A Keport Jor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Keport Jor II;rERANS AFFAI RS ' R E P UB l ~ C OF VIETNAM A Keport jor AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEi;lT OF 'STATE APRIL'i967 VETERANS AFFAIRS REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM I A Report for AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF STATE by RALPH T. CASTEEL and A.H. CORLEY, JR. VETERANS ADMINISTRATION ADVISORS TO USAID MISSION TO VIETNAM APRIL 1967 VETERANS ADMINISTRATION OFFICE OF THE ADMINISTRATOR OF VETERANS AFFAIRS WASHINGTON, D.C. 20420 April 28, 1967 Honorable William S. Gaud Administrator, Agency for International Development Department of State Washington, D. C. 20523 Dear Mr. Administrator: In response to your agency's request of September 19 and October 11, 1966 to the Administrator of Veterans Affairs, the undersigned were detailed to the A.I.D. Mission to Vietnam on October 21, 1966, to assist. in developing an overall plan in veterans' affairs suitable to Vietnam. We are pleased to transmit to you this report, thus completing our mission with your agency. The recommendations in this report have been reviewed with A.I.D. officials in both Saigon and Washington, and with key VA officials. Also, copies of an interim report containing the same recommendations were furnished the Public Administration Branch, Far East Bureau, A.I.D. on March 31, 1967. The recommendations presented in this report, however, are solely ours and are based on our "an-site" ap­ praisal and analysis of veterans' affairs in the Republic of Vietnam. The proposals presented are considered practical for implemen­ tation. The effect of these programs would, in our opinion, further U. S. policy in the Republic of Vietnam as well as provide for the individual member of the Armed Forces of that Nation a sense of security he does not currently possess. Further, it would express to ex-servicemen in a tang­ ible manner the gratitude of the Republic of Vietnam for their service in the Armed Forces. Ultimately, the new programs should assist in the im­ provement of the economy and strengthen the support and national feeling of this significant segment of the population toward the Nation and its Government. We appreciate the honor accorded us by the Administrator of Veterans Affairs in making our services available to your agency. The fine cooperation and assistance of your representatives in Vietnam and the working relationships developed with the Commissioner for War Veterans, Republic of Vietnam, contributed immeasurably to the accomplishment of our mission. Sincerely yours, CASTEEL A. H. CO Y, Jr. Member, Administrator's Director, Managemen Advisory Council Services Staff, Of of Management Engineer­ ing and Evaluation (VA Advisors to USAID Mission to Vietnam) cc: Chief, Public Adm. Branch iii TABLE 'OF CONTENTS Section - Page Forword ----- ----- vii I Scope of Present Benefits Provided Vietnamese Veterans by the Republic of Vietnam ------------------ 1 II Summary of Recommendations --------------------------- 7 III Priorities for Implementation of Recom- mendations ------------------------------------------- 11 IV Organization ----------------------------------------- 13 V Recommended Benefits for Vietnamese Veterans, their Dependents and Beneficiaries ------------------------- 17 A. Medical --------------------------------------- 7 B. Vocational Training ---------------------------- 19 C. Small Business Loans --------------------------- - 21 D. Term Insurance --------------- ----------------- 23 E. Education Allowances --------------------------- 25 F. Burial Allowance ------------------------------- 27 G. Veterans Preference - Land Reform -------------- 28 H. Job Placement ------- -------------------------- 30 I. GVN Policy ------------------------------------- 31 VI Recommended Changes in Existing Vietnamese Veterans' Benefits and Programs -------------------------------- 33 A. Scholarships - Leadership Training ------------- 33 B. Revision of Present Pensions and Benefits Programs------------------------------------ 34 C. Abolishment of Homes for Invalids ------------ 36 V TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONT'D.) Section Page VII Budget ------------------------------------------ 39 VIII Administration -------------------------------------- 43 A. Benefits Law ---------------------------------- 43 B. Propaganda Program ---------- 43 C. Rating of Disabilities ----------------------- 44 D. Simplification of RVNAF Pay and Allowances System -.- - -------------------- 45 E. Transfer of Responsibility for Wards of the Nation Schools -------------------------------- 47 F. Transfer of Responsibility for Job Placement - 48 IX Vietnamese Veterans Legion -------------------------- 51 X Participating Agency Service Agreement -------------- 55 XI Appendices --------------------------------------- XII Charts and Tables --------------------------------- 59 XIII Exhibits ------------------------------------------- 61 XIV Glossary of Terms and Abbreviations ----------------- 63 vi FOREWORD The Agency for International Development, Depattment'lof State, Wash­ ington, D. C. requested the detail of two (2) Veterans Administration employees to AID's mission to the Republic of Vietnam. The Administrator of Veterans-Affairs made available the services of Ralph T. Casteel, member of the Administrator's Advisory Council, and Augustus H. Corley, Jr., Director, Management Services Staff, Office of Management Engineering and Evaluation. Their services were on a reimburs­ able detail as personal representatives of the Administrator, and as advi­ sors to the AID.Mission, Vietnam. The mission of these advisors was to furnish assistance to AID in the formulation and development of both short and long-range programs for the rehabilitation of Vietnamese veterans. The purpose of the mission was two­ fold: a. To develop veterans' benefit programs that would instill in members of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Vietnam a sense of security and thus give them more incentive to become efficient and effective members of the Armed Forces. b. To provide benefits to the extent economically feasible for veterans and their beneficiaries which would express in a tangible manner the gratitude of the Republic of Vietnam to those who fought for freedom and to the families of the vii men who gave their lives in the defense of their country. The advisors departed Washington, D. C. on October 21, 1966, arriv­ ing in Saigon on October 24, 1966. Upon arrival Messrs. James J. Mott and Pablo Mat. Guinto of the Public Administration Division, USAID, Viet­ nam, were assigned to work with the advisors while on duty in Southeast Asia. In the course of accomplishing the mission in the Republic of Viet­ nam, visits were made to Thailand, Taiwan and the Republic of the Philip­ pines to obtain first-hand knowledge of veterans' problems, programs and organizations. Within the Republic of Vietnam each of the four corps and regional headquarters were visited (Exhibit I). During these visits dis­ cussions were held with Vietnamese and American officials and military personnel as well as local officials of the Vietnamese Veterans Legion (Appendix A). These discussions were fruitful in learning how effective the present programs of the Commissariat for War Veterans were as well as to gain "grass root" ideas of the need for additional programs. Throughout the detail the advisors made every effort to become acquainted with the day-to-day operational problems within the Commis­ sariat for War Veterans and to give immediate remedial assistance in any specific area desired by the Commissioner. The approach used in the accomplishment of the mission included (a) an up-to-date appraisal of the present programs for veterans, (b) development and review with the Commissioner for War Veterans of new programs and their feasibility and (c) suggested priorities for implementation of new programs. In consider­ ing the feasibility of new programs, the advisors attempted to approach it in relation to U. S. policies and goals in the Republic of Vietnam viii including their estimated economic impact and effect upon U. S. advisor participation. The probable economic impact of the recommended programs has been most difficult to assess in specific instances for.lack of valid data on which to base a cost estimate. Pursuant to the request of the Assistant Director for Public Admin­ istration and the Associate Director for Development, USAID, Vietnam, a tentative report of findings and recommendations was submitted on Febru­ ary 6, 1967. Many of the recommendations were discussed with the Asso­ ciate Director for Development and the entire report was discussed with the Assistant Director for Public Administration. In addition most, if not all, of the recommendations were discussed with Nguyen Tan Hong, M. D., Commissioner for War Veterans, Republic of Vietnam. Due to the limited time Dr. Hong was able to personally discuss these matters with the advisors, some of the proposed programs were discussed in much more detail than others. The advisors' impressions, however, were that, in general, he approved of the programs and recommendations. In addition to the advisors' mission with USAID, Vietnam, much time was spent with officials of the Vietnamese Veterans Legion at the national, corps and province level to learn as much as possible about their endeavors in behalf of veterans, widows and orphans and to give them any assistance and encouragement possible. With good leadership, motivated to strengthen democratic principles within the Republic of Vietnam, the Vietnamese Veterans Legion could play an important role in furthering the national interests
Recommended publications
  • Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts Viet Nam Country Report
    Evaluation Department Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts Viet Nam Country Report Report 6/2011 – Study SADEV SWEDISH AGENCY FOR DEVELOPMENT EVALUATION Norad Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation P.O.Box 8034 Dep, NO-0030 Oslo Ruseløkkveien 26, Oslo, Norway Phone: +47 22 24 20 30 Fax: +47 22 24 20 31 Photo: Ken Opprann Design: Agendum See Design Print: 07 Xpress AS, Oslo ISBN: 978-82-7548-602-6 Joint Evaluation of Support to Anti-Corruption Efforts Viet Nam Country Report June 2011 Submitted by ITAD in association with LDP Responsibility for the contents and presentation of findings and recommendations rest with the evaluation team. The views and opinions expressed in the report do not necessarily correspond with those of Norad. Preface Donor agencies have increasingly included the fight against corruption in their over- all governance agenda. In preparation for this evaluation, a literature review1 was undertaken which showed that our support for anti-corruption work has sometimes had disappointing results. Has the donors’ approach to anti-corruption work been adapted to circumstances in the countries? What are the results of support for combating different types of cor- ruption, including forms that affect poor people and women in particular? These were some of the overarching questions that this evaluation sought to answer. The evaluation provides insights for the debate, drawing on recent evidence from five countries. The main conclusions and recommendations are presented in the synthesis report. In addition, separate reports have been prepared for each of the case countries Bangladesh, Nicaragua, Tanzania, Viet Nam and Zambia.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligence Memorandum
    Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 ,E .._, ....,, TolLSect:ef: -1L_____ -------' 3.5(c) DIRECTORATE OF INTELLIGENCE Intelligence Memorandum CAMBODIAANDTHE VIETNAMESE COMMUNISTS ... 3.5(c) 3.5(c) 29 January 1968 I Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 Approved for Release: 2018/07/26 C02962544 3.5(c) CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY Directorate of Intelligence 29 January 1968 INTELLIGENCE MEMORANDUM Cambodia and the Vietnamese Communists A Monthly Report Contents I. Military Developments: Communist battal~ ion and regimental size units continue to operate in Cambodian territory (Paras. 1-5). It is clear that North Vietnamese forces have had bases in the Cam­ bodian salient since mid-1965 (Paras. 6-8). The salient, however, has never been one of the major Communist base areias .in Cambodia (Paras. 9-12). A 3.3(h)(2) Cambodian~-----~ reports Communist units in South Vietnam are receiving Chinese arms and ammuni­ tion from Cambodian stocks (Paras. 13--16) . More reports have been received on Cambodian rice sales to the Corru:nunists (Paras. 17-20). Cambodian smug­ glers are supplying explosive chemicals to the Viet Cong (Para. 21). II. Poli ti cal Developments: Sihanouk"' con­ cerned over possible allied action against Communists in Cambodia for sanctuary, has reverted to diplomacy to settle the cris:is (Paras. 22-27). Sihanouk has again attempted to get a satisfactory border declara­ tion from the US (Para. 28). Cambodia, still believ­ ing the Communists will prevail in South Vietnam, sees short-term advantages to an opening to the West (Para.
    [Show full text]
  • The Vietnam War
    Fact Sheet 1: Introduction- the Vietnam War Between June 1964 and December 1972 around 3500 New Zealand service personnel served in South Vietnam. Unlike the First and Second World Wars New Zealand’s contribution in terms of personnel was not huge. At its peak in 1968 the New Zealand force only numbered 543. Thirty-seven died while on active service and 187 were wounded. The Vietnam War – sometimes referred to as the Second Indochina War – lasted from 1959 to 1975. In Vietnam it is referred to as the American War. It was fought between the communist Democratic Republic of Vietnam (North Vietnam) and its allies, and the US-supported Republic of Vietnam in the south. It ended with the defeat of South Vietnam in April 1975. Nearly 1.5 million military personnel were killed in the war, and it is estimated that up to 2 million civilians also died. This was the first war in which New Zealand did not fight with its traditional ally, Great Britain. Our participation reflected this country’s increasingly strong defence ties with the United States and Australia. New Zealand’s involvement in Vietnam was highly controversial and attracted protest and condemnation at home and abroad. A study of New Zealand’s involvement in the Vietnam War raises a number of issues. As a historical study we want to find out what happened, why it happened and how it affected people’s lives. This war meant different things to different people. The Vietnam War was, and still is, an important part of the lives of many New Zealanders.
    [Show full text]
  • Air America in South Vietnam I – from the Days of CAT to 1969
    Air America in South Vietnam I From the days of CAT to 1969 by Dr. Joe F. Leeker First published on 11 August 2008, last updated on 24 August 2015 I) At the times of CAT Since early 1951, a CAT C-47, mostly flown by James B. McGovern, was permanently based at Saigon1 to transport supplies within Vietnam for the US Special Technical and Economic Mission, and during the early fifties, American military and economic assistance to Indochina even increased. “In the fall of 1951, CAT did obtain a contract to fly in support of the Economic Aid Mission in FIC [= French Indochina]. McGovern was assigned to this duty from September 1951 to April 1953. He flew a C-47 (B-813 in the beginning) throughout FIC: Saigon, Hanoi, Phnom Penh, Vientiane, Nhatrang, Haiphong, etc., averaging about 75 hours a month. This was almost entirely overt flying.”2 CAT’s next operations in Vietnam were Squaw I and Squaw II, the missions flown out of Hanoi in support of the French garrison at Dien Bien Phu in 1953/4, using USAF C-119s painted in the colors of the French Air Force; but they are described in the file “Working in Remote Countries: CAT in New Zealand, Thailand-Burma, French Indochina, Guatemala, and Indonesia”. Between mid-May and mid-August 54, the CAT C-119s continued dropping supplies to isolated French outposts and landed loads throughout Vietnam. When the Communists incited riots throughout the country, CAT flew ammunition and other supplies from Hanoi to Saigon, and brought in tear gas from Okinawa in August.3 Between 12 and 14 June 54, CAT captain
    [Show full text]
  • China Versus Vietnam: an Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo
    A CNA Occasional Paper China versus Vietnam: An Analysis of the Competing Claims in the South China Sea Raul (Pete) Pedrozo With a Foreword by CNA Senior Fellow Michael McDevitt August 2014 Unlimited distribution Distribution unlimited. for public release This document contains the best opinion of the authors at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor. Cover Photo: South China Sea Claims and Agreements. Source: U.S. Department of Defense’s Annual Report on China to Congress, 2012. Distribution Distribution unlimited. Specific authority contracting number: E13PC00009. Copyright © 2014 CNA This work was created in the performance of Contract Number 2013-9114. Any copyright in this work is subject to the Government's Unlimited Rights license as defined in FAR 52-227.14. The reproduction of this work for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited. Nongovernmental users may copy and distribute this document in any medium, either commercially or noncommercially, provided that this copyright notice is reproduced in all copies. Nongovernmental users may not use technical measures to obstruct or control the reading or further copying of the copies they make or distribute. Nongovernmental users may not accept compensation of any manner in exchange for copies. All other rights reserved. This project was made possible by a generous grant from the Smith Richardson Foundation Approved by: August 2014 Ken E. Gause, Director International Affairs Group Center for Strategic Studies Copyright © 2014 CNA FOREWORD This legal analysis was commissioned as part of a project entitled, “U.S. policy options in the South China Sea.” The objective in asking experienced U.S international lawyers, such as Captain Raul “Pete” Pedrozo, USN, Judge Advocate Corps (ret.),1 the author of this analysis, is to provide U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnamese Cultural Profile
    Vietnamese Cultural Profile An Initiative of Qld Partners In Culturally Appropriate Care March 2009 Published 2009 by: Diversicare PO Box 5199 WEST END Q 4101 Ph 07 3846 1099 Vietnamese Cultural Profile Thanks are given to the following people: Margaret Hess, Director, Diversicare Elizabeth Zajac, Project Officer, PICAC Hedrika Johnson Huong Kim Chau Bai ... and to all those people who have provided comment about this cultural profile. Editor: Carly Goldman Disclaimer This cultural profile is a synthesis of information from a range of sources believed to be reliable. Diversicare gives no guarantee that the said base sources are correct, and accepts no responsibility for any resultant errors contained herein or for decision and actions taken as a result and any damage. Please note there may be costs associated with some of the resources and services listed in this directory. This cultural profile received funding assistance from the Australian Government Department of Health & Ageing under the Partners In Culturally Appropriate Care Initiative, and the Queensland Government and the Australian Government under the Home And Community Care Program. Vietnamese Cultural Profile Introduction 3 Background 4 Migration Experience 4 Australian Statistics 5 Customs in Everyday Life 6 Family 9 Family Structure 9 Attitudes to Residential Care 10 Personal Hygiene 11 Bathing 11 Grooming 11 Pensions 12 Leisure and Recreation 13 Daily Routine 13 Social Groups 13 Television 14 Movies 14 Radio 14 Newspapers and Books 15 Religion 16 Important Days 16 Food and Diet 18 Meals 18 Food Sources 21 Health 22 Trauma Situations 22 Attitudes to Illness and Pain 21 Perception of Health Professionals 23 Death and Dying 24 Palliative Care 24 Death 24 Language 25 Sample Communication Card 26 Language Additional Resources 27 Bibliography 28 Correction / Addition Form 29 Introduction This profile of the Vietnamese cultural community is one of the many projects undertaken by the Queensland Partners in Culturally Appropriate Care (PICAC).
    [Show full text]
  • US-Vietnam Relations in 2013
    U.S.-Vietnam Relations in 2013: Current Issues and Implications for U.S. Policy Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs June 19, 2013 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40208 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress U.S.-Vietnam Relations in 2013: Current Issues and Implications for U.S. Policy Summary After communist North Vietnam’s victory over U.S.-backed South Vietnam in 1975, the United States and Vietnam had minimal relations until the mid-1990s. Since the establishment of diplomatic relations in 1995, overlapping security and economic interests have led the two sides to expand relations across a wide range of issue-areas and begin to form a strategic partnership of sorts. Perhaps most prominently, in 2010, the two countries mobilized a multinational response to China’s perceived attempts to boost its claims to disputed waters and islands in the South China Sea. This coordinated effort to promote the freedom of navigation has continued. U.S. Interests In the United States, voices favoring improved relations have included those reflecting U.S. business interests in Vietnam’s growing economy and U.S. strategic interests in expanding cooperation with a populous country—Vietnam has over 90 million people—that has an ambivalent relationship with China and that is asserting itself on the regional stage. Others argue that improvements in bilateral relations should be conditioned upon Vietnam’s authoritarian government improving its record on human rights. The population of more than 1 million Vietnamese-Americans, as well as legacies of the Vietnam War, also drive continued U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • South Vietnam
    SOUTH VIETNAM Polity5 regime codes: fac scode polity pers bmon bday byear emon eday eyear exrec exconst polcomp 1X RVN -3 8 10 26 1955 11 1 1963 3 3 6 1Xa RVN -3 2 11 2 1963 6 11 1965 4 1 6 1Xb RVN -66 8 6 12 1965 3 29 1973 -66 -66 -66 1Xc RVN -77 3 3 30 1973 12 31 1975 -77 -77 -77 PITF Problem Events: 1) 01/58-04/75 (REV 01/58-04/75; GEN 01/65-04/75) 1X) Date of Change to Factional-Autocratic: October 26, 1955 (independence) Brief Explanation of Change To: The nationalist resistance to French occupation eventually led to a settlement through the Geneva Accords between the French government and Viet Minh representatives. According to the agreement, the country was divided between communist (north) and non-communist (south), led by Ngo Dinh Diem. The agreement also called for an election to be held by July 1956 to bring the two provisional zones under a unified government. However, the South Vietnamese Government refused to accept this provision and, on October 26, 1955, South Vietnam declared itself the Republic of Vietnam. In attempts to consolidate his power, Diem eliminated pro-French elements in the military and suppressed the local autonomy of other religious and political groups. Diem removed Bao Dai as chief of state and made himself president of the Republic in a government-manipulated referendum in October 1955. The Government scheduled general elections for a Constituent Assembly to be held on March 4, 1956. Diem, however, barred communist sympathizers from participating in the elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Media on Vietnam War
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI Pedagogická fakulta Katedra anglického jazyka HANA ČIHÁNKOVÁ III. ročník – prezenční studium Obor: Anglický jazyk se zaměřením na vzdělávání - Společenské vědy se zaměřením na vzdělávání INFLUENCE OF MEDIA ON VIETNAM WAR Bakalářská práce Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Světlana Obenausová, MLitt, Ph.D OLOMOUC 2014 1 Prohlašuji, že jsem bakalářskou práci vypracoval samostatně a použil pouze uvedených pramenů a literatury. V Olomouci dne 22. 4. 2014 . Hana Čihánková 2 I would like to thank PhDr. Světlana Obenausová, MLitt, Ph.D. for her tireless support throughout the writing process. 3 Content List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................ 5 Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 7 1 Vietnam War ....................................................................................................................... 8 2 Development of media ...................................................................................................... 10 3 Early Years ........................................................................................................................ 13 3.1 The Kennedy Administration .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • U.S.-Vietnam Relations: Background and Issues for Congress
    Order Code RL33316 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web U.S.-Vietnam Relations: Background and Issues for Congress Updated June 30, 2006 Mark E. Manyin Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress U.S.-Vietnam Relations: Background and Issues for Congress Summary After communist North Vietnam’s victory over U.S.-backed South Vietnam in 1975, U.S.-Vietnam relations remained essentially frozen for over 15 years. Since then, bilateral ties have expanded remarkably, to the point where the relationship in many ways has been virtually normalized. Congress has played a significant role in this process. Each step in improving bilateral ties has brought controversy, albeit at diminishing levels. Some argue that improvements in bilateral relations should be conditioned upon Hanoi improving its record on human and religious rights, particularly in the Central Highlands region. Opposition to the pace and scope of normalization also has come from groups arguing that Vietnam has not done enough to account for U.S. Prisoners of War/Missing in Action from the Vietnam War, though this argument has diminished markedly in recent years. Interests favoring normalization have included those reflecting a strong U.S. business interest in Vietnam’s reforming economy and American strategic interests in integrating Vietnam more fully into East Asia and in expanding cooperation with a country that has an ambivalent relationship with China. The most important step toward normalization over the past decade was the signing of a sweeping bilateral trade agreement (BTA) in 2000. Under the BTA, - which Congress approved in 2001, the United States extended conditional normal trade relations (NTR) to Vietnam.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam Relations 1975 – 2006: a Theoretical Approach
    1 US – Vietnam Relations 1975 – 2006: A Theoretical Approach Viet Tuan Nguyen Hanoi, Vietnam M.A., University of Virginia, 2008 M.A., Assumption University of Thailand, 2004 B.A., Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam, 1996 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Politics University of Virginia August, 2014 ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ 2 ABSTRACT This dissertation seeks to explore the rationale behind the three-decade long and bumpy process of normalization of US-Vietnam relations since the end of the Vietnam War in 1975 until the two countries reached full normalcy in 2006. The dissertation goes beyond conventional theories of international relations to explore the role of ideas (i.e. national beliefs about effective means for achieving interests, and the war mentality that vividly exists in both countries) and asymmetry of power in shaping the pace and scope of the normalization process. Through the employment of congruence and process tracing methods, the dissertation finds that the interaction of different ideas in the context of disparity of capabilities between the two countries, given the special history of the relationship, generated unique outcomes that cannot be reduced to strategic circumstances: the extreme sluggishness and politics of inattention on the US side, and the over-skepticism and frustration on the Vietnamese side throughout the process, all contributed to the prolonged and rough path to normalization. Such findings are confirmed by empirical evidence obtained in different periods of the normalization process. The dissertation concludes with an overall evaluation of competing theories in explaining the normalization process, followed by some implications and recommendations for future US-Vietnam relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Vietnam's Trade Policy
    Volume 1, 2017 VIETNAM’S TRADE POLICY: A DEVELOPING NATION ASSESSMENT Dr Steven Clarke* RMIT University, Ho Chi Minh [email protected] City, Vietnam Dr Mohammamadreza RMIT University, Ho Chi Minh [email protected] Akbari City, Vietnam Dr Shagheyegh Maleki RMIT University, Ho Chi Minh [email protected] Far City, Vietnam * Corresponding author ABSTRACT Aim/Purpose This paper is a review of the progress of the Vietnam socio-economic and development plan and an assessment of the extent to which Vietnam is putting in place the critical social and economic development structures that will enable it to reach the status of “developed nation” in the time set (2020) by its national strategic plan. The research will identify and review trade patterns, trade policy and the effect of foreign aid on Vietnam’s plan to transform its economy and society from a developing nation status to status of developed nation. The overriding question stands as “is” Vietnam effec- tively moving towards developed nation status soon”? Background This paper examines the history of Vietnam from the command economy in its transition to a market driven economy, the criteria, hurdles and challenges as the country moves towards a developed country status. Methodology Applied research based on the body of research in socio-economic develop- ment theory, international trade and market theory. The review is conducted by collecting and analyzing data on foreign trade, foreign aid, business and general economic growth, development and social wellbeing. It identifies and appraises the trade patterns, trade effects, socio-economic policies and the effect of foreign aid] on the economic growth and the progress of the coun- try towards becoming a developed nation state.
    [Show full text]