DOCSLIB.ORG

Giant Maps Europe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Giant Maps Europe KILOMETERS KILOMETERS 70° 55° 50°W 45° 40° 80° 35° 30° 25° 20° 15° 10° 5°W 0° 5°E 10° 15° 20° 25° 30° 35° 40° 45° 50° 55° 60° 65° 70° 75° 80° 85° 90° 95°E 100°E 400 300 200 100 400 300 200 100 0 0 75° 80° 75° 70° STATUTE MILES STATUTE STATUTE MILES STATUTE Ostrova Belaya Zemlya A 400 300 200 100 400 300 200 100 0 0 Ostrov Rudolph AZIMUTHAL EQUIDISTANT PROJECTION EQUIDISTANT AZIMUTHAL AZIMUTHAL EQUIDISTANT PROJECTION EQUIDISTANT AZIMUTHAL Ost Ostrov Graham rov Bell Ostrov Vize (London) J No shoes or writing utensils on map on utensils writing or shoes No ack son Meridian of Greenwich E Zemlya Wilczek n E NE W A Ostrov N NW D A N a Salisbury F Arctic Ocean Ostrov Hall I SE SW r S e O I D) c c S NW N Ostrov Arthur N t E Ostrov A S S O A NE ) i S T c Zemlya George Hooker T L SW N F W SE E E A 55° 65° A R A S A Burkhta Tikhaya F J O 65° Zemlya Alexandra A Y Z Russia L N L A N Sjuøyane E M F R U Z ( Ostrov Victoria N Lågøya Kvitøya N Storøya D T Danskøya R A I Nordaustlandet 95°E C E L Denmark A Nuuk L B Ny Ålesund A (Godth˚ab) E A E L Spitsbergen Norway Kongsøya R 50° A Prins Karls Forland Svenskøya Y L A Kong Karls R L Longyearbyen Barentsøya Land Ostrov Pankrat'yeva A E V Barentsburg E K A M A ( S G E Edgeøya S E D Z 90° K N A A Sørkappøya Hopen L E A 45° S Y N E L S C A IR E T C E N IC T E V E C B A R R A R O A R C T IC G Bjørnøya N C IR (Bear Island) 85° C L E E D e Ostrov n m a r k Belush'ya Guba S t Vaygach r a i 60° 40° t Jan Mayen E Norway Ostrov Mezhdusharskiy Vorkuta 60° A a y E h Cape a Nort k B s r N S H Berlev˚ag Kolguyev ' Ob e a E Island 80° iða i S mm l Ob fj l´o ør e e örð f øy rf a A ur na a es a E u´ Lop t E Varanger Pen. m r E H ph den e d Nar’yan Mar N av jor r e erf z n Inta Faxafl´oi t VadsøE g an Ribachiy in o u A ar Cape Laydennyy lk l o Reykjavík V u T T u n d r a U E Peninsula k a E Lakselv a i B o l' s h e z e m e l' s k a y a l M Keflavík E I E EKirkenes e h E Usinskn u M n p Akureyri Alta a E i I Cape Kanin Nos s C c i n E E E A E E n 35° C A G Tromsø i Synya Kharlovka a A E E Ust’ Usa Nikel' Polyarnyy E n Yermitsa e s Karasjok K E e E T Inari E E n E Cape Svyatoy Nos P P a Pechora L le Kaamanen Murmansk Chesha Volonga a R r˚a Bay r V A te o B s es Ve h tm W I E c N A i e I an Y D nae Ivalo P yja r D E N E Su Neskaupstaður R rtsey A KOLA E n E E E te m A E o n Abisko Monchegorsk E L Ponoy f e E O o rd D E Kirovsk S Ust’ Tsil’ma H¨ofn L fjo V h st Ponoy s Ve E M Apatity PENINSULA EKoyda y P E a t Kiruna r N I Kittil¨a EKandalaksha E a E EMezen’ Bodø L E A A E Kamenka n 75° a K Umba T Sosnogorsk E and EE ala I G¨allivare N k n sh E A B a Ukhta Troitsko Pechorsk I ay s H EVoyvozh h C R i E S m L ARCTIC CIRCLE W Mo i Rana N Rovaniemi EUROPEASIA E R Lake i Pya Dv ina EKoslan d Ba E i y E g l A Solovetskiye Archangel Mosjøen N Lake E a E e o W Boden E Top Is. E E b 30° EKemi Kem’ ENovodvinsk Vendenga d o N T E ELule˚a d E g Arvidsjaur Pozheg 55° Severodvinsk e rsk E h E he M g O is Storuman E Pite˚a lu E ne c nov O E EOu B ga EKras Belomorsk ay E y ZheleznodorozhnyyMikun’ L Onega S FAROE ISLANDS Liminka E e sos I A V E m ESkellefte˚a ENa E Syktyvkar E I E a d I G¨addede Raahe Paavola S d T g ro E ev n N E er e n E O Denmark C d R O nay EGayny Lake h T´orshavn he Steinkjer Kajaani a E s i E Segezha n Dv Dvinskoy c a 55° m H ina y E s Vyg eg l f a EPlesetsk V a jo w l r T Kokkola m Solikamsk E d E N E E o a e Kristiansund D D a Gubakha n Nurmes E Ume˚a a K Berezniki E g O L E l i E Jakobstad E a U s Trondheim V Ur A E Kotlas E E B EKudymkar E Medvezh'yegorsk E E &Alesund o¨ n ¨Ostersund E U E Storsj ¨Ornsk¨oldsvik EVaasa EKuopio Kizema Luza a EKirs 70° E I E E Velikiy tk Chusovoy Kramfors F E a ’ E SHETLAND O E Sein¨ajoki Kondopoga y Joensuu E EVel’sk Ustyug n E rm Røros V Pe N sk O Kargopol’ r U p p e r ’ ISLANDS N Kungur al E G E Jyv¨askyl¨a E E r Florø E E a e u E l E Sundsvall Lake L E o ˚a n o K a m a v C Mainland m h r e Onega Konosha Rh e E Petrozavodsk P a F k t F Savonlinna u Murashi E E E g Vytegra S r Glazov Polevskoy Sognefjorde o Rockall E n L Mikkeli E E U p l a n d T Lerwick d N Kirovo Chepetsk U. K. E Kirov E E i Podporozh’ye E E U Tampere E S Lillehammer A Bolln¨as Pori Imatra Lake Beloye E Mainland Bergen N ER Lake P hE D E en Gjøvik E E E Kotel’nic I d E G Rauma Lahti s Lappeenranta Ladoga 25° St. Kilda R Bjørnafjorden jor E a u Belozersk Lewis E rf H¨ameenlinna p E B rnoway Pe ge Mjøsa a l E A E ESto h nt KirkwallORKNEY ISLANDS n S Shar’yaE Izhevsk I c Thurso la da E W FalunE EG¨avle E H in E nd r Odda Sokol E ESovetsk E M F a Hønefoss E Borl¨ange E Kotka Vologda Neftekamsk R e ir H E h th Haugesund "ALAND IS. Turku St. PetersburgE V E T Helsinki E VolkhovE E ya T E Drammen A A D E Tikhvin t C N E k A E Cherepovets Buy a U E Oslo L sk IN Lomonosov n O h E F S Pushkin i ir I ray Firt Uppsala F yb o E S Mo n O R rv E E B afjorde E F e E EInverness okn Skien E Karlstad en L Narva E N es E ID Stavanger E E lar U Tallinn E R Naberezhnyye E H i g h l a n d s Fredrikstad Eskilstuna M¨a G A E Ufa Magnitogorsk R Rattray Head E ELiding¨o e E I Beloretsk B Egersund E rv NERybinsk Kostroma Chelny E S A Jä E E ¨Orebro A a- Slantsy Kineshma H Stockholm ht Yoshkar Ola N T n Ko s E E r A E E EBorovichi EKazan’ R M t s. E S e Hiiumaa E E a n Aberdeen Arendal n Luga ECheboksary E p i V¨a Velikiy l 50°N N a m E Yaroslavl’ Oktyabr’skiy E r Uddevalla G Perth Kristiansand E E E NIA L L. Peipus Bezhatsk E E O l N ST a E I Greenock SCOTLAND E Lidk E Novgorod E Nizhniy Malin Head ö E g E No shoes or writing utensils on map No E E E ping Norrk¨oping Trollh¨attan E E E l Ivanovo Shuya E Sibay l K Tartu i o E Al’met’yevsk Dundee P¨arnu a Londonderry A P E A V Novgorod Kanash R r E NORTH GER V¨attern Link¨oping Lake Staraya Russa Sterlitamak G A S U la SK G¨oteborg S Pskov H Donegal Bay sgow E Saaremaa E E k Salavat C J¨onk¨oping Vyshniy Volochek a E Kuybyshevs (Sligeach) (Derry) E Edinburgh Frederikshavn& E E k Pavlovo v Ayr U E zhok o E Pskov r E N E GOTLAND To E Kovrov O n E 65° NORTHERN N I E E ya Buguruslan Sligo T E C Valmiera i l’ Dimitrovgrad 50°N . E Visby EArzamas r E Belfast Dumfries D Gulf of E U C E Tver’ E Alatyr’ E E E a Murom Reservoir IRELAND h Newcastle &Alborg Ventspils Riga Vladimir E C d N C a E E k n upon Tyne I (Gaillimh) GREAT KATTEGAT d s n E Viborg E A E E it e SEA E V¨axj¨o Rīga Samara Buzuluk o ERanders I l Rzhev E Galway l E EHalmstad A E tr (Baile R¯ezekne Middlesborough E n o ( É E Douglas E E ET LATVIA E ESaransk v Dublin Kalmar ¨OLAND a Togliatti Mednogorsko IRE) Átha Cliath) CIsle Sunderland E E Jelgava Velikiye Luki P N Loop Head (Doolish) of Man &Arhus T Liep¯aja Moscow EKolomna Orenburg map on writing utensils shoes or No E D V (Tr IRELAND IRISH SEA JUTLAND E N M E L á L A R K E Karlskrona ESasovo a í) Tralee A Esbjerg E L EDaugavpils E ERyazan’ ELimerick K Kristianstad E EVyaz’ma Šiauliai a E Bradford I Copenhagen A (Luimneach) N A E g Liverpool G E E E l E E Panev˙ežys O Serpukhov E l Odense o EE BRITAINDO ZEALAND A Klaip˙eda E Safonovo Penza Stoke-on-TrentE Leeds M Malm¨o Navapolatsk Polatsk E E V a EManchester FYN B Vitsyebsk E E Kaluga E ENovomoskovsk E Pugachev E E EWaterford E BORNHOLM B Tula N Cork Smolensk L O p E Oral (Port L Sheffield Denmark LITHUANIA A D 20° (Corcaigh) WALES E Sovetsk E E R E R Morshansk- N áirge) B Kaunas Orsha T K A E Balakovo E el (CYMRU) E re Kaliningrad Vilnius N O Serdobsk nn Nottingham m Kiel C EChernyakhovsk A E E a ENGLAND e E Russia C EMichurinskE E U A Ch rh Słupsk E EMaladzecha Kamenka ’s a E Rasskazovo ge Swansea B E s i a n I s.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arctic Expedition12° 16° 20° 24° 28° 32° Spitsbergen U Svalbard Archipelago 80° 80°
    distinguished travel for more than 35 years Voyage UNDER THE Midnight Sun Arctic Expedition12° 16° 20° 24° 28° 32° Spitsbergen u Svalbard Archipelago 80° 80° 80° Raudfjorden Nordaustlandet Woodfjorden Smeerenburg Monaco Glacier The Arctic’s 79° 79° 79° Kongsfjorden Svalbard King’s Glacier Archipelago Ny-Ålesund Spitsbergen Longyearbyen Canada 78° 78° 78° i Greenland tic C rcle rc Sea Camp Millar A U.S. North Pole Russia Bellsund Calypsobyen Svalbard Archipelago Norway Copenhagen Burgerbukta 77° 77° 77° Cruise Itinerary Denmark Air Routing Samarin Glacier Hornsund Barents Sea June 20 to 30, 2022 4° 8° Spitsbergen12° u Samarin16° Glacier20° u Calypsobyen24° 76° 28° 32° 36° 76° Voyage across the Arctic Circle on this unique 11-day Monaco Glacier u Smeerenburg u Ny-Ålesund itinerary featuring a seven-night cruise round trip Copenhagen 1 Depart the U.S. or Canada aboard the Five-Star Le Boréal. Visit during the most 2 Arrive in Copenhagen, Denmark enchanting season, when the region is bathed in the magical 3 Copenhagen/Fly to Longyearbyen, Spitsbergen, light of the Midnight Sun. Cruise the shores of secluded Norway’s Svalbard Archipelago/Embark Le Boréal 4 Hornsund for Burgerbukta/Samarin Glacier Spitsbergen—the jewel of Norway’s rarely visited Svalbard 5 Bellsund for Calypsobyen/Camp Millar archipelago enjoy expert-led Zodiac excursions through 6 Cruising the Arctic Ice Pack sandstone mountain ranges, verdant tundra and awe-inspiring 7 MåkeØyane/Woodfjorden/Monaco Glacier ice formations. See glaciers calve in luminous blues and search 8 Raudfjorden for Smeerenburg for Arctic wildlife, including the “King of the Arctic,” the 9 Ny-Ålesund/Kongsfjorden for King’s Glacier polar bear, whales, walruses and Svalbard reindeer.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTENTS Contents
    CONTENTS Contents Symbols 5 Introduction 6 Players (White first) and event Opening Page 1 Gelfand – Dreev, Tilburg 1993 Semi-Slav Defence [D48] 8 2 Benjamin – Anand, Groningen PCA 1993 Sicilian Defence [B63] 13 3 Karpov – Morovi‡, Las Palmas (1) 1994 Queen’s Gambit Declined [D32] 20 4 Adams – Agdestein, Oslo (2) 1994 Alekhine Defence [B02] 25 5 Yusupov – Dokhoian, Bundesliga 1993/4 Queen’s Gambit Declined [D31] 31 6 Gelfand – Hertneck, Munich 1994 Benko Gambit [A57] 37 7 Kasparov – P. Nikoli‡, Horgen 1994 French Defence [C18] 43 8 Karpov – Salov, Buenos Aires 1994 Sicilian Defence [B66] 50 9 Timman – Topalov, Moscow OL 1994 King’s Indian Defence [E87] 56 10 Shirov – Piket, Aruba (4) 1995 Semi-Slav Defence [D44] 60 11 Kasparov – Anand, Riga 1995 Evans Gambit [C51] 66 12 J. Polgar – Korchnoi, Madrid 1995 Caro-Kann Defence [B19] 71 13 Kramnik – Piket, Dortmund 1995 Catalan Opening [E05] 76 14 Kramnik – Vaganian, Horgen 1995 Queen’s Indian Defence [E12] 82 15 Shirov – Leko, Belgrade 1995 Ruy Lopez (Spanish) [C92] 88 16 Ivanchuk – Topalov, Wijk aan Zee 1996 English Opening [A26] 93 17 Khalifman – Short, Pärnu 1996 Queen’s Indian Defence [E12] 98 18 Kasparov – Anand, Amsterdam 1996 Caro-Kann Defence [B14] 104 19 Kasparov – Kramnik, Dos Hermanas 1996 Semi-Slav Defence [D48] 111 20 Timman – Van der Wiel, Dutch Ch 1996 Sicilian Defence [B31] 117 21 Svidler – Glek, Haifa 1996 French Defence [C07] 123 22 Torre – Ivanchuk, Erevan OL 1996 Sicilian Defence [B22] 128 23 Tiviakov – Vasiukov, Russian Ch 1996 Ruy Lopez (Spanish) [C65] 134 24 Illescas –
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Digitalization
    E3S Web of Conferences 295, 01034 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202129501034 WFSDI 2021 Quality of Life of the Population: the Impact of Digitalization Adigam Barlybaev1,2, Zulfiya Ishnazarova1,2, and Inna Sitnova1,2 1Institute of strategic research of the Republic of Bashkortostan, 453837 Sibay, Russia 2Bashkir state University, Sibay Institute (branch), 453838 Sibay, Russia Abstract. The article analyzes the impact of digitalization on the life population quality, identifies areas, identifies the positive and negative impact of digitalization on the qualitative characteristics of the population’s life. The life quality is one of the important indicators of the level of development of society; it is a complex systemic integral characteristic of satisfaction with material and non-material factors of life of the population living in a certain territory. Since the environment and environmental conditions are constantly changing, various trends and patterns occur, the trends and requirements of our time, inevitably affect the life quality. One of such conditions, gaining momentum at the present time, is digitalization. Digitalization is the introduction of modern digital technologies in various spheres of life and production. Currently, in all types and levels of economic processes in the world and in individual countries, the so-called "digitalization" is gaining momentum - the active use of information and communication technologies. There is a need to accept digitalization as a universal process, adapt to it and use its levers for the best possible result for society. In nine areas, digitalization directly affects the life quality - the city, education, healthcare, economy, finance, information systems, infrastructure, business, and agriculture.
    [Show full text]
  • Balakovo OSART Report Final
    INTRODUCTION AND MAIN CONCLUSIONS INTRODUCTION At the request of the government of the Russian Federation, an IAEA Operational Safety Review Team (OSART) of international experts visited Balakovo Nuclear Power Plant from 19 May to 5 June 2008. The purpose of the mission was to review operating practices in the areas of Management organization and administration; Training and qualification; Operations; Maintenance; Technical support; Radiation protection; Operating experience and Chemistry. In addition, an exchange of technical experience and knowledge took place between the experts and their plant counterparts on how the common goal of excellence in operational safety could be further pursued. The Balakovo OSART mission was the 146 th in the programme, which began in 1982. The team was composed of experts from Bulgaria, China, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Hungary, Slovak Republic, United States of America and together with the IAEA staff members and observers from France and IAEA. The collective nuclear power experience of the team was approximately 280 years. Balakovo NPP is located on the left bank of the Saratov Reservoir of the Volga River 900 km South-East from Moscow. Balakovo NPP is part of the nuclear utility Rosenergoatom. The plant has four 1000 MWe VVER type units in operation. The units were commissioned in 1985, 1987, 1988 and 1993. The plant has 4450 employees. Following the request of Balakovo NPP and Rosenergoatom the OSART mission was conducted on unit 4 and common site systems. Before visiting the plant, the team studied information provided by the IAEA and the Balakovo plant to familiarize themselves with the plant's main features and operating performance, staff organization and responsibilities, and important programmes and procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Risk Index 120 Amundsen Sea 90 60 30 0 30 60 90 120
    COUNTRY RISK MAP 2010 150 120 90 60 30 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 ARCTIC OCEAN FRANZ JOSEF ARCTIC OCEAN LAND SEVERNAYA ARCTIC OCEAN ZEMLYA Ellesmere Island QUEEN ELIZABETH Longyearbyen NEW SIBERIAN ISLANDS Svalbard NOVAYA Kara Sea ISLANDS Greenland Sea ZEMLYA Laptev Sea Banks (NORWAY) Barents Sea Island Greenland East Siberian Sea Beaufort Sea Ban Wrangel (DENMARK) Island Victoria Bay Island Ban Jan Mayen Norwegian Chukchi (NORWAY) Island Sea Sea Arctic Circle (66°33') Arctic Circle (66°33') NORWAY Great Nuuk ICELAND White Sea U. S. Bear Lake (Godthåb) SWEDEN Provideniya Davis Denmark Strait Reykjavík Faroe Islands FINLAND Lake Strait (DEN.) Gulf R U S S I A Tórshavn of Ladoga Lake Great Bothnia Onega Slave Lake Hudson Oslo Helsinki 60 60 Bay Stockholm Tallinn Gulf of Alaska Rockall EST. Labrador (U.K.) Baltic Bering Sea Riga S North Sea LAT. Sea DENMARK Moscow Sea Copenhagen LITH. Lake RUSSIA Sea of C A N A D A UNITED Vilnius Baikal S Minsk N D Dublin Isle of KINGDOM S Okhotsk LA Man IS (U.K.) BELARUS T IA N Lake IRELAND Amsterdam Berlin Warsaw U.S. LE U Winnipeg Kamchatskiy A NETH. Astana Sakhalin A Island of L D S London Brussels POLAND E U T A N GERMANY Prague Kyiv I A N I S L Newfoundland Celtic BELGIUM LUX. Sea Guernsey (U.K.) Luxembourg CZECH REP. U K R A I N E Jersey (U.K.) SLOVAKIA Gulf of Paris Vienna Bratislava S K A Z A K H S T A N Ulaanbaatar KURIL Lake St.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrialization of Housing Construction As a Tool for Sustainable Settlement and Rural Areas Development
    E3S Web of Conferences 164, 07010 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf /202016407010 TPACEE-2019 Industrialization of housing construction as a tool for sustainable settlement and rural areas development Olga Popova1,*, Polina Antufieva1 , Vladimir Grebenshchikov2 and Mariya Balmashnova2 1Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, 163002, Severnaya Dvina Emb., 17, Arkhangelsk, Russia 2 Moscow State University of Civil Engineering, 26, Yaroslavskoeshosse, 129337, Moscow, Russia Abstract. The development of the construction industry, conducting construction in accordance with standard projects, and transforming the construction materials industry in hard-to-reach and sparsely populated areas will make significant progress in solving the housing problem. Industrialization of housing construction is a catalyst for strong growth of the region’s economy and the quality of life of citizens. The purpose of this study is to develop a methodology for assessing the level of industrialization of the territory’s construction complex and its development potential for increasing the volume of low-rise housing stock. Research tasks: 1) assessment of the need to develop housing construction, including low-rise housing, on a particular territory; 2) development of a methodology for calculating the level of industrialization of construction in the area under consideration to determine the possibility of developing low-rise housing construction in this area in the proposed way; 3) approbation of the method using the example of rural areas of the Arkhangelsk region. It was revealed that the districts of the Arkhangelsk region have medium and low levels of industrialization. The districts that are most in need of an increase in the rate of housing construction have been identified.
    [Show full text]
  • FSC National Risk Assessment
    FSC National Risk Assessment for the Russian Federation DEVELOPED ACCORDING TO PROCEDURE FSC-PRO-60-002 V3-0 Version V1-0 Code FSC-NRA-RU National approval National decision body: Coordination Council, Association NRG Date: 04 June 2018 International approval FSC International Center, Performance and Standards Unit Date: 11 December 2018 International contact Name: Tatiana Diukova E-mail address: [email protected] Period of validity Date of approval: 11 December 2018 Valid until: (date of approval + 5 years) Body responsible for NRA FSC Russia, [email protected], [email protected] maintenance FSC-NRA-RU V1-0 NATIONAL RISK ASSESSMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2018 – 1 of 78 – Contents Risk designations in finalized risk assessments for the Russian Federation ................................................. 3 1 Background information ........................................................................................................... 4 2 List of experts involved in risk assessment and their contact details ........................................ 6 3 National risk assessment maintenance .................................................................................... 7 4 Complaints and disputes regarding the approved National Risk Assessment ........................... 7 5 List of key stakeholders for consultation ................................................................................... 8 6 List of abbreviations and Russian transliterated terms* used ................................................... 8 7 Risk assessments
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Forest Sector in the Arkhangelsk Oblast During the Transition Period of the 1990S
    Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s ALBINA PASHKEVICH Pashkevich Albina (2003). Development of forest sector in the Arkhangelsk oblast during the transition period of the 1990s. Fennia 181: 1, pp. 13–24. Helsinki. ISSN 0015-0010. The Arkhangelsk oblast has long been one of Russia’s most important forest industrial regions. This paper analyses the changes in accessibility of forest resources and forest commodity production during the transition period in the 1990s. Special attention is given to firm restructuring, active roles of domestic capital and the different survival strategies that have been developed by in- dustries in the region. Further analysis deals with signs of economic recovery in the forest sector due to the processes of restructuring, modernisation and self-organisation. Albina Pashkevich, Spatial Modelling Centre (SMC), Department of Social and Economic Geography, Umeå University, Box 839, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]. MS received 12 August 2002. Introduction adoption of a new. Some suggest that this proc- ess has been deeply embedded in the nature of The shift from central planning to a market-based the socialist system (Dingsdale 1999; Hamilton economy in Russia culminated with the dramatic 1999) and that the legacy of the communism has economic and political reorientation that began been only partly removed, and instead has mere- in the 1990s. This transition towards a market-ori- ly been reworked in a complex way (Smith 1997). ented and outward-looking economic system led Others say that reforms have actually ended the by private sector has created new challenges and old ‘command economy’ but have instead suc- opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate in Svalbard 2100
    M-1242 | 2018 Climate in Svalbard 2100 – a knowledge base for climate adaptation NCCS report no. 1/2019 Photo: Ketil Isaksen, MET Norway Editors I.Hanssen-Bauer, E.J.Førland, H.Hisdal, S.Mayer, A.B.Sandø, A.Sorteberg CLIMATE IN SVALBARD 2100 CLIMATE IN SVALBARD 2100 Commissioned by Title: Date Climate in Svalbard 2100 January 2019 – a knowledge base for climate adaptation ISSN nr. Rapport nr. 2387-3027 1/2019 Authors Classification Editors: I.Hanssen-Bauer1,12, E.J.Førland1,12, H.Hisdal2,12, Free S.Mayer3,12,13, A.B.Sandø5,13, A.Sorteberg4,13 Clients Authors: M.Adakudlu3,13, J.Andresen2, J.Bakke4,13, S.Beldring2,12, R.Benestad1, W. Bilt4,13, J.Bogen2, C.Borstad6, Norwegian Environment Agency (Miljødirektoratet) K.Breili9, Ø.Breivik1,4, K.Y.Børsheim5,13, H.H.Christiansen6, A.Dobler1, R.Engeset2, R.Frauenfelder7, S.Gerland10, H.M.Gjelten1, J.Gundersen2, K.Isaksen1,12, C.Jaedicke7, H.Kierulf9, J.Kohler10, H.Li2,12, J.Lutz1,12, K.Melvold2,12, Client’s reference 1,12 4,6 2,12 5,8,13 A.Mezghani , F.Nilsen , I.B.Nilsen , J.E.Ø.Nilsen , http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/M1242 O. Pavlova10, O.Ravndal9, B.Risebrobakken3,13, T.Saloranta2, S.Sandven6,8,13, T.V.Schuler6,11, M.J.R.Simpson9, M.Skogen5,13, L.H.Smedsrud4,6,13, M.Sund2, D. Vikhamar-Schuler1,2,12, S.Westermann11, W.K.Wong2,12 Affiliations: See Acknowledgements! Abstract The Norwegian Centre for Climate Services (NCCS) is collaboration between the Norwegian Meteorological In- This report was commissioned by the Norwegian Environment Agency in order to provide basic information for use stitute, the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate, Norwegian Research Centre and the Bjerknes in climate change adaptation in Svalbard.
    [Show full text]
  • Komi Aluminium Programme [EBRD
    Komi Aluminium Komi Aluminium Programme PROPOSED EARLY WORKS PROGRAMME FOR THE PROPOSED SOSNOGORSK REFINERY SITE Environmental Analysis IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCE CORPORATION AND EUROPEAN BANK FOR RECONSTRUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS Prepared By: CSIR ENVIRONMENTEK P.O. Box 395 Pretoria 0001 Contact Person: Rob Hounsome Tel: +27 31 242-2300 Fax: +27 31 261-2509 Email: [email protected] In Partnership with: DewPoint International (Colorado) DATE: April 2004 Final Table of Contents 1 Introduction......................................................................................................................................- 3 - 2 Scope of the Early Works..............................................................................................................- 3 - 3 Impacts associated with the Early Works...................................................................................- 4 - 4 Background......................................................................................................................................- 5 - 4.1 The developer...............................................................................................................................- 6 - 4.2 Environmental and social assessment studies...........................................................................- 6 - 5 The Proposed Site...........................................................................................................................- 7 - 5.1 Location........................................................................................................................................-
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Greek Culture Representation in Socio-Economic Development of the Southern Regions of Russia
    European Research Studies Journal Volume XXI, Special Issue 1, 2018 pp. 136 - 147 The Role of Greek Culture Representation in Socio-Economic Development of the Southern Regions of Russia T.V. Evsyukova1, I.G. Barabanova2, O.V. Glukhova3, E.A. Cherednikova4 Abstract: This article researches how the Greek lingvoculture represented in onomasticon of the South of Russia. The South Russian anthroponyms, toponyms and pragmatonyms are considered in this article and how they verbalize the most important values and ideological views. It is proved in the article that the key concepts of the Greek lingvoculture such as: “Peace”, “Faith”, “Love”, “Heroism”, “Knowledge”, “Alphabet”, “Power”, “Charismatic person” and “Craft” are highly concentrated in the onomastic lexis of the researched region. The mentioned above concepts due to their specific pragmatic orientation are represented at different extend. Keywords: Culture, linguoculture, onomastics, concept anthroponym, toponym, pragmatonim. 1D.Sc. in Linguistics, Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. 2Ph.D. in Linguistics, Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. 3Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation, E-mail: [email protected] 4Ph.D., Associate Professor, Department of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication, Rostov State University of Economics, Rostov-on-Don, Russian Federation. T.V. Evsyukova, I.G. Barabanova, O.V. Glukhova, E.A. Cherednikova 137 1. Introduction There is unlikely to be any other culture that influenced so much on the formation of other European cultures, as the Greek culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus
    STATUS AND PROTECTION OF GLOBALLY THREATENED SPECIES IN THE CAUCASUS CEPF Biodiversity Investments in the Caucasus Hotspot 2004-2009 Edited by Nugzar Zazanashvili and David Mallon Tbilisi 2009 The contents of this book do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of CEPF, WWF, or their sponsoring organizations. Neither the CEPF, WWF nor any other entities thereof, assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, product or process disclosed in this book. Citation: Zazanashvili, N. and Mallon, D. (Editors) 2009. Status and Protection of Globally Threatened Species in the Caucasus. Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., 232 pp. ISBN 978-9941-0-2203-6 Design and printing Contour Ltd. 8, Kargareteli st., 0164 Tbilisi, Georgia December 2009 The Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF) is a joint initiative of l’Agence Française de Développement, Conservation International, the Global Environment Facility, the Government of Japan, the MacArthur Foundation and the World Bank. This book shows the effort of the Caucasus NGOs, experts, scientific institutions and governmental agencies for conserving globally threatened species in the Caucasus: CEPF investments in the region made it possible for the first time to carry out simultaneous assessments of species’ populations at national and regional scales, setting up strategies and developing action plans for their survival, as well as implementation of some urgent conservation measures. Contents Foreword 7 Acknowledgments 8 Introduction CEPF Investment in the Caucasus Hotspot A. W. Tordoff, N. Zazanashvili, M. Bitsadze, K. Manvelyan, E. Askerov, V. Krever, S. Kalem, B. Avcioglu, S. Galstyan and R. Mnatsekanov 9 The Caucasus Hotspot N.
    [Show full text]