Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Hariyo Ban Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Hariyo Ban Project Mid-Term Performance Evaluation of the Hariyo Ban Project March 2015 This report was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by ECODIT LLC for the Mid-term Performance Evaluation of the Hariyo Ban Project - Task Order No. AID-367-TO-15-00001. AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Nepal under the Restoring the Environment through Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (REPLACE) Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity Contract number OAA-I-14-00016, Task Order number AID-367-TO-15-00001, effective from January 5, 2015, through March 8, 2015, entitled “Mid-term Performance Evaluation of the Hariyo Ban Project.” This evaluation is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents of this report are the sole responsibility of ECODIT and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. PREPARED BY The Evaluation Team: Teri Allendorf, Evaluation Team Leader Madhav Karki, Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Specialist Keshav Raj Kanel, Forestry and NRM Specialist Bijay Kumar Singh, Rural Development and Livelihoods and Payton Deeks, Home Office Project Manager Cover photo: Jum Dada Jhapri Community Forestry Group discussing the Hariyo Ban Program with Dr. Keshav Kanel. Cover photo credit: Teri Allendorf/ECODIT. ECODIT LLC 1600 Wilson Blvd., Suite 1220 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | ii ~This page intentionally left blank~ USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | iii CONTENTS ACRONYMS...................................................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. X 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 EVALUATION QUESTIONS ........................................................................................................ 1 2. PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 3 2.1 INTERMEDIATE RESULTS ............................................................................................................ 3 2.2 PROJECT AREA ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 IMPLEMENTING PARTNERS ....................................................................................................... 4 3. EVALUATION METHODS & LIMITATIONS ................................................. 6 3.1 EVALUATION METHODS ........................................................................................................... 6 3.2 EVALUATION LIMITATIONS...................................................................................................... 7 4. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATIONS .............................. 9 4.1 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................................................34 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ...............................................................................................................35 ANNEX A: STATEMENT OF WORK .......................................................................... 37 ANNEX B: FINAL EVALUATION PLAN .................................................................... 46 ANNEX C: DATA COLLECTION INSTRUMENTS ................................................... 49 ANNEX D: SOURCES OF INFORMATION ................................................................ 63 ANNEX E: SUMMARY OF LISTENING SESSION FEEDBACK ............................... 72 ANNEX F: DISCLOSURE OF CONFLICTS OF INFORMATION .......................... 103 USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | iv ACRONYMS ACAP Annapurna Conservation Area Project AEPC Appropriate Energy Promotion Centre BIA Biodiversity important areas BZMC Buffer Zone Management Council BZCF Buffer Zone Community Forest BZCFUG Buffer Zone Community Forestry User Group BZUC Buffer Zone User’s Committee CAC Community Awareness Centre CAMC Conservation Area Management Committee CAPA Community Adaptation Plan of Action CAPI Climate adaptation planning and implementation CARE A US-based NGO, whose name originally stood for “Cooperative for American Remittances to Europe,” later “Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere” and now the name is used in its own right rather than as an acronym. CBA Community-based adaptation CBAPU Community-Based Anti-Poaching Unit CBNRM Community-based natural resource management CBO Community-based organizations CC Climate change CCA Climate change adaptation CDCS Country Development Cooperation Strategy CFCC Community Forest Coordination Committee CFOP Community Forestry Operation Plan CFUG Community Forest User Groups CHAL Chitwan-Annapurna Landscape CLAC Community Learning and Action Center COR Contracting Officer Representative CSO Civil society organization DFID Department for International Development, the United Kingdom’s overseas development body DFO District Forest Officer DFRS Department of Forest Research and Survey DG Director General DNPWC Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation DoF Department of Forests DPR Department of Plant Resources DRR Disaster risk reduction DSCO District Soil Conservation Office DSCWM Department of Soil Conservation and Watershed Management DWIDP Department of Water Induced Disaster Prevention EbA Ecosystem-based Adaptation (a project funded by GoN, UNDP, UNEP, and IUCN) EFLGP Environment friendly local government planning EMMP Environment Mitigation Monitoring Plan ERPD Emission Reductions Program Document ERPIN The Emissions Reduction Project Idea Note FECOFUN Federation of Community Forest User Groups Nepal FGD Focus group discussion USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | v GCC Global Climate Change GESI Gender equality and social inclusion GHG Greenhouse gas GLA Government of Nepal line agency GO Government organization GoN Government of Nepal GPS Global Positioning System HB Hariyo Ban HO Home Office IGA Income-generating activity IOF Institute of Forestry IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature Kamaiya Bonded laborers KII Key informant interview LAPA Local Adaptation Plan of Action LDO Local Development Officer LDRMP Local Disaster Risk Management Plan LFP Livelihood and Forestry Program LOE Level of effort LRP Local resource person MMHPP Madya-Marsyangdi Hydro-Power Project MoAC Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives MoE Ministry of Environment MoFALD Ministry of Federal Affairs and Local Development MoFSC Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation MoLD Ministry of Local Development MoSTE Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment MOU Memorandum of Understanding MSFP Multi-Stakeholder Forestry Programme NAPA National Adaptation Plan of Action NCCSP National Climate Change Support Project NGO Non-governmental organization NRM Natural resource management NTFP Non-timber forest products NTNC National Trust for Nature Conservation PA Protected area PAF Poverty Alleviation Fund PES Payments for Environmental (Ecosystem) Services PGA Participatory Governance Assessment PHPA Public Hearing and Public Auditing PMP Performance Management Plans PSC Program Steering Committee PWBR Participatory Well-Being Ranking RCDC Rural Community Development Centre RDWSF Rural Drinking Water Support Fund REDD Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation REDD+ REDD plus conservation, the sustainable management of forests, and the enhancement of forest carbon stocks USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | vi REPLACE Restoring the Environment through Prosperity, Livelihoods, and Conserving Ecosystems SAGUN Strengthened Actions for Governance in Utilization of Natural Resources, a USAID-funded project implemented by CARE SMF Sustainable forest management SOW Statement of Work TAL Terai Arc Landscape UCPV Underlying causes of poverty and vulnerability UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNDP United Nations Development Programme USAID US Agency for International Development USG US Government VDC Village Development Committee VIA Vulnerability Impact Assessment WOO Window of Opportunity, a special provision of HB designed to fund innovative activities through the government or NGOs to complement the core programs of HB WWF World Wildlife Fund USAID/Nepal Mid-term Performance Evaluation of Hariyo Ban Project Page | vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A diverse range of natural resource and environmental actors and stakeholders, from local community groups to central and local government agencies, willingly made time to talk to the mid-term Evaluation Team of the Hariyo Ban (HB) program and freely shared their knowledge and opinions. During the field visits, the team met and worked with numerous community members and conservation practitioners and witnessed firsthand both their successes and the challenges
Recommended publications
  • Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal
    SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics SMALL AREA ESTIMATION OF FOOD INSECURITY AND UNDERNUTRITION IN NEPAL GOVERNMENT OF NEPAL National Planning Commission Secretariat Central Bureau of Statistics Acknowledgements The completion of both this and the earlier feasibility report follows extensive consultation with the National Planning Commission, Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), World Food Programme (WFP), UNICEF, World Bank, and New ERA, together with members of the Statistics and Evidence for Policy, Planning and Results (SEPPR) working group from the International Development Partners Group (IDPG) and made up of people from Asian Development Bank (ADB), Department for International Development (DFID), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), UNICEF and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), WFP, and the World Bank. WFP, UNICEF and the World Bank commissioned this research. The statistical analysis has been undertaken by Professor Stephen Haslett, Systemetrics Research Associates and Institute of Fundamental Sciences, Massey University, New Zealand and Associate Prof Geoffrey Jones, Dr. Maris Isidro and Alison Sefton of the Institute of Fundamental Sciences - Statistics, Massey University, New Zealand. We gratefully acknowledge the considerable assistance provided at all stages by the Central Bureau of Statistics. Special thanks to Bikash Bista, Rudra Suwal, Dilli Raj Joshi, Devendra Karanjit, Bed Dhakal, Lok Khatri and Pushpa Raj Paudel. See Appendix E for the full list of people consulted. First published: December 2014 Design and processed by: Print Communication, 4241355 ISBN: 978-9937-3000-976 Suggested citation: Haslett, S., Jones, G., Isidro, M., and Sefton, A. (2014) Small Area Estimation of Food Insecurity and Undernutrition in Nepal, Central Bureau of Statistics, National Planning Commissions Secretariat, World Food Programme, UNICEF and World Bank, Kathmandu, Nepal, December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • ZSL National Red List of Nepal's Birds Volume 5
    The Status of Nepal's Birds: The National Red List Series Volume 5 Published by: The Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK Copyright: ©Zoological Society of London and Contributors 2016. All Rights reserved. The use and reproduction of any part of this publication is welcomed for non-commercial purposes only, provided that the source is acknowledged. ISBN: 978-0-900881-75-6 Citation: Inskipp C., Baral H. S., Phuyal S., Bhatt T. R., Khatiwada M., Inskipp, T, Khatiwada A., Gurung S., Singh P. B., Murray L., Poudyal L. and Amin R. (2016) The status of Nepal's Birds: The national red list series. Zoological Society of London, UK. Keywords: Nepal, biodiversity, threatened species, conservation, birds, Red List. Front Cover Back Cover Otus bakkamoena Aceros nipalensis A pair of Collared Scops Owls; owls are A pair of Rufous-necked Hornbills; species highly threatened especially by persecution Hodgson first described for science Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson and sadly now extinct in Nepal. Raj Man Singh / Brian Hodgson The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of participating organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of any participating organizations. Notes on front and back cover design: The watercolours reproduced on the covers and within this book are taken from the notebooks of Brian Houghton Hodgson (1800-1894).
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Social and Economic Benefi Ts
    60/ The Third Pole SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACT OF TOURISM IN SAURAHA CHITWAN, NEPAL Tej Prasad Sigdel Teaching Assistant, Department of Geography Education, T. U., Nepal Abstract In Nepal, the number of tourist arrivals and stay their length have been increasing day to day. This incensement has directly infl uenced the socio-economic status of Nepalese people. The main objective of this paper is to explore the socio- economic impact of tourism on Sauraha. To fulfi ll the objective both primary and secondary data had been used. There are both direct and indirect impacts on socio-economic condition of local people. Tourism has contributed a lot a raising the awareness among the communities, preserving traditional culture, values, norms and heritage. But it is also facing a problem of sanitation, improper solid waste management, unmanaged dumping site and poaching wild life. Tourism development in Sauraha should be assessed both the local traditions and culture. Key Words: Tourism, socio-economic impact, World Heritage Site, sustainable development INTRODUCTION social and economic benefi ts. Economic benefi ts are, increased government revenue through various In general term, ‘tourism’ denotes the journey of types of taxation, create a jobs and increase family human beings from one place to the another, where and community income, provide the opportunity it may be within own country or second countries for for innovation and creativity, provides the support various purposes. The word ‘Tourism’ which was th for existing business and services, helps to develop originated in the 19 century and was popularized local crafts and trade and develop international in 1930s, but its signifi cance was not fully realized peace and understanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Problems and Prospects of Tourism in Sauraha Vdc A
    PROBLEMS AND PROSPECTS OF TOURISM IN SAURAHA VDC A Thesis Submitted to Central Department of Economics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Arts in Economics Submitted By RekhaGautam TU Regd. No.:6-1-19-333-2006 Roll No.: 37/2068 Central Department of Economics Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences Tribhuvan University Kirtipur, Kathmandu, Nepal February 2017 1 LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION This thesis entitled Problems and Prospects of Tourism in Sauraha has been prepared by Mrs. RekhaGautam under my guidance and supervision for the partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Master of Arts in Economics. I hereby, recommend this thesis for its evaluation and approval. ______________________ Prof. Dr. KomalDhital (Thesis Supervisor) Date: 13/09/2073 B.S. 28/12/2016 A.D. 1 APPROVAL LETTER This is to certify that this thesis submitted by Mrs. RekhaGautam entitled Problems and Prospects of Tourism in Sauraha has been approved by this department in the prescribed format of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. This thesis is forwarded for the evaluation. Evaluation Committee ______________________ Prof. Dr. Ram Prasad Gyanwaly (Head of the Department) ______________________ Prof. Dr. R.K Shah (External Examiner) ______________________ Prof. Dr. KomalDhital (Thesis Supervisor) Date:03/11/2073 B.S. 14/02/2017 A.D. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research work is dedicated to my parents. It is shaped by their continuous encouragement, inspiration, sweat and toil. I am greatly indebted and grateful to my respected teachers and my thesis supervisor Professor Dr. Komal Dhital. This thesis would not have been possible without his inspiration,scholarly guidance, constructive feedback and constant encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Nights 3 Days Chitwan National Park Tour
    2 Nights 3 Days Chitwan National Park Tour 2 Nights 3 Days Chitwan National Park Tour Package Highlights Trip Facts Starting Price: US$0.00 (Per Person) Duration: 3 Days Grade: NA Destination: Nepal Meals: Breakfast + Lunch + Dinner Transportation: Private car / Tourist bus & Flight Trekking Style: Tour Accommodation: Hotel Max. Altitude: 415 miters Min. Pax: Any Best Season : March to May and October November Itinerary Details Cost Includes Chitwan National park entry fees Accommodation in twin sharing (If you want single sharing room, Single supp charge will be applied) Jungle activities as per itinerary with profesional jungle guide Arrival and departuer arrangement if you arrve by tourist bus and depart by same Full board food as per mentioned in itinerary Cost Excludes Cost of flight ticket, Bus or private car to reach Chitwan National park Bar bills, bottled drinks Personal expenses Any Tipping and Extra activities other than mentioned in itinerary and cost including Useful Note Trip Note Reaching Chitwan Private car, regular flight or Tourist bus is available from Kathmandu. If you travel by [email protected] | +977 1 4423832 © Nepal Highland Treks Pvt. Ltd. 2 Nights 3 Days Chitwan National Park Tour flight, our representative from Chitwan National park will pick up you from Bharatpur airport. It is about 22 minutes of flight. Last stop of a tourist bus in Saurahawa. From the tourist bus station, our representative will pick you up and transfer to the Hotel. Travelling by private car will reach directly to the hotel/ Resort. Best season to visit Chitwan National Park is in autumn or in spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing a Tourism Opportunity Index Regarding the Prospective of Overtourism in Nepal
    BearWorks MSU Graduate Theses Fall 2020 Developing a Tourism Opportunity Index Regarding the Prospective of Overtourism in Nepal Susan Phuyal Missouri State University, [email protected] As with any intellectual project, the content and views expressed in this thesis may be considered objectionable by some readers. However, this student-scholar’s work has been judged to have academic value by the student’s thesis committee members trained in the discipline. The content and views expressed in this thesis are those of the student-scholar and are not endorsed by Missouri State University, its Graduate College, or its employees. Follow this and additional works at: https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses Part of the Applied Statistics Commons, Atmospheric Sciences Commons, Categorical Data Analysis Commons, Climate Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Meteorology Commons, Natural Resource Economics Commons, Other Earth Sciences Commons, and the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Phuyal, Susan, "Developing a Tourism Opportunity Index Regarding the Prospective of Overtourism in Nepal" (2020). MSU Graduate Theses. 3590. https://bearworks.missouristate.edu/theses/3590 This article or document was made available through BearWorks, the institutional repository of Missouri State University. The work contained in it may be protected by copyright and require permission of the copyright holder for reuse or redistribution. For more information, please
    [Show full text]
  • Hariyo Ban Program Ii Threats and Vulnerabilities
    HARIYO BAN PROGRAM II (2016-2021) THREATS AND VULNERABILITIES ASSESSMENT OF PARKS AND CORRIDORS OF TERAI ARC LANDSCAPE Prepared by: WWF in partnership with CARE, FECOFUN and NTNC P.O. Box 7660 Kathmandu, Nepal 21 April 2017 © WWF 2017 All rights reserved Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit WWF. Published by WWF Nepal PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] , www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Disclaimer This Threats and Vulnerabilities Assessment of Parks and Corridors in Terai Arc Landscape is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................................5 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................................6 Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone ...................................................................................................................7 Threat Ratings of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone...................................................................................8 Barandabhar Corridor ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Features of Small Holder Goat Farming from Chitwan District of Bagmati
    Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science 6(2): 186-193 (2021) https://doi.org/10.26832/24566632.2021.0602010 This content is available online at AESA Archives of Agriculture and Environmental Science Journal homepage: journals.aesacademy.org/index.php/aaes e-ISSN: 2456-6632 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Features of small holder goat farming from Chitwan district of Bagmati province in Nepal Alok Dhakal1 , Sujit Regmi1, Meena Pandey1* , Teknath Chapagain1 and Krishna Kaphle2 1Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Rupandehi, Lumbini, NEPAL 2Associate Professor and Director, Veterinary Teaching Hospital, Paklihawa Campus, Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Rupandehi, Lumbini, NEPAL *Corresponding author’s E-mail: [email protected] ARTICLE HISTORY ABSTRACT Received: 01 April 2021 An assessment was done to analyze the status of small scale goat production system in Revised received: 12 May 2021 Chitwan, Nepal. A semi-structured questionnaire having both open ended and close ended Accepted: 15 June 2021 questions were interviewed to 147 farmers (69 males, 78 females). The average goat holding was 5.48±0.15 head with female: male ratio of 6: 5. Mainly women folks in the household were involved in husbandry of the raised goats. In this research, we realized that goats were a Keywords valuable commodity for the community in the survey area. Grazing in public forest, fallow Assessment lands, tree leaves, shrubs and bushes were the main sources of feed for goats throughout the Goat year. When inquired about vaccination, 92.51% of the farmers did not vaccinate their goats Husbandry and were not aware about its importance.
    [Show full text]
  • CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: a RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal
    Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Published in August 2013 by WWF Nepal Any reproduction of this publication in full or in part must mention the title and credit the above-mentioned publisher as the copyright owner. Citation: WWF Nepal 2013. Chitwan Annapurna Landscape (CHAL): A Rapid Assessment, Nepal, August 2013 Cover photo: © Neyret & Benastar / WWF-Canon Gerald S. Cubitt / WWF-Canon Simon de TREY-WHITE / WWF-UK James W. Thorsell / WWF-Canon Michel Gunther / WWF-Canon WWF Nepal, Hariyo Ban Program / Pallavi Dhakal Disclaimer This report is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Kathmandu Forestry College (KAFCOL) and do not necessarily reflect the views of WWF, USAID or the United States Government. © WWF Nepal. All rights reserved. WWF Nepal, PO Box: 7660 Baluwatar, Kathmandu, Nepal T: +977 1 4434820, F: +977 1 4438458 [email protected] www.wwfnepal.org/hariyobanprogram Hariyo Ban Program CHITWAN-ANNAPURNA LANDSCAPE: A RAPID ASSESSMENT Foreword With its diverse topographical, geographical and climatic variation, Nepal is rich in biodiversity and ecosystem services. It boasts a large diversity of flora and fauna at genetic, species and ecosystem levels. Nepal has several critical sites and wetlands including the fragile Churia ecosystem. These critical sites and biodiversity are subjected to various anthropogenic and climatic threats. Several bilateral partners and donors are working in partnership with the Government of Nepal to conserve Nepal’s rich natural heritage. USAID funded Hariyo Ban Program, implemented by a consortium of four partners with WWF Nepal leading alongside CARE Nepal, FECOFUN and NTNC, is working towards reducing the adverse impacts of climate change, threats to biodiversity and improving livelihoods of the people in Nepal.
    [Show full text]
  • C E N T R a L W E S T E
    Bhijer J u m l a Saldang N E P A L - W E S T E R N R E G I O N Patarasi Chhonhup f Zones, Districts and Village Development Committees, April 2015 Tinje Lo M anthang Kaingaon National boundary Zone boundary Village Development Comm ittee boundary Phoksundo Chhosar Region boundary District boundary Gothichour Charang Date Created: 28 Apr 2015 Contact: [email protected] Data sources: WFP, Survey Department of Nepal, SRTM Website: www.wfp.org 0 10 20 40 Rim i Prepared by: HQ, OSEP GIS The designations employed and the presentation of material in M I D - W E Dho S T E R N the map(s) do not imply the expression of any opinion on the Kilom eters part of WFP concerning the legal or constitutional status of any Map Reference: country, territory, city or sea, or concerning the delimitation of its ± frontiers or boundaries. Sarmi NPL_ADMIN_WesternRegion_A0L Pahada © World Food Programme 2015 Narku Chharka Liku Gham i Tripurakot Kalika K A R N A L I FAR-W ESTERN Lhan Raha MID-W ESTERN BJ a Hj a Er kRo It Surkhang Bhagawatitol Juphal D o l p a M u s t a n g W ESTERN Lawan Suhu Chhusang CENTRAL Gotam kot EASTERN Dunai Majhphal Mukot Kagbeni Sahartara Jhong Phu Nar Syalakhadhi Sisne Marpha Muktinath Jom som Tangkim anang Tukuche Ranm am aikot M a n a n g Baphikot Jang Pipal Pwang R u k u m Kowang Khangsar Ghyaru Mudi Pokhara M y a g d i Bhraka Sam agaun Gurja Ransi Hukam Syalpakha Kunjo Thoche W LeteE S T Manang E R N Chokhawang Kanda Narachyang Sankh Shova Chhekam par Kol Bagarchhap Pisang Kuinem angale Marwang Taksera Prok Dana Bihi Lulang Chim khola
    [Show full text]
  • LATEST and FINAL 26-06-19.Xlsx
    CATUK List of Life Members (as at 26/06/2019) LM No Surname Name Address in Nepal 1 Gaire Pandit Prem Prasad Ratopul 2 Gurung (Thakali) Bhanu Pokhara Bajar 3 Gurung Amala Surya Nagar, Chitawan 4 Ghimire Budhhi Sagar Kathmandu 5 Gurung Pro. Chandra Bahadur Pokhara 6 Gurung Deepak (David Pokhara 7 Gurung Dambar Bharatpur 8 Joshi Hiranya Man Narayanghat 9 Gurung Hit Kaji Durlung, Parbat 10 Aryal Gyanu Patihani, Chitwan 11 Gurung Jit Tangting, Kaski 12 Gurung Lal Bahadur Durlung, Parbat 13 Gurung Kamal ChhetraPur, Chitawan 14 Sapkota Kamalapati Bharatpur, Chitwan 15 Gurung Kamal Bharatpur, Chitwan 16 Gurung Muchhetra Pokhara 17 Gurung Min Prasad Pokhara 18 Gurung Nanda Prasad Gitanagar, Chitawan 19 Kandel Narayan Prasad Gaidakot 20 Pandey Parsuram Gitanagar 21 Gurung Purna Parbatinagar 22 Gurung Prem Saradanagar 23 Gurung Ram Chandra (Surje) Pokhara 24 Subedi Bhagawati Koirala Bharatpur 25 Gurung Surya Pokhara 26 Lamichhane Shanta Binod Bharatpur 27 Gurung Shankar Shiva Nagar 28 Gaire Ravi Lal Japan Birendra Nagar , 29 Sapkota Khem NarayanGhat,Chitawan 30 Shrestha Kapil Chitawan 31 Bhattarai Hari YagyaPuri 1 of 5 32 Poudel Kamal Bharatpur 33 Gurung Lok Gunja Nagar 34 Ghale Shiva Kumar Surya Nagar 35 Gurung Himal Bharatpur 36 Sharma Subas Subas Sharma 37 Gurung Hima Rampur 38 Shreshtha Basanta Rampur 39 Subedi Tank Kawasati 40 Adhikari Prakash Bharatpur 41 Dhakal Shankar Bharatpur 42 Shreshtha Devendra Gita Nagar 43 Gurung Krishna Bharatpur 44 Gurung Abhisek Rampur 45 Sapkota Bhim Rampur 46 Shreshtha Madan Kumar Gita Nagar 47 Gurung Krishna
    [Show full text]
  • Global Initiative on Out-Of-School Children
    ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Government of Nepal Ministry of Education, Singh Darbar Kathmandu, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 4200381 www.moe.gov.np United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Institute for Statistics P.O. Box 6128, Succursale Centre-Ville Montreal Quebec H3C 3J7 Canada Telephone: +1 514 343 6880 Email: [email protected] www.uis.unesco.org United Nations Children´s Fund Nepal Country Office United Nations House Harihar Bhawan, Pulchowk Lalitpur, Nepal Telephone: +977 1 5523200 www.unicef.org.np All rights reserved © United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) 2016 Cover photo: © UNICEF Nepal/2016/ NShrestha Suggested citation: Ministry of Education, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), Global Initiative on Out of School Children – Nepal Country Study, July 2016, UNICEF, Kathmandu, Nepal, 2016. ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL Global Initiative on Out-of-School Children © UNICEF Nepal/2016/NShrestha NEPAL COUNTRY STUDY JULY 2016 Tel.: Government of Nepal MINISTRY OF EDUCATION Singha Durbar Ref. No.: Kathmandu, Nepal Foreword Nepal has made significant progress in achieving good results in school enrolment by having more children in school over the past decade, in spite of the unstable situation in the country. However, there are still many challenges related to equity when the net enrolment data are disaggregated at the district and school level, which are crucial and cannot be generalized. As per Flash Monitoring Report 2014- 15, the net enrolment rate for girls is high in primary school at 93.6%, it is 59.5% in lower secondary school, 42.5% in secondary school and only 8.1% in higher secondary school, which show that fewer girls complete the full cycle of education.
    [Show full text]