DOCSLIB.ORG

Mitotic MELK-Eif4b Signaling Controls Protein Synthesis and Tumor Cell Survival

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mitotic MELK-Eif4b Signaling Controls Protein Synthesis and Tumor Cell Survival Mitotic MELK-eIF4B signaling controls protein synthesis and tumor cell survival Yubao Wanga,b, Michael Begleyc,d, Qing Lia,b, Hai-Tsang Huanga,b, Ana Lakoa,b, Michael J. Ecka,b, Nathanael S. Graya,b, Timothy J. Mitchisond, Lewis C. Cantleyc,d,e,1, and Jean J. Zhaoa,b,1 aDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115; bDepartment of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; cDepartment of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215; dDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115; and eMeyer Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 Contributed by Lewis C. Cantley, July 7, 2016 (sent for review May 2, 2016; reviewed by Kun-Liang Guan and Sean J. Morrison) The protein kinase maternal and embryonic leucine zipper kinase complement the posttranslational inactivation of specific proteins (MELK) is critical for mitotic progression of cancer cells; however, (8). Nevertheless, protein synthesis still occurs during mitosis, al- its mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. By combined though at an overall rate that is 30–65% of the overall rate in in- approaches of immunoprecipitation/mass spectrometry and pep- terphase cells (6, 8, 9). Moreover, the translation of certain mRNAs, tide library profiling, we identified the eukaryotic translation such as c-Myc, MCL1, and ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), is even initiation factor 4B (eIF4B) as a MELK-interacting protein during elevated during mitosis (8, 9). Together, these studies suggest mitosis and a bona fide substrate of MELK. MELK phosphorylates that protein synthesis may be functionally important for mi- eIF4B at Ser406, a modification found to be most robust in the totic cells and might be finely regulated by as yet unidentified mitotic phase of the cell cycle. We further show that the MELK– signaling pathways. eIF4B signaling axis regulates protein synthesis during mitosis. In this study, we aimed to identify downstream effectors of the Specifically, synthesis of myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1), an anti- mitotic kinase MELK. Intriguingly, we found that MELK phos- apoptotic protein known to play a role in cancer cell survival dur- phorylates the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4B (eIF4B). – ing cell division, depends on the function of MELK-elF4B. Our data implicate the MELK eIF4B pathway as a previously Inactivation of MELK or eIF4B results in reduced protein synthesis unrecognized signaling mechanism regulating mitotic protein CELL BIOLOGY of MCL1, which, in turn, induces apoptotic cell death of cancer synthesis and tumor cell survival. cells. Our study thus defines a MELK–eIF4B signaling axis that reg- Results ulates protein synthesis during mitosis, and consequently influ- ences cancer cell survival. Peptide Library Screen Identifies the Optimal Substrate Motif for MELK. To identify kinase substrates of MELK that mediate its MELK | eIF4B | MCL1 | protein synthesis | mitosis role in the regulation of mitosis and cell survival, we determined the consensus phosphorylation motif for MELK. Proteins carrying the optimal substrate motif are likely phosphorylated by MELK, aternal and embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK) is a and thus represent potential in vivo substrates. We expressed ac- Mserine/threonine kinase with potential roles in mitosis. tive full-length human MELK in insect cells and subjected the Similar to other established mitotic factors, such as Aurora ki- purified kinase to positional scanning peptide library screening, a nases and cyclin B1, MELK demonstrates increased protein technique that has been used extensively to identify optimal sub- abundance during mitosis and is degraded when cells progress strate motifs for kinases (10, 11). The profiling demonstrated that into G1 phase (1, 2). Our recent study proposed an essential role MELK is highly selective for its substrate, with a strong preference of MELK in the mitotic progression of specific cancer cell types, for arginine at the −3 position relative to the phosphoacceptor with MELK knockdown resulting in multiple mitotic defects, including G2/M arrest and mitotic cell death (2). Despite these Significance advances, there is a lack of mechanistic understanding of the role of MELK during cell division. An immediate question is the The work identifies the eukaryotic translation initiation factor identity of the MELK substrates that mediate its role in mitosis, 4B (eIF4B) as a substrate of maternal and embryonic leucine such as promoting mitotic cell survival. zipper kinase (MELK), a mitotic kinase known to be essential Myeloid cell leukemia 1 (MCL1) is an important negative reg- for aggressive types of malignancy. The MELK–eIF4B axis thus ulator of apoptosis. Uniquely among the Bcl-2 family, it is turned represents a previously unidentified signaling pathway that over rapidly by ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis and must be regulates protein synthesis during mitosis and, consequently, continuously resupplied by translation (3, 4). Protein abun- dance of MCL1 decreases during prolonged mitotic arrest in- the survival of cancer cells. duced by antimicrotubule drugs, rendering arrested cells highly Author contributions: Y.W., L.C.C., and J.J.Z. designed research; Y.W., M.B., and A.L. sensitive to inhibitors of other Bcl-2 family members (5). We performed research; Y.W., M.B., Q.L., H.-T.H., M.J.E., N.S.G., and L.C.C. contributed new thus speculate that synthesis of MCL1 is important for cell reagents/analytic tools; Y.W., N.S.G., T.J.M., L.C.C., and J.J.Z. analyzed data; and Y.W., T.J.M., survival during normal and drug-arrested mitosis and, con- and J.J.Z. wrote the paper. versely, that a drug that decreases MCL1 synthesis during mi- Reviewers: K.-L.G., University of California, San Diego; and S.J.M., University of Texas tosis might have anticancer potential. Southwestern Medical Center. The rate of protein synthesis and other basic biological processes, Conflict of interest statement: L.C.C. is a member of the Board of Directors of, and holds such as DNA or RNA biogenesis, fluctuates throughout the cell equity in Agios Pharmaceuticals, a company that is developing drugs that target cancer cycle. Overall protein synthesis significantly decreases when cells metabolism. L.C.C. is also a founder of and holds equity in Petra Pharmaceuticals. The data presented in this manuscript are unrelated to research at Agios Pharmaceuticals or Petra enter mitosis (6, 7), consistent with the notion that macromolecule Pharmaceuticals. The phosphorylation of eIF4B and related methods of use reported in this synthesis predominantly occurs in interphase before the segregation study are covered in the following published patent application: WO 2015073509 A2. of cellular mass in mitosis. 1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: [email protected] or A recent study based on ribosome profiling identified a set of [email protected]. genes that are translationally repressed in mitosis, and proposed that This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. suppressed protein synthesis might provide a unique mechanism to 1073/pnas.1606862113/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1606862113 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 – A Fixed residue D regulating cell survival (12). The MELK eIF4B interaction was further confirmed by ectopic expression of MELK or eIF4B in Fixed position A p-eIF4B HEK293T cells (Fig. S1 ). (S406) We proceeded to examine whether eIF4B carries the optimal substrate motif for MELK. Two serine residues of eIF4B, Ser406 p-eIF4B and Ser422, conformed to the consensus phosphorylation se- (S422) quence (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1B). In addition, S406/S422 and their flanking residues are evolutionarily conserved across vertebrates eIF4B (Fig. 1C and Fig. S1B), indicating that these residues might be subject to posttranslational modifications. Together, these find- p-Akt (T308) ings suggest that eIF4B might be a protein substrate of MELK. p-Akt (S473) EIF4B Phosphorylation During Mitosis. Given that MELK is a mi- totic kinase, its potential role in regulating eIF4B phosphoryla- Akt tion drove us to investigate first how eIF4B phosphorylation occurs at different stages of the cell cycle. We harvested mitotic MDA-MB- -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 +1 +2 +3 +4 p-MAPK 468 cells at prometaphase through nocodazole- or paclitaxel-induced B Input IP Akt / MAPK signaling (T202/Y204) Flag-MELK IP_MS/MS cell cycle arrest. As expected, the cells were enriched for mitotic - + - + Dox factors, including MELK, cyclin B1, and Aurora kinase A, and, in- # peptides Protein MAPK recovered name MELK terestingly, exhibited strong phosphorylation of eIF4B at Ser406, but not at Ser422 (Fig. 1D and Fig. S1C). In contrast, phosphorylation of 108 MELK eIF4B p-Histone H3 91 eIF4B (S10) some of the known upstream signaling molecules, such as Akt or MAPK (13), was apparently decreased in mitotic cells (Fig. 1D and C eIF4B S406 Cyclin B1 Fig. S1C). Human S406 RERHPSWRSE R S Chimpanzee S406 RE HP WRSE Aurora A Mitotic markers MELK Directly Phosphorylates eIF4B at Ser406. Monkey S402 RERHPSWRSE To investigate Cattle S406 RERHPSWRSE whether MELK phosphorylates eIF4B, we first performed R S Dog S406 RE HP WRSE MELK in vitro kinase assays using purified recombinant MELK and Mouse S406 RERHPSWRSE Rat S406 RERHPSWRSE eIF4B. MELK potently induced phosphorylation of eIF4B at Zebrafish S403 RERHPSWRSE Ser406, and to a lesser extent at Ser422, as indicated by immu- R S -tubulin Xenopus S423 RE HP WRSD noblot analysis with phospho-specific antibodies (Fig. 2A). We Fig. 1. Consensus phosphorylation motif for MELK. (A) Positional scanning also examined the effect of chemical inhibition of MELK kinase peptide library (PSPL) screen identified the optimal phosphorylation motif activity using OTSSP167 (14), and found that the inhibitor effi- for MELK. (Top) Phosphor imaging of a PSPL screen after in vitro reaction ciently suppressed MELK-driven eIF4B phosphorylation at with recombinant full-length MELK and radiolabeled ATP.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supplementary Materials: Evaluation of Cytotoxicity and Α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity of Amide and Polyamino-Derivatives of Lupane Triterpenoids
    Supplementary Materials: Evaluation of cytotoxicity and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity of amide and polyamino-derivatives of lupane triterpenoids Oxana B. Kazakova1*, Gul'nara V. Giniyatullina1, Akhat G. Mustafin1, Denis A. Babkov2, Elena V. Sokolova2, Alexander A. Spasov2* 1Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 71, pr. Oktyabrya, 450054 Ufa, Russian Federation 2Scientific Center for Innovative Drugs, Volgograd State Medical University, Novorossiyskaya st. 39, Volgograd 400087, Russian Federation Correspondence Prof. Dr. Oxana B. Kazakova Ufa Institute of Chemistry of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences 71 Prospeсt Oktyabrya Ufa, 450054 Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] Prof. Dr. Alexander A. Spasov Scientific Center for Innovative Drugs of the Volgograd State Medical University 39 Novorossiyskaya st. Volgograd, 400087 Russian Federation E-mail: [email protected] Figure S1. 1H and 13C of compound 2. H NH N H O H O H 2 2 Figure S2. 1H and 13C of compound 4. NH2 O H O H CH3 O O H H3C O H 4 3 Figure S3. Anticancer screening data of compound 2 at single dose assay 4 Figure S4. Anticancer screening data of compound 7 at single dose assay 5 Figure S5. Anticancer screening data of compound 8 at single dose assay 6 Figure S6. Anticancer screening data of compound 9 at single dose assay 7 Figure S7. Anticancer screening data of compound 12 at single dose assay 8 Figure S8. Anticancer screening data of compound 13 at single dose assay 9 Figure S9. Anticancer screening data of compound 14 at single dose assay 10 Figure S10.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Characterization of the Human Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 3 Protein Complex by Mass Spectrometry*□S
    Supplemental Material can be found at: http://www.mcponline.org/cgi/content/full/M600399-MCP200 /DC1 Research Structural Characterization of the Human Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 3 Protein Complex by Mass Spectrometry*□S Eugen Damoc‡, Christopher S. Fraser§, Min Zhou¶, Hortense Videler¶, Greg L. Mayeurʈ, John W. B. Hersheyʈ, Jennifer A. Doudna§, Carol V. Robinson¶**, and Julie A. Leary‡ ‡‡ Protein synthesis in mammalian cells requires initiation The initiation phase of eukaryotic protein synthesis involves factor eIF3, an ϳ800-kDa protein complex that plays a formation of an 80 S ribosomal complex containing the initi- Downloaded from central role in binding of initiator methionyl-tRNA and ator methionyl-tRNAi bound to the initiation codon in the mRNA to the 40 S ribosomal subunit to form the 48 S mRNA. This is a multistep process promoted by proteins initiation complex. The eIF3 complex also prevents pre- called eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs).1 Currently at least 12 mature association of the 40 and 60 S ribosomal subunits eIFs, composed of at least 29 distinct subunits, have been and interacts with other initiation factors involved in start identified (1). Mammalian eIF3, the largest initiation factor, is a codon selection. The molecular mechanisms by which multisubunit complex with an apparent molecular mass of www.mcponline.org eIF3 exerts these functions are poorly understood. Since ϳ800 kDa. This protein complex plays an essential role in its initial characterization in the 1970s, the exact size, translation by binding directly to the 40 S ribosomal subunit composition, and post-translational modifications of and promoting formation of the 43 S preinitiation complex ⅐ ⅐ mammalian eIF3 have not been rigorously determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomics Provides Insights Into the Inhibition of Chinese Hamster V79
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Proteomics provides insights into the inhibition of Chinese hamster V79 cell proliferation in the deep underground environment Jifeng Liu1,2, Tengfei Ma1,2, Mingzhong Gao3, Yilin Liu4, Jun Liu1, Shichao Wang2, Yike Xie2, Ling Wang2, Juan Cheng2, Shixi Liu1*, Jian Zou1,2*, Jiang Wu2, Weimin Li2 & Heping Xie2,3,5 As resources in the shallow depths of the earth exhausted, people will spend extended periods of time in the deep underground space. However, little is known about the deep underground environment afecting the health of organisms. Hence, we established both deep underground laboratory (DUGL) and above ground laboratory (AGL) to investigate the efect of environmental factors on organisms. Six environmental parameters were monitored in the DUGL and AGL. Growth curves were recorded and tandem mass tag (TMT) proteomics analysis were performed to explore the proliferative ability and diferentially abundant proteins (DAPs) in V79 cells (a cell line widely used in biological study in DUGLs) cultured in the DUGL and AGL. Parallel Reaction Monitoring was conducted to verify the TMT results. γ ray dose rate showed the most detectable diference between the two laboratories, whereby γ ray dose rate was signifcantly lower in the DUGL compared to the AGL. V79 cell proliferation was slower in the DUGL. Quantitative proteomics detected 980 DAPs (absolute fold change ≥ 1.2, p < 0.05) between V79 cells cultured in the DUGL and AGL. Of these, 576 proteins were up-regulated and 404 proteins were down-regulated in V79 cells cultured in the DUGL. KEGG pathway analysis revealed that seven pathways (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Genes with 5' Terminal Oligopyrimidine Tracts Preferentially Escape Global Suppression of Translation by the SARS-Cov-2 NSP1 Protein
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Genes with 5′ terminal oligopyrimidine tracts preferentially escape global suppression of translation by the SARS-CoV-2 Nsp1 protein Shilpa Raoa, Ian Hoskinsa, Tori Tonna, P. Daniela Garciaa, Hakan Ozadama, Elif Sarinay Cenika, Can Cenika,1 a Department of Molecular Biosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA 1Corresponding author: [email protected] Key words: SARS-CoV-2, Nsp1, MeTAFlow, translation, ribosome profiling, RNA-Seq, 5′ TOP, Ribo-Seq, gene expression 1 Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Abstract Viruses rely on the host translation machinery to synthesize their own proteins. Consequently, they have evolved varied mechanisms to co-opt host translation for their survival. SARS-CoV-2 relies on a non-structural protein, Nsp1, for shutting down host translation. However, it is currently unknown how viral proteins and host factors critical for viral replication can escape a global shutdown of host translation. Here, using a novel FACS-based assay called MeTAFlow, we report a dose-dependent reduction in both nascent protein synthesis and mRNA abundance in cells expressing Nsp1. We perform RNA-Seq and matched ribosome profiling experiments to identify gene-specific changes both at the mRNA expression and translation level. We discover that a functionally-coherent subset of human genes are preferentially translated in the context of Nsp1 expression. These genes include the translation machinery components, RNA binding proteins, and others important for viral pathogenicity. Importantly, we uncovered a remarkable enrichment of 5′ terminal oligo-pyrimidine (TOP) tracts among preferentially translated genes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Yeast Eif3 Subunits TIF32/A, NIP1/C, and Eif5 Make Critical Connections with the 40Sribosome in Vivo
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 6, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press The yeast eIF3 subunits TIF32/a, NIP1/c, and eIF5 make critical connections with the 40Sribosome in vivo Leoš Valášek, Amy A. Mathew, Byung-Sik Shin, Klaus H. Nielsen, Béla Szamecz, and Alan G. Hinnebusch1 Laboratory of Gene Regulation and Development, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA Initiation factor 3 (eIF3) forms a multifactor complex (MFC) with eIF1, eIF2, and eIF5 that stimulates Met Met-tRNAi binding to 40Sribosomes and promotes scanning or AUG recognition. We have previously characterized MFC subcomplexes produced in vivo from affinity-tagged eIF3 subunits lacking discrete binding domains for other MFC components. Here we asked whether these subcomplexes can bind to 40Sribosomes in vivo. We found that the N- and C-terminal domains of NIP1/eIF3c, the N- and C-terminal domains of TIF32/eIF3a, and eIF5 have critical functions in 40Sbinding, with eIF5 an d the TIF32-CTD performing redundant functions. The TIF32-CTD interacted in vitro with helices 16–18 of domain I in 18SrRNA, and the TIF32-NTD and NIP1 interacted with 40Sprotein RPS0A.These results sugge st that eIF3 binds to the solvent side of the 40Ssubunit in a way that provides access to the interface side fo r the two eIF3 segments Met (NIP1-NTD and TIF32-CTD) that interact with eIF1, eIF5, and the eIF2/GTP/Met-tRNAi ternary complex. [Keywords: Eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF); multifactor complex (MFC); translational control; protein synthesis; 40S ribosome binding; TIF32/NIP1] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Resistance to Drugs and Cell Death in Cancer Stem Cells (Cscs)
    Journal of Translational Science Review Article ISSN: 2059-268X Resistance to drugs and cell death in cancer stem cells (CSCs) Ahmad R Safa* Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA Abstract Human cancers emerge from cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are resistant to cancer chemotherapeutic agents, radiation, and cell death. Moreover, autophagy provides the cytoprotective effect which contributes to drug resistance in these cells. Furthermore, much evidence shows that CSCs cause tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and cancer recurrence. Various signaling pathways including the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK), NOTCH1, and Wnt/β-catenin as well as the CSC markers maintain CSC properties. Several mechanisms including overexpression of ABC multidrug resistance transporters, a deficiency in mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis, upregulation of c-FLIP, overexpression of anti- apoptotic Bcl-2 family members and inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs), and PI3K/AKT signaling contribute to enhancing resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and cell death induction in CSCs in various cancers. Studying such pathways may help provide detailed understanding of CSC mechanisms of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and apoptosis and may lead to the development of effective therapeutics to eradicate CSCs. Abbreviations: Apaf-1: Apoptotic Proteinase-Activating Factor-1; Tumor recurrence is the major cause of death in patients with AIC: Apoptosis Inhibitory Complex; BH3: Bcl-2 Homology Domain-3; incurable malignancies and is attributed to treatment-resistant CSCs CSCs: Cancer Stem Cells; c-FLIP: cellular FLICE (FADD-like IL- within the primary tumor (Figure 2). CSCs are a rare cell population 1β-converting enzyme)-Inhibitory Protein; DISC: Death-Inducing within a tumor, which express differing molecular markers in various Signaling Complex; DNA-PK: DNA-Dependent Protein Kinase; FADD: types of cancers [1,2,4].
    [Show full text]
  • GPRC5A Suppresses Protein Synthesis at the Endoplasmic Reticulum to Prevent Radiation-Induced Lung Tumorigenesis
    ARTICLE Received 8 Mar 2016 | Accepted 28 Apr 2016 | Published 8 Jun 2016 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms11795 OPEN GPRC5A suppresses protein synthesis at the endoplasmic reticulum to prevent radiation-induced lung tumorigenesis Jian Wang1, Alton B. Farris2, Kaiming Xu1, Ping Wang1, Xiangming Zhang1, Duc M. Duong3, Hong Yi4, Hui-Kuo Shu1, Shi-Yong Sun5 & Ya Wang1 GPRC5A functions as a lung tumour suppressor to prevent spontaneous and environmentally induced lung carcinogenesis; however, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here we reveal that GPRC5A at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane suppresses synthesis of the secreted or membrane-bound proteins including a number of oncogenes, the most important one being Egfr. The ER-located GPRC5A disturbs the assembly of the eIF4F-mediated translation initiation complex on the mRNA cap through directly binding to the eIF4F complex with its two middle extracellular loops. Particularly, suppression of EGFR by GPRC5A contributes significantly to preventing ionizing radiation (IR)-induced lung tumorigenesis. Thus, GPRC5A deletion enhances IR-promoted EGFR expression through an increased translation rate, thereby significantly increasing lung tumour incidence in Gprc5a À / À mice. Our findings indicate that under-expressed GPRC5A during lung tumor- igenesis enhances any transcriptional stimulation through an active translational status, which can be used to control oncogene expression and potentially the resulting related disease. 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine and the Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. 2 Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine and the Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA. 3 Emory Integrated Proteomics Core and Biochemistry Department, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1. in Vitro Side Effect Profiling Study for LDN/OSU-0212320. Neurotransmitter Related Steroids
    Supplementary Table 1. In vitro side effect profiling study for LDN/OSU-0212320. Percent Inhibition Receptor 10 µM Neurotransmitter Related Adenosine, Non-selective 7.29% Adrenergic, Alpha 1, Non-selective 24.98% Adrenergic, Alpha 2, Non-selective 27.18% Adrenergic, Beta, Non-selective -20.94% Dopamine Transporter 8.69% Dopamine, D1 (h) 8.48% Dopamine, D2s (h) 4.06% GABA A, Agonist Site -16.15% GABA A, BDZ, alpha 1 site 12.73% GABA-B 13.60% Glutamate, AMPA Site (Ionotropic) 12.06% Glutamate, Kainate Site (Ionotropic) -1.03% Glutamate, NMDA Agonist Site (Ionotropic) 0.12% Glutamate, NMDA, Glycine (Stry-insens Site) 9.84% (Ionotropic) Glycine, Strychnine-sensitive 0.99% Histamine, H1 -5.54% Histamine, H2 16.54% Histamine, H3 4.80% Melatonin, Non-selective -5.54% Muscarinic, M1 (hr) -1.88% Muscarinic, M2 (h) 0.82% Muscarinic, Non-selective, Central 29.04% Muscarinic, Non-selective, Peripheral 0.29% Nicotinic, Neuronal (-BnTx insensitive) 7.85% Norepinephrine Transporter 2.87% Opioid, Non-selective -0.09% Opioid, Orphanin, ORL1 (h) 11.55% Serotonin Transporter -3.02% Serotonin, Non-selective 26.33% Sigma, Non-Selective 10.19% Steroids Estrogen 11.16% 1 Percent Inhibition Receptor 10 µM Testosterone (cytosolic) (h) 12.50% Ion Channels Calcium Channel, Type L (Dihydropyridine Site) 43.18% Calcium Channel, Type N 4.15% Potassium Channel, ATP-Sensitive -4.05% Potassium Channel, Ca2+ Act., VI 17.80% Potassium Channel, I(Kr) (hERG) (h) -6.44% Sodium, Site 2 -0.39% Second Messengers Nitric Oxide, NOS (Neuronal-Binding) -17.09% Prostaglandins Leukotriene,
    [Show full text]
  • The P90 RSK Family Members: Common Functions and Isoform Specificity
    Published OnlineFirst August 22, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4448 Cancer Review Research The p90 RSK Family Members: Common Functions and Isoform Specificity Romain Lara, Michael J. Seckl, and Olivier E. Pardo Abstract The p90 ribosomal S6 kinases (RSK) are implicated in various cellular processes, including cell proliferation, survival, migration, and invasion. In cancer, RSKs modulate cell transformation, tumorigenesis, and metastasis. Indeed, changes in the expression of RSK isoforms have been reported in several malignancies, including breast, prostate, and lung cancers. Four RSK isoforms have been identified in humans on the basis of their high degree of sequence homology. Although this similarity suggests some functional redundancy between these proteins, an increasing body of evidence supports the existence of isoform-based specificity among RSKs in mediating particular cellular processes. This review briefly presents the similarities between RSK family members before focusing on the specific function of each of the isoforms and their involvement in cancer progression. Cancer Res; 73(17); 1–8. Ó2013 AACR. Introduction subsequently cloned throughout the Metazoan kingdom (2). The extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK)1/2 pathway The genomic analysis of several cancer types suggests that fi is involved in key cellular processes, including cell prolifera- these genes are not frequently ampli ed or mutated, with some tion, differentiation, survival, metabolism, and migration. notable exceptions (e.g., in the case of hepatocellular carcino- More than 30% of all human cancers harbor mutations within ma; ref. 6). Table 1 summarizes reported genetic changes in this pathway, mostly resulting in gain of function and conse- RSK genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematically Profiling the Expression of Eif3 Subunits in Glioma Reveals
    Chai et al. Cancer Cell Int (2019) 19:155 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12935-019-0867-1 Cancer Cell International PRIMARY RESEARCH Open Access Systematically profling the expression of eIF3 subunits in glioma reveals the expression of eIF3i has prognostic value in IDH-mutant lower grade glioma Rui‑Chao Chai1,4,6†, Ning Wang2†, Yu‑Zhou Chang3, Ke‑Nan Zhang1,6, Jing‑Jun Li1,6, Jun‑Jie Niu5, Fan Wu1,6*, Yu‑Qing Liu1,6* and Yong‑Zhi Wang1,3,4,6* Abstract Background: Abnormal expression of the eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) subunits plays critical roles in tumo‑ rigenesis and progression, and also has potential prognostic value in cancers. However, the expression and clinical implications of eIF3 subunits in glioma remain unknown. Methods: Expression data of eIF3 for patients with gliomas were obtained from the Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) (n 272) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n 595). Cox regression, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves= and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used to study= the prognostic value. Gene oncology (GO) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) were utilized for functional prediction. Results: In both the CGGA and TCGA datasets, the expression levels of eIF3d, eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3h and eIF3l highly were associated with the IDH mutant status of gliomas. The expression of eIF3b, eIF3i, eIF3k and eIF3m was increased with the tumor grade, and was associated with poorer overall survival [All Hazard ratio (HR) > 1 and P < 0.05]. By contrast, the expression of eIF3a and eIF3l was decreased in higher grade gliomas and was associated with better overall sur‑ vival (Both HR < 1 and P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • The J-Subunit of Human Translation Initiation Factor Eif3 Is Required for the Stable Binding of Eif3 and Its Subcomplexes to 40 S Ribosomal Subunits in Vitro*
    THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY Vol. 279, No. 10, Issue of March 5, pp. 8946–8956, 2004 © 2004 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. The j-Subunit of Human Translation Initiation Factor eIF3 Is Required for the Stable Binding of eIF3 and Its Subcomplexes to 40 S Ribosomal Subunits in Vitro* Received for publication, November 21, 2003, and in revised form, December 18, 2003 Published, JBC Papers in Press, December 19, 2003, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M312745200 Christopher S. Fraser‡, Jennifer Y. Lee, Greg L. Mayeur, Martin Bushell§, Jennifer A. Doudna¶, and John W. B. Hersheyʈ From the Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 95616 Eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) is a 12-subunit protein subunits, named in order of decreasing molecular protein complex that plays a central role in binding of weight as recommended (4): eIF3a, eIF3b, eIF3c, eIF3d, eIF3l, initiator methionyl-tRNA and mRNA to the 40 S riboso- eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3g, eIF3h, eIF3i, eIF3j, and eIF3k (5, 6). Spe- mal subunit to form the 40 S initiation complex. The cific functions for mammalian eIF3 have been identified by a molecular mechanisms by which eIF3 exerts these func- variety of in vitro experiments. It binds directly to 40 S ribo- tions are poorly understood. To learn more about the somal subunits in the absence of other initiation components structure and function of eIF3 we have expressed and (1), and affects the association/dissociation of ribosomes (7–10). purified individual human eIF3 subunits or complexes It promotes the binding of Met-tRNA and mRNA to the 40 S of eIF3 subunits using baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Translation Initiation Factor Eif3h Targets Specific Transcripts To
    Translation initiation factor eIF3h targets specific transcripts to polysomes during embryogenesis Avik Choudhuria,b, Umadas Maitraa,1, and Todd Evansb,1 aDepartment of Developmental and Molecular Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461; and bDepartment of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065 Edited by Igor B. Dawid, The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, and approved April 30, 2013 (received for review February 14, 2013) Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) plays a central role eukaryotes. These—eIF3d, eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3h, eIF3j, eIF3k, in translation initiation and consists of five core (conserved) sub- eIF3l, and eIF3m—were designated “non-core” subunits (4). units present in both budding yeast and higher eukaryotes. Higher In contrast to the budding yeast, the genome of the fission eukaryotic eIF3 contains additional (noncore or nonconserved) yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe contains structural homologs subunits of poorly defined function, including sub-unit h (eIF3h), of at least five noncore (nonconserved) eIF3 subunits—eIF3d, which in zebrafish is encoded by two distinct genes (eif3ha and eIF3e, eIF3f, eIF3h, and eIF3m. The gene encoding eIF3f is eif3hb). Previously we showed that eif3ha encodes the predominant essential for growth, whereas eIF3d, eIF3e, and eIF3h are dis- isoform during zebrafish embryogenesis and that depletion of this pensable for growth and viability (5–11). However, deleted factor causes defects in the development of the brain and eyes. To strains show specific phenotypes including defects in meiosis/ investigate the molecular mechanism governing this regulation, we sporulation (6, 9, 11).
    [Show full text]