153 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions And
Appendix 5 Station Descriptions and Technical Overview Stage 2 light rail transit (LRT) stations will follow the same standards, design principles, and connectivity and mobility requirements as Stage 1 Confederation Line. Proponent Teams were instructed, through the guidelines outlined in the Project Agreement (PA), to design stations that will integrate with Stage 1, which include customer facilities, accessibility features, and the ability to support the City’s Transportation Master Plan (TMP) goals for public transit and ridership growth. The station features planned for the Stage 2 LRT Project will be designed and built on these performance standards which include: Barrier-free path of travel to entrances of stations; Accessible fare gates at each entrance, providing easy access for customers using mobility devices or service animals; Tactile wayfinding tiles will trace the accessible route through the fare gates, to elevators, platforms and exits; Transecure waiting areas on the train platform will include accessible benches and tactile/Braille signs indicating the direction of service; Tactile warning strips and inter-car barriers to keep everyone safely away from the platform edge; Audio announcements and visual displays for waiting passengers will precede each train’s arrival on the platform and will describe the direction of travel; Service alerts will be shown visually on the passenger information display monitors and announced audibly on the public-address system; All wayfinding and safety signage will be provided following the applicable accessibility standards (including type size, tactile signage, and appropriate colour contrast); Clear, open sight lines and pedestrian design that make wayfinding simple and intuitive; and, Cycling facilities at all stations including shelter for 80 per cent of the provided spaces, with additional space protected to ensure cycling facilities can be doubled and integrated into the station’s footprint. -
Phase One Environmental Site Assessment: Update
* Environmental Site Assessments * Environmental Compliance Audits EMG * Subsurface Soil & Groundwater Studies * Geotechnical Soil Investigations THE ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. * Planning Strategies & Cost Analysis ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNERS, CONSULTANTS & ENGINEERS * Site Remediation & Project Management 29 QUEEN ANNE ROAD, ETOBICOKE, ONTARIO CANADA M8X 1T1 416-239-6643 FAX: 416-239-0300 E-MAIL: [email protected] WEB SITE: www.emgcanada.com PHASE ONE ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT: UPDATE For the subject property located at 2148 Carling Avenue Ottawa, Ontario Prepared for: Starbank Developments 2148 Corp. 329 Brooke Avenue Toronto, Ontario M5M 2L4 Project No. 2305-13 June 10th, 2013 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT: This environmental document contains confidential and privileged information prepared by our firm for the named person(s) and/or the specified company only. No copy and distribution, or disclosure is permitted without written consent from this firm. EMG takes no responsibility or liability for the unauthorized use of this confidential report by third parties. THE ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT GROUP LTD. Project No. 2305-13 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Our firm was originally retained by the client/ property owner, Starbank Developments 2148 Corp., to prepare a Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA1) for the subject site at 2148 Carling Avenue in Ottawa, Ontario. Our ESA1 Report dated September 2009 raised several potential environmental concerns with the subject site and recommended an ESA2 investigation of subsurface soil and groundwater conditions as well as a building materials Survey for Asbestos, Lead, PCBs and Mercury. Between September 2009 and December 2011, our firm completed four (4) additional environmental studies including a Supplementary Building Materials Survey (2009); a Phase Two Environmental Site Assessment (2009); an Asbestos, Lead, Mercury and PCB Abatement Report (2010); and a Supplementary Asbestos, Mercury and PCB Abatement Report (2011). -
Project Synopsis
Final Draft Road Network Development Report Submitted to the City of Ottawa by IBI Group September 2013 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ............................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................. 1 1.3 Report Structure .................................................................................................. 3 2. Background Information ...................................................................... 4 2.1 The TRANS Screenline System ......................................................................... 4 2.2 The TRANS Forecasting Model ......................................................................... 4 2.3 The 2008 Transportation Master Plan ............................................................... 7 2.4 Progress Since 2008 ........................................................................................... 9 Community Design Plans and Other Studies ................................................................. 9 Environmental Assessments ........................................................................................ 10 Approvals and Construction .......................................................................................... 10 3. Needs and Opportunities .................................................................. -
Dr. Hossen Lokhat Planning Rationale for 348 Woodroffe Avenue: Zoning
Dr. Hossen Lokhat Planning Rationale for 348 Woodroffe Avenue: Zoning By-law Amendment June 24, 2010 Prepared by: 14 Colonnade Road, Suite 150 Ottawa ON K2E 7M6 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction............................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Subject Property...............................................................................1 3.0 Current Zoning for the Site ..................................................................................2 4.0 History of Zoning for the Site ...............................................................................2 5.0 Area Context and Adjacent Uses..........................................................................3 6.0 Transportation and Transit Network ..................................................................3 7.0 Proposed Zoning ....................................................................................................3 8.0 Policy Framework .................................................................................................3 8.1 Provincial Policy Statement (2005).................................................................3 8.2 City of Ottawa Official Plan (2003)................................................................4 9.0 Regulatory Framework .........................................................................................7 9.1 City of Ottawa Comprehensive Zoning By-law 2008-250............................7 10.0 Requested Zoning By-law Amendment ...............................................................8 -
Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project
Alexandra Bridge Replacement Project PUBLIC CONSULTATION REPORT OCTOBER TO DECEMBE R , 2 0 2 0 Table of Contents I. Project description .................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Background ........................................................................................................................................ 3 B. Project requirements ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Project timeline ................................................................................................................................ 4 D. Project impacts ............................................................................................................................. 4 II. Public consultation process............................................................................................................ 5 A. Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 5 a. Consultation objectives ............................................................................................................ 5 b. Dates and times ............................................................................................................................ 5 B. Consultation procedure and tools .......................................................................................... -
Where to Dispose of Used Needles and Crack Pipes
WHERE TO DISPOSE OF USED NEEDLES AND CRACK PIPES For the health and safety of our community and sanitation workers, sharps (needles, crack pipes/glass stems) and other biohazardous waste must be disposed of properly and not placed in the garbage or recycling bins (By-law 2006-396, Schedule “J”). Residents should place their sharps in a non-breakable, puncture-proof container with a lid (no larger than a two litre pop bottle or measurements 15” by 4 ½ “), and drop it off at one of the City’s Needle Drop Boxes listed below. Containers larger than a two litre pop bottle can be dropped off at the Ottawa Public Health offices located at 100 Constellation Drive or 179 Clarence Street. Pharmacies participating in the Take It Back! Program also accepts used needles. Locations of these pharmacies are listed on the reverse side of this sheet. One-day Household Hazardous Waste Depots located at various sites across the City also accept used needles. For the schedule of operation, please visit Ottawa.ca/recycle and click on Disposal of Special Items. For more information regarding the City’s Needle Disposal Program please visit Ottawa.ca/health. LOCATION OF NEEDLE DROP BOXES AIDS Committee of Ottawa Fire Stations Parking Garage 700-251 Bank Street - Inside 141 Clarence Street - Outside 2355 Alta Vista Drive – Outside 200 Beechwood Avenue - Outside Bell Pharmacy Queensway-Carleton Hospital 1700 Blair Road – Outside 737 Gladstone Avenue - Outside 3045 Baseline Road - Outside 1445 Carling Avenue – Outside Bellevue Community Centre (OCH) 500 Charlemagne -
Nepean Kanata Barracudas Welcome to Long Course Invitational April 13-15, 2018
Nepean Kanata Barracudas Welcome to Long Course Invitational April 13-15, 2018 Hosted by: The Nepean Kanata Barracudas Swim Club Nepean Sportsplex 1701 Woodroffe Avenue Nepean, ON K2G 1W2 Sanctioned by: Swim Ontario General Information Date: April 13 – 15, 2018 Hosted by: Nepean Kanata Barracudas Location: Nepean Sportsplex, 1701 Woodroffe Ave. Nepean, ON K2G 1W2 Facility: 8-lane, 50m competition pool with Kieffer lane ropes and Quantum electronic timing and scoreboard. Competition Coordinator: Doug Nielsen Meet Manager: Megan Dodge - [email protected] Officials: Christie McMann – [email protected] Sanction: Sanctioned by Swim Ontario. All current Swimming/Natation Canada (SNC) rules will be followed. Please note that Swimming Canada Competition Warm-Up Safety Procedures will be in effect. The full document can be viewed HERE. For club and provincial meets, a swimsuit that covers more of the body such as modesty swimwear or religious cover- ups is permitted providing that the fabric is permeable open mesh textile material and does not give the swimmer an advantage. The full interpretation can be viewed HERE. Advanced notification or for clarification of interpretation please see the Competition Coordinator. Eligibility: All athletes must be registered as Competitive swimmers with SNC, or any other amateur swimming organization recognized by FINA. A valid SNC registration number is required for all Canadian swimmers, and entries without a SNC registration number will be declined entry. Split Times: The procedure for obtaining an 'Official Split' now requires that coaches make the request to the session referee or meet management on the “Official Split Request” form prior to the race. The split for the lead-off leg in relays will still be regarded as an official split and therefore no request by coaches is needed for relays. -
Bells Corners Community Improvement Plan 1
Document 2 Bells Corners Community Improvement Plan 1. Background Bells Corners has been identified as needing economic development activity, particularly, measures are needed to incent urban revitalization. Over the last several decades, the quality and vibrancy of the Robertson Road corridor, between the CN Railway bridge on the east and the City-owned railway bridge (now a multi-purpose pathway) on the west, has declined significantly, resulting in a lack of business investment; declining levels of property maintenance; and the closure, downsizing, and/or relocation of many existing businesses. Some 468 business have closed or moved away from Bells Corners in this period, and well-known brands like Staples, IKEA, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Wendy's, 2nd Cup, Alexanian Carpet, Burger King, Arby's, Baskin-Robbins, and Pizza Hut are all long gone. Hurley’s, a former thriving restaurant, was replaced by Local Heroes, but now it too has downsized and moved across the street, leaving a large vacant building. The restaurant that initially opened as Corkscrew Restaurant at 3795 Richmond Road (now 1961 Robertson Road) has housed a long list of businesses since Corkscrew’s failure, including Buffet Palace, Vox Lounge, Houston's Restaurant, and Miss Saigon, but now all have failed, and the building has been torn down and the land sits vacant. The purpose of this Community Improvement Plan (CIP) is to encourage and facilitate rehabilitation, redevelopment, and revitalization of the existing built environment while providing enhanced employment opportunities, all of which are important for the health and liveability of this section of Bells Corners. The CIP benefits private landowners undertaking redevelopment projects on private property; however, the eligibility and reporting criteria require that the tenants creating the jobs are made aware of the CIP incentives so they can negotiate appropriate lease terms with complete information. -
Kitchissippi Talks CONTENTS Executive Summary 03 Context 04 Methodology 05 Findings 06 Ideas 08 Observations 09 About Synapcity 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 3
2018 REPORT Kitchissippi Talks CONTENTS Executive Summary 03 Context 04 Methodology 05 Findings 06 Ideas 08 Observations 09 About Synapcity 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Page 3 Nineteen people gathered at Causeway Work Centre in Participants recognized that Kitchissippi is a very January 2018 to come up with a vision of Kitchissippi for engaged neighbourhood, with bustling main streets, Civcs Talks. This is a process developed by Synapcity to unique shops and restaurants, and lots of green space. At help people understand the power of coming together, the same time, more people are moving into Kitchissippi discover a shared connection to place, and inspire people and the area is growing and developing. This changing to take action to make their neighbourhoods even better. demographic is affecting the ward’s landscape. This kind of dialogue promotes CityMaking, empowering people to look at community issues together, Participants wanted every voice in their ward to be forming bonds. heard. They feared that those who are currently engaged will eventually burn out and they want to make sure that Participants explored reasons some people don’t have the there is a strong sense of community cohesion. Two ideas spirit of community engagement and explored how they for initiatives came out of Kitchissippi Talks, one of which can encourage them to get involved. Finally, they came up was Jane’s Mob, held on May 3rd 2018. with ideas that could help Kitchissippi thrive even more. CONTEXT Page 4 The Kitchissippi Ward is composed of seven different neighbourhoods: Hintonburg - Mechanicsville, Wellington Village, Westboro, Laurentian and parts of Woodroffe - Lincoln Heights, parts of Carlingwood West - Glabar Park - McKellar Heights, and parts of Civic Hospital - Central Park. -
1.0 Introduction
1.0 Introduction This Planning Rationale has been prepared in accordance with the requirements for a Zoning By‐law Amendment (ZBLA) application. The purpose of the rationale is to assess the appropriateness of the proposed development at 200 Lockhart Avenue (and the requested Zoning By‐law Amendment) in the context of the community, the site, existing and planned infrastructure and public policy for change and growth in the municipality. The proposed zoning is outlined in Section 1. The community context and policy analysis are presented in Sections 2 and 3 of this report. The findings of applicable supporting studies and reports are summarized in Section 4. Section 5 provides a rationale in favor of the proposed development. Site Location The site is located at 200 Lockhart Avenue in Nepean, south of Richmond Road and east of Woodroffe Avenue. The site location is illustrated on Figure 1 within its wider community context. Figure 1: Site Location 200 Lockhart Avenue – Planning Rationale, July 2011 Existing Development Overview of Proposal The site currently accommodates the Carlingwood YMCA. The YMCA is a one (1) storey Claridge Homes is proposing to redevelop the site with an eight (8) storey retirement and building consisting of recreational facilities including a pool and canoe storage for the YCCC residential care facility. The retirement and residential care facility will accommodate 118 canoe club. This YMCA location has been undergoing financial difficulties and has decided to dwelling units and 29 assisted living units. The intent is to provide a home for seniors rationalize its activities and sell the property. The property has been recently sold to requiring different levels of service. -
CSS Brochure
Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre Community Support Services Services available to you in Stittsville, Kanata and Nepean Contact us! 613-591-3686 Option 3 wocrc.community BRINGING CARE supportservices.ca &COMMUNITY TOGETHER [email protected] COMMUNITY SUPPORT SERVICES Our Community Support Services are available to seniors aged 55+ and adults with a physical disability living in the communities of Kanata, Stittsville, Nepean and West Carleton. 613-591-2501 Community Support Services are for individuals who need support to function independently at home, because of a disability, illness or limitation due to aging. Also known as home and community care, these services help individuals live at home and keep connected with their community. facebook.com/ Community Support Services are based on guiding beliefs that value WOCRC.CRCOO empowerment, equity, partnership and innovation. This is translated into meaningful, caring and personalized service, in order to enhance self-esteem and promote independence at home. @WOCRC_CRCOO Eligibility criteria may apply. These services are provided by volunteers and paid workers who have been screened (including a police record check for the vulnerable sector). All are trained by staff at the Western Ottawa Community Resource Centre. wocrc.ca The WOCRC tries to accommodate all requests for service; however this depends on the availability of volunteers and paid workers. For further information or to access these services, please call 613-591-3686 and choose option 3. If you live outside of Kanata, Nepean or West Carleton, please use Caredove (https://www.caredove.com/champlaincss) to find the nearest providers of 2 MacNeil Court these services. Kanata, ON K2L 4H7 Updated March 2019 BN: 12821 9201 RR 0001 Services Available 613-591-3686, option 3 Financial subsidy may be available for any of the services. -
Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-Comité Du Patrimoine Bâti August 13, 2015 / 13 Août 2015
1 Report to Rapport au: Built Heritage Sub-Committee / Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti August 13, 2015 / 13 août 2015 and / et Planning Committee / Comité de l'urbanisme August 25, 2015 / 25 août 2015 and Council / et au Conseil September 9, 2015 / 9 septembre 2015 Submitted on July 13, 2015 Soumis le 13 juillet 2015 Submitted by Soumis par: John L. Moser, Acting Deputy City Manager / Directeur municipal adjoint par intérim, Planning and Infrastructure / Urbanisme et Infrastructure Contact Person Personne ressource: Lee Ann Snedden, Acting Chief / Chef par intérim, Development Review Services / Services d’Examen des projets d'aménagement, Planning and Growth Management / Urbanisme et Gestion de la croissance (613) 580-2424, 25779, [email protected] Report Author / Auteur du rapport: Lesley Collins, Planner II /Urbaniste II, Development Review Services / Services d’Examen des projets d’aménagement, Heritage Services Section / Section des Services du Patrimoine (613) 580-2424, 21586, [email protected] 2 Ward: KITCHISSIPPI (15) File Number: ACS2015-PAI-PGM-0050 SUBJECT: Designation of the Champlain Oil Company Service Station, 70 Richmond Road, under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act OBJET: Désignation de la station-service de la Champlain Oil Company, située au 70, chemin Richmond, aux termes de la partie IV de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario REPORT RECOMMENDATION That the Built Heritage Sub-Committee recommend that Planning Committee recommend Council issue a Notice of Intention to designate 70 Richmond Road under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act according to the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value, attached as Document 5. RECOMMANDATION DU RAPPORT Que le Sous-comité du patrimoine bâti recommande au Comité de l’urbanisme de recommander à son tour au Conseil de publier un avis d’intention de désigner la propriété située au 70, chemin Richmond, aux termes de la partie IV de la Loi sur le patrimoine de l’Ontario, conformément à la déclaration de valeur sur le plan du patrimoine culturel faisant l’objet du document 5.