DOCSLIB.ORG

0, 595.1922.Vii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0, 595.1922.Vii 0, 595.1922.VII. Translation. LEAGUE 0? NATIONS. Geneva, August 28th,1922. Austro-Hungarian Frontier Question. Report by M. Hymans. Articles 27 of the Treaties of St. Germain and Trianon indicate a certain number of points through which the frontier line to be drawn between A ustria and Hungary is to pass. The Venice Protocol of October 13th, 1921 provided for a plebiscite in the district of the tom of SOPRON (Oedenburg). As a result of this plebiscite the town and neighbourhood were defin­ itely incorporated into Hungary. With regard to the remainder of the frontier between Austria (Burgenland) and Hungary, a Delimitation Commission ap­ pointed by the Conference of Ambassadors and consisting of British, French, Italian and Japanese representatives, together with Austrian and Hungarian Commissioners, made a study on the ground, and, after considering the proposals of the two States concerned, decided to submit to the Council of the league of Nations three Reports relating to certain proposed modifica­ tions (documents circulated to the Council: C.410,419,420). The portions of these Reports giving the proposed modifications, with the Commission's reasons for reoommending them, are repro­ duced later in this document. It need only be mentioned here that they relate to three districts: those of PAMHAGEN, LIEBING and the PINKA VALLEY, which it is proposed to include within the Hungarian f r o n tie r . Note: An explanatory map is annexed to this memorandum (Annex 6). The regions affected by the decisions of the Commission are coloured red, but the boundaries marked must not be taken as definite. The reports actually propose to change certain points mentioned in the Treaty, without precisely defining the detail of the frontier. 2 — The legal foundation of the Council's action is indicated iatlie S ecreta ry -G e n e ral' s memorandum, C.423, dated June 29th 1922, which has "been circulated to the Members of the Council. its meeting on July 19th, the Council agreed to give a decision on the proposals of the Delimitation Commission, and the two Governments have agreed to accept its decision- In signing the Venice Protocol and agreeing to a plebiscite at Oedenburg. Austria male a sacrifice, the general object of which was to defer to the wishes of the Powers and help to restore good neighbourly relations with Hungary, but at the same time to retain intact the remainder of the territory assigned to her by the Peace Treaty, Austria has freely accepted in advance the decision of the Council of the Lea m s of Nations as to the re­ mainder of the Burgenland frontier; she has confidence in the Council's impartiality and is convinced that it will recognise the spirit of conciliation of which ehe has already given proof, to the advantage of Hungary, seeing that the latter is now in pos­ session of the Oedencurg territory* In other cases, modifications in the frontiers fixed by the Treaty, according to the procedure laid down in the covering l e t t e r of May 1920, can be ju s tif ie d ; but in th is case due wiight should be given to the Iwavy sacrifice to which ■Austria lias already agreed, thereby showing a singular spirit of conciliation, particularly as the dangerous situation which tos relieved by this sacrifice had been created by the threatening attitude of Hungary, who refused to submit to the pro­ visions of the Treaty, Austria did not ask the Delimitation Commission for any modification of the demarcation in her favour, although the matter leaves in Hungarian territory a considerable number of communes which are German by speech and Austrian by sentiment, for gho wished above all that the provisions of the Treaty should be m aintained and respected» The Peace Conference, in assigning the Burgenland to Austria, wishud not only to grpup populations of the same origin together, hut also to give to Austria an agricultural region which might help to supply Vienna. The value of the Burgenland has already "been conniderably reduced by the loss of its capital, Oederiburg, which is also the centre of its system of communications» The removal of this town not only diminishes the economic yield of the Burgenland, but renders its government more difficult. The proposed modifications would multiply these difficulties bj: cutting the vital communications of the region at three points, particularly at Lookenhaus, (Leka). The Treaty has alread 3r b'on put into force in this region, and the Austrian administration has been working since the beginning of 1922» The population voted at the elections for the Austrian National Assembly and the local Diet, and the members sen t to vote have made no p r o te s t. I t has q u ie tly resumed its work, which is of great value to Austria, These are new and very forcible arguments against the proposed changes. By the transfer to Hungary of the districts covered by the Commission’s Reports, the population would incur more serious losses than those which the Commission has s fought to remedy in accordance with the spirit of its instructions* Certain places, both in the Burgenland ûnd in Hungary, might perhaps profit by these frontier ohangae, but at the expense of the Burgenland as a whole. 4 - The serious consequences of such alterations would affect the Austrian State itself. The Federal Government wished Ur gently t6 ditew the attention of the Council to the political and economic effects of a decision which would add onj more difficulty to the problem cf the reconstruction of Austria. It considers that no further stress need "be laid upon this aspect of the question, the gravity of which the Council understands. The Austrian Government, which has never ceased to show its respect for the frontier fixed by th Treaty, ventures to hope that the Council will refuse its approval to any further modifications of that frontier, which would compromise the vital interests of Austria and of her unfortunate people. The considerations ur^ed by the Hun arian Dele rate in favour of the Report of the Delimitation Commission .ill b~ found later in this report, but in reply to the general considerations submitted by the Austrian Government the Hungarian Representative wishes to make the following statement: - 5 - By the Treaty of Trianon Hungary lost two-thirds of her former population and three-quarters of her territory. In signing this Treaty, the most crushing treaty of modern times, the Government was convinced that the solemn promises contained in the Covering Letter cf May 6th, 1980 - signed by M. Miller and and addressed to the Hungarian Delegation with a view to rendering the signature of the Treaty less onerous - would he kept in fu ll0 Unhappily, these hopes* which the Hungarian Government and people were justified in entertaining, were disappointed. The provisions of the Covering Letter were not respected by the Delimitation Commissions, which rejected all, even the best-founded Hungarian claimst It was only in the Austro-Hungarian and 3erho-Hungarian frontiers that the Commissions thought fit to make slight modi­ fications in the lines fixed by the Treaties, modifications ¥/hich were based on economic reasons which it was impossible to question. If the Council of the League of Hâtions refuses its appro­ val to these p ro p o sa ls, which rep resen t ihe minimum of the Hun­ garian claims, the Hungarian Government will be faced by a most serious situation, inasmuch as the National Assembly and public opinion fully cxpect that the territories a signed to us by the Commission w ill be re sto re d to Hungary» The political situation which would be created in Austria by the adopting of the conclusions of the Delimitation Commission could not be so giave, in view of the fact that public opinion in the neighbouring Republic is completely absorbed in the economic and f in a n c ia l c r i s i s and in the p o l i t i c a l problem of union with Germany, and shows very little serious interest in -6- the question of the boundaries of a newly-acquired province. Moreover, the Austrian Government has had to reckon with the possibility of losing territory in the Burgenland, considering that the Venico Protocol does not refer solely to the plebis­ cite, but, also, quite explicitly, to the question of de­ limitation between the tv/o neighbouring States. In assuming, by this Protocol, the obligation of submitting to the décisions of the Delimitation Commission or of the Council of the League of Nations, Austria has admitted that modifications in the frontier may be decreed; it also appears, from the unilateral character of this obligation that only frontier rectifications in favour of Hungary were contemplated at Venice; for, if the pos ibility of modifications in favour of Austria had beon considered, a similar obligation should logically have been innosed upon Hungary. Finally, it mv.st be pointed out that the agricultural pro­ duce of the districts which should be restored to Hungary is insufficient tor the needs of their own inhabitants, so that transfer of these districts could in no way affect the Austrian food supply. - 7- 11a Proposals of the DeIf m ltatio n Commission. The Commission pro os os three rectifications (see C 418, C 419, 0 480.} A, PAM HAG BN -, The Commission desires to be relieved of the obligation of allocating to Austria the village of pamhagen (mentioned by name in Article 87 of the Treaty of Trianon ), Reasons. In order to lessen the difficult!es due to the inevitable partition of the flood area of the RAÀ33 and of the organisation of the hydraulic system in that region» RESULTS OF1 THE COMLIISCION1 S 3NQUIRY, It, The ontire region described as tho "flood area of the Raab" is covered by an immense hydraulic system intended : to protect the cultivated lands against floods : to drain off the standing waters in the district to the east of the southern part of Lake Neusiedl; and on the other hand to irrigate the -oeaty lands of the Han sag vhen they are completely dried up in mid-summer; and to continue the draining of Lake Neusiedl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • BURGENLAND Than Samplinglocal and Youhave Region
    © Lonely Planet Publications 188 Burgenland Often given a wide berth by tourists, Burgenland is all but the typical Austria you hear of or read about. It has neither bombastic architecture nor deep lakes and soaring mountains. On the contrary, it is small and sleepy, and in large sections a flat province situated on the border with Hungary. Even the jewel in its crown – Neusiedler See – has dried up and disappeared several times in its natural history – most recently in the mid-19th century. This is the kind of place where everyday life takes precedence, but it is precisely this ‘every- day’ aspect that makes it interesting. The province receives a reputed 300 days of sunshine a year; couple this with a rich soil base and a wine history dating back to pre-Roman times, and you have Austria’s best wine-producing region. What better way to spend an afternoon than sampling local Weine (wines) in a Heuriger (wine tavern) under a warm sun? Throw in the shallow Neusiedler See and a section of it that is now the Neusiedler See-Seewinkel National Park, tack on a bike path that leads into the park and through Hungary before re- emerging in Austria, and add a swampy, medieval town such as Rust, and you might find yourself fascinated by Burgenland’s charms. Stork-spotters will be in their element here in summer, when feathered friends populate the roofs of several towns near the lake – including Rust, one of the nicest places to observe BURGENLAND BURGENLAND them. Although it does have a handful of interesting cultural sights, such as Schloss Ester- házy in Eisenstadt, the province’s small capital, Burgenland is more a place where people are content to enjoy good wine and food, and relax in the great outdoors.
    [Show full text]
  • Und Abwasserverband – Lockenhaus Und Umgebung –
    WASSER- UND ABWASSERVERBAND – LOCKENHAUS UND UMGEBUNG – WASSER- UND ABWASSERVERBAND – LOCKENHAUS UND UMGEBUNG – WASSER- UND ABWASSERVERBAND LOCKENHAUS UND UMGEBUNG Vorwort Landeshauptmann Hans Peter Doskozil er 1959 aus der Pla- Gemeinden unter Nutzung der re- nung einer Ringwas- gionalen Ressourcen sein. Nur ein serleitung hervor- gesundes Wachstum kann das Bur- gegangene Wasser- genland voranbringen. Der Wasser- Dund Abwasserverband und Abwasserverband trägt ent- Lockenhaus und Umgebung hat sich scheidend zur hohen Lebensqualität in den vergangenen Jahrzehnten der Menschen bei und hat auch für als verlässlicher Partner in der eine erfolgreiche wirtschaftliche Wasserversorgung und der Aufberei- und touristische Entwicklung der tung von Abwasser etabliert. Mit Region eine wichtige Funktion. der Errichtung seiner vollbiologi- schen Zentralkläranlage in Klos- Ich danke dem Wasser- und Abwas- termarienberg 1976 nahm der Ver- serverband Lockenhaus für seine band bereits damals eine Vorrei- Leistung für die Region, gratuliere terrolle in Sachen Nachhaltigkeit herzlich zum 60-jährigen Bestands- ein – und dient in Zeiten, in denen jubiläum und wünsche alles Gute wir uns ernsthafte Gedanken um für die Zukunft! Klimaschutz machen müssen, als leuchtendes Beispiel. Der Wasser- und Abwasserverband Lockenhaus und Umgebung hat we- sentlich dazu beigetragen, das wirt- schaftliche Wachstum der Region mit einer intakten Natur in Einklang zu bringen. Das ist der Weg, den auch das Burgenland gehen will: Das Ziel muss eine nachhaltige Hans Peter Doskozil Entwicklung des Landes und der Landeshauptmann des Burgenlandes 4 WASSER- UND ABWASSERVERBAND LOCKENHAUS UND UMGEBUNG Vorwort Landesrat Heinrich Dorner auberes Wasser – wie gestellt, dass das Trinkwasser für wir es im Burgenland die Menschen in der Region den haben - ist in vielen strengen Qualitätsrichtlinien ent- Teilen Europas und der spricht und leistbar ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemeindesanitätskreisvo Anlage
    Anlage Verwaltungsbezirk Gemeindeverband Berufssitz der Sitz des (Sanitätskreis) Kreisärzte Gemeindeverbandes EISENSTADT - 1. Donnerskirchen Donnerskirchen Donnerskirchen UMGEBUNG Schützen am Gebirge 2. Hornstein Hornstein Hornstein Wimpassing an der Leitha 3. Purbach Purbach Purbach am Neusiedler See am Neusiedler See am Neusiedler See Breitenbrunn 4. Siegendorf Siegendorf Siegendorf Klingenbach 5. Steinbrunn Steinbrunn Steinbrunn Müllendorf Zillingtal 6. Wulkaprodersdorf Wulkaprodersdorf Wulkaprodersdorf Zagersdorf GÜSSING 1. Strem Strem Strem Heiligenbrunn 2. Großmürbisch Güssing Güssing Inzenhof Kleinmürbisch Neustift bei Güssing Tobaj Tschanigraben 3. Güttenbach Güttenbach Güttenbach Neuberg im Burgenland 4. Kukmirn Kukmirn Kukmirn Gerersdorf-Sulz 5. Sankt Michael Sankt Michael Sankt Michael im Burgenland im Burgenland im Burgenland Rauchwart 6. Stinatz Stinatz Stinatz Hackerberg Ollersdorf im Burgenland Wörterberg JENNERSDORF 1. Eltendorf Eltendorf Eltendorf Königsdorf 2. Minihof -Liebau Minihof -Liebau Minhof -Liebau Sankt Martin an der Raab 3. Mogersdorf Mogersdorf Mogersdorf Weichselbaum 4. Neuhaus Neuhaus Neuhaus am Klausenbach am Klausenbach am Klausenbach Mühlgraben MATTERSBURG 1. Antau Antau Antau Hirm Pöttelsdorf Zemendorf-Stöttera 2. Draßburg Draßburg Draßburg Baumgarten 3. Pöttsching Pöttsching Pöttsching Krensdorf Sigleß 4. Schattendorf Schattendorf Schattendorf Loipersbach im Burgenland NEUSIEDL 1. Kittsee Kittsee Kittsee AM SEE Edelstal 2. Pama Pama Pama Deutsch Jahrndorf 3. Gattendorf Gattendorf Gattendorf Zurndorf
    [Show full text]
  • 2Nd Report by the Republic of Austria
    Strasbourg, 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 [English only] SECOND REPORT SUBMITTED BY AUSTRIA PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 25, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES Received on 1 December 2006 ACFC/SR/II(2006)008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I...................................................................................................................................5 I.1. General Remarks..............................................................................................................5 I.2. Comments on the Questions and the Resolution of the Council of Europe ........................7 PART II ...............................................................................................................................17 II.1. The Situation of the National Minorities in Austria .......................................................17 II.1.1. The History of the National Minorities .......................................................................18 The Croat minority in Burgenland ........................................................................................18 The Slovene minority ...........................................................................................................19 The Hungarian minority .......................................................................................................21 The Czech minority..............................................................................................................21 The Slovak minority.............................................................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Radbasisnetz Region Oberwart
    RADBASISNETZ REGION OBERWART erstellt für: Regionalmanagement Burgenland GmbH Marktstraße 3, 7000 Eisenstadt [email protected] erstellt von: Verracon GmbH Eschenbachstraße 11 · A-1010 Wien [email protected] · www.verracon.at Stand: 08.01.2020 Inhaltsverzeichnis 2 INHALT 1 MEHR ALS GUTE GRÜNDE FÜRS RADFAHREN ................................................................................. 3 2 WORUM GEHT’S BEIM RADBASISNETZ ........................................................................................... 6 2.1 Die Radbasisnetze im Burgenland .......................................................................................... 6 2.2 Alltagsradverkehr vs. Freizeitradverkehr ............................................................................... 8 2.3 Woraus kann ein Radverkehrsnetz bestehen? ..................................................................... 10 3 DER WEG ZUM RADBASISNETZ ..................................................................................................... 12 3.1 Ein gemeinsamer Prozess .................................................................................................... 12 3.2 Ziele und Wunschlinien ........................................................................................................ 13 3.2.1 Ziele der Pendlerinnen und Pendler ......................................................................... 13 3.2.2 Wichtige regionale Ziele ........................................................................................... 14 3.2.3 Wunschliniennetz
    [Show full text]
  • Arisierungsakten Des Nördlichen Burgenlandes (Landeshauptmannschaft Niederösterreich)
    Arisierungsakten des nördlichen Burgenlandes (Landeshauptmannschaft Niederösterreich) Faszikel 1 16 Orley Olga Bruck a. d. Leitha F 1 34 Feigelstock Hugo u. Jolan Deutschkreutz F 1 34 a Feigelstock Gustav, Hugo u. Jolan Deutschkreutz F 1 37 Nemeth Maria Eisenstadt F 1 117 Mayer Karl Bruckneudorf F 1 Fould Anna; Lederer Valarie; Stutzer 202 Deutschkreutz F 1 Charlotte; Weiler Sigmund u. Stefanie Aufzeichnungen über die zum Abbruch 214 Deutschkreutz F 1 bestimmten Judenhäuser 218 Reiner Netti Sara Deutschkreutz F 1 238 Mandel Ernst Israel Sauerbrunn F 1 246 Eisenberg Isidor Deutschkreutz F 1 248 Entenberg Sigmund Neudörfl F 1 249 Engel Leopold Frauenkirchen F 1 250 Steindler Julius Eisenstadt F 1 252 Gerstl Josefine Sara Frauenkirchen F 1 253 Goldner Sigmund, Gisela, Erich u. Rosa Deutschkreutz F 1 255 Grünwald Gabriel u. Giza Deutschkreutz F 1 257 Gerö Oskar Eisenstadt F 1 268 Hirschenhäuser Eugenie Mattersburg F 1 269 Hirsch Alfred Mattersburg F 1 272 Krauß Berta Deutschkreutz F 1 275 a Judenmöbel Oberpullendorf F 1 275 b Judenmöbel Frauenkirchen F 1 275 c Judenmöbel Sauerbrunn F 1 342 Hacker Isidor u. Maria Kobersdorf F 1 342 a Hacker Isidor u. Maria Kobersdorf F 1 342 c Hacker Maria Lindgraben F 1 Faszikel 2 417 Weiss Pratin Bruckneudorf F 2 433 Bruckner & Spiegel; Spiegel Emanuel Deutschkreutz F 2 439 Boskovits Hugo; Mayer Josef Nickelsdorf F 2 439 Boskovits Hugo Nickelsdorf F 2 445 Unger Karl Eisenstadt F 2 473 Rom Michael, Gustav u. Elisabeth Purbach F 2 489 Zinszahlungen an Hr. Fetter Frauenkirchen F 2 517 Hacker Ignatz Lackenbach F 2 517 a Hacker Ignatz Lackenbach F 2 517 b Hacker Ignatz Lackenbach F 2 523 Riegler Regina Kobersdorf F 2 527 Siegar Julius, Margarethe, Stefan u.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobilitäts-Check Lockenhaus
    Mobilitäts-Check Lockenhaus Mobilitäts-Check Lockenhaus Marktgemeinde Lockenhaus Hauptplatz 10 7442 Lockenhaus Erstellt durch MiRo Mobility GmbH Technologiezentrum Eisenstadt Marktstraße 3, Bauteil 6, 2. OG 7000 Eisenstadt Eisenstadt, Mai 2018 1 Einleitung ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2 Status Quo ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Lage und Bevölkerung ............................................................................................................. 5 2.1.1 Lage im Raum .................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Bevölkerungsstatistik....................................................................................................... 6 2.1.3 Pendlerstatistik ................................................................................................................ 6 2.2 Bestehendes Angebot in der Gemeinde ................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Nahversorgung und soziale Infrastruktur ........................................................................ 7 2.2.2 Besonderheiten ............................................................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Verkehrserschließung .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Burgenland 2010.Indd
    M i l i t ä r k o m m a n d o B u r g e n l a n d Ergänzungsabteilung: 7000 EISENSTADT, Martin-Kaserne, Ing. Hans-Sylvesterstraße 5 Parteienverkehr: Montag bis Freitag von 0900 bis 1400 Uhr Telefon: 050201 / 15-41022 STELLUNGSKUNDMACHUNG 2010 Auf Grund des § 18 Abs. 1 des Wehrgesetzes 2001, BGBl. I Nr. 85/2009, haben sich alle österreichischen Staatsbürger männlichen Geschlechtes des G E B U R T S J A H R G A N G E S 1 9 9 2 sowie alle älteren wehrpflichtigen Jahrgänge, die bisher der Stellungspflicht noch nicht nachgekommen sind, gemäß dem unten angeführten Plan der Stellung zu unter- ziehen. Österreichische Staatsbürger des Geburtsjahrganges 1992 oder eines älteren Geburtsjahrganges, bei denen die Stellungspflicht erst nach dem in dieser Stellungs- kundmachung festgelegten Stellungstag entsteht, haben am 09.12.2010 zur Stellung zu erscheinen, sofern sie nicht vorher vom Militärkommando persönlich geladen wurden. Für Stellungspflichtige, welche ihren Hauptwohnsitz nicht in Österreich haben, gilt diese Stellungskundmachung nicht. Sie werden gegebenenfalls gesondert zur Stellung aufgefordert. Für die Stellung ist insbesondere Folgendes zu beachten: 1. Für den Bereich des Militärkommandos BURGENLAND werden die Stellungspflichtigen durch die Stellungs- 4. Wehrpflichtige, die das 17. Lebensjahr vollendet haben, können sich bei der Ergänzungsabteilung des Militärkom- kommission des Militärkommandos WIEN oder des Militärkommandos STEIERMARK der Stellung zugeführt. Das mandos BURGENLAND freiwillig zur vorzeitigen Stellung melden. Sofern militärische Interessen nicht entgegen- Stellungsverfahren, bei welchem durch den Einsatz moderner medizinischer Geräte und durch psychologische stehen, wird solchen Anträgen entsprochen. Tests die körperliche und geistige Eignung zum Wehrdienst genau festgestellt wird, nimmt in der Regel 1 1/2 Tage 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Bevölkerungsbeteiligung
    Bevölkerungsbeteiligung Vorstand Obmann: BM Mag. Norbert DARABOS Obmann Stv.: LAbg. Bgm. Wilhelm HEIßENBERGER Schriftführer: Bgm. Ing. Paul PINIEL, Weppersdorf Kassier: Paul MAYERHOFER, Neckenmarkt Weitere Vorstandsmitglieder: LAbg. Bgm. Werner BRENNER Gemeinde Lockenhaus Elisabeth DORN, Oberpullendorf Frauen, Soziales Josef FUCHS, Hochstraß Landwirtschaft Dir. Gerhard GLÖCKL, Neutal Bildung Bgm. Franz HOSCHOPF Gemeinde Weingraben Ing. Anton IBY, Horitschon Landwirtschaft, Wein Herbert ROSENITSCH, Glashütten, Wirtschaft Bgm. Stefan ROZSENICH Gemeinde Großwarasdorf Dir. Mag. Helene SCHÜTZ-FATALIN, Bubend. Jugend Franz STIFTER, Steinberg-Dörfl Tourismus Strategieteam LAbg. Bgm. Werner BRENNER, Vorstand Elisabeth DORN, Vorstand Dir. Gerhard GLÖCKL, Vorstand LAbg. Bgm. Wilhelm HEIßENBERGER, Vorstand Ing. Anton IBY, Vorstand Paul MAYERHOFER, Vorstand Franz STIFTER, Vorstand WHR Mag. Georg SCHACHINGER, RMB Heidi DRUCKER, GFin und LAG Managerin Mitglieder Gemeinde Deutschkreutz Gemeinde Neutal Gemeinde Draßmarkt Gemeinde Niktisch Gemeinde Frankenau -Unterpullendorf Gemeinde Oberloisdorf Gemeinde Großwarasdorf Gemeinde Oberpullendorf Gemeinde Horitschon Gemeinde Pilgersdorf Gemeinde Kaisersdorf Gemeinde Piringsdorf Gemeinde Kobersdorf Gemeinde Rainding Gemeinde Lackenbach Gemeinde Ritzing Gemeinde Lackend orf Gemeinde Steinberg-Dörfl Gemeinde Lockenhaus Gemeinde Stoob Gemeinde Lutzmannsburg Gemeinde Unterfrauenhaid Gemeinde Mannersdorf a. d. Rabnitz Gemeinde Unterrabnitz-Schwendgraben Gemeinde Markt St. Martin Gemeinde Weingraben Gemeinde Neckenmarkt
    [Show full text]
  • Eignungskarten Für Tiefsonden Im Burgenland, 2016
    Eignungskarten für Tiefsonden im Burgenland, 2016 Edelstal Kittsee Pama Potzneusiedl Bruckneudorf Parndorf Neudorf bei Parndorf Gattendorf Deutsch Jahrndorf Kaisersteinbruch Zurndorf Winden Jois Neusiedl am See Breitenbrunn Nickelsdorf Leithaprodersdorf Weiden am See Purbach am Neusiedlersee Wimpassing an der Leitha Loretto Gols Mönchhof Stotzing Donnerskirchen Hornstein Schützen am Gebirge Neufeld an der Leitha Halbturn St. Georgen Oggau Steinbrunn Oberberg-Eisenstadt Müllendorf Eisenstadt Podersdorf am See Kleinhöflein im Burgenland Oslip Frauenkirchen Großhöflein Trausdorf an der Wulka Zillingtal Rust Neudörfl Wulkaprodersdorf Hirm St. Margarethen Pöttsching St. Andrä Krensdorf Antau Sauerbrunn Stöttera Siegendorf Andau Sigleß Illmitz Pöttsching-Rosalia Zemendorf Zagersdorf Mörbisch am See Klingenbach Pöttelsdorf Tadten Draßburg Wiesen Walbersdorf Apetlon Baumgarten Wallern im Burgenland Mattersburg Loipersbach-Kogel Schattendorf Pamhagen Forchtenau Neustift an der Rosalia Marz Loipersbach Rohrbach bei Mattersburg Sieggraben Lackenbach Kalkgruben Ritzing Oberpetersdorf Neckenmarkt Tschurndorf Girm Kobersdorf Lackendorf Haschendorf Deutschkreutz Unterpetersdorf Weppersdorf Horitschon Neudorf bei Landsee Lindgraben Unterfrauenhaid Landsee Raiding St. Martin Neutal Kleinwarasdorf Nikitsch Kaisersdorf Großwarasdorf Weingraben Stoob Kroatisch Minihof Nebersdorf Draßmarkt Oberpullendorf Karl Kroatisch Geresdorf Oberrabnitz Dörfl Mitterpullendorf Kleinmutschen Steinbach Unterpullendorf Lutzmannsburg Schwendgraben Lebenbrunn Steinberg Großmutschen
    [Show full text]
  • Fahrplan Ab 25.09.2017
    97 7990 Eisenstadt - Oberpullendorf - Oberwart - Jennersdorf www.suedburg.at Südburg Kraftwagen-Betriebs-GesmbH & Co KG, Steinamangerer Straße 142, 7400 Oberwart, Tel. 03352/38974 gültig ab: 25. September 2017 9701 8407 9703 9705 9707 9709 KURSNUMMER 9702 9704 9706 9708 8422 1 1 A A 8 9 Nr Km VERKEHRSBESCHRÄNKUNG A U A U 8 M 1 4 F10 13 05 16 05 1 0 ab Eisenstadt Technologiezentrum an 7 15 9 00 F10 13 10 16 10 2 0 ab Eisenstadt Hutweide an 7 20 9 05 13 25 16 25 18 10 18 15 3 0 ab Eisenstadt Domplatz an P 7 25 9 10 17 25 I I I I 4 0 ab Eistenstadt Bahnhof an 7 27 II 13 28 16 28 18 13 18 18 5 0 Eisenstadt Rotes Kreuz I I 17 23 13 29 16 29 18 14 18 19 6 0 Eisenstadt Merkur I I 17 22 I I 18 25 18 30 8 17 Mattersburg Martinsplatz I I I I I 18 35 18 40 11 29 Sieggraben III I I 18 38 18 43 12 33 Kalkgruben Mitte III I 18 40 18 45 14 35 Tschurndorf Mitte I I I 13 55 17 00 18 45 18 50 16 39 Weppersdorf Bäckerei Gradwohl I 8 44 16 58 13 58 17 03 18 48 18 53 17 42 Markt St Martin Gh Muschitz 6 41 8 41 16 55 14 00 17 05 18 50 18 55 20 44 Neutal Gemeindeamt 6 39 8 39 16 53 14 02 17 08 18 53 18 58 22 47 Stoob Gemeindeamt 6 36 8 36 16 50 6 00 6 30 14 05 17 10 18 58 19 03 26 51 Oberpullendorf Spitalstr 6 30 8 30 16 45 19 15 6 00 6 30 14 05 17 11 18 58 19 03 27 51 Oberpullendorf Kirche I I I IIIIII 28 51 Oberpullendorf Augasse/Bücherei 6 30 8 30 16 45 19 15 IIIIII 29 51 Oberpullendorf Augasse 41/26 6 30 8 30 16 44 19 14 IIIIII 30 51 Oberpullendorf Großfeldsdlg .Eisenst.Str.
    [Show full text]
  • 7941 Oberpullendorf - Klostermarienberg - Langental Betreiber: Blaguss Reisen Gmbh Richard-Strauss-Straße 32, 1230 Wien Tel: 050655-1333
    Wien - Mattersburg - Forchtenstein - 7941 Oberpullendorf - Klostermarienberg - Langental Betreiber: Blaguss Reisen GmbH Richard-Strauss-Straße 32, 1230 Wien Tel: 050655-1333. Alle Angaben ohne Gewähr Montag - Freitag (Werktag) Kursnummer 4 8 12 14 52 54 60 60 56 62 68 70 74 74 114 76 78 80 82 Verkehrshinweis 32 31ha 31ho 32 32CG 32 31 32 31 1 Wien Hauptbahnhof (L1) 9.10 12.15 12.15 12.15 12.45 13.15 13.25 13.45 14.45 15.00 15.40 16.00 16.15 2 - Matzleinsdorfer Platz 9.15 12.20 12.20 12.20 12.50 13.20 13.32 13.50 14.50 15.05 15.45 16.05 16.20 3 - Spinnerin am Kreuz 9.18 12.23 12.23 12.23 12.53 13.23 13.34 13.53 14.53 15.08 15.48 16.08 16.23 4 - Triester Str./Computerstr. 9.20 12.25 12.25 12.25 12.55 13.25 13.35 13.55 14.55 15.10 15.50 16.10 16.25 16 Wiener Neustadt IZ/Fa. Triumph 9.50 12.56 12.56 12.56 13.55 15.55 15.55 20 - Ungargasse/Corvinusring 10.05 11.10 12.10 13.10 13.10 13.10 14.10 16.05 16.05 16.30 24 Neudörfl Abzw. Pöttsching 10.09 11.14 12.14 13.14 13.14 13.14 14.14 14.15 16.09 16.09 16.34 16.49 29 Bad Sauerbrunn Abzw.Pöttsching 10.15 11.20 13.20 13.20 13.20 14.20 14.21 16.15 16.15 16.40 16.55 31 - Römersee 10.17 11.22 13.22 13.22 13.22 14.22 14.23 16.17 16.17 16.42 16.57 32 Wiesen-Sigleß Bahnhof 10.20 13.25 13.25 13.25 14.25 14.25 16.20 16.20 16.45 17.00 36 Pöttsching Rathaus/Hauptstraße 12.21 38 Sigleß Ortsmitte 11.28 40 Krensdorf Gemeindeamt 11.32 12.27 41 Kleinfrauenhaid Friedhof 11.35 12.30 43 Hirm Hauptplatz/Kirche 11.38 12.33 44 Antau Kleine Zeile 11.43 12.38 46 Stöttera Feuerwehr 11.46 12.41 48 Zemendorf Wr.-Neustädter-Str.
    [Show full text]