DOCSLIB.ORG

The Serpent Worshippers — Johnson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Serpent Worshippers — Johnson Viewpoint The serpent worshippers — Johnson Ignoring Eve, Harrison wrote that the various mother- The serpent goddess images in Greek art pointed to an ideal and peaceful matrifocal (female-centered) society which preceded the Greek patriarchal system. Patriarchy, Harrison wrote, ‘would worshippers fain dominate all things, would invade even the ancient pre- rogative of the mother, the right to rear the child she bore … Robert Bowie Johnson, Jr [it] usurps the function of the mother … .’2 As an example of this male usurpation, she cited the birth of Athena who Each year, millions of young people in our high emerged full-grown from her father, Zeus.2 As one who takes schools, colleges, and universities are attracted to the book of Genesis seriously, I have no difficulty in seeing the study of mythology. Many of them are Christians. the full-grown birth of Athena out of a male god as a picture Mythology is an intriguing subject. However, the of Eve’s full-grown birth out of Adam. Harrison’s atheism literature that rules this field today springs from an blinded her to that possibility. If the patriarchal system was atheistic standpoint which skulks beneath the thin- so anti-female, why then would the Athenians elevate Athena nest possible veneer of honest scholarship. The above all the other gods to the supreme heights of their city, works of Jane Ellen Harrison, Joseph Campbell, and build her the most glorious temple in ancient Greece? and the many other authors who have bought into The facts do not support a time when idyllic matriarchal their erroneous assumptions are treated as insightful cultures ruled. While there is plenty of evidence for goddess and brilliant. They presume to teach the meaning worship in the ancient world, there is next to none pointing of mythology and its relationship to the history of to matrifocal societies, peaceful or otherwise. Harrison’s humanity; however, the reality is that, like the scribes mother died shortly after she was born. Sadly, in her personal and Pharisees of Jesus’ time, their intellectual pride life, tragedy (repeating her own words) ‘invade[d] even the renders them blind to the obvious. ancient prerogative of the mother, the right to rear the child The serpent convinced Eve that what God had said she bore’. Thus, her yearning for a lost nurturing system was not worth considering, and this same serpent’s ruled by women speaks more to what she missed in her own viewpoint is what characterizes and unites these writ- childhood than to any historical reality. ings into a single dominating and deluding literary It took a number of decades, but Barbara G. Walker genre. Many of their facts are correct, but as they finally carried Harrison’s thinking to its logical limits with demean the truth of the book of Genesis, they shun the publication of her 1,124-page The Woman’s Encyclopedia the only context into which the facts sensibly fit. of Myths and Secrets in 1983. In her book, Walker proposes that women once owned all the land, governed its cultiva- tion, and at their discretion made and unmade their sexual attachments.3 That’s why the patriarchal movement made No matter how overt or substantial the evidence, athe- up the myth of Eden—so that men would have an excuse to ist scholars, by definition, cannot conclude that the book blame and disenfranchise women. And, not surprisingly, of Genesis is a valid historical document. That is because ‘Christianity itself was an offshoot of Middle-Eastern God- validation of the truth of Genesis leads inevitably to valida- dess worship’.4 tion of the reality of the God of Genesis. Thus, atheists must develop their own subjective, ambiguous, and convoluted Joseph Campbell explanations for the abundant ancient evidence that points toward the characters and events of Eden. As such, there is After Harrison but before Walker came another atheist, no cohesive foundation to their thinking. They are dogmatic, Joseph Campbell, (1904–1987), who built a large part of his as opposed to being open-minded; sentimental, as opposed thinking on the weak foundations laid out by Harrison. As to being objective; and blind to truth, as opposed to being an American author, editor, and teacher known primarily for truly enlightened. Let’s take a look at their thinking and his writings on myths, Campbell used his own unique forms influence. of sophistry to undermine and deny the ancient evidence that points to the events recounted in the early chapters of Jane Ellen Harrison Genesis. Bill Moyers (see below) made Campbell famous by promoting his work on a PBS series entitled Joseph Campbell Jane Ellen Harrison (1850–1928) was an avowed atheist and the Power of Myth in 1988. An estimated thirty million and author of Prolegomena to the Study of Greek Religion people viewed the original presentation and it has been re- and Epilegomena to the Study of Greek Religion and Themis. aired often as part of PBS fundraising efforts. In 1991, Dr She made a name for herself in the fields of Greek mythology Tom Snyder wrote: and anthropology by projecting her own brand of feminism ‘Campbell has perhaps more influence on cur- onto the ancient world. Her work is especially revered in rent American religious thought than any other con- liberal arts colleges today. temporary writer. His books fill the religion sections 66 TJ 17(3) 2003 The serpent worshippers — Johnson Viewpoint of major bookstore chains; are required reading in must ignore evidence and insights which contradict his athe- most college and university religion, literature, and ism or his whole system falls apart. Note that Campbell does philosophy courses; and have become handbooks not refer to the Eden connection as improbable or unlikely, of spirituality to the New Agers, neo-pagans, Gaia but as impossible; i.e. as something that, in his words, ‘cannot environmentalists, and 1990s religious dabblers.’5 possibly be’. His atheistic standpoint demands that the book Campbell’s influence has only grown in the interven- of Genesis be treated as a fable. Campbell wrote: ing twelve years. More than twenty of his books (authored or ‘No one of adult mind today would turn to the Book of co-authored) are still in print and offered for sale on Amazon. Genesis to learn of the origins of the earth, the plants, com. His erroneous thinking on the subjects of mythology the beasts, and man. There was no flood, no tower of and anthropology continues to pass for wisdom in our high Babel, no first couple in paradise, and between the first schools, colleges and universities. A brief look at Campbell’s known appearance of men on earth and the first build- underlying assumptions will help us understand a revealing ing of cities, not one generation (Adam to Cain) but a flaw at the very heart of his research and ideas. good two million must have come into this world and Joseph Campbell maintained that myths are ‘cultural passed along. Today we turn to science for our imagery manifestations of the universal need of the human psyche of the past and of the structure of the world, and what to explain social, cosmological, and spiritual realities’.6 the spinning demons of the atom and the galaxies of the This is really nothing more than a fancy way of saying that telescope’s eye reveal is a wonder that makes the babel ‘myths are what they are’. Contrary to Campbell’s disguised of the Bible seem a toyland dream of the dear childhood tautology, I maintain that myth is essentially history, and that of our brain.’8 many ancient myths and works of art tell the same story as These words belong at the beginning of Campbell’s the book of Genesis, but from the standpoint that the ser- book so that the reader might know his standpoint; but in- pent is the enlightener of mankind rather than its deceiver. stead, they appear in the last chapter entitled ‘Conclusion’, Campbell was blind to this simple truth as the following implying that all that went before somehow backs them up. example of his errant thinking will show. On page 14 of his Campbell’s paragraph, above, does not represent a validly The Masks of God: Occidental Mythology, he features an deduced conclusion from the facts; on the contrary, it is his illustration of a Sumerian seal (Figure 1). Here we have a biased set of unchallengeable assumptions out of which his man, a woman, a tree, and a serpent. We think immediately study of mythology originates and through which it proceeds. of Eden. But Campbell writes that this ‘cannot possibly be, These assumptions colour his choice of facts and the way in as some scholars have supposed, the representation of a lost which he chooses to present them—thus, his irrational insis- 7 Sumerian version of the Fall of Adam and Eve’. Why not? tence that the Sumerian seal depicting the serpent’s side of Because, he writes, there is no Eden is no such thing. Campbell does not believe what the ‘ … sign of divine wrath or danger to be found. childish ‘babel’ of Genesis says about anything, including There is no theme of guilt connected with the gar- Eden, and is therefore his reason why the Sumerian depic- den. The boon of the knowledge of life is there, in tion could not possibly represent it. He writes that the male the sanctuary of the world, to be culled. And it is figure (Adam) on the Sumerian seal is ‘the ever-dying, ever- yielded willingly to any mortal, male or female, who resurrected Sumerian god who is the archetype of incarnate reaches for it with the proper will and readiness to 7 7 being’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jane Ellen Harrison: Una Mujer En El Mundo Académico Victoriano
    Jane Ellen Harrison: una mujer en el mundo académico victoriano. Jane Ellen Harrison: una mujer en el mundo académico victoriano. Jane Ellen Harrison: a woman in the Victorian academic world BLANCA VERDÍA BARBARÁ Doctorando en Historia I. Departamento de Historia I. Facultad de Geografía e Historia. Universidad de Santiago de Compostela. Recibido o 15 de Outubro de 2010 Aceptado o 2 de Febreiro de 2011 RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN Este artículo expone el modo en que la influencia del contexto histórico en el que se movió la célebre El siglo XIX fue un momento de grandes re- estudiosa de la religión griega antigua, Jane Ellen voluciones y cambios, tanto en la vida eco- Harrison (1850-1928) se impuso sobre su persona- nómica como en la política, la tecnología o el lidad y cómo ésta refleja asimismo los principales contexto de lo social; no hay más que recor- motivos, tanto tradicionales como rupturistas, de dar la Revolución Industrial, los movimientos su tiempo. Igualmente, tratará someramente la in- obreros, la lucha por la extensión del derecho cidencia de estas influencias sobre algunos temas al voto, el cambio en los roles de los sexos o recurrentes de sus obras y cómo su evolución vi- el conflicto que enfrenta a Ciencia y Religión. tal implicó una evolución intelectual, concluyendo También es el siglo de la expansión imperia- que la condición femenina dentro de un mundo lista de Gran Bretaña y de los nuevos méto- académico masculino, y la moral victoriana que le dos y enfoques de los estudios antropológicos fue impuesta tuvieron consecuencias fundamenta- que, a pesar de sus puntos todavía racistas, les en su obra.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia Woolf, Jane Ellen Harrison, a N D T H E Spirit of Modernist Classicism
    CLASSICAL MEMORIES/MODERN IDENTITIES Paul Allen Miller and Richard H. Armstrong, Series Editors Virginia Woolf, Jane Ellen Harrison, AND THE Spirit of Modernist Classicism R Jean Mills THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 2014 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Control Number 2014931257 Cover design by Mary Ann Smith Type set in Adobe Sabon Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48–1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 For Martha Lou Haag, Potnia Theron and Tenth Muse CONTENTS List of Illustrations ix Key to Titles x Acknowledgments xii INTRODUCTION Virginia Woolf, Jane Ellen Harrison, and the Spirit of Modernist Classicism: A Transpersonal Modernism 1 CHAPTER 1 Of the Nymph and the Noun: Jane Harrison, Janet Case, and Virginia Woolf’s Greek Education—From Mentorship to Transpersonal Desire 38 CHAPTER 2 The Making and Re-Making of a God(dess): Re-writing Modernism’s War Story—Feminist Ritual Structures as Transpersonal Plots 62 CHAPTER 3 Reading Transpersonally I—“Next Comes the Wife’s Room . ”: A Room of One’s Own and “Scientiae Sacra Fames” 115 CHAPTER 4 Reading Transpersonally II—Women Building Peace: Three Guineas and “Epilogue on the War: Peace with Patriotism” 134 viii CONTENTS CHAPTER 5 To Russia with Love: Literature, Language, and a Shared Ideology of the Political Left 153 AFTERWORD Modernism’s Transpersonal and: Re-connecting Women’s Lives/Women’s Work and the Politics of Recovering a Reputation 168 Bibliography 177 Index 186 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FIGURE 1 Jane Harrison as a young Classics student, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ELEUSINIAN MYSTERIES of DEMETER and PERSEPHONE: Fertility, Sexuality, Ancl Rebirth Mara Lynn Keller
    THE ELEUSINIAN MYSTERIES OF DEMETER AND PERSEPHONE: Fertility, Sexuality, ancl Rebirth Mara Lynn Keller The story of Demeter and Persephone, mother and daugher naturc goddesses, provides us with insights into the core beliefs by which earl) agrarian peoples of the Mediterranean related to “the creative forces of thc universe”-which some people call God, or Goddess.’ The rites of Demetei and Persephone speak to the experiences of life that remain through all time< the most mysterious-birth, sexuality, death-and also to the greatest niys tery of all, enduring love. In these ceremonies, women and inen expressec joy in the beauty and abundance of nature, especially the bountiful harvest in personal love, sexuality and procreation; and in the rebirth of the humail spirit, even through suffering and death. Cicero wrote of these rites: “Wc have been given a reason not only to live in joy, but also to die with bettei hope. ”2 The Mother Earth religion ceIebrated her children’s birth, enjoyment of life and loving return to her in death. The Earth both nourished the living and welcomed back into her body the dead. As Aeschylus wrote in TIic Libation Bearers: Yea, summon Earth, who brings all things to life and rears, and takes again into her womb.3 I wish to express my gratitude for the love and wisdom of my mother, hlary 1’. Keller, and of Dr. Muriel Chapman. They have been invaluable soiirces of insight and under- standing for me in these studies. So also have been the scholarship, vision atdot- friendship of Carol €! Christ, Charlene Spretnak, Deem Metzger, Carol Lee Saiichez, Ruby Rohrlich, Starhawk, Jane Ellen Harrison, Kiane Eisler, Alexis Masters, Richard Trapp, John Glanville, Judith Plaskow, Jim Syfers, Jim Moses, Bonnie blacCregor and Lil Moed.
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Listing of Contents
    WOMEN'S STUDIES LIBRARIAN EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS VOLUME 16, NUMBER 2 SUMMER 1996 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard Women's Studies Librarian University of Wisconsin System 430 Memorial Library / 728 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263-5754 EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS Volume 16, Number 2 Summer 1996 Periodical literature is the culling edge ofwomen's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing of Contents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing public awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminist Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from current issues ofmajor feministjournals are reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. subscription price(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Untranslatability and the Chorus in Virginia Woolf and H.D
    Untranslatability and the Chorus in Virginia Woolf and H.D. Within reception studies, there has been a growing interest in modernist responses to Hellenism (Hooley 2001; Rosenblitt 2016; Prins 2017; Worman 2018). Critical to the transmission and adaptation of Greek texts during this period were women of classical letters. What drew them to the translation and adaptation of the ancient Greek language was, uniquely, the promise of “an encounter with something untranslatable” (Prins 2017: 31). Focusing on the work of Virginia Woolf and H.D. (Hilda Doolittle), this paper argues that the experience of linguistic estrangement encountered in the act of translating Greek specifically involved the tragic chorus. The resistance of the choral form to translation offered Woolf and H.D. the freedom to adapt it to their own literary experiments, allowing them to fashion a new feminist aesthetic that challenged the masculine classical heritage. Woolf and H.D. derived their ideas of the Greek chorus from two main sources: the work of the first British female classicist, Jane Ellen Harrison, and contemporary modernist translation theory. Woolf was a personal acquaintance of Harrison and attended her public lectures (Mills 2014: 8), while H.D. knew of her ideas indirectly through Gilbert Murray (Gregory 1997: 123-4). They drew on Harrison’s fascination with the chorus as a “queer anomaly” that nonetheless functioned as “the centre and kernel and starting-point of the drama” (Harrison 1913: 123). Modernist poets like Ezra Pound and Richard Aldington also had a strong interest in the choral ode, erroneously viewing it as a form of vers libre because of its absence of rhyme, spare language, traditional meters, and short lines (Gregory 1997: 140; Prins 2017: 180-201).
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Ellen Harrison and the Greek Chorus
    Jane Ellen Harrison and the Greek Chorus The Greek chorus is having a moment. The surge of interest among classicists in choral performance, referred to as ‘chorality’, has restored to the chorus to center stage, starting with the landmark work of Calame, Les choeurs du jeunes filles en grèce archaïque (1977) and followed more recently by the volumes of Gagné and Hopman (2013) and Billings, Budelmann, and Macintosh 2014, among others. But the chorus generated a similar amount of attention just over a hundred years ago, both among classical scholars and popular imagination. A pivotal figure in the reception of the Greek chorus during this period was the first female classical scholar, Jane Ellen Harrison (1850-1928). This paper examines Harrison’s ideas about the chorus and then discusses briefly their influence on the contemporary writers H.D. (1886-1961), Virginia Woolf (1882-1941), and the dancer Isadora Duncan (1877-1927). The demise of the chorus as a cultural and literary form in the Roman era contributed to its post-classical status as an enigmatic anomaly, a ‘problem’ debated and theorized by German idealist thinkers (Billings 2013). Almost two centuries later, the Greek chorus had become surprisingly popular in a variety of contexts, including scholarly debates about the origin of Greek tragedy and the layout of the ancient theater, productions of Greek tragedy in colleges and on the professional stage, modernist poetry, and even modern dance. This ‘rebirth’ of the chorus can be attributed in part to Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy published in 1872, which singled out the chorus for its “astonishing significance” (Birth 129).
    [Show full text]
  • J Ane Ellen Harrison
    JANE ELLEN HARRISON AN ADDRESS Delivered at N ewnham College LVUa . October 27th, 1928 BY GILBERT MURRAY Regius Prqftssor qf Greek in the University qf Oxford Ont Bhilling net Cambridge W. HEFFER & SONS LTD. 1~28 RTp ~p JANE ELLEN HARRISON AN ADDRESS Delivered at N ewnham College October 27th, 1928 BY GILBERT MURRAY Regius Professor of Greek i71 the Ul1iv ersity of Oxford Cambridge W. HEFFER & SONS LTD. 1928 . JANE ELLEN HARRISON, 1850-1928 "THE Year Spirit, born young again every spring, has entered into your soul, and taught us all alike to feel ourselves the companions and sharers of your youthful­ ness." So wrote WaIter Leaf in the address of farewell sent to Jane Harrison by various friends when she left Cambridge for Paris. And in re-reading it, there come to my mind his other words of farewell, the verses in his book on Troy addressed to the memory of three friends, three great Cambridge scholars, MaitIand, Butcher, and Verrall: XaLp€T€ Kav cp8LfJ.€VOL~ K€cpaAal CPLAaL' ou yap IT' "Ap'1~ ' \ r \ '(.:j' ,- X atp€LV TOV~ ~WOV~ OfJPLfJ.O€pyO~ €Cf •••• EilO€T€ V~OVfJ.OJJ i17rvov. 'Ey~ 0' €7rl y~pao~ OUOo/ 'yfJ.a~ oaKpuw Kat (TOCPL'1V cp8LfJ.€v'1V. "Be glad among the departed, beloved faces; for Ares with brutal deeds suffers no gladness now among the living. .. Sleep your deep sleep, while I on the threshold of old age shed tears for you and for learning lost." Leaf, Verrall, Butcher, MaitIand, four of the greatest names of English schola~ship are commemo­ rated together in those verses, and J ane Harrison belonged to the same generation and the same brilliant group of friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity Sowon S
    This article was downloaded by: [the Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford] On: 20 October 2012, At: 13:17 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Women: A Cultural Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rwcr20 Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity Sowon S. Park Version of record first published: 09 Mar 2011. To cite this article: Sowon S. Park (2011): Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity, Women: A Cultural Review, 22:1, 69-78 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2011.545656 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae, and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand, or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity
    UC Santa Barbara UC Santa Barbara Previously Published Works Title Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8rh2p785 Journal Women: A Cultural Review, 22(1) ISSN 0957-4042 Author Park, Sowon S Publication Date 2011-03-01 DOI 10.1080/09574042.2011.545656 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California This article was downloaded by: [the Bodleian Libraries of the University of Oxford] On: 20 October 2012, At: 13:17 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Women: A Cultural Review Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rwcr20 Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity Sowon S. Park Version of record first published: 09 Mar 2011. To cite this article: Sowon S. Park (2011): Apostolic Minds and the Spinning House: Jane Ellen Harrison and Virginia Woolf's Discourse of Alterity, Women: A Cultural Review, 22:1, 69-78 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09574042.2011.545656 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.
    [Show full text]
  • Max Müller, Charles Darwin and the Science of Religion
    HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies ISSN: (Online) 2072-8050, (Print) 0259-9422 Page 1 of 8 Original Research Max Müller, Charles Darwin and the science of religion Author: The science of religion, as a discipline distinct from theology emerging in the 19th century, 1 Ulrich Berner from the beginning was closely related to the discourse on Darwinism. This article focusses on Affiliation: Max Müller, known as ‘The father of Comparative Religion’, who was involved in the 1Department of Religious Darwinian discourse, compared with Jane Ellen Harrison who emphasised the impact of the Studies, Faculty of Cultural theory of evolution, approaching, however, the ‘scientific study of religion’ from a different Studies, University of viewpoint. Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany Contribution: From a historical point of view, this article discusses the relationship between Corresponding author: Ulrich Berner, different strands in Religious Studies (Religionswissenschaft), and, also, touches upon the [email protected] relationship between Religious Studies and Theology. Dates: Keywords: Darwinism; comparative religion; theology; Max Müller; Jane E. Harrison. Received: 10 Apr. 2021 Accepted: 25 May 2021 Published: 05 Aug. 2021 When Jane Ellen Harrison, known as an expert on Greek religion, gave a talk on ‘The Influence of Darwinism on the Study of Religions’, she revealed to the audience that the title of her paper How to cite this article: might well have been ‘The Creation by Darwinism of the Scientific Study of Religions’ (Harrison Berner, U., 2021, ‘Max Müller, Charles Darwin and the 1915:143). Although she had changed the title, in order to avoid ‘any shadow of exaggeration’, she science of religion’, insisted that the new view on religion – regarding it as ‘a proper subject for scientific study’ – was HTS Teologiese Studies/ made ‘possible, and even necessary’ by the doctrine of evolution (Harrison 1915:143/144).
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Resources
    Electronic Resources Bloomsbury- related collections: http://specialcollections.lib.sussex.ac.uk Materials related to the Bloomsbury Group. Genesis: http:www.genesis.ac.uk Genesis is a women’s history resource produced collaboratively by the Women’s Library, the Archive Hub and over 200 heritage institutions. Katherine Mansfield Society: http://www.katherinemansfieldsociety.org/ Online resources for Katherine Mansfield. LION: Literature online: http://lion.chadwyck.co.uk Enables a wide variety of searches e.g. by authors within literary movements. Literary Encyclopedia: www.litencyc.com/ A reliable online encyclopedia written by scholars. Middlebrow Network: http://www. middlebrow- network.com/ AHRC- funded network of scholars working on middlebrow writing plus resource bank. Modernist Journals Project: http://www.modjourn.org/journals.html Modernist Magazines Project: http://modmags.cts.dmu.ac.uk/ These two websites con- tain invaluable resource for the study of modernism in e-magazines and journals including digital editions of magazines up to the year 1922. Orlando Project: http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/orlando/ Integrated online resource for British women’s writing in the British Isles. Space Between Society: http://www.spacebetweensociety.org Inter- disciplinary society dedicated to the literature and culture of the interwar period with annual journal produced at Monmouth University. Sylvia Townsend Warner Society: http://www.townsendwarner.com Online resources for Sylvia Townsend Warner. Virginia Woolf Society: http://www.virginiawoolfsociety.co.uk/ Online resources for Virginia Woolf. Women’s Library: http://www.londonmet.ac.uk/thewomenslibrary/ Britain’s most exten- sive library and resources centre of women’s history and literature with online catalogue. University of Bristol Theatre Collection: http://www.bris.ac.uk/theatrecollection/ The University of Bristol Theatre Collection is an accredited museum and research centre dedicated to the study of British Theatre History.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Zimmerman?S Theatrical Responses to Classical Literature
    Published on Classicizing Chicago (http://www.classicizingchicago.northwestern.edu) Home > 'Perpetually Relevant, Perpetually New': Mary Zimmerman?s Theatrical Responses to Classical Literature 'Perpetually Relevant, Perpetually New': Mary Zimmerman?s Theatrical Responses to Classical Literature Author: McConnell, Justine [1] Date of publication: 2010 Jump to section: The Odyssey Metamorphoses Trojan Women Argonautika Mary Zimmerman, the highly-acclaimed theatre director, is the recipient not only of numerous Chicago- based Joseph Jefferson Awards honouring local theatre talent, but also of a Tony Award for her 2002 direction of Metamorphoses, as well as a 1998 Macarthur ?Genius? Award, intended to support and recognise a select few individuals considered to show exceptional creative potential. A member of the Lookingglass Theatre and an Artistic Associate of the Goodman Theatre, both in Chicago, she is also a Professor of Performance Studies at Northwestern University. It is at Northwestern that many of her productions are first staged, and it is there too that her own theatrical training began in earnest. Zimmerman began her undergraduate studies at Northwestern majoring in Composition and Literature, but within a matter of weeks she had transferred to the Theatre Department for her Bachelor?s degree, and later to the Performance Studies Department where she remained for her MA, PhD, and beyond into her academic career. Northwestern, along with New York University (NYU), has been considered the birthplace of the emerging discipline of Performance Studies, and Zimmerman was studying in the department when it was in its infancy.1 To date, Mary Zimmerman has adapted and directed four productions from the classical canon: The Odyssey, Metamorphoses, The Trojan Women, and Argonautika, as well as a number of works derived from the mythic and oral traditions of other cultures, such as Persia (The Arabian Nights, 1992, and Mirror of the Invisible World, 1997).
    [Show full text]