Radioactive Waste Management 2010 2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Radioactive Waste Management 2010 2010 Radioactive Waste Management 2010 2010 Partnering for Long-term Management of Radioactive Waste Partnering for Long-term National radioactive waste management programmes are in various phases of siting facilities and rely on distinct technical approaches for different categories of waste. In all cases, it is necessary for institutional actors and the potential or actual host community to build a meaningful, workable relationship. Partnership Partnering for Long-term Management of Radioactive Waste Management of Radioactive approaches are effective in achieving a balance between the requirements of fair representation and competent participation. With host community support, they also help ensure the desirable combination of a licensable site and management concept as well as a balance between compensation, local control Waste and development opportunities. This report provides up-to-date information on experience with local partnership arrangements in 13 countries. The characteristics, advantages and aims of community partnerships are also described in addition to the concept's evolution over the past decade. Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries Belgian partnerships General assembly Executive committee (local members + (local members + implementer) implementer) Local partners Project Politicians and administrators coordinators Social, cultural and environmental organisations Trades people, farmers, unions, etc. Working groups ZZZQHDIU (66 2010 02 1 P) € 45 -:HSTCQE=U]X[^V: ISBN 978-92-64-08369-1 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY Radioactive Waste Management Partnering for Long-term Management of Radioactive Waste Evolution and Current Practice in Thirteen Countries © OECD 2010 NEA No. 6823 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 30 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1st February 1958 under the name of the OEEC European Nuclear Energy Agency. It received its present designation on 20th April 1972, when Japan became its first non-European full member. NEA membership today consists of 28 OECD member countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The Commission of the European Communities also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: – to assist its member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co- operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as – to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. Publié en français sous le titre : Partenariats pour la gestion à long terme des déchets radioactifs Évolution et pratique actuelle dans treize pays NEA n° 6824 Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found on line at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. © OECD 2010 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) [email protected]. FOREWORD The Forum on Stakeholder Confidence (FSC) was created in 2000 under a mandate from the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency’s Radioactive Waste Management Committee to facilitate the sharing of international experience in addressing the societal dimension of radioactive waste management (RWM). It explores means of ensuring an effective dialogue amongst all stakeholders and considers ways to strengthen confidence in decision-making processes. The FSC has documented a wealth of experience through topical sessions and studies, and in particular through its national workshops and community visits. Summaries and proceedings are available online at www.nea.fr/html/rwm/fsc/. In 2004, the Forum synthesised countries’ experience of relationship-building in the report Learning and Adapting to Societal Requirements for Radioactive Waste Management. Partnership approaches were cited as effective in achieving a balance between the requirements of fair representation and competent participation. They were also found to contribute to the desirable combination of a licensable site and management concept with host community support. Finally, partnership arrangements help ensure a balance between compensation, local control and development opportunities. Elements of the partnership approach have been incorporated into the RWM strategy of most OECD countries. Such an approach to decision making, to jointly own both the problem and the solution, is increasingly implemented with success worldwide. This report documents how the approach to partnering has been or is being implemented in 13 countries, namely: Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Hungary, Japan, Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States. In this context, it should be mentioned that the waste management programmes considered in the report are at very different stages and actual experience in implementation reflects participatory measures during the stage of designing the siting procedure or first siting steps. It is to be expected that within the coming years there will be growing experience as well as application to the full waste management cycle. This publication may aid future assessments of subsequent evolution and progress and can be consulted now for ideas and insights into transversal findings. Acknowledgements This publication is based on a study prepared in 2007 by the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) which reviewed the partnership approach in ten countries. The NDA gracefully accepted the FSC proposal to augment and disseminate its study. Special thanks are due to Dr. E. Atherton, an FSC member from the United Kingdom and the NDA Head of Stakeholder and Community Engagement for Radioactive Waste Management. Prof. A. Vári and Dr. C. Pescatore augmented the original “Overview and transversal findings” with an analysis of the last decade of progress. These materials were reviewed and adopted by the FSC members. The latter contributed the texts on their own country experiences. Ms. C. Mays served as the editor of the present text, aided by Ms. K. Sazama and Ms. M.-L. Peyrat. Ms. W. Sabbah assured the French translation. 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Overview and transversal findings .................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Regeltillämpning På Kommunal Nivå Undersökning Av Sveriges Kommuner 2020
    Regeltillämpning på kommunal nivå Undersökning av Sveriges kommuner 2020 Kalmar län Handläggningstid i veckor (Serveringstillstånd) Kommun Handläggningstid 2020 Handläggningstid 2016 Serveringstillstånd Borgholm 3 7 Kalmar 3 3 Hultsfred 4 5 Högsby 4 5 Emmaboda 6 8 Medelvärde Nybro 6 8 handläggningstid 2020 Torsås 6 6 Sverige: 5,7 veckor Vimmerby 6 Gruppen: 5,7 veckor Västervik 6 6 Medelvärde Mönsterås 8 6 handläggningstid 2016 Mörbylånga 8 5 Sverige: 6,0 veckor Oskarshamn 8 8 Gruppen: 6,1 veckor Handläggningstid i veckor (Bygglov) Kommun Handläggningstid 2020 Handläggningstid 2016 Bygglov Högsby 1 4 Nybro 1 4 Kalmar 2 2 Borgholm 4 3 Västervik 4 4 Medelvärde Emmaboda 5 8 handläggningstid 2020 Oskarshamn 5 5 Sverige: 4,0 veckor Mönsterås 6 5 Gruppen: 3,8 veckor Torsås 6 5 Medelvärde Hultsfred 5 handläggningstid 2016 Mörbylånga 3 Sverige: 4,0 veckor Vimmerby 5 Gruppen: 4,4 veckor Servicegaranti (Bygglov) Servicegaranti Dagar Digitaliserings- Servicegaranti Dagar Kommun Bygglov 2020 2020 grad 2020 2016 2016 Borgholm Nej 0,5 Ja Emmaboda Nej 0,5 Nej Hultsfred Nej Högsby Ja 42 0 Ja 42 Servicegaranti 2020 Kalmar Ja 28 1 Ja 28 Sverige: 19 % Ja Mönsterås Nej 1 Ja 28 Gruppen: 33 % Ja Mörbylånga Nej Digitaliseringsgrad 2020 Nybro Nej 0 Sverige: 0,52 Oskarshamn Ja 35 0 Nej Gruppen: 0,5 Torsås Nej 0,5 Nej Servicegaranti 2016 Vimmerby Nej Sverige: 30 % Ja Västervik Nej 1 Nej Gruppen: 36 % Ja Tillståndsavgifter (Serveringstillstånd) Kommun Tillståndsavgift 2020 Tillståndsavgift 2016 Serveringstillstånd Mönsterås 6 000 6 000 Oskarshamn 7 600 7 600 Hultsfred
    [Show full text]
  • Hultsfred Högsby Mönsterås Nybro Oskarshamn
    544800 549800 554800 559800 564800 569800 574800 579800 15°45'0"E 15°50'0"E 15°55'0"E 16°0'0"E 16°5'0"E 16°10'0"E 16°15'0"E 16°20'0"E Lillesjövägen Skiren GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-009 Product N.: 03Ruda, v1 F i Saxtorp n n s j e ö g v L n ä ä Ruda - SWEDEN v i e V l g g ö l e j e ä t v e F l s s ö n i a e sj n n l j Finsjöväg s Flood - 07/07/2012 d il ö L lle en jö v i v a L ille L ä v ä s g Reference Map - Overview ä e g jö n g e v e ä n g Production date: 11/07/2012 n e L n ille sj ö N v " ä 0 g ' 0 e 2 n ° 0 0 7 5 0 L 0 9 9 N " 4 n il 4 0 l ' 5 e L e 5 0 3 g s 3 2 il ° 6 ä l j illesjö 6 7 e ö L v v äge 5 n s v ö j j ä s ö g v le e il ä n L g e L n ill L esjöv i äg l en l Mörlunda e s Lillesjövägen j ö ägen v Lillesjöv ä n g ge e ä n v sjö le Lil Lillesjövägen n e Lillesjövägen Li äg lle öv sj sj öv ille äg L Hultsfred en Lillesjövägen Oskarshamn 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 4 4 Cartographic Information 3 3 6 6 1:60,000 Full color ISO A1, medium resolution (200 dpi) Lillesjövägen n Å e 0 1.25 2.5 5 s g vä ä km ge v ö n j n Finsjö s e Lillesjövägen vä n F g g i ins Map Coordinate System: WGS 1984 UTM Zone 33N vä en jövägen en ö F väg sj Finsjö le Lil Graticule: WGS 84 geographical coordinates il lesjö ± L väg en Lillesjövägen en jöväg Bockara Fins en Legend Åsvä väg Emån gen Ås General Information Transportation Artificial Area N " 0 ' 5 Area of Interest Primary Road Built-Up Area 1 ° 7 5 N " Secondary Road Hydrology 0 ' District of City 5 n 1 ° e 7 5 g Water Bodies 0 0 0 ä 0 Local Road 9 v 9 4 ö 4 j 4 s 4 3 3 n 6 i 6 Other Point of
    [Show full text]
  • Tätorter 2000 MI0810
    STATISTISKA CENTRALBYRÅN 1(138) Tätorter 2000 MI0810 Innehåll SCBDOK 3.0 0 Allmänna uppgifter 1 Innehållsöversikt 0.1 Ämnesområde 1.1 Observationsstorheter 0.2 Statistikområde 1.2 Statistiska målstorheter 0.3 Statistikprodukten ingår i Sveriges 1.3 Utflöden: statistik och mikrodata officiella statistik 1.4 Dokumentation och metadata 0.4 Ansvarig 0.5 Producent 0.6 Uppgiftsskyldighet 0.7 Sekretess och regler för behandling av personuppgifter 0.8 Gallringsföreskrifter 0.9 EU-reglering 0.10 Syfte och historik 0.11 Statistikanvändning 0.12 Uppläggning och genomförande 0.13 Planerade förändringar i kommande undersökningar 2 Uppgiftsinsamling 3 Slutliga Observationsregister 2.1 Ram och ramförfarande 3.1 Produktionsversioner 2.2 Urvalsförfarande 3.2 Arkiveringsversioner 2.3 Mätinstrument 3.3 Erfarenheter från senaste 2.4 Insamlingsförfarande undersökningsomgången 2.5 Databeredning 4 Statistisk bearbetning och redovisning 5 Databehandlingssystem (*) 4.1 Skattningar: antaganden och 5.1 Systemöversikt och systemflöde beräkningsformler 5.2 Bearbetningar 4.2 Redovisningsförfaranden 5.3 Databasmodell 5.4 Databastabeller och övriga datamängder 5.5 Databastillbehör 5.6 Rapporter 5.7 Säkerhetsrutiner 6 Loggbok (*) (*) Avsnitt 5 och 6 är endast avsedda för internt bruk. Saknar innehåll i denna version av SCBDOK. SCBDOKMI0810_2000 04-04-26 09.50 STATISTISKA CENTRALBYRÅN 2(138) 0 Allmänna uppgifter 0.1 Ämnesområde Miljö resp. Befolkning 0.2 Statistikområde Markanvändning resp. Befolkningens sammansättning 0.3 Statistikprodukten ingår i Sveriges officiella statistik Uppgifter om tätorternas areal och befolkning ingår i Sveriges officiella statistik. 0.4 Ansvarig Myndighet/organisation: SCB Avdelningen för miljö- och regionalstatistik / Regional planering och naturresurshushållning Kontaktperson: Marianne Eriksson Telefon: 08-50694736 Telefax: 08-50694348 e-post: [email protected] 0.5 Producent Se ansvarig.
    [Show full text]
  • Misterhultsbygden
    VÅR LANDSBYGD I FOKUS. Hela Sverige Ska Leva Oskarshamn 2018:1 INNEHÅLLSFÖRTECKNING Vår landsbygd i fokus. ...................................................................................................................................... 4 Fokusfrågor. ....................................................................................................................................................... 6 Boende ............................................................................................................................................................ 6 Cykelvägar ...................................................................................................................................................... 7 Service ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Bockarabygden. .................................................................................................................................................. 9 Prioriterade aktiviteter & frågor till kommunen. ..................................................................................... 9 Bockara – Övriga pågående aktiviteter ...................................................................................................... 9 Möckhult - Övriga pågående aktiviteter .................................................................................................. 10 Bockara - Kommande aktiviteter ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ESPON PROFECY Annex 16. Case Study Report. Vimmerby (Sweden)
    PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe (Inner Peripheries: National territories facing challenges of access to basic services of general interest) Applied Research Final Report Annex 16 Case Study Report Vimmerby (Sweden) Version 07/12/2017 This Applied Research Project is conducted within the framework of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme, partly financed by the European Regional Development Fund. The ESPON EGTC is the Single Beneficiary of the ESPON 2020 Cooperation Programme. The Single Operation within the programme is implemented by the ESPON EGTC and co-financed by the European Regional Development Fund, the EU Member States and the Partner States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland. This delivery does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the members of the ESPON 2020 Monitoring Committee. Authors Anna Berlina, Gunnar Lindberg and John Moodie - Nordregio (Sweden) Advisory Group Project Support Team: Barbara Acreman and Zaira Piazza (Italy), Eedi Sepp (Estonia), Zsolt Szokolai, European Commission. ESPON EGTC: Marjan van Herwijnen (Project Expert), Laurent Frideres (HoU E&O), Ilona Raugze (Director), Piera Petruzzi (Outreach), Johannes Kiersch (Financial Expert). Information on ESPON and its projects can be found on www.espon.eu. The web site provides the possibility to download and examine the most recent documents produced by finalised and ongoing ESPON projects. This delivery exists only in an electronic version. © ESPON, 2017 Printing, reproduction or quotation is authorised provided the source is acknowledged and a copy is forwarded to the ESPON EGTC in Luxembourg. Contact: [email protected] a PROFECY – Processes, Features and Cycles of Inner Peripheries in Europe ESPON 2020 i Table of contents Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16
    Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Technical Report TR-01-16 Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 ISSN 1404-0344 Graphium Norstedts Tryckeri, 2001 gggggg Feasibility Studies – Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Älvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB June 2001 2 Preface Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Com- pany), SKB, has carried out feasibility studies on a municipal scale as a part of the siting programme for the deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Final reports describing the results of the six feasibility studies in Östhammar, Nyköping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Älv- karleby and Hultsfred were submitted during the autumn and winter of 2000/2001. With this as a basis, the siting work can now proceed to the next phase – site investigations. In this stage, investigations that include test drilling will be conducted on at least two sites. In December 2000, SKB published the report “Integrated account of method, site selec- tion and programme prior to the site investigation phase,” in which SKB stipulates where they want to conduct site investigations and how they will be carried out. The report is being reviewed by the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate during the first half of 2001. Before the site investigations can be initiated, the go-ahead is required from the national safety authorities, the Government, and concerned municipalities and landowners.
    [Show full text]
  • Eksjö Hultsfred Vetlanda Vimmerby Area of Interest Detail 1 Area Of
    520000 525000 530000 535000 540000 545000 550000 X 555000 15°20'0"E 15°22'30"E 15°25'0"E 15°27'30"E 15°30'0"E 15°32'30"E 15°35'0"E 15°37'30"E 15°40'0"E 15°42'30"E 15°45'0"E 15°47'30"E 15°50'0"E 15°52'30"E 15°55'0"E 15°57'30"E X GLIDE number: N/A Activation ID: EMSR-009 Product N.: 01Mariannelund, v2 0 S 0 i v 0 K l e 0 0 a rv 0 0 s äg 0 9 å e 9 3 s n 3 T Mariannelund - SWEDEN 6 6 r o ö l gla l Flood - 07/07/2012 H nd e sle g de a Delineation Map - Overview n ta n Production date: 13/07/2012 Riksväg INGATORP 40 S t o R g r X iksvä X 40 gatan N " 0 3 ' X 7 3 ° N X R " 2 7 0 i 5 3 3 ' k 7 ; s 3 Ydrevägen 3 ° v 7 4 ä 5 Riksväg 40 g X Skruven Riksväg 40 X X B ör Ny se g Ny bo å va Fagersjön 0 r lla Area of Interest 0 0 0 d MARIANNELUND 0 0 5 s 5 v 8 Länsväg 8 3 ä 3 6 g Detail 1 6 e 129 n Kolsgöl Vimmerby STOREBRO Eksjö B Länsväg a c 129 k sjöv Krön g ä gen a N t " a 0 ' n 5 3 ° N 7 " 5 0 ' 5 3 Cartographic Information ° 7 5 Öd ehu B l t 1:60000 Full color ISO A1, low resolution (100 dpi) er S gh o a lm x e m RADARSAT-2 0 1,25 2,5 5 åa l Ingatorpssjön km v.
    [Show full text]
  • Förstudie Oskarshamn
    R-00-37 Förstudie Oskarshamn Markanvändning och miljöaspekter Fördjupad studie av prioriterade områden Lars Birgersson, Sara Södergren Kemakta Konsult AB Rumar Carlsson C-son Consult Anna Gustafsson Hushållningssällskapet i Stockholms och Uppsala län Lennart Holmberg Metria GIS-centrum Oktober 2000 Svensk Kärnbränslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 ISSN 1402-3091 SKB Rapport R-00-37 Förstudie Oskarshamn Markanvändning och miljöaspekter Fördjupad studie av prioriterade områden Lars Birgersson, Sara Södergren Kemakta Konsult AB Rumar Carlsson C-son Consult Anna Gustafsson Hushållningssällskapet i Stockholms och Uppsala län Lennart Holmberg Metria GIS-centrum Oktober 2000 Denna rapport har gjorts på uppdrag av SKB. Slutsatser och framförda åsikter i rapporten är författarens(nas) egna och behöver nödvändigtvis inte sammanfalla med SKB:s. Sammanfattning Sammanställning av skyddade och värdefulla områden samt miljösituationen inom hela Oskarshamns kommun har tidigare redovisats inom förstudiearbetet. Resultaten från denna fördjupade studie av de två prioriterade områdena från den preliminära slut- rapporten visar att de generella omdömen som tidigare gjordes, vad gäller en lokalisering av djupförvaret ur mark- och miljösynpunkt, kvarstår även då mer detaljerad information beaktas. Detta indikerar att den information som insamlats i kommunskala är tillräcklig för att översiktligt bedöma ett områdes lämplighet ur mark- och miljösynpunkt. Denna fördjupade studie har i huvudsak varit inriktad på insamling och redovisning av kartmaterial. Resultaten från studien utgör ett viktigt, men inte tillräckligt, underlag för att peka ut lämpliga platser för driftområde 2, ventilationsbyggnader och eventuella nya vägsträckningar inom de prioriterade områdena.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Studies - Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Alvkarleby
    SE0100208 Technical Report TR-01-16 Feasibility Studies - Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Hultsfred and Alvkarleby Summary Report Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB June 2001 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +46 8 661 57 19 S 9 I 4 S PLEASE BE AWARE THAT ALL OF THE MISSING PAGES IN THIS DOCUMENT WERE ORIGINALLY BLANK Preface Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Com- pany), SKB, has carried out feasibility studies on a municipal scale as a part of the siting programme for the deep repository for spent nuclear fuel. Final reports describing the results of the six feasibility studies in Osthammar, Nykoping, Oskarshamn, Tierp, Alv- karleby and Hultsfred were submitted during the autumn and winter of 2000/2001. With this as a basis, the siting work can now proceed to the next phase - site investigations. In this stage, investigations that include test drilling will be conducted on at least two sites. In December 2000, SKB published the report "Integrated account of method, site selec- tion and programme prior to the site investigation phase," in which SKB stipulates where they want to conduct site investigations and how they will be carried out. The report is being reviewed by the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate during the first half of 2001. Before the site investigations can be initiated, the go-ahead is required from the national safety authorities, the Government, and concerned municipalities and landowners. SKB projects that the it will be possible to commence the site investigations in 2002.
    [Show full text]
  • Events Guide Archipelago Guide Outdoor Guide Municipality Guide Bathing Guide City Tour Excursions Guide Flea Markets & Anti
    GUIDE NOTE! USE THIS GUIDE TOGETHER WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MAP 2020 Events Guide Archipelago Guide Outdoor Guide Municipality Guide Bathing Guide City Tour Excursions Guide Flea Markets & Antiques Guide With reservation for typographical errors and changed conditions after printing. Always double check the information. VASTERVIK.COM 1 EVENTS/MUSIC VisFestivalen, 9−11 July Durspelsstämman i Ankarsrum, 24−26 July Löga Beach Party, 25 July Hamnplan Live, 1 August Diggiloo, 2 August Grande Finale After work, 28 August OUTDOOR/ADVENTURE Karhu Run, 6 July Loftahammar Endurance Day, 1 August Västervik Triathlon, 8 August SPORT Speedway, elitserien (May−Sept) Tjust 2-dagars, 30 June–1 July Västervik Junior Open, 29−30 July Swedish Floorball Open, 31 July−1 August CULTURE/OTHER Konstrundan, 25 April Västerviks konstförening Sommarsalong, 27 June − 27 July Hasselörodden, 15 July Move Me, Movie Night, week 29 Welcome to the archipelago Sagobyn, Gamleby, 22 August Garpedagen, Gamleby, 23 August and the summer city of Västervik Sportbilsdagen, 5 September WHEN IN VÄSTERVIK, the sea is just around the corner. Enjoy the summery and salty smells and just listen to the wooden boats chugging their way into the fishing port. Enjoy bathing from the rocks, just 300 metres from the town centre. During the summer, exciting events are arranged such as festivals, markets and concerts throughout the entire municipality. Västervik is the largest urban area in the municipality, a small and charming city with cobbled streets, squares and alleys. In Västervik, you ’ll also find a variety of exciting shops. There is a large selection of exquisite restaurants and relaxing coffee bars.
    [Show full text]
  • Bilaga Underlag Till Riktlinjer För Bostadsförsörjning 2020-2028
    Bilaga Underlag till Riktlinjer för bostadsförsörjning 2020-2028 Nybro kommun 1 Antaget av kommunfullmäktige 2020-04-15 Diarienummer: KS-2018-365 Oskars hembygdsgård. Foto: Kalmar läns museum NATIONELLT OCH REGIONALT PERPSEKTIV PÅ BOSTADSMARKNADEN BOSTADSMARKNADEN I RIKET BOSTADSMARKNADEN I LÄNET De flesta kommuner i landet, 240 stycken, har ett Länsstyrelsens bostadsmarknadsenkät visar underskott av bostäder. Endast fyra av landets 290 på ett underskott av bostäder i länets samtliga kommuner uppger att de har ett överskott av bostäder. kommuner. Länet har sedan 2012 haft en positiv I princip alla landets kommuner bedömer att det befolkningsökning till följd av inflyttning. behöver tillkomma bostäder i någon form under Underskottet på bostäder gäller alla typer av bostäder, de kommande tre åren, framförallt hyresrätter. En både hyres- bostads- och äganderätter. Det byggs i utmaning som de flesta kommuner lyfter är att det alla länets kommuner men cirka 70 procent av de saknas ett utbud av bostäder som är tillgängliga för färdigställda bostäderna ligger i Kalmar kommun. grupper med låga inkomster eller som har en svag Trots att bostadsbyggandet har ökat de senaste åren ställning på bostadsmarknaden av andra anledningar. förväntas det inte vara tillräckligt för att täcka upp för behovet. Utvecklingen skiljer sig mellan regioner men generellt för Sverige fortsätter bostadsbyggandet Lösningen på bostadsunderskottet är inte att enbart att minska. Antalet färdigställda bostäder beräknas bygga bostäder utan fokus måste ligga på vad och bli mycket färre än det långsiktiga behovet. Höga för vem det byggs. De grupper som är i störst behov produktionskostnader, svårigheter att bli beviljade lån av bostäder byggs det sällan för. Den åldrande och brist på attraktiv detaljplanerad mark påverkar befolkningen ställer krav på tillgänglighetsanpassade privata, kommunala och kommersiella byggherrar och bostäder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Ore, Industrial Minerals and Commercial Stones in the Simpevarp Area
    R-04-72 The potential for ore, industrial minerals and commercial stones in the Simpevarp area Hardy Lindroos, MIRAB Mineral Resurser AB October 2004 Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co Box 5864 SE-102 40 Stockholm Sweden Tel 08-459 84 00 +46 8 459 84 00 Fax 08-661 57 19 +468661 57 19 ISSN 1402-3091 SKB Rapport R-04-72 The potential for ore, industrial minerals and commercial stones in the Simpevarp area Hardy Lindroos, MIRAB Mineral Resurser AB October 2004 This report concerns a study which was conducted for SKB. The conclusions and viewpoints presented in the report are those of the author and do not necessarily coincide with those of the client. A pdf version of this document can be downloaded from www.skb.se Summary On behalf of Svensk Karnbranslehantering AB, SKB (the Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company), a survey has been made of existing information concerning the potential for ore, industrial minerals and commercial stones in and around the two candidate areas for a deep repository in Oskarshamn. A deep repository for spent nuclear fuel should not be located in a rock type or in an area where mineral extraction might be considered in the future, since this would make it difficult or impossible to exploit this natural resource. Avoiding such areas reduces the risk that people in the future will come into contact with the deep repository through mineral prospecting or mining activities. The survey has made use of the geoscientific information compiled in the more regional investigations in Oskarshamn Municipality in 1998-99.
    [Show full text]