DOCSLIB.ORG

Wildland/Urban Interface: Fire Department Wildfire Preparedness and Readiness Capabilities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Wildland/Urban Interface: Fire Department Wildfire Preparedness and Readiness Capabilities Wildland/Urban Interface: Fire Department Wildfire Preparedness and Readiness Capabilities Phase One Report Prepared by: Hylton Haynes, M.S. Angela Garcia, PhD. Rachel Madsen, NFPA Bentley University PhD. Candidate Brandeis University © November 2015 National Fire Protection Association Abstract Wildland and wildland/urban interface fires are a major problem in many parts of the country, and are increasing in frequency. These fires typically require more resources in terms of personnel and equipment than any one department has available, and so by their nature require cooperation and coordination between multiple departments, agencies, and organizations. Historically fire departments have focused primarily on fire suppression/control responsibilities, however increasingly the need for greater effort in wildfire risk reduction is becoming important. This report based on 46 fire chief and senior line officer interviews describes how some fire departments are addressing the wildfire peril and making the transition to becoming better prepared and ready to control and mitigate a wildfire incident in their communities. For some departments these conditions require only minor adjustments in their organization, procedures, and activities, while for other departments a major shift in outlook and approach may be required. Keywords: WUI, wildfire, wildland fire, wildland/urban interface, local fire departments, fire response, community risk reduction, fire apparatus, wildland fire training, wildfire dispatch protocols, personal protective equipment, preparedness, mitigation, Acknowledgments NFPA is grateful to the fire chiefs and senior line officers who participated in the interview process. There candid responses, enthusiasm for the topic and professionalism is greatly appreciated. A special thanks to the International Association of Fire Chiefs Wildland Fire Committee who helped facilitate the first 6 interviews of this study and Sarah McCaffrey, PhD., U.S. Forest Service for her assistance in the research study. The authors would also like to thank the members of NFPA staff who worked on this research study, including Albert Scott and Faith Berry for scheduling and conducting the interviews; and Emily Daly and Paula Levesque for transcribing the interviews; Richard Campbell, ScD. for assisting with the IRB application process and Christina Holcroft, ScD. in guiding the research process. For more information about the National Fire Protection Association, visit www.nfpa.org or call 617-770-3000. To learn more about the One-Stop Data Shop go to www.nfpa.org/osds or call 617-984-7451. Copies of this analysis are available from: National Fire Protection Association One-Stop Data Shop 1 Batterymarch Park Quincy, MA 02169-7471 www.nfpa.org e-mail: [email protected] phone: 617-984-7451 NFPA No. USS106 Copyright© 2015, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA Table of Contents Page Executive Summary iii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 Chapter 2: Equipment 8 Chapter 3: Training 43 Chapter 4: Communicating with the Public 56 Chapter 5: Community Risk Reduction 79 Chapter 6: Relationship Building and Cooperation 104 Chapter 7: Conclusion 116 Appendix A: Interview Survey Form 121 Appendix B: Interview Guide 125 WUI Fire Department Phase One Report 11/15 i NFPA Fire Analysis & Research, Quincy, MA List of Figures Page Figure 1. United States Census Regions 5 Figure 2. Percentage of fire departments interviewed that work that work with the following organizations/stakeholders and how these organization contribute to fire protection activities 9 Figure 3. Percentage of the departments interviewed that have mutual aid cooperative fire response agreements and do fire response mutual training like classroom and simulation exercises with other organizations 10 Figure 4. Percentage of the departments interviewed that devote more of their fire response time to either wildland fire or structural fire response 11 Figure 5. Percentage of fire departments interviewed that devote more of their time to either wildland fire or structural fire community risk reduction activities 79 Figure 6. Percentage of fire departments interviewed who have a wildfire Community risk reduction program that include the following programs/activities 84 WUI Fire Department Phase One Report 11/15 ii NFPA Fire Analysis & Research, Quincy, MA Executive Summary The purpose of this pilot study is to review and assess the current preparedness and readiness levels of local wildland/urban interface (WUI) fire departments that have experienced a significant wildfire event in recent years. Through this process we have captured some insights that are tantamount to “best management practices” because many of the fire department’s interviewed had WUI fire response and community risk reduction capabilities. To accomplish this research goal two research approaches were deployed. The first approach involved a pre-interview survey comprised of a set of closed-ended questions (see Appendix A). The research objective for this approach was to provide the interviewer an overall profile of the interviewee prior to the interview to help guide the semi-structured interview and to illicit close-end responses that would complement this qualitative study. The second research was a semi- structured interview that included a set of open-ended questions (see Appendix B). The qualitative component is the main research method of this study. Due to the volume of the data collected the project has been divided into two phases. In the first phase one only 25 of the 46 interviews were analyzed for the following themes – equipment (apparatus, PPE, radios), dispatch protocols, training, communicating with the public, community risk reduction and relationship building and cooperation and is only focused on the first 25 interviews: WUI/wildland fire equipment (apparatus, radios, PPE) There is considerable variation in perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of different types of apparatus. A number of departments seemed to be managing budgetary limitations by thoughtful choices about apparatus that could be used for a variety of different purposes (example: Type 3 ‘hybrid’ engine), and by strategic dispatching to maximize the effectiveness of resources they have. We did not find evidence for “one best” approach to dispatch protocols, rather the individual departments interviewed adequately developed protocols appropriate for local conditions. In terms of wildland/WUI fire PPE, we were impressed with the reported high rates of compliance, but feel that further study into the various factors that brought compliance rates below complete compliance is needed. Issues around timing of use, location of transitions in gear (i.e. changing from traditional bunker gear to wildland WUI Fire Department Phase One Report 11/15 iii NFPA Fire Analysis & Research, Quincy, MA fire gear), staffing and policies need to be further investigated to determine best ways to raise compliance rates. In terms of radio technology, there was evidence of broad awareness of the potential for communication problems due to incompatible radio systems or frequencies. It is clear from these data that while technology can ameliorate some of these problems, training and logistical issues will remain regardless of the technology used. For example, investing in multiple radio systems to provide more flexibility solved some problems but produced other problems for those who took this path. In short, there is no “one size fits all” solution to radio communications problems, since individual circumstances (such as geographical constraints, budgetary constraints, or the type and nature of relationships between units or agencies needing to communicate during incidents) will vary. Decisions about new radio equipment purchases should always be made in consultation with other agencies/departments that the department works with, in order to minimize potential radio incompatibilities and have a plan to deal with those that are inevitable. Further investigation into the merits of the Type 3 ‘hybrid’ engine and its application in the WUI and rural settings is warranted. Research should also investigate how widely adopted wildland chainsaw PPE is applied in practice and determine the scope of deficiency in field application. Training Several problems regarding Wildland and WUI Fire training have been identified. i. The first was the need to transition from traditional training practices which emphasized structural as opposed to Wildland/WUI fire training. ii. Second, Wildland/WUI fire training may be adopted inconsistently, with local and regional variations in the level and adequacy of training. iii. Fitness levels may not always be adequate to the rigors of Wildland/WUI fire events. Interviewees described a wide range of strategies to improve wildland/WUI fire training. Some departments were in states which had instituted state-wide systems, or took advantage of interagency simulations and drills to add wildland/WUI training, WUI Fire Department Phase One Report 11/15 iv NFPA Fire Analysis & Research, Quincy, MA added wildland/WUI training to refresher training programs or continuing education programs, conducted training needs assessments, encouraged personnel to participate in external complex wildland/WUI fire assignments, or created wildfire divisions and programs within their departments. Urban, rural and volunteer fire departments increasingly manage fire in the WUI. Wildland firefighter training, although separate from the traditional (structural)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • State-Of-Practice of Water Delivery Systems (Sprinklers) Used in the Wildland-Urban Interface
    [email protected] www.fpinnovations.ca STATE-OF-PRACTICE OF WATER DELIVERY SYSTEMS (SPRINKLERS) USED IN THE WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE COMPENDIUM FPInnovations April 2019 This compendium is not restricted. This is a compendium of reports published during the state-of-practice review of water delivery systems (sprinklers) in the wildland-urban interface (WUI). Funding for this review was provided by the Forest Resource Improvement Association of Alberta (FRIAA). Sprinklers are used to protect structures from wildfire during wildland-urban interface (WUI) events across Canada. Traditionally, standard forestry equipment has been used in conjunction with impact sprinklers. FPInnovations is reviewing common practices and equipment used during sprinkler deployments, in Canada, to determine if they are the most appropriate for community structure protection, or if alternative approaches should be considered. This compendium includes a literature review of the pathways to structure ignition, the results of a national survey on the use of sprinklers in Canada, a review of standards and codes specific to the WUI that relate to the use of sprinklers, the results of an equipment evaluation, a collection of WUI case studies and observations that describe actual sprinkler deployments, and a discussion on best practices and recommendations to enhance the effectiveness of sprinkler deployments. 301012735: FRIAA SPRINKLER PROJECT PRIMARY AUTHORS CONTACT INFORMATION Ray Ault COMPENDIUM Wilderness Fire Management Inc. (780) 658-2282 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide PMS 210 April 2013 Wildland Fire Incident Management Field Guide April 2013 PMS 210 Sponsored for NWCG publication by the NWCG Operations and Workforce Development Committee. Comments regarding the content of this product should be directed to the Operations and Workforce Development Committee, contact and other information about this committee is located on the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Questions and comments may also be emailed to [email protected]. This product is available electronically from the NWCG Web site at http://www.nwcg.gov. Previous editions: this product replaces PMS 410-1, Fireline Handbook, NWCG Handbook 3, March 2004. The National Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) has approved the contents of this product for the guidance of its member agencies and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone else. NWCG’s intent is to specifically identify all copyrighted content used in NWCG products. All other NWCG information is in the public domain. Use of public domain information, including copying, is permitted. Use of NWCG information within another document is permitted, if NWCG information is accurately credited to the NWCG. The NWCG logo may not be used except on NWCG-authorized information. “National Wildfire Coordinating Group,” “NWCG,” and the NWCG logo are trademarks of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names or trademarks in this product is for the information and convenience of the reader and does not constitute an endorsement by the National Wildfire Coordinating Group or its member agencies of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Draft of Committee Meeting Output
    WORKING DRAFT OF COMMITTEE MEETING OUTPUT CONTENT NOT FINAL –SUBJECT TO REVISION PRIOR TO LETTER BALLOT AND PUBLICATION OF FIRST DRAFT REPORT Document: NFPA 10 Revision Cycle: F2016 Meeting Date(s): April 21 – 23, 2015 Committee Activity: Input Stage This is a working draft, prepared by NFPA staff, to record the output generated at the Technical Committee’s First Draft Meeting. It includes draft copies of the First Revisions and any Global Revisions. It is being made available to Committee members for the purpose of facilitating early review, particularly for those Committee members who may be seeking input from their respective organizations in preparation for the Letter Ballot of the Committee. National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara... WORKING DRAFT OF COMMITTEE MEETING OUTPUT – Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers – NFPA 10, April 21 – 23, 2015; Subject to Revision – Not for Publicatio First Revision No. 51-NFPA 10-2015 [ Detail ] Add new annex material to 6.1.3.10 per attached. Supplemental Information File Name Description 10-FR51.docx New annex material. Submitter Information Verification Submitter Full Name: Barry Chase Organization: [ Not Specified ] Street Address: City: State: Zip: Submittal Date: Wed Apr 22 14:10:58 EDT 2015 ONLYPUBLICATION Committee Statement USE FOR Committee There is much misunderstanding in the field regarding the selection of extinguisher cabinets. NOT Statement: Providing explanatory material will help with- safety in the field. Response Message: Public Input No. 300-NFPA 10-2014 [New SectionCOMMITTEE after A.6.1.3.10.4] FOR REVISION TO SUBJECT 1 of 99 4/30/2015 12:39 PM WORKING DRAFT OF COMMITTEE MEETING OUTPUT – Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers – NFPA 10, April 21 – 23, 2015; A.6.1.3.10 Subject to Revision – Not for Publicatio In addition to providing storage, extinguisher cabinets provide protection for extinguishers and prevent accidental bumping.
    [Show full text]
  • The Village of Tequesta Fire Hydrants (Faqs)
    The Village of Tequesta Fire Hydrants (FAQs) Fire hydrants are designed to provide water for fire suppression purposes. Fire hydrants in the Village of Tequesta are owned and maintained by the Village of Tequesta Utility Department and are strategically placed to provide the best water protection available. Having a good water system allows the Village to have a better Insurance Services Office rating. ISO inspectors also review the accessibility, condition and maintenance of fire hydrants. The better the ISO rating we receive the better insurance rates that are available to homeowners. The State Fire Marshal per Florida Statute adopts the Florida Fire Prevention Code NFPA 1 every 3 years. Chapter 18.1 provides requirements for fire department access and water supply. Section 18.3.4.1 states, "Fire hydrants and connections or other approved water supplies shall be accessible to the Fire Department". These clearances prevent delays in finding and using fire hydrants and fire protection equipment. 3 Ft. 3 Ft. 3 Ft. Roadway Approach Clearance to Street A clear area for maneuvering equipment and firefighting apparatus must be maintained between the street and the front of the fire hydrants. Why is it important not to have obstructions around fire hydrants? Correct Clearance Incorrect Clearance Obstructed View When responding to a fire situation, we rely on strategically located fire hydrants to supply us with the water we need to help with extinguishing a fire. We must be able to locate these fire hydrants quickly. Therefore, they must be clearly visible to us and unobstructed by vehicles, fences, or vegetation. Can I paint the fire hydrant in front of my house? No.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Standard Firefighters Operational Category
    CLASSIFICATION STANDARD FIREFIGHTERS OPERATIONAL CATEGORY °Minister of Supply and Services Canada 1987 Firefighters CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 1 CATEGORY DEFINITION 3 GROUP DEFINITION 4 ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL DEFINITIONS 5 POINT RATING PLAN - FIRE CHIEFS 7 CLASSIFICATION PLAN - OTHER POSITIONS 12 1 Firefighters INTRODUCTION The classification standard describes the rating plans to be used to evaluate positions allocated to the Firefighters Group. It consists of an introduction, definition of the Operational Category and the occupational group, organizational level definitions, rating scales to be applied to Fire Chief and Detachment Fire Chief positions and the plan to be used to determine the level of other positions in the Firefighters Group. Point rating is an analytical, quantitative method of determining the relative values of jobs. Point-rating plans define characteristics or factors common to the jobs being evaluated, define degrees of each factor and allocate point values to each degree. This plan is the best method to evaluate jobs of Fire Chief and Detachment Fire Chief. The total value determined for each job is the sum of the point values assigned by the raters. All methods of job evaluation require the exercise of judgement and the orderly collection and analysis of information in order that consistent judgements can be made. The point-rating method facilitates rational discussion and resolution of differences in determining the relativity of positions. Factors Used to Evaluate Fire Chief and Detachment Fire Chief Positions The combined factors may not describe all aspects of jobs. They deal only with those characteristics that can be defined and distinguished and that are useful in determining the relative worth of jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management
    A publication of the National Wildfire Coordinating Group NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management PMS 902 April 2021 NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management April 2021 PMS 902 The NWCG Standards for Interagency Incident Business Management, assists participating agencies of the NWCG to constructively work together to provide effective execution of each agency’s incident business management program by establishing procedures for: • Uniform application of regulations on the use of human resources, including classification, payroll, commissary, injury compensation, and travel. • Acquisition of necessary equipment and supplies from appropriate sources in accordance with applicable procurement regulations. • Management and tracking of government property. • Financial coordination with the jurisdictional agency and maintenance of finance, property, procurement, and personnel records, and forms. • Use and coordination of incident business management functions as they relate to sharing of resources among federal, state, and local agencies, including the military. • Documentation and reporting of claims. • Documentation of costs and cost management practices. • Administrative processes for all-hazards incidents. Uniform application of interagency incident business management standards is critical to successful interagency fire operations. These standards must be kept current and made available to incident and agency personnel. Changes to these standards may be proposed by any agency for a variety of reasons: new law or regulation, legal interpretation or opinion, clarification of meaning, etc. If the proposed change is relevant to the other agencies, the proponent agency should first obtain national headquarters’ review and concurrence before forwarding to the NWCG Incident Business Committee (IBC). IBC will prepare draft NWCG amendments for all agencies to review before finalizing and distributing.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Fire Department Response Protocol and Consolidation Opportunities
    2010-2011 SANTA CLARA COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY REPORT FIGHTING FIRE OR FIGHTING CHANGE? RETHINKING FIRE DEPARTMENT RESPONSE PROTOCOL AND CONSOLIDATION OPPORTUNITIES Introduction With police and fire department expenses constituting the majority share of city budgets, the public may well wonder what public services will be left if these agencies remain entrenched in old service and old cost structures. Our communities are deeply rooted in public safety traditions. But particularly in light of the economic difficulties Santa Clara County (SCC) and its constituent cities face—both now and in the foreseeable future— taxpayers can no longer afford to fund the status quo. Therefore, and in light of complaints that it is common to see fire departments over-deploy multiple firefighting apparatus in response to non-life-threatening medical emergencies, seemingly a waste of taxpayer dollars, the Grand Jury focused its inquiry on exploring change in fire departments. Town and city managers (collectively CMs) and fire chiefs were interviewed to understand how changes to response protocol or various forms of consolidation had been considered to improve effectiveness and reduce cost. The Grand Jury found that, if considered at all, changes had not been implemented. However, CMs and fire chiefs generally agreed that fire department operations as currently configured are unsustainable. All agreed, in principle, that fire departments should rethink their response protocols—which are based on an historically fire-oriented model that does not match today’s overwhelmingly medical-based demand for emergency services. CMs and fire chiefs also agreed that opportunities for consolidation warrant a closer look, particularly since fire departments throughout the county deliver the same services in much the same ways.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Project Planning Information
    APPENDIX A Project Planning Information Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Plate A.7: 2009 listing of Firewise Accomplishments by Ponderosa Park Firewise Committee Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Plate 2.3.1: Wildfire Hazards Severity Form Checklist (Two Pages) - Assessment checklist sued to assess personal property risks Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Plate 2.3.2- One page Home assessment –Uses the same format as the form 1144 Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Appendix B Photos and Maps Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa Park – Community Wildfire Protection Plan Ponderosa
    [Show full text]
  • ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1128
    california legislature—2009–10 regular session ASSEMBLY BILL No. 1128 Introduced by Assembly Member Brownley February 27, 2009 An act to amend Sections 8589.11, 8589.12, 8589.13, 8589.14, 8589.15, 8589.16, 8589.17, 8589.18, 8589.19, 8589.20, 8589.21, and 8589.22 of, and to add Article 5.6 (commencing with Section 8589.25) to Chapter 7 of Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code, relating to emergency services, and making an appropriation therefor. legislative counsel’s digest AB 1128, as introduced, Brownley. Emergency services: fire engines. Existing law, the State Assistance for Fire Equipment Act, authorizes the California Emergency Management Agency to acquire new or used firefighting apparatus and equipment and to resell it to local agencies providing fire suppression services. This bill would require the Secretary of California Emergency Management to acquire 131 fire engines to augment its existing fleet and to assign the fire engines to governmental fire protection agencies in this state pursuant to a written agreement containing specified terms. This bill would allow a local agency, as defined, to donate its used fire engines in exchange for receiving a priority in assignment of the new fire engines acquired by the secretary, and require the secretary to make those donated fire engines available to a fire suppression agency that serves a rural area or community. This bill would make an appropriation by transferring specified funds from the Federal Trust Fund to the secretary for the purposes of these provisions, to the extent authorized under federal law. 99 AB 1128 — 2 — The bill would express the Legislature’s intent to create and fund an expenditure plan for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection to replace, augment, and upgrade its fire engine fleet and its emergency equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan
    Municipality of Anchorage Community Wildfire Protection Plan Municipality of Anchorage Community Wildfire Protection Plan Craig P. Goodrich, Fire Chief, Anchorage Fire Department by Susanne U. Rodman, MS, CF Forester, Anchorage Fire Department Anchorage, Alaska Joe Stam Stam’s Consulting, LLC Wasilla, Alaska Susanne U. Rodman is the forester for the Anchorage Fire Department. She works with public and private land owners to treat forest fuels to limit the spread and intensity of wildland fire. She has a B.S. and an M.S. in forestry while retaining the certified forester credential through the Society of American Foresters. Joseph C. Stam is a consultant for incident management with respect to all types of emergencies. Having served as the chief of fire and aviation for the State of Alaska Division of Forestry for eight years and as the incident commander for the Alaska Type I Team for seven years, Mr. Stam contributes significant skill and experience to all agency projects. Contributions to the Municipality of Anchorage Community Wildfire Protection Plan were made by Jennifer M. Klugh, Jason T. Kohler, Michelle Weston, Thomas G. Kempton, Bridget C. Bushue, Frank V. Cole, local residents and a host of agency staff from within and outside of Alaska. Jennifer M. Klugh serves the Anchorage Fire Department as the Firewise education specialist and supporting public information officer. She works with private residents to implement Firewise principles and leads the Wildfire Mitigation Office in education and outreach. Jason T. Kohler is the aviation manager and fuels specialist for the Anchorage Fire Department. His experience in wildland firefighting and helitack lends a high level of expertise and skill to the AFD Aviation Program.
    [Show full text]
  • GINIA Do Not Mark in This Box SECRETARY of STATE F"Ti L-- �="DL.- NATALIE E
    WEST VIRGINIA Do Not Mark In This Box SECRETARY OF STATE F"ti L-- �="DL.- NATALIE E. TENNANT ADMINISTRATIVE LAW DIVISION Form #6 NOTICE OF FINAL FILING AND ADOPTION OF A LEGISLATIVE RULE AUTHORIZED BY THE WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE AGENCY: State Fire Commission TITLE NUMBER: 87 AMENDMENT TO AN EXISTING RULE: YES ..1L NO _ _ S__ IF YES, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING AMENDED: _ "Volunteer Firefighters' Training, Equipment, and TITLE OF RULE BEING AMENDED: Operating Standards" IF NO, SERIES NUMBER OF RULE BEING PROPOSED:.---- TITLE OF RULE BEING PROPOSED:·---------------- THE ABOVE RULE HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE. AUTHORIZATION IS CITED IN (house or senate bill number) �S!..!.:B� 1�82:::...._________ _ __ ril 015 SECTION .....;6_4_-6_-2_____ __, PASSED ON Ap 3, 2 THIS RULE IS FILED WITH THE SECRETARY OF STATE. THIS RULE BECOMES EFFECTIVE ON THE FOLLOWING DATE: July 1, 2015 ' ����d¢ �G� ) Authorized Signature 87CSR8 TITLE 87 C'l1I L-- ED LEGISLATIVE RULE FIRE COMMISSION - Cj p 2: 4 2 SERIES 8 VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS' TRAINING, EQUIPMENT, AND OPERATING STANDARDS §87-8-1. General. 1.1. Scope. -- This rule establishes minimum training levels for rescue and fire fighting for volunteer fire departments; minimum levels of equipment needed to protect life and property within fire service areas for volunteer fire departments; minimum performance standards the volunteer departments must meet in response times, communications, levels of water flow and pressure; and other performance measures as considered necessary to meet the overall goals of improved fire prevention and control for volunteer fire departments. 1.2.
    [Show full text]
  • John E. Bunting, Secretary New Boston Fire Dept., NH
    Report of the Committee on William D. Walton, Nat'l Inst. of Standards and Technology, MD[RT] Forest and Rural Fire Protection (AlL to D. Madrzykowski) Louis A. Wltzeman, Scottsdale Fire Dept., AZ [U] (Alt. to L. G. Jekel) Richard E. Monmgue, Chair Eel A. Wristen, CA Dept. of Forestry & Fire Protection, CA [E] Incident Mgmt. Concepts, CA [SE] (Voting Alt. to CA/DFFP Rep.) John E. Bunting, Secretary Staff Liaison: James C. Smailey New Boston Fire Dept., NH [U] This list re~resents the membership at the time the Committee was Fred G. Alllnson, Nat'l Volunteer Fire Council, WA [U] balloted on the text of this edition. Since that time, changes in the Lynn R. Biddison, Chemonics Industries. Fire-Trol, NM [IM] membership may have occurred. A key to classifications is found at the Rep. Chemonics Industries, Inc. back of this document. Randall K. Bradley, Lawrence Livermore Nat'l Laboratory, CA [U] Mary D. Chambers, Bernalillo County Fire District 10, NM [U] Committee Scope: This Committee shall have primary Duane Dupor, Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources, WI [E] responsibility for documents on fire protection for rural, Donald C. Freyer, Georgia Forestry Commission, GA [U] suburban, forest, grass, brush, and tundra areas. This Louis G. Jekel, Rural/Metro Corp., AZ [U] Committee shall also have primary responsibility for documents on Roy A. Johnson, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, ID [El Class A foam and its utilization for all wildland and structural fire Ralph (Randy) Lafferty, MacMillan Bloedel Ltd, BG, Canada [M] fighting. This excludes f'Lxed fire protection systems.
    [Show full text]