DOCSLIB.ORG

Deposit and Copying Declaration Form

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Deposit and Copying Declaration Form The Life of the Mind: An Intellectual Biography of Richard Hofstadter Andrew Ronald Snodgrass Jesus College This dissertation is submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy November 2018 Abstract The Life of the Mind: An Intellectual Biography of Richard Hofstadter Andrew Ronald Snodgrass Despite his death in 1970, Richard Hofstadter’s work continues to have an enduring influence in American political culture. Yet despite the continued and frequent use of his interpretations in public discourse, his reputation within historical scholarship remains, to a large degree, shaped by perceptions that were formed towards the end of his career. The narrative pervades of Hofstadter as the archetypal New York intellectual who rejected his youthful radicalism for political conservatism which, in turn, shaped his consensus vision of the past. These assessments reflect the biographical tendency to read a life and career backwards. From such a vantage point, Hofstadter’s work is viewed through the prism of his perceived final position. My dissertation challenges the accepted narrative by considering his writing in the context of the period of time in which it was written. In doing so, it is evident that his work belies attempts to reduce his scholarship to reflections of a shifting political standpoint. Whilst it is undoubted that Hofstadter’s historical and political view changed through time, there was a remarkable consistency to his thought. Throughout his career, his writing and lectures were suffused with a sense of the contingency of truth. It was the search for new uncertainties rather than the capture of truth which was central to his work. It was also fundamental to his politics. The sense of ambiguity and complexity that pervaded Hofstadter’s writing and informed his political viewpoints was, I argue, a reflection of personal temperament. Naturally shy, his early correspondence shows a marked diffidence and ambivalence in the face of personal and political choice. The writing of history not only reflected this ambivalence but provided a means of working though it and of determining his own intellectual and political position. In this respect, Hofstadter provides his own self-narrative within his work. It is Hofstadter’s own voice that provides the direction for my study. Perhaps more importantly, it is a voice that continues to provide instruction for those who would seek a role for the historian at the centre of the intellectual and political life of the nation. Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to the financial support that I have received from a number of sources since the commencement of my studies. I thank The Worshipful Company of Cutlers for the award of a Craythorne Scholarship and the Stapley Educational Trust for the provision of a grant. My archival research was made possible by the generous support of the History Faculty and the award of several Trust Fund grants. In addition, I have been fortunate to receive assistance from the Access to Learning Fund and Jesus College. In the absence of funding, this support has been essential to my progress. Above all, my thesis is heavily indebted to the honesty, integrity, and continual encouragement of Michael O’Brien and Andrew Preston. I thank Michael for his initial support of my project and for the wise guidance he provided throughout his time as supervisor. It is impossible to express the impact that he has had on both my writing and my thought. I thank Andrew for stepping in at a difficult time and steering me through the final years of my study. I could not wish for a more dedicated and attentive supervisor. During stressful times, he has brought a sense of calm reassurance. Furthermore, the thesis owes much to his perceptive reading and insightful comments. I should also like to thank Michael Heale and Richard King, who have provided support and guidance over many years. It was Michael who first sparked my interest in American history, and Richard who directed me towards intellectual history. More importantly, their support and encouragement gave me the confidence to pursue my studies. The completion of a PhD can be a lonely process, all the more so when studying part- time, and there have been many times when it seemed like an impossible task. In these times the unceasing support and love of friends and family have been essential. For this, I am greatly indebted. In particular, I must thank Jill Walker without whom it is unlikely that I would have made it to the end. Her encouragement and positivity, at the darkest times, gave me the needed courage to continue. The completion of my thesis owes a great deal to her unfaltering confidence and belief. Lastly, this thesis is dedicated to the memory of Michael O’Brien. The world is an immeasurably poorer place for his absence. Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction 1 1. No Place To Go: The Student Years 16 2. Truth Happens: Social Darwinism in American Thought 44 3. Shifting Ground: The American Political Tradition 75 4. Chastened by Adversity – The Age of Reform 107 5. In Defence of Intellect: Anti-Intellectualism in American Life 140 6. A Nation Slouching Onwards: The Turbulent Sixties 175 Conclusion 209 Bibliography 215 1 Introduction Richard Hofstadter occupied a prominent position within the intellectual life of mid- twentieth century America. As De Witt Clinton Professor of History at Columbia University, and the author of two Pulitzer Prize winning works of history, he was considered one of the nation’s preeminent historians. Yet his influence extended well beyond the narrow confines of the academy. Throughout his career he had managed simultaneously to engage a scholarly and a public audience, his work garnering praise in academic journals and the popular press alike. During his lifetime, his ability to combine critical and commercial success had been unrivalled. Nevertheless, his death came at a point when a younger generation of historians had commenced the work of revising his key assumptions and conclusions. These challenges to Hofstadter’s historical interpretations set the terms of debate and coloured impressions of his work which have largely prevailed. Hofstadter would have been unsurprised by the failure of his conclusions to stand the test of time. He had always viewed his works as provisional, aware that any explanation of the past is necessarily limited and contingent. His historical works were conceived as contributions to the contemporary debate, spurs to discussion, rather than the final word on the historical record. It was this desire to write history of relevance to the present, and to challenge long held beliefs, that ensured his was an important voice at a critical time in the history of American liberalism. It also meant that, as the political culture changed, his interpretations appeared to lose their sense of urgency and relevance. As Michael Kazin suggests, Hofstadter came to be viewed as ‘an elegant ruin from a benighted age, an intellectual temple constructed from old- fashioned materials.’ Nevertheless, almost thirty years after Hofstadter’s death, Kazin’s title confidently declared, “Hofstadter Lives”.1 1 Michael Kazin, “Hofstadter Lives: Political Culture and Temperament in the Work of an American Historian,” Reviews in American History, 27, (1999), 335. 2 Despite the passing decades and altered political landscape, Hofstadter’s concepts have always retained a certain cultural currency within public political discourse. The pertinacious appeal, to significant sections of American society, of right-wing ideology and rhetoric continues to bemuse journalists and popular commentators on the left. Hofstadter provided a pre-packaged formula for analysis of the phenomenon. Terms such as ‘paranoid style’, ‘pseudo-conservatism’, ‘status politics’, and ‘anti- intellectualism’ swiftly entered the nation’s vernacular and continue to be used in discussions of the allure of right-wing politics in America.2 Until recently the persistence of these phrases in public discourse owed as much to the failure of political analysts to break free from mid-century interpretations of conservative thought as to Hofstadter’s epigrammatic style. However, the shifting of the political environment has, once again, brought a renewed relevance to his analysis. Within academic circles, Hofstadter’s interpretations are cited with less frequency and rarely without challenge. Nevertheless, the widespread attention received by David Brown’s 2006 biography of Hofstadter was indicative of, and indeed owed much to, the enduring interest of Hofstadter amongst historians and general readers alike.3 The publication offered a welcome opportunity for those within the historical profession to reconsider both his work and legacy.4 Whilst subsequent historical assessments of 2 Since the beginning of the 2016 election campaign, there has been a remarkable increase in references to Hofstadter’s work. Some examples include, Max Boot, “How the ‘Stupid Party’ Created Donald Trump,” The New York Times, July 31, 2016, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/01/opinion/how-the-stupid-party-created-donald- trump.html; Paul Musgrove, “Donald Trump is Normalizing Paranoia and Conspiracy Thinking in U.S. Politics,” The Washington Post, January 12, 2017, https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2017/01/12/donald-trump-has- brought-us-the-american-style-in-paranoid-politics/?utm_term=.8a8f6cdca6cb; Bret Stephens, “The g.O.P. Bonfire of the Sanities,” The New York Times, January 26, 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/26/opinion/republicans-paranoia-mueller-trump.html
Load more

Recommended publications
  • By Philip Roth
    The Best of the 60s Articles March 1961 Writing American Fiction Philip Roth December 1961 Eichmann’s Victims and the Unheard Testimony Elie Weisel September 1961 Is New York City Ungovernable? Nathan Glazer May 1962 Yiddish: Past, Present, and Perfect By Lucy S. Dawidowicz August 1962 Edmund Wilson’s Civil War By Robert Penn Warren January 1963 Jewish & Other Nationalisms By H.R. Trevor-Roper February 1963 My Negro Problem—and Ours By Norman Podhoretz August 1964 The Civil Rights Act of 1964 By Alexander M. Bickel October 1964 On Becoming a Writer By Ralph Ellison November 1964 ‘I’m Sorry, Dear’ By Leslie H. Farber August 1965 American Catholicism after the Council By Michael Novak March 1966 Modes and Mutations: Quick Comments on the Modern American Novel By Norman Mailer May 1966 Young in the Thirties By Lionel Trilling November 1966 Koufax the Incomparable By Mordecai Richler June 1967 Jerusalem and Athens: Some Introductory Reflections By Leo Strauss November 1967 The American Left & Israel By Martin Peretz August 1968 Jewish Faith and the Holocaust: A Fragment By Emil L. Fackenheim October 1968 The New York Intellectuals: A Chronicle & a Critique By Irving Howe March 1961 Writing American Fiction By Philip Roth EVERAL winters back, while I was living in Chicago, the city was shocked and mystified by the death of two teenage girls. So far as I know the popu- lace is mystified still; as for the shock, Chicago is Chicago, and one week’s dismemberment fades into the next’s. The victims this particular year were sisters. They went off one December night to see an Elvis Presley movie, for the sixth or seventh time we are told, and never came home.
    [Show full text]
  • A Measure of Detachment: Richard Hofstadter and the Progressive Historians
    A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT: RICHARD HOFSTADTER AND THE PROGRESSIVE HISTORIANS A Thesis Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS By Wiliiam McGeehan May 2018 Thesis Approvals: Harvey Neptune, Department of History Andrew Isenberg, Department of History ABSTRACT This thesis argues that Richard Hofstadter's innovations in historical method arose as a critical response to the Progressive historians, particularly to Charles Beard. Hofstadter's first two books were demonstrations of the inadequacy of Progressive methodology, while his third book (the Age of Reform) showed the potential of his new way of writing history. i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................i CHAPTER 1. A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT..........................................................................1 2. SOCIAL DARWINISM IN AMERICAN THOUGHT………………………………………………26 3. THE AMERICAN POLITICAL TRADITION…………………………………………………………..52 4. THE AGE OF REFORM…………………………………………………………………………………….100 5. CONCLUSION…………………………………………………………………………………………………139 BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..144 CHAPTER ONE A MEASURE OF DETACHMENT Great thinkers often spend their early years in rebellion against the teachers from whom they have learned the most. Freud would say they live out a form of the Oedipal archetype, that son must murder his father at least a little bit if he is ever to become his own man.
    [Show full text]
  • © Copyrighted by Charles Ernest Davis
    SELECTED WORKS OF LITERATURE AND READABILITY Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Davis, Charles Ernest, 1933- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 00:54:12 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/288393 This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-5237 DAVIS, Charles Ernest, 1933- SELECTED WORKS OF LITERATURE AND READABILITY. University of Arizona, Ph.D., 1969 Education, theory and practice University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan © COPYRIGHTED BY CHARLES ERNEST DAVIS 1970 iii SELECTED WORKS OF LITERATURE AND READABILITY by Charles Ernest Davis A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY .In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 9 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Charles Ernest Davis entitled Selected Works of Literature and Readability be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy PqulA 1- So- 6G Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:" *7-Mtf - 6 7-So IdL 7/3a This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination; The inclusion of this sheet bound into the library copy of the dissertation is evidence of satisfactory performance at the final examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Patriotism and Honor: Veterans of Dutchess County, New York
    Patriotism and Honor: Veterans of Dutchess County, New York Dutchess County Historical Society 2018 Yearbook • Volume 97 Candace J. Lewis, Editor Dutchess County Historical Society The Society is a not-for-profit educational organization that collects, preserves, and interprets the history of Dutchess County, New York, from the period of the arrival of the first Native Americans until the present day. Publications Committee: Candace J. Lewis, Ph.D., Editor David Dengel, Dennis Dengel, John Desmond, Roger Donway, Eileen Hayden, Julia Hotton, Bill Jeffway, Melodye Moore, and William P. Tatum III Ph.D. Designer: Marla Neville, Main Printing, Poughkeepsie, New York mymainprinter.com Printer: Advertisers Printing, Saint Louis, Missouri Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook 2018 Volume 97 • Published annually since 1915 Copyright © by Dutchess County Historical Society ISSN: 0739-8565 ISBN: 978-0-944733-13-4 Front Cover: Top: Young men of Dutchess County recently transformed into soldiers. On the steps of the Armory, Poughkeepsie, New York. 1917. Detail. Bottom: Men, women, and children walk along the railroad tracks in Poughkeepsie at lower Main Street, seeing off a contingent of soldiers as they entrain for war. 1918. Back Cover: Left: Nurses from around the country march in the parade of April 6, 1918. Detail. Middle: A “patriotic pageant,l” performed by children. April 1918. Right: Unidentified individual as he gets ready to “entrain” in the separate recruitment of African Americans. 1918, Detail. All Photographs by Reuben P. Van Vlack. Collection of the Dutchess County Historical Society. The Dutchess County Historical Society Yearbook does not assume responsibility for statements of fact or opinion made by the authors.
    [Show full text]
  • Under the Direction of Professor David A
    ABSTRACT MEDLIN, ERIC PATRICK. The Historian and the Liberal Intellectual: Power and Postwar American Historians, 1948-1975. (Under the direction of Professor David A. Zonderman.) Arthur Schlesinger, Jr., Richard Hofstadter, and Daniel Boorstin were three of the most influential American historians of the post-World War II period. They sold millions of books, influenced historiographic debates, and filled prominent positions in society and government. Schlesinger spent two years as a special adviser to President Kennedy, Hofstadter served on the board of the forerunner to PBS, and Boorstin became the first historian to be appointed Librarian of Congress. Over the past five decades, historians have characterized these writers as conservative academics who focused on consensus and agreement in American history. My work challenges that notion. In this thesis, I analyze the writings, speeches, and personal correspondence of Schlesinger, Hofstadter, and Boorstin between 1945 and 1975. My study focuses on both their political ideas and their roles in society. I look at how their work articulated different arguments for and ideas about liberalism during this period. I argue that their positions and roles in society changed in response to their ideas about what society needed from intellectuals. I also argue that the experiences and successes of these figures a provide a template for contemporary public intellectuals who desire both academic and public relevance. © Copyright 2017 by Eric Patrick Medlin All Rights Reserved The Historian and the Liberal Intellectual: Power and Postwar American Historians, 1948-1975 by Eric Patrick Medlin A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2017 APPROVED BY: ____________________________ ____________________________ Julia E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bio-Bibliographical Sketch of Max Shachtman
    The Lubitz' TrotskyanaNet Max Shachtman Bio-Bibliographical Sketch Contents: • Basic biographical data • Biographical sketch • Selective bibliography • Notes on archives Basic biographical data Name: Max Shachtman Other names (by-names, pseud. etc.): Cousin John * Marty Dworkin * M.S. * Max Marsh * Max * Michaels * Pedro * S. * Max Schachtman * Sh * Maks Shakhtman * S-n * Tr * Trent * M.N. Trent Date and place of birth: September 10, 1904, Warsaw (Russia [Poland]) Date and place of death: November 4, 1972, Floral Park, NY (USA) Nationality: Russian, American Occupations, careers, etc.: Editor, writer, party leader Time of activity in Trotskyist movement: 1928 - ca. 1948 Biographical sketch Max Shachtman was a renowned writer, editor, polemicist and agitator who, together with James P. Cannon and Martin Abern, in 1928/29 founded the Trotskyist movement in the United States and for some 12 years func­ tioned as one of its main leaders and chief theoreticians. He was a close collaborator of Leon Trotsky and translated some of his major works. Nicknamed Trotsky's commissar for foreign affairs, he held key positions in the leading bodies of Trotsky's international movement before, in 1940, he split from the Socialist Workers Party (SWP), founded the Workers Party (WP) and in 1948 definitively dissociated from the Fourth International. Shachtman's name was closely webbed with the theory of bureaucratic collectivism and with what was described as Third Campism ('Neither Washington nor Moscow'). His thought had some lasting influence on a consider­ able number of contemporaneous intellectuals, writers, and socialist youth, both American and abroad. Once a key figure in the history and struggles of the American and international Trotskyist movement, Shachtman, from the late 1940s to his death in 1972, made a remarkable journey from the left margin of American society to the right, thus having been an inspirer of both Anti-Stalinist Marxists and of neo-conservative hard-liners.
    [Show full text]
  • Porcellian Club Veterans
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC H PORCELLIAN CLUB MEMBER VETERANS As a result of their military service, Crimson warriors became part of a “Band of Brothers”. The following is an illustrative but not exhaustive listing of military oriented biographies of veterans whose initial exposure to non-family “brotherhood” were as members of various social and final clubs as undergraduates at Harvard. CIVIL WAR - HARVARD COLLEGE BY CLASS 18 34 Major General Henry C. Wayne CSA Born in Georgia – Georgia Militia Infantry Henry was the son of a lawyer and US congressman from Georgia who was later appointed as justice to the US Supreme Court by President Andrew Jackson. He prepared at the Williston School in Northampton (MA) for Harvard where he was member of the Porcellian Club. In his junior year at Harvard, he received and accepted an appointment to West Point where he graduated 14th out of 45 in 1838. Among his class mates at West Point were future flag officers: Major General Irvin McDowell USA who was defeated at the 1st battle of Bull Run, General P.G.T. Beauregard CSA who was the victor at the1st battle of Bull Run as well as numerous other major Civil War engagements and Lt. General William J. Hardee CSA who served in both Mexican War and throughput the Civil War. After West Point, Henry was commissioned as a 2nd LT and served for 3 years with the 4th US Artillery on the frontiers border of NY and ME during a border dispute with Canada. He then taught artillery and cavalry tactics at West Point for 5 years before joining General Winfield Scott’s column from Vera Cruz to Mexico City during in the Mexican War.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Events
    CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ll quotes are from Spectator, Columbia’s student-run newspaper, unless otherwise specifed. http://spectatorarchive.library.columbia A .edu/. Some details that follow are from Up Against the Ivy Wall, edited by Jerry Avorn et al. (New York: Atheneum, 1969). SEPTEMBER 1966 “After a delay of nearly seven years, the new Columbia Community Gymnasium in Morningside Park is due to become a reality. Ground- breaking ceremonies for the $9 million edifice will be held early next month.” Two weeks later it is reported that there is a delay “until early 1967.” OCTOBER 1966 Tenants in a Columbia-owned residence organize “to protest living condi- tions in the building.” One resident “charged yesterday that there had been no hot water and no steam ‘for some weeks.’ She said, too, that Columbia had ofered tenants $50 to $75 to relocate.” A new student magazine—“a forum for the war on Vietnam”—is pub- lished. Te frst issue of Gadfy, edited by Paul Rockwell, “will concentrate on the convictions of three servicemen who refused to go to Vietnam.” This content downloaded from 129.236.209.133 on Tue, 10 Apr 2018 20:25:33 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms LII CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS Te Columbia chapter of Students for a Democratic Society (SDS) orga- nizes a series of workshops “to analyze and change the social injustices which it feels exist in American society,” while the Independent Commit- tee on Vietnam, another student group, votes “to expand and intensify its dissent against the war in Vietnam.” A collection of Columbia faculty, led by Professor Immanuel Wallerstein, form the Faculty Civil Rights Group “to study the prospects for the advancement of civil rights in the nation in the coming years.” NOVEMBER 1966 Columbia Chaplain John Cannon and ffeen undergraduates, including Ted Kaptchuk, embark upon a three-day fast in protest against the war in Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics Was Very Good
    A SHORT HISTORY OF OUR TIME di-lem'ma, 1 di-lem'a; 2 di-lëm'a, n. 1. A necessary choice between equally undesirable alternatives; a per­ plexing predicament. 2, Logic. A syllogistic argument which presents an antagonist with two (or more) alter­ natives, but is equally conclusive against him, whichever alternative he chooses. [ < Gr. dilèmma, < di-, two, + lèmma, anything taken.]—dil"em-mat'ic, a. 146 pacifism and the ussr-a discussion 150 battle of the churches in italy, by anton ciliga 155 the socialist labor party, by nathan dershowitz 159 european letter, by nicola chiaromonte 162 an american death camp, by harold orlansky 168 can we cure mental care? by elsie cronhimer 171 ancestors No. 6 - kurt tucholsky: (1) the man with the five pseudonyms, by hans sahl, (2) tucholsky's "testament", (3) herr wendriner under the dictatorship 178 the Wallace cam­ paign, an autopsy by dwight macdonald 189 commonnonsense, by niccolo tucci 189 remarks on the constitution of the mongolian people's republic, by theodore dryden 191 mr. sindlinger's option on the future, by harvey swados 194 amg in germany, by peter blake 202 the case of the dizzy dean at illinois university 203 on the elections, by dwight macdonald 206 report on packages-to-europe, by nancy macdonald 75c • No. 3,1948 Pacifism and the USSR A DISCUSSION Sir: tical disinterestedness which may at present enable you peacefully to withstand attacks by depraved, demented or May a recent reader comment briefly on what appears sadistic assailants, what would be your attitude if your to be an anomalous situation: the inclusion of the “ Peace­ wife and children were so threatened? Are you your makers” declaration, signed by the editor, in the very “brother’s keeper,” especially if he is your very own and issue devoted to “ USSR” — i.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservatism of Richard Hofstadter 45
    The Conservatism of Richard Hofstadter 45 The Conservatism of Richard Hofstadter Ryan Coates Third Year Undergraduate, Durham University ‘We have all been taught to regard it as more or less “natural” for young dissenters to become conservatives as they grow older.’ Richard Hofstadter So proved to be the case for the author of this statement, the outstanding American historian of the twentieth century, Richard Hofstadter (1916-70). This assertion challenges the dominant orthodox portrayal of Hofstadter as the iconic public intellectual of post-war American liberalism. The orthodox interpretation, supported by biographer David Brown and historians Arthur Schlesinger and Sean Wilentz, demonstrates Hofstadter’s ideological progression from thirties radical, briefly a member of the Communist Party, to fifties liberal credited as the founder of consensus history.1 This interpretation draws upon Hofstadter’s most political works, includingThe American Political Tradition and the Men Who Made It (1948), The Age of Reform (1955) and most prominently, the essays collected in The Paranoid Style in American Politics (1964), to reveal an apparent all-encompassing hostility toward conservatism. The revisionist interpretation, advanced by Hofstadter’s fellow New York intellectual Alfred Kazin and historians Robert Collins, Daniel Walker Howe and Peter Elliott Finn, challenges this one-dimensional portrayal of Hofstadter’s complex relationship to conservatism.2 Rather than flourishing into the iconic historian of American liberalism, the revisionists contend, Hofstadter’s intellectual development represented a gradual transition that had, by the end of his shortened life, culminated in a conversion to Burkean conservatism. Indeed, Kazin’s description of Hofstadter as a ‘secret conservative in a radical period’ encourages parallels 1 David S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vita for Alan M. Wald
    1 July 2016 VITA FOR ALAN M. WALD Emeritus Faculty as of June 2014 FORMERLY H. CHANDLER DAVIS COLLEGIATE PROFESSOR OF ENGLISH LITERATURE AND AMERICAN CULTURE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, ANN ARBOR Address Office: Prof. Alan Wald, English Department, University of Michigan, 3187 Angell Hall, Ann Arbor, Mi. 48109-1003. Home: 3633 Bradford Square Drive, Ann Arbor, Mi. 48103 Faxes can be received at 734-763-3128. E-mail: [email protected] Education B.A. Antioch College, 1969 (Literature) M.A. University of California at Berkeley, 1971 (English) Ph. D. University of California at Berkeley, 1974 (English) Occupational History Lecturer in English, San Jose State University, Fall 1974 Associate in English, University of California at Berkeley, Spring 1975 Assistant Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1975-81 Associate Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1981-86 Professor in the English Department and in the Program in American Culture at the University of Michigan, 1986- Director, Program in American Culture, University of Michigan, 2000-2003 H. Chandler Davis Collegiate Professor, University of Michigan, 2007-2014 Professor Emeritus, University of Michigan, 2014- Research and Teaching Specialties 20th Century United States Literature Realism, Naturalism, Modernism in Mid-20th Century U.S. Literature Literary Radicalism in the United States Marxism and U.S. Cultural Studies African American Writers on the Left Modernist Poetry and the Left The Thirties New York Jewish Writers and Intellectuals Twentieth Century History of Socialist, Communist, Trotskyist and New Left Movements in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • X************************************************** * Reproductions Supplied by EDRS Are the Best That Can Be Made *
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 312 276 TM 014 017 TITLE Sex and Race Differences on Standardized Tests. Oversight Hearings before the Subcommittee on Civil and Constitutiohal Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary. House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, First Session. INSTITUTION Congress of the U.S., Washington, D.C. House Committee on the Judiciary. PUB DATE 23 Apr 89 NOTE 309p.; Serial No. 93. Portions contain small/semi-legible print. AVAILABLE FROM Superintendent of Documents, Congressional Sales Ofice, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402. PUB TYPE Legal/Legislative/Regulatory Materials (090) Reports Research/Technical (143) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC13 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Academically Gifted; Admission (School); Classification; *College Entrance Examinations; Elementary Secondary Education; Equal Education; Equal Opportunities (Jobs); Females; Handicap Discrimination; Hearings; Higher Education; High Risk Students; Minority Groups; Occupational Tests; Politics of Education; *Racial Differences; *Sex Differences; *Standardized Tests; *Test Bias IDENTIFIERS Admissions Testing Program; Congress 100th; Educational Testing Service; *Scholastic Aptitude Test ABSTRACT The purpose of this 1-day hearing was to assess the level and effects of bias based on gender and race differences affecting standardized tests. The focus was on examining the role of standardized tests with respect to educational and employment opportunities for women and minorities. Testimony or statements from 14 witnesses are presented. Subjects addressed include the influence of test scores on entry into gifted programs, uses of the Scholastic Aptitude Test, the impact of standardized testing on children at risk, misclassification of minority students, testing of the handicapped, politics of testing, the Admissions Testing Program of the College Board, test fairness assurances, and the Educational Testing Service's sensitivity review process and its standards for quality and fairness.
    [Show full text]