DOCSLIB.ORG

Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), Western Colorado: Effects of Stream Capture and Anomalously Rapid Pleistocene River Incision

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), Western Colorado: Effects of Stream Capture and Anomalously Rapid Pleistocene River Incision CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II themed issue Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon (1.4–0.8 Ma), western Colorado: Effects of stream capture and anomalously rapid Pleistocene river incision Andres Aslan1,*, William C. Hood2,*, Karl E. Karlstrom3,*, Eric Kirby4, Darryl E. Granger5,*, Shari Kelley6, Ryan Crow3,*, Magdalena S. Donahue3,*, Victor Polyak3,*, and Yemane Asmerom3,* 1Department of Physical and Environmental Sciences, Colorado Mesa University, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 2Grand Junction Geological Society, 515 Dove Court, Grand Junction, Colorado 81501, USA 3Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Northrop Hall 141, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 4College of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, 202D Wilkinson Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97330, USA 5Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, 550 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA 6New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico 87801, USA ABSTRACT opment of signifi cant relief between adjacent through resistant Precambrian bedrock (Fig. 2). stream segments, which led to stream piracy. It has no major river at its base, and is currently Cosmogenic-burial and U-series dating, The response of rivers to the abandonment drained by two underfi t streams, East and West identifi cation of fl uvial terraces and lacus- of Unaweep Canyon illustrates how the Creeks, which drain the northeast and southwest trine deposits, and river profi le reconstruc- mode and tempo of long-term fl uvial incision ends of the canyon, respectively. Starting with tions show that capture of the Gunnison are punctuated by short-term geomorphic the Hayden Survey (Peale, 1877), geologists River by the Colorado River and abandon- events such as stream piracy. These short- recognized Unaweep as an abandoned canyon ment of Unaweep Canyon (Colorado, USA) term events can trigger signifi cant landscape that was once occupied by the Gunnison River occurred between 1.4 and 0.8 Ma. This event changes, but the effects are more localized (Peale, 1877; Cater, 1966, 1970), the Colorado led to a rapid pulse of incision unlike any relative to regional climatically or tectoni- River (Gannett, 1882), or both (Lohman, 1965, documented in the Rocky Mountains. Fol- cally driven events. 1981; Sinnock, 1981; Aslan et al., 2008a; Hood, lowing abandonment of Unaweep Canyon by 2011). Subsequent debate has focused on which the ancestral Gunnison River, a wave of inci- INTRODUCTION river or rivers cut the canyon, over what time sion propagated upvalley rapidly through period incision occurred, the timing and causes Mancos Shale at rates of ~90–440 km/m.y. Stream capture is a well-known process, but of abandonment, and the amount of fi ll in the The Gunnison River removed 400–500 km3 our understanding of its effects on rates and valley. There has also been debate over whether of erodible Mancos Shale and incised as deep magnitudes of fl uvial incision is hampered by Unaweep Canyon has both a Quaternary and as 360 m in 0.17–0.76 m.y. (incision rates of poor preservation of associated landforms and Paleozoic component to its history (Soreghan ~470–2250 m/m.y.). Prior to canyon aban- uncertainties involving the timing of capture et al., 2007). Recent drilling has resolved the donment, long-term (ca. 11–1 Ma) Gunnison events (Prince et al., 2011). Whereas tectonism thickness of fi ll to be at least 320 m locally River incision averaged ~100 m/m.y. and climate are known to drive landscape change (Soreghan et al., 2007; as predicted by Oesleby, The wave of incision also caused the sub- (e.g., Hoffman and Grotzinger, 1993; Harkins 1983, 2005a). This result demonstrates that sequent capture of the Bostwick–Shinn Park et al., 2007; Bonnet, 2009), the effects of auto- Unaweep is a partially fi lled bedrock canyon, at River by the ancestral Uncompahgre River cyclic processes such as stream capture have least 1 km deep, rivaling the Black Canyon of ca. 0.87–0.64 Ma, at a location ~70 km upval- received considerably less attention (Hasbargen the Gunnison and the inner gorge of the Grand ley from Unaweep Canyon. This event led to and Paola, 2000; Prince et al., 2011). Although Canyon in depth (Donahue et al., 2013). similarly rapid (to ~500 m/m.y.) but local- tectonic and climatic events set the stage for The purpose of this paper is to document the ized river incision. As regional river incision stream capture, the effects of stream piracy on context, timing, and geomorphic effects of the progressed, the juxtaposition of resistant spatial and temporal patterns of fl uvial erosion Unaweep Canyon abandonment. Specifi cally, Precambrian bedrock and erodible Mancos must be evaluated carefully in order to formulate we describe how canyon abandonment initi- Shale within watersheds favored the devel- accurate interpretations of landscape evolution. ated a wave of fl uvial incision that propagated Unaweep Canyon (Colorado, USA) is the upstream along the Gunnison River system, *Email: Aslan: aaslan@ coloradomesa .edu; Hood: most spectacular example of stream piracy triggered at least one additional stream capture whood@ bresnan .net; Karlstrom: kek1@ unm .edu; resulting in canyon abandonment in the upper event, and produced anomalously rapid short- Granger: dgranger@ purdue .edu; Crow: crow .ryan@ gmail .com; Donahue: magdalena .donahue@ gmail Colorado River system (Hunt, 1969, p. 78) term river incision rates. The rates and mag- .com; Polyak: polyak@ unm .edu; Asmerom: asmerom@ (Fig. 1). The present canyon is 40 km long, 5 km nitudes of landscape change brought about by unm .edu. wide, as much as 700 m deep, and is cut mostly this single event are compared with longer term Geosphere; June 2014; v. 10; no. 3; p. 428–446; doi:10.1130/GES00986.1; 18 fi gures; 3 tables; 3 supplemental fi les. Received 24 September 2013 ♦ Revision received 18 February 2014 ♦ Accepted 9 April 2014 ♦ Published online 13 May 2014 428 For permission to copy, contact [email protected] © 2014 Geological Society of America Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/10/3/428/3332562/428.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 Abandonment of Unaweep Canyon 43° N 42° N Upper Colorado River Basin WY 41° N Uinta Mts UT CO Unaweep Cyn 40° N Sawatch Mts 39° N N Fig 2 38° N Fig 5 San Juan Mts 110° W 109° W 108° W 107° W 106° W 50 KM Figure 1. Map showing the location of the study area in Colorado (inset map) and the upper Colorado River basin region (30 m digital elevation model base) including locations of the Colorado and Green Rivers and Unaweep Canyon (Cyn). Locations of Figure 2 and 5 are also shown. Geosphere, June 2014 429 Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/geosphere/article-pdf/10/3/428/3332562/428.pdf by guest on 25 September 2021 Aslan et al. 109.0°W 108.5°W 108.0°W 107.5°W Colorado Grand Junction Grand River Mesa 39.0°N Gunnison Fig. 3 Unaweep Canyon River Cactus Park Delta Uncompahgre Plateau Ancestral Black Canyon Gunnison Uncompahgre River 38.5°N Ancestral Bostwick Creek Pleistocene fill Mancos Shale 10 km Tertiary volcanics Pre-Mancos sedimentary formations Detrital zircon Post-Mancos sedimentary formations Precambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks sample Figure 2. Geologic map of study area showing locations of the modern Colorado, Gunnison, and Uncompahgre Rivers, and important areas including Unaweep Canyon, Cactus Park, Grand Mesa, and Black Canyon of the Gunnison. Location of Figure 3 is also shown. Modifi ed from Williams (1964). fl uvial incision governed by tectonic processes detrital zircon analysis at the University of Ari- races that postdate Unaweep Canyon abandon- that have operated over the past ~10 m.y. in the zona LaserChron Center to evaluate provenance ment were subsampled for U-series age dating upper Colorado River basin (Aslan et al., 2010; of ancient river drainages (Fig. 2; Supplemental (carried out at the University of New Mexico; Karlstrom et al., 2012). Table 11). Additional examination of Colorado Table 2, Supplemental Table 22). River and Gunnison River terraces that postdate Proterozoic Taylor Ranch and Vernal Mesa METHODS the Unaweep Canyon abandonment were also granite (Williams, 1964) were sampled near completed in the vicinity of Grand Junction. Unaweep Divide and Gateway, respectively, Field work included mapping of ancient river At key locations, clast counts (100–200 clasts for apatite fi ssion track (AFT) analysis to bet- gravels and lacustrine deposits in Cactus Park at each site) of representative gravel deposits ter constrain the long-term exhumation history and reconnaissance studies near Gateway. Two were used to characterize gravel compositions. of the area (Table 3; Fig. 3). AFT dates were shallow (<50 m deep) hollow-stem auger drill- Sparry calcite-cemented gravels acquired from determined following procedures outlined in holes were completed in Cactus Park to provide gravel pits of the oldest Colorado River ter- Kelley et al. (1992). Thermal history models core samples of lake beds and cuttings of buried were extracted from the age and track length Gunnison River gravels. Beige sandstone frag- 1Supplemental Table 1. U-Pb zircon geochrono- data using the HeFTy model of Ketcham (2005) ments from the lowermost sample from one of logic analyses of modern and ancient river samples the cores were dated by 26Al/10Be burial dat- by laser ablation–multicollector–inductively coupled 2Supplemental Table 2. U-series results for Colo- ing at the Purdue Rare Isotope Measurement plasma–mass spectrometry. If you are viewing the rado River terraces in the Grand Junction area. If you PDF of this paper or reading it offl ine, please visit are viewing the PDF of this paper or reading it offl ine, Labora tory (Purdue University) to determine http:// dx .doi .org /10 .1130 /GES00986 .S1 or the full- please visit http:// dx .doi .org /10 .1130 /GES00986 .S2 the timing of abandonment (Table 1).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stratigraphy and Correlation of Glacial Deposits of the Rocky Mountains, the Colorado Plateau and the Ranges of the Great Basin
    STRATIGRAPHY AND CORRELATION OF GLACIAL DEPOSITS OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS, THE COLORADO PLATEAU AND THE RANGES OF THE GREAT BASIN Gerald M. Richmond u.s. Geological Survey, Box 25046, Federal Center, MS 913, Denver, Colorado 80225, U.S.A. INTRODUCTION glaciations (Charts lA, 1B) see Fullerton and Rich- mond, Comparison of the marine oxygen isotope The Rocky Mountains, Colorado Plateau, and Basin record, the eustatic sea level record, and the chronology and Range Provinces (Fig. 1) together occupy much of of glaciation in the United States of America (this the western interior United States. These regions volume). include approximately 140 mountain ranges that were glaciated during the Pleistocene. Most of the glaciers Historical Perspective were valley glaciers, but ice caps formed on uplands Following early recognition of deposits of two alpine locally. Discussion of the deposits of all of these ranges glaciations (Gilbert, 1890; Ball, 1908; Capps, 1909; would require monographic analysis. To avoid this, Atwood, 1909), deposits of three glaciations gradually representative ranges in each province are reviewed. became widely recognized (Alden, 1912, 1932, 1953; Atwood and Mather, 1912, 1932; Alden and Stebinger, Purpose and Scope 1913; Blackwelder, 1915; Atwood, 1915; Fryxell, 1930; This report summarizes the evidence for correlation Bradley, 1936). Subsequently drift of the intermediate of the Quaternary glacial deposits in 26 broadly glaciation was shown to represent two glacial advances distributed mountain ranges selected on the basis of (Fryxell, 1930; Horberg, 1938; Richmond, 1948, 1962a; availability of detailed information and length of glacial Moss, 1951a; Nelson, 1954; Holmes and Moss, 1955), record. and the older drift was shown to include deposits of Because the glacial deposits rarely are traceable from three glaciations (Richmond, 1957, 1962a, 1964a).
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado
    •••••a••• ••••a••••aa•a COLORADO Historical Background Study By BENJAMIN LEVY DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Areheology and Historic Preservation October 15, 1968 National Park Service B&WScans U.S. Department of the Interior ..S·fb·~~ FOREIDRD The object of th.is study is to provide the historical data necessary :fOJ: the proper development of a Master Plan for Curecanti Rec:ceation Area, Colorado. This study, authorized by Resource Study Proposal (RSP) CURE-H-1, seeks to identi:fy historical resources and historic sites lo­ cated within or closely associated with the recreation area. Such an undertaking will enable master planning teams to consider the use o:f historical data in interpre­ tive and development programs and provide £or the protection 0£ historic sites and structures. Ideally, thE! background study ought to precede the master plan team's field investigation. The urgency 0£ the Curecanti plan r1equired this investigation to be undertaken immediately at the beginning of the current :fiscal year and compelled it to be done while the team was in the field. Hopefully, this report will have found its way into the team's hands prior to their completion report. This report does not pretend to be a detailed or de­ £ini tive study of the history 0£ the Curecanti area. The urgency of the c:all of this document and the limited time assigned for its preparation permit little more than the examination of secondary sources, although little i published mateI'ial exists on the history ox that stretch of the Gunnison River from Montrose to Gunnison city.
    [Show full text]
  • Pleistocene Drainage Changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand
    New Mexico Geological Society Downloaded from: http://nmgs.nmt.edu/publications/guidebooks/32 Pleistocene drainage changes in Uncompahgre Plateau-Grand Valley region of western Colorado, including formation and abandonment of Unaweep Canyon: a hypothesis Scott Sinnock, 1981, pp. 127-136 in: Western Slope (Western Colorado), Epis, R. C.; Callender, J. F.; [eds.], New Mexico Geological Society 32nd Annual Fall Field Conference Guidebook, 337 p. This is one of many related papers that were included in the 1981 NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebook. Annual NMGS Fall Field Conference Guidebooks Every fall since 1950, the New Mexico Geological Society (NMGS) has held an annual Fall Field Conference that explores some region of New Mexico (or surrounding states). Always well attended, these conferences provide a guidebook to participants. Besides detailed road logs, the guidebooks contain many well written, edited, and peer-reviewed geoscience papers. These books have set the national standard for geologic guidebooks and are an essential geologic reference for anyone working in or around New Mexico. Free Downloads NMGS has decided to make peer-reviewed papers from our Fall Field Conference guidebooks available for free download. Non-members will have access to guidebook papers two years after publication. Members have access to all papers. This is in keeping with our mission of promoting interest, research, and cooperation regarding geology in New Mexico. However, guidebook sales represent a significant proportion of our operating budget. Therefore, only research papers are available for download. Road logs, mini-papers, maps, stratigraphic charts, and other selected content are available only in the printed guidebooks. Copyright Information Publications of the New Mexico Geological Society, printed and electronic, are protected by the copyright laws of the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Topographic Controls on Divide Migration, Stream Capture, and Diversification in Riverine Life
    Earth Surf. Dynam., 8, 893–912, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-8-893-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Topographic controls on divide migration, stream capture, and diversification in riverine life Nathan J. Lyons1, Pedro Val2, James S. Albert3, Jane K. Willenbring4, and Nicole M. Gasparini1 1Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA 2Department of Geology, Federal University of Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, Brazil 3Department of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, CA, USA 4Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Correspondence: Nathan J. Lyons ([email protected]) Received: 16 October 2019 – Discussion started: 24 October 2019 Revised: 9 August 2020 – Accepted: 2 September 2020 – Published: 26 October 2020 Abstract. Drainages reorganise in landscapes under diverse conditions and process dynamics that impact biotic distributions and evolution. We first investigated the relative control that Earth surface process parameters have on divide migration and stream capture in scenarios of base-level fall and heterogeneous uplift. A model built with the Landlab toolkit was run 51 200 times in sensitivity analyses that used globally observed values. Large- scale drainage reorganisation occurred only in the model runs within a limited combination of parameters and conditions. Uplift rate, rock erodibility, and the magnitude of perturbation (base-level fall or fault displacement) had the greatest influence on drainage reorganisation. The relative magnitudes of perturbation and topographic relief limited landscape susceptibility to reorganisation. Stream captures occurred more often when the channel head distance to divide was low.
    [Show full text]
  • A Groundwater Sapping in Stream Piracy
    Darryll T. Pederson, Department of energy to the system as increased logic settings, such as in a delta, stream Geosciences, University of Nebraska, recharge causes groundwater levels to piracy is a cyclic event. The final act of Lincoln, NE 68588-0340, USA rise, accelerating stream piracy. stream piracy is likely a rapid event that should be reflected as such in the geo- INTRODUCTION logic record. Understanding the mecha- The term stream piracy brings to mind nisms for stream piracy can lead to bet- ABSTRACT an action of forcible taking, leaving the ter understanding of the geologic record. Stream piracy describes a water-diver- helpless and plundered river poorer for Recognition that stream piracy has sion event during which water from one the experience—a takeoff on stories of occurred in the past is commonly based stream is captured by another stream the pirates of old. In an ironic sense, on observations such as barbed tribu- with a lower base level. Its past occur- two schools of thought are claiming vil- taries, dry valleys, beheaded streams, rence is recognized by unusual patterns lain status. Lane (1899) thought the term and elbows of capture. A marked of drainage, changes in accumulating too violent and sudden, and he used change of composition of accumulating sediment, and cyclic patterns of sediment “stream capture” to describe a ground- sediment in deltas, sedimentary basins, deposition. Stream piracy has been re- water-sapping–driven event, which he terraces, and/or biotic distributions also ported on all time and size scales, but its envisioned to be less dramatic and to be may signify upstream piracy (Bishop, mechanisms are controversial.
    [Show full text]
  • Formation Mechanism for Upland Low-Relief Surface Landscapes in the Three Gorges Region, China
    remote sensing Article Formation Mechanism for Upland Low-Relief Surface Landscapes in the Three Gorges Region, China Lingyun Lv 1,2, Lunche Wang 1,2,* , Chang’an Li 1,2, Hui Li 1,2 , Xinsheng Wang 3 and Shaoqiang Wang 1,2,4 1 Key Laboratory of Regional Ecology and Environmental Change, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China; [email protected] (L.L.); [email protected] (C.L.); [email protected] (H.L.); [email protected] (S.W.) 2 Hubei Key Laboratory of Critical Zone Evolution, School of Geography and Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China 3 Hubei Key Laboratory of Regional Development and Environmental Response, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China; [email protected] 4 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 November 2020; Accepted: 26 November 2020; Published: 27 November 2020 Abstract: Extensive areas with low-relief surfaces that are almost flat surfaces high in the mountain ranges constitute the dominant geomorphic feature of the Three Gorges area. However, their origin remains a matter of debate, and has been interpreted previously as the result of fluvial erosion after peneplain uplift. Here, a new formation mechanism for these low-relief surface landscapes has been proposed, based on the analyses of low-relief surface distribution, swath profiles, χ mapping, river capture landform characteristics, and a numerical analytical model. The results showed that the low-relief surfaces in the Three Gorges area could be divided into higher elevation and lower elevation surfaces, distributed mainly in the highlands between the Yangtze River and Qingjiang River.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort:Ton of the Eastern.Most Ventura Basin Eu Gene M. Shoemaker
    Geomorphology o f a :F o r t:ton of the East e rn.most Ventura Basin by Eu gene M. Shoemaker 1 948 Relief model of the HtUJi.phreys ( uadr&.ngl e, view lool\:ing northe <~ st (model and photograph by John Lnnce}. Abstract The hl..UYiphreys ;{uadrangl e is a p o rtion of the eastern­ ; most Ventura Basin underlain by a thic k series of Tertiary sedime ntary rocks . On t~eso rocks a gr eat variety of geomorphic forms have bee n molded by t he p rocess es of r unninc water t y:o ical of· a semi-arid climate ancl. b y several ty:qe s of :rw.ss movement . Among t he dii'ferent c a t ar;o:r> i e s of n1s.ss mo v ement -o:i:' e sent, t:t n evr t ype, the sil t f'l..£:2: ,,._ras obs r-i rvc d . 'T'b.e r::eomor::;hj_c f orm.s o:f s:oecia1 int er•e s t :ore ,s-":'nt i .n thG c:~ ·n ·'.' C\ r !.1.:r~ :) .0 :;. r e rock .;ones, open can:y-onh e ads, as~!rmne tri c cs.nyons , e.nd s tre8In terraces and stra.ths . 'l'he author urges t h e a doption of the definition of strath as thRt :p ai~t o f a n old dissectec~. v alley floor, i ncluding the floors of tributary valleys, which was not part of t h e floodp l a i n of t he main v.all ey strearn.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Heritage Assessment of the Uncompahgre River Basin
    The Uncompahgre River Basin A Natural Heritage Assessment Volume I Prepared for Valley Land Conservancy Montrose, Colorado March, 1999 By Peggy Lyon, Tom Stephens, Jeremy Siemers, Denise Culver, Phyllis Pineda, and Jennifer Zoerner Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building, CSU Ft. Collins, CO 80523 User’s Guide The Uncompahgre Basin Biological Assessment conducted by the Colorado Natural Heritage Program consists of two essentially distinct projects that are highly integrated with respect to methodology and fieldwork. This report reflects the separate nature of the projects by being organized in a two-volume set. Volume I presents all potential conservation sites that have been identified in the Uncompahgre Basin that support rare and imperiled plants, animals, and significant plant communities, including wetland and riparian areas. Volume II focuses exclusively on wetland and riparian areas. Volume II also presents “locally significant areas.” These are sites that are among the most important wetlands in the Uncompahgre Basin, but they are not unique from a national or statewide perspective, and therefore these sites did not receive a Biodiversity Rank. Additionally, Volume II presents an assessment of the wetland functions performed by each site that was surveyed. These functional assessments are intended to provide the user with a more complete picture of the value wetlands and riparian areas provide to Uncompahgre Basin residents. Both projects utilized the same Natural Heritage Methodology that is used throughout North America, and both searched for and assessed the plants, animals, and plant communities on the Colorado Natural Heritage Program’s List of rare and imperiled elements of biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Guided Notes on Stream Development, Section 9.2
    Guided Notes on Stream Development, Section 9.2 1. As a stream develops, it changes in shape, width, and size, as well as the landscapes over which it flows. 2. The first and foremost condition necessary for stream formation is an adequate supply of water. 3. The region where water first accumulates to supply a stream is called the headwaters. 4. Moving water carves a narrow pathway into the sediment or rock called a stream channel. 5. Stream banks are the ground bordering the stream on each side. 6. The process by which small streams erode away the rock or soil at the head of a stream is known as headward erosion. 7. Sometimes, a stream erodes its way through the high area separating two drainage basins, joins another stream, and then draws away its water. This process is called stream capture or stream piracy. 8. As a stream actively erodes its path through the sediment or rock, a V-shaped channel develops. V-shaped channels have steep sides and sometimes form canyons or gorges. 9. The lowest base level possible for any stream is sea level, the point at which the stream enters the ocean. 10. As stream channels develop into U-shaped valleys, the volume of water and sediment that they are able to carry increases. 11. A bend or curve in a stream channel caused by moving water is called a meander. 12. The blocked-off meander becomes an oxbow lake, which eventually dries up. 13. The differences in the rate of water flow within meanders cause the meanders to become more accentuated over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Deficiencies in Our Understanding of the Hydro-Ecology of Several Native Australian Fish: a Rapid Evidence Synthesis
    Marine and Freshwater Research, 2018, 69, 1208–1221 © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Supplementary material Deficiencies in our understanding of the hydro-ecology of several native Australian fish: a rapid evidence synthesis Kimberly A. MillerA,D, Roser Casas-MuletB,A, Siobhan C. de LittleA, Michael J. StewardsonA, Wayne M. KosterC and J. Angus WebbA,E ADepartment of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3010, Australia. BWater Research Institute, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3AX, UK. CArthur Rylah Institute for Environmental Research, Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning, Heidelberg, Vic. 3084, Australia. DPresent address: Healesville Sanctuary, Badger Creek Road, Healesville, Vic. 3777, Australia. ECorresponding author. Email address: [email protected] Page 1 of 30 Marine and Freshwater Research © CSIRO 2018 https://doi.org/10.1071/MF17241 Table S1. All papers located by standardised searches and following citation trails for the two rapid evidence assessments All papers are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a reading of the title and abstract. Those deemed relevant on the first screen are marked as Relevant or Irrelevant based on a full assessment of the reference.The table contains incomplete citation details for a number of irrelevant papers. The information provided is as returned from the different evidence databases. Given that these references were not relevant to our review, we have not sought out the full citation details. Source Reference Relevance Relevance (based on title (after reading and abstract) full text) Pygmy perch & carp gudgeons Search hit Anon (1998) Soy protein-based formulas: recommendations for use in infant feeding.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GUNNISON RIVER BASIN a HANDBOOK for INHABITANTS from the Gunnison Basin Roundtable 2013-14
    THE GUNNISON RIVER BASIN A HANDBOOK FOR INHABITANTS from the Gunnison Basin Roundtable 2013-14 hen someone says ‘water problems,’ do you tend to say, ‘Oh, that’s too complicated; I’ll leave that to the experts’? Members of the Gunnison Basin WRoundtable - citizens like you - say you can no longer afford that excuse. Colorado is launching into a multi-generational water planning process; this is a challenge with many technical aspects, but the heart of it is a ‘problem in democracy’: given the primacy of water to all life, will we help shape our own future? Those of us who love our Gunnison River Basin - the river that runs through us all - need to give this our attention. Please read on.... Photo by Luke Reschke 1 -- George Sibley, Handbook Editor People are going to continue to move to Colorado - demographers project between 3 and 5 million new people by 2050, a 60 to 100 percent increase over today’s population. They will all need water, in a state whose water resources are already stressed. So the governor this year has asked for a State Water Plan. Virtually all of the new people will move into existing urban and suburban Projected Growth areas and adjacent new developments - by River Basins and four-fifths of them are expected to <DPSDYampa-White %DVLQ Basin move to the “Front Range” metropolis Southwest Basin now stretching almost unbroken from 6RXWKZHVW %DVLQ South Platte Basin Fort Collins through the Denver region 6RXWK 3ODWWH %DVLQ Rio Grande Basin to Pueblo, along the base of the moun- 5LR *UDQGH %DVLQ tains.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of Unaweep Canyon and Its Role in the Drainage Evolution of the Northern Colorado Plateau
    CRevolution 2: Origin and Evolution of the Colorado River System II themed issue Soreghan et al. Geology of Unaweep Canyon and its role in the drainage evolution of the northern Colorado Plateau Gerilyn S. Soreghan1, Dustin E. Sweet2, Stuart N. Thomson3, Sara A. Kaplan1, Kristen R. Marra1, Greg Balco4, and Thaddeus M. Eccles1 1School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma, 100 East Boyd Street, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA 2Department of Geosciences, Texas Tech University, 125 Science Building, Box 41053, Lubbock, Texas 79409, USA 3Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, 1040 E. 4th Street, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 4Berkeley Geochronology Center, 2455 Ridge Road, Berkeley, California 94709, USA ABSTRACT Thermochronological data from Precam- teau and is the only major canyon in the Colo- brian basement within Unaweep Canyon rado River drainage not occupied by a river. It Unaweep Canyon (Colorado, USA) is a and Permian strata at the western mouth penetrates Mesozoic strata deep into Precam- large, Precambrian-cored gorge that bisects of the canyon indicate onset of incision in brian crystalline basement, but paradoxically the Uncompahgre Plateau of the northeastern latest Miocene time (ca. 6–5 Ma), at a time- hosts two underfi t drainages, East Creek and Colorado Plateau, but has no through-fl ow- averaged rate of ~210–275 m/m.y. Onset of West Creek, which fl ow in opposite directions ing axial stream; it is drained by two underfi t canyon occupation and rapid incision by the from a gentle divide within the canyon (Figs. creeks (East and West Creek) that head at a ancestral Gunnison River coincided with the 1 and 2).
    [Show full text]