The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Pseudo-Democrat's Dilemma: Why Election Observation Became an International Norm THE PSEUDO- DEMOCRAT’S DILEMMA THE PSEUDO- DEMOCRAT’S DILEMMA WHY ELECTION OBSERVATION BECAME AN INTERNATIONAL NORM Susan D. Hyde CORNELL UNIVERSITY PRESS ITHACA AND LONDON Cornell University Press gratefully acknowledges receipt of a grant from the Whitney and Betty MacMillan Center for International and Area Studies at Yale University, which helped in the publication of this book. The book was also published with the assistance of the Frederick W. Hilles Publication Fund of Yale University. Copyright © 2011 by Cornell University All rights reserved. Except for brief quotations in a review, this book, or parts thereof, must not be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. For information, address Cornell University Press, Sage House, 512 East State Street, Ithaca, New York 14850. First published 2011 by Cornell University Press Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hyde, Susan D. The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma : why election observation became an international norm / Susan D. Hyde. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-8014-4966-6 (alk. paper) 1. Election monitoring. 2. Elections—Corrupt practices. 3. Democratization. 4. International relations. I. Title. JF1001.H93 2011 324.6'5—dc22 2010049865 Cornell University Press strives to use environmentally responsible suppliers and materials to the fullest extent possible in the publishing of its books. Such materials include vegetable-based, low-VOC inks and acid-free papers that are recycled, totally chlorine-free, or partly composed of nonwood fi bers. For further information, visit our website at www.cornellpress.cornell.edu. Cloth printing 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 To Howard Leichter, Dawn Nowacki, and Elliot Tenofsky, who introduced me to this profession, and David Lake, my mentor CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ix Acknowledgments xi Introduction 1 1 Signaling Democracy and the Norm of Internationally Observed Elections 28 2 Sovereign Leaders and the Decision to Invite Observers 56 3 Democracy-Contingent Benefits 89 4 Does Election Monitoring Matter? 126 5 The Quality of Monitoring and Strategic Manipulation 158 Conclusion: Constrained Leaders and Changing International Expectations 185 Appendixes A. Formalization of Signaling Game 211 B. Codebook 216 Selected Bibliography 225 Index 239 FIGURES AND TABLES Figures I.1. Internationally observed elections, 1960–2006 8 1.1. International observation, election manipulation, and probability of victory 43 2.1. Total number of elections per year, 1960–2006 66 2.2. Diffusion of elections and election observation by region 67 2.3. Regime type in observed elections vs. global average 70 2.4. Elections with pre-election concerns about fraud 71 2.5. Elections held by transitional government 72 2.6. Elections held following suspended elections 72 2.7. First multiparty elections 73 3.1. Changes in democracy-contingent benefi ts over time 94 3.2. Trends in observed elections and foreign aid to government and civil society 108 3.3. Percentage of bilateral offi cial development assistance devoted to democracy assistance 108 3.4. Negative reports, 1975–2005 112 3.5. Bilateral foreign aid to Haiti 118 3.6. Bilateral foreign aid to Togo 122 3.7. Noninviting countries, 2000–2006 123 4.1. Round one vote share for incumbent in monitored vs. unmonitored polling stations 142 x Figures and Tables 5.1. Average number of reported short-term observers per observed election, 1960–2004 167 5.2. Trends in international observation missions 171 Tables 2.1. Observed elections and Cold War alliances, 1962–1988 68 2.2. Observed elections and Cold War alliance patterns, 1989–1994 69 2.3. Binary logit, observed elections 77 2.4. Effects of country characteristics on the probability of inviting observers 80 2.5. Alternative explanations 83 4.1. Armenia round one observer coverage by region 139 4.2. Logistic regression of round two monitoring on background covariates 140 4.3. Effects of observations on vote share for President Robert Kocharian 141 4.4. Logistic regression of assigned-to-treatment group on registered voters 146 4.5. Carter Center observation coverage of villages in Indonesia 148 4.6. Summary statistics for all available village-level variables 149 4.7. Estimated effects of intent to treat on total votes for Megawati 151 4.8. Estimated effect of observers on total votes for Megawati in observed villages 153 5.1. Election manipulation and observer response 168 B.1. Descriptive statistics for table 2.3 221 B.2. Countries included in analysis 222 B.3. Excluded countries by reason for exclusion 223 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Although I did not know it at the time, this book began its life in the fall of 2001 as my fi rst research paper in graduate school. As a result, nearly everyone with whom I have come in professional contact has helped me write this book, and my debts are immense. I have been fortunate to re- ceive numerous sources of institutional support during the research, writ- ing, and rewriting. My research has been made possible by grants and fellowship from the Brookings Institution’s Governance Studies Program, the Institute for Global Confl ict and Cooperation (IGCC) of the Univer- sity of California, and the University of California, San Diego’s School of Social Sciences and Department of Political Science, the University of California’s Washington Center, George Washington University’s Insti- tute for Global and International Studies, Princeton University’s Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance, and the American Political Science Association’s Centennial Center. Yale University, including the Department of Political Science, the MacMillan Center, and the Insti- tution for Social and Policy Studies, provided generous research funds, opportunities to present my research, and most important, time to write. The Carter Center’s Democracy Program gave me numerous opportuni- ties to serve as an international election observer, invited me to spend a summer in their offi ces in Atlanta, and gave me the unique opportunity to work with the organization during the 2004 Indonesian elections, which is refl ected in this book. I received extraordinarily helpful advice at a “book bash” in February 2008, sponsored by Ken Scheve and the Leitner Program in International and Comparative Political Economy at Yale. For traveling to New Haven just for the workshop, I thank David Lake, Jon Pevehouse, Ken Schultz, and Duncan Snidal, all of whom read the entire manuscript and gave me extensive and exceptionally helpful comments, as did Sue Stokes, Bruce xii Acknowledgments Russett, Matt Winters, Nikolay Marinov, Ken Scheve, Karissa Cloward, and Jonathan Monten. I thank my editor at Cornell University Press, Roger Haydon, for his enthusiastic support and excellent comments throughout the process. The book was published with generous assistance from Yale’s MacMillan Cen- ter for International and Area Studies and the Frederick W. Hilles Publi- cation Fund of Yale University. At Yale, my colleague Nikolay Marinov deserves special thanks for many reasons, including working with me for the past fi ve years to produce the NELDA dataset, from which this book draws heavily. The research as- sistants on that project, particularly Shazan Jiwa, Mary Swartz, and Jerry Wei, deserve special thanks for their excellent work. I also thank my col- leagues Chris Blattman, Keith Darden, Alex Debs, Thad Dunning, Don Green, Greg Huber, Stathis Kalyvas, Pierre Landry, Ellen Lust, Jason Lyall, Nuno Monteiro, Susan Rose-Ackerman, Frances Rosenbluth, Bruce Russett, Nicholas Sambanis, Ian Shapiro, Susan Stokes, James Vreeland, and Jessica Weiss. During my year of leave from Yale, my cofellows at Niehaus, Arang Keshavarzian, Heather McKibben, Christina Schneider, Ben Shepherd, Branislav Slantchev, Camber Warren, and Matt Winters were extremely helpful. I also thank Larry Bartels, Sarah Bush, Rafaela Dancygier, Christina Davis, Kosuke Imai, Amaney Jamal, Bob Keohane, Helen Milner, Andy Moravcsik, and Grigore Pop-Eleches for their sup- port and comments on my research. At UCSD, Gary Cox, Kristian Gleditsch, Clark Gibson, Peter Goure- vitch, and Carlos Waisman played a crucial role in helping me start to think about this book. I also thank Karen Ferree, Miles Kahler, Mat McCubbins, Branislav Slantchev, and Phil Roeder, and my colleagues in international relations and comparative politics at UCSD, including Scott Bailey, Kyle Beardsley, Rob Brown, Barak Hoffman, Alejandra Rios-Cázares, Idean Salehyan, and Heather Smith. David Lake was my advisor and remains my mentor and my friend. I cannot thank him enough for all of his help, advice, comments, and support, and hope that I can someday do for someone what he has done for me. Emily Beaulieu, Carew Boulding, David Cunningham, Kathleen Cunningham, Irfan Nooruddin, and Elizabeth Saunders have endured all of the ups and downs with me and helped me work through every (im- portant and unimportant) detail. This project wouldn’t have been half as fun without them. I also thank Michael Barnett, Karisa Cloward, Suzanne Katzenstein, Judith Kelley, Sharon Lean, Tom Legler, Alberto Simpser, Jack Snyder, Zach Zwald, and my collaborators on other research projects: Mike Alvarez, Thad Hall, Emilie Hafner-Burton, and Angel O’Mahony. Acknowledgments xiii In addition, this book benefi ted from the advice, comments, and encour- agement from faculty and graduate students participating in a number of workshops and seminars. The project would not have come to fruition without the assistance of many members of the election observation community. Eric Bjornlund, David Carroll, David Pottie, and Avery Davis-Roberts deserve special thanks and have each had an enormous infl uence on my thinking on the subject. I also thank Glenn Cowan, Anders Erikson, Pat Merloe, Gerald Mitchell, Shelley McConnell, Jennifer McCoy, Vladimir Pran, and many others whom I cannot thank here. My parents and brothers have been a constant source of support. Annie helped me and this book along at a particularly crucial time.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Electoral Manipulation in Russia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Birkbeck Institutional Research Online Electoral Manipulation in Russia: the Development of a Political System EDWIN BACON Russia’s parliamentary election of December 2011 once more brought to global attention the role of electoral manipulation in that country’s political system. The methods of manipulation alleged in 2011 are familiar from earlier elections. Most notably, the regional elections of October 2009 resulted in an overwhelming victory for the ‘party of power’, United Russia, followed by a walk-out from the State Duma by the three other parliamentary parties, in protest at fraud and electoral manipulation. Multi-layered questions surround the role of electoral manipulation in Russia’s political system. Why would a regime which apparently still enjoys substantial popular support engage in electoral manipulation? In electorally authoritarian states elections constitute the central element of legitimacy. Although electoral manipulation helps secure power, it reduces legitimacy. The trade-off between legitimacy and power plays out in other levels too. The opacity of Russia’s political system obfuscates the behavioural drivers of other players. Regional leaders formally owe their positions to the President. If they feel obliged to deliver the correct electoral results, there is less clarity on what those results are, especially with the ‘tandem’ leadership of Medvedev and Putin sending out mixed signals on the nature of democracy in Russia. Opposition parties must weigh up the benefits of participating in flawed elections. The distinction between outright opposition, and ‘within regime’ semi-opposition again obfuscates. Participation in elections provides opposition with the opportunity to de-legimitise the regime, by highlighting electoral manipulation.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Change in Dominica, the Commonwealth West Indies. Cuthbert J
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1973 From crown colony to associate statehood : political change in Dominica, the Commonwealth West Indies. Cuthbert J. Thomas University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Thomas, Cuthbert J., "From crown colony to associate statehood : political change in Dominica, the Commonwealth West Indies." (1973). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1879. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1879 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ^^^^^^^ ^0 ASSOCIATE STATEHOOD: CHANGE POLITICAL IN DOMINICA, THE COMMONWEALTH WEST INDIES A Dissertation Presented By CUTHBERT J. THOMAS Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 1973 Major Subject Political Science C\ithbert J. Thomas 1973 All Rights Reserved FROM CROV/N COLONY TO ASSOCIATE STATEHOOD: POLITICAL CHANGE IN DOMINICA, THE COMMONWEALTH WEST INDIES A Dissertation By CUTHBERT J. THOMAS Approved as to stylq and content by; Dr. Harvey "T. Kline (Chairman of Committee) Dr. Glen Gorden (Head of Department) Dr» Gerard Braunthal^ (Member) C 1 Dro George E. Urch (Member) May 1973 To the Youth of Dominica who wi3.1 replace these colonials before long PREFACE My interest in Comparative Government dates back to ray days at McMaster University during the 1969-1970 academic year.
    [Show full text]
  • Zambia General Elections
    Report of the Commonwealth Observer Group ZAMBIA GENERAL ELECTIONS 20 September 2011 COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT Table of Contents Chapter 1 ................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference ....................................................................................... 1 Activities ....................................................................................................... 1 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................... 3 POLITICAL BACKGROUND ....................................................................... 3 Early History ................................................................................................. 3 Colonial History of Zambia ............................................................................. 3 Post-Independence Politics ............................................................................ 3 2001 General Elections .................................................................................. 4 2006 General Elections .................................................................................. 5 The 2008 Presidential By-Election ................................................................... 5 Other Developments ...................................................................................... 5 Constitutional Review ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Steal an Election Tuesdays/Thursdays 11:00
    University of California, San Diego Fall Quarter, 2013 POLI 138D: How to Steal an Election Tuesdays/Thursdays 11:00 – 12:20 Robinson Building Complex (IRPS) 3202 Professor Clark Gibson Office: Social Science Building 386 Telephone: 822-5140 E-Mail: [email protected] Office Hours: Monday 8:30-9:30 a.m. Other times to meet can be arranged upon request. Overview: This course seeks to introduce students to the politics of electoral fraud in the contemporary world. It covers topics such as the logic of elections in authoritarian states, vote buying, electoral violence, institutional design and rigging, and election monitoring. The Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Somoza once said to his electoral opponent who claimed to have defeated him at the polls: ‘‘You may have won the voting, but I won the counting.’’ Course Requirements and Grading: The course will have a midterm (30%), final (30%), reading quizzes (30%), and in-class discussion (10%) - Exams will be comprised mainly of short answers. - Reading Quizzes occur frequently. Read the assignment before the day on which they are to be discussed. You may drop two quizzes without reason – use this power judiciously. There are no make-up quizzes. - Discussion is graded on your command of the reading material and your presentation of ideas. Nota Bene: This course focuses heavily on in-class activities. If you prefer courses which require less attendance and allow you to “catch up” with the readings, do not take this course. POLI 138D Schedule of Topics and Reading Assignments October 1 Susan Hyde - Table 12-1 “Examples of Unambiguous Signs of Election Manipulation” and Table 12-2 “Examples of Election Irregularities When Intention to Manipulate is Unclear” in R.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality∗
    Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality∗ Herbert Gintis Department of Economics University of Massachusetts, Amherst Phone: 413-586-7756 Fax: 413-586-6014 Email: [email protected] Web: http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/˜gintis Running Head: Strong Reciprocity and Human Sociality March 11, 2000 Abstract Human groups maintain a high level of sociality despite a low level of relatedness among group members. The behavioral basis of this sociality remains in doubt. This paper reviews the evidence for an empirically identifi- able form of prosocial behavior in humans, which we call ‘strong reciprocity,’ that may in part explain human sociality. A strong reciprocator is predisposed to cooperate with others and punish non-cooperators, even when this behavior cannot be justified in terms of extended kinship or reciprocal altruism. We present a simple model, stylized but plausible, of the evolutionary emergence of strong reciprocity. 1 Introduction Human groups maintain a high level of sociality despite a low level of relatedness among group members. Three types of explanation have been offered for this phe- nomenon: reciprocal altruism (Trivers 1971, Axelrod and Hamilton 1981), cultural group selection (Cavalli-Sforza and Feldman 1981, Boyd and Richerson 1985) and genetically-based altruism (Lumsden and Wilson 1981, Simon 1993, Wilson and Dugatkin 1997). These approaches are of course not incompatible. Reciprocal ∗ I would like to thank Lee Alan Dugatkin, Ernst Fehr, David Sloan Wilson, and the referees of this Journal for helpful comments, Samuel Bowles and Robert Boyd for many extended discussions of these issues, and the MacArthur Foundation for financial support. This paper is dedicated to the memory of W.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizen Orientations Toward Democracy Across These Same Nations
    CSD Center for the Study of Democracy An Organized Research Unit University of California, Irvine www.democ.uci.edu Democratic Aspirations and Democratic Ideals 1 Russell J. Dalton Center for the Study of Democracy University of California, Irvine Doh Chull Shin Department of Political Science University of Missouri February 2004 1 Paper presented for presentation at the conference on "Citizens, Democracy and Markets around the Pacific Rim," East West Center, Honolulu, March 2004. Portions of this chapter are drawn from a paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on the Social Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 11-15, 2002. Our thanks to Ronald Inglehart and Hans-Dieter Klingemann for supporting our participation in the 2000-02 World Values Survey; Pham Minh Hac and Pham Thanh Nghi for collaborating on the Vietnamese WVS; and Nhu-Ngoc Ong, Dorothy Solinger, and William Zimmerman for their advice on this research. We also gratefully acknowledge the research support of the POSCO Fellowship Program at the East-West Center in Hawaii, and especially Dr. Choong Nam Kim. Democratic Aspirations and Democratic Ideals Democratization has transformed the world in the last half of the 20th century. Where once democracy seemed like a small island in a sea of authoritarian states, with an uncertain future, it now is proclaimed as the inevitable endpoint of human political evolution (Fukuyama 1992). Data from the Freedom House illustrate this development. In 1950, only 14.3% of the countries (and colonial units) in the world were democracies, which included 31% of the world’s population. In 1990, the Freedom House considered 46.1% of the nations in the world as democracies.
    [Show full text]
  • Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya
    Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Volume 8 | Issue 2 Article 1 Spring 2010 Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr Recommended Citation Edwin Odhiambo Abuya, Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections?, 8 Nw. J. Int'l Hum. Rts. 122 (2010). http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njihr/vol8/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Copyright 2010 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 8, Issue 2 (Spring 2010) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights Can African States Conduct Free and Fair Presidential Elections? Edwin Odhiambo Abuya* Asiyekubali kushindwa si msihindani.1 I. INTRODUCTION ¶1 Can African States hold free and fair elections? To put it another way, is it possible to conduct presidential elections in Africa that meet internationally recognized standards? These questions can be answered in the affirmative. However, in order to safeguard voting rights, specific reforms must be adopted and implemented on the ground. In keeping with international legal standards on democracy,2 the constitutions of many African states recognize the right to vote.3 This right is reflected in the fact that these states hold regular elections. The right to vote is fundamental in any democratic state, but an entitlement does not guarantee that right simply by providing for elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Egypt Presidential Election Observation Report
    EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT JULY 2014 This publication was produced by Democracy International, Inc., for the United States Agency for International Development through Cooperative Agreement No. 3263-A- 13-00002. Photographs in this report were taken by DI while conducting the mission. Democracy International, Inc. 7600 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 1010 Bethesda, MD 20814 Tel: +1.301.961.1660 www.democracyinternational.com EGYPT PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT July 2014 Disclaimer This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the responsibility of Democracy International, Inc. and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government. CONTENTS CONTENTS ................................................................ 4 MAP OF EGYPT .......................................................... I ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................. II DELEGATION MEMBERS ......................................... V ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ....................... X EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.............................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................ 6 ABOUT DI .......................................................... 6 ABOUT THE MISSION ....................................... 7 METHODOLOGY .............................................. 8 BACKGROUND ........................................................ 10 TUMULT
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Proceedings
    Second International Meeting on the Implementation of the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation Summary of Proceedings Organization of American States (OAS) Washington, D.C., November 14-15, 2007 This document reflects the opinions expressed by the international organizations that participated in the Second International Meeting on the Implementation of the Declaration of Principles for International Election Observation. Consequently, the views expressed are exclusively those of the international organizations named herein, and they do not necessarily represent the points of view or the opinions of the OAS, its organs, its staff members, or the OAS Member States. Table of Contents I. Executive Summary II. Proceedings of the Meeting • Panel 1: Sharing Best Practices on Election Observation Criteria Andrew Bruce – Election Desk, External Relations Directorate General, European Commission David Pottie – Associate Director, Democracy Program, The Carter Center Gerardo Munck , Professor and Consultant, General Secretariat of the Organization of American States, Department for Electoral Cooperation and Observation External Discussant : Miriam Lapp , Acting Director, International Research and Cooperation, Elections Canada Moderator: Ms. Rumbidzai Kandawasvika-Nhundu (SADC-PF) • Panel 2: Harmonizing our Approaches to Electronic Technologies in Elections Domenico Tuccinardi – Senior Project Manager ACE Practitioners’ Network, International IDEA Avery Davis-Roberts – Program Associate, Democracy Program, The Carter Center Vladimir Pran – Chief of Party, WestBank/Gaza, IFES Moderator: Mr. Khabele Matlosa (EISA) • Panel 3: Post-Election Follow-up: Translating Observer Recommendations Into Action Robin Ludwig – Political Affairs Officer – United Nations Electoral Affairs Division (UNEAD) Mark Stevens – Advisor and Head, Democracy Section - Commonwealth Secretariat Pat Merloe – Senior Associate and Director of Election Programs, NDI Kingsley Rodrigo – Secretary General, Asian Network for Free Elections (ANFREL) Moderator: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Education — Memories of the Past in the Present Caribbean Social Studies Curriculum: a View from Teacher Practice Issue Date: 2019-05-28
    Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/73692 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation. Author: Con Aguilar E.O. Title: Heritage education — Memories of the past in the present Caribbean social studies curriculum: a view from teacher practice Issue Date: 2019-05-28 Chapter 6: The presence of Wai’tu Kubuli in teaching history and heritage in Dominica 6.1 Introduction Figure 6.1: Workshop at the Salybia Primary School Kalinago Territory, Dominica, January 2016. During my stay in Dominica, I had the opportunity to organize a teachers’ workshop with the assistance of the indigenous people of the Kalinago Territory. Although the teachers interact with Kalinago culture on a daily basis, we decided to explore the teachers’ knowledge of indigenous heritage and to challenge them in activities where they could put their knowledge into practice. We then drew animals, plants, tools and objects that are found in daily life in the Kalinago Territory. Later on in the workshop, we asked teachers about the Kalinago names that were printed on their tag names. Teachers were able to recognize some of these Kalinago names, and sometimes even the stories behind them. In this simple way, we started our workshop on indigenous history and heritage — because sometimes the most useful and meaningful learning resources are the ones we can find in our everyday life. This case study took place in Dominica; the island is also known by its Kalinago name, Wai’tu Kubuli, which means “tall is her body.” The Kalinago Territory is the home of the Kalinago people.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Elections: Election Violence and Leader Tenure
    Surviving(Elections:(( Violence(and(Leader(Tenure1( ! Emilie!M.!Hafner.Burton! Associate!Professor!! School!of!International!Relations!and!Pacific!Studies! !University!of!California,!San!Diego! [email protected]! ! Susan!D.!Hyde! Associate!Professor! Department!of!Political!Science! Yale!University! [email protected]!! ! Ryan!S.!Jablonski! PhD!Candidate! Department!of!Political!Science! University!of!California,!San!Diego! [email protected]! ! Draft:!2/18/13! ! ( ( Abstract( This!article!examines!how!government.sponsored!election!violence!influences!the!ability!of! incumbent!leaders!to!win!elections!and!remain!in!power.!We!argue!that!election!violence!is! a!costly!tradeoff!for!governments.!When!used!in!the!pre.election!period,!up!to!and! including!election!day,!government.sponsored!election!violence!against!opposition! supporters,!candidates,!and!the!citizenry!increases!the!probability!that!opposition!political! parties!boycott!the!election!and!the!incumbent!wins.!Yet!pre.election!violence!also! increases!the!probability!of!mass!post.election!protests!by!the!opposition,!which!in!turn! raise!the!odds!that!the!incumbent!will!be!forced!to!make!political!concessions!in!the!post. election!period!by!stepping!down!or!holding!new!elections.!Violence!against!protesters! does!not!change!these!odds.!! ! 1!Replication!data!are!available!at!____.! ! ! Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1975026 “RWANDA;!‘CLIMATE!OF!REPRESSION’!AS!VOTING!CONCLUDES”! !“VENEZUELAN!ANALYSTS!PREDICT!INCREASED!REPRESSION!AS!CHAVEZ!SUPPORT!WANES”! !“TWO!KILLED,!SCORES!INJURED!AS!VIOLENCE!MARS!BANGLADESH!CAMPAIGN”!
    [Show full text]
  • Download (4MB)
    ARISTOTLE AND DEMOCRACY A PhD Thesis submitted by Charalambos Ioannou Papageorgiou k k k k University College University of London LONDON 1991 ** ProQuest Number: 10609803 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10609803 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 2 ABSTRACT The thesis undertakes a reconstruction and critical assessment of Aristotle's theory of democracy. The process of reconstruction requires at first the collection and organisation of the relevant material, since Aristotle's references to democracy, although numerous, are scattered throughout his political and ethical writings. A chapter is devoted to this task. This chapter also seeks to describe the historical and intellectual context in which Aristotle developed his ideas on democracy. The thesis then attempts to identify the fundamental principles which underlie Aristotle's conception of democracy. These are examined both in their relation to one another and also in their relation to the fundamental principles of Aristotle's political philosophy in general. Aristotle's teleological conception of the state and his theory of distributive justice based on proportionate equality are singled out as the salient principles which shape his conception, classification and criticism of democracy.
    [Show full text]