DOCSLIB.ORG

Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan January 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan January 2019 San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority 2019 Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan January 2019 Prepared by: The 2019 Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan was funded in part under the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 (Proposition 1), administered by the State of California, Department of Water Resources. 2019 Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Table of Contents Final Table of Contents Chapter 1 Governance ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Regional Water Management Group ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 History of IRWM Planning ............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.3 Governance ................................................................................................................................... 1-5 1.4 Coordination ................................................................................................................................. 1-8 1.5 WSJ IRWMP Adoption, Interim Changes, and Future Updates .................................................. 1-11 Chapter 2 Region Description ................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 IRWM Regional Boundary ............................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Quality and Quantity of Water Resources .................................................................................. 2-15 2.3 Water Supplies and Demands ..................................................................................................... 2-26 2.4 Social and Cultural Makeup ........................................................................................................ 2-34 2.5 Climate Change Impacts ............................................................................................................. 2-40 2.6 Dependency on the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta .................................................................. 2-41 Chapter 3 Goals and Objectives .............................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Region’s Objectives ....................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Regional Priorities ......................................................................................................................... 3-9 Chapter 4 Resource Management Strategies ......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Climate Change Considerations for the Region ............................................................................ 4-5 4.2 Agricultural Water Use Efficiency ................................................................................................. 4-5 4.3 Urban Water Use Efficiency .......................................................................................................... 4-6 4.4 Conveyance – Delta ...................................................................................................................... 4-6 4.5 Conveyance – Regional/Local ....................................................................................................... 4-7 4.6 System Reoperation ...................................................................................................................... 4-7 4.7 Water Transfers ............................................................................................................................ 4-8 4.8 Conjunctive Management and Groundwater ............................................................................... 4-8 4.9 Desalination – Brackish and Seawater .......................................................................................... 4-9 4.10 Precipitation Enhancement ....................................................................................................... 4-9 4.11 Recycled Municipal Water ......................................................................................................... 4-9 4.12 Surface Storage – CALFED ........................................................................................................ 4-10 January 2019 i 2019 Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Table of Contents Final 4.13 Surface Storage – Regional/Local ............................................................................................ 4-10 4.14 Drinking Water Treatment and Distribution ............................................................................ 4-10 4.15 Groundwater and Aquifer Remediation .................................................................................. 4-10 4.16 Matching Quality to Use .......................................................................................................... 4-11 4.17 Pollution Prevention ................................................................................................................ 4-11 4.18 Salt and Salinity Management ................................................................................................. 4-11 4.19 Urban Runoff Management ..................................................................................................... 4-12 4.20 Agricultural Land Stewardship ................................................................................................. 4-12 4.21 Economic Incentives (Loans, Grants, and Water Pricing) ........................................................ 4-12 4.22 Ecosystem Restoration ............................................................................................................. 4-13 4.23 Forest Management ................................................................................................................. 4-13 4.24 Land Use Planning and Management ...................................................................................... 4-13 4.25 Recharge Area Protection ........................................................................................................ 4-13 4.26 Water-Dependent Recreation .................................................................................................. 4-14 4.27 Sediment Management ........................................................................................................... 4-14 4.28 Watershed Management ......................................................................................................... 4-14 4.29 Flood Management .................................................................................................................. 4-15 4.30 Water and Culture and Outreach and Engagement ................................................................ 4-15 4.31 Other Strategies ....................................................................................................................... 4-15 Chapter 5 Integration ............................................................................................................................. 5-1 Chapter 6 Project Solicitation and Prioritization .................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Project Solicitation and Review .................................................................................................... 6-1 6.2 Project Integration, Prioritization, and Project List Updates ........................................................ 6-3 6.3 Impacts and Benefits .................................................................................................................... 6-8 Chapter 7 Plan Performance and Monitoring ........................................................................................ 7-1 7.1 Project Monitoring ........................................................................................................................ 7-1 7.2 Plan Implementation Monitoring ................................................................................................. 7-2 7.3 Project Implementation to Date through IRWM Grant Program ................................................. 7-4 Chapter 8 Data Management ................................................................................................................. 8-1 8.1 Data Needs .................................................................................................................................... 8-1 8.2 Data Collection, Maintenance, and Dissemination....................................................................... 8-2 January 2019 ii 2019 Westside-San Joaquin Integrated Regional Water Management Plan Table of Contents Final Chapter 9 Financing ................................................................................................................................ 9-1 9.1 IRWM Planning Financing ............................................................................................................. 9-1 9.2 Project Financing ........................................................................................................................... 9-1 Chapter 10 Technical Analysis ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RK Ranch 5732 +/- Acres Los Banos, CA Merced County
    FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES RK Ranch 5732 +/- acres Los Banos, CA Merced County 707 Merchant Street | Suite 100 | Vacaville, CA 95688 707-455-4444 Office | 707-455-0455 Fax | californiaoutdoorproperties.com CalBRE# 01838294 FARMS | RANCHES | RECREATIONAL PROPERTIES | LAND | LUXURY ESTATES Introduction This expansive 5732 acre ranch is ideal for hunting, fishing, your favorite recreational activities, a family compound, agriculture, or cattle grazing. Located in Merced County, just an hour and a half from the San Francisco Bay Area, infinite recreational opportunities await with elk, trophy black tail deer, pigs, quail, and doves. The angler will be busy with catfish, bluegill, and outstanding bass fish- ing from the stock ponds. The South Fork of the Los Banos Creek flows through the property. This property is currently leased for cattle, but the recreational uses are only limited by your imagination. Location The property is located in Merced County, 17 miles from the town of Los Banos, 26 miles from Merced, and 8 miles from the San Luis Reservior. With all the benefits of seclusion, and the conveniences of major metropolitan areas close by, this property is just a 1.5 hour drive to Silicon Valley. Air service is provided by Fresno-Yosemite International Airport, 78 miles from the property, or Norman Y. Mi- neta San Jose International Airport, 83 miles from the property. Los Banos Municipal Airport is lo- cated 17 miles away. The closest schools would be 17 miles away in Los Banos. From the north, take Highway 101 South to CA-152 East, right onto Basalt Road, left onto Gonzaga Road.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Transmission Project Final Environmental Impact
    Appendix A Description of the Proposed Project and Alternatives San Luis Transmission Project 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AND ALTERNATIVES Chapter 2 Description of the Proposed Project and Alternatives This chapter describes the Proposed Project and alternatives; proposed construction, operation and maintenance, and decommissioning activities; and the Environmental Protection Measures (EPMs) and standard construction, operation, and maintenance practices that would be implemented as part of the Project. It also identifies the Environmentally Preferred Alternative. Pending completion of the EIS/EIR, the exact locations and quantities of project components (e.g., transmission line right-of-way, transmission line support structures, new substations or expanded substation areas, access roads, staging areas, pulling sites) are unknown and, in some cases, quantities of project components are estimated. This EIS/EIR uses the term Project area to collectively describe the area within which Project components could be located. A corridor is a linear area within which the easements (also known as rights-of-way) would be located; proposed corridors are part of the Project area. 2.1 Proposed Project Western proposes to construct, own, operate, and maintain about 95 miles of new transmission lines within easements ranging from 125 to 250 feet wide through Alameda, San Joaquin, Stanislaus, and Merced Counties along the foothills of the Diablo Range in the western San Joaquin Valley. Western also would upgrade or expand its existing substations, make the necessary arrangements to upgrade or expand existing PG&E substations, or construct new substations to accommodate the interconnections of these new transmission lines. An overview of the Proposed Project is illustrated in Figure 2-1.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Amendments to the 1994 Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins The Third Edition of the Basin Plan was adopted by the Central Valley Water Board on 9 December 1994, approved by the State Water Board on 16 February 1995 and approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 9 May 1995. The Fourth Edition of the Basin Plan was the 1998 reprint of the Third Edition incorporating amendments adopted and approved between 1994 and 1998. The Basin Plan is in a loose-leaf format to facilitate the addition of amendments. The Basin Plan can be kept up-to-date by inserting the pages that have been revised to include subsequent amendments. The date subsequent amendments are adopted by the Central Valley Water Board will appear at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, all pages will be dated 1 September 1998. Basin plan amendments adopted by the Regional Central Valley Water Board must be approved by the State Water Board and the Office of Administrative Law. If the amendment involves adopting or revising a standard which relates to surface waters it must also be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [40 CFR Section 131(c)].
    [Show full text]
  • CCID and Partners Pursue Los Banos Creek Detention Dam Project
    News aNd INformatIoN from the CeNtral CalIfornia IrrIgatIoN dIstrict • www.ccidwater.org • Issue three • 2012 WATER RESOURCE PLAN CCID and Partners Pursue Los Banos Creek Detention Dam Project ■ STUDY SHOWS PROMISE FOR NEW SURFACE STORAGE AND GROUNDWATER RECHARGE BENEFITS FROM BUREAU-OWNED FACILITY. new feasibility study is showing in the facility for use promise for a partnership and release in the Abetween local interests, CCID summer during peak and other members of the Exchange irrigation,” White said. Contractors, the San Luis Water “This partnership would District, Grasslands Water District and produce mutual benefits the City of Los Banos to utilize the for all entities involved.” Los Banos Creek Detention Dam for additional water supply benefits. In addition to enhancing surface water storage, A proposed plan to re-operate the the new plan would existing Bureau of Reclamation facility enhance the availability for additional surface water and recharge of groundwater for benefits into Los Banos Creek is being municipal and farming examined this year as a first piece of the water supplies by Los Banos Creek Water Resource Plan. recharging area aquifers CCID General Manager Chris White through releases to said the feasibility study has revealed Los Banos Creek. a very promising project with multiple Historical groundwater benefits for the local partners. studies with the City of Los Banos show The Los Banos Creek Water Resource that Los Banos Creek Plan could provide significant benefits including, among other things, is a primary recharge improved water supply reliability, source for the aquifer recharge of local runoff, groundwater that feeds consumer and agricultural wells table stability, recreational and THIS AERIAL VIEW SHOWS THE PARAMETERS OF THE PROPOSED in the area.
    [Show full text]
  • San Luis Reservoir State Recreation Area Final Resource Management Plan / General Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement
    2. Existing Conditions 2 Existing Conditions This chapter summarizes the existing land uses, resources, existing facilities, local and regional plans, socioeconomic setting, and visitor uses that will influence the management, operations, and visitor experiences at the Plan Area. This information will provide the baseline data for developing the goals and guidelines for the management policies of the Plan and will serve as the affected environment and environmental setting for the purpose of environmental review. 2.1 Land Use 2.1.1 Surrounding Land Uses / Regional Context The Plan Area is surrounded by a variety of land uses. Residential and commercial uses exist nearby in the unincorporated community of Santa Nella to the northeast of O’Neill Forebay. Lands to the southeast of the Plan Area between San Luis Reservoir and Los Banos Creek Reservoir include privately owned ranchlands, agricultural lands, an electrical substation, and scattered nonresidential uses. The San Joaquin Valley National Cemetery is northeast of O’Neill Forebay. Immediately west of San Luis Reservoir is Pacheco State Park, owned by CSP. DFW properties are located north of San Luis Reservoir and east of the O’Neill Forebay. The nearest incorporated cities are Los Banos, approximately 13 miles to the east; Gustine, approximately 18 miles to the north; and Gilroy, approximately 38 miles to the west. Santa Nella lies 2 miles to the northeast. Other nearby communities include Volta and Hollister. The Villages of Laguna San Luis, south of O’Neill Forebay and east of San Luis Reservoir, is an approved community plan that has not been constructed. Agua Fria is another planned community that could be developed south of and adjacent to the Villages of Laguna San Luis.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal in the Los Banos-Kettleman City Area, California Part 1. Changes in the Hydrologic Environment Conducive to Subsidence
    Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal in the Los Banos-Kettleman City Area, California Part 1. Changes in The Hydrologic Environment Conducive to Subsidence GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 437-E Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources Land Subsidence Due to Ground-Water Withdrawal in the Los Banos-Kettleman City Area, California Part 1. Changes in the Hydrologic Environment Conducive to Subsidence By WILLIAM B. BULL and RAYMOND E. MILLER STUDIES OF LAND SUBSIDENCE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER437-E Prepared in cooperation with the California Department of Water Resources A description of the ground-water reservoir and the great stress imposed on the aquifer system by mans mining of ground water UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFIC E , W ASH I N GTO N : 1 9 75 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Bull, William B. 1930- Land subsidence due to ground-water withdrawal in the Los Banos-Kettleman City area, California. (Studies of land subsidence) (Geological Survey Professional Paper 437-E-G) Pt. 2 by W. B. Bull; pt. 3 by W. B. Bull and J. F. Poland. Includes bibliographies and indexes. CONTENTS: pt. 1. Changes in the hydrologic environment conducive to subsidence. pt. 2. Subsidence and compaction of deposits, [etc.] Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:437-E 1. Subsidences (Earth movements) California San Joaquin Valley. 2. Aquifers California San Joaquin Valley. 3. Water, Underground California San Joaquin Valley. I. Miller, Raymond E. II. Poland, Joseph Fairfield, 1908- III.
    [Show full text]
  • WY06 Annual Data Report
    Water Year 2008 Pg 1 of 51 [The following continuous-record streamflow sites in California have been discontinued or converted to partial-record sites. Daily records were collected and are stored in NWIS, unless otherwise noted, for the period of record shown for each site. *, Revision published after station became inactive; a, Records available from the City of Los Angeles, Department of Water and Power] 09424050 Chemehuevi Wash Tributary near Needles 2.04 1960-62, 1966-68 09428530 Arch Creek near Earp 1.52 1961-71 09429010 Colorado River at Palo Verde Dam 186,200 1969-91 10250600 Wildrose Creek near Wildrose Station 23.5 1961-73, 1975 10250800 Darwin Creek near Darwin 173 1963-89 10251000 Big Dip Creek near Stovepipe Wells 0.95 1963-69 10251100 Salt Creek near Stovepipe Wells — 1974-88 10251350 Horsethief Creek near Tecopa 3.06 1961-70 10251375 Amargosa River at Dumont Dunes, near Death Valley 3,284 1999-2001 10252300 China Spring Creek near Mountain Pass 0.94 1961-72 10252330 Wheaton Wash near Mountain Pass 10.2 1965-68 10253080 Sunflower Wash near Essex 3.31 1963-70 10253320 Quail Wash near Joshua Tree 100 1964-71 10253350 Fortynine Palms Creek near Twentynine Palms 8.55 1963-71 10253540 Corn Springs Wash near Desert Center 24.1 1964-71 10253600 Eagle Creek at Eagle Mountain 7.71 1961-66 10254670 Alamo River at Drop 3, near Calipatria — 1979-2003 10255200 Myer Creek Tributary near Jacumba 0.11 1966-70 10255700 San Felipe Creek near Julian 89.2 1958-83 10255800 Coyote Creek near Borrego Springs 144 1951-83 10255805 Coyote Creek below Box Canyon, near Borrego Springs 154 1984-92 10255820 Yaqui Pass Wash near Borrego 0.04 1965-69 10255850 Vallecito Creek near Julian 39.7 1964-83 10255885 San Felipe Creek near Westmorland 1,693 1961-91 10256000 Whitewater River at White Water 57.5 1949-79 Pg 2 of 51 Water Year 2008 [The following continuous-record streamflow sites in California have been discontinued or converted to partial-record sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Candidate Dams for Assessing Environmental Flow Needs for Imperiled Species Conservation and Recovery
    Appendix S3. High-priority candidate dams for assessing environmental flow needs for imperiled species conservation and recovery Dams (n = 181) identified through screening process based on indicators of hydrologic alteration and potential to adversely affect imperiled flow-sensitive fish species (table S3.1). An additional 156 dams (table S3.2) with evidence of hydrological alteration occur in watersheds from which flow-sensitive species have been locally extirpated and may warrant environmental flows to support the recovery of imperiled fish populations. Table 3.1. High-priority candidate dams for assessing environmental flow needs for imperiled species conservation NID Name County River CA00454 Agnew Lake Mono Rush Creek CA00949 Albaugh No 2 Lassen Trib Willow Creek CA00731 Alisal Creek Santa Barbara Alisal Creek CA00204 Alpine Marin Lagunitas Creek CA00226 Anderson Cottonwood Shasta Sacramento River CA00964 Anthony House Nevada Deer Creek CA01412 Arundell Barranca Ventura Arundell Barranca CA00336 Balch Afterbay Fresno North Fork Kings River CA00665 Bean Hollow #2 (De Los Frijoles) San Mateo Arroyo De Los Frijoles CA00666 Bean Hollow #3 (De Los Frijoles) San Mateo Arroyo De Los Frijoles CA00757 Bear Valley San Bernardino Bear Creek CA00191 Big Tujunga No. 1 Los Angeles Big Tujunga Creek CA00601 Blodgett Sacramento Laguna Creek CA00207 Bon Tempe Marin Lagunitas Creek CA00088 Bouquet Canyon Los Angeles Bouquet Creek CA00245 Bowman Nevada Canyon Creek CA00802 Boxsprings Riverside Box Springs Creek CA10136 Bradbury Santa Barbara Santa
    [Show full text]
  • Los Banos Creek Diversion Project
    Draft FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Los Banos Creek Diversion Project FONSI-12-060 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation November 2014 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and manage the Nation’s natural resources and cultural heritage; provide scientific and other information about those resources; and honor its trust responsibilities or special commitments to American Indians, Alaska Natives, and affiliated island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION South-Central California Area Office, Fresno, California FONSI-12-060 Los Banos Creek Diversion Project _____________ Prepared by: Rain L. Emerson . Date Supervisory Natural Resources Specialist _____________ Concurred by: Shauna McDonald Date Wildlife Biologist _____________ Approved by: Michael Jackson, P.E. Date Area Manager FONSI-12-060 Introduction In accordance with section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as amended, the South-Central California Area Office of the Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) has determined that the proposed installation of infrastructure in Los Banos Creek and the Delta-Mendota Canal (DMC) for temporary diversion of flood water released from Los Banos Creek Detention Dam for beneficial use on riparian lands in Central California Irrigation District (CCID), Grasslands Water District (GWD), and San Luis Water District (SLWD) will significantly affect the quality of the human environment and an environmental impact statement is not required. This Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) is supported by Reclamation’s Environmental Assessment (EA)- 12-060, Los Banos Creek Diversion Project, and is hereby incorporated by reference.
    [Show full text]
  • General Range and Abundance
    Patterns of Distribution and Abundance of Breeding Colonial Waterbirds in the Interior of California, 2009–2012 1 November 2014 Report to: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wildlife Branch – Nongame Wildlife Program 1812 9th Street Sacramento, CA 95811 and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 8 Migratory Bird Program 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, CA 95825 W. David Shuford Point Blue Conservation Science 3820 Cypress Drive # 11 Petaluma, CA 94954 Author contact information: W. David Shuford Point Blue Conservation Science 3820 Cypress Drive #11 Petaluma, CA 94954 [email protected] www.pointblue.org Cover photo: Multi-species colony, dominated by American White Pelicans (Pelecanus erythrorhynchos) and Ring- billed and California gulls (Larus delawarensis and L. californicus), on a large rocky islet in the east lobe of Clear Lake National Wildlife Refuge, Modoc County, California. Photo, 18 May 2009, by the author. Recommended citation: Shuford, W. D. 2014. Patterns of distribution and abundance of breeding colonial waterbirds in the interior of California, 2009–2012. A report of Point Blue Conservation Science to California Department of Fish and Wildlife and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Region 8). Available at www.fws.gov/mountain- prairie/species/birds/western_colonial/. CONTENTS Acknowledgments…………………………………………………………………………………v Executive Summary…………………………………………………………………………….…1 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………………..3 Study Area and Methods…………………………………………………………………………..4 Background and Overall Approach…………………………………………………….….4
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission Seattlenwf
    THE FISHES OF THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN BASIN, WITH A STUDY OF THEIR DISTRffiUTION AND -VARIATION· By CLOUDSLEY RUTTER BUREAU OF FISHERIES DOCUMENT NO. 637 103 Blank page retained for pagination THE FISHES OF THE SACRAMENTO-SAN JOAQUIN BASINt.WITH A STUDY OF THEIR DISTRffiUTION AND VARIATION. By CLOUDSLEY RUTTER.a The following report embodies the results of studies conducted incidentally to an investigation of the natural history of the young salmon. The primary object was to determine the distribution of the various species of fishes found in the Sacramento­ San Joaquin basin, but the identification of the species necessitated a study of their variations, which has proved of equal interest. The determinations are based on large collections made in 1898 and 1899 by the author with Mr. Fred M. Chamber­ lain, of the Bureau of Fisheries, Mr. N. B. Scofield, ichthyologist of the California Fish Commission, and Mr. W. S. Atkinson, a student at Stanford University, as associates. The report includes notes on the geography of the basin, with a synopsis of the streams in which collections were made; a review of the various papers in which other collections from this region have been recorded; a key to the species known to inhabit the basin; detailed discussion of the variations and the local distribution of the native species; a list of the anadromous species; and a list of the species that have been introduced. GEOGRAPHY OF THE BASIN. The great central basin of California, drained by the Sacramento and SanJoaquin rivers, has for its eastern rim.the Sierra Nevada and for its western the coast ranges.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Assessment of the San Joaquin-Tulare Basins, California
    Water Quality Assessment of the San Joaquin–Tulare Basins, California: Analysis of Available Data on Nutrients and Suspended Sediment in Surface Water, 1972–1990 By Charles R. Kratzer and Jennifer L. Shelton U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1587 National Water-Quality Assessment Program 1998 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas J. Casadevall, Acting Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publications Date Kratzer, Charles R. Water-quality assessment of the San Joaquin–Tulare Basins, California:Analysis of available data on nutrients and suspended sediment in surface water, 1972–1990 / by Charles R. Kratzer and Jennifer L. Shelton. p. c.m. — (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper ; 1587) Includes bibliographical references (p. ). 1. Nutrient pollution of water—California—San Joaquin River Watershed. 2. Suspended sediments— Environmental aspects—California—San Joaquin River Watershed. 3. Nutrient pollution of water— California—Tulare Lake Watershed. 4. Suspended sediments—Environmental aspects—California— Tulare Lake Watershed. I. Shelton, Jennifer L. II. National Water-Quality Assessment Program (U.S. ) III. Title. IV. Series. TD427.N87K73 1998 363. 739’42’098948—dc21 97-48536 CIP ISBN 0-607-88707-9 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey • Improve understanding of the primary (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the natural and human factors that affect earth resources of the Nation and to provide informa- water-quality conditions.
    [Show full text]