DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Environmental Impact Statement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Final Environmental Impact Statement FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE HAYS COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN PREPARED BY: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Austin Ecological Services Field Office 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758-4460 CONTRIBUTORS: Loomis Partners, Inc. Smith, Robertson, Elliott, Glen, Klein, & Bell, LLP URS Corporation Zara Environmental, LLC Joe Lessard Texas Perspectives, LLC Capitol Market Research FINAL HAYS COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT MAY 1, 2010 Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agency: U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Adam Zerrenner Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 For Information: Luela Roberts Chief, Consultations and Habitat Conservation Plans U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78758 Abstract: Hays County, Texas, is applying for an incidental take permit (Permit) under Section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), as amended, to authorize incidental take of two endangered bird species: the golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) and the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla), collectively referred to as the “covered species.” In support of the Permit application, the County has prepared a regional habitat conservation plan (RHCP) covering a 30-year period from 2010 to 2040. The permit area for the RHCP is Hays County, Texas. While the entire county would be covered by the proposed Permit, potential habitat for the covered species only occurs on the Edwards Plateau ecoregion located across the western approximately two-thirds of the county (generally west of Interstate Highway 35). The area of potential effect for this Environmental Impact Statement varies with the resource being considered, but typically includes the full extent of Hays County. The requested Permit would authorize incidental take for the covered species associated with up to 9,000 acres of impact to potential golden-cheeked warbler habitat and up to 1,300 acres of impact to potential black-capped vireo habitat within Hays County over the 30-year duration of the plan. Mitigation for the impacts of authorized take would be provided by the conservation program of the RHCP. The RHCP conservation program could also benefit 56 Hays County RHCP Page i Environmental Impact Statement other potentially rare or sensitive species in Hays County (i.e., the RHCP “evaluation” and “additional” species). The RHCP conservation program uses a phased conservation banking approach with a goal of assembling between 10,000 and 15,000 acres of preserve land over the 30-year duration of the RHCP. The preserve system will be assembled on a phased basis as needed to create mitigation credits for the conservation bank and as potential preserve parcels become available from willing partners; there is no pre-determined preserve size, location, or configuration. Habitat for the covered species protected within the preserve system will create mitigation credits for the conservation bank. Banking mitigation credits would allow an equivalent amount of take authorization to be accessed. Therefore, mitigation would always be provided before an equivalent amount of take authorization could be used by the County or issued to RHCP participants. Defined processes for habitat determinations and mitigation assessments, as well as defined mitigation ratios, provide the basis for ensuring that mitigation is commensurate with impacts. Hays County will manage and monitor the preserve system for the benefit of the covered species in perpetuity, in accordance with the RHCP and terms of the Permit. As part of the RHCP conservation program, the County will implement various other measures to avoid or minimize impacts to the covered species, including disseminating maps of potential habitat for the covered species, requesting subdivision or development applicants to provide information about endangered species within their project areas, requiring RHCP participants to implement measures that help prevent the spread of oak wilt and to observe seasonal restrictions on clearing and construction in or near habitat for the covered species, and implementing a public education and outreach program. The County will also dedicate funds for research or studies of one or more of the RHCP evaluation species. The RHCP includes a funding plan that estimates the cost of implementing the conservation program and identifies three types of resources to provide revenue for RHCP implementation: 1) participation fees charged to RHCP participants; 2) annual contributions from County tax revenues; and 3) conservation investments from the County or other sources. Other funding sources, such as grants or debt financing may also be available, but are not modeled in the funding plan. The natural resource and socioeconomic impacts associated with implementing the proposed RHCP have been described and assessed in this EIS. In developing the RHCP, a number of alternatives were considered, including the No Action alternative, a Moderate Preserve/Limited Take alternative, and a Large-scale Preserve alternative. Hays County RHCP Page ii Environmental Impact Statement May 1, 2010 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction, Purpose, and Need ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction and Background .......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 Hays County Background ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1.2 Hays County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan ................................................................... 4 1.2 Purpose and Need for Action ........................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Regulatory Framework .................................................................................................................... 7 1.3.1 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................................................ 7 1.3.1.1 Concepts and Benefits of Regional HCPs .......................................................................... 9 1.3.2 National Environmental Policy Act .........................................................................................10 1.3.3 Texas State Law Relevant to Regional HCPs ..........................................................................11 1.4 Decision Needed..............................................................................................................................12 2.0 Scoping and Public Participation ....................................................................................................13 2.1 Public Scoping ................................................................................................................................13 2.1.1 Formal Scoping Process ...........................................................................................................13 2.1.2 Public Scoping Comments and Responses ...............................................................................14 2.2 Other Public and Stakeholder Involvement .....................................................................................17 2.2.1 Stakeholder and Technical Advisory Committees ...................................................................17 2.2.1.1 Citizens Advisory Committee ...........................................................................................17 2.2.1.2 Biological Advisory Team ................................................................................................20 2.2.2 Hays County RHCP Website ...................................................................................................22 2.3 Alternatives Development ...............................................................................................................22 2.3.1 Alternatives Considered for Detailed Study .............................................................................23 2.3.2 Alternatives Not Considered for Detailed Study ......................................................................24 2.3.2.1 Regulatory Alternative ......................................................................................................24 2.3.2.2 County-only Regional HCP ..............................................................................................25 3.0 Alternatives Considered for Study ..................................................................................................26 3.1 Description of Alternatives Considered for Study ...........................................................................26 3.1.1 Alternative A – No Action .......................................................................................................27 3.1.2 Alternative B – Hays County RHCP (Proposed Alternative) ..................................................28 3.1.3 Alternative C – Moderate Preserve System with a Take Limit ................................................29 3.1.4 Alternative D – Large-scale Preserve System ..........................................................................30 3.2 Comparison of Alternatives .............................................................................................................31
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John C. Abbott Section of Integrative Biology 1
    John C. Abbott Section of Integrative Biology (512) 232-5833, office 1 University Station #L7000 (512) 232-1896, lab The University of Texas at Austin (512) 475-6286, fax Austin, Texas 78712 USA [email protected] http://www.sbs.utexas.edu/jcabbott http://www.odonatacentral.org PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Sciences Postdoc, 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology Ph.D., 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology M.S., 1998 Texas A&M University Zoology/Entomology B.S., 1993 Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science, University of North Texas 1991 APPOINTMENTS 2006-present Curator of Entomology, Texas Natural Science Center 2005-present Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, UT Austin 1999-2005 Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin 2004-present Environmental Science Institute, University of Texas 2000-present Research Associate, Texas Memorial Museum, Texas Natural History Collections 1999 Research Scientist, Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences 1997-1998 Associate Faculty, Collin County Community College (Plano, Texas) 1997-1998 Teaching Fellow, University of North Texas PUBLICATIONS Fleenor, S.B., J.C. Abbott, E. Wang. 2011. Seasonal appearance, diel flight activity, and geographic distribution of male Telegeusis texensis Fleenor and Taber (Coleoptera: Telegeusidae). The Coleopterists Bulletin. 65: 345-349. Abbott, J.C. 2011. The female of Leptobasis melinogaster González-Soriano (Odonata: Coenagrionidae). International Journal of Odonatology. 14: 171-174. Abbott, J.C. and T.D. Hibbitts. 2011. Cordulegaster sarracenia n. sp. (Odonata: Cordulegastridae) from east Texas and western Louisiana, with a key to adult Cordulegastridae of the New World.
    [Show full text]
  • [The Pond\. Odonatoptera (Odonata)]
    Odonatological Abstracts 1987 1993 (15761) SAIKI, M.K. &T.P. LOWE, 1987. Selenium (15763) ARNOLD, A., 1993. Die Libellen (Odonata) in aquatic organisms from subsurface agricultur- der “Papitzer Lehmlachen” im NSG Luppeaue bei al drainagewater, San JoaquinValley, California. Leipzig. Verbff. NaturkMus. Leipzig 11; 27-34. - Archs emir. Contam. Toxicol. 16: 657-670. — (US (Zur schonen Aussicht 25, D-04435 Schkeuditz). Fish & Wildl. Serv., Natn. Fisheries Contaminant The locality is situated 10km NW of the city centre Res. Cent., Field Res, Stn, 6924 Tremont Rd, Dixon, of Leipzig, E Germany (alt, 97 m). An annotated CA 95620, USA). list is presented of 30 spp., evidenced during 1985- Concentrations of total selenium were investigated -1993. in plant and animal samplesfrom Kesterson Reser- voir, receiving agricultural drainage water (Merced (15764) BEKUZIN, A.A., 1993. Otryad Strekozy - — Co.) and, as a reference, from the Volta Wildlife Odonatoptera(Odonata). [OrderDragonflies — km of which Area, ca 10 S Kesterson, has high qual- Odonatoptera(Odonata)].Insectsof Uzbekistan , pp. ity irrigationwater. Overall,selenium concentrations 19-22,Fan, Tashkent, (Russ.). - (Author’s address in samples from Kesterson averaged about 100-fold unknown). than those from Volta. in and A rather 20 of higher Thus, May general text, mentioning (out 76) spp. Aug. 1983, the concentrations (pg/g dry weight) at No locality data, but some notes on their habitats Kesterson in larval had of 160- and vertical in Central Asia. Zygoptera a range occurrence 220 and in Anisoptera 50-160. In Volta,these values were 1.2-2.I and 1.1-2.5, respectively. In compari- (15765) GAO, Zhaoning, 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Georgia
    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Pervasive Gene Flow Across Critical Habitat for Four Narrowly Endemic
    Freshwater Biology (2016) doi:10.1111/fwb.12758 Pervasive gene flow across critical habitat for four narrowly endemic, sympatric taxa † † ‡ LAUREN K. LUCAS* , ZACHARIAH GOMPERT ,J.RANDYGIBSON , KATHERINE L. BELL*, § C. ALEX BUERKLE AND CHRIS C. NICE* *Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, U.S.A. † Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, U.S.A. ‡ U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, San Marcos Aquatic Resources Center, San Marcos, TX, U.S.A. § Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. We studied genetic variation in four endangered animal taxa in the largest freshwater spring complex in the southwestern U.S.A., Comal Springs (TX): Eurycea salamanders, Heterelmis riffle beetles, Stygobromus amphipods and Stygoparnus dryopid beetles. They inhabit a spring complex with nearly stable conditions, which is threatened by climate change and aquifer withdrawals. The four taxa vary in their habitat affinities and body sizes. 2. We used genotyping-by-sequencing to obtain hundreds to thousands of genetic markers to accurately infer the demographic history of the taxa. We used approximate Bayesian computation to test models of gene flow and compare the results among taxa. We also looked for evidence that would suggest local adaptation within the spring complex. 3. An island model (equal gene flow among all subpopulations) was the most probable of the five models tested, and all four taxa had high migration rate estimates. 4. Small numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each taxon tested were associated with environmental conditions and provide some evidence for potential local adaptation to slightly variable conditions across habitat patches within Comal Springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/19/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-25578, and on FDsys.gov 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AY20 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Revision of Critical Habitat for the Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle, Comal Springs Riffle Beetle, and Peck’s Cave Amphipod AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to revise 2 designation of critical habitat for the Comal Springs dryopid beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis), Comal Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis), and Peck’s cave amphipod (Stygobromus pecki), under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, approximately 169 acres (68 hectares) are being proposed for revised critical habitat. The proposed revision of critical habitat is located in Comal and Hays Counties, Texas. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • 211356675.Pdf
    306.1 REPTILIA: SQUAMATA: SERPENTES: COLUBRIDAE STORERIA DEKA YI Catalogue of American Amphibians and Reptiles. and western Honduras. There apparently is a hiatus along the Suwannee River Valley in northern Florida, and also a discontin• CHRISTMAN,STEVENP. 1982. Storeria dekayi uous distribution in Central America . • FOSSILRECORD. Auffenberg (1963) and Gut and Ray (1963) Storeria dekayi (Holbrook) recorded Storeria cf. dekayi from the Rancholabrean (pleisto• Brown snake cene) of Florida, and Holman (1962) listed S. cf. dekayi from the Rancholabrean of Texas. Storeria sp. is reported from the Ir• Coluber Dekayi Holbrook, "1836" (probably 1839):121. Type-lo• vingtonian and Rancholabrean of Kansas (Brattstrom, 1967), and cality, "Massachusetts, New York, Michigan, Louisiana"; the Rancholabrean of Virginia (Guilday, 1962), and Pennsylvania restricted by Trapido (1944) to "Massachusetts," and by (Guilday et al., 1964; Richmond, 1964). Schmidt (1953) to "Cambridge, Massachusetts." See Re• • PERTINENT LITERATURE. Trapido (1944) wrote the most marks. Only known syntype (Acad. Natur. Sci. Philadelphia complete account of the species. Subsequent taxonomic contri• 5832) designated lectotype by Trapido (1944) and erroneously butions have included: Neill (195Oa), who considered S. victa a referred to as holotype by Malnate (1971); adult female, col• lector, and date unknown (not examined by author). subspecies of dekayi, Anderson (1961), who resurrected Cope's C[oluber] ordinatus: Storer, 1839:223 (part). S. tropica, and Sabath and Sabath (1969), who returned tropica to subspecific status. Stuart (1954), Bleakney (1958), Savage (1966), Tropidonotus Dekayi: Holbrook, 1842 Vol. IV:53. Paulson (1968), and Christman (1980) reported on variation and Tropidonotus occipito-maculatus: Holbrook, 1842:55 (inserted ad- zoogeography. Other distributional reports include: Carr (1940), denda slip).
    [Show full text]
  • Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental Impact Statement
    Draft Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: Comal County, Texas Comal County Commissioners Court Prepared by: SWCA Environmental Consultants Smith, Robertson, Elliott, Glen, Klein & Bell, L.L.P. Prime Strategies, Inc. Texas Perspectives, Inc. Capital Market Research, Inc. April 2010 SWCA Project Number 12659-139-AUS DRAFT COMAL COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT April 2010 Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Adam Zerrenner Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas For Information: Bill Seawell Fish and Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas Tele: 512-490-0057 Abstract: Comal County, Texas, is applying for an incidental take permit (Permit) under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended 16 U.S.C. § 1531, et seq. (ESA), to authorize the incidental take of two endangered species, the golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) and the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla), referred to collectively as the “Covered Species.” In support of the Permit application, the County has prepared a regional habitat conservation plan (Proposed RHCP), covering a 30-year period from 2010 to 2040. The Permit Area for the Proposed RHCP and the area of potential effect for this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is Comal County in central Texas. The requested Permit would authorize the following incidental take and mitigation for the golden-cheeked warbler: Take: As conservation credits are created through habitat preservation, authorize up to 5,238 acres (2,120 hectares) of golden-cheeked warbler habitat to be impacted over the 30-year life of the Proposed RHCP.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan
    FINAL COMAL COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Prepared for Comal County, Texas Comal County Commissioners Court Danny Scheel, County Judge Donna Eccleston, County Commissioner, Precinct 1 Jay Millikin, County Commissioner, Precinct 2 Gregory Parker, County Commissioner, Precinct 3 Jan Kennady, County Commissioner, Precinct 4 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 4407 Monterey Oaks Boulevard Building 1, Suite 110 Austin, Texas 78749 www.swca.com Smith, Robertson, Elliott, Glen, Klein & Bell, L.L.P. 221 West 6th Street, Suite 1100 Austin, Texas 78701 Prime Strategies, Inc. 1508 South Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas 78704 Texas Perspectives, Inc. 1310 South 1st Street, Suite 105 Austin, Texas 78704 Capital Market Research, Inc. 605 Brazos Street #300 Austin, Texas 78701 SWCA Project Number 12659-139-AUS August 1, 2013 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ v CHAPTER 1 — BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, AND NEED .................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1.1 Species Included in the RHCP ......................................................................... 1-4 1.1.1.2 Other Listed and Rare Species That May Occur in Comal County
    [Show full text]
  • John C. Abbott Director, Museum Research and Collections Alabama
    John C. Abbott Director, Museum Research and Collections http://www.OdonataCentral.org Alabama Museum of Natural History http://www.MigratoryDragonflyPartnership.org The University of Alabama http://www.PondWatch.org 119 Smith Hall, Box #870340 http://www.AbbottNature.com Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0340 USA http://www.AbbottNaturePhotography.com http://almnh.ua.edua (205) 348-0534, office (512) 970-4090, cell [email protected]; [email protected] EDUCATION Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Sciences Postdoc, 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology Ph.D., 1999 University of North Texas Biology/Ecology M.S., 1998 Texas A&M University Zoology/Entomology B.S., 1993 Texas Academy of Mathematics and Science, University of North Texas 1991 PROFESIONAL EXPERIENCE 2016-present Director, Museum Research and Collections, University of Alabama Museums 2016-present Adjunct Faculty, Department of Anthropology, University of Alabama 2013-2015 Director, Wild Basin Creative Research Center at St. Edward’s University 2006-2013 Curator of Entomology, Texas Natural Science Center 2005-2013 Senior Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, UT Austin 1999-2005 Lecturer, School of Biological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin 2004-2013 Environmental Science Institute, University of Texas 2000-2006 Research Associate, Texas Memorial Museum, Texas Natural History Collections 1999 Research Scientist, Stroud Water Research Center, Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences 1997-1998 Associate Faculty, Collin County Community College (Plano, Texas) 1997-1998 Teaching Fellow, University of North Texas PEER REVIEWED PUBLICATIONS 27. J.C. Abbott. In prep. Description of the male and nymph of Phyllogomphoides cornutifrons (Odonata: Gomphidae): A South American enigma. 26. J.C. Abbott, K.K.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011, February 2012, October 2016, November 2018, and February 2021. Copyright © 2021 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2021 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Male Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing, from Crab Creek, Grant County, Washington, 27 May 2020. Photo by Netta Smith. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 471 species of North American Odonata (Canada and the continental United States) considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approximate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION We publish this as the most comprehensive checklist Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, of all of the North American Odonata. Muttkowski with number of species. (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Anisoptera and Zygoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Needham, Westfall, and May (2014) and West- fall and May (2006), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Oklahoma Odonata
    Libellula comanche Calvert, 1907 - Comanche Skimmer Useful regional references: Libellula composita (Hagen, 1873) - Bleached Skimmer A Checklist of Libellula croceipennis Selys, 1868 - Neon Skimmer —Dragonflies and damselflies of the West by Dennis Paulson (2009) Libellula cyanea Fabricius, 1775 - Spangled Skimmer and Dragonflies and damselflies of the East by Dennis Paulson (2011) Oklahoma Odonata Libellula flavida Rambur, 1842 - Yellow-sided Skimmer Princeton University Press. Libellula incesta Hagen, 1861 - Slaty Skimmer —Damselflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2011) and (Dragonflies and Damselflies) Libellula luctuosa Burmeister, 1839 - Widow Skimmer Dragonflies of Texas: A Field Guide by John C. Abbott (2015) University of Texas Press. Libellula nodisticta Hagen, 1861 - Hoary Skimmer Libellula pulchella Drury, 1773 - Twelve-spotted Skimmer —Oklahoma Odonata Project: https://biosurvey.ou.edu/smith/Oklahoma_Odonata.html Libellula saturata Uhler, 1857 - Flame Skimmer Compiled by Brenda D. Smith — Smith BD, Patten MA (2020) Dragonflies at a Biogeographical Libellula semifasciata Burmeister, 1839 - Painted Skimmer Crossroads: The Odonata of Oklahoma and Complexities Beyond its & Michael A. Patten Libellula vibrans Fabricius, 1793 - Great Blue Skimmer Borders. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. Macrodiplax balteata (Hagen, 1861) - Marl Pennant Miathyria marcella (Selys, 1856) - Hyacinth Glider Oklahoma Biological Survey, Micrathyria hagenii Kirby, 1890 - Thornbush Dasher Oklahoma
    [Show full text]
  • Viscum Album L.) in Urban Areas (A Case Study of the Kaliningrad City, Russia)
    plants Article Ecological and Landscape Factors Affecting the Spread of European Mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in Urban Areas (A Case Study of the Kaliningrad City, Russia) Liubov Skrypnik 1,* , Pavel Maslennikov 1 , Pavel Feduraev 1 , Artem Pungin 1 and Nikolay Belov 2 1 Institute of Living Systems, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Universitetskaya str., 2, Kaliningrad 236040, Russia; [email protected] (P.M.); [email protected] (P.F.); [email protected] (A.P.) 2 Institute of Environmental Management, Urban Development and Spatial Planning, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Zoologicheskaya str., 2, Kaliningrad 236022, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +74012533707 Received: 1 March 2020; Accepted: 19 March 2020; Published: 23 March 2020 Abstract: Green spaces are very important for an urban environment. Trees in cities develop under more stressful conditions and are, therefore, more susceptible to parasite including mistletoe infestation. The aim of this study was to investigate the ecological, microclimatic, and landscape factors causing the spread of European mistletoe (Viscum album L.) in urban conditions. The most numerous hosts of mistletoe were Tilia cordata (24.4%), Acer platanoides (22.7%), and Populus nigra (16.7%). On average, there were more than 10 mistletoe bushes per tree. The mass mistletoe infestations (more than 50 bushes per the tree) were detected for Populus berolinensis, Populus nigra, × and Acer saccharinum. The largest number of infected trees was detected in the green zone (city parks), historical housing estates, and green zone along water bodies. Based on the results of principal component analysis (PCA), the main factors causing the spread of mistletoe on the urban territories are trees’ age and relative air humidity.
    [Show full text]