DOCSLIB.ORG

2020 Cross-Border Corporate Criminal Liability Survey 2020 Cross-Border Corporate Criminal Liability Survey

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2020 Cross-Border Corporate Criminal Liability Survey 2020 Cross-Border Corporate Criminal Liability Survey 2019 ANNUAL M&A REVIEW 2020 CROSS-BORDER CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY SURVEY 2020 CROSS-BORDER CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY SURVEY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION . 1 MIDDLE EAST . 106 GLOSSARY . 4 ISRAEL . 107 AFRICA . 5 SAUDI ARABIA. 113 SOUTH AFRICA. .. 6 UNITED ARAB EMIRATES . 117 ASIA PACIFIC . 10 NORTH AMERICA . 121 AUSTRALIA . .11 CANADA . 122 CHINA . 16 MEXICO . 126 HONG KONG . 20 UNITED STATES . 131 INDIA . 25 SOUTH AMERICA . .. 135 INDONESIA . 30 ARGENTINA . 136 JAPAN . 34 BRAZIL . 141 SINGAPORE . 38 CHILE . 145 TAIWAN (REPUBLIC OF CHINA) . 43 VENEZUELA . 149 CENTRAL AMERICA . 47 CONTACTS . 152 COSTA RICA . 48 EUROPE . 52 BELGIUM . 53 FRANCE . 57 GERMANY . 62 ITALY . 69 NETHERLANDS. .. 76 RUSSIA . 84 SPAIN . 87 SWITZERLAND . 92 TURKEY . 96 UKRAINE . 99 UNITED KINGDOM . 103 Jones Day White Paper 2020 CROSS-BORDER CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY SURVEY INTRODUCTION For any company, the risk that employees or agents may countries, and the ability of industry participants to engage in criminal conduct in connection with their work assert (accurately or inaccurately) that a competitor has and thereby potentially expose the company (or at least broken the law . Multinational companies are at ever- the responsible individuals) to criminal, administrative, increasing risk of aggressive criminal enforcement, and/or civil liability is ever present; for multinational often across numerous jurisdictions at once . companies, which are necessarily subject to the laws To be sure, aggressive enforcement of corporate of multiple jurisdictions, this risk is only heightened . crime can help ensure that such crime is appropriately How a company manages the risk of corporate criminal punished and deterred and that the rights and interests liability, in particular, can not only determine its success, of victims are honored through a criminal proceeding . but also protect (or imperil) its viability . The stakes do But the reasonableness of a criminal enforcement not get much higher than when the company is facing a action is not always apparent, especially when the criminal investigation or, worse, a criminal prosecution . alleged misconduct could instead be more effectively When armed government agents raid corporate offices, redressed through civil or administrative action . when executives are arrested and paraded before news cameras in handcuffs, when shareholders bring Moreover, in cross-border matters, it can be far lawsuits alleging malfeasance and neglect on the part from clear whether a corporate entity could even be of directors and officers, when legislators clamor for criminally charged for certain conduct and whether corporate accountability in politically charged public a particular country would actually have jurisdiction hearings, and especially when criminal charges against to bring a criminal case against the entity premised the company are announced, the reality is stark—the on that conduct . This is because the jurisdictional company’s good name and culture are under attack, analysis in such matters can be complex, and because and its very existence may hang in the balance . countries differ not only in what they criminalize, but also in whether and how corporations can be punished The sudden demise of the global accounting firm under their laws . Thus, even companies with robust Arthur Andersen in the aftermath of its conviction on compliance programs and legal departments may obstruction of justice charges in the Enron scandal face challenges in understanding, implementing, is the best—but only one—example of the potentially and adapting to regulatory requirements across the devastating consequences for companies that find jurisdictions in which they operate . themselves in the cross-hairs of a criminal investigation . In the nearly 20 years since Arthur Andersen ceased Identifying, evaluating, and mitigating the risk of to be, the enforcement of corporate crime has only corporate criminal liability is a process . An important escalated . This trend shows no signs of abating . At step in this process for any multinational company is any given moment, a number of the world’s leading understanding the landscape of corporate criminal business organizations are under scrutiny from law liability and enforcement for every jurisdiction in enforcement authorities who possess an assortment which the company does business . Because these of investigative tools and an increasing appetite to landscapes change over time, sometimes abruptly, this use them to combat corporate crime, sometimes process must be ongoing and continuous . with questionable judgment and motivations . And the opportunities for enforcement officials across the world This Survey is designed to aid this process by to launch investigations into allegations of corporate providing an overview of relevant laws in 31 countries crime are abundant—with whistleblower laws offering and territories spanning the globe . The Survey reports substantial financial “bounties” to persons who disclose on significant—even dramatic—variations in the legal violations, the revelation of corporate scandals in landscape of corporate criminal liability, including on media reports, the increased sharing of information foundational topics like these: by and among enforcement authorities in multiple Jones Day White Paper 1 2020 CROSS-BORDER CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY SURVEY • Corporate criminal defendants . In many countries, They form the basis for foreign enforcement actions— criminal prohibitions apply generally to corporations providing legal authorization for law enforcement just as they apply to natural persons . Other countries activity, shaping the scope of criminal investigations, do not have corporate criminal liability regimes (e g. ., determining the tools and leverage available to Turkey), although companies there may still face prosecutors, and setting the terms of a company’s sanctions . Others extend corporate criminal liability engagement with enforcement authorities . Outside the only to select offenses (e g. ., Brazil) or have “quasi- context of a pending enforcement action, an evaluation criminal liability” for corporations with some hallmarks of foreign prosecution risk can provide guideposts for of criminal liability (e g. ., Italy) . company decisions on designing and implementing effective international compliance programs, Corporate criminal liability for acts of others . • A addressing employee misconduct, monitoring activities corporation can act only through its agents . Countries of third-party agents, and conducting due diligence on that do provide for corporate criminal liability differ vendors and other potential business partners . on the circumstances under which a corporation is criminally liable for the acts of those agents, In this era of ever-increasing enforcement of corporate including both natural persons and subsidiaries . In crime, the trend worldwide is toward expanding some countries, so-called vicarious liability is linked corporate criminal liability and imposing greater to acts of senior officers (e g. ., Canada); in others, demands on corporate self-governance and social the question focuses on the wrongdoer’s actions, responsibility . Resolutions of criminal investigations that functions, authority, and responsibility within the include a company’s agreement to pay nine- or even corporation (e g. ., Israel) . ten-figure financial penalties are now commonplace, as is political pressure to prosecute individuals and Corporate consequences . • Depending on the companies alleged to be responsible for failed or country, corporations face a wide range of criminal suspicious transactions or economic downturns . Greater penalties—as well as collateral consequences of international cooperation between law enforcement a criminal conviction—including fines, forfeiture, agencies has accelerated this trend, increasing both restitution, probation, debarment from government the number and efficacy of cross-border investigations contracts, loss of licenses or security clearances, and the associated risks to multinational corporations . temporary suspension, or even dissolution . The responsibility of addressing foreign prosecution • Corporate incentives . Countries vary with respect risk is, thus, more pressing and more challenging than to the incentives their laws provide to companies to ever before . mitigate the risk of corporate criminal liability and This Survey is intended as a starting point to give related penalties, if not avoid liability altogether . In some sense of the scope of corporate criminal liability some countries, the implementation of an appropriate laws and trends in a particular country, but it is not a compliance program can be a defense to corporate substitute for a review of the actual regulations in light criminal liability in certain situations (e g. ., Spain); in of a particular set of facts . This Survey should not be others, it can be relevant to charging or sentencing construed as legal advice on any specific facts or decisions (e g. ., United States) . Countries likewise circumstances . offer differing incentives for companies to self-report wrongdoing, with some requiring it as a matter of If questions come up in relation to the laws of a specific law in certain situations . Countries also differ on the country, the last section of this Survey lists contacts at protections and incentives offered to whistleblowers . Jones Day who are in a position to provide information Each country’s answers to these and other foundational
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism
    i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism May, 2018 United Nations University – Centre for Policy Research The UNU Centre for Policy Research (UNU-CPR) is a UN-focused think tank based at UNU Centre in Tokyo. UNU-CPR’s mission is to generate policy research that informs major UN policy processes in the fields of peace and security, humanitarian affairs, and global development. i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s Institute for Integrated Transitions IFIT’s aim is to help fragile and conflict-affected states achieve more sustainable transitions out of war or authoritarianism by serving as an independent expert resource for locally-led efforts to improve political, economic, social and security conditions. IFIT seeks to transform current practice away from fragmented interventions and toward more integrated solutions that strengthen peace, democracy and human rights in countries attempting to break cycles of conflict or repression. Cover image nigeria. 2017. Maiduguri. After being screened for association with Boko Haram and held in military custody, this child was released into a transit center and the care of the government and Unicef. © Paolo Pellegrin/Magnum Photos. This material has been supported by UK aid from the UK government; the views expressed are those of the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 11 Issue 2 Issue 2 - A Symposium on Trade Article 1 Regulation and Practices 3-1958 "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute Heinrich Kronstein Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Labor and Employment Law Commons Recommended Citation Heinrich Kronstein, "Cartels" Under the New German Cartel Statute, 11 Vanderbilt Law Review 271 (1958) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol11/iss2/1 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 11 MARcH, 1958 Nuavim 2 A SYMPOSIUM ON TRADE REGULATION AND PRACTICES "CARTELS" UNDER THE NEW GERMAN CARTEL STATUTE HEINRICH KRONSTEIN* Introduction On January 1, 1958, the "Cartel Statute" of the Federal Republic of Germany' became effective. American interests in this event are threefold: (1) During the past decade Americans have tried to convince the Western world that in an industrial, democratic society legislation of the American antitrust type is imperative. Is the German cartel statute a piece of legislation of this type? (2) The enactment of the statute brings to an end the application of Law No. 56 enacted by the American Military Government on January 28, 1947. The Paris Treaty between the Allied Powers and Germany provided that the Allied "cartel laws," though administered by the German Minister of Economics, should remain in effect until the German legislature could agree on a new statute.
    [Show full text]
  • Head 122 — HONG KONG POLICE FORCE
    Head 122 — HONG KONG POLICE FORCE Controlling officer: the Commissioner of Police will account for expenditure under this Head. Estimate 2002–03................................................................................................................................... 12,445.8m Establishment ceiling 2002–03 (notional annual mid-point salary value) representing an estimated 34 597 non-directorate posts at 31 March 2002 reducing by 337 posts to 34 260 posts at 31 March 2003......................................................................................................................................... 9,473.1m In addition there will be 77 directorate posts at 31 March 2002 and at 31 March 2003. Capital Account commitment balance................................................................................................. 305.3m Controlling Officer’s Report Programmes Programme (1) Maintenance of Law and These programmes contribute to Policy Area 9: Internal Security Order in the Community (Secretary for Security). Programme (2) Prevention and Detection of Crime Programme (3) Reduction of Traffic Accidents Programme (4) Operations Detail Programme (1): Maintenance of Law and Order in the Community 2000–01 2001–02 2001–02 2002–03 (Actual) (Approved) (Revised) (Estimate) Financial provision ($m) 6,223.6 5,995.3 5,986.4 6,081.8 (–3.7%) (–0.1%) (+1.6%) Aim 2 The aim is to maintain law and order through the deployment of efficient and well-equipped uniformed police personnel throughout the land regions. Brief Description 3 Law
    [Show full text]
  • IN TAX LEADERS WOMEN in TAX LEADERS | 4 AMERICAS Latin America
    WOMEN IN TAX LEADERS THECOMPREHENSIVEGUIDE TO THE WORLD’S LEADING FEMALE TAX ADVISERS SIXTH EDITION IN ASSOCIATION WITH PUBLISHED BY WWW.INTERNATIONALTAXREVIEW.COM Contents 2 Introduction and methodology 8 Bouverie Street, London EC4Y 8AX, UK AMERICAS Tel: +44 20 7779 8308 4 Latin America: 30 Costa Rica Fax: +44 20 7779 8500 regional interview 30 Curaçao 8 United States: 30 Guatemala Editor, World Tax and World TP regional interview 30 Honduras Jonathan Moore 19 Argentina 31 Mexico Researchers 20 Brazil 31 Panama Lovy Mazodila 24 Canada 31 Peru Annabelle Thorpe 29 Chile 32 United States Jason Howard 30 Colombia 41 Venezuela Production editor ASIA-PACIFIC João Fernandes 43 Asia-Pacific: regional 58 Malaysia interview 59 New Zealand Business development team 52 Australia 60 Philippines Margaret Varela-Christie 53 Cambodia 61 Singapore Raquel Ipo 54 China 61 South Korea Managing director, LMG Research 55 Hong Kong SAR 62 Taiwan Tom St. Denis 56 India 62 Thailand 58 Indonesia 62 Vietnam © Euromoney Trading Limited, 2020. The copyright of all 58 Japan editorial matter appearing in this Review is reserved by the publisher. EUROPE, MIDDLE EAST & AFRICA 64 Africa: regional 101 Lithuania No matter contained herein may be reproduced, duplicated interview 101 Luxembourg or copied by any means without the prior consent of the 68 Central Europe: 102 Malta: Q&A holder of the copyright, requests for which should be regional interview 105 Malta addressed to the publisher. Although Euromoney Trading 72 Northern & 107 Netherlands Limited has made every effort to ensure the accuracy of this Southern Europe: 110 Norway publication, neither it nor any contributor can accept any regional interview 111 Poland legal responsibility whatsoever for consequences that may 86 Austria 112 Portugal arise from errors or omissions, or any opinions or advice 87 Belgium 115 Qatar given.
    [Show full text]
  • Cartel Enforcement Global Review – September 2020 CARTEL ENFORCEMENT GLOBAL REVIEW – SEPTEMBER 2020
    Cartel Enforcement Global review – September 2020 CARTEL ENFORCEMENT GLOBAL REVIEW – SEPTEMBER 2020 Fight against cartels continues to consolidate around the world The period between 2017 and the beginning of 2020 has shown the importance of the prosecution of cartels in the context of global competition law enforcement. Competition authorities are intensifying their initiatives and concluding investigations in strategic sectors such as technology and digital services, construction, transport and mobility services, life sciences, financial services, retail and consumer goods, agriculture, food and energy. In many jurisdictions, fines imposed against participants In the EU, Directive (EU) 2019/1 (ECN+ Directive), in cartels have increased significantly or remained at a aimed at providing competition authorities of high level in the reference period. the Member States with the means to implement competition rules more effectively and to guarantee In 2019, the European Commission imposed cartel the proper functioning of the internal market, should be fines of around EUR1.4 billion. Taking into account fines implemented by Member States by February 2021. of National Competition Authorities, the total fines imposed within the EU (excluding the UK) exceeded The criminal prosecution of cartels continues to be a key EUR4 billion in 2019. factor in many jurisdictions, with particular regard to US, Canada, Australia and Ireland. New Zealand introduced In the US, the amount of fines for cartels, criminal penalties adopting a law that will come into after an important decrease in 2017, rose again force on April 8, 2021. In the UK, the authorities to USD356 million in 2019. continue to seek directors’ disqualification orders in addition to monetary penalties.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Undercover Agents' Operations and Criminal
    This document is downloaded from CityU Institutional Repository, Run Run Shaw Library, City University of Hong Kong. Regulating undercover agents’ operations and criminal Title investigations in Hong Kong: What lessons can be learnt from the United Kingdom and South Australia Author(s) Chen, Yuen Tung Eutonia (陳宛彤) Chen, Y. T. E. (2012). Regulating undercover agents’ operations and criminal investigations in Hong Kong: What lessons can be learnt Citation from the United Kingdom and South Australia (Outstanding Academic Papers by Students (OAPS)). Retrieved from City University of Hong Kong, CityU Institutional Repository. Issue Date 2012 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2031/6855 This work is protected by copyright. Reproduction or distribution of Rights the work in any format is prohibited without written permission of the copyright owner. Access is unrestricted. Page | 1 LW 4635 INDEPENDENT RESEARCH Topic: Regulating Undercover Agents’ Operations and Criminal Investigations in Hong Kong: What Lessons can be learnt from the United Kingdom and South Australia? Student Name: CHEN Yuen Tung Eutonia1 Date: 13th April 2012 Word Count: 9570 (excluding cover page, footnote and bibliography) Number of Pages: 39 Abstract It is not a dispute that undercover police officers have a proper role to play in contemporary law enforcement. However, there is no clear legislation in Hong Kong on the issue of whether the undercover agent is, at law, an offender of crime(s). This paper would examine the limitations of the prevailing undercover policing laws in Hong Kong and suggest possible recommendations. In particular, a comparative study of the United Kingdom and South Australia would be made to investigate whether Hong Kong should enact a legislation regulating undercover operations and criminal investigations.
    [Show full text]
  • The European, Middle Eastern and African Antitrust Review 2018
    The European, Middle Eastern and African Antitrust Review 2018 Published by Global Competition Review in association with AEQUO Law Firm FBC – Fischer Behar Chen Well Popovici Nit¸u Stoica & Asociat¸ii Baker Botts LLP Orion & Co Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP bpv Hügel Rechtsanwälte Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP Shearman & Sterling LLP Bruun & Hjejle Gide Loyrette Nouel Simonsen Vogt Wiig AS Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP Herbert Smith Freehills LLP SZA Schilling, Zutt & Anschütz Cooley Hogan Lovells Rechtsanwalts AG Covington & Burling LLP Kellerhals Carrard Vieira de Almeida & Associados DLA Piper Morgan Lewis & Bockius UK LLP Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP Dryllerakis & Associates Motieka & Audzevicˇius WilmerHale LLP ELIG, Attorneys-at-Law Norton Rose Fulbright LLP Fatur LLC Oppenländer Rechtsanwälte GCR www.globalcompetitionreview.com GLOBAL COMPETITION REVIEW Germany: Federal Cartel Office Andreas Mundt President Digitalisation and globalisation are triggering an enormous trans- important adjustments with regard to the notification of merger formation process that is challenging not only for the business com- cases that do not meet the established turnover thresholds. Cases munity but also for competition authorities, which have to deal with concerning the acquisition of companies that did not achieve high new markets, new players and new business models. The task of the turnovers in the past may also appear important in terms of their competition authorities is not changing, but the focus is. The Federal economic and competitive value for the purchaser. In those cases, Cartel Office is very well positioned to deal with this. the company’s economic potential can often be better expressed by One focus of our case work will be to keep markets open in the the purchase price.
    [Show full text]
  • DETAILED ASSESSMENT REPORT on ISRAEL ANTI-MONEY
    Strasbourg, 22 August 2008 MONEYVAL (2008) 01 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE EVALUATION OF ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING MEASURES AND THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM (MONEYVAL) DETAILED ASSESSMENT REPORT on ISRAEL 1 ANTI-MONEY LAUNDERING AND COMBATING THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM Memorandum prepared by the Secretariat Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs (DG-HL) 1 Adopted by the MONEYVAL Committee at its 27 th Plenary Session (Strasbourg, 7-11 July 2008). All rights reserved. Reproduction is authorised, provided the source is acknowledged, save where otherwise stated. For any use for commercial purposes, no part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system without prior permission in writing from the MONEYVAL Secretariat, Directorate General of Human Rights and Legal Affairs, Council of Europe (F-67075 Strasbourg or [email protected]). 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PREFACE.................................................................................................................................................... 7 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................................ 8 III. MUTUAL EVALUATION REPORT .................................................................................................... 15 1. GENERAL ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Regional Meeting: Stockholm, Sweden Outline: Emerging Issues in Ecommerce Competition, Distribution, Data and Platform Power
    3/22/19 Jay L. Himes 2019 Regional Meeting: Stockholm, Sweden Outline: Emerging Issues in Ecommerce Competition, Distribution, Data and Platform Power Online Platforms: A Blessing from Heaven or the Curse of the Devil? “The most innovative and valuable companies of our time are the leading ‘technology platform’ companies: Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Google – a group New York University Professor Scott Galloway simply labels ‘The Four.’ Except for Apple, none of these companies existed before 1990. That they have eclipsed in the public mind—in such a relatively short amount of time—such other tech giants as Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco and Intel is a testament to the remarkable acumen of the founders and leaders of The Four, their highly skilled workforces, and to the economy and society that have enabled them to flourish.” Robert Litan, A Scalpel, Not An Axe (Sept. 2018), https://www.progressivepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/ 2018/09/PPI_Antitrustand DataLaws_2018.pdf. “What was once a rich selection of blogs and websites has been compressed under the powerful weight of a few dominant platforms. These dominant platforms are able to lock in their position by creating barriers for competitors. They acquire startup challengers, buy up new innovations and hire the industry’s top talent. Add to this the competitive advantage that their user data gives them and we can expect the next 20 years to be far less innovative than the last.” Sir Tim Berners-Lee, Open Letter (Mar. 12, 2018), https://webfoundation.org/ 2018/03/web-birthday-29/. 1 3/22/19 Jay L. Himes 2019 Regional Meeting: Stockholm, Sweden Outline: Emerging Issues in Ecommerce Competition, Distribution, Data and Platform Power I.
    [Show full text]
  • COP List of Participants English V3
    Conference of the Parties INTERGOVERNMENTAL NEGOTIATING BODY ON A PROTOCOL ON ILLICIT TRADE IN TOBACCO PRODUCTS Fourth session FCTC/COP/INB-IT/4/DIV./1 Rev.2 Geneva, 14 - 21 March 2010 12 April 2010 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS REPRESENTATIVES OF PARTIES ARMENIA ALBANIA Delegate(s) Delegate(s) Dr A. Bazarchyan Coordinator, National Tobacco Control Programme, Ministry of Mr R. Shuperka Health National Coordinator, Tobacco Control, Institute of Public Health AUSTRALIA ALGERIA Chief delegate Chief delegate Mr S.B. Cotterell M. I. Jazaïry Assistant Secretary, Drug Strategy Branch, Department of Ambassadeur, Représentant permanent, Genève Health and Ageing Delegate(s) Alternate(s) M. M. Boukadoum Ms P.J. Marshall Conseiller, Mission permanente, Genève Director, Tobacco Control Section, Drug Strategy Branch, Department of Health and Ageing M. M.F. Bouchedoub Secrétaire, Mission permanente, Genève Mr S.S. Commar Minister-Counsellor (Health), Permanent Mission, Geneva M. F. Belkacemi Attaché, Mission permanente, Genève Ms E.M. Bowes Counsellor, Permanent Mission, Geneva Mr P. Higgins ANGOLA First Secretary, Permanent Mission, Geneva Chief delegate Ms K.M. Westmoreland Senior Legal Officer, Australian Government, Attorney-General's Mrs N.M. Saraiva Department Assistant, Health Issues, Permanent Mission , Geneva Delegate(s) Mlle L.S. Oliveira Zermatten Stagiaire, Mission Permanente, Genève AUSTRIA Delegate(s) Dr C. Babb-Schaefer Chief delegate Counsellor, Permanent Mission, Geneva Dr H. Heller Director, Federal Ministry of Finance BELARUS Deputy chief delegate Mr W. Pekel Chief delegate Public Prosecutor, Federal Ministry of Justice Mr M. Khvostov Alternate(s) Ambassador, Permanent Representative, Geneva Dr B. Blaha Delegate(s) Minister, Federal Ministry for European and International Affairs Mr A.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Draft
    - !"#$%&#"'$() *$!'"$#!*+$#, - !"#$%&'()&$*')&+!+',$)%)+,-!$*'../0!+', PROGRESS REPORT 2011 ENFORCEMENT OF THE OECD ANTI-BRIBERY CONVENTION www.transparency.org Transparency International (TI) is the global civil society organisation leading the fight against corruption. Through more than 90 chapters worldwide and an international secretariat in Berlin, TI raises awareness of the damaging effects of corruption and works with partners in government, business and civil society to develop and implement effective measures to tackle it. www.transparency.org ISBN: 978-3-935711-76-0 ©2011 Transparency International. All rights reserved. Printed on 100% recycled paper. Authors: Fritz Heimann, Gillian Dell and Kelly McCarthy © Cover photo: istockphoto/TommL Every effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the information contained in this report. All information was believed to be correct as of May 2011. Nevertheless, Transparency International cannot accept responsibility for the consequences of its use for other purposes or in other contexts. ! TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction 3 II. Organisation and Methodology 4 III. Major Findings, Conclusions & Recommendations 5 Table A: Foreign bribery enforcement in OECD Convention countries 8 Table B: Status of foreign bribery cases 9 IV. Findings on Specific Issues 10 Table C: Country performance on specific issues relating 13 to the enforcement of the Convention V. Reports on Enforcement in OECD Convention Countries 14 VI. Impact on Developing Countries – The Example of Nigeria 79 VII. Appendices A and B 86 A. List of National Expert Respondents 86 B. Questionnaire for Expert Respondents 88 ! Progress Report 2011: Enforcement of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention ! I. INTRODUCTION This is the seventh annual Progress Report on Enforcement of the OECD Convention prepared by Transparency International (TI), the global coalition against corruption.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Access Officer (For Publication)
    List of Access Officer (for Publication) - (Hong Kong Police Force) District (by District Council Contact Telephone Venue/Premise/FacilityAddress Post Title of Access Officer Contact Email Conact Fax Number Boundaries) Number Western District Headquarters No.280, Des Voeux Road Assistant Divisional Commander, 3660 6616 [email protected] 2858 9102 & Western Police Station West Administration, Western Division Sub-Divisional Commander, Peak Peak Police Station No.92, Peak Road 3660 9501 [email protected] 2849 4156 Sub-Division Central District Headquarters Chief Inspector, Administration, No.2, Chung Kong Road 3660 1106 [email protected] 2200 4511 & Central Police Station Central District Central District Police Service G/F, No.149, Queen's Road District Executive Officer, Central 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Central and Western Centre Central District Shop 347, 3/F, Shun Tak District Executive Officer, Central Shun Tak Centre NPO 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 Centre District 2/F, Chinachem Hollywood District Executive Officer, Central Central JPC Club House Centre, No.13, Hollywood 3660 1105 [email protected] 3660 1298 District Road POD, Western Garden, No.83, Police Community Relations Western JPC Club House 2546 9192 [email protected] 2915 2493 2nd Street Officer, Western District Police Headquarters - Certificate of No Criminal Conviction Office Building & Facilities Manager, - Licensing office Arsenal Street 2860 2171 [email protected] 2200 4329 Police Headquarters - Shroff Office - Central Traffic Prosecutions Enquiry Counter Hong Kong Island Regional Headquarters & Complaint Superintendent, Administration, Arsenal Street 2860 1007 [email protected] 2200 4430 Against Police Office (Report Hong Kong Island Room) Police Museum No.27, Coombe Road Force Curator 2849 8012 [email protected] 2849 4573 Inspector/Senior Inspector, EOD Range & Magazine MT.
    [Show full text]