DOCSLIB.ORG

Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant Armenia*, ** International Covenant On

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

United Nations CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 International Covenant on Distr.: General 22 November 2010 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant Joint second and third periodic reports of States parties Armenia*, ** [28 April 2010] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. ** Annexes can be consulted in the files of the Secretariat. GE.10-46857 (E) 031210 CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction........................................................................................................ 1–12 3 II. Implementation of the Covenant.......................................................................... 13–670 5 Article 1 ............................................................................................................. 13–66 5 Article 2 ............................................................................................................. 67–106 12 Article 3 ............................................................................................................. 107–152 18 Article 4 ............................................................................................................. 153–175 24 Article 5 ............................................................................................................. 176–179 28 Article 6 ............................................................................................................. 180–203 28 Article 7 ............................................................................................................. 204–243 31 Article 8 ............................................................................................................. 244–255 37 Article 9 ............................................................................................................. 256–282 39 Article 10 ........................................................................................................... 283–314 43 Article 11 ........................................................................................................... 315–316 47 Article 12 ........................................................................................................... 317–331 47 Article 13 ........................................................................................................... 332–339 49 Article 14 ........................................................................................................... 340–411 50 Article 15 ........................................................................................................... 412–417 58 Article 16 ........................................................................................................... 418–422 58 Article 17 ........................................................................................................... 423–431 59 Article 18 ........................................................................................................... 432–446 60 Article 19 ........................................................................................................... 447–473 63 Article 20 ........................................................................................................... 474–480 68 Article 21 ........................................................................................................... 481–495 70 Article 22 ........................................................................................................... 496–516 71 Article 23 ........................................................................................................... 517–537 74 Article 24 ........................................................................................................... 538–571 76 Article 25 ........................................................................................................... 572–607 80 Article 26 ........................................................................................................... 608–624 84 Article 27 ........................................................................................................... 625–670 86 2 GE.10-46857 CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 I. Introduction 1. The Second and Third Joint Periodic Report of the Republic of Armenia on the Implementation of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (hereinafter referred to as “the Covenant”) is hereby presented according to Article 40 of the United Nations International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights based on the guiding principles elaborated by the United Nations for preparing reports. The Report has been elaborated by the interagency working group established upon the Decision of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia No. 320-A of 21 April 2009, which was composed of the representatives from all the interested ministries and agencies: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Healthcare of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Armenia Government of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Energy and Natural Resources of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Science and Education of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Culture of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Armenia Ministry of Territorial Administration of the Republic of Armenia Police adjunct to the Government of the Republic of Armenia Staff to the President of the Republic of Armenia Staff of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia General Prosecutor’s Office of the Republic of Armenia National Statistical Service of the Republic of Armenia Judicial Department of the Republic of Armenia Office of the Human Rights Defender of the Republic of Armenia Trade Union Confederation of the Republic of Armenia 2. This Report was approved by the Government of the Republic of Armenia on 29 January 2010. It covers the period from 1999 to 2009. The concluding observations and recommendations (CCPR/C/79/Add.100) made by the Human Rights Committee on the previous report of the Republic of Armenia have been taken into consideration in this Report. 3. In 2005, the President of the Republic of Armenia signed a decree on setting referendum on the draft law “On making amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia.” Based on Article 111 of the Constitution and Article 7 of the Law of the Republic of Armenia “On referendum”, as well as taking as a basis the draft law “On GE.10-46857 3 CCPR/C/ARM/2-3 making amendments to the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia”, the referendum was appointed for 27 November 2005. Amendments and supplements have been made through referendum to the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia (http://www.genproc.am/ main/en/70/), where the provisions on fundamental human and civic rights and freedoms were also subjected to essential reforms by bringing them closer in line with the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 4. Parliamentary elections were held in the Republic of Armenia on 30 May 1999, 25 May 2003, as well as on 12 May 2007, and the presidential elections were held on 19 February/15 March 2003 and then on 19 February 2008. 5. Since 1992, becoming a member of the United Nations and acknowledging the principles of the universal values, human rights protection and establishment of democracy as an inseparable part of the state ideology, Armenia has been actively involved in the activities launched within the framework of this universal organization and has cooperated with many structures and subdivisions of the organization. 6. As a result of the elections held at the United Nations in 2002, the Republic of Armenia was elected from among the Group of Eastern European countries as a member of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights and was re-elected in 2004. Moreover, in 2005–2006 the Armenian representative acted as the Vice-Chairman of the Commission. This was, first and foremost, a vivid evidence of Armenia’s international recognition and enhanced reputation, especially in the sphere of human rights protection. 7. The Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Armenia was adopted in 1998 and entered into force in January 1999. It is regularly amended, becoming more compliant with the international commitments of the Republic of Armenia. The Electoral Code of the Republic of Armenia was adopted on 5 February 1999. It was amended on 26 December 2008. The new Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia was adopted on 18 April 2003 and entered into force on 1 August 2003. The Law of the Republic of Armenia “On Human Rights Defender” was adopted on 21 October 2003 and entered into force on 1 January 2004. The new Labour Code of the Republic of Armenia was adopted on 9 November 2004 and entered into force on 21 June 2005. The Judicial Code of the Republic of Armenia was adopted on 21 February 2007 and entered into force on 18 May 2007. The comprehensive national program on human rights protection is currently under development, pending approval in 2011. 8. The Republic of Armenia is a signatory to numerous
Recommended publications
  • Amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

    Amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

    April 27, 2020 Honorable Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 Dear Madam Speaker: I have the honor to submit to the Congress an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that has been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code. Accompanying the amended rule are the following materials that were submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code: a transmittal letter to the Court dated October 23, 2019; a redline version of the rule with committee note; an excerpt from the September 2019 report of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Judicial Conference of the United States; and an excerpt from the June 2019 report of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules. Sincerely, /s/ John G. Roberts, Jr. April 27, 2020 Honorable Michael R. Pence President, United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 Dear Mr. President: I have the honor to submit to the Congress an amendment to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that has been adopted by the Supreme Court of the United States pursuant to Section 2072 of Title 28, United States Code. Accompanying the amended rule are the following materials that were submitted to the Court for its consideration pursuant to Section 331 of Title 28, United States Code: a transmittal letter to the Court dated October 23, 2019; a redline version of the rule with committee note; an excerpt from the September 2019 report of the Committee on Rules of Practice and Procedure to the Judicial Conference of the United States; and an excerpt from the June 2019 report of the Advisory Committee on Civil Rules.
  • Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 Initial Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council Of

    Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 Initial Periodical Report Presented to the Secretary General of the Council Of

    Strasbourg, 3 September 2003 MIN-LANG/PR (2003) 7 EUROPEAN CHARTER FOR REGIONAL OR MINORITY LANGUAGES Initial Periodical Report presented to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe in accordance with Article 15 of the Charter ARMENIA The First Report of the Republic of Armenia According to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages June 2003, Yerevan 2 INTRODUCTION The Republic of Armenia signed the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages on May 11, 2001. In respect of Armenia the Charter has come into force since May 1, 2002. The RA introduces the following report according to Paragraph 1 of Article 15 of the European Charter for Regional or Minority Languages. This report has been elaborated and developed by the State Language Board at the Ministry of Education and Science based on the information submitted by the relevant ministries NGOs and administrative offices, taking into consideration the remarks and suggestions made by them and all parties interested, while discussing the following report. PART I Historical Outline Being one of the oldest countries in the world, for the first time in its new history Armenia regained its independence on May 28, 1918. The first Republic existed till November 29, 1920, when Armenia after forced sovetalization joined the Soviet Union, becoming on of the 15 republics. As a result of referendum the Republic of Armenia revived its independence on September 21, 1991. Armenia covers an area of 29,8 thousand km2, the population is nearly 32000001. Armenia borders on Iran, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Turkey.
  • European Union Foreign Affairs Journal

    European Union Foreign Affairs Journal

    European Union Foreign Affairs Journal eQuarterly for European Foreign, Foreign Trade, Development, Security Policy, EU-Third Country Relations and Regional Integration (EUFAJ) N° 04– 2015 ISSN 2190-6122 Contents Editorial ................................................................................................................................................................ 4 New Members of the Editorial Advisory Board ................................................................................................... 5 Presidential Elections in Belarus from 11.10.2015: What an Election Observer Mission Could Find Out .......... 6 The Systematic Roots of Russia’s Recession Marek Dabrowski ............................................................................................................................................... 20 Debate on Presidential Versus Parliamentary Systems: Should Armenia Opt for the Parliamentary System? Alik Sargsyan ...................................................................................................................................................... 38 Europe’s True Immigration Capacity: What We Can Learn from the US Green Card System Reinhilde Veugelers / Grace Choi ...................................................................................................................... 68 Trafficking in Human Beings in Conflict and Post-conflict Situation ................................................................ 75 Foreign Labour Force in the Economy of Modern Russia: Tendencies
  • Evidence in Civil Law – Germany

    Evidence in Civil Law – Germany

    © Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retriveal system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Title: Evidence in Civil Law – Germany Authors: Christian Wolf, Nicola Zeibig First published 2015 by Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement Maribor Grajska ulica 7, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia www.lex-localis.pres, [email protected] Book Series: Law & Society Series Editor: Tomaž Keresteš CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 347(430)(0.034.2) WOLF, Christian, 1958- Evidence in civil law - Germany [Elektronski vir] / Christian Wolf, Nicola Zeibig. - El. knjiga. - Maribor : Institute for Local Self-Government and Public Procurement, 2015. - (Lex localis) (Book series Law & society) Način dostopa (URL): http://books.lex-localis.press/evidenceincivillaw/germany ISBN 978-961-6842-49-5 (epub) 1. Zeibig, Nicola 281112576 Price: free copy Evidence in Civil Law – Germany Christian Wolf Nicola Zeibig Evidence in Civil Law – Germany 1 CHRISTIAN WOLF & NICOLA ZEIBIG ABSTRACT The fundamental principles in civil procedure do not only serve as guiding principles for civil procedure in general, but are especially relevant in the taking of evidence process. The German Code of Civil Procedure lays down various rules in its part on the taking of evidence, which aim to specify the scope of the fundamental procedural principles as well as their limitations. This reports purposes to depict the taking of evidence process under German law by illustrating its interaction with said principles.
  • 50146-001: Distribution Network Rehabilitation, Efficiency

    50146-001: Distribution Network Rehabilitation, Efficiency

    Initial E nvironmental E xamination Project Number: 50146-001 April 2017 Distribution Network R ehabilitation, E fficiency Improvement, and Augmentation (R epublic of Armenia) Prepared by Tetra Tech E S , Inc. for the Asian Development Bank This initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Y our attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Armenia: ENA-Modernisation of Distribution Network Initial Environmental Examination: Draft Final Report Prepared by April 2017 1 ADB/EBRD Armenia: ENA - Modernisation of Distribution Network Initial Environmental Examination Draft Final Report April 2017 Prepared by Tetra Tech ES, Inc. 1320 N Courthouse Rd, Suite 600 | Arlington, VA 22201, United States Tel +1 703 387 2100 | Fax +1 703 243 0953 www.tetratech.com Prepared by Tetra Tech ES, Inc 2 ENA - Modernisation of Distribution Network Initial Environmental Examination Table of Contents Table of Contents ................................................................................................................ 3 Abbreviations and Acronyms ...........................................................................................
  • Materials of Conference Devoted to 80 Anniversary

    Materials of Conference Devoted to 80 Anniversary

    YEREVAN STATE UNIVERSITY FACULTY OF LAW MATERIALS OF CONFERENCE DEVOTED TO 80TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FACULTY OF LAW OF THE YEREVAN STATE UNIVERSITY Yerevan YSU Press 2014 UDC 340(479.25) Editorial board Gagik Ghazinyan Editor in Chief, Dean of the Faculty of Law, Yerevan State University, Corresponding member of the RA National Academy of Sciences, Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor Armen Haykyants Doctor of Legal Sciences, Professor of the Chair of Civil Law of the Yerevan State University Yeghishe Kirakosyan Candidate of Legal Sciences, Docent of the Chair of European and International Law of the Yerevan State University, Adviser to the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Armenia The present publication includes reports presented during the Conference devoted to the 80th Anniversary of the Law Department of Yerevan State University. Articles relate to different fields of jurisprudence and represent the main line of legal thought in Armenia. Authors of the articles are the members of the faculty of the Law Department of Yerevan State University. The present volume can be useful for legal scholars, legal professionals, Ph.D. students, as well as others, who are interested in different legal issues relating to the legal system of Armenia. ISBN 978-5-8084-1903-2 © YSU Press, 2014 2 Contents Artur Vagharshyan ISSUES OF LEGAL REGULATION OF FILLING THE GAPS OF POSITIVE LAW IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ....................... 9 Taron Simonyan NASH EQUILIBRIUM AS A MEAN FOR DETERMINATION OF RULES OF LAW (FOR SOVEREIGN ACTORS) ............................ 17 Alvard Aleksanyan YEZNIK KOGHBATSI’S LEGAL VIEWS ...................................... 25 Sergey Kocharyan PRINCIPLE OF LEGAL LEGITIMACY IN THE PHASE SYSTEM OF LEGAL REGULATION MECHANISM ..........................................
  • Enforcement of Copyright in Australia And, in Particular, On

    Enforcement of Copyright in Australia And, in Particular, On

    The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia &UDFNLQJGRZQRQFRS\FDWV HQIRUFHPHQWRIFRS\ULJKWLQ$XVWUDOLD House of Representatives Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs November 2000 © Commonwealth of Australia 2000 ISBN 0 642 36634 9 &RQWHQWV Foreword...............................................................................................................................................vi Membership of the Committee............................................................................................................ viii Terms of reference ................................................................................................................................x List of abbreviations............................................................................................................................ xiii List of recommendations......................................................................................................................xv 1 Introduction...............................................................................................................1 Referral of inquiry....................................................................................................................... 1 Background to the inquiry......................................................................................................... 2 The inquiry process ................................................................................................................... 3 The report...................................................................................................................................
  • Oklahoma Statutes Title 12. Civil Procedure

    Oklahoma Statutes Title 12. Civil Procedure

    OKLAHOMA STATUTES TITLE 12. CIVIL PROCEDURE §12-1. Title of chapter...........................................................................................................................30 §12-2. Force of common law.................................................................................................................30 §12-3. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-4. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-5. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-6. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-7. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-8. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................30 §12-9. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984.............................................................31 §12-10. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31 §12-11. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31 §12-12. Repealed by Laws 1984, c. 164, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 1984...........................................................31
  • Transnational Armenian Terrorism and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict of 1988-1994) End

    Transnational Armenian Terrorism and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict of 1988-1994) End

    Karabakh Oleg KUZNETSOV, PhD in History, MCL (Moscow, Russia) First Terrorist War: A Look from Russia (Transnational Armenian Terrorism and Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict of 1988-1994) End. For the beginning, see İRS-Heritage 2 (21), 3 (22) 2015 n addition to numerous acts of terrorism and wide- spread terrorist crimes related to the organization by Iforeign nationals of illegal armed groups in the terri- tory of Armenia and their participation in the activities of such groups, representatives of the Armenian side to the conflict committed other crimes of a similar nature during the Karabakh war, facts that were recorded on the Azerbaijani side. First of all, we are talking about a Car in which journalist S. Asgarova, Lt-Col Larionov, Maj Ivanov and Sgt Goyek were shot dead by Armenian terrorists on 9 January 1991 58 www.irs-az.com 4(23), WINTER 2015 very specific terrorist crime like an armed insurgency, criminal liability for which is stipulated by Article 279 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The main qualifying feature of this criminal act is the motiva- tion and goal-setting of participation in the crime: those guilty of committing it take action to change the constitutional system or the territorial integrity of the country. Actions of this kind were committed by soldiers of Armenian origin under the commander of the 2nd Battalion of the 336th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the 23rd Motorized Infantry Division of the 4th Army of the CIS Joint Armed Forces under the command of Major Seyran Ohanyan, who not only seized fighting equipment - infantry fighting vehicles (BMP-2) - without a military order, but also used them against Azerbaijani territorial defense units in the battle of 25 February 1992 for the town of Khojali, which subsequently led to mass deaths of civilians in this town.
  • Out of County Felony Arrests

    Out of County Felony Arrests

    Out of County Felony Arrests What is the procedure when a suspect is arrested for a felony that occurred in another county? Specifically, may officers immediately transport the suspect to the county in which the crime occurred, or must they first take him before a judge in the county of arrest? As we will explain in this article, it depends on two things: (1) Did the suspect have a right to a bail hearing in the county of arrest? (2) If the suspect is transported, will he be arraigned within the required time limits? There are a few other issues that might arise, and we will cover them, too. No-bail warrant If the suspect was arrested on a no-bail felony warrant, he does not have a right to a bail hearing in the county of arrest.1 He may therefore be transported without delay to the county in which the crime occurred. If the arrest was made by local officers, they must “immediately” notify officers in the county in which the warrant was issued that their suspect is in custody.2 Those officers must then pick up the suspect without unnecessary delay but, in any event, within five calendar days if the two counties are 400 miles apart or less, or within five court days if the two counties are over 400 miles apart.3 What about arraignment? A suspect must ordinarily be arraigned within 48 hours of his arrest.4 Although the courts will give officers some flexibility when the arrest occurs in a distant county,5 officers should attempt to comply with the 48 hour time limit.
  • Civilian Warrant Applications Faqs

    Civilian Warrant Applications Faqs

    Frequently Asked Questions Concerning Civilian Warrant Applications What is a warrant application hearing? When a civilian makes a written application for the issuance of a criminal arrest warrant, a Judge makes a determination as to whether the application should be set down for a hearing. If the Judge determines that the application should be set down for a hearing, this form is filled out stating the crime alleged and setting down the time, date, and location of the hearing. The Judge delivers one copy to the applicant at the time of the application. The Clerk of Court mails one copy to the defendant at the address provided by the applicant. O.C.G.A. 17-4-40. (b) (1) If application is made for a warrant by a person other than a peace officer or law enforcement officer and the application alleges the commission of an offense against the penal laws, the judge or other officer shall schedule a warrant application hearing as provided in this subsection. O.C.G.A. 17-4-40. (b) (4) At the warrant application hearing, the rules regarding admission of evidence at a commitment hearing shall apply. The person seeking the warrant shall have the customary rights of presentation of evidence and cross- examination of witnesses. The person whose arrest is sought may cross-examine the person or persons applying for the warrant and any other witnesses testifying in support of the application at the hearing. The person whose arrest is sought may present evidence that probable cause does not exist for his or her arrest.
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.