DOCSLIB.ORG

Miranda Warning Equivalents Abroad

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Miranda Warning Equivalents Abroad Miranda Warning Equivalents Abroad May 2016 The Law Library of Congress, Global Legal Research Center (202) 707-6462 (phone) • (866) 550-0442 (fax) • [email protected] • http://www.law.gov Contents I. Americas and the Caribbean ....................................................................................................1 Antigua and Barbuda .......................................................................................................................1 Argentina..........................................................................................................................................2 Belize ..............................................................................................................................................2 Bermuda ..........................................................................................................................................3 Bolivia ..............................................................................................................................................3 British Virgin Islands ......................................................................................................................3 Canada..............................................................................................................................................3 Cayman Islands ................................................................................................................................5 Colombia ..........................................................................................................................................6 Costa Rica ........................................................................................................................................7 Ecuador ............................................................................................................................................7 El Salvador .......................................................................................................................................7 Guyana .............................................................................................................................................8 Jamaica .............................................................................................................................................8 Mexico ............................................................................................................................................9 Montserrat ........................................................................................................................................9 Nicaragua ......................................................................................................................................10 Panama ...........................................................................................................................................10 Paraguay .........................................................................................................................................10 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ..................................................................................................11 Trinidad and Tobago ......................................................................................................................11 Uruguay..........................................................................................................................................12 II. East Asia and the Pacific .......................................................................................................13 Australia .........................................................................................................................................13 Cambodia .......................................................................................................................................15 Cook Islands...................................................................................................................................15 Federated States of Micronesia ......................................................................................................16 Fiji ..................................................................................................................................................16 Hong Kong .....................................................................................................................................17 Japan ..............................................................................................................................................17 Kiribati ...........................................................................................................................................18 Laos ................................................................................................................................................19 Malaysia .........................................................................................................................................20 Marshall Islands .............................................................................................................................21 New Zealand ..................................................................................................................................21 Palau ...............................................................................................................................................23 Papua New Guinea .........................................................................................................................23 Philippines......................................................................................................................................24 Samoa .............................................................................................................................................24 Solomon Islands .............................................................................................................................25 South Korea ..................................................................................................................................26 Taiwan............................................................................................................................................27 Thailand .........................................................................................................................................27 Tonga .............................................................................................................................................28 Tuvalu ............................................................................................................................................28 III. Europe and Central Asia .....................................................................................................29 Austria ............................................................................................................................................29 Azerbaijan ......................................................................................................................................29 Belgium ..........................................................................................................................................30 Bosnia and Herzegovina ................................................................................................................31 Croatia ............................................................................................................................................31 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................31 Denmark .........................................................................................................................................32 England and Wales ........................................................................................................................33 European Union .............................................................................................................................34 Finland ...........................................................................................................................................36 France .............................................................................................................................................37 Georgia ...........................................................................................................................................38 Germany .........................................................................................................................................38 Greece ............................................................................................................................................40 Iceland ............................................................................................................................................41 Ireland ............................................................................................................................................41 Italy ................................................................................................................................................42
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Drawing a Line Between Terry and Miranda: the Degree and Duration of Restraint Katherine M
    Drawing a Line between Terry and Miranda: The Degree and Duration of Restraint Katherine M. Swifit INTRODUCTION A felon answered the door in his underwear. Three police officers and three parole officers were there to search his apartment for a gun on the basis of a tip from his mother.! The police handcuffed him in the hallway outside his apartment, but told him he was not under ar- rest; the handcuffs were for his safety and the safety of the officers. Then they took him inside and asked about the gun, which he told them was in a shoebox on the table. The police never read the suspect his Miranda warnings. Was he "in custody"? Or was this merely a tem- porary detention? Mirandav Arizona' held that police may not interrogate a suspect who has been taken into custody without first issuing the familiar warnings Investigative stops, valid under Terry v Ohio,' are not sub- ject to Miranda's notice requirements.! Courts have not settled on a workable rule for determining custody in Terry stop cases. Part of the problem is that custody cases involve so many factors.! But more im- portant, coercive police behavior that would have required Miranda warnings in 1966 often is deemed reasonable under Terry today. This has led to a circuit split over whether coercive Terry stops constitute Miranda custody. The First, Fourth, and Eighth circuits hold t B.A., BJ. 1998, University of Missouri-Columbia; J.D. 2006, The University of Chicago. I The facts used in this example are drawn from United States v Newton, 369 F3d 659, 663 (2d Cir 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Head 122 — HONG KONG POLICE FORCE
    Head 122 — HONG KONG POLICE FORCE Controlling officer: the Commissioner of Police will account for expenditure under this Head. Estimate 2002–03................................................................................................................................... 12,445.8m Establishment ceiling 2002–03 (notional annual mid-point salary value) representing an estimated 34 597 non-directorate posts at 31 March 2002 reducing by 337 posts to 34 260 posts at 31 March 2003......................................................................................................................................... 9,473.1m In addition there will be 77 directorate posts at 31 March 2002 and at 31 March 2003. Capital Account commitment balance................................................................................................. 305.3m Controlling Officer’s Report Programmes Programme (1) Maintenance of Law and These programmes contribute to Policy Area 9: Internal Security Order in the Community (Secretary for Security). Programme (2) Prevention and Detection of Crime Programme (3) Reduction of Traffic Accidents Programme (4) Operations Detail Programme (1): Maintenance of Law and Order in the Community 2000–01 2001–02 2001–02 2002–03 (Actual) (Approved) (Revised) (Estimate) Financial provision ($m) 6,223.6 5,995.3 5,986.4 6,081.8 (–3.7%) (–0.1%) (+1.6%) Aim 2 The aim is to maintain law and order through the deployment of efficient and well-equipped uniformed police personnel throughout the land regions. Brief Description 3 Law
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Undercover Agents' Operations and Criminal
    This document is downloaded from CityU Institutional Repository, Run Run Shaw Library, City University of Hong Kong. Regulating undercover agents’ operations and criminal Title investigations in Hong Kong: What lessons can be learnt from the United Kingdom and South Australia Author(s) Chen, Yuen Tung Eutonia (陳宛彤) Chen, Y. T. E. (2012). Regulating undercover agents’ operations and criminal investigations in Hong Kong: What lessons can be learnt Citation from the United Kingdom and South Australia (Outstanding Academic Papers by Students (OAPS)). Retrieved from City University of Hong Kong, CityU Institutional Repository. Issue Date 2012 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2031/6855 This work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of Rights the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner. Access is unrestricted. Page | 1 LW 4635 INDEPENDENT RESEARCH Topic: Regulating Undercover Agents’ Operations and Criminal Investigations in Hong Kong: What Lessons can be learnt from the United Kingdom and South Australia? Student Name: CHEN Yuen Tung Eutonia1 Date: 13th April 2012 Word Count: 9570 (excluding cover page, footnote and bibliography) Number of Pages: 39 Abstract It is not a dispute that undercover police officers have a proper role to play in contemporary law enforcement. However, there is no clear legislation in Hong Kong on the issue of whether the undercover agent is, at law, an offender of crime(s). This paper would examine the limitations of the prevailing undercover policing laws in Hong Kong and suggest possible recommendations. In particular, a comparative study of the United Kingdom and South Australia would be made to investigate whether Hong Kong should enact a legislation regulating undercover operations and criminal investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT of CHARGES/WARRANT/WARRANTLESS ARREST PROCEDURES Revisions Approved: June 12, 2018 ______
    GENERAL ORDER 10-32 SECTION H-2 STATEMENT OF CHARGES/WARRANT/WARRANTLESS ARREST PROCEDURES Revisions Approved: June 12, 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________________ This General Order contains the following numbered sections: I. Directive II. Purpose III. General IV. Procedure V. Serving of Arrest Warrants VI. Serving of Arrest Warrants at Primary Residence VII. Execution of Arrest Warrant at Third Party Locations VIII. Forcible Entry IX. Criminal Arrests, Release Without Charges or Processing X. Effective Date I. DIRECTIVE This General Order is to provide direction in reference to adult arrestees, and will also apply to juveniles initially arrested for crimes for which the Juvenile Court has no jurisdiction. II. PURPOSE The purpose of this General Order is to establish guidelines and procedures for Statement of Charges, warrant and warrantless arrest procedures, as well as supervisory review and approval of all Statements of Charges prepared by subordinates prior to presentation to the appropriate officer of the Court. III. GENERAL A. The power of arrest is entrusted to the Baltimore City School Police Officers in a lawful and constitutional manner. Officers shall be familiar and comply with all local, state, and federal laws regarding constitutional rights of and processing of arrestees when affecting an arrest. B. All members of the Baltimore City School Police Force (BCSPF) will act in an unbiased manner when initiating police action and will not consider a person’s race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression or disability when GENERAL ORDER 10-32 SECTION H-2 STATEMENT OF CHARGES/WARRANT/WARRANTLESS ARREST PROCEDURES Revisions Approved: June 12, 2018 _____________________________________________________________________________________ making decisions related to an arrest.
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant Armenia*, ** International Covenant On
    United Nations CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2010 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant Joint second and third periodic reports of States parties Armenia*, ** [28 April 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. ** Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.10-46857 (E) 031210 CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction........................................................................................................ 1–12 3 II. Implementation of the Covenant.......................................................................... 13–670 5 Article 1 ............................................................................................................. 13–66 5 Article 2 ............................................................................................................. 67–106 12 Article 3 ............................................................................................................. 107–152 18 Article 4 ............................................................................................................. 153–175 24 Article 5 ............................................................................................................. 176–179
    [Show full text]
  • Out of County Felony Arrests
    Out of County Felony Arrests What is the procedure when a suspect is arrested for a felony that occurred in another county? Specifically, may officers immediately transport the suspect to the county in which the crime occurred, or must they first take him before a judge in the county of arrest? As we will explain in this article, it depends on two things: (1) Did the suspect have a right to a bail hearing in the county of arrest? (2) If the suspect is transported, will he be arraigned within the required time limits? There are a few other issues that might arise, and we will cover them, too. No-bail warrant If the suspect was arrested on a no-bail felony warrant, he does not have a right to a bail hearing in the county of arrest.1 He may therefore be transported without delay to the county in which the crime occurred. If the arrest was made by local officers, they must “immediately” notify officers in the county in which the warrant was issued that their suspect is in custody.2 Those officers must then pick up the suspect without unnecessary delay but, in any event, within five calendar days if the two counties are 400 miles apart or less, or within five court days if the two counties are over 400 miles apart.3 What about arraignment? A suspect must ordinarily be arraigned within 48 hours of his arrest.4 Although the courts will give officers some flexibility when the arrest occurs in a distant county,5 officers should attempt to comply with the 48 hour time limit.
    [Show full text]
  • Civilian Warrant Applications Faqs
    Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Civilian Warrant Applications What is a warrant application hearing? When a civilian makes a written application for the issuance of a criminal arrest warrant, a Judge makes a determination as to whether the application should be set down for a hearing. If the Judge determines that the application should be set down for a hearing, this form is filled out stating the crime alleged and setting down the time, date, and location of the hearing. The Judge delivers one copy to the applicant at the time of the application. The Clerk of Court mails one copy to the defendant at the address provided by the applicant. O.C.G.A. 17-4-40. (b) (1) If application is made for a warrant by a person other than a peace officer or law enforcement officer and the application alleges the commission of an offense against the penal laws, the judge or other officer shall schedule a warrant application hearing as provided in this subsection. O.C.G.A. 17-4-40. (b) (4) At the warrant application hearing, the rules regarding admission of evidence at a commitment hearing shall apply. The person seeking the warrant shall have the customary rights of presentation of evidence and cross- examination of witnesses. The person whose arrest is sought may cross-examine the person or persons applying for the warrant and any other witnesses testifying in support of the application at the hearing. The person whose arrest is sought may present evidence that probable cause does not exist for his or her arrest.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Access Officer (For Publication)
    List of Access Officer (for Publication) - (Hong Kong Police Force) District (by District Council Contact Telephone Venue/Premise/FacilityAddress Post Title of Access Officer Contact Email Conact Fax Number Boundaries) Number Western District Headquarters No.280, Des Voeux Road Assistant Divisional Commander, 3660 6616 [email protected] 2858 9102 & Western Police Station West Administration, Western Division Sub-Divisional Commander, Peak Peak Police Station No.92, Peak Road 3660 9501 [email protected] 2849 4156 Sub-Division Central District Headquarters Chief Inspector, Administration, No.2, Chung Kong Road 3660 1106 [email protected] 2200 4511 & Central Police Station Central District Central District Police Service G/F, No.149, Queen's Road District Executive Officer, Central 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Central and Western Centre Central District Shop 347, 3/F, Shun Tak District Executive Officer, Central Shun Tak Centre NPO 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Centre District 2/F, Chinachem Hollywood District Executive Officer, Central Central JPC Club House Centre, No.13, Hollywood 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 District Road POD, Western Garden, No.83, Police Community Relations Western JPC Club House 2546 9192 [email protected] 2915 2493 2nd Street Officer, Western District Police Headquarters - Certificate of No Criminal Conviction Office Building & Facilities Manager, - Licensing office Arsenal Street 2860 2171 [email protected] 2200 4329 Police Headquarters - Shroff Office - Central Traffic Prosecutions Enquiry Counter Hong Kong Island Regional Headquarters & Complaint Superintendent, Administration, Arsenal Street 2860 1007 [email protected] 2200 4430 Against Police Office (Report Hong Kong Island Room) Police Museum No.27, Coombe Road Force Curator 2849 8012 [email protected] 2849 4573 Inspector/Senior Inspector, EOD Range & Magazine MT.
    [Show full text]
  • Magistrate's Basic Duties to Appreciate the Role of a Magistrate in the Judicial Process, It Is Necessary to Understand How Magistrates Perform Their Basic Duties
    Magistrate's Basic Duties To appreciate the role of a magistrate in the judicial process, it is necessary to understand how magistrates perform their basic duties. To Issue Arrest Warrants Before magistrates can issue an arrest warrant in a criminal case, they must use their discretion to decide if there is "probable cause" to issue a process. Probable cause is a reasonable belief, based on facts that would cause a prudent person to feel that the accused committed the offense. To determine probable cause, magistrates must decide that there are facts logically indicating that the accused committed an offense and there must be some basis for determining that the facts are reliable. The facts are obtained from the complaint which consists of sworn statements of a citizen or a law enforcement officer relating to the commission of an alleged offense. These statements are made under oath before a magistrate and the magistrate may require the sworn statements to be reduced to writing and signed. If the magistrate decides that probable cause exists, an arrest warrant will be issued so that the accused may be brought to trial. To Issue Search Warrants When magistrates issue a search warrant, they are giving a law enforcement officer authority to conduct a search to aid an official investigation. The officer seeking the search warrant must make a complaint, under oath, stating the purpose of the search to the magistrate. The complaint must be supported by a written affidavit from the officer. In issuing the search warrant, the magistrate must describe the place to be searched, the property or person to be searched, and state that the magistrate has found probable cause to believe that the property or person constitutes evidence of a crime or tends to show that a person has committed a crime.
    [Show full text]
  • B-103 – Criminal Process/Arrest Procedures 1 of 6
    DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE Policy and Procedure Specific Policies P&P-B-103 Criminal Process/Arrest Procedures Effective Date: 11-10-16 Approval: Sheriff Number of Pages: 6 Supersedes: 01-15-13 References: Reevaluation Date: Standards: CALEA LE 1.1.4, LE 1.2.1, 16-3-101 to 16-3-110 C.R.S. Annually or as needed LE 1.2.5, LE 1.2.6, LE 1.2.7, LE 61.1.2, LE 74.3.1-2 I. POLICY It is the policy of this Office that members should make all arrests quietly, without attracting unnecessary attention or subjecting any prisoner to needless exposure, humiliation or severity. Every arrest shall be made in accordance with the law of the State of Colorado and in strict compliance with all applicable laws and the Constitution of the United States. <LE 1.2.1>, <LE 1.2.5>, <LE 1.2.6>, <LE 61.1.2>, <LE 74.3.2> II. CRIMINAL PROCESS PROCEDURE <LE 74.3.1> A. For the purposes of this order, an arrest is the taking of a person into custody, as authorized by law. Commissioned personnel, as peace officers, may make an arrest with or without a warrant. An arrest warrant is a court issued document authorizing the arrest of an individual for a specified criminal charge based upon sufficient probable cause. <LE 1.2.6><LE 74.3.1><LE 74.3.2>. B. The person making the arrest must inform the person to be arrested of the intention to arrest him or her, of the cause of the arrest, and the authority to make the arrest, except when the member making the arrest has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested is actually engaged in the commission of or the attempt to commit an offense, or the person to be arrested is pursued immediately after its completion, or after an escape.
    [Show full text]
  • Scope of Legal Authority of Private Security Personnel
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. Scope of legal Authority of Private Security Personnel 146908 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated in this document are those of the authors and do IIOt necessarily represent the oHicial position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this ., itlidi8d material has been gr~t~l!5lJ.ic Domain/LEAA U.S. Department of Justice to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permission of the ..~ owner. A REPORT PREPARED BY THE PRIVATE SECURITY ADVISORY COUNCIL, LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ... ' If SCOPE OF LEGAL AUTHORITY OF PRIVATE SECURITY PERSONNEL Prepared by the PRIVATE SECURITY ADVISORY COUNClu to the LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE ADMINISTRATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE August 1976 Points of view or opinions expressed in this document are those of the Private Security Advisory Council, and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the Law Enforce­ ment Assistance Administration, U.S. Department of Justice. PRIVATE SECURITY ADVISORY COUNCIL of the United States Department of Justice Law Enforcement Assistance Administration September 27, 1976 Mr. Richard W. Ve1de Administrator Law Enforcement Assistance Administration U.S. Department of Justice 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20531 Dear Mr. Ve1de: As Chairman of the Private Security Advisory Council, it gives me pleasure to forward the attached report, Scope of Legal Authority of Private Security Personnel, developed by the Council for the Law Enforcement Assistance Administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethical Hacking
    Ethical Hacking Alana Maurushat University of Ottawa Press ETHICAL HACKING ETHICAL HACKING Alana Maurushat University of Ottawa Press 2019 The University of Ottawa Press (UOP) is proud to be the oldest of the francophone university presses in Canada and the only bilingual university publisher in North America. Since 1936, UOP has been “enriching intellectual and cultural discourse” by producing peer-reviewed and award-winning books in the humanities and social sciences, in French or in English. Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Title: Ethical hacking / Alana Maurushat. Names: Maurushat, Alana, author. Description: Includes bibliographical references. Identifiers: Canadiana (print) 20190087447 | Canadiana (ebook) 2019008748X | ISBN 9780776627915 (softcover) | ISBN 9780776627922 (PDF) | ISBN 9780776627939 (EPUB) | ISBN 9780776627946 (Kindle) Subjects: LCSH: Hacking—Moral and ethical aspects—Case studies. | LCGFT: Case studies. Classification: LCC HV6773 .M38 2019 | DDC 364.16/8—dc23 Legal Deposit: First Quarter 2019 Library and Archives Canada © Alana Maurushat, 2019, under Creative Commons License Attribution— NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Printed and bound in Canada by Gauvin Press Copy editing Robbie McCaw Proofreading Robert Ferguson Typesetting CS Cover design Édiscript enr. and Elizabeth Schwaiger Cover image Fragmented Memory by Phillip David Stearns, n.d., Personal Data, Software, Jacquard Woven Cotton. Image © Phillip David Stearns, reproduced with kind permission from the artist. The University of Ottawa Press gratefully acknowledges the support extended to its publishing list by Canadian Heritage through the Canada Book Fund, by the Canada Council for the Arts, by the Ontario Arts Council, by the Federation for the Humanities and Social Sciences through the Awards to Scholarly Publications Program, and by the University of Ottawa.
    [Show full text]