DOCSLIB.ORG

Changing Publishing Ecologies: a Landscape Study of New University

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Changing Publishing Ecologies: a Landscape Study of New University University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln 6-6-2017 Changing Publishing Ecologies: A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic- Led Publishing: A Report to JISC Janneke Adema Coventry University, [email protected] Graham Stone JISC, [email protected] Chris Keene JISC, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom Part of the Book and Paper Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons, Modern Literature Commons, Reading and Language Commons, Scholarly Communication Commons, and the Scholarly Publishing Commons Adema, Janneke; Stone, Graham; and Keene, Chris, "Changing Publishing Ecologies: A Landscape Study of New University Presses and Academic-Led Publishing: A Report to JISC" (2017). Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc.. 80. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/80 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Libraries at University of Nebraska-Lincoln at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc. by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Changing publishing ecologies A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing A report to Jisc by Janneke Adema and Graham Stone, with an introduction by Chris Keene © Jisc Published under the CC BY 4.0 licence creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Changing publishing ecologies A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................................4 1.2 Aims and objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.0 Literature review ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Setting the scene: university presses ........................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Open access presses ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Institutinal repositories as ‘publishers’ .......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 The library as publisher .................................................................................................................................8 2.5 Publishing services ....................................................................................................................................... 9 2.6 Developing a library publishing network ...................................................................................................... 9 2.7 Journal publishing ....................................................................................................................................... 10 2.8 Monograph publishing ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.9 Academic-led presses ................................................................................................................................. 11 3.0 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 13 4.0 New University Presses: results and evaluation .......................................................................................... 14 4.1 Section A. Opening questions ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.2 Section B. Established New University Presses ........................................................................................... 17 4.3 Section C. Planned New University Presses ................................................................................................ 30 4.4 Section D. Closing questions ....................................................................................................................... 38 5.0 Academic-Led Presses: results and evaluation ............................................................................................ 42 5.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 42 5.2 Part 1. Background, motivations and goals ................................................................................................. 43 5.3 Part 2. Overview of your press.....................................................................................................................49 5.4 Support required ......................................................................................................................................... 65 6.0 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................................ 77 6.1 Introduction: support for the sector ............................................................................................................ 77 6.2 Shared publishing platform ........................................................................................................................ 79 6.3 Best practice toolkit .................................................................................................................................... 79 7.0 References .................................................................................................................................................... 81 Appendix 1. NUP survey questions ................................................................................................................... 86 Appendix 2. ALP interview protocol ................................................................................................................. 96 Appendix 3. Short descriptions of Academic-Led Presses ................................................................................ 98 Appendix 4. Existing New University Presses .................................................................................................. 101 2 Changing publishing ecologies A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing Introduction A new wave of university presses is emerging. Common characteristics are that they are open access (OA), digital first, library-based, and they often offer a smaller set of services than a traditional publisher, blurring the line between publisher and platform. In tandem, a small but notable number of academics and researchers have set up their own publishing initiatives, often demonstrating an innovative or unique approach either in workflow, peer review, technology or business model. These new publishing initiatives have a potentially disruptive effect on the scholarly communication environment, providing new avenues for the dissemination of research outputs and acting as pathfinders for the evolution of academic publishing and the scholarly record. In this report, we have captured the current landscape of new university presses (NUPs) and academic-led presses (ALPs) emerging within the UK. Taking different approaches for these two types of press we have captured the take-up, reasoning and characteristics of these initiatives, as well as future plans. The report concludes with a series of recommendations to help support and foster new developments in this space, to share best practice and collaboration and to identify the tools and services that will facilitate further innovation. Jisc supports universities and researchers in the provision of new digital services and innovation. We will work with the community and stakeholders to decide how we can take forward some of the recommendations listed in this report for the benefit of our members and the research community. 3 Changing publishing ecologies A landscape study of new university presses and academic-led publishing 1.1 Background In 2014, Jisc published the national monograph strategy1, setting out a high-level roadmap to support the future of the monograph. The roadmap called for experimentation around platforms and business models. Likewise, the OAPEN-UK project final report highlighted that: “Experimentation and change will be a feature of the open access monographs environment for some time. It is important that stakeholders understand how their innovations play out in practice, to inform future development." New university presses and scholarly publishing in the library are increasingly playing an important role in the shift of scholarly communications. The US-based Library Publishing Coalition defines these new library-led presses as a “set of activities led by college and university libraries to support the creation, dissemination, and curation of scholarly, creative,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book Self-Publishing Best Practices
    Montana Tech Library Digital Commons @ Montana Tech Graduate Theses & Non-Theses Student Scholarship Fall 2019 Book Self-Publishing Best Practices Erica Jansma Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.mtech.edu/grad_rsch Part of the Communication Commons Book Self-Publishing Best Practices by Erica Jansma A project submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of M.S. Technical Communication Montana Tech 2019 ii Abstract I have taken a manuscript through the book publishing process to produce a camera-ready print book and e-book. This includes copyediting, designing layout templates, laying out the document in InDesign, and producing an index. My research is focused on the best practices and standards for publishing. Lessons learned from my research and experience include layout best practices, particularly linespacing and alignment guidelines, as well as the limitations and capabilities of InDesign, particularly its endnote functionality. Based on the results of this project, I can recommend self-publishers to understand the software and distribution platforms prior to publishing a book to ensure the required specifications are met to avoid complications later in the process. This document provides details on many of the software, distribution, and design options available for self-publishers to consider. Keywords: self-publishing, publishing, books, ebooks, book design, layout iii Dedication I dedicate this project to both of my grandmothers. I grew up watching you work hard, sacrifice, trust, and love with everything you have; it was beautiful; you are beautiful; and I hope I can model your example with a fraction of your grace and fruitfulness. Thank you for loving me so well.
    [Show full text]
  • Antiquarian Medical Book Dealers: a Survey
    Newsletter of the Archivists and Librarians In the Volume XIX, Number 1 History of the Health Sciences Winter, 1994 ANTIQUARIAN MEDICAL BOOK DEALERS: A SURVEY Introduction from the United States. Information about each business appears in another section of this newslet­ In 1987, a survey and directory of medical rare ter. The dealers were also asked to give a few book dealers in the United States prepared by Judith comments about how the market for historical or Overmier was published in The Watermark. A rare health sciences materials is changing or has second survey of dealers appeared in the Winter, changed in the last couple years. This question was 1990 issue of The Watermark. In the intervening asked to continue the discussion of antiquarian four years dealers have moved, shops have closed, bookselling which was prepared by Barbara Irwin and new dealers have begun selling printed materi­ and Dov Front for the 13 April 1992 issue of AB als, photographs, instruments, and other artifacts of Bookman's Weekly. The dealers' comments are sum­ interest to our members. This survey is an attempt marized into several categories below. I have not to update the 1990 directory. Dealers from the quoted any specific dealer and have not added my United States, Canada, and England are listed, own opinions. I offer this summary so everyone including a few whose inventory is not primarily developing collections can evaluate the comments in printed texts in the health sciences. the light of their own collections. The Houston Academy ofMedicine-Texas Medi­ Comments on the ''High-End" Market cal Center Library's experience has been that physi­ cians and other health care professionals conducting Continued inflation for the high spots..
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Findable, Impactful, Citable, Usable, Sustainable (FICUS): a Heuristic for Digital Publishing Nicky Agate, Cheryl E
    K EDITED BY VIRGINIA KUHN AND ANKE FINGER SHAPING THE DIGITAL DISSERTATION UHN KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES AN D F EDITED BY VIRGINIA KUHN AND ANKE FINGER INGER SHAPING THE DIGITAL Digital dissertations have been a part of academic research for years now, yet there are ( E still many questions surrounding their processes. Are interactive dissertations significantly DS ISSERTATION different from their paper-based counterparts? What are the effects of digital projects on ) D doctoral education? How does one choose and defend a digital dissertation? This book explores the wider implications of digital scholarship across institutional, geographic, and disciplinary divides. The volume is arranged in two sections: the first, written by senior scholars, addresses conceptual concerns regarding the direction and assessment of digital dissertations in KNOWLEDGE PRODUCTION IN THE the broader context of doctoral education. The second section consists of case studies by PhD students whose research resulted in a natively digital dissertation that they have S HAPING successfully defended. These early-career researchers have been selected to represent a ARTS AND HUMANITIES range of disciplines and institutions. Despite the profound effect of incorporated digital tools on dissertations, the literature concerning them is limited. This volume aims to provide a fresh, up-to-date view on the THE digital dissertation, considering the newest technological advances. It is especially relevant in the European context where digital dissertations, mostly in arts-based research, are D more popular. Shaping the Digital Dissertation aims to provide insights, precedents and best practices to IGITAL graduate students, doctoral advisors, institutional agents, and dissertation committees.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review Editor
    Recent Publications JAMES N. GREEN, BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Rare Books & Manuscripts Librarianship reviews books, annual reports, new periodicals, and occasional book and auction catalogues pertaining directly and indirectly to the fields of rare books librarianship, manuscript curatorship, and archives management. Publishers, librarians, and archivists are asked to send appro· priate publications for review or notice to the book review editor. Books are occasionally received which are not strictly witin the limited scope chosen for this Book Review section, but which might nevertheless be of interest to readers of RBML. In future issues such books will be noted as Books Received, whenever the list grows long enough to warrant publication. Books or publication announcements should be sent to the book review editor: James N. Green, Library Company of Philadelphia, 1314 Locust Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107-5698; (215) 546-3181. REVIEWS seeped away from Philadelphia. One wag Wolfe, Richard J, Marbled Paper: Its suggested the large number of slides History, Techniques, and Pattems with intentionally prOvided cover under which Special Reference to the Relationship those with trains to catch could slip away of Marbling to Bookbinding in Europe in relative obSCUrity. Some who attended and the Western World. Philadelphia: the lectures may therefore doubtitpossible, The University of Pennsylvania Press, but this monumental book expands as 1990. 245p. $95.00. ISBN 0-8122-8188- well as records Wolfe's lectures. 8. Monumental it is: 192 double-column As Richard J. Wolfe's 1981 A.S.W. pages, almost nine inches by twelve, follow Rosenbach Fellowship lectures prog­ a brief preface and acknowledgements. ressed, word of their length and denSity The text, in tum, is followed by 35 pages James N.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Scholarly Monograph's Descendants,” Mary M. Case, Ed., T
    Association of Research Libraries (ARL®) Clifford A. Lynch, “The Scholarly Monograph’s Descendants,” Mary M. Case, ed., The Specialized Scholarly Monograph in Crisis, or How Can I Get Tenure if You Won’t Publish My Book? (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries, 1999), pp. 137‐148. The Scholarly Monograph's Descendants Clifford Lynch, Executive Director, Coalition for Networked Information Introduction This paper looks at the possible evolutionary paths that the current printed scholarly monograph may take, paying particular attention to the ways in which technical, economic, and cultural factors may shape this evolution. It does not predict the demise of today's printed scholarly monograph, but suggests that it will coexist with a series of successors that will offer new points of balance among technical and economic constraints and opportunities and that will provide authors with new ways in which to communicate their research. For some works and purposes, the new forms will be superior; in other cases, the traditional printed monograph will likely remain the preferred form. I begin with a brief examination of the current state of the scholarly journal in its transition to electronic formats–or at least to electronic distribution. This transition is arguably more advanced and taking place on a broader scale than is the evolution of the monograph, and thus it may offer insights into what we can expect for the monograph. At the same time, I will argue that much of the experience with the journal may be misleading when extrapolated directly to the future of the monograph. I have chosen words carefully: I believe that what is happening to the journal is best described as a transition or migration, while what we will see with the monograph is the evolution of digitally based successor genres that will coexist with the current print monograph.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Read a Historical Monograph Like a Historian October 2018 Gks & Jr
    How to Read a Historical Monograph Like a Historian October 2018 gks & jr 1. Start with a BOOK REVIEW Professional historians do all the time. If you want to know a book well-for a discussion or for a research project-the book review is of course no substitute for reading the book. But a good book review will help you to understand the significance of the book you are going to read, its argument, its place in a broader conversation that has been going on. Book reviews have never been so easy to find and access. For a simple search, you might use JSTOR, a vast archive of scholarly journals. It contains the full text of journals running from their first year of publication up to a five years ago. To use JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org, accessible on campus), enter the title you'd like to search for, scroll down and check the box that says history journals, scroll down further and check the box that says reviews, then click on search. Other useful sources: Academic Search Premier, Historical Abstracts, American History and Life, H-Net Reviews. Of course, you have to read book reviews (as all else) with a critical eye. Reviewers, you will see, often disagree about the value of a book, an approach, or an argument. 2. Read the INTRODUCTION very carefully Ask yourself the following questions: * What historical problem is the author addressing? * Are there other interpretations (the work of other historians) that the author finds lacking? Why? * What evidence (what sources) is the author going to examine? * What questions is the author asking about the subject? * What are the answers to these questions? * What is the thesis of the book? All of these questions should be answered in the introduction.
    [Show full text]
  • The Envisioning a World Beyond Apcs/Bpcs International Symposium Was Held at the University of Kansas on November 17 & 18, 2016
    The Envisioning a World Beyond APCs/BPCs international symposium was held at the University of Kansas on November 17 & 18, 2016. More information, including recordings of the opening session and participant biographies is available at https://openaccess.ku.edu/symposium. ​ Apollo 13 Assignment: As a culminating component of the Envisioning a World Beyond APCs/BPCs ​ international symposium, on the morning of Friday, Nov. 18, participants were asked to form teams and then develop a proposal for a publishing regime that will: ● present a solution that is free for readers and for authors; ● work in the local context and create partnerships that incorporate a variety of global situations, including those individuals and groups marginalized by historical, political, and economic power structures; ● address barriers to or opportunities for authors (i.e., the focus should be on the creators of the work, rather thans on the producers or user); ● present an agenda for action; ● envision a 5- to 10-year transition that includes universities as the major stakeholder in a knowledge production and sharing environment that will benefit all readers and authors. The following are three proposals that came out of the Friday morning session (which were further developed in the weeks immediately following the symposium). Proposal 1: Title Global Knowledge Commons 2025 Team Members Kathleen Shearer, Ivy Anderson, Jean Claude Guédon, Heather Joseph, Rebecca Kennison, David Shulenburger Vision Academic institutions and research organizations are the foundation of a global knowledge commons in which institutions collect the content created by their 1 communities, make it openly available, and connect globally through the adoption of common standards.
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Literature
    Children's Literature Handbooks Carpenter, H., & Prichard, M. (1984). The oxford companion to children's literature. Oxford Oxfordshire ; New York: Oxford University Press. Dictionary of literary biography. Detroit, Mich: Gale Research Co. v. 42: American writers for children before 1900 v. 52: American writers for children since 1960: fiction v. 62: American writers for children since 1960: poets, illustrators, and nonfiction authors v. 141: British children's wirters, 1880 - 1914 v. 160: British children's writers, 1914 - 1960 v. 161: British childrne's writers, since 1960 v. 163: British children's writers, 1800 - 1880 Fisher, M. T. (1975). Who's who in children's books. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Harris, L. L., Gale Research Company, & Gale Research Inc. Nineteenth-Century Literature Criticism, , Irregular; Vol. 1. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (2002). Dictionary of american children's fiction, 1995-1999 : Books of recognized merit. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (1996). Dictionary of american children's fiction, 1990-1994 : Books of recognized merit. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (1993). Dictionary of american children's fiction, 1985-1989 : Books of recognized merit. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (1989). Dictionary of british children's fiction : Books of recognized merit. New York: Greenwood Press. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (1986). Dictionary of american children's fiction, 1960-1984 : Recent books of recognized merit. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. Helbig, A., & Perkins, A. (1985). Dictionary of american children's fiction, 1859-1959 : Books of recognized merit. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press. Opie, I. A., & Opie, P. (1997). The oxford dictionary of nursery rhymes (New ed.).
    [Show full text]
  • The Victorian Book Review in the New Media Moment
    Reading in Review: The Victorian Book Review in the New Media Moment Elizabeth Carolyn Miller Victorian Periodicals Review, Volume 49, Number 4, Winter 2016, pp. 626-642 (Article) Published by Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/vpr.2016.0042 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/644186 Access provided by University of California, Davis (4 Jan 2017 21:51 GMT) Reading in Review: The Victorian Book Review in the New Media Moment ELIZABETH CAROLYN MILLER This article revisits the nineteenth-century book review as a genre that naturalized new reading practices for a new media moment. As Lisa Gitel- man has influentially argued, “New media are less points of epistemic rup- ture than they are socially embedded sites for the ongoing negotiation of meaning,” and indeed, while print was not historically “new” in the nine- teenth century, it was nevertheless experiencing a new media moment.1 With the acutely steep rise of published periodicals in this period, not to mention concomitant rises in the number of published newspapers and books, the nearly incalculable volume of new print material made for a qualitative, not just quantitative, shift in the identity of print as a medium.2 The book review, as a genre, demonstrates with particular clarity how the print medium was changing, and it suggests how nineteenth-century read- ing practices were adapting in conjunction with the medium. Aimed at audiences that could never hope to encounter the sublimity of new print material directly, the book review emerged as a meta-genre for nineteenth- century print, one that reflected the changing identity of the book within a broader print culture.
    [Show full text]
  • The Digital Monograph
    DigitCult | Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures An Emerging Scholarly Form: The Digital Monograph Massimo Riva Department of Italian Studies Brown University Abstract Two recent initiatives, in the English-speaking world, are currently promoting monograph publishing in digital formats, with a specific focus on the arts and humanities but also including the social sciences. The American initiative is funded by the Andrew W. Mellon foundation; in the U.K., the Arts and Humanities Research Council has also promoted a similar initiative, the Academic Book of the Future, which produced a final report released in Spring 2017. This article describes some of the challenges and opportunities the author and his team are facing in designing a digital monograph on eighteenth and nineteenth-century visual culture, one of two pilot projects of the Brown University library Digital Publishing Initiative, funded by the Mellon foundation. Published 28 December 2017 Correspondence should be addressed to Massimo Riva, Brown University, 190 Hope St., Providence, Rhode Island 02912, USA. Email: [email protected] DigitCult, Scientific Journal on Digital Cultures is an academic journal of international scope, peer-reviewed and open access, aiming to value international research and to present current debate on digital culture, technological innovation and social change. ISSN: 2531-5994. URL: http://www.digitcult.it Copyright rests with the authors. This work is released under a Creative Commons Attribution (IT) Licence, version 3.0. For details please see http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by/3.0/it/ DigitCult 63 http://dx.doi.org/10.4399/97888255099087 2017, Vol. 2, Iss. 3, 63–74. DOI: 10.4399/97888255099087 64 | An Emerging Scholarly Form: The Digital Monograph doi:10.4399/97888255099087 Two Initiatives Two recent initiatives, in the English-speaking world, are currently promoting monograph publishing in digital formats, with a specific focus on the arts and humanities but also including the social sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph Or Anthology
    Register a monograph or an anthology You need to Be logged in Menu path See the next page for a more detailed description Research results/NVI Register result Select ‘Book’ Select sub-category Register author Register title Register publisher Register the year of publication, whether the book has been revised, the number of pages, and the NPI scientific field Save Picture guide Click on the main menu ‘Research results/NVI’ and sub-menu ‘Register results’. Select ‘Book’ under main category. You will see this form: Choose the appropriate sub-category. A monograph is a book in which all chapters are written by the same author(s). An anthology is a collection of texts with different authors and it usually has one or more editors. If you have written a chapter of a book that you want to register, you will have to register the book itself as an anthology first, and then the chapters can be linked to the anthology once they are registered. Register author(s) or editors Once you have selected a category, add the authors or editors of the book. For anthologies, first select the role of the person in question (editor, author or editorial board). You can add individuals by searching for their names and selecting them from a list of names. Employees of one of our member institutions are listed with a (P) and usually an institution acronym after their name. Remember to select this registration of the person in order to link the publication to their person profile. If the person is not registered in Cristin, you will have the option to register their name as an unidentified person.
    [Show full text]
  • Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents
    Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations Table of Contents (use control+click to navigate directly to a section) Monograph-Style Theses and Dissertations .............................................................................................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Choosing Monograph Style ........................................................................................................................... 3 Who Decides When a Thesis or Dissertation is Ready to Be Archived? .................................................. 4 Format Requirements That Must be Met ..................................................................................................... 4 Elements of a Thesis or Dissertation—Front Matter, Body and Back Matter .............................................. 4 Other Format Requirements that MUST be met ...................................................................................... 5 Page Size ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Text ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Line Spacing........................................................................................................................................... 5 Margins ................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]