REFERENCES 1. Ochir-Goryaeva M.A. 2008. Arkheologicheskie

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

REFERENCES 1. Ochir-Goryaeva M.A. 2008. Arkheologicheskie REFERENCES 1. Ochir-Goryaeva M.A. 2008. Arkheologicheskie pamyatniki volgo-manychskikh stepey (svod pamyatnikov, issledovannykh na territorii Respubliki Kalmykiya v 1929–1997 gg.). [Archaeological monuments of the Volga-Manych steppes (the list of architectural monuments, explored on the territory of the Republic of Kalmykia in 1929–1997)]. Elista, Gerel Publishers: 298 p. (In Russian). 2. Zlatkin I.Ya. 1964. Istoriya Dzhungarskogo khanstva (1635–1758). [The history of the Dhungar khanate (1635–1758)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ.: 482 p. (In Russian). 3. Moiseev V.A. 1998. Rossiya i Dzhungarskoe khanstvo v XVIII veke (ocherk vneshnepoliticheskikh otnosheniy). [Russia and the Dzungar khanate in the 18th century (essay of foreign policy relations)]. Barnaul, Altai state University Publ.: 174 p. (In Russian). 4. Gurevich B.P. 1985. [The nature of the political status of the Dzungar khanate and its interpretation in the historiography of China]. In: IV Mezhdunarodnyy kongress mongolovedov. T. 1. [Proceedings of the IVth International Congress of Mongolists. Vol. I]. Ulanbaatar: 186–191. (In Russian and In Mongolian). 5. Tepkeev V.T. 2012. Kalmyki v severnom Prikaspii vo vtoroy treti XVII v.[Kalmyks in the North Caspian in the second third of the XVII century]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 378 p. (In Russian). 6. Istoriya Kalmykii s drevneyshikh vremen do nashikh dney. V 3 t. [History of Kalmykia from ancient times to the present day. In three volumes. Vol. 3]. 2009. Elista, Gerel Publishing House: 848 p. (vol. 1); 840 p. (vol. 2); 752 p. (vol. 3). (In Russian). 7. Maksimov K.N. 2010. Velikaya Otechestvennaya voyna: Kalmykiya i kalmyki. 2-e izd., dop. [Great Patriotic War: Kalmykia and Kalmyks. The 2nd extend. edition]. Moscow, Nauka Publ.: 406 p. (In Russian). 8. Maksimov K.N. 2004. Tragediya naroda. Repressii v Kalmykii. 1918–1940-e gody. [The tragedy of the nation. Repression in Kalmykia. 1918–1940s]. Moscow, Nauka Publ.: 311 p. (In Russian). 9. Batmaev M.M. 2002. Sotsial'no-politicheskiy stroy i khozyaystvo kalmykov v XVII–XVIII vekakh. [The socio- political system and economy of the Kalmyks in the 17th–18th centuries]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 400 p. (In Russian). 10. Komandzhaev A.N. 1999. Khozyaystvo i sotsial'nye otnosheniya v Kalmykii v kontse XIX – nachale XX veka: istoricheskiy opyt i sovremennost'. [Economy and social relations in Kalmykia in the late XIX – early XX century: historical experience and modernity]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 262 p. (In Russian). 11. Ochirov U.B. 2006. Kalmykiya v period Grazhdanskoy voyny (1917–1920 gg.). [Kalmykia during the Civil war (1917–1920)]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 448 p. (In Russian). 12. Tsuryumov A.V. 2007. Kalmytskoe khanstvo v sostave Rossii: problemy politicheskikh vzaimootnosheniy. [Kalmyk khanate in Russia: problems of political relations]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 464 p. (In Russian). 13. Badmaeva E.N. 2010. Nizhnee Povolzh'e: opyt i itogi realizatsii gosudarstvennoy politiki v sotsial'no- ekonomicheskoy sfere (1921–1933 gg.) [The lower Volga region: the experience and results of implementation of state policy in the socio-economic sphere (1921–1933)]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 544 p. (In Russian). 14. Sartikova E.V. 2008. Razvitie shkol'nogo obrazovaniya v Kalmykii v XX veke. [The development of school education in Kalmykia in the 20th century]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 407 p. (In Russian). 15. Dordzhieva G.Sh. 2001. Buddiyskaya tserkov' Kalmykii v Kalmykii v kontse XIX – pervoy polovine XX v. [Buddhist Church in Kalmykia in the late of the 19th – first half of the 20th century]. Moscow, Institute of Russian history RAS Publ.: 191 p. (In Russian). 16. Kalmykiya v gody Velikoy Otechestvennoy voyny. [Kalmykia during the Great Patriotic War]. 2005. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 312 p. (In Russian). 17. Ochirova N.G. (Gen. ed.) 2010. Istoriya buddizma v SSSR i Rossiyskoy Federatsii v 1985–1999 gg. [The history of Buddhism in the USSR and the Russian Federation in 1985–1999]. Moscow, Foundation of modern history Publ.: 392 p. (In Russian). 18. Borisenko I.V. 1994. Khramy Kalmykii: al'bom. [Temples of Kalmykia: album]. Elista, Kalmyk Book Publ.: 112 p. (In Russian). 19. Belousov S.S. 2003. Pravoslavnye prikhody v Kalmykii v XIX – nachale XX v. (1806–1917 gg.). [Orthodox parishes in Kalmykia in the XIX – early XX century (1806–1917)]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 160 p. (In Russian). 20. Bakaeva E.P. 1994. Buddizm v Kalmykii. Istoriko-etnograficheskie ocherki. [Buddhism in Kalmykia. Historical and ethnographic essays]. Elista, Kalmyk Book Publ.: 128 p. (In Russian). 21. Nadneeva K.A. 1999. Buddizm makhayany v Respublike Kalmykiya. [Mahayana Buddhism in Kalmykia]. Elista, Kalmyk State University Publ.: 76 p. (In Russian). 22. Ulanov M.S. 2003. Buddizm v istorii russkoy filosofii XIX – pervoy poloviny XX v. [Buddhism in the history of Russian philosophy XIX – first half XX centuries]. Elista, Kalmyk State University Publ.: 178 p. (In Russian). 23. Kurapov A.A. 2007. Buddizm i vlast' v Kalmytskom khanstve XVII–XVIII vv. [Buddhism and power in the Kalmyk khanate of the XVII–XVIII centuries]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 278 p. (In Russian). 24. Lamaizm v Kalmykii i voprosy nauchnogo ateizma. [Lamaism in Kalmykia and questions of scientific atheism]. 1980. Elista: 157 p. (In Russian). 25. Bakaeva E.P., Zhukovskaya N.L. (Managing editors). 2010. Kalmyki. (Seriya: Narody i kul'tury). [Kalmyks. (Ser.: Peoples and cultures)]. Moscow, Nauka Publ.: 568 p. (In Russian). 26. Maksimov K.N., Ochirov U.B. 2012. Kalmyki v napoleonovskikh voynakh. [Kalmyks in the Napoleonic wars]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 519 p. (In Russian). 27. Maksimov K.N. et al. (Comp.) 2012. Uchastie kalmykov v napoleonovskikh voynakh. Sb. dokumentov I materialov. [Participation of the Kalmyks in the Napoleonic wars. Proceedings of documents and materials. Compiled by K.N. Maksimov and others]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 537 p. (In Russian). 28. Riazhev А.S. (Editor-in-Chief). 2011. Volzhskie stavropol'skie kalmyki: seredina 30-kh gg. XVIII v. – pervaya polovina XIX v. Dokumenty i materialy. T. 1: Stavropol'skoe kalmytskoe voysko v seredine 30-kh – 60-e gg. XVIII v. [The Volga Stavropol Kalmyks: From the mid-1730s through the first half of the 19th century. Documents and materials. Volume I: The Stavropol Kalmyk host from the mid-1730s through 1760s]. Rostov- on-Don: SSC RAS Publishers: 320 p. (In Russian). 29. Ubushaev V.B., Ubushaev K.V. 2007. Kalmyki: vyselenie, vozvrashchenie, vozrozhdenie. 1943–1959 gg. [Kalmyks: deportation, return, revival. 1943–1959]. Elista, Kalm. University Publ.: 496 p. (In Russian). 30. Esenova T.S. 2007. Russkiy yazyk v Kalmykii: Sociokul'turnye portrety i lingvokul'turnye tipazhi. [Russian language in Kalmykia: Sociocultural portraits and linguistic-cultural types]. Elista, Kalmyk State University Publ.: 192 p. (In Russian). 31. Mandzhikova B.B. (Comp.). 2008. Kalmytsko-russkiy terminologicheskiy slovar' (flora i fauna). [Kalmyk- Russian terminological dictionary (flora and fauna)]. Elista, Kalmyk Institute for Humanitarian Studies RAS: 124 p. (In Russian). 32. Ochirova U.U., Sangaeva L.S. (Comp.). 2011. [Explanatory dictionary of Kalmyk proverbs and sayings]. Elista, Kalmyk Institute for Humanitarian Studies RAS. (In Kalmyk). 33. Monraev M.U. 2008. Kalmytskie lichnye imena (semantika). [Kalmyk personal names (semantics)]. Elista. (In Russian). 34. Mushaev V.N. 2005. Struktura i semantika kalmytskogo predlozheniya. [The structure and semantics of a Kalmyk sentence]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 382 p. (In Russian). 35. Omakaeva E.U. 2011. Tipologiya modeleobrazuyushchikh chlenov predlozheniya v kalmytskom i mongol'skom yazykakh v svete glagol'no-aktantnoy teorii. [The typology of model forming members of the sentence in the Kalmyk and Mongolian languages in the light of verb-actant theory]. Ulaanbaatar. (In Russian). 36. Kukanova V.V., Bembeev E.V., Mulaeva N.M., Ochirova N.Ch. 2012. Metarazmetka v Nacional'nom korpuse kalmytskogo yazyka. [Metatext marking in the Kalmyk language]. Vestnik Kalmyckogo universiteta. (The Bulletin of the Kalmyk University). (3): 139–151. (In Russian). 37. Orlova K.V. 2005. Opisanie mongol'skikh rukopisey i ksilografov, khranyashchikhsya na territorii Kalmykii. [The description of the Mongolian manuscripts and xylographs stored on the territory of Kalmykia]. Moscow. (In Russian). 38. Muzraeva D.N. 2012. Buddiyskie pis'mennye istochniki na tibetskom i oyratskom yazykakh v kollektsii Kalmykii. [Buddhist written sources on Tibetan and Oirat languages in the collection of Kalmykia]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 224 p. (In Russian). 39. Kichikov A.Sh. 1992. Geroicheskiy epos “Dzhangar”. Sravnitel'no-tipologicheskoe issledovanie pamyatnika. [The heroic epic “Dzhangar”. The comparative and typological study of the monument]. Moscow, Nauka Publ.: 320 p. (In Russian). 40. Bitkeev N.Ts. 1990. Kalmyckiy geroicheskiy epos “Dzhangar”: problemy tipologii nacional'nykh versiy. [Kalmyk heroic epic “Dzhangar”: typology issues of the national versions]. Elista, Kalm. Book Publ.: 155 p. (In Russian). 41. Ovalov E.B. 2008. Syuzhetno-stilevye traditsii v epose “Dzhangar” i ego versiyakh. [Narrative and stylistic traditions in the epic “Dzhangar” and its versions]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 304 p. (In Russian). 42. Pyurveeva N.B. 2003. Poetika geroicheskogo eposa “Dzhangar”. [The poetics of the heroic epic “Dzhangar”]. Elista, Dzhangar Publ.: 240 p. (In Russian). 43. Khabunova E.E. 2006. Geroicheskiy epos “Dzhangar”: poeticheskie konstanty bogatyrskogo zhiznennogo tsikla (sravnitel'noe izuchenie nacional'nykh versiy). [The heroic
Recommended publications
  • CONTENTS Contents
    CONTENTS Contents Symbols 5 Introduction 6 Players (White first) and event Opening Page 1 Gelfand – Dreev, Tilburg 1993 Semi-Slav Defence [D48] 8 2 Benjamin – Anand, Groningen PCA 1993 Sicilian Defence [B63] 13 3 Karpov – Morovi‡, Las Palmas (1) 1994 Queen’s Gambit Declined [D32] 20 4 Adams – Agdestein, Oslo (2) 1994 Alekhine Defence [B02] 25 5 Yusupov – Dokhoian, Bundesliga 1993/4 Queen’s Gambit Declined [D31] 31 6 Gelfand – Hertneck, Munich 1994 Benko Gambit [A57] 37 7 Kasparov – P. Nikoli‡, Horgen 1994 French Defence [C18] 43 8 Karpov – Salov, Buenos Aires 1994 Sicilian Defence [B66] 50 9 Timman – Topalov, Moscow OL 1994 King’s Indian Defence [E87] 56 10 Shirov – Piket, Aruba (4) 1995 Semi-Slav Defence [D44] 60 11 Kasparov – Anand, Riga 1995 Evans Gambit [C51] 66 12 J. Polgar – Korchnoi, Madrid 1995 Caro-Kann Defence [B19] 71 13 Kramnik – Piket, Dortmund 1995 Catalan Opening [E05] 76 14 Kramnik – Vaganian, Horgen 1995 Queen’s Indian Defence [E12] 82 15 Shirov – Leko, Belgrade 1995 Ruy Lopez (Spanish) [C92] 88 16 Ivanchuk – Topalov, Wijk aan Zee 1996 English Opening [A26] 93 17 Khalifman – Short, Pärnu 1996 Queen’s Indian Defence [E12] 98 18 Kasparov – Anand, Amsterdam 1996 Caro-Kann Defence [B14] 104 19 Kasparov – Kramnik, Dos Hermanas 1996 Semi-Slav Defence [D48] 111 20 Timman – Van der Wiel, Dutch Ch 1996 Sicilian Defence [B31] 117 21 Svidler – Glek, Haifa 1996 French Defence [C07] 123 22 Torre – Ivanchuk, Erevan OL 1996 Sicilian Defence [B22] 128 23 Tiviakov – Vasiukov, Russian Ch 1996 Ruy Lopez (Spanish) [C65] 134 24 Illescas –
    [Show full text]
  • CORE STRENGTH WITHIN MONGOL DIASPORA COMMUNITIES Archaeological Evidence Places Early Stone Age Human Habitation in the Southern
    CORE STRENGTH WITHIN MONGOL DIASPORA COMMUNITIES Archaeological evidence places early Stone Age human habitation in the southern Gobi between 100,000 and 200,000 years ago 1. While they were nomadic hunter-gatherers it is believed that they migrated to southern Asia, Australia, and America through Beringia 50,000 BP. This prehistoric migration played a major role in fundamental dispersion of world population. As human migration was an essential part of human evolution in prehistoric era the historical mass dispersions in Middle Age and Modern times brought a significant influence on political and socioeconomic progress throughout the world and the latter has been studied under the Theory of Diaspora. This article attempts to analyze Mongol Diaspora and its characteristics. The Middle Age-Mongol Diaspora started by the time of the Great Mongol Empire was expanding from present-day Poland in the west to Korea in the east and from Siberia in the north to the Gulf of Oman and Vietnam in the south. Mongols were scattered throughout the territory of the Great Empire, but the disproportionately small number of Mongol conquerors compared with the masses of subject peoples and the change in Mongol cultural patterns along with influence of foreign religions caused them to fell prey to alien cultures after the decline of the Empire. As a result, modern days Hazara communities in northeastern Afghanistan and a small group of Mohol/Mohgul in India, Daur, Dongxiang (Santa), Monguor or Chagaan Monggol, Yunnan Mongols, Sichuan Mongols, Sogwo Arig, Yugur and Bonan people in China are considered as descendants of Mongol soldiers, who obeyed their Khaan’s order to safeguard the conquered area and waited in exceptional loyalty.
    [Show full text]
  • Preface We Are Pleased to Present This Collection of Scholarly Articles of the International Scientific-Practical Conference «T
    SHS Web of Conferences 8 9 , 00001 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20208900001 Conf-Corp 2020 Preface We are pleased to present this collection of scholarly articles of the International Scientific-Practical Conference «Transformation of Corporate Governance Models under the New Economic Reality» (CC-2020). The conference was held in Ural State University of Economics, Yekaterinburg, Russia, on November 20, 2020. The key topics of the Conference were: o A shift in the corporate governance paradigm in the context of the technological transformation and the coronavirus crisis; o Boards of Directors as drivers of business transformation in the new post-pandemic reality; o Modernization of the stakeholder approach in the development of corporate governance models, understanding of the interests of stakeholders and evaluation of their contribution to the formation of the value and social capital of the business; o The impact of new technologies (big data, artificial intelligence, neural networks) on the development and efficiency of corporate governance systems; o Coordination of the corporate governance system with new business formats: ecosystem, platform, distributed companies; o The impact of digitalization on the formation of strategic corporate interests of a company; o CSR and corporate strategies: problems of transformation to achieve sustainable development. The conference was attended in an online format by almost 70 participants from leading universities in 10 countries: Russia, Italy, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Belarus, Uzbekistan, Moldova, Kazakhstan, DPR. The geography of Russian participants is also extensive - Moscow, St. Petersburg, Novosibirsk, Kazan, Saratov, Khanty-Mansiysk, Elista, Omsk, Kemerovo, Ryazan, Nizhny Novgorod, Grozny and other cities. The conference was held with the informational support of the Russian Institute of Directors, NP "Elite Club of Corporate Conduct".
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Friends, Foes and Frenemies in the South
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/48241 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Stoyanov, A. Title: Russia marches South: army reform and battlefield performance in Russia’s Southern campaigns, 1695-1739 Issue Date: 2017-04-26 CHAPTER 2 FRIENDS, FOES AND FRENEMIES IN THE SOUTH If the period from the end of the seventeenth to mid eighteenth century was a chessboard, then opposite Peter’s desire to assert his authority and power over vast territory stood important political and military players who were determined to put an end to his “march”. The following chapter will be divided into several subsections, each dealing with a particular element of the complex geopolitical puzzle that the Pontic region from the first decades of the eighteenth century resembled. Firstly, the focus will be on Russia’s chief adversary – the Ottoman Empire, a foe as determined and as ambitious as the tsarist state itself. Then the main features of the Crimean Khanate, as an element of the overall Ottoman military system, will be defined. However, the Khanate was a player in its own right and pursued its own interests which will also be presented in the current chapter. Next the dissertation will outline the development and the downfall of Safavid’s military and political power, followed by the establishment of a new force under the ambitious and talented Nadir Shah. The subchapter “At the Edge of Empires - the Pontic Frontier and its People” will examine the soldiers of the steppe – Cossacks, Kalmyks, and Nogais, who were an essential element of the social and military ethos of the Pontic frontier and played crucial role in the events, which will be analyzed in detail in the second part of the research.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibetan Studies in Russia: a Brief Historical Account
    Annuaire de l'École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Section des sciences religieuses Résumé des conférences et travaux 126 | 2019 2017-2018 Religions tibétaines Tibetan studies in Russia: a brief historical account Alexander Zorin Electronic version URL: https://journals.openedition.org/asr/2498 DOI: 10.4000/asr.2498 ISSN: 1969-6329 Publisher Publications de l’École Pratique des Hautes Études Printed version Date of publication: 15 September 2019 Number of pages: 63-70 ISBN: 978-2909036-47-2 ISSN: 0183-7478 Electronic reference Alexander Zorin, “Tibetan studies in Russia: a brief historical account”, Annuaire de l'École pratique des hautes études (EPHE), Section des sciences religieuses [Online], 126 | 2019, Online since 19 September 2019, connection on 06 July 2021. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asr/2498 ; DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4000/asr.2498 Tous droits réservés : EPHE Religions tibétaines Alexander ZORIN Directeur d’études invité Institut des Manuscrits Orientaux, Académie des Sciences de la Russie, Saint-Pétersbourg Tibetan studies in Russia: a brief historical account IBETOLOGY is one of the oldest branches of Oriental studies in Russia that used to Tbe closely connected with foreign and inner policy of the Russian State starting from the late 17th century. The neighborhood with various Mongolian politia and gradual spread of Russian sovereignty upon some of them caused the necessity of studying and using Tibetan along with Mongolian, Oirat, Buryat languages and also, from the 18th century, studying Tibetan Buddhism as the dominant religion of these people. Huge collections of Tibetan texts and Tibetan arts were gradually gathered in St. Petersburg and some other cities, and the initiator of this process was Peter the Great, the first Russian emperor.
    [Show full text]
  • System Development Map 2019 / 2020 Presents Existing Infrastructure & Capacity from the Perspective of the Year 2020
    7125/1-1 7124/3-1 SNØHVIT ASKELADD ALBATROSS 7122/6-1 7125/4-1 ALBATROSS S ASKELADD W GOLIAT 7128/4-1 Novaya Import & Transmission Capacity Zemlya 17 December 2020 (GWh/d) ALKE JAN MAYEN (Values submitted by TSO from Transparency Platform-the lowest value between the values submitted by cross border TSOs) Key DEg market area GASPOOL Den market area Net Connect Germany Barents Sea Import Capacities Cross-Border Capacities Hammerfest AZ DZ LNG LY NO RU TR AT BE BG CH CZ DEg DEn DK EE ES FI FR GR HR HU IE IT LT LU LV MD MK NL PL PT RO RS RU SE SI SK SM TR UA UK AT 0 AT 350 194 1.570 2.114 AT KILDIN N BE 477 488 965 BE 131 189 270 1.437 652 2.679 BE BG 577 577 BG 65 806 21 892 BG CH 0 CH 349 258 444 1.051 CH Pechora Sea CZ 0 CZ 2.306 400 2.706 CZ MURMAN DEg 511 2.973 3.484 DEg 129 335 34 330 932 1.760 DEg DEn 729 729 DEn 390 268 164 896 593 4 1.116 3.431 DEn MURMANSK DK 0 DK 101 23 124 DK GULYAYEV N PESCHANO-OZER EE 27 27 EE 10 168 10 EE PIRAZLOM Kolguyev POMOR ES 732 1.911 2.642 ES 165 80 245 ES Island Murmansk FI 220 220 FI 40 - FI FR 809 590 1.399 FR 850 100 609 224 1.783 FR GR 350 205 49 604 GR 118 118 GR BELUZEY HR 77 77 HR 77 54 131 HR Pomoriy SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT MAP HU 517 517 HU 153 49 50 129 517 381 HU Strait IE 0 IE 385 385 IE Kanin Peninsula IT 1.138 601 420 2.159 IT 1.150 640 291 22 2.103 IT TO TO LT 122 325 447 LT 65 65 LT 2019 / 2020 LU 0 LU 49 24 73 LU Kola Peninsula LV 63 63 LV 68 68 LV MD 0 MD 16 16 MD AASTA HANSTEEN Kandalaksha Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 Avenue de Cortenbergh 100 MK 0 MK 20 20 MK 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM 1000 Brussels - BELGIUM NL 418 963 1.381 NL 393 348 245 168 1.154 NL T +32 2 894 51 00 T +32 2 209 05 00 PL 158 1.336 1.494 PL 28 234 262 PL Twitter @ENTSOG Twitter @GIEBrussels PT 200 200 PT 144 144 PT [email protected] [email protected] RO 1.114 RO 148 77 RO www.entsog.eu www.gie.eu 1.114 225 RS 0 RS 174 142 316 RS The System Development Map 2019 / 2020 presents existing infrastructure & capacity from the perspective of the year 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • R U S S I a North Caucasus: Travel Advice
    YeyskFOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE BRIEFING NOTES ROSTOVSKAYA OBLAST’ Krasnyy Yar Ozero Astrakhan’ North Caucasus:Sal’sk Munych-Gudilo Travel Advice Elista ASTRAKHANSKAYA Primorsko-Akhtarsk Yashkul’ OBLAST’ Sea of RESPUBLIKA KALMYKIYA- Krasnogvardeyskoye KHAL’MG TANGCH Tikhoretsk Divnoye Azov KRASNODARSKIY KRAY Chograyskoye Vodokhranilishche Slavyansk-na-Kubani Kropotkin Lagan’ RUSSIASvetlograd Krasnodar Anapa Krymsk Blagodarnyy Tshchikskoye Armavir Stavropol’ Vodokhranihshche Kuma RESPUBLIKA Kuban’ STAVROPOL’SKIY KRAY ADYGEYA Novorossiysk Belorechensk Budennovsk Labinsk Nevinnomyssk Kizlyarskiy Maykop Zaliv Ostrov Tyuleniy Kochubey Cherkessk CASPIAN Tuapse Georgiyevsk Pyatigorsk Ostrov Chechen’ Kislovodsk Kizlyar Karachayevsk CHECHENSKAYA SEA KARACHAYEVO- Prokhladnyy Mozdok RESPUBLIKA (CHECHNYA) Sochi C CHERKESSKAYA RESPUBLIKA Nal’chik A Mount RESPUBLIKA Gudermes BLACK KABARDINO- INGUSHETIYA Groznyy El’brus Khasavyurt BALKARSKAYA Nazran Argun U RESPUBLIKA ABKHAZIA Ardon Magas SEA RESPUBLIKA Urus-Martan Makhachkala SEVERNAYA Vladikavkaz Kaspiysk COSETIYA-ALANIYA (NORTH OSSETIA) Buynaksk RESPUBLIKA A DAGESTAN International Boundary Khebda Autonomous Republic Boundary S Russian Federal Subject Boundary GEORGIA Derbent National Capital U Administrative Centre Other Town Advise against all travel Major Road AJARIA TBILISI S Rail Advise against all but essential travel 0 50miles See our travel advice before travelling 0 100kilometres TURKEY AZERBAIJAN FCO 279 Edition 1 (September 2011) Users should note that this map has been designed for briefing purposes only and it should not be used for determining the precise location of places or features. This map should not be considered an authority on the delimination of international boundaries or on the spelling of place and feature names. Maps produced for I&TD Information Management Depertment are not to be taken as necessarily representing the views of the UK government on boundaries or political status © Crown Copyright 2011.
    [Show full text]
  • Association for Russian Centers for the Religious Studies the 5Th Congress of Russian Scholars of Religion November 26–28
    Религиоведение. 2020. № 1 Religiovedenie [Study of Religion]. 2020. No. 1 DOI: 10.22250/2072-8662.2020.1.152-154 Association for Russian Centers for the Religious Studies The 5th Congress of Russian Scholars of Religion November 26–28, 2020 Saint Petersburg The State Museum of the History of Religion “RELIGION AND ATHEISM IN 21st CENTURY” Association for Russian Centers for the Religious Studies announces The 5th Congress of Russian Scholars of Religion. The 5th Congress continues the series of scholarly events being started at the 1st Congress (St-Petersburg, 2012) and afterwards kept up at the 2nd (St. Petersburg, 2014), the 3d (Vladimir, 2016) and the 4th (Blagoveshchensk, 2018) Congresses. The Congresses provides an interdisciplinary platform to discuss a great variety of problems, trends and phenomena in the field of contemporary Religious Studies, being the complex research area, methodologically based on humanities, social sciences and also, particularly during the last decades, on natural science. Previous Congresses took in participants from many cities of Russia, including Moscow, St. Petersburg, Arkhangelsk, Barnaul, Blagoveshchensk, Chita , Elista, Kazan, Khabarovsk, Krasnoyarsk, Murmansk, Nizhny Novgorod, Novgorod Veliky, Novosibirsk, Omsk, Oryol, Perm, Ryazan, Saratov, Sevastopol, Tambov, Tomsk, Tyumen, Ufa, Vladimir, Vladivostok, Volgograd, Voronezh, Yakutsk, Yaroslavl, Yekaterinburg. The scholars from Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, China, Denmark, Germany, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Sweden, Ukraine and United Kingdom have traditionally contributed to the Congresses work. The Organizing Committee of the 5th Congress of Russian Scholars of Religion is happy to welcome all the scholars interested in Religious Studies from Russian Federation and other countries. Young scholars, postgraduate and graduate students are especially encouraged to contribute to the 5th Congress work.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Inner Asia
    This page intentionally left blank A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA Geographically and historically Inner Asia is a confusing area which is much in need of interpretation.Svat Soucek’s book offers a short and accessible introduction to the history of the region.The narrative, which begins with the arrival of Islam, proceeds chrono- logically, charting the rise and fall of the changing dynasties, the Russian conquest of Central Asia and the fall of the Soviet Union. Dynastic tables and maps augment and elucidate the text.The con- temporary focus rests on the seven countries which make up the core of present-day Eurasia, that is Uzbekistan, Kazakstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Sinkiang, and Mongolia. Since 1991, there has been renewed interest in these countries which has prompted considerable political, cultural, economic, and religious debate.While a vast and divergent literature has evolved in consequence, no short survey of the region has been attempted. Soucek’s history of Inner Asia promises to fill this gap and to become an indispensable source of information for anyone study- ing or visiting the area. is a bibliographer at Princeton University Library. He has worked as Central Asia bibliographer at Columbia University, New York Public Library, and at the University of Michigan, and has published numerous related articles in The Journal of Turkish Studies, The Encyclopedia of Islam, and The Dictionary of the Middle Ages. A HISTORY OF INNER ASIA Princeton University Cambridge, New York, Melbourne, Madrid, Cape Town, Singapore, São Paulo Cambridge University Press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge , United Kingdom Published in the United States by Cambridge University Press, New York www.cambridge.org Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9780521651691 © Cambridge University Press 2000 This book is in copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Integration and Separation of 'Language': Language Policies Of
    Integration and Separation of ‘Language’: Language Policies of Mongolian Peoples in the USSR and Mongolia, 1920–1940 ARAI Yukiyasu Introduction To define what is a language is very difficult. There are many aspects that are relevant to this question. One approach is that a particular language is completely different from others. Another is that a language is similar to adjacent languages but still calls itself a language. There are also some cases in the world where there are debates whether a vernacular in discussion is a language or a dialect. In this paper, therefore, I would like to discuss a case of Mongolian peoples where three written ‘languages’ came into being from people who had obscure ethnic boundaries but were united in one written language. There are no studies, which deal with the language policy of all the Mongolian peoples as a whole. But for the whole of the Soviet Union in this period, we can refer to the writings of V.M. Alpatov and M.I. Isaev.1 For other groups of people like Turks, there are a lot of books and papers which deal with the language policy of that group as a whole like Winner, Smith or Şimşir and books on orthographies of Turkic peoples.2 For the creation of alphabets for minority peoples (with populations less than 50,000), a paper by O.A. Kazakevich gives a very useful list that describes which language had (and has) an alphabet, in which script and in which 1 V. M. Al pa t ov, 150 iazykov i politika: 1917–2000 (Moscow 2000); M.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Kalmyk Culture (2011)
    37th w Jer e se N y Folk Festival Celebrating Kalmyk Saturday,Folk Culture th Saturday,April April 24 30th, 2011 2 New Jersey Folk Festival • April 2011 NEW JERSEY FOLK FESTIVAL April 2011 4 Welcome Letter from the Festival Manager 5 Welcome Letter from the Mayor 6 Welcome Letter from the Governor 7 About the Festival: A Student Run Event History of the Festival 8 Heritage Spotlight Kalmykia 11 Heritage Area Exhibitors 13 Presenting our Performers 20 Singer-Songwriter Showcase Winners 22 Jam Sessions 23 Awards & Honorees 25 Emcees & Facilitators 26 NJFF 2011 Committee 27 For Your Information 28 Sponsors & Donors 30 Craft Market Vendors 32 Loree Building Presentations 34 Narrative Stage 36 Food Vendors 37 Children’s Area 38 Stage Schedule Back Cover Site Map 732-932-5775 [email protected] http://njfolkfest.rutgers.edu OFFICIAL PROGRAM BOOK OF THE NEW JERSEY FOLK FESTIVAL Table of Contents 3 Dear Friends, I would like to welcome you all to the 37th annual New Jersey Folk Festival! The festival has been the most important part of my undergraduate career and I take much pride in sharing it with you. To all the first time festival-goers, my fellow committee members and I hope that you enjoy the exciting performances and activi- ties we have to offer. To all our returning visitors, I hope this festival experience is the best yet! The New Jersey Folk Festival is the largest and oldest continually held festival of its kind in New Jersey. The event is the result of the hard work put in by fifteen undergraduate students throughout the fall and spring se- mesters.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Kalmyk Language
    Seth Cable Field Methods Spring 2016 Ling404 Some Basic Background on the Kalmyk Language 1 1. Genetic Affiliation The Kalmyk language (/χalymg keln/) is the westernmost member of the Mongolic languages. (1) Map of the Mongolic Language Family 2 The internal classifications within Mongolic are controversial, but the following is one proposal Mongolic Dagur Central Southern Moghol Western Central Eastern Northern Oriat, Kalkha (Mongolian), Kharchin Buryat Kalmyk, Ordos, Korchin, … … … 1 The information in this handout is taken from such sources as Knyazev (2015), Bläsing (2003), and the articles “Kalmyk Oriat” and “Kalmyk People” on Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/). 2 “Linguistic map of the Mongolic languages” by Maximilian Dörrbecker. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongolic_languages#/media/File:Linguistic_map_of_the_Mongolic_languages.png 1 Seth Cable Field Methods Spring 2016 Ling404 (2) Some Features of the Mongolic Languages The following are features common in the Mongolic languages; we should therefore be on the look for them in Kalmyk. a. Agglutinative, suffixal morphology Both nouns and verbs can appear with a string of suffixes, with little contextual allomorphy or irregularity. b. Rich case system on nouns. c. Head-Final Word Order Sentences are typically verb-final; the languages have postpositions rather than prepositions; etc. d. Front vowels can be rounded (/y/, /ø/) e. Vowel harmony The vowels of suffixes are subject to phonological rules that make them ‘match’ the vowels of the root. 2. Sociolinguistic Properties (3) Locations Spoken: Principally the Republic of Kalmykia in the Russian Federation 2 Seth Cable Field Methods Spring 2016 Ling404 (4) Dialects Spoken a. Dörbet (spoken mainly in the west) b.
    [Show full text]