2003, The Ocean Conservancy This document was first published in 1993. Funding for the original preparation of this document was provided by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER WITH VEGETABLE-BASED INKS. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . 1 How to Use This Book . 3 Quick Tips . 4 Shoreline Cleanup Underwater Cleanup Estimating Weights and Distances . 7 The World of Marine Debris . 8 Activities That Produce Debris . 11 Sample Data Card . 14 Items Listed on the Data Card . 16 Debris Items of Local Concern . 22 Potentially Hazardous Items. 24 Stranded or Entangled Animals . 26 Natural Items . 27 Peculiar Items. 28 Other Volunteer Opportunities . 29 National Marine Debris Monitoring Program RECON Storm Drain Sentries Ocean Action Network Ocean Wilderness More Information. 30 INTRODUCTION arine and other aquatic debris is more than an unsightly inconvenience for beach-bound vacationers or pleasure boaters; it is one of the world’s most M pervasive pollution problems affecting our waterways.
    [Show full text]