<<

A Complete of mariscalensis (Dinosauria: ) from the (Late ) of West Author(s): Catherine A. Forster, Paul C. Sereno, Thomas W. Evans, Timothy Rowe Source: Journal of Paleontology, Vol. 13, No. 2 (Jun. 8, 1993), pp. 161-170 Published by: The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4523498 Accessed: 12/04/2010 20:52

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use.

Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=vertpaleo.

Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].

The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology.

http://www.jstor.org Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 13(2): 161-170, June 1993 @ 1993 by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology

A COMPLETE SKULL OF CHASMOSA UR US MARISCALENSIS (DINOSAURIA: CERATOPSIDAE) FROM THE AGUJA FORMATION (LATE CAMPANIAN) OF WEST TEXAS

CATHERINE A. FORSTER', PAUL C. SERENO', THOMAS W. EVANS', and TIMOTHY ROWE2 'Department of OrganismalBiology and Anatomy, 1025 East 57th Street, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; 2Departmentof Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78713

ABSTRACT- The recent discovery of a nearly complete ceratopsid skull in the Aguja Formation of southwest Texas supportsprevious conclusions that the Aguja ceratopsidrepresents a distinct , Chasmosaurusmariscalensis. The diagnosticfeatures of C. mariscalensisinclude an extensive anterome- dian projection of the nasal between the premaxillae,erect supraorbitalhorns, and laterally rounded squamosal. Nine cranial features that vary among Chasmosaurusspecies, Pentaceratopssternbergii, and other chasmosaurinesare analyzed.Chasmosaurus mariscalensis appears to be most closely related to northern species of Chasmosaurus(C. belli, C. russelli),which also exhibit a transverselyflattened nasal horn and modifications of the anterior margin of the external naris. The Chasmosaurus, in turn, appearsto be most closely related to the other southern chasmosaurine, stern- bergii. The biogeographichistory inferred from these relationships suggests that the biogeographic exchange between northern and southern chasmosaurinescannot be explained by a single dispersal event to the south.

INTRODUCTION frey and Holmes, in prep.) suggests that there are only two valid northern remains of horned become rare and species, C. belli (including C. brevi- rostris, canadensis, and C. russelli. The new more fragmentary toward the southern end of their kaiseni) skull of C. mariscalensis permits a more complete eval- range in . Only three ceratopsid species, uation of its specific distinction as well as its relation- Pentaceratops sternbergii (= P. fenestratus), Chasmo- ship to northern species of Chasmosaurus and Pen- saurus mariscalensis, and latus (= T. utah- taceratops sternbergii. ensis) have been described from partial skeletons south of the Colorado Plateau et Institutional abbreviations include: AMNH, Amer- (Rowe al., 1981; Lawson, ican Museum of Natural We describe below History, New York;CM, Car- 1976; Lehman, 1981, 1989, 1990). Museum of Natural a nearly complete skull of Chasmosaurus mariscalensis negie History, Pittsburgh; MNA, Museum of Northern Arizona, Ca- Lehman, 1989 from the Aguja Formation (late Cam- Flagstaff; NMC, of southwest Texas. nadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa; ROM, Royal On- panian) tario Vertebrate The skull was discovered a field from the Museum, Toronto; TMM, Paleon- during trip and Radiocarbon of University of Chicago to Big Bend National Park in tology Laboratory, University Texas, Austin; RTMP, Royal Tyrrell Museum of Pa- 1991. The locality, named Windy City (Fig. 1), also hadrosaurid bones. When the skull was leontology, Drumheller; UTEP, Centennial Museum yielded found, of the of Texas at El its left side was with the distal University Paso; YPM, Yale partially exposed, por- Museum of Natural New tion of the left horncore and the left half University Peabody History, supraorbital Haven. of the frill and jugal weathered away. The remainder of the skull was intact for mature except maxillary SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY teeth, which had loosened from their alveoli and washed away. Neither the mandible nor any of the postcranium Systematic Hierarchy was preserved. The skull was buried in a small sand- CERATOPSIAMarsh, 1888 stone lens in the "upper shale member" of the Aguja NEOCERATOPSIASereno, 1986 Formation (Fig. 2), which has been interpreted as a CERATOPSIDAEMarsh, 1888 paralic and coastal floodplain deposit (Lehman, 1985). CHASMOSAURINAELambe, 1915 Small rounded clay rip-up clasts and carbonaceous plant CHASMOSAURUSLambe, 1914 debris were present under the skull within the sand lens. CHASMOSAURUSMARISCALENSIS Lehman, 1989 Recent revision of Canadian Chasmosaurus (God- Figs. 3, 4, 5A 161 162 JOURNAL OF VERTEBRA TE PALEONTOLOG Y, VOL. 13, NO. 2, 1993

proximately twice snout depth (Table 1). The rostral bone is recurved, with concave ventral and posterior margins, and is tightly bound to the paired premaxillae. Dallas The premaxillae form the anterior and ventral margins oTEXAS of the large external naris, anterior to which there is a ...Houston blind premaxillary fossa (Fig. 3, pmfo). The premax- *San Antonio illary fossa is excavated along its ventral margin, and although the central portion of its thin wall is fractured, BIG BEND Persimmon Gap NATIONAL PARK there is no positive evidence that an interpremaxillary fenestra was present. A second fossa, much shallower than the first, occurs near the rostral. The anterior margin of the external naris is formed by a very thin lamina of bone, here termed the premaxillary flange

Panther Junction Rattlesnake Mtn. The Basin

BIG BEND NATIONAL PARK Windy City localityWindylocaity City TMM 43098 Upper Shale Member

Rio Grande River FIGURE 1. Windy City locality (TMM 43098) in Big Bcnd National Park, southwestern Texas. Scale bar equals 10 km.

Revised - Chasmosaurine with a Diagnosis strong O.z anteromedian nasal process extending between the pre- maxillae on the internarial bar, erect supraorbital horn- Terlingua Creek Sandstone Member cores that attain an angle of 850 to the maxillary tooth S- McKinney Springs Tongue row in adults, and a squamosal with a convex lateral O - Rattlesnake MountainSandstone frill margin. LL - Member Referred Specimen - TMM 43098-1, well preserved skull distal left distal lacking supraorbital horncore, (D left jugal, left squamosal, and the distal parietal. <- Lower Shale Member Locality--Windy City (TMM 43098), southwest of Rattlesnake Mountain in Big Bend National Park, Brewster County, Texas (Fig. 1). Lat. 291 3', Long. 103033'. Horizon-"Upper shale member," Aguja Forma- 50 tion (Late Campanian) (Fig. 2).

DESCRIPTION Basal Sandstone Member a 4 @- The skull appears to belong to a fully mature indi- Z vidual. Cranial sutures are coossified around the orbit, o on the dorsal aspect of the skull, and between the skull O bones and secondary dermal elements such as the epi- CrC jugal. The epoccipitals are either partially or complete- ly coossified with the squamosal. Ten epoccipitals are z W present on the squamosal (Fig. 3), the highest number CL ever recorded in ceratopsid and presumably rep- FIGURE 2. section of the Formation, resenting the full adult complement. Stratigraphic Aguja using informal nomenclature of Lehman (1985), showing the Snout (Figs. 3-4) level of the skull of Chasmosaurus mariscalensis (TMM 43098-1). Other indicated in section include a had- As in other chasmosaurines, the snout is propor- rosaurid (Kritosaurus sp.), crocodilian (Deinosuchus riogran- tionately elongate, with preorbital length equalling ap- densis), ammonites, and pelecypods (after Lehman, 1985).

164 JOURNAL OF VERTEBRA TE PALEONTOLOG Y, VOL. 13, NO. 2, 1993

\ /"\

I \

I \ \ SI !\, \

\ 6 \

21\ \20 22 • ~22 ,

/ \ i / . .. ".. 1 14 16 9

10

15 21 2

(Fig. 3, pmfl), which arises along the posterior side of the narial strut. It is slightly damaged in TMM 43098- 1. A similar flange is present in C. belli and C. russelli. TABLE 1. Measurements(cm) of the skull of Chasmosau- In other chasmosaurines, the flange is either restricted rus Bone abbreviations: mariscalensis (TMM 43098-1). j, to the anterodorsal corner of the external naris (P. jugal; m, maxilla; n, nasal; pm, premaxilla;po, postorbital; MNA or absent. In the antero- sq, squamosal. sternbergii, P1.1747) ventral corner of the external naris, a thin, quadran- from 1. Total skull 152 gular premaxillary process projects posteriorly length (preserved) the narial Anterior to the nasal 2. Supraorbitalhorn length (preserved) 43 septum (Fig. 3, pmp). 3. Nasal horn length 15 horncore, the dorsal process of the premaxilla is over- 4. Squamosal maximum width 32 lapped laterally by a tongue-shaped process of the na- 5. Squamosal maximum length 89 sal. The posterior process of the premaxilla curves pos- 6. Squamosal length to j-po-sq junction 85 terodorsally onto the lateral side of the snout posterior 7. Po-j suture length 9 to the external naris. The blunt distal end of the pos- 8. Orbital po-j suture to sq anteroventraltip below terior process is finger-shaped, and fitted into a shallow lateral temporal fenestra 20 fork on the side of the nasal, as in P. sternbergii, C. 9. Anteroventraltip of sq to m-j suture 21 and C. russelli. 10. Anteroventral of to of 13 belli, tip sq tip jugal the 11. Orbital suture narial suture 37 The nasal horncore is positioned above posterior po-j pm-n of the external naris and is 12. Orbital po-j suture to antorbital fenestra 17 portion strongly compressed 13. Orbital po-j suture to m-j suture 15 transversely, with a sharp posterior edge (Fig. 4A). The 14. Antorbital fenestra to m-j suture 10 nasal horncores in other species of Chasmosaurus are 15. Tip of jugal to pm-m suture along tooth row 47 flattened transversely, but none is as compressed as in 16. Antorbital fenestra to narial pm-n suture 26 TMM 43098-1. In lateral view, the nasal horncore 17. Antorbital fenestra to pm-m suture along tooth curves anteriorly and narrows toward a broad (and row 25 possibly damaged) distal end, as observed in northern 18. row 24 Pm-m along tooth to narial pm-n suture species of Chasmosaurus (e.g., C. russelli, NMC 2280). suture to of rostral 34 19. Pm-n tip In C. mariscalensis, no external internasal suture is 20. Pm-m suture along tooth row to tip of rostral 24 21. tooth row 32 visible, and there is no sign of a separate epinasal os- Maxillary length on An unusual antero- 22. Supraorbitalhorn base circumference 36 sification the nasal horncore. median process of the conjoined nasals extends ante- FORSTER ET AL. -SKULL OF CHASMOSAURUS MARISCALENSIS 165

A B A

a eplO

//

I ir S. pm

B b pm epl

FIGURE 4. Narial in Chasmosaurusmariscalensis region ep8 (TMM 43098-1). A, nasal horn with cross-sections at two levels (a, b), x 0.31; B, internarialbar in anterodorsalview, x0.45.

riorly between the premaxillae for approximately 8 cm (Fig. 4B). A similar nasal process does not occur in northern species of Chasmosaurus or found in any oth- er ceratopsid. The triangular maxilla contains 27 or 28 alveoli, as in the largest maxillae previously discovered in the Aguja Formation (Lehman, 1989). Canadian speci- mens of Chasmosaurus have a similar number of max- epl illary teeth. The teeth have a strong central keel, subtle FIGURE 5. Right squamosal of Chasmosaurusin lateral fluting to each side of the keel, and low marginal den- view. A, Chasmosaurusmariscalensis (TMM 43098-1) x 0.8. ticles. The cheek is shallow anteriorly but deeply inset B, Chasmosaurusbelli (AMNH 5401), x 0.10. posteriorly, as in P. sternbergii (MNA P1.1747) and other chasmosaurines. The depth and anteroposterior extent of the cheek emargination in specimens of Chas- mosaurus appears to be correlated with the extent of dorsoventral crushing and may not constitute natural topsids (e.g., , Hatcher et al., 1907:fig. 22). variation. Several vascular foramina open on the max- Its smooth surface contrasts with surrounding areas, illa along the cheek emargination, with one large fo- suggesting that the skin overlying the fossa was not ramen opening above the cheek behind the sutural tightly bound to the bony surface. junction of the premaxilla, maxilla, and nasal (Fig. 3), as in other skulls of Chasmosaurus (e.g., Chasmosaurus Circumorbital Region (Fig. 3) sp., RTMP 81.19.17). The maxillary processes dorsal and ventral to the The circumorbital sutures between the postorbital, small antorbital fossa in TMM 43098-1 are propor- jugal, lacrimal, prefrontal, and palpebral are partially, tionately broad, as in other maxillae referred to C. or completely, coossified. The palpebral is fused to the mariscalensis (Lehman, 1989:fig. 11C). The large dor- lateral margin of the prefrontal as a rugose prominence, sal process contacts the prefrontal, narrowly separating on the anterodorsal margin of the orbit. The long erect the nasal and lacrimal; this sutural configuration also supraorbital horncore is solid to its base (43 cm pre- occurs in other specimens of Chasmosaurus (e.g., C. served, with 49 cm estimated to tip, as measured along belli, ROM 839; C. russelli, NMC 2280). The smooth the curve of the horn; Table 1). Several referred adult surface of the antorbital fossa, which borders the dorsal specimens (Lehman, 1989) have an erect orientation margin of the antorbital fenestra, is recessed into the for the supraorbital horncores as well. Judging from a dorsal process of the maxilla as in some other cera- growth series of isolated horncores (Lehman, 1989:fig. 166 JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATEPALEONTOLOGY, VOL. 13, NO. 2, 1993

TABLE 2. Measurements (cm) of the squamosal in Chas- two-thirds of its lateral margin are convex, rather than mosaurusand Pentaceratops. straight or gently concave as in most other chasmo- saurines (Fig. 5). Thus, the distal two-thirds of the Maximum Maximum Length/width squamosal are proportionately broader in C. maris- Taxon length width ratio calensis than in other chasmosaurines. Chasmosaurusmariscalensis Ten epoccipitals are present along the margin of the TMM 43098-1 89 32 2.8 right squamosal, more than have been recorded in any Chasmosaurusrusselli other ceratopsid and one more than in adult specimens of P. NMC 2280 78 26 3.0 C. belli, C. russelli, and sternbergii. Juvenile squa- mosals of C. mariscalensis (Lehman, 1989:fig. 8) and Chasmosaurusbelli C. belli (NMC 1254) have fewer epoccipitals than do AMNH 5402 70 27 2.6 those of adults. In TMM 43098-1, only the two an- AMNH 5401 79 28 2.8 terior epoccipitals are fully coossified with the squa- YPM 2016 81 23 3.5 mosal; progressive coossification of epoccipitals from Pentaceratopssternbergii anterior to posterior during growth has also been ob- MNA PI.1747 132 35 3.8 served in other ceratopsids (Lehman, 1989; Forster, in AMNH 1624 125 49 2.6 prep.) and probably also occurred in C. mariscalensis.

DISCUSSION the supraorbital horncores and become 4), straighten Chasmosaurus mariscalensis more erect during growth. The of Chasmosaurus mariscalensis was Laterotemporal Region (Fig. 3) diagnosis originally based on five characters: broad squamosal; The subtriangular laterotemporal fenestra has a six large epoccipitals; maxillary horizontal shelf absent; maximum diameter approximately 75 percent that of premaxillary "posterodorsal extension" absent; long the orbit, which is relatively large for a ceratopsid. As supraorbital horncores (Lehman, 1989:139). The new is typical among ceratopsids, the jugal is T-shaped with skull has allowed a revision of these original characters. the main axis inclined somewhat posteroventrally. On The new skull shows that the squamosal is propor- the ventral side of the laterotemporal fenestra, the jugal tionately more elongate in more mature individuals, and squamosal are separated by the quadratojugal, and that, although the squamosal is distinctly broader which forms a significant portion of the ventral margin in its distal two-thirds, the maximum width of the of the opening. In C. belli (e.g., ROM 843) and C. squamosal is not relatively greater than in other species russelli (e.g., NMC 2280), in contrast, the jugal has a of Chasmosaurus or most other chasmosaurines. There distinct posterior process that contacts the squamosal are ten, rather than six, epoccipitals in TMM 43098- and excludes the quadratojugal from the margin of the 1, due to its larger size relative to previously described fenestra. material. These tab-shaped or elliptical epoccipitals do The quadratojugal overlaps the quadrate shaft lat- not appear to differ in size from those in other adult erally and extends ventrally to the quadrate condyle. chasmosaurines. The anterior portion of the maxillary The quadrate and squamosal, as usual in ceratopsids, cheek emargination is indeed shallow in TMM 43098- are not coossified, and the right quadrate is slightly 1, in contrast to the deeply emarginated cheeks found displaced. The large pyramidal epijugal, which is com- in specimens of other species of Chasmosaurus. The pletely fused to the jugal and quadratojugal, projects appearance of a more marked cheek emargination in laterally. The anterior surface of the epijugal is flat and other skulls of Chasmosaurus, however, may be the tilted slightly dorsally, with the dorsal margin devel- result of dorsoventral crushing of the skull (e.g., in oped as a rounded crest. skulls of C. belli: deep cheek in NMC 2280 and AMNH 5402 versus shallow cheek in ROM 839). Furthermore, Frill (Figs. 3, 5) a shallow anterior cheek emargination may character- Central and posterior sections of the parietal frill are ize other chasmosaurines (e.g., P. sternbergii, MNA lacking, and severe transverse compression of the pos- P1.1747). The new skull also shows that a complete terior frill has rotated the lateral margin of the right premaxillary "posterodorsal process" extends as far squamosal slightly ventrally from its natural position posteriorly in C. mariscalensis as in other species of (Fig. 3). The squamosal is longer in adult C. maris- Chasmosaurus. The absence of the premaxillary "pos- calensis than previously reconstructed on the basis of terodorsal process" in previously described specimens less complete material (Lehman, 1989:fig. 9A). The was due to damage and poor preservation. Finally, maximum width of the squamosal (relative to its length) when viewed within a cladistic framework, the long is similar to that in other chasmosaurines (Table 2), supraorbital horncores in C. mariscalensis may con- and this measure, therefore, is not diagnostic for C. stitute a retained primitive condition- a condition that mariscalensis. The squamosal, nevertheless, appears was present in the common chasmosaurine ancestor. distinctly broader in C. mariscalensis because the distal The short supraorbital horncores in other species of FORSTER ET AL. -SKULL OF CHASMOSAURUS MARISCALENSIS 167

Chasmosaurus, in other words, may represent the evo- In C. belli and C. russelli, the horncore is shorter but lutionary novelty, as a reversal from a primitive, long- the posterior curvature is usually discernible. The horned chasmosaurine condition (see Discussion, horncore in juvenile C. mariscalensis (e.g., UTEP Character 5). P.37.7.083) is identical to that in juvenile C. belli (e.g., Three other cranial characters, however, confirm that NMC 1254). In all other chasmosaurines, the supra- C. mariscalensis represents a distinct species. First, the orbital horncores curve anteriorly (Dodson and Currie, erect orientation of the supraorbital horncores in C. 1990:fig. 29.3). In centrosaurines, supraorbital horn- mariscalensis is unique among ceratopsids. The horn- cores are not well enough developed to evaluate their core rises dorsally at approximately 850 from the max- curvature. illary tooth row in adults (Fig. 3), as measured along 3. Straplike posterior border of parietal fenestra (Fig. the straight axis of the proximal half of the horncore. 6A). In Chasmosaurus, the straplike posterior border Although more difficult to estimate in fragmentary ma- of the parietal fenestra is more than twice as broad terials, the horncore and adult referred horn- transversely as deep proximodistally (C. mariscalensis, cores in C. mariscalensis all seem to show the nearly Lehman, 1989:fig. 7A; C. belli, Lull, 1933). The narrow vertical orientation of the supraorbital horncore (Leh- posterior margin is not necessarily correlated with the man, 1989). The orientation of the supraorbital horn- large size of the fenestra in Chasmosaurus. P. stern- core in other ceratopsids, in contrast, varies between bergii also has very large parietal fenestrae, but the 450 and 600 from the maxillary tooth row (Dodson and posterior parietal margin is proportionately deeper than Currie, 1990:fig. 29.3). Second, the long median pro- in Chasmosaurus (Fig. 6B). In other chasmosaurines cess of the nasal, which projects anteriorly between the and centrosaurines, the posterior margin of the parietal premaxillae (Fig. 4B), is unique among ceratopsids. fenestra is also proportionately much deeper (Dodson And third, as discussed briefly above, the distal two- and Currie, 1990:fig. 29.3). Although some basal neo- thirds of the squamosal have a convex lateral margin, ceratopsians (e.g., ) also have a straplike resulting in a broader distal squamosal than is present posterior border, a posterior border of deeper propor- in other chasmosaurines (Fig. 5). In addition, the keel- tions is present in and thus would shaped nasal horn is more strongly compressed trans- be primitive within Ceratopsidae. versely than in other chasmosaurines and may even- 4. Posterior frill very broad (Fig. 6A). In C. belli and tually prove to be diagnostic for C. mariscalensis. In C. russelli, the frill expands distally as a broad, trian- other species of Chasmosaurus, the cross-sectional gular shield, with a maximum transverse width more shape of the nasal horn varies from subcircular (e.g., than twice the width across the orbital skull roof. In C. belli, ROM 839) to elliptical (e.g., C. belli, AMNH other ceratopsids, the maximum width of the frill is 5402). As with TMM 43098-1, the discovery of ad- less than twice the width of the interorbital skull roof. ditional specimens may further clarify the structure of Torosaurus is the only exception and appears to have C. mariscalensis and provide answers to these ques- evolved its broad frill independently. The dimensions tions. of the posterior frill in C. mariscalensis cannot be de- termined. Chasmosaurus Two characters shared by the northern species, C. Chasmosaurus mariscalensis shares several derived belli and C. russelli, are absent in C. mariscalensis. features with C. belli and C. russelli, suggesting that 5. Short supraorbital horncores (Fig. 6A). The su- the genus Chasmosaurus is monophyletic. These char- praorbital horncores in C. belli and C. russelli are short- acters are described below (see Appendix for a tabu- er than in any other chasmosaurines and usually con- lation of character-states among chasmosaurines). sist of low, hooked prominences (e.g., C. belli, AMNH 1. Thin premaxillary flange along the anterior mar- 5402, ROM 839, ROM 843; C. russelli, NMC 2280, gin of the external naris (Fig. 3, pmfl). In Chasmosau- NMC 8800). In one specimen ofC. belli (AMNH 5401; rus, the entire anterior margin of the external naris is Lull, 1933), however, the horncores reach a length and bordered by a thin flange of the premaxilla along the diameter somewhat more than half that seen in other posterior side of the narial strut. The flange articulates adult chasmosaurines. The supraorbital horncore di- with its opposite in the midline to form a thin nasal mensions in C. belli and C. russelli are clearly very septum. In other chasmosaurines, this lamina of bone small, and this appears to represent a partial reversal is either limited to the anterodorsal corner of the ex- within the genus Chasmosaurus to the primitive cer- ternal naris (e.g., P. sternbergii, MNA P1.1747) or is atopsian condition, which is retained in centrosaur- absent (e.g., Triceratops, CM 1221). The condition in ines. centrosaurines is difficult to compare, given the less 6. Jugal-squamosal contact below the laterotemporal complex configuration of the premaxilla, but a distinct fenestra. In C. belli and C. russelli, a posterior process marginal lamina of bone is not developed. of the jugal passes under the laterotemporal fenestra, 2. Supraorbital horncores curved posteriorly (Fig. 3). contacting the squamosal and excluding the quadra- In Chasmosaurus, the axis of the supraorbital horncore tojugal from the border of the fenestra. This posterior curves posteriorly. In C. mariscalensis the curvature jugal process is absent in C. mariscalensis (Fig. 3), decreases with growth but is still apparent in the adult. Pentaceratops, and other chasmosaurines, and as a re- 168 JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, VOL. 13, NO. 2, 1993

A i B / I /\\ ,'

I I

I I

ii ~ U; r. ...

": " "/: " 'i

FIGURE 6. Chasmosaurineskulls in dorsal view. A, Chasmosaurusrusselli (based on ROM 843). B, Pentaceratopssternbergii (based on AMNH 6325 and MNA P1.1747).

sult, the quadratojugal borders the laterotemporal fe- nestra. A very similar posteriorjugal process, however, is developed in all centrosaurines (e.g., Centrosaurus). But given the absence of jugal-squamosal contact be- C5 low the fenestra in basal ceratopsians (e.g., Psittaco- 09 saurus, Protoceratops), it is more parsimonious to sup- pose that the posterior jugal process evolved C , 6' 5 independently in centrosaurines and in the common ancestor of C. belli and C. russelli. a e e Chasmosaurus and Pentaceratops After comparisons between Chasmosaurus and oth- 056 er ceratopsids, we have identified three characters that 56 6

Chasmosaurus 1, 2, 3, 4* FIGURE 7. Cladogramshowing relationshipsof three spe- cies of Chasmosaurusand Pentaceratopssternbergii, based 4*, 9 7, 8, on analysis of nine characters.This tree has a length of 11 steps and a consistency index of 0.82. Characternumbers show position ofapomorphic states on the most-parsimonius tree (* = equivocal; see Appendix for characterlist and char- CERATOPSIDAE acter-statedistributions). FORSTER ET AL. -SKULL OF CHASMOSAURUS MARISCALENSIS 169 support a sister-group relationship between Chasmo- this study are sustained, the roughly contemporaneous saurus and Pentaceratops. southern chasmosaurines, C. mariscalensis and P. 7. Posterior process of the premaxilla with blunt, sternbergii, are not each other's closest relatives. Rath- finger-shaped distal end inset on the nasal (Fig. 3). The er, C. mariscalensis is closer to the northern species of unusual shape and position of the distal end of the Chasmosaurus, C. belli and C. russelli. This phyloge- posterior process of the premaxilla has been recognized netic interplay between southern and northern chas- previously as a derived similarity uniting Chasmosau- mosaurines necessarily involves a more complex bio- rus and Pentaceratops (Lehman, 1990; Forster, 1990). geographic history than a single vicariant event In other chasmosaurines, the process is evenly tapered separating once continuous southern and northern cer- distally and is situated on the maxilla-nasal suture. In atopsid populations or a single dispersal event to the centrosaurines, the posterior process of the premaxilla south from the more diverse northern ceratopsid fau- is broad and spatulate and is also situated on the max- nas. Undoubtedly, the biogeographical relations of illa-nasal suture. chasmosaurines during the Late were more 8. Large parietal fenestrae (Fig. 6). The parietal fe- complex, with movement ofchasmosaurines both north nestrae are very large in Chasmosaurus and Pentacer- and south along the western North American cordil- atops, with a proximodistal diameter that exceeds the lera. Phylogenetic hypotheses that include all ceratop- preorbital length of the skull. The preserved portions sids and careful description of rare ceratopsid remains of the parietal and squamosal in C. mariscalensis from Maastrichtian deposits in the south will improve strongly suggest that this species had parietal fenestrae our understanding of the biogeographic history of cer- comparable in size to that in other species of Chas- atopsids. mosaurus. In all other ceratopsids, the diameter of the parietal fenestrae is less than preorbital length. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 9. Marked median in embayment posterior parietal We thank the National Park Service and the super- In Chasmosaurus and Pentaceratops, margin (Fig. 6). intendent and staff of Big Bend National Park, partic- the of the frill has a V-shaped median posterior margin ularly P. Koepp and R. Arnberger, for their coopera- embayment. In C. russelli (Fig. 6A), C. mariscalensis tion. The was collected under the the em- specimen supervision (Lehman, 1989), and P. sternbergii (Fig. 6B), of Robert H. and Earl Yarmer of the Texas notch between Rainey bayment is marked and is not merely a Memorial Museum Vertebrate Labora- In the Paleontology the innermost pair ofepoccipitals. C. belli, depth under of U.S. of to tory, working authority Department of the embayment varies from shallow (YPM 2016) the Interior Permit 91 We also A similar of the Antiquities -BIBE-1(P). deep (ROM 843). embayment pos- thank Anne Weil and the students of the University in other chasmosaur- terior frill margin is not present of who in the and col- a Chicago, participated discovery ines. Centrosaurines also lack comparatively deep lection of the skull. We thank Carol Abraczinskas for the an- median embayment of the parietal, although execution of the finished illustrations and Earl Yarmer curled innermost of in adults teriorly pair epoccipitals for of the Wann Jr., the of a preparation specimen. Langston, gives impression deep parietal embayment. Thomas M. Lehman, Peter Dodson, and Philip J. Cur- rie provided helpful comments on an earlier version CONCLUSIONS of this manuscript. This research was supported by a from the of PS and The discovery of a nearly complete skull of Chas- grant University Chicago (to TE), and The David and Lucile Packard Foundation mosaurus mariscalensis in the Aguja Formation of (to PS). is also made to the Donors of The Texas permits a more detailed comparison of this Acknowledgment Petroleum Research administered the Amer- southern chasmosaurine to northern species of Chas- Fund, by ican Chemical for of mosaurus, to Pentaceratops sternbergii, and other Society (to TR), partial support northern chasmosaurines. C. mariscalensis exhibits this research. several unique cranial features, confirming an earlier LITERATURE CITED study (Lehman, 1989) that described the Texas cera- topsid as a distinct species. Dodson, P., and P. J. Currie. 1990. The Neoceratopsia;pp. Comparisons to other chasmosaurines suggests that 593-618 in D. B. Weishampel, P. Dodson, and Z. Kie- C. mariscalensis is most closely related to the Canadian lan-Jaworowska(eds.), The Dinosauria. University of species, C. belli and C. russelli (Fig. 7, characters 1-4), California Press, Berkeley. rather than a transitional form between these species Forster, C. A. 1990. The cranial morphology and system- with a of cer- ofChasmosaurus and Pentaceratops sternbergii, as pre- atics of Triceratops, preliminaryanalysis atopsian phylogeny. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, viously hypothesized (Lehman, 1989). The genus of of in to be most re- Department Geology, University Pennsylvania, Chasmosaurus, turn, appears closely Philadelphia, 227 pp. lated to Pentaceratops based on several cranial char- Hatcher, J. B., O. C. Marsh, and R. S. Lull. 1907. The acters (Fig. 7, characters 7-9). . United States Geological Survey Mono- Analysis of the new skull of C. mariscalensis con- graph 49, 300 pp. firms the endemism of southern chasmosaurines dur- Lambe, L. M. 1914. On the fore-limb of a carnivorous ing the Campanian. If the phylogenetic conclusions of from the Belly River Formation of , 170 JOURNAL OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, VOL. 13, NO. 2, 1993

and a new genus of Ceratopsia from the same horizon, by numerous synapomorphies (e.g., Lehman, 1990; Forster, with remarks on the integument of some Cretaceous 1990). The data matrix was analyzed using the exhaustive herbivorous dinosaurs. Ottawa Naturalist 27:129-135. search algorithm in PAUP (Swofford, 1985), and one most- 1915. On Eoceratops canadensis, gen. nov., with parsimonious tree was determined. This tree had a length of remarks on other genera of Cretaceous horned dino- 11 steps with a consistency index of 0.82. saurs. Geological Survey of Museum Bulletin 12:1-49. Lawson, D. A. 1976. and Torosaurus, Characters and Character-States: Maestrichtian dinosaurs from Trans-Pecos, Texas. Jour- of naris: nal of Paleontology 50:158-164. 1. Flange along anterior margin external partial Lehman, T. M. 1981. The Alamo Wash local fauna: a new (0), complete (1). anterior look at the old Ojo Alamo fauna; pp. 189-221 in S. G. 2. Supraorbital horncore curvature: (0), poste- Lucas, K. Rigby, Jr., and B. S. Kues (eds.), Advances in rior (1). fenes- Paleontology. University of 3. Dimensions of the posterior margin of parietal twice Press, Albuquerque. tra: transverse width less (0), or more (1), than 1985. Stratigraphy, sedimentology, and paleontol- anteroposterior depth. 4. frill transverse less or more ogy of Upper Cretaceous (Campanian-Maastrichtian) Posterior width: (0), (1), skull width across the orbits. sedimentary rocks in Trans-Pecos Texas. Unpublished than twice Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 299 pp. 5. Supraorbital horncore length: long (0), short (1). 1989. Chasmosaurus mariscalensis, sp. nov., a new 6. Jugal-squamosal contact below the laterotemporal fe- ceratopsian dinosaur from Texas. Journal of Vertebrate nestra: absent (0), present (1). 7. Paleontology 9:137-162. Premaxillary posterolateral process: evenly tapered 1990. The ceratopsian subfamily Chasmosaurinae: with tip on maxilla-nasal suture (0), abruptly nar- and systematics; pp. 211-229 in K. rowed with tip isolated on nasal (1). Carpenter and P. J. Currie (eds.), Dinosaur Systematics. 8. Parietal fenestra diameter: less (0), or more (1), than Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York. preorbital length. Lull, R. S. 1933. A revision of the Ceratopsia or horned 9. Parietal posteromedian embayment: weak or absent dinosaurs. Memoirs of the Peabody Museum of Natural (0), marked (1). History, Yale University, 175 pp. Marsh, O. C. 1888. A new family of horned Dinosauria from the Cretaceous. American Journal of Science 36: 477-478. Character-State Distributions. Rowe, T., E. H. Colbert, and J. D. Nations. 1981. The occurrence of with a of its Pentaceratops description frill; Characters pp. 29-48 in S. G. Lucas, J. K. Rigby, Jr., and B. S. Kues (eds.), Advances in San Juan Paleontology. University Taxa 5 9 of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque. Chasmosaurus mariscalensis 111?0 0111 P. C. 1986. of the Sereno, Phylogeny -hipped dinosaurs Chasmosaurus belli 11111 1111 National Research (Order ). Geographic Chasmosaurus russelli 11111 1111 2:234-256. 00000 0111 D. L. 1985. Parsi- Pentaceratops sternbergii Swofford, Phylogenetic Analysis Using Other chasmosaurines 00000 0000 Version 3.0. Natural mony. Illinois History Survey, Centrosaurinae ON001 1000 Champaign. 0 = primitive state; 1 = derived state; N = not available APPENDIX due to transformation; 0 = primitive state for taxon with some ingroup variation; ? = not available due to lack of Character-state distributions are listed below for the nine preservation. binary characters discussed in the text that vary among Pen- taceratops sternbergii and three species of Chasmosaurus (Fig. 7). "Other chasmosaurines" and centrosaurines were chosen as successive outgroups to Pentaceratops and Chasmosaurus, and the of each of these outgroups is supported Received 26 March 1992; Accepted 24 June 1993.