DOCSLIB.ORG

Scoping Documents for 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scoping Documents for 2018 HORIZON2020 Programme Contract No. 733032 HBM4EU Scoping documents for 2018 Deliverable Report D 4.2 WP 4 Prioritisation and input to the Annual Work Plan Deadline: June, 2017 Upload by Coordinator: 28.06.2017 Entity Name of person responsible Short name of Received institution date Coordinator Marike Kolossa-Gehring UBA 27.06.2017 Grant Signatory Greet Schoeters VITO 23.06.2017 Pillar Leader Greet Schoeters VITO 23.06.2017 Work Package Catherine Ganzleben EEA 23.06.2017 Leader Task leader Greet Schoeters VITO 23.06.2017 Responsible author Greet Schoeters E-mail [email protected] Short name of Phone +32 14 33 5167 VITO institution Co-authors Carolin Tschersich (UBA), Robert Barouki (INSERM), Maria Uhl (EAA), Jana Klánová (MU), Milena Horvat (JSI), Alessandro Alimonti (ISS), Denis Sarigiannis (AUTH), Tiina Santonen (FIOH), Erik Lebret (RIVM) D 4.2 Scoping Documents for 2018 Security: Public WP 4 - Prioritisation and input to the Annual Work Plan Version: 3 Authors: Carolin Tschersich, Robert Barouki, Maria Uhl, Jana Klánová, Milena Horvat, Page: 2 Alessandro Alimonti, Denis Sarigiannis, Tiina Santonen, Erik Lebret, Greet Schoeters Table of contents Table of contents ............................................................................................................................ 2 1. Authors and Acknowledgements .............................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 6 3. Prioritised substance group: Phthalates & DINCH.................................................................... 7 3.1. Background information .................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1. Hazardous properties................................................................................................. 7 3.1.2. Exposure characteristics ............................................................................................ 7 3.1.3. Technical aspects ...................................................................................................... 8 3.1.4. Policy relevance......................................................................................................... 8 3.2. Categorisation of substances ............................................................................................ 8 3.2.1. Additional information by ECHA: ................................................................................ 9 3.3. Objectives / Policy related questions ................................................................................. 9 3.3.1. Additional Comments: .............................................................................................. 13 3.4. References ..................................................................................................................... 14 4. Prioritised substance group: Bisphenols ................................................................................ 18 4.1. Background Information .................................................................................................. 18 4.1.1. Hazardous properties............................................................................................... 18 4.1.2. Exposure characteristics .......................................................................................... 18 4.1.3. Policy relevance....................................................................................................... 19 4.1.4. Technical aspects .................................................................................................... 20 4.1.5. Societal concern ...................................................................................................... 20 4.2. Categorisation of Substances ......................................................................................... 21 4.3. Objectives / Policy-related questions .............................................................................. 24 4.4. Research activities to be undertaken .............................................................................. 25 4.5. References ..................................................................................................................... 28 5. Prioritised substance group: Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) ............................ 32 5.1. Background Information .................................................................................................. 32 5.1.1. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 32 5.1.2. Hazardous properties:.............................................................................................. 32 5.1.3. Policy relevance....................................................................................................... 33 5.1.4. Exposure characteristics .......................................................................................... 34 5.1.5. Technical aspects .................................................................................................... 37 5.1.6. Societal concern ...................................................................................................... 38 5.2. Categorisation of Substances ......................................................................................... 38 D 4.2 Scoping Documents for 2018 Security: Public WP 4 - Prioritisation and input to the Annual Work Plan Version: 3 Authors: Carolin Tschersich, Robert Barouki, Maria Uhl, Jana Klánová, Milena Horvat, Page: 3 Alessandro Alimonti, Denis Sarigiannis, Tiina Santonen, Erik Lebret, Greet Schoeters 5.3. Objectives / Policy-related questions .............................................................................. 50 5.4. Research activities to be undertaken .............................................................................. 51 5.5. References ..................................................................................................................... 56 6. Prioritised substance group: Flame retardants (FR) ............................................................... 60 6.1. Background Information .................................................................................................. 60 6.1.1. Hazardous Properties .............................................................................................. 60 6.1.2. Exposure Characteristics ......................................................................................... 61 6.1.3. Policy Relevance ..................................................................................................... 62 6.1.4. Societal Aspects ...................................................................................................... 63 6.2. Categorisation of Substances ......................................................................................... 65 6.3. Objectives / Policy-related questions .............................................................................. 69 6.4. Research activities to be undertaken .............................................................................. 69 6.5. References ..................................................................................................................... 77 7. Prioritised substance group: Cadmium (Cd) and Hexavalent Chromium (Cr VI) ..................... 87 7.1. Background Information .................................................................................................. 87 7.1.1. Hazardous properties:.............................................................................................. 87 7.1.2. Exposure characteristics: ......................................................................................... 88 7.1.3. Policy relevance....................................................................................................... 91 7.1.4. Technical aspects (Nordberg et al., 2015, Bernard et al 2016) ................................. 93 7.1.5. Societal concern: ..................................................................................................... 95 7.2. Categorisation of Substances ......................................................................................... 96 7.3. Objectives / Policy-related questions .............................................................................. 96 7.4. Research activities to be undertaken .............................................................................. 98 7.5. References ..................................................................................................................... 99 8. Prioritised substance group: PAHs and air pollutants ........................................................... 101 8.1. Background Information ................................................................................................ 101 8.1.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 101 8.1.2. Hazardous properties: e.g. ..................................................................................... 101 8.1.3. Air pollutants .......................................................................................................... 103 8.1.4. Exposure characteristics .......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analytical Standards for Human Exposure Analysis
    ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. isotope.com Analytical Standards for Human Exposure Analysis Human Personal Care Industrial Products Pollution Dermal Inhalation Ingestion Food Tobacco Products Drinking Water Pharmaceuticals Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. North America: 1.800.322.1174 [email protected] | International: +1.978.749.8000 [email protected] | fax: 1.978.749.2768 | isotope.com Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. | Analytical Standards for Human Exposure Analysis Analytical Standards for Human Exposure Analysis Exposomics is the study of the exposome and is a field that has been gaining attention as researchers focus not only on identifying contaminants present in the environment, but their effects on humans. The exposome encompasses an individual’s lifetime exposure to internal and external stresses, including environmental, dietary, and metabolic factors, to name a few. Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc. (CIL) has and continues to produce standards that are used in many leading biomonitoring research projects, such as the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) “National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)” and the Japan National Institute for Environmental Studies (NIES) “Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS).” The CDC’s NHANES program is focused on assessing the health and nutritional status of both children and adults in the United States. There are several studies involved in this program, which is notable in that both interviews and physical examinations are factored in when compiling data. The first NHANES study was conducted from 1971-1975 and subsequent studies are continuing to this day. Additional information about the NHANES program can be found at www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/index.htm.
    [Show full text]
  • Priority Pollutant, Endocrine Disruptor, and Chemical Contaminant Standards Solutions for a Greener World Introduction
    Priority Pollutant, Endocrine Disruptor, and Chemical Contaminant Standards Solutions for a Greener World Introduction Priority Pollutant, Endocrine Disruptor, and Chemical Contaminant Standards isotope.com Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Product Halogenated and Substituted Benzene Standards and Phenol Standards Concern about environmental and human exposure to Many industrial and consumer products are composed of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) has grown chemicals that contain halogenated or substituted benzene significantly. This classification encompasses a broad range of or phenol functional groups. Resistant to decomposition and chemicals, ranging from antibiotics to hormones to pesticides. metabolism, these chemicals may persist even after the parent One common theme among these groups is the need for molecule has undergone partial decomposition, or they may high-quality isotopically labeled standards to strengthen the exist as a product or an industrial byproduct. The increased analysis of PPCPs in difficult matrices such as sewage sludge use of brominated compounds is expected to lead to more and wastewater. CIL, with guidance from leading laboratories brominated benzenes and phenols in the environment, and around the world, works diligently to produce representative the continued presence of chlorinated compounds ensures standards for the analysis of PPCPs. that chlorinated benzenes and phenols will be found in the environment for years to come. Food and Drinking Water Analysis Standards Bisphenol Standards Increased attention to possible contamination of food and Bisphenol A (BPA) is a synthetic compound that has long been water has caused analysts to broaden the scope of trace food used in the production of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy and water testing by IDMS.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation on Perfluorinated Compound Treatment Options for Drinking Water
    Recommendation on Perfluorinated Compound Treatment Options for Drinking Water New Jersey Drinking Water Quality Institute Treatment Subcommittee June 2015 Laura Cummings, P.E., Chair Anthony Matarazzo Norman Nelson, P.E. Fred Sickels Carol T. Storms Background At the request of the Commissioner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection the Drinking Water Quality Institute (DWQI) is working to develop recommended Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCL) for three long-chain perfluorinated compounds (PFC): Perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS). The Treatment Subcommittee of the Drinking Water Quality Institute is responsible for identifying available treatment technologies or methods for removal of hazardous contaminants from drinking water. The subcommittee has met several times over the last year beginning in July 2014 to discuss and investigate best available treatment options for the long-chain (8 – 9 carbon) PFCs identified above. The subcommittee decided to research and report on treatment options for all three compounds, as the treatment options are not expected to differ from compound to compound due to their similar properties (e.g. persistence, water solubility, similar structure, strong carbon-fluorine bonds, and high polarity). This approach contrasts with the other two subcommittees which will address the three compounds separately. The subcommittee has gathered and reviewed data from several sources in order to identify widely-accepted and well-performing strategies for removal of long-chain PFCs, including use of alternate sources. This report is intended to present the subcommittee’s findings. At this time, there are no Federal drinking water standards for PFNA, PFOA or PFOS; however in 2009 the United State Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA, 2009) established a Provisional Health Advisory (PHA) level of 0.4 µg/L for PFOA and 0.2 µg/L PHA for PFOS for short-term exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Technical Paper on the Identification and Assessment Of
    UNITED NATIONS SC UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/17 Distr.: General 15 August 2012 English only Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee Eighth meeting Geneva, 15–19 October 2012 Item 5 (g) of the provisional agenda* Technical work: assessment of alternatives to perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in open applications Technical paper on the identification and assessment of alternatives to the use of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in open applications Note by the Secretariat 1. In paragraph 6 of decision SC-5/5, the Conference of the Parties to the Stockholm Convention requested the Secretariat, subject to the availability of resources, to commission a technical paper on the identification and assessment of alternatives to the use of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in open applications for consideration by the Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee at its eighth meeting. 2. That technical paper has been prepared, with financial support provided by the Government of Norway, on the basis of the terms of reference and an outline developed by the Committee at its seventh meeting. It is set out in the annex to the present note, where it is presented without formal editing. * UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/1. K1282361 110912 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/17 Annex Technical paper on the identification and assessment of alternatives to the use of perfluorooctane sulfonic acid in open applications 2 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/17 Table of contents Executive summary.........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Levels of Perfluorinated Compounds in New Jersey Fish, Surface Water, and Sediment
    Investigation of Levels of Perfluorinated Compounds in New Jersey Fish, Surface Water, and Sediment New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Science, Research, and Environmental Health SR15-010 June 18, 2018 Updated April 9, 2019 Lead Investigators: Sandra M. Goodrow, Ph.D., Bruce Ruppel, Lee Lippincott, Ph.D., Gloria B. Post, Ph.D., D.A.B.T. 1 Executive Summary Per- and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS) are used in the manufacture of useful products that impart stain resistance, water resistance, heat resistance and other desirable properties. PFAS are also used in various Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) that are used in fire-fighting. These substances are in wide use today, found at industrial sites that use or manufacture them and at military bases, airports and other areas known for fire-fighting activities. A subset of PFAS, perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), have fully fluorinated carbon chains as their backbone, and their extremely strong carbon-fluorine bonds makes them very resistant to degradation. When released to the environment, PFCs persist indefinitely and can travel distances from their source in surface water, groundwater, or in the atmosphere. PFAS are considered “emerging contaminants” because additional information on their presence and toxicity to ecosystems and humans continues to become available. The Division of Science, Research and Environmental Health (DSREH) performed an initial assessment of 13 PFAS, all of which are perfluorinated compounds (PFCs), at 11 waterways across the state. Fourteen surface water and sediment samples and 94 fish tissue samples were collected at sites along these waterways. The sites were selected based on their proximity to potential sources of PFAS and their likelihood of being used for recreational and fishing purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemicals Americas
    Chemicals in the Americas November 30, 2017 The Houston Club, Houston TX www.bdlaw.com/2017ChemicalsConference Global Influences on National Chemical Laws Russ LaMotte, Managing Principal, Beveridge & Diamond www.bdlaw.com/2017ChemicalsConference Goals • Identify key global KEY TAKEAWAYS drivers of chemicals Your takeaways policy here • Flag opportunities to track and influence www.bdlaw.com/2017ChemicalsConference 3 Agenda 1. Global Outlook 2. European Union & REACH: Global Impacts KEY TAKEAWAYS 3. Multilateral Treaties Your takeaways here − Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants − Rotterdam Convention on Prior Informed Consent 4. Other Pressure Points − UN Environment Assembly (UNEA) − Strategic Approach to International Chemicals Management (SAICM) www.bdlaw.com/2017ChemicalsConference 4 New Section/Subsection Divider OptionGlobal 2 – Picture Outlook Background Global Chemical Policy Initiatives International Orgs Key National Regimes OECD European Union WHO United States (TSCA) FAO Canada APEC Japan UNEA Australia China SAICM CA/WA/OR/MN UNECE (GHS) Multilateral Treaties NGOs IPEN Stockholm (PBTs) Greenpeace (“detox”) Rotterdam PIC SIN (hazardous chemicals trade) Retailers/Purchasers Basel (hazardous Walmart waste) Target Montreal Protocol WERCs (ODS and HFCs) Green procurement Minimata Mercury Market deselection Restricted Chemicals Lists Global Chemical Policy Initiatives International Orgs Key National Regimes OECD European Union WHO United States (TSCA) FAO Canada APEC Japan UNEA Australia China SAICM CA/WA/OR/MN
    [Show full text]
  • Petersburgh Landfill Site No
    PETERSBURH LANDFILL SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT WORK ASSIGNMENT D007622-36 PETERSBURGH LANDFILL SITE NO. 442054 PETERSBURGH RENSSELAER COUNTY, NY Prepared for: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 625 Broadway, Albany, New York Basil Seggos, Commissioner DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION Remedial Bureau B URS Corporation 257 West Genesee Street Suite 400 Buffalo, New York 14202 Final May 2017 SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT CERTIFICATION !, lA;~\Z L L.,""~ l.-1 · , certify that I am currently a NYS registered professional engineer (No.014-01 S) or Qualified Environmental Professional and that this Site Characterization Report was prepared in accordance with all applicable statutes and regulations and in substantial conformance with the DER Technical Guidance for Site Investigation and Remediation (DER-10) and that all activities were performed in full accordance with the DER-approved work plan and any DER-ap_proved modifications. v J\ProjectMOS221lO_P""1bur&~De!Mnbles\SOl-SilcCharecuriZlllioo~l..vldlillSileChanllurizllioo·Rnised~O~l700c:Jc SITE CHARACTERIZATION REPORT PETERSBURGH LANDFILL SITE ID NO. 442054 PETERSBURGH, NEW YORK PREPARED FOR: NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION DIVISION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION WORK ASSIGNMENT NO. D007622-36 PREPARED BY: URS CORPORATION 257 WEST GENESEE STREET, SUITE 400 BUFFALO, NEW YORK 14202 FINAL MAY 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gastrointestinal Elimination of Perfluorinated Compounds Using Cholestyramine and Chlorella Pyrenoidosa
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation ISRN Toxicology Volume 2013, Article ID 657849, 8 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/657849 Research Article Gastrointestinal Elimination of Perfluorinated Compounds Using Cholestyramine and Chlorella pyrenoidosa Stephen J. Genuis,1 Luke Curtis,2 and Detlef Birkholz3 1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Alberta, 2935-66 Street, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6K 4C1 2 Forest Hills, NY 11375, USA 3 ALS Laboratory Group, University of Alberta and Environmental Division, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6E 5C1 Correspondence should be addressed to Stephen J. Genuis; [email protected] Received 8 June 2013; Accepted 4 August 2013 Academic Editors: Y. C. Hseu and T. E. Stoker Copyright © 2013 Stephen J. Genuis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Background. While perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) are a family of commonly used synthetic compounds with many applications, some PFCs remain persistent within the human body due, in part, to enterohepatic recirculation and renal tubular reabsorption. With increasing recognition of potential harm to human health associated with PFC bioaccumulation, interventions to facilitate elimination of these toxicants are welcome in order to potentially preclude or overcome illness. Minimal research has been undertaken thus far on methods to accelerate human clearance of PFCs. Methods. To test for possible oral treatments to hasten PFC elimination, a group of individuals with elevated PFC levels was treated with cholestyramine (CSM) and, after a break, was subsequently treated with Chlorella pyrenoidosa (CP).Stoolsampleswerecollectedfromallparticipants(i)priortoanytreatment, (ii) during treatment with CSM, and (iii) during treatment with CP.
    [Show full text]
  • Perfluorinated Compounds, Bishenol a and Acetaminophen in Selected Waste Water Treatment Plants in and Around Cape Town, South Africa
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Cape Peninsula University of Technology PERFLUORINATED COMPOUNDS, BISHENOL A AND ACETAMINOPHEN IN SELECTED WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANTS IN AND AROUND CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA. by ADEOLA PATIENCE ADELEYE Thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Technology: Chemistry in the Faculty of Applied Sciences at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology Supervisor: Prof B J Ximba Co Supervisor: Prof O S Fatoki External Co- Supervisor: Prof L F Petrik CAPE TOWN 2016 CPUT Copyright Information This thesis may not be published either in part (in scholarly, scientific or technical journals), or as a whole (as a monograph), unless permission has been obtained from the university DECLARATION I, ADEOLA PATIENCE ADELEYE, declare that the contents of this thesis represent my own work, and that the thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any other qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology Signed Date i ABSTRACT The release of wastewater to the aquatic environment is most likely to introduce some trace levels of organic contaminants, some of which may be toxic, carcinogenic, or endocrine disruptors, as well as, persistent in the environment. Additionally, increasing contamination of surface waters by wastewater effluents has made water treatment processes more challenging and expensive. The presence of these pollutants in the receiving water body may have negative effects on aquatic species and often pose potential human health risks through the reuse of treated wastewater for drinking purposes and other household use.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 4,617,057 Plueddemann 45) Date of Patent: Oct
    United States Patent (19) 11) Patent Number: 4,617,057 Plueddemann 45) Date of Patent: Oct. 14, 1986 54 OIL AND WATER REPELLENT COATING COMPOST ONS OTHER PUBLICATIONS N. L. Jarvis et al. in Contact Angle, Wettability and Ad (75) Inventor: Edwin P. Plueddemann, Midland, hesion, pp. 317-331, American Chemical Society, Wash Mich. ington, D.C. (1964). 73 Assignee: Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, Primary Examiner-Amelia B. Yarbrough Mich. Attorney, Agent, or Firm-James E. Bittell 21 Appl. No.: 741,642 57 ABSTRACT An oil and water repellent coating composition is dis 22 Filed: Jun. 4, 1985 closed. The composition comprises a blend of an ami 51) Int. Cl................................................. CO9K 3/18 noorganosilane, a perfluorinated organic compound 52 U.S.C. ........................................................ 106/2 and a resin selected from the group consisting of colloi 58) Field of Search ............................ 106/2; 8/115.54 dal inorganic-based siloxane resin, poly (dialkylsilox ane)-monoorgano substituted silisesquioxane block co 56) References Cited polymer, acrylic polymer and copolymer, ethylene U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS vinyl acetate latex and styrene-butadiene latex. The silane and perfluorinated organic, combined, constitute 3,317,629 5/1967 Quaal ....... ... 260/827 from 0.1% to 10% by weight of the total resin solids in 3,681,266 8/1972 Domba .................................. 260/25 a solution or suspension of the blend. A method of coat 4,070,152 1/1978 Pentz .................................... 8/115.6 ing a smooth substrate or treating a fabric to render the 4,410,563 10/1983 Richter et al. ...................... 427/08 respective surface oleophobic and hydrophobic is fur FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ther disclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview of Prioritized Substances
    Overview of prioritized substances Content 1 Phthalates/DINCH ............................................................................................................................................ 1 2 Bisphenols ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 3 Per-/Polyfluorinated compounds .................................................................................................................... 16 4 Flame Retardants ............................................................................................................................................ 20 5 Cd, Cr (to be added) ........................................................................................................................................ 26 6 PAHs and air pollutants .................................................................................................................................. 32 7 Anilin family: MOCA ...................................................................................................................................... 36 8 Chemical mixtures ........................................................................................................................................... 39 9 Emerging chemicals ........................................................................................................................................ 39 ANNEX: GANTT CHARTS (OLD) ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Factors Affecting Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Hormone Levels
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Environmental Factors Affecting Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone and Thyroid Hormone Levels Mirjana Babi´cLeko , Ivana Gunjaˇca , Nikolina Plei´c and Tatijana Zemunik * Department of Medical Biology, School of Medicine, University of Split, Šoltanska 2, 21000 Split, Croatia; [email protected] (M.B.L.); [email protected] (I.G.); [email protected] (N.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +385-21-557-888 Abstract: Thyroid hormones are necessary for the normal functioning of physiological systems. Therefore, knowledge of any factor (whether genetic, environmental or intrinsic) that alters the levels of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and thyroid hormones is crucial. Genetic factors contribute up to 65% of interindividual variations in TSH and thyroid hormone levels, but many environmental factors can also affect thyroid function. This review discusses studies that have analyzed the impact of environmental factors on TSH and thyroid hormone levels in healthy adults. We included lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet and exercise) and pollutants (chemicals and heavy metals). Many inconsistencies in the results have been observed between studies, making it difficult to draw a general conclusion about how a particular environmental factor influences TSH and thyroid hormone levels. However, lifestyle factors that showed the clearest association with TSH and thyroid hormones were smoking, body mass index (BMI) and iodine (micronutrient taken from the diet). Smoking mainly led to a decrease in TSH levels and an increase in triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) levels, while BMI levels were positively correlated with TSH and free T3 levels. Excess iodine led to an increase in TSH levels and a decrease in thyroid hormone levels.
    [Show full text]