DOCSLIB.ORG

Oo BELLSOUTH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Oo BELLSOUTH ACCEPTED Oo BELLSOUTH FOR BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Patrick W. Turner PROCESSING Legal Department General Counsehgth Capone 1600 Wilhams Street o Suite 5200 803 401 2900 Columbia, SC 29201 Fax 803 254 17~3 t Vl patrickturnertpbeilsouth.corn April 12, 20 t'A SION - 2021 May The Honorable Bruce Duke Executive Director 20 Public Service Commission of SC 2:00 Post Office Drawer 11649 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 PM - Re: Petition for Arbitration of US LEC of South Carolina Inc. Of an Amendment to SCPSC an Interconnection Agreement with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Pursuant to Section 252(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended - 2004-78-C Petition of US LEC of South Carolina Inc. to Resolve Dispute with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. on Change of Law Provisions to the Interconnection Agreement Docket 2004-78-C - Page Dear Mr. Duke: Enclosed for filing are the original and fifteen 1 copies of BellSouth of Inc.'s Inc.'s Telecommunications, Response to US LEC of South Carolina Petition for 118 Arbitration in the above-referenced matter. By copy of this letter, I am serving this response on all parties of record as reflected by the attached Certificate of Service. Sincerely, 7jtttrml, Patrick W. Turner PWT/nml Enclosures cc: Parties of Record PC Docs ¹ 534736 ACCEPTED BEFORE FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF D +QC J~ SOUTH CAROLINA PROCESSING In Re: ) ) Petition for Arbitration ofUS LEC of South Carolina Inc. ) o Of an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement with ) O G Inc. Docket No 2004:78-Cm BellSouth Telecommunications, Pursuant to ) - 2021 Section 252(b) ofthe Communications Act of 1934, ) ', I! as Amended ) co ) May Petition of US LEC of South Carolina Inc. to Resolve ) uJ 20 Dispute with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. on ) Change of Law Provisions to the Interconnection ) 2:00 Agreement ) PM - SCPSC BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.'S RESPONSE TO US LEC OF SOUTH CAROLINA INC.'S PETITION FOR ARBITRATION - 2004-78-C Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. II 252(b)(3), BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. ("BellSouth"), responds to the Petition for Arbitration ("Petition") filed by US LEC of South Carolina Inc. ("US LEC") and says: - Page Sections 251 and 252 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 ("1996 Act") encourage 2 negotiations between parties to reach local interconnection agreements. Section 251(c)(l) of the of 118 1996 Act requires incumbent local exchange companies to negotiate the particular terms and conditions of agreements to fulfill the duties described in Sections 251(b) and 251(c)(2)-(6). As part of the negotiation process, the 1996 Act allows a party to petition a state commission for arbitration of unresolved issues.'he petition must identify the issues resulting Iiom the negotiations that are resolved, as well as those that are unresolved.'he petitioning '7 U.S.C. $ 252(b)(2). See generally, 47 U.S.C. /II 252 (b)(2)(A) and 252 (b)(4). ACCEPTED must submit along with its petition "all relevant documentation concerning: (1) the party FOR unresolved issues; (2) the position of each of the parties with respect to those issues; and (3) any PROCESSING other issues discussed and resolved by the parties.'* A non-petitioning party to a negotiation under this section may respond to the other party's petition and provide such additional information as it wishes within 25 days after a commission receives the petition. The 1996 Act - 2021 limits a commission's consideration of any petition (and any response thereto) to the unresolved May issues set forth in the petition and in the response. 20 Through the arbitration process, a commission must resolve the unresolved issues 2:00 ensuring that the requirements of Sections 251 and 252 ofthe 1996 Act are met. The obligations PM - contained in those sections of the 1996 Act are the obligations that form the basis for negotiation, SCPSC and if negotiations are unsuccessful, then form the basis for arbitration. Issues or topics not - specifically related to these areas are outside the scope of an arbitration proceeding. Once a 2004-78-C commission has provided guidance on the unresolved issues, the parties must incorporate those resolutions into a final agreement to be submitted to a commission for - approval.'ellSouth Page and US LEC previously entered into an Interconnection Agreement ("Prior 3 Agreement") in South Carolina that expired on December 31, 2003. Instead ofnegotiating a new of 118 agreement, US LEC chose to adopt another carrier's agreement pursuant to Section 252(i) of the 1996 Act. However, because the Federal Communication Commission's ("FCC") Triennial Review Order ("TRO") materially altered the terms and conditions of Attachment 2 in the 47 U.S.C. $ 252(b)(2). 47 U.S.C. $ 252(b)(3). 47 U.S.C. $ 252(b)(4). 47 U.S.C. $ 252(a). ACCEPTED agreement to be adopted, BellSouth requested that the parties negotiate a new Attachment 2 for FOR said agreement, which would be included in US LEC's new agreement ("New Agreement"). PROCESSING The parties have engaged in good faith negotiations in this regard as they have reduced the number of disputed items from 28 to 13. Notwithstanding these good faith efforts, they have been unable to reach agreement on all of the issues related to Attachment 2. As a result, US LEC - 2021 filed this Petition pursuant to the 1996 Act. Because the Prior Agreement has expired and May because US LEC raised this matter pursuant to Section 252(b) of the 1996 Act, US LEC's 20 alternative request for relief pursuant to the Change in Law provision in the Prior Agreement is 2:00 irrelevant and not necessary to resolve the instant matter. PM BellSouth LEC's - hereby responds to each of the separately numbered paragraphs of US SCPSC Petition: - I. THE PARTIES AND CONTACT INFORMATION 2004-78-C 1. BellSouth admits the allegations ofParagraph 1 of Section I ofthe Petition. 2. The allegations in Paragraph 2 of Section I of the Petition require no response - Page &om BellSouth. 4 3. The allegations in Paragraph 3 of Section I of the Petition require no response of 118 iiom BellSouth. 4. BellSouth admits the allegations set forth in the first sentence of Paragraph 4 of Section I of the Petition. BellSouth admits that its South Carolina headquarters of5ces are located at 1600 Williams Street, Columbia, South Carolina 20201 and denies the remainder of the allegations set forth in the second sentence ofParagraph 4 of Section I ofthe Petition. ACCEPTED 5. BellSouth denies the allegations in Paragraph 5 of Section I of the Petition, except FOR to admit that all correspondence, notices, inquiries and orders regarding this Petition should be PROCESSING directed to the undersigned. II. STATEMENT OF FACTS 6. BellSouth denies Paragraph 6 of Section II, except to admit that, on or about - 2021 October 8, 2003, BellSouth received a request from US LEC to amend the Prior Agreement to May implement the TRO. 20 7. BellSouth admits Paragraph 7 of Section II ofthe Petition. 2:00 8. BellSouth admits Paragraph 8 of Section II ofthe Petition. PM - 9. BellSouth denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 9 of Section II of the SCPSC Petition, except to admit that BellSouth rejected US LEC's proposed TRO Amendment and - advised US LEC on November 5, 2003 that BellSouth will present a new Attachment 2 to reflect 2004-78-C the changes and modifications that were necessary as a result ofthe TRO. 10. BellSouth denies the allegations contained in Paragraph 10 of Section II of the - Page Petition, except to admit that BellSouth provided a template agreement for Attachment 2 on 5 December 12, 2003 and that the parties have been negotiating from this template. of 118 11. BellSouth admits the allegations ofParagraph 11 of Section II of the Petition. 12. BellSouth admits the allegations of Paragraph 12 of the Section II of the Petition and states that BellSouth has negotiated in good faith with US LEC regarding Attachment 2 and the TRO. The parties have continued to negotiate and exchange redlines of the Attachment 2 template since the filing of this Petition. The current resolved and unresolved provisions of Attachment 2 are accurately reflected in Exhibit A attached hereto. ACCEPTED 13. BellSouth denies the allegations of Paragraph 13 of Section II of the Petition, FOR except to admit that the Prior Agreement expired on December 31, 2003 and that US LEC has PROCESSING previously requested to adopt the agreements of other carriers. 14. BellSouth denies the allegations of Paragraph 14 of Section II of the Petition, except to admit that US LEC requested a negotiation session on March 4, 2004 — only three (1) - 2021 days after submitting its redlined version of Attachment 2 to BellSouth; (2) the D.C. Court of May Appeals issued its decision in USTA v. FCC No. 000-00012 (D.C. Circuit, Mar. 2, 2004) 20 ("USTA II") on March 2, 2004; and (3) BellSouth requested that negotiations be postponed until 2:00 the parties had time to consider the effect of D.C. Circuit's decision in USTA II on Attachment PM - SCPSC 15. BellSouth denies Paragraph 15 of Section II of the Petition, except to admit that - US LEC attached Exhibits A and B to its Petition. These exhibits do not accurately reflect the 2004-78-C current status of the parties'egotiations. III. JURISDICTION - Page 16. The referenced provisions of the 1996 Act speak for themselves and require no 6 response Irom BellSouth. BellSouth agrees with US LEC's calculations regarding the deadline of 118 for filing the Petition and for a decision by the Commission. BellSouth, however, denies any remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 16 of Section III.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HTTP Cookie - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia 14/05/2014
    HTTP cookie - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 14/05/2014 Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search HTTP cookie From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Navigation A cookie, also known as an HTTP cookie, web cookie, or browser HTTP Main page cookie, is a small piece of data sent from a website and stored in a Persistence · Compression · HTTPS · Contents user's web browser while the user is browsing that website. Every time Request methods Featured content the user loads the website, the browser sends the cookie back to the OPTIONS · GET · HEAD · POST · PUT · Current events server to notify the website of the user's previous activity.[1] Cookies DELETE · TRACE · CONNECT · PATCH · Random article Donate to Wikipedia were designed to be a reliable mechanism for websites to remember Header fields Wikimedia Shop stateful information (such as items in a shopping cart) or to record the Cookie · ETag · Location · HTTP referer · DNT user's browsing activity (including clicking particular buttons, logging in, · X-Forwarded-For · Interaction or recording which pages were visited by the user as far back as months Status codes or years ago). 301 Moved Permanently · 302 Found · Help 303 See Other · 403 Forbidden · About Wikipedia Although cookies cannot carry viruses, and cannot install malware on 404 Not Found · [2] Community portal the host computer, tracking cookies and especially third-party v · t · e · Recent changes tracking cookies are commonly used as ways to compile long-term Contact page records of individuals' browsing histories—a potential privacy concern that prompted European[3] and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Carter Standing Firm Against Water Projects WASHINGTON (U PI)-President And, in a Reference to the Cutbacks Carter Also Mentioned His New Session Closed to Reporters
    The weather Cloudy with chance of afternoon Inside today showers. High near 70. Clearing, windy and cooler tonight. Lows 38 to 4). Area news Editorial ........ 4A Friday partly sunny and cool. Highs in ............1-2-3-4-B Family....... 8-9-A mid to upper 50s. Probablility of Classified . 8-9-10-B Obituaries ... 12-A precipitation 30 per cent today and 10 Comics........ 11-B Sports........0-7-8-B per cent tonight and Friday. Weather Dear Abby ... 11-B map on page 9-B. Secw, No. m PRICKt HnM EN CK«TS Carter standing firm against water projects WASHINGTON (U PI)-President And, in a reference to the cutbacks Carter also mentioned his new session closed to reporters. Carter today told a group of House he has proposed in federal spending energy program and said “it’s dif­ It was one of a series of meetings Democrats there is a big for water and dam projects, he said, ficult to please all the groups.” Carter plans to hold with con­ “inflationary difference” in the level “I think we ought to quit wasting gressional leaders to set a timetable of farm price supports and the money on unnecessary water He then took questions from the for priority legislation before he minimum wage he favors and the projects.” congressmen for about an hour in a leaves for London next month. amounts advocated in Congress. Carter also told the group, assembled in the state dining room of the White House, “I think we ought to quit wasting our money on un­ necessary water projects.” United States, Cuba 2 The President has proposed farm I ■ ' price supports much lower than those sought by farm groups and some members of Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Oo BELLSOUTH
    ACCEPTED Oo BELLSOUTH FOR BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Patrick W. Turner PROCESSING Legal Department General Counsehgth Capone 1600 Wilhams Street o Suite 5200 803 401 2900 Columbia, SC 29201 Fax 803 254 17~3 t Vl patrickturnertpbeilsouth.corn April 12, 20 t'A SION - 2019 September The Honorable Bruce Duke Executive Director Public Service Commission of SC Post Office Drawer 11649 27 Columbia, South Carolina 29211 10:14 Re: Petition for Arbitration of US LEC of South Carolina Inc. Of an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. Pursuant AM to Section 252(b) of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended - SCPSC Petition of US LEC of South Carolina Inc. to Resolve Dispute with BellSouth Telecommunications, Inc. on Change of Law Provisions to the Interconnection Agreement - Docket 2004-78-C 2004-78-C Dear Mr. Duke: Enclosed for filing are the original and fifteen copies of BellSouth - Page Telecommunications, Inc.'s Response to US LEC of South Carolina Inc.'s Petition for Arbitration in the above-referenced matter. 1 of By copy of this letter, I am serving this response on all parties of record as reflected 118 by the attached Certificate of Service. Sincerely, 7jtttrml, Patrick W. Turner PWT/nml Enclosures cc: Parties of Record PC Docs ¹ 534736 ACCEPTED BEFORE FOR THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF D +QC J~ SOUTH CAROLINA PROCESSING In Re: ) ) Petition for Arbitration ofUS LEC of South Carolina Inc. ) o Of an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement with ) O G Inc. Docket No 2004:78-Cm BellSouth Telecommunications, Pursuant to ) - 2019 Section 252(b) ofthe Communications Act of 1934, ) ', I! as Amended ) co ) September Petition of US LEC of South Carolina Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • UI Design and Interaction Guide for Windows Phone 7
    UI Design and Interaction Guide 7 for Windows Phone 7 July 2010 Version 2.0 UI Design and Interaction Guide for Windows Phone 7 July 2010 Version 2.0 This is pre-release documentation and is subject to change in future releases. This document supports a preliminary release of a software product that may be changed substantially prior to final commercial release. This docu- ment is provided for informational purposes only and Microsoft makes no warranties, either express or implied, in this document. Information in this document, including URL and other Internet Web site references, is subject to change without notice. The entire risk of the use or the results from the use of this document remains with the user. Unless otherwise noted, the companies, organizations, products, domain names, e-mail addresses, logos, people, places, and events depicted in examples herein are fictitious. No association with any real company, organization, product, domain name, e-mail address, logo, person, place, or event is intended or should be inferred. Complying with all applicable copyright laws is the responsibility of the user. Without limiting the rights under copyright, no part of this document may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), or for any purpose, without the express written permission of Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft may have patents, patent applications, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property rights covering subject matter in this docu- ment. Except as expressly provided in any written license agreement from Microsoft, the furnishing of this document does not give you any license to these patents, trademarks, copyrights, or other intellectual property.
    [Show full text]
  • Use Your PC for Music
    WINDOWS® GUIDE Use Your PC for Music IN THIS GUIDE Rip and Burn CDs Page 2 Play Music Page 10 Connect an MP3 Player Page 14 Use a Music Service Page 17 What You’ll Need n Windows Media® Player—available as a free download n Recordable or rewritable audio or data CDs n A CD Burner n A Windows Media-enabled media device, such as a Windows Mobile® device or Zune® n A computer running Windows Vista® Windows Guides is a library of easy-to-use guides that show you how to get more from your Windows experience. Share these guides with your friends and family. © 2008 Microsoft. All rights reserved. WINDOWS GUIDE Use Your PC for Music Rip and Burn CDs Nowadays, most of us don’t just own a handful of albums. Music is a way of life. We want to be able to buy, organize and play songs on a whim, and take them with us wherever we go. Well, Windows Media Player takes the work out of building and maintaining a music library, so your only worry is what to listen to first. RIP A CD Ripping, or encoding, your impressive CD library into a digital one with Windows Media Player is quick and simple. There are two things to consider before ripping a CD: n By default, ripped songs are stored as Windows Media Audio (WMA) files. WMA is the best format to use for playing on Windows Media Player, but if for some reason you’d like to choose a different format: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Town Will Hire Outside Traffic Expert
    Vittntb Serving Westfield, Scotch Plains and Fanwood Friday, October 17, 2003 50 cents INSIDE Turning on the lights Town will hire outside traffic expert Edwards & Kelcey is part of developer HKT Nassau's design Consultant team selected by the town to draw up plans for the redevelopment of South Avenue and Prospect and will oversee Elm streets. To date, the developer has sub- mitted schematic plans proposing developer's the development of the South Avenue site with 18,000 square feet of retail space and 73 apart- traffic study ments. The Prospect and Elm •ySTEVIHU streets site would have 17 resi- dential units and 3,000 square Mike Walker hauled In this pass THE RECORD-PRESS feet of retail space. from Dan LaForge (or a 27-yard WESTFIELD — The Town Additionally, parking decks at touchdown during Scotch Plains Council voted at its meeting the South Avenue and the 33-22 victory over Crantord last Tuesday to retain Edwards & Prospect and Elm streets sites week. The Raiders Improved to 4-0 GEORGE PACCHSU-O/STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER Kelcey, traffic engineers who are would hnve 1,106 and 491 park- mi will look to remain undefeated ChlWrtn play on • giant slide during tha "Light* on Afttrachool" program at tlM WattflaM YMCA. part of the downtown developer's ing spaces respectively. Saturday when they host Irvingtm design team, and to hire an out- As the Town Council continues For the story see Sports, Page C-1. side third-party consultant to to consider the shape and scope of oversee the traffic study for the YMCA event emphasizes the downtown redevelopment project.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking the Metro with Windows Phone
    1 Taking the Metro with Windows Phone WHAT ’ S IN THIS CHAPTER ➤ How Windows Phone has changed Microsoft ’ s approach to the mobile industry ➤ What the Metro Design Language is and how it came about ➤ An overview of the Start and Lock Screens and how they help users access information on the phone ➤ Why the use of Hubs creates a more connected user experience ➤ What it means to be a Windows Phone developer Microsoft has been building mobile devices for well over 10 years, starting with a variety of Windows CE- based devices, such as the Handheld PC and the Palm- size PC, fi rst released in 1996. Beginning around 2000, these disparate operating systems began converging into what became Windows Mobile, based on the principle of delivering a PC to your pocket. New features were predominately driven by enterprise needs such as device management and security. This eventuallyCOPYRIGHTED worked to the detriment ofMATERIAL the platform as it didn’ t appeal to the average consumer. Devices were more robust than sexy, and the user interface mirrored that of the desktop, even having a Start menu, rather than providing an experience. Throughout this chapter, and in other parts of this book, there will be references to both Windows Mobile and Windows Phone . This is intentional, and they are not the same thing. Windows Mobile refers to the previous mobile operating system from Microsoft that at the time of writing is Windows Mobile 6.5.3. Windows Phone refers to Microsoft ’ s latest offering in the mobile space and starts with Windows Phone 7.
    [Show full text]
  • NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDR0-31 CATCHMENT
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS HYDR0-31 CATCHMENT MODELING AND INITIAL PARAMETER ESTIMATION FOR THE NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE RIVER FORECAST SYSTEM Eugene L. Peck Office of Hydrology Washington., D. C. June 1976 UNITED STATES /NATIONAL OCEANIC AND / National Weather DEPARTMENT OF. COMMERCE ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION Service Elliot L. Richardson, Secretary Robert M. White, Administrator George P. Cressman. Director The programs listed herein are furnished with the express understanding that the United States Govern­ ment gives no warranties, express or implied, con­ cerning the accuracy, completeness, reliability, usability, or suitability for any particular purpose of the information and data contained in these programs or furnished in connection therewith, and the United States shall be under no liability whatsoever to any person by reason of any use made thereof. The programs herein belong to the Government. Therefore, the recipient further agrees not to assert any proprietary rights therein or to represent these programs to anyone as other than Government programs. ii Preface The enclosed papers were prepared for the International Symposium and Workshop on the Application of Mathematical Models in Hydrology and Water Resources Systems held in Bratislava, Czechoslovakia, on 8-13 September 1975. The papers are being published in this format because the distribution of the original reports was extremely limited. There is a need for this information to be available to potential users of the catchment model of the National Weather Service River Forecast System. This system comprises a number of hydrologic models which are being incorporated into an operational river forecasting program. The system is being implemented by the Hydrologic Services Division and the Hydrologic Research Laboratory of the Office of Hydrology.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
    Exhibit 52.1 Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC ,QWKH0DWWHURI $SSOLFDWLRQVRI&RPFDVW&RUSRUDWLRQ 0%'RFNHW1R *HQHUDO(OHFWULF&RPSDQ\ DQG1%&8QLYHUVDO,QF )RU&RQVHQWWR$VVLJQ/LFHQVHVDQG 7UDQVIHU&RQWURORI/LFHQVHHV ANNUAL REPORT OF COMPLIANCE WITH TRANSACTION CONDITIONS Comcast Corporation NBCUniversal Media,LLC 1HZ-HUVH\$YHQXH1: 6XLWH :DVKLQJWRQ'& )HEUXDU\ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page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³%,$6´ 3URYLVLRQRI6WDQGDORQH%,$6 9LVLEO\2IIHUDQG$FWLYHO\0DUNHW5HWDLO6WDQGDORQH%,$6 %,$6$QQXDO5HSRUW ( 2WKHU%,$6&RQGLWLRQV 6SHFLDOL]HG6HUYLFH5HTXLUHPHQWV 0ESV2IIHULQJ ) ³6SHFLDOL]HG6HUYLFH´RQ&RPFDVW6HW7RS%R[HV ³67%V´ * 8QIDLU3UDFWLFHV 9 127,&(2)&21',7,216 9, 5(3/$&(0(172)35,25&21',7,216 9,, &200(5&,$/$5%,75$7,215(0('< 9,,, 02',),&$7,21727+($$$58/(6)25$5%,75$7,21 ,; %52$'&$67&21',7,216 ; ',9(56,7<&21',7,216 7HOHPXQGR0XOWLFDVW&KDQQHO 7HOHPXQGRDQGPXQ3URJUDPPLQJRQ&RPFDVW2Q'HPDQG
    [Show full text]
  • Why Software Firms Build Hardware – and What Microsoft Is Doing About It
    Why Software Firms Build Hardware – And What Microsoft Is Doing About It by Ryan M. Shaffer B.S. Electrical Engineering Grove City College, 2008 M.S. Computer Science Boston University, 2011 SUBMITTED TO THE SYSTEM DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAM IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FEBRUARY 2015 © Ryan M. Shaffer. All rights reserved. The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Signature of Author: _____________________________________________________ System Design and Management Program January 9, 2015 Certified by: ____________________________________________________________ Michael Cusumano Sloan Management Review Professor in Management Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: ___________________________________________________________ Patrick Hale Director, System Design and Management Fellows Program Why Software Firms Build Hardware – And What Microsoft Is Doing About It by Ryan M. Shaffer Submitted to the System Design and Management Program on January 9, 2015 in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Engineering and Management ABSTRACT Many software companies build first-party hardware products due to the trend toward smaller, more highly-integrated devices, along with the fast pace of innovation in the technology industry. Building hardware products does not always lead to success and actually creates a financial risk for the company by significantly reducing profit margins as compared to the traditional profit margins to which large software companies are accustomed. Three specific strategies are observed which firms have used successfully in this area.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft—Kinect for Windows
    Microsoft—Xbox Live, Games for Windows Live, Zune, and Windows Phone Marketplace Consumer Demand for Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION SUPPLEMENTARY PROCEDURES FOR CONSUMER-RELATED DISPUTES Instructions for filing an arbitration claim: 1. Please fill out this form and keep a copy for your records. 2. Mail two (2) copies of this form and your check or money order to the nearest American Arbitration Association Case Management Center. Please consult Section C-8 of the AAA Supplementary Procedures for Consumer-Related Disputes for the required fee. You can find the AAA rules, the nearest Case Management Center, and the fee at www.adr.org or by calling the AAA at (800) 778-7879. Please make your check or money order payable to the American Arbitration Association. 3. Mail a copy of this form and a copy of your check or money order to Microsoft Corporation, LCA Arbitration, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399. Upon receipt, Microsoft will reimburse you for your filing fee if your claim is for $75,000 or less. 4. Please include the attached copies of the Terms of Use for Xbox Live, Games for Windows Live, Zune, and Windows Phone Marketplace with each copy of this form you mail. Your Information: Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail address: Gamertag Zune tag (if Zune at issue) Windows Live ID Disputes involving $10,000 or less are usually resolved by the submission of documents. If a hearing is held, it will usually be telephonic. In disputes involving more than $10,000, a telephonic or in-person hearing will be held.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft—Kinect for Windows
    Microsoft Software, Devices, and Services with Arbitration Agreements Consumer Demand for Arbitration before the American Arbitration Association Instructions for filing an arbitration claim with American Arbitration Association: 1. Please fill out this form and keep a copy for your records. 2. Mail a copy of this form and your check or money order for $200 to American Arbitration Association, Case Filing Services, 1101 Laurel Oak Road, Suite 100, Voorhees, NJ 08043. Make your check or money order payable to American Arbitration Association. Please consult the AAA Consumer Arbitration Rules for more information. You can find them at www.adr.org or by calling the AAA at (800) 778-7879. 3. Please copy (or download and print) and mail to AAA (with this form and your check) your agreement with an arbitration clause (for example, Microsoft Services Agreement, Xbox Live Terms of Use, Xbox One Limited Warranty, Microsoft Software License Agreement Windows 8, Nokia Limited Warranty, etc.). If you don’t have your agreement, you can find most at www.microsoft.com/about/legal/en/us/arbitration/default.aspx 4. Mail a copy of this form, a copy of your Microsoft agreement, and a copy of your check or money order to Microsoft Corporation, LCA Arbitration, One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA 98052-6399. Upon receipt, Microsoft will reimburse you for your $200 filing fee if your claim is for $75,000 or less. Your Information: Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: E-mail address: Gamertag (for Xbox) Zune tag (for Zune) Microsoft account (was Windows Live ID) Disputes involving $25,000 or less are usually resolved by the submission of documents.
    [Show full text]