Final Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan FINAL COMAL COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Prepared for Comal County, Texas Comal County Commissioners Court Danny Scheel, County Judge Donna Eccleston, County Commissioner, Precinct 1 Jay Millikin, County Commissioner, Precinct 2 Gregory Parker, County Commissioner, Precinct 3 Jan Kennady, County Commissioner, Precinct 4 Prepared by SWCA Environmental Consultants 4407 Monterey Oaks Boulevard Building 1, Suite 110 Austin, Texas 78749 www.swca.com Smith, Robertson, Elliott, Glen, Klein & Bell, L.L.P. 221 West 6th Street, Suite 1100 Austin, Texas 78701 Prime Strategies, Inc. 1508 South Lamar Boulevard Austin, Texas 78704 Texas Perspectives, Inc. 1310 South 1st Street, Suite 105 Austin, Texas 78704 Capital Market Research, Inc. 605 Brazos Street #300 Austin, Texas 78701 SWCA Project Number 12659-139-AUS August 1, 2013 [THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK] TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ v CHAPTER 1 — BACKGROUND, PURPOSE, AND NEED .................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.1.1 Species Included in the RHCP ......................................................................... 1-4 1.1.1.2 Other Listed and Rare Species That May Occur in Comal County ................. 1-4 1.1.2 The Concept and Benefits of a Regional Habitat Conservation Plan ................. 1-6 1.2 Legal Requirements Relevant to Regional Habitat Conservation Plans ...................... 1-9 1.2.1 Federal Law ........................................................................................................ 1-9 1.2.1.1 Endangered Species Act and Related Policy ................................................... 1-9 1.2.1.2 National Environmental Policy Act ................................................................. 1-9 1.2.2 Texas State Law Relevant to Regional Habitat Conservation Plans ................ 1-10 1.3 Purpose and Need for Action ..................................................................................... 1-11 1.4 Termination Statement ............................................................................................... 1-11 CHAPTER 2 – COVERED AND EVALUATION SPECIES .................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 Covered Species ........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Golden-cheeked Warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) ........................................... 2-1 2.2.1.1 Golden-cheeked Warbler Natural History ....................................................... 2-1 2.2.1.2 Primary Threats to the Golden-cheeked Warbler ............................................ 2-6 2.2.1.3 Golden-cheeked Warbler Recovery Plan ......................................................... 2-7 2.2.1.4 Current Status of the Golden-cheeked Warbler and its Habitat in Comal County ............................................................................................................ 2-8 2.2.2 Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapilla) ............................................................ 2-16 2.2.2.1 Black-capped Vireo Natural History ............................................................. 2-16 2.2.2.2 Primary Threats to the Black-capped Vireo .................................................. 2-19 2.2.2.3 Black-capped Vireo Recovery Plan ............................................................... 2-19 2.2.2.4 Current Status of the Black-capped Vireo in Comal County ......................... 2-20 2.3 Evaluation Species ..................................................................................................... 2-21 2.3.1 Cagle’s Map Turtle ........................................................................................... 2-21 2.3.2 Eight Obligate Cave-Dwelling Invertebrate Species ........................................ 2-22 CHAPTER 3 – COVERED ACTIONS ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Authorized Actions ...................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Impacts of Covered Actions on Golden-cheeked Warbler ........................................... 3-4 3.2.1 Types of Impacts That May Result from Covered Actions ................................ 3-4 3.2.2 Estimating Levels of Take Resulting from Covered Actions ............................. 3-5 3.2.3 Estimated Loss of Golden-cheeked Warbler Habitat .......................................... 3-6 3.3 Impacts of Covered Actions on Black-capped Vireo ................................................. 3-12 3.4 Cumulative Impacts .................................................................................................... 3-12 3.4.1 Cumulative Impacts on Golden-cheeked Warbler ............................................ 3-12 3.4.2 Cumulative Impacts on Black-capped Vireo .................................................... 3-15 Comal County i Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Table of Contents, continued CHAPTER 4 – MINIMIZATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...................................... 4-1 4.1 Goals and Objectives of the Comal County RHCP ...................................................... 4-1 4.1.1 Biological Goals and Objectives of the RHCP ................................................... 4-2 4.1.1.1 Biological Goals .............................................................................................. 4-2 4.1.1.2 Biological Objectives and Conservation Measures ......................................... 4-2 4.2 RHCP Program Administration ................................................................................... 4-3 4.3 Golden-cheeked Warbler (Covered Species) ............................................................... 4-5 4.3.1 Conservation Plan Components .......................................................................... 4-5 4.3.1.1 Identifying and Minimizing Impact to Warbler Habitat .................................. 4-5 4.3.1.2 Minimizing Disturbance during the Nesting Season ....................................... 4-5 4.3.1.3 Mitigating Impacts to the Golden-cheeked Warbler ........................................ 4-6 4.4 Black-capped Vireo (Covered Species) ....................................................................... 4-8 4.4.1 RHCP Components ............................................................................................. 4-8 4.4.1.1 Minimizing Disturbance during the Nesting Season ....................................... 4-9 4.4.1.2 Mitigating Impacts to the Black-capped Vireo ................................................ 4-9 4.5 Evaluation Species ..................................................................................................... 4-10 4.6 Determining the Status of the RHCP Covered and Evaluation Species..................... 4-10 4.7 Research and Public Awareness ................................................................................. 4-11 4.7.1 Research ............................................................................................................ 4-11 4.7.2 Increasing Public Awareness ............................................................................ 4-11 4.8 RHCP Endowment and Contingency Fund ................................................................ 4-12 4.8.1 RHCP Endowment ............................................................................................ 4-12 4.8.2 Contingency Fund ............................................................................................. 4-12 CHAPTER 5 – PARTICIPATION PROCESS ............................................................................ 5-1 5.1 Eligibility Standards ..................................................................................................... 5-1 5.2 Participation Procedures ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.2.1 Golden-cheeked Warbler .................................................................................... 5-3 5.2.2 Black-capped Vireo ............................................................................................ 5-5 CHAPTER 6 – ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT, MONITORING, AND REPORTING............. 6-1 6.1 Adaptive Management ................................................................................................. 6-1 6.1.1 Adaptive Management Work Group ................................................................... 6-2 6.1.2 Adaptive Management Framework ..................................................................... 6-2 6.1.3 Species and Habitat Tracking Process ................................................................ 6-3 6.2 Monitoring and Reporting ............................................................................................ 6-4 6.2.1 Biological and Compliance Monitoring .............................................................. 6-4 CHAPTER 7 – FUNDING .......................................................................................................... 7-1 7.1 Overview
Recommended publications
  • ARTICLE X. LANDSCAPING Sec 8-447. Purpose. the City of Del Rio
    ARTICLE X. LANDSCAPING Sec 8-447. Purpose. The City of Del Rio experiences frequent droughts and is in a semi-arid climatic zone; therefore, it is the purpose of this article to: (1) Encourage the use of drought resistant plants and landscaping techniques that do not consume large quantities of water. Plants native to Southern Texas/Coahuila Desert are recommended. (2) Establish requirements for the installation and maintenance of landscaping on developed commercial properties in order to improve, protect, and preserve the appearance, character and value of such properties and their surrounding neighborhoods and thereby promote the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Del Rio. More specifically, it is the purpose of this article to: (a) Aid in stabilizing the environment's ecological balance by contributing to the process of air purification, oxygen regeneration, storm water runoff retardation and groundwater recharge; (b) Reduce soil erosion by slowing storm water runoff; (c) Aid in the abatement of noise, glare and heat; (d) Aid in energy conservation; (e) Provide visual buffering and provide contrast and relief from the built-up environment; and (f) Protect and enhance property value and public and private investment and enhance the beautification of the city. (3) Contribute to and enhance the economic welfare of the city and the quality of life of citizens and visitors through the following: a. Promote the image of the southwestern border environment; and b. Create an attractive appearance along city streets
    [Show full text]
  • Pervasive Gene Flow Across Critical Habitat for Four Narrowly Endemic
    Freshwater Biology (2016) doi:10.1111/fwb.12758 Pervasive gene flow across critical habitat for four narrowly endemic, sympatric taxa † † ‡ LAUREN K. LUCAS* , ZACHARIAH GOMPERT ,J.RANDYGIBSON , KATHERINE L. BELL*, § C. ALEX BUERKLE AND CHRIS C. NICE* *Department of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, TX, U.S.A. † Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, UT, U.S.A. ‡ U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, San Marcos Aquatic Resources Center, San Marcos, TX, U.S.A. § Department of Botany, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, U.S.A. SUMMARY 1. We studied genetic variation in four endangered animal taxa in the largest freshwater spring complex in the southwestern U.S.A., Comal Springs (TX): Eurycea salamanders, Heterelmis riffle beetles, Stygobromus amphipods and Stygoparnus dryopid beetles. They inhabit a spring complex with nearly stable conditions, which is threatened by climate change and aquifer withdrawals. The four taxa vary in their habitat affinities and body sizes. 2. We used genotyping-by-sequencing to obtain hundreds to thousands of genetic markers to accurately infer the demographic history of the taxa. We used approximate Bayesian computation to test models of gene flow and compare the results among taxa. We also looked for evidence that would suggest local adaptation within the spring complex. 3. An island model (equal gene flow among all subpopulations) was the most probable of the five models tested, and all four taxa had high migration rate estimates. 4. Small numbers of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in each taxon tested were associated with environmental conditions and provide some evidence for potential local adaptation to slightly variable conditions across habitat patches within Comal Springs.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwards Aquifer Authority Study No. 14-14-697-Hcp
    ATTACHMENT 3 DETERMINATION OF LIMITATIONS OF COMAL SPRINGS RIFFLE BEETLE PLASTRON USE DURING LOW-FLOW STUDY EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY STUDY NO. 14-14-697-HCP FINAL REPORT Prepared by Weston H. Nowlin 601 University Drive Department of Biology Aquatic Station Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666 (512) 245-8794 [email protected] Benjamin Schwartz 601 University Drive Edwards Aquifer Research and Data Center and Department of Biology Aquatic Station Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666 (512) 245-7608 [email protected] Thom Hardy 601 University Drive The Meadows Center for Water and the Environment Texas State University San Marcos, TX 78666 (512) 245-6729 [email protected] and Randy Gibson United States Fish and Wildlife Service San Marcos Aquatic Resources Center 500 East McCarty Lane San Marcos, TX 78666 (512) 353-0011, ext. 226 [email protected] Riffle Beetle Plastron Study - 1 ATTACHMENT 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE PAGE………………………………………………………………………………….……1 TABLE OF CONTENTS…...................................................................................................................................2 LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES……………………………………………………………….……3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………….…4 BACKGROUND AND SIGNIFICANCE…………………………………………………………….….5 INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW…………………………………………………….…6 CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATION, EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN, AND METHODS…………………….…….7 Collection and Housing of Beetles……………………………………………….………….…..7 Conceptual Foundation for Experiments………………………………. ………………………8 Short-Term
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Coastal Gardens
    Detailed lists are available by pole beans, arugula, butter beans, Sept. MAY a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. month at: https://txmg.org/aran- and herbs thru March. Transplant v Wildflowers/Annuals – do not Water with a very slow dripping sas/publications-other-resourc- warm season plants - tomato, mow wildflowers. Let them v Upkeep – check mulch levels, hose 1x/wk several hours - pepper, and eggplant. Protect replenish to 3-4” deep to deter dependent on how hot, dry, or es/news-column-archives/ bloom and go to seed so they warm weather crops from cold. come back next year. weeds, protect from heat, and windy. JANUARY v Fruit Trees – transplant new hold moisture. Keep mulch v Roses – Fertilize 1x/mo through varieties. Prune existing trees APRIL 2-3” away from trunk or stem. Sept. then water deeply. v Upkeep – cold spell predicted? = before they bloom and set fruit. Watch for spider mites, aphids, Deadheading after first spring water. Freeze? = cover plants until v Upkeep – fertilize all plants Remember, the branches you scale, beetles, whiteflies, and blossoms encourages blooming. temp is above freezing. Do not with compost, worm castings, trim won’t give you any fruit this powdery mildew. Check tender Watch for black spot, remove and fertilize until you see new growth or slow release fertilizer 1x/mo year, so don’t go crazy. growth. Many insects can be - and then, only lightly. Remove through summer, and mulch. Pull destroy diseased leaves. Prune washed off with a strong spray of problem and invasive species. v Roses – plant - well-drained weeds. Check for mildew, rust, climbing roses when they finish soil w/ 8 hrs of sun; fertilize.
    [Show full text]
  • USGS/NOAA NORTH AMERICAN PACKRAT MIDDEN DATABASE DATA DICTIONARY by Laura E
    USGS/NOAA NORTH AMERICAN PACKRAT MIDDEN DATABASE DATA DICTIONARY by Laura E. Strickland1, Robert S. Thompson1, and Katherine H. Anderson2 Open-File Report 01- 022 2001 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY 1 Denver, Colorado 2 Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado INTRODUCTION Packrats, also known as wood rats or trade rats, are herbivorous Sigmodontine rodents belonging to the genus Neotoma (Vaughan, 1990). Twenty-one North American species of packrat are widely distributed from the Northwest Territories of Canada (65˚23' N) to tropical Nicaragua (13˚ N) (Vaughan, 1990). Arid and semi-arid lands of the southwestern United States presently support six different packrat species, which have probably persisted in the region, at least intermittently throughout the past 40,000 years (Vaughan, 1990). Vaughan (1990) summarizes the ecology of modern packrats in North America and the southwestern U.S. All modern packrats demonstrate a habit, unique among rodents, of collecting various items from their surrounding environment. These animals gather a variety of materials including plant debris, rocks, bones, insect parts, and human artifacts, generally from within a limited foraging range (30-50 m) of their dens. Not every packrat species has the same dietary preferences or collecting habits, and some species sample their environments better than others by collecting a greater variety of plant materials from the surrounding landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/19/2012 and available online at http://federalregister.gov/a/2012-25578, and on FDsys.gov 1 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS-R2-ES-2012-0082] [4500030114] RIN 1018-AY20 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Proposed Revision of Critical Habitat for the Comal Springs Dryopid Beetle, Comal Springs Riffle Beetle, and Peck’s Cave Amphipod AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Proposed rule. SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), propose to revise 2 designation of critical habitat for the Comal Springs dryopid beetle (Stygoparnus comalensis), Comal Springs riffle beetle (Heterelmis comalensis), and Peck’s cave amphipod (Stygobromus pecki), under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act). In total, approximately 169 acres (68 hectares) are being proposed for revised critical habitat. The proposed revision of critical habitat is located in Comal and Hays Counties, Texas. DATES: We will accept comments received or postmarked on or before [INSERT DATE 60 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. Comments submitted electronically using the Federal eRulemaking Portal (see ADDRESSES section, below) must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on the closing date. We must receive requests for public hearings, in writing, at the address shown in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT by [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter 2021 September
    NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS N e w s Native Plant Society of Texas, North Central Chapter P Newsletter Vol 33, Number 9 S September 2021 O ncc npsot newsletter logo newsletter ncc npsot © 2018 Troy & Martha Mullens & Martha © 2018 Troy Purple Coneflower — Echinacea sp. T Virtual Meeting September 2 September 2nd Program Soil health is vital to Randy everything growing Johnson By Randy Johnson Speaker See page 26 for bio and program details Chapter of the Year (2016/17) Chapter Newsletter of the Year (2019/20) Visit us at ncnpsot.org & www.txnativeplants.org Chapter Leaders Index President — Gordon Scruggs [email protected] President's Corner by Gordon Scruggs ..................... p. 3 History of NCC NPSOT by Martha Mullens ........... p. 4 Past President — Karen Harden Venus' Looking Glass by Martha Mullens ................ p. 5 Vice President & Programs — Flower of the Month, Red buckeyee Morgan Chivers by Josephine Keeney ........................................ p. 6f Recording Secretary — Debbie Stilson What a Plant Knows by Martha Mullens .................. P. 8f Treasurer — Eric Johnson Activities & Volunteering for September 2021 Hospitality Chair — Corinna Benson, by Martha Mullens ....................................... p. 10f Tracie Middleton Answer to last month’s puzzle and a new puzzle ...... p. 12 September Calendar Page by Troy Mullens .............. p. 13 Membership Chair — Beth Barber Fall Symposium ............................................................ p. 14 Events Chair — Position open Bioblitz by Sam Kieschnick
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat and Phenology of the Endangered Riffle Eetle, Heterelmis
    Arch. Hydrobiol. 156 3 361-383 Stuttgart, February 2003 Habitat and phenology of the endangered riffle beetle Heterelmis comalensis and a coexisting species, Microcylloepus pusillus, (Coleoptera: Elmidae) at Comal Springs, Texas, USA David E. Bowles1 *, Cheryl B. Barr2 and Ruth Stanford3 Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, University of California, Berkeley, and United States Fish and Wildlife Service With 5 figures and 4 tables Ab tract: Habitat characteristics and seasonal distribution of the riffle beetles Herere/­ mis comalensis and Microcylloepu pusillus were studied at Comal Springs, Texas, during 1993-1994, to aid in developing sound reconunendations for sustaining their natural popu1atioas. Comal Springs consists of four major spring cutlers and spring­ runs. The four spring-runs are dissimilar in size, appearance, canopy and riparian cover, substrate composition, and aquatic macrophyte composition. Habitat conditions associated with the respective popuJatioos of riffle beetles, including physical-chemi­ cal measurements, water depth, and currenc velocity, were relatively unifom1 and var­ ied lHUe among sampling dates and spring-runs. However, the locations of the beetles in the respective spri ng-runs were not well correlated to current velocity, water depth, or distance from primary spring orifices. Factors such as substrate size and availability and competition are proposed as possibly influencing lheir respective distributions. Maintaining high-quality spring-flows and protection of Lhe physical habitat of Here· re/mis comalensis presently are the only means by which to ensure the survival of this endemic species. Key words: Conservation, habitat conditions, substrate availability, competition. 1 Authors' addresses: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, Texas 78744, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental Impact Statement
    Draft Comal County Regional Habitat Conservation Plan Environmental Impact Statement Prepared for: Comal County, Texas Comal County Commissioners Court Prepared by: SWCA Environmental Consultants Smith, Robertson, Elliott, Glen, Klein & Bell, L.L.P. Prime Strategies, Inc. Texas Perspectives, Inc. Capital Market Research, Inc. April 2010 SWCA Project Number 12659-139-AUS DRAFT COMAL COUNTY REGIONAL HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT April 2010 Type of Action: Administrative Lead Agency: U.S. Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service Responsible Official: Adam Zerrenner Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas For Information: Bill Seawell Fish and Wildlife Biologist U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 10711 Burnet Road, Suite 200 Austin, Texas Tele: 512-490-0057 Abstract: Comal County, Texas, is applying for an incidental take permit (Permit) under section 10(a)(1)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended 16 U.S.C. § 1531, et seq. (ESA), to authorize the incidental take of two endangered species, the golden-cheeked warbler (Dendroica chrysoparia) and the black-capped vireo (Vireo atricapilla), referred to collectively as the “Covered Species.” In support of the Permit application, the County has prepared a regional habitat conservation plan (Proposed RHCP), covering a 30-year period from 2010 to 2040. The Permit Area for the Proposed RHCP and the area of potential effect for this Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is Comal County in central Texas. The requested Permit would authorize the following incidental take and mitigation for the golden-cheeked warbler: Take: As conservation credits are created through habitat preservation, authorize up to 5,238 acres (2,120 hectares) of golden-cheeked warbler habitat to be impacted over the 30-year life of the Proposed RHCP.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report, Lyndon B
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Southern Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network Johnson City, Texas Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report, Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR—2007/073 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park ON THE COVER The Lyndon B. Johnson Ranch House, the “Texas White House”, partially hidden by live oak trees. Photograph by: Dan Cogan USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report, Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park Natural Resource Technical Report NPS/SOPN/NRTR—2007/073 A Report for the Southern Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network National Park Service Southern Plains Inventory and Monitoring Network P.O. Box 329 (mailing) 100 Ladybird Lane (physical) Johnson City, TX 78636 Author Dan Cogan Cogan Technology Inc. 21 Valley Road Galena, IL 61036 May 2007 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Lyndon B. Johnson National Historical Park The Natural Resource Publication series addresses natural resource topics that are of interest and applicability to a broad readership in the National Park Service and to others in the management of natural resources, including the scientific community, the public, and the NPS conservation and environmental constituencies. Manuscripts are peer-reviewed to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and is designed and published in a professional manner. The Natural Resource Technical Reports series is used to disseminate the peer-reviewed results of scientific studies in the physical, biological, and social sciences for both the advancement of science and the achievement of the National Park Service’s mission.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exhibit Runs Through Mid-May
    VOLUME 89 Riverside Nature Center MARCH 2014 Dear Members and Friends, which was developed by Raúl Peña est” setting. and Barbara Lowenthal, with pho- Ordinarily our director Mary Muse tographs by forty photographers. And of course, now that spring is would write this page; however, Visitors to the exhibit can search emerging, the grounds will be she is deep into installing our new the virtual herbarium for plant ablaze with color, and young and exhibit, so she invited me to intro- identification and other informa- old alike will want to walk the na- duce you to this exhibit: tion. ture trails and see the plants in “Wildflowers & Other Natives: their full array. Keeping Texas Looking Like It would be impossible to visit this Texas,” co-sponsored by the Kerr- exhibit without learning some- Many people had a hand in the ville Chapter of the Native Plant thing. There are two PowerPoint exhibit. A list of contributors is on Society of Texas, Native American programs, one on grasses and the Page 7 herein. We thank everyone Seed Company of Junction, and other on wildflowers. Dorothy who contributed and will continue RNC. An energetic and creative Mattiza scanned the wildflower to make a success of this wonder- committee planned and installed pictures; Marilyn Knight photo- ful seasonal exhibit the exhibit. graphed the grasses. A video shows a time lapse of plants and Wildflowers and Other Natives will Ann Witherwax, Artistic Director, an interview with Carroll Abbott, be on view through May. Before created the exhibit layout; the instrumental in founding the Na- you take a drive through the Hill committee then assigned the com- tive Plant Society of Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Redescription of Marstonia Comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a Poorly Known and Possibly Threatened Freshwater Gastropod from the Edwards Plateau Region (Texas)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys Redescription77: 1–16 (2011) of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.77.935 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Redescription of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and possibly threatened freshwater gastropod from the Edwards Plateau region (Texas) Robert Hershler1, Hsiu-Ping Liu2 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013- 7012, USA 2 Department of Biology, Metropolitan State College of Denver, Denver, CO 80217, USA Corresponding author : Robert Hershler ( [email protected] ) Academic editor: Anatoly Schileyko | Received 2 June 2010 | Accepted 13 January 2011 | Published 26 January 2011 Citation: Hershler R, Liu H-P (2011) Redescription of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and possibly threatened freshwater gastropod from the Edwards Plateau region (Texas). ZooKeys 77 : 1 – 16 . doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.77.935 Abstract Marstonia comalensis, a poorly known nymphophiline gastropod (originally described from Comal Creek, Texas) that has often been confused with Cincinnatia integra, is re-described and the generic placement of this species, which was recently allocated to Marstonia based on unpublished evidence, is confi rmed by anatomical study. Marstonia comalensis is a large congener having an ovate-conic, openly umbilicate shell and penis having a short fi lament and oblique, squarish lobe bearing a narrow gland along its distal edge. It is well diff erentiated morphologically from congeners having similar shells and penes and is also geneti- cally divergent relative to those congeners that have been sequenced (mtCOI divergence 3.0–8.5%).
    [Show full text]