China's and US Diplomacy, Foreign Aid, Trade, and Investment in the Developing World
= 425&7.3,= 14'&1=3+1:*3(*a=-.3&8=&3)= __=.5142&(>`=47*.,3= .)`=!7&)*`=&3)= 3;*892*39=.3=9-*=*;*145.3,=$471)= -42&8= :2`= 447).3&947= 5*(.&1.89=.3= 8.&3= ++&.78= :,:89=+/`=,**2= 43,7*88.43&1= *8*&7(-=*7;.(*= 18/1**= <<<_(78_,4;= -.0,*= =*5479=+47=43,7*88 Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress 425&7.3,= 14'&1=3+1:*3(*= = :22&7>= This report compares the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) and U.S. projections of global influence, with an emphasis on non-coercive means or “soft power,” and suggests ways to think about U.S. foreign policy options in light of China’s emergence. Part One discusses U.S. foreign policy interests, China’s rising influence, and its implications for the United States. Part Two compares the global public images of the two countries and describes PRC and U.S. uses of soft power tools, such as public diplomacy, state diplomacy, and foreign assistance. It also examines other forms of soft power such as military diplomacy, global trade and investment, and sovereign wealth funds. In Part Three, the report analyzes PRC and U.S. diplomatic and economic activities in five developing regions—Southeast Asia, Central Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America. China and the United States use tools of soft power in different ways and with varying effects. Since the mid-1990s, the PRC has adopted an increasingly active and pragmatic diplomatic approach around the world that emphasizes complementary economic interests.
[Show full text]